Aims. Corticosteroid injections are often used to manage glenohumeral arthritis in patients who may be candidates for future total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). In the conservative management of these patients, corticosteroid injections are often provided for symptomatic relief. The purpose of this study was to determine if the timing of corticosteroid injections prior to TSA or rTSA is associated with changes in rates of revision and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following these procedures. Methods. Data were collected from a national insurance database from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients who underwent shoulder corticosteroid injection within one year prior to ipsilateral TSA or rTSA were identified and stratified into the following cohorts: < three months, three to six months, six to nine months, and nine to 12 months from time of corticosteroid injection to TSA or rTSA. A control cohort with no corticosteroid injection within one year prior to TSA or rTSA was used for comparison. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the association between specific time intervals and outcomes. Results. In total, 4,252 patients were included in this study. Among those, 1,632 patients (38.4%) received corticosteroid injection(s) within one year prior to TSA or rTSA and 2,620 patients (61.6%) did not. On multivariate analysis, patients who received corticosteroid injection < three months prior to TSA or rTSA were at significantly increased risk for revision (odds ratio (OR) 2.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77 to 3.28); p < 0.001) when compared with the control cohort. However, there was no significant increase in revision risk for all other timing interval cohorts. Notably, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 was a significant independent risk factor for all-cause revision (OR 4.00 (95% CI 1.40 to 8.92); p = 0.036). Conclusion. There is a time-dependent relationship between the preoperative timing of corticosteroid injection and the incidence of all-cause revision surgery following TSA or rTSA. This analysis suggests that an interval of at least three months should be maintained between corticosteroid injection and TSA or rTSA to minimize risks of subsequent revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):620–626

Aims. Recent studies have suggested that corticosteroid injections into the knee may harm the joint resulting in cartilage loss and possibly accelerating the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to assess whether patients with, or at risk of developing, symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee who receive intra-articular corticosteroid injections have an increased risk of requiring arthroplasty. Methods. We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a multicentre observational cohort study that followed 4,796 patients with, or at risk of developing, osteoarthritis of the knee on an annual basis with follow-up available up to nine years. Increased risk for symptomatic OA was defined as frequent knee symptoms (pain, aching, or stiffness) without radiological evidence of OA and two or more risk factors, while OA was defined by the presence of both femoral osteophytes and frequent symptoms in one or both knees. Missing data were imputed with multiple imputations using chained equations. Time-dependent propensity score matching was performed to match patients at the time of receving their first injection with controls. The effect of corticosteroid injections on the rate of subsequent (total and partial) knee arthroplasty was estimated using Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses. Results. After removing patients lost to follow-up, 3,822 patients remained in the study. A total of 249 (31.3%) of the 796 patients who received corticosteroid injections, and 152 (5.0%) of the 3,026 who did not, had knee arthroplasty. In the matched cohort, Cox proportional-hazards regression resulted in a hazard ratio of 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37 to 1.81; p < 0.001) and each injection increased the absolute risk of arthroplasty by 9.4% at nine years’ follow-up compared with those who did not receive injections. Conclusion. Corticosteroid injections seem to be associated with an increased risk of knee arthroplasty in patients with, or at risk of developing, symptomatic OA of the knee. These findings suggest that a conservative approach regarding the treatment of these patients with corticosteroid injections should be recommended. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):586–592

Aims. We aimed to establish the short- and long-term efficacy of corticosteroid injection for coccydynia, and to determine if betamethasone or triamcinolone has the best effect. Methods. During 2009 to 2016, we treated 277 patients with chronic coccydynia with either one 6 mg betamethasone or one 20 mg triamcinolone cortisone injection. A susequent injection was given to 62 (26%) of the patients. All were reviewed three to four months after injection, and 241 replied to a questionnaire a mean of 36 months (12 to 88) after the last injection. No pain at the early review was considered early success. When the patient had not been subsequently operated on, and indicated on the questionnaire that they were either well or much better, it was considered a long-term success. Results. At the three- to four-month review, 22 (9%) reported that they had no pain. The long-term success of one injection was 15% and rose to 29% after a second injection. Logistic regression tests showed that both early success (odds ratio (OR) 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 14.4; p = 0.001) and late success (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 8.3; p = 0.001) was greater with triamcinolone than with betamethasone. Late success was greater for patients with symptoms for less than 12 months (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.7; p = 0.006). We saw no complications of the injections. Conclusion. We conclude that the effect of corticosteroid injection for coccygodynia is moderate, possibly because we used modest doses of the drugs. Even so, they seem worthwhile as they are easily and quickly performed, and complications are rare. If the choice is between injections of betamethasone or triamcinolone, the latter should be selected. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:709–714

Aims. To describe the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes related to COVID-19 infection following corticosteroid injections (CSI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. To describe the incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, positive SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing or positive imaging findings following CSI at our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A retrospective observational study was undertaken of consecutive patients who had CSI in our local hospitals between 1 February and 30June 2020. Electronic patient medical records (EPR) and radiology information system (RIS) database were reviewed. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing, radiological investigations, patient management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Lung findings were categorized according to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidelines. Reference was made to the incidence of lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases in our region. Results. Overall, 1,656 lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases were identified in our upper tier local authority (UTLA), a rate of 306.6 per 100,000, as of 30June 2020. A total of 504 CSI injections were performed on 443 patients between 1 February and 30June 2020. A total of 11 RT-PCR tests were performed on nine patients (2% of those who had CSI), all of which were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and five patients (1.1%) received an SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody test, of which 2 (0.5%) were positive consistent with prior COVID-19 infection, however both patients were asymptomatic. Seven patients (1.6%) had radiological investigations for respiratory symptoms. One patient with indeterminate ground glass change was identified. Conclusion. The incidence of positive COVID-19 infection following corticosteroid injections was very low in our cohort and no adverse clinical outcomes related to COVID-19 infection following CSI were identified. Our findings are consistent with CSI likely being low risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this small observational study are supportive of the current multi-society guidelines regarding the judicious use of CSI. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:605–611

Purpose. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection is widely used for symptomatic relief of knee osteoarthritis. However, if pain is not improved which consequences a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is a potential risk of post-operative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid injection increases the risk of PJI and to investigate a time frame in which the risk of subsequent infection is significantly increased. Methods. A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were original studies investigating the rate of PJI in patients receiving pre-operative intra-articular corticosteroid injection compared to controls. Results. A total of 380 unique articles were screened. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with 255,627 patients in total. Overall, no statistical significance was observed in the intra-articular infection rate in corticosteroid compared to controls groups. However, intra-articular corticosteroid injections within 3 months prior to TKA were associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.37–1.67, p < 0.01); this was not observed in the 6-month period (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.80–1.39, p = 0.72). Conclusions. Performing an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months prior to TKA is associated with a significantly increased risk of PJI. The current evidence supports the safe use of intra-articular corticosteroid injection more than 6 months before TKA. However, additional studies are needed to clarify the risk of PJI after TKA implantation between 3 and 6 months after the last corticoid injection

Aims. Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results. The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion. We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):353–359

Aims. The objective of this double-blind randomised controlled trial was to assess whether ultrasound guidance improved the efficacy of corticosteroid injections for Morton’s neuroma (MN). . Patients and Methods. In all, 50 feet (40 patients) were recruited for this study but five feet were excluded due to the patients declining further participation. The mean age of the remaining 36 patients (45 feet) was 57.8 years (standard deviation (. sd. ) 12.9) with a female preponderance (33F:12M). All patients were followed-up for 12 months. Treatment was randomised to an ultrasound guided (Group A) or non-ultrasound guided (Group B) injection of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 2 ml 1% lignocaine, following ultrasound confirmation of the diagnosis. . Results. The mean visual analogue score for pain improved significantly in both groups (Group A – from 64 mm, . sd. 25 mm to 29 mm, . sd. 27; Group B – from 69 mm, . sd. 23 mm to 37 mm, . sd. 25) with no statistical difference between them at all time-points. The failure rate within 12 months of treatment was 11/23 (48%) and 12/22 (55%) in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.458). The improvement in Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire Index and patient satisfaction favoured Group A in the short-term (three months) that almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.059 and 0.066 respectively). However, this difference was not observed beyond three months. . Conclusion. This study has shown that ultrasound guidance did not demonstrably improve the efficacy of corticosteroid injections in patients with MN. Take home message: In the presence of a clear diagnosis of MN, a trained clinician who understands the forefoot anatomy may perform an injection without ultrasound guidance with good and safe results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:498–503

Interstitial supraspinatus tears can cause persistent subacromial impingement symptoms despite non operative treatment. Autologous tendon cell injection (ATI) is a non-surgical treatment for tendinopathies and tear. We report a randomised controlled study of ATI compared to corticosteroid injection (CS) as treatment for interstitial supraspinatus tears and tendinopathy. Inclusion criteria were patients with symptom duration > 6 months, MRI confirmed intrasubstance supraspinatus tear, and prior treatment with physiotherapy and ≥ one CS or PRP injection. Participants were randomised to receive ATI to the interstitial tear or corticosteroid injection to the subacromial bursa in a 2:1 ratio, under ultrasound guidance. Assessments of pain (VAS) and function (ASES) were performed at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment. 30 participants (19 randomised to ATI) with a mean age of 50.5 years (10 females) and a mean duration of symptoms of 23.5 months. Baseline VAS pain and ASES scores were comparable between groups. While mean VAS pain scores improved in both groups at 3 months after treatment, pain scores were superior with ATI at 6 months (p=0.01). Mean ASES scores in the ATI group were superior to the CS group at 3 months (p=0.026) and 6 months (p=0.012). Seven participants in the CS group withdrew prior to 12 months due to lack of improvement. At 12 months, mean VAS pain in the ATI group was 1.6 ± 1.3. The improvements in mean ASES scores in the ATI group at 6 and 12 months were greater than the MCID (12.0 points). At 12 months, 95% of ATI participants had an ASES score > the PASS (patient acceptable symptom state). This is the first level one study using ATI to treat interstitial supraspinatus tear. ATI results in a significant reduction in pain and improvement in shoulder function

Introduction: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent corticosteroid spinal injections and/or surgery for lumbar juxtafacet cysts to determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection and/or surgery for the treatment of lumbar juxtafacet cysts. Methods: The charts of 40 patients who underwent corticosteroid injection and/or surgery for the treatment of symptomatic juxtafacet cysts were reviewed and an outcome questionnaire was sent to each patient. All patients responded to the questionnaire (100%). Results: Forty-four juxtafacet cysts were treated in 40 patients. 28 cysts were initially treated with corticosteroid injection. 18 facet joints adjacent to the cysts were injected (4 were injected on two or more occasions), 13 underwent epidural injection and 5 underwent nerve sheath exit foraminal blocks. 18 obtained no Benefit from the use of corticosteroid injections and proceeded to surgical treatment. Of the 10 patients that did not undergo surgery, at follow-up 2 reported no clinical change and were considering surgical treatment. This represents a 71% failure rate for non-operative treatment with corticosteroid injections. 34 cysts were resected from 31 patients. Two (6%) were ligamental and 32 were facetal. 31 cysts were resected by laminectomy alone and 3 patients underwent laminectomy and bone only fusion. One cyst (3%) recurred and was managed by repeat laminectomy. One patient required instrumented lumbosacral fusion for increasing anterolisthesis. Incidental dural tear was the most common surgical complication occurring in two cases (6%). One patient demonstrated significant weakness of ankle and foot dorsiflexion which recovered incompletely. Average follow-up for the surgical group was 18 months (5–72 months). 27 scored an excellent or good outcome (79%), 3 scored a fair outcome, 3 were considered poor and one patient was worse. 30 (88%) patients were satisfied having complete improvement or improved with residual back or leg symptoms. Three responded as no change and one was worse. Discussion: Juxtafacet cysts are an uncommon cause of radiculopathy. Corticosteroid injection into the adjacent facet joints, epidural space or exit foraminae of the spine produces disappointing results. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice with low rates of complications, recurrences and residual complaints

Introduction. Subacromial corticosteroid injection is widely used in the treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS). There is increasing interest in using ultrasound (US) to improve the accurate placement of injections. This study investigated whether the accuracy of placement of US-guided subacromial corticosteroid injections influences patients' outcome of pain and function. Method. Secondary analysis of data from a 2−2 factorial randomised controlled trial investigating exercise and corticosteroid injection for pain and function in SIS. US-guided injections were delivered according to a pre-defined protocol. Video images were reviewed to categorise accuracy of injection into the subacromial bursa into 3 accuracy groups using pre-defined criteria: 1) not in the subacromial bursa; 2) probably in the subacromial bursa; and 3) definitely in the subacromial bursa. The primary outcome measure was the self-reported Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score, compared at 6 weeks and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included SPADI pain and function subscales and participant global rating of overall change from baseline. A mixed effects model was used to compare accuracy groups' outcomes at 6 weeks and 6 months, adjusted for baseline covariates. Results. US-guided injection accuracy data were available for 114 participants; with 22 participants in group 1, 21 in group 2 and 71 in group 3. There were no significant differences in mean SPADI scores among the three injection accuracy groups at 6 weeks (group 2 vs. 1: 8.22 (95% CI −4.01, 20.50); group 3 vs. 1: −0.57 (−10.27, 9.13)) and 6 months (group 2 vs. 1: 12.38 (−5.34, 30.10); group 3 vs. 1: 3.10 (−11.04, 17.23)). Similarly, no differences between accuracy groups were seen in SPADI pain, SPADI function or participant global rating of change. Conclusion. The accuracy of US-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection in SIS does not influence clinical response to the injection, questioning the need for guided injections. Larger, adequately powered studies are required to explore this further

Introduction and Objective. Total shoulder replacement is a common elective procedure offered to patients with end stage arthritis. While most patients experience significant pain relief and improved function within months of surgery, some remain unsatisfied because of residual pain or dissatisfaction with their functional status. Among these patients, when laboratory workup eliminates infection as a possibility, corticosteroid injection (CSI) into the joint space, or on the periprosthetic anatomic structures, is a common procedure used for symptom management. However, the efficacy and safety of this procedure has not been previously reported in shoulder literature. Materials and Methods. A retrospective chart review identified primary TSA patients who subsequently received a CSI into a replaced shoulder from 2011 – 2018 by multiple surgeons. Patients receiving an injection underwent clinical exam, laboratory analysis to rule out infection, and radiographic evaluation prior to CSI. Demographic variables were recorded, and a patient satisfaction survey assessed the efficacy of the injection. Results. Of the 43 responders, 48.8% remembered the injection. The average time from index arthroplasty to injection was median 16.8 months. Overall, 61.9% reported decreased pain, 28.6% reported increased motion, and 28.6% reported long term decreased swelling. Improvement lasted greater than one month for 42.9% of patients, and overall 52.4% reported improvement (slight to great) in the shoulder following CSI. No patient developed a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 2 years of injection. Conclusions. This study suggests that certain patients following TSA may benefit from a CSI. However, this should only be performed once clinical, radiographic, and laboratory examination has ruled out conditions unlikely to improve long term from a CSI. Given these findings, further study in a large, prospective trial is warranted to fully evaluate the benefits of CSI following TSA

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients to a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing corticosteroid injection (CSI) to autologous protein solution (APS) injection for the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain in a community care setting. The study focused on recruitment rates and retention of participants throughout, and collected data on the interventions’ safety and efficacy. Methods. Participants were recruited from two community musculoskeletal treatment centres in the UK. Patients were eligible if aged 18 years or older, and had a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome which the treating clinician thought was suitable for treatment with a subacromial injection. Consenting patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to a patient-blinded subacromial injection of CSI (standard care) or APS. The primary outcome measures of this study relate to rates of recruitment, retention, and compliance with intervention and follow-up to determine feasibility. Secondary outcome measures relate to the safety and efficacy of the interventions. Results. A total of 53 patients were deemed eligible, and 50 patients (94%) recruited between April 2022 and October 2022. Overall, 49 patients (98%) complied with treatment. Outcome data were collected in 100% of participants at three months and 94% at six months. There were no significant adverse events. Both groups demonstrated improvement in patient-reported outcome measures over the six-month period. Conclusion. Our study shows that it is feasible to recruit to a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing APS and CSI for subacromial pain in terms of clinical outcomes and health-resource use in the UK. Safety and efficacy data are presented. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):534–542

We performed a prospective, randomised trial on 106 patients to compare the effects of local corticosteroid injections with physiotherapy as advocated by Cyriax in the treatment of tennis elbow. The main outcome measures were the severity of pain, pain provoked by resisted dorsiflexion of the wrist, and patient satisfaction. At six weeks 22 of 53 patients in the injection group were free from pain compared with only three in the physiotherapy group. In the corticosteroid-treated group 26 patients had no pain on resisted dorsiflexion of the wrist compared with only three in the physiotherapy group. Thirty-five patients who had injections and 14 who had physiotherapy were satisfied with the outcome of treatment at six weeks. At the final assessment there were 18 excellent and 18 good results in the corticosteroid group and one excellent and 12 good results in the physiotherapy group. There was a significant increase in grip strength in both groups but those with injections had a significantly better result. After one year there were no significant differences between the two groups. Half of the patients, however, had received only the initial treatment, 20% had had combined therapy and 30% had had surgery. We conclude that at six weeks, treatment with corticosteroid injections was more effective than Cyriax physiotherapy and we recommend it because of its rapid action, reduction of pain and absence of side-effects

Subacromial corticosteroid injections are a well-recognised management for chronic shoulder pain and are routinely used in general practice and musculoskeletal clinics. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) of a joint is a rare presentation in the United Kingdom. International literature exists for cases of reactivated latent tuberculosis following intra-articular corticosteroid injections in a knee; however there are no reports of a primary presentation of undiagnosed TB in a joint following therapeutic corticosteroid injections. A seventy-four year old lady presented with a one-year history of a painful shoulder, which clinically manifested as a rotator cuff tear with impingement syndrome. Following three subacromial depo-medrone injections, the patient developed a painless “cold” lump which was investigated as a suspicious, possibly metastatic lesion. This lump slowly developed a sinus and a subsequent MRI scan identified a large intra-articular abscess formation. The sinus then progressed to a large intra-articular 5×8 cm cavity with exposed bone (picture available). The patient had no diagnosis of TB but had pathogen exposure as a child via her parents. The patient underwent three weeks of multiple débridement and intravenous amoxicillin/flucloxacillin to treat Staphylococcus aureus grown on an initial culture. Despite best efforts the wound further dehisced with a very painful and immobile shoulder. Given the poor response to penicillin and ongoing wound breakdown there was a suspicion of TB. After a further fortnight, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was eventually cultured and quadruple antimicrobial therapy commenced. Ongoing débridement of the rotator cuff and bone was required alongside two months of unremitting closed vacuum dressing. The wound remained persistently open and excision of the humeral head was necessary, followed by secondary wound closure. There were no extra-articular manifestations of TB in this patient. At present the shoulder is de-functioned, the wound healed and shoulder pain free. This unique case study highlights that intra-articular corticosteroid can precipitate the first presentation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis septic arthritis. The evolution of symptoms mimic many other shoulder complaints making confident diagnosis a challenge. The infective bone and joint destruction did not respond to the management described in the current literature. There remains a further management issues as to whether arthroplasty surgery can be offered to post-TB infected shoulder joints. Taking a TB exposure history is indicated prior to local immunosuppressant injection, particularly in the older age group of western populations and ethnicities with known risk factors

Background. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common problem affecting 10–25% of the population. Physiotherapy, anti-inflammatories, corticosteroid injections and surgery have all been described in the management of GTPS, all with limited, temporal success. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been proposed as a potential management option for this difficult presentation. Method. We ran a prospective, 2 arm, single blinded, randomised control trial comparing focused shockwave therapy to an ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue pain score. Secondary outcome measures included the Harris hip score and Trendelenburg test for function; the SF-36 for quality of life (QoL); and a Likert scale question for a subjective assessment of symptom improvement. Results. 104 patients (10 males and 94 females), of mean age 61.5 years were recruited. 53 were randomised to receive ESWT and 51 to receive an image guided injection. 11 patients were lost to follow up. Baseline scores were equal between the groups. At 3 months, pain, function and QoL scores had improved in both groups. The Trendelenburg test was significantly improved in the ESWT group with 80% patients being negative compared to 80% positive at baseline (p<0.001). At 12 months, the improvement in Trendelenburg test was maintained in the ESWT group, but the injection group had reverted to baseline. Across all outcomes, the ESWT group had significantly improved scores compared to the injection group; VAS 3.71 versus 5.50 (p=0.007, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 3.08), HHS 69.7 vs 57.5 (p=0.002, 95% confidence interval −20.0to −4.6) and SF-36 52.4 vs 47.7 (p=0.048, 95% confidence interval −9.31 to −0.04). Conclusions. We have shown focused ESWT is an effective treatment for patients with GTPS. We hope to advocate ESWT as an effective non-invasive treatment modality for this challenging patient population

Introduction. Recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may take longer than patients expect. Furthermore, there are a subset of patients who still experience pain and dissatisfaction despite normal physical examination, radiographs, and laboratory analysis. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is commonly used nonsurgical treatment for painful knee arthritis. However, the efficacy of CSI in patients with a painful TKA remains unknown. Methods. A retrospective charge review was performed to identify a cohort of patients who had a primary TKA performed between 2015 and 2016 and later received a CSI. All TKAs and CSIs were performed by a fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon. Patients receiving a CSI underwent a clinical exam, laboratory analysis to rule out infection, and radiographic evaluation prior to injection. Patient variables were recorded and a survey assessed the efficacy of the injection. The survey response rate was 63.6%. Results. Of the 119 responders, 81.5% remembered the injection. The average time from index arthroplasty injection was 16.9 months (range 1–133) and patients received 1.3 averaged CSIs (range 1–4). Overall, 77.3% reported decreased pain, 54.6% reported increased motion, and 60.8% reported decreased swelling. The relief lasted greater than three months for 53.6% of patients, and 84.6% reported improvement (slight to great) in the knee. The rate of patient reported adverse events was 5.0% and included pruritus, pain, decreased energy, swelling, and clicking. No patients developed PJI as a result of the injection. Conclusions. The results of this survey suggest that patients with a painful and/or swollen TKA may benefit from a CSI. However, this should only be performed once clinical, radiographic, and laboratory examination has ruled out recognizable etiologies (i.e. infection, loosening, instability). This study certainly has its limitations but it is the only study of its kind. The authors hope that this provides impetus for further research regarding this investigation

Introduction Plantar fasciitis is a common presenting problem and there are multiple treatments available. There is little scientific data to assist in the selection of the most efficacious or cost-effective treatment. This study compared the efficacy of corticosteroid injection and low-dose ESWT for the treatment of chronic proximal plantar fasciitis. Methods One hundred and thirty-two cases of plantar fasciitis were enrolled into this prospective study over five years. Eligible patients performed a stretching program for the gastrocsoleus. In addition, patients randomized to group A received an intralesional corticosteroid injection, while group B received low dose ESWT (3 x 1000 pulses, energy flux density 0.08/mm2). Nineteen patients were not randomized and comprised a control group C. Patients were assessed before, and then three and 12 months post treatment using a VAS, and algometer (tenderness threshold, TT). The groups were compared using generalized linear models for repeated measures of VAS and TT scores, with orthogonal contrasts. Results The three groups were significantly different in their VAS scores post treatment. Over the 12 months, pain levels reduced for all groups, but the trends between them differed significantly. The corticosteroid (CSI) group, had significantly lower levels of pain than the ESWT or controls. At 12 months, the CSI and ESWT had similar levels of pain, both significantly lower than that in the controls. Similar trends were found for TT. Threshold levels increased for all three groups post treatment but the trends between the groups were significantly different. At three months, the CSI group had significantly higher TTs than both the ESWT and control groups. By 12 months, all groups had higher TTs but they were similar. The TT of the CSI group had plateaued by three months. Of the 64 heels that received CSI, there were no infections and no cases of rupture of the plantar fascia. There were eight cases of post-injection pain. All patients found the injection unpleasant. Of the 61 heels treated with ESWT, six reported throbbing pain and erythema. Four reported a severe headache. All patients found the procedure unpleasant. Conclusions Intralesional corticosteroid injection is more efficacious, and much more cost-effective, than ESWT, in the treatment of plantar fasciitis present for at least six weeks. The injection achieves a significant and lasting reduction in pain and tenderness within three months. Correctly used, this treatment has a low incidence of complications

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has shown to be a general stimulation for repair and 1 year results showed promising success percentages. To determine the effectiveness of PRP compared with corticosteroid injections in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with a two-year follow-up. A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2006 and January 2008. The trial was conducted in two Dutch teaching hospitals. 100 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned to a leucocyte-enriched PRP group (n=51) or in the corticosteroid group (n=49). Randomization and allocation to the trial group were carried out by a central computer system. Patients received either a corticosteroid injection or an autologous platelet concentrate injection through a peppering needling technique. The primary analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome (DASH) scores. The PRP group was more often successfully treated than the corticosteroid group (p<.0001). Success was defined as a reduction of 25% on VAS or DASH scores without a re-intervention after 2 years. When baseline VAS and DASH scores were compared with the scores at 2 years follow-up, both groups significantly improved across time (intention-to-treat principle). However, the DASH scores of the corticosteroid group returned back to baseline levels, while the PRP significantly improved (as-treated principle). There were no complications related to the use of PRP. Treatment of patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with PRP reduces pain and increases function significantly, exceeding the effect of corticosteroid injection even after a follow-up of two years. Future decisions for application of PRP for lateral epicondylitis should be confirmed by further follow-up from this trial and should take into account possible costs and harms as well as benefits

Aims. Frozen shoulder is a common, painful condition that results in impairment of function. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for frozen shoulder and can be given as glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injection or suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Both injection types have been shown to significantly improve shoulder pain and range of motion. It is not currently known which is superior in terms of relieving patients’ symptoms. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of corticosteroid injection given as either a GHJ injection or SSNB. Methods. The Therapeutic Injections For Frozen Shoulder (TIFFS) study is a single centre, parallel, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to either a GHJ corticosteroid injection or SSNB. Participants in both trial arms will then receive physiotherapy as normal for frozen shoulder. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at three months after injection. Secondary outcomes include OSS at six and 12 months, range of shoulder movement at three months, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale, abbreviated Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and EuroQol five-level five-dimension health index at three months, six months, and one year after injection. A minimum of 40 patients will be recruited to obtain 80% power to detect a minimally important difference of ten points on the OSS between the groups at three months after injection. The study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04965376. Conclusion. The results of this trial will demonstrate if there is a difference in shoulder pain and function after GHJ injection or SSNB in patients with frozen shoulder. This will help provide effective treatment to patients with frozen shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(3):205–209

Aims. A local injection may be used as an early option in the treatment of Morton’s neuroma, and can be performed using various medications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of injections of hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid in the treatment of this condition. Methods. A total of 91 patients were assessed for this trial, of whom 45 were subsequently included and randomized into two groups. One patient was lost to follow-up, leaving 22 patients (24 feet) in each group. The patients in the hyaluronic acid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (one per week) of hyaluronic acid (Osteonil Plus). Those in the corticosteroid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (also one per week) of triamcinolone (Triancil). The patients were evaluated before treatment and at one, three, six, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and complications. Results. Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and AOFAS scores (p < 0.05) after 12 months. The corticosteroid group had a significantly greater reduction in VAS and increase in AOFAS scores compared with the hyaluronic acid group, at one, three, and six months, but with no significant difference at 12 months. There were no complications in the hyaluronic acid group. There were minor local complications in six patients (six feet) (25.0%) in the corticosteroid group, all with discolouration of the skin at the site of the injection. These minor complications might have been due to the three weekly injections of a relatively high dose of corticosteroid. No patient subsequently underwent excision of the neuroma. Conclusion. An ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection showed statistically significantly better functional and pain outcomes than an ultrasound-guided injection of hyaluronic acid for the treatment of a Morton’s neuroma at many timepoints. Thus, a corticosteroid injection should be regarded as a primary option in the treatment of these patients, and the only indication for an injection of hyaluronic acid might be in patients in whom corticosteroid is contraindicated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1093–1099