Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are devastating injuries that can result in significant morbidity and time away from sport. There remains considerable variation in strategies employed for investigation, indications for operative intervention, outcome reporting, and rehabilitation following these injuries. At present no study has yet provided a comprehensive overview evaluating the extent, range, and overall summary of the published literature pertaining to MLKI. Our aim is to perform a methodologically rigorous scoping review, mapping the literature evaluating the diagnosis and management of MLKI. This scoping review will address three aims: firstly, to map the current extent and nature of evidence for diagnosis and management of MLKI; secondly, to summarize and disseminate existing research findings to practitioners; and thirdly, to highlight gaps in current literature. A three-step search strategy as described by accepted methodology will be employed to identify peer-reviewed literature including reviews, technical notes, opinion pieces, and original research. An initial limited search will be performed to determine suitable search terms, followed by an expanded search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science). Two reviewers will independently screen identified studies for final inclusion.Aims
Methods
Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and trial registries up to 26 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: pain, function, serious adverse events (SAEs), blood loss, implant stability, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay.Aims
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine
the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes for a medial-pivot total
knee replacement (TKR) system. The objectives were to synthesise
available survivorship, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and reasons for
revision for this system. A systematic search was conducted of two online databases to
identify sources of survivorship, KSS, and reasons for revision.
Survivorship results were compared with values in the National Joint
Registry of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (NJR).Objectives
Methods
Total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective
method of treating end-stage arthritis of the knee. It is not, however,
a procedure without risk due to a number of factors, one of which
is diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to estimate
the general prevalence of diabetes in patients about to undergo
primary TKR and to determine whether diabetes mellitus adversely
affects the outcome. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis
according to the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
(MOOSE) guidelines. The Odds Ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD)
were used to represent the estimate of risk of a specific outcome.
Our results showed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among patients
undergoing TKR was 12.2%. Patients with diabetes mellitus had an increased
risk of deep infection (OR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI),
1.38 to 1.88), deep vein thrombosis (in Asia, OR = 2.57, 95% CI,
1.58 to 4.20), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 1.89, 95% CI, 1.04
to 3.45), aseptic loosening (OR = 9.36, 95% CI, 4.63 to 18.90),
and a poorer Knee Society function subscore (MD = -5.86, 95% CI,
-10.27 to -1.46). Surgeons should advise patients specifically about
these increased risks when obtaining informed consent and be meticulous about
their peri-operative care. Cite this article:
Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
is one of the most devastating and frequent injuries of the knee. Surgical
reconstruction is the current standard of care for treatment of
ACL injuries in active patients. The widespread adoption of ACL
reconstruction over primary repair was based on early perception
of the limited healing capacity of the ACL. Although the majority
of ACL reconstruction surgeries successfully restore gross joint stability,
post-traumatic osteoarthritis is commonplace following these injuries,
even with ACL reconstruction. The development of new techniques
to limit the long-term clinical sequelae associated with ACL reconstruction
has been the main focus of research over the past decades. The improved
knowledge of healing, along with recent advances in tissue engineering
and regenerative medicine, has resulted in the discovery of novel
biologically augmented ACL-repair techniques that have satisfactory
outcomes in preclinical studies. This instructional review provides
a summary of the latest advances made in ACL repair. Cite this article:
