Aims. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates. Methods. A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed. Results. There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA. Conclusion. Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):622–634

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare a bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA design in terms of kinematics, measured using fluoroscopy and stability as micromotion using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methods. A total of 40 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were included in this randomized controlled trial. All patients performed a step-up and lunge task in front of a monoplane fluoroscope one year postoperatively. Femorotibial contact point (CP) locations were determined at every flexion angle and compared between the groups. RSA images were taken at baseline, six weeks, three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared postoperatively for two years. Results. The BCR-TKA demonstrated a kinematic pattern comparable to the natural knee’s screw-home mechanism in the step-up task. In the lunge task, the medial CP of the BCR-TKA was more anterior in the early flexion phase, while laterally the CP was more posterior during the entire movement cycle. The BCR-TKA group showed higher tibial migration. No differences were found for the clinical and functional outcomes. Conclusion. The BCR-TKA shows a different kinematic pattern in early flexion/late extension compared to the CR-TKA. The difference between both implants is mostly visible in the flexion phase in which the anterior cruciate ligament is effective; however, both designs fail to fully replicate the motion of a natural knee. The higher migration of the BCR-TKA was concerning and highlights the importance of longer follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):35–46

Aims. This study compared patient-reported outcomes of three total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs from one manufacturer: one cruciate-retaining (CR) design, and two cruciate-sacrificing designs, anterior-stabilized (AS) and posterior-stabilized (PS). Methods. Patients scheduled for primary TKA were included in a single-centre, prospective, three-armed, blinded randomized trial (n = 216; 72 per group). After intraoperative confirmation of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) integrity, patients were randomly allocated to receive a CR, AS, or PS design from the same TKA system. Insertion of an AS or PS design required PCL resection. The primary outcome was the mean score of all five subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at two-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all KOOS subscales, Oxford Knee Score, EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire, EuroQol visual analogue scale, range of motion (ROM), and willingness to undergo the operation again. Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Results. Patients reported similar levels of pain, function, satisfaction, and general health regardless of the prosthetic design they received. Mean maximal flexion (129° (95% confidence interval (CI) 127° to 131°) was greater in the PS group than in the CR (120° (95% CI 121° to 124°)) and AS groups (122° (95% CI 120° to 124°)). Conclusion. Despite differences in design and constraint, CR, AS, and PS designs from a single TKA system resulted in no differences in patient-reported outcomes at two-year follow-up. PS patients had statistically better ROM, but the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(12):1271–1278

Purpose. To compare postoperative clinical outcomes between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining and resecting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using same cruciate-substituting (CS) inserts, and to elucidate the clinical relevance of the residual PCL in cruciate-retaining TKA, considering intraoperative influence factors, such as the posterior tibial slope, posterior condylar offset, joint gap, joint balance, and joint laxity. Methods. A total of 64 consecutive knees (44 patients) were enrolled in this study and divided into following two groups: 39 knees underwent PCL-retaining TKA group (CR group), and 25 underwent PCL-resecting TKA group (CS group). Preoperative patients’ demographic data and one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including range of motion, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were compared between two groups. Results. Regarding range of motion, the average preoperative ROM was -14.3/120.0 degrees in the CR group and improved to -2.4/118.9 degrees postoperatively. In the CS group, the average preoperative ROM was -7.5/130 degrees and changed to -2.2/122.4 degrees postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative ROM between the groups (P=0.16). The KOOS (from 47.1 to 69.5 in CR group; from 41.1 to 70.8 in CS group) and JOA scores (from 59.2 to 76.9 in CR group; from 55.6 to 80.8 in CS group) were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.01). However, there was no significance in these postoperative scores between two groups (P = 0.09). There was also no significance in FJS-12 between two groups (70.3 in CR group and 66.9 in CS group; P=0.53). Conclusions. Residual PCL in TKA with a CS insert would not impact one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including KOOS, JOA, and FJS-12

We have developed a new tensor for total knee replacements which is designed to assist with soft-tissue balancing throughout the full range of movement with a reduced patellofemoral joint. Using this tensor in 40 patients with osteoarthritis we compared the intra-operative joint gap in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised total knee replacements at 0°, 10°, 45°, 90° and 135° of flexion, with the patella both everted and reduced. While the measurement of the joint gap with a reduced patella in posterior-stabilised knees increased from extension to flexion, it remained constant for cruciate-retaining joints throughout a full range of movement. The joint gaps at deep knee flexion were significantly smaller for both types of prosthetic knee when the patellofemoral joint was reduced (p < 0.05)

The amount of anteroposterior laxity required for a good range of movement and knee function in a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement (TKR) continues to be debated. We undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the effects of anteroposterior laxity on the range of movement and knee function in 55 patients following the e-motion cruciate-retaining TKR with a minimum follow-up of two years. The knees were divided into stable (anteroposterior translation, ≤ 10 mm, 38 patients) and unstable (anteroposterior translation, > 10 mm, 17) groups based on the anteroposterior laxity, measured using stress radiographs. We compared the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, the Western Ontario MacMasters University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, weight-bearing flexion, non-weight-bearing flexion and the reduction of flexion under weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing conditions, which we referred to as delta flexion, between the two groups at the final follow-up. There were no differences between the stable and unstable groups with regard to the mean HHS and WOMAC total scores, as well as weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing flexion (p = 0.277, p = 0.082, p = 0.095 and p = 0.646, respectively). However, the stable group had a better WOMAC function score and less delta flexion than the unstable group (p = 0.011 and p = 0.005, respectively). Our results suggest that stable knees with laxity ≤ 10 mm have a good functional outcome and less reduction of flexion under weight-bearing conditions than unstable knees with laxity > 10 mm following an e-motion cruciate-retaining TKR

The posterior tibial slope angle (PTS) in posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty influences the knee kinematics, knee stability, flexion gap, knee range of motion (ROM) and the tension of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The current technique of using an arbitrary (often 3–5 degrees) PTS in all cases seldom will restore native slope in cruciate retaining TKA. Questions/Purposes: The primary objective was to determine if we could surgically reproduce the native PTS in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The second objective was to determine if reproduction of native slope was significant – ie influenced clinical outcome. We evaluated the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a series of consecutive total knee arthroplasties using the PFC sigma cruciate-retaining total knee system in 215 knees. The tibial bone cut was planned to be parallel to the patient's native anatomical slope in the sagittal plane. An “Angel Wing” instrument was placed on the lateral tibial plateau and the slope of the cutting guide adjusted to make the cutting block parallel to the patient's native tibial slope. All true lateral radiographs of the knee were measured for PTS using a picture achieving and communication system (PACS). PTSs were measured with reference to the proximal tibial medullary canal (PTS-M) and the proximal tibial anterior cortex (PTS-C). The knee ROM, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and SF-12 at the last follow-up were evaluated as clinical outcomes. The mean preoperative PTS-M was 6.9±3.3 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 7±2.4 degrees. The mean preoperative PTS-C was 12.2±4.2 degrees and the mean postoperative PTS-M was 12.6±3.4 degrees. There was no significant difference form the preoperative and postoperative PTS measurement in both techniques (p>0.05). We used an arbitrary 3 degrees as an acceptable range for PTS-M reproduction. The PTS-M was reproduced within 3 degrees in 144 knees (67%); designated as Group A. The 71 knees with a difference more than 3 degrees in (33%) were designated as Group B. Group A showed significantly larger gain in ROM compared with group B (p=0.04). Group A also had significantly better improvement in Knee society score and WOMAC score and SF-12 physical score when compare with group B (p<0.01). Our modification of standard surgical technique reliably reproduced the native tibial slope in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. More importantly, reproduction of the patient's native PTS within 3 degrees resulted in better clinical outcomes manifested by gain in ROM and knee functional outcome scores

Introduction. Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is generally considered successful, 16–30% of patients are dissatisfied. There are multiple reasons for this, but some of the most frequent reasons for revision are instability and joint stiffness. A possible explanation for this is that the implant alignment is not optimized to ensure joint stability in the individual patient. In this work, we used an artificial neural network (ANN) to learn the relation between a given standard cruciate-retaining (CR) implant position and model-predicted post-operative knee kinematics. The final aim was to find a patient-specific implant alignment that will result in the estimated post-operative knee kinematics closest to the native knee. Methods. We developed subject-specific musculoskeletal models (MSM) based on magnetic resonance images (MRI) of four ex vivo left legs. The MSM allowed for the estimation of secondary knee kinematics (e.g. varus-valgus rotation) as a function of contact, ligament, and muscle forces in a native and post-TKA knee. We then used this model to train an ANN with 1800 simulations of knee flexion with random implant position variations in the ±3 mm and ±3° range from mechanical alignment. The trained ANN was used to find the implant alignment that resulted in the smallest mean-square-error (MSE) between native and post-TKA tibiofemoral kinematics, which we term the dynamic alignment. Results. Dynamic alignment average MSE kinematic differences to the native knees were 1.47 mm (± 0.89 mm) for translations and 2.89° (± 2.83°) for rotations. The implant variations required were in the range of ±3 mm and ±3° from the starting mechanical alignment. Discussion. In this study we showed that the developed tool has the potential to find an implant position that will restore native tibiofemoral kinematics in TKA. The proposed method might also be used with other alignment strategies, such as to optimize implant position towards native ligament strains. If native knee kinematics are restored, a more normal gait pattern can be achieved, which might result in improved patient satisfaction. The small changes required to achieve the dynamic alignment do not represent large modifications that might compromise implant survivorship. Conclusion. Patient-specific implant position predicted with MSM and ANN can restore native knee function in a post-TKA knee with a standard CR implant

Background. The constraint of total knee replacement (TKR) implants is not simply defined and many of the factors that influence it are not well understood. Variability in the constraint of different TKR implants designed for the same indication (e.g. cruciate-retaining, or posterior-stabilized) have been previously demonstrated, but these differences among implants have yet to be simply quantified. Furthermore, the relative importance of several variables on the implant constraint remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantify the differences in constraint that exist between different implant designs, and to examine the effects of axial load and flexion angle on the constraint of current cruciate-retaining (CR) TKR components. Methods. Four contemporary CR TKR designs underwent laxity testing using a multi-axis mechanical test machine. Implants were tested at flexion angles of 0°, 20°, 90° and maximum flexion and axial loads of 712 N (1 BW) and 1424 N (2 BW). Friction-free motion in all secondary degrees of freedom was allowed. Force-displacement curves were generated for each testing condition in both anterior-posterior (AP) and rotational tests. AP constraint (N/mm) and rotational constraint (Nm/deg) were then calculated. Results. Differences in the AP and rotational constraint of the various implants were identified. The rotating platform implant was the most AP constrained and least rotationally constrained of the implants studied. Among the fixed bearing implants, NexGen CR had less AP and rotational constraint than the Genesis II and PFC Sigma. Doubling the applied axial load during the laxity tests resulted in a significant increase in both AP (p<0.0001) and rotational (p<0.0001) constraint. AP and rotational constraint decreased with increasing flexion angles. Conclusion. The constraints of four contemporary CR TKR designs were quantitatively compared and ranked according to their calculated constraints. Differences in the constraint of these designs were identified. This quantitative analysis is an important step towards the creation of a clinically meaningful constraint index that would aid surgeons in choosing the optimal implants for their TKR patients. Additionally, the analysis of the effects of axial load and flexion angle on constraint has implications which may influence how in vitro testing of implants is conducted as well as clinical implications in terms of how the constraint envelope of a given implant may influence the feel and function that a TKR patient experiences

We performed a prospective study of 54 patients (76 knees) who underwent Osteonics series 3000 cruciate-retaining cementless total knee arthroplasty between December 1990 and June 1993. Five patients (seven knees) were lost to follow-up (90.7% completion). One patient required revision at 10.5 years after operation. The rate of survival was 100% at ten years and 96.7% at 13 years. The mean ten-year knee and function scores were 79 and 59 respectively. Both were significantly better than the pre-operative scores. The range of movement also improved. Although a radiolucent line around the tibial component enlarged in six knees (20.7%) at ten years, the clinical outcome was generally good. In a patient who died after 5.5 years, post-mortem examination of the knee showed no bony ingrowth into the tibial component. Despite poor bony ingrowth, press-fit fixation was satisfactory and good results can be obtained with this cementless, cruciate-retaining prosthesis

Whether it is best to retain the posterior cruciate ligament in the degenerated knee, i.e. using a cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee prosthesis (TKP), or to use a more constraint posterior-stabilized (PS) TKP is of debate. There are limited studies comparing the effect of both methods on implant fixation and clinical outcome, leaving it up to the surgeon to base this decision on anything but conclusive evidence. We assessed the effect of two different philosophies in knee arthroplasty on clinical outcome and tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), by directly comparing the CR and PS version of an otherwise similarly designed cemented TKP. Sixty patients were randomized and received a Triathlon TKP (Stryker, NJ, USA) of either CR (n=30) or PS (n=30) design. RSA measurements (primary outcome) and clinical scores including the Knee Society Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were evaluated at baseline, at three months postoperatively and at one, two, five and seven years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the repeated measurements. Both groups showed a similar implant migration pattern, with a maximum total point motion at seven years follow-up of around 0.8 mm of migration (mean difference between groups 95% CI −0.11 to 0.15mm, p=0.842). Two components (one of each group) were considered to have an increased risk of aseptic loosening. Both groups improved equally after surgery on the KSS and KOOS scores and no differences were seen during the seven years of follow-up. No differences in implant migration nor clinical results were seen seven years after cruciate-retaining compared to posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses

Introduction. Maintaining posterior stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be achieved by using a posterior stabilized TKA, retaining and balancing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) using a traditional cruciate-retaining design (CR), or by increasing the sagittal plane conformity of the tibial insert. In the latter case, stability is achieved by the addition of an anterior buildup on the tibial polyethylene creating the so-called “anterior stabilized” (AS) design. We hypothesized that using an AS tibial insert would provide similar function and survivorship as compared to using a more traditional CR bearing when the PCL is either recessed or balanced. Methods. Between 2004 and 2016, 1,731 modular CR TKAs were implanted in 1,509 patients using the same CR TKA design. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 98%. 58% of patients were female. Average age of 64.9 years. Within this group, 868 TKAs (50.1%) had a standard CR tibial bearing (3-degree posterior slope and no posterior lip) implanted (CR-S). 480 TKAs (27.8%) had a lipped CR modular tibial bearing (2.5 mm elevated posterior lip) implanted (CR-L). Starting in 2013, 383 TKAs (22.1%) were implanted with an AS modular tibial bearing (9–11 mm anterior lip and a 5 mm posterior lip). If the PCL was considered non-functional or absent, an AS bearing was placed. If the PCL was considered functional, a standard bearing or lipped bearing was used. Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed according to the Knee Society (KS) grading system. The most recent clinical and radiographic evaluation was used for post-operative analysis. The average follow-up in the entire cohort of TKAs was 5.5 years (range 2 to 14.3 years). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine prosthesis survivorship with failure defined as aseptic loosening of the prosthesis (with or without revision) or tibial insert exchange. Results. At final follow-up, there were no significant differences in knee flexion, pain, function, or stair scores. Walking scores were significantly lower in the AS group. Posterior instability was higher in the CR-S group, whereas the manipulation rate was highest in the CR-L group (1.7% versus 1.3% and 0% in the CR-S and AS groups, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survivorship at five years, excluding infection, demonstrated no significant difference between the three groups (CR-S, CR-L, and AS tibial insert groups, 99% 100% and 99% respectively). Conclusion. When the PCL is considered non-functional at operation, the AS insert provided similar final flexion, function, stair score, and five-year survivorship when compared to using the standard and lipped CR tibial insert when the PCL was balanced. Using an ultra-congruent AS dished tibial component appears to be a reasonable option when the PCL is completely released or found deficient at operation. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

The aim of this study was to compare the maximum laxity conferred by the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilised (PS) Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for anterior drawer, varus–valgus opening and rotation in eight cadaver knees through a defined arc of flexion (0º to 110º). The null hypothesis was that the limits of laxity of CR- and PS-TKAs are not significantly different. The investigation was undertaken in eight loaded cadaver knees undergoing subjective stress testing using a measurement rig. Firstly the native knee was tested prior to preparation for CR-TKA and subsequently for PS-TKA implantation. Surgical navigation was used to track maximal displacements/rotations at 0º, 30º, 60º, 90º and 110° of flexion. Mixed-effects modelling was used to define the behaviour of the TKAs. . The laxity measured for the CR- and PS-TKAs revealed no statistically significant differences over the studied flexion arc for the two versions of TKA. Compared with the native knee both TKAs exhibited slightly increased anterior drawer and decreased varus-valgus and internal-external roational laxities. We believe further study is required to define the clinical states for which the additional constraint offered by a PS-TKA implant may be beneficial. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:642–8

Aims. This study compares the PFC total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in a prospective randomized control trial (RCT) of the mobile-bearing rotating-platform (RP) TKA against the fixed-bearing (FB) TKA. This is the largest RCT with the longest follow-up where cruciate-retaining PFC total knee arthroplasties are compared in a non-bilateral TKA study. Patients and Methods. A total of 167 patients (190 knees with 23 bilateral cases), were recruited prospectively and randomly assigned, with 91 knees receiving the RP and 99 knees receiving FB. The mean age was 65.5 years (48 to 82), the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m. 2. (20 to 52) and 73 patients were female. The Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Scores (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS) were gathered and recorded preoperatively, at five-years’ follow-up, and at ten years’ follow-up. Additionally, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected at five- and ten-year follow-ups. The prevalence of radiolucent lines (RL) on radiographs and implant survival were recorded at five- and ten-year follow-ups. Results. At the ten-year follow-up, the RP group (n = 39) had a statistically significant superior score in the OKS (p = 0.001), WOMAC (p = 0.023), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.019), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (p = 0.010), and KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (p = 0.006) compared with the FB group (n = 46). The OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS Sport/Rec at ten years had mean scores above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. There was no significant difference in prevalence of radiolucency between groups at five-years’ follow-up (p = 0.449), nor at ten-years’ follow-up (p = 0.08). Implant survival rate at 14 years postoperative was 95.2 (95% CI 90.7 to 99.8) and 94.7 (95% CI 86.8 to 100.0) for the RP and FB TKAs, respectively. Conclusion. At ten-year follow-up, the mobile-bearing knee joint arthroplasty had statistically and clinically relevant superior OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS (Sport/Rec) than the fixed-bearing platform. No difference was seen in prevalence of radiolucent lines. There was a greater than 94% implant survival rate for both cohorts at 14 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1336–44

Background. To prevent excessive tension on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA), some knee prosthesis-systems offer the option of creating a posterior slope for the tibial polyethylene insert. Vanguard® Complete Knee System offers two different types of tibial bearing for CR. -TKA. CR Lipped Bearing (LB) has a slightly raised posterior lip, whereas CR Standard Bearing (SB) is recessed downward at the posterior margin and has 3° posterior slope. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the tibial bearing slope on PCL load using the original devise in vivo conditions. Material and Methods. Twenty osteoarthritic varus knees were included in this study. After implantation of the trial components, PCL stiffness was measured using the original tension analyzer intra-operatively. Elastic modulus of PCL was calculated at 90 and 120 degrees knee flexion on two types of bearing surface. Results. Elastic modulus of PCL was 7.2±0.9 N/mm (mean±SE) at 90 degrees knee flexion, and 9.5±1.1 N/mm (mean±SE) at 120 degrees knee flexion with the Lipped Bearing (no slope). With the Standard Bearing (3 degrees posterior slope), elastic modulus decreased to 6.0±0.5 N/mm (mean±SE) at 120 degrees knee flexion. Discussion and Conclusion. Higher PCL stiffness was observed at 120 degrees knee flexion than 90 degrees knee flexion with Lipped Bearing surface (no slope), but using the Standard Bearing (3 degrees posterior slope), PCL stiffness decreased significantly at 120 degrees knee flexion. Therefore a posterior tibial slope of bearing insert prevents an excessive load on PCL at high knee flexion angles

Aims

Patient dissatisfaction is not uncommon following primary total knee arthroplasty. One proposed method to alleviate this is by improving knee kinematics. Therefore, we aimed to answer the following research question: are there significant differences in knee kinematics based on the design of the tibial insert (cruciate-retaining (CR), ultra-congruent (UC), or medial congruent (MC))?

INTRODUCTION. The medial-stabilised (MS) knee implant, characterised by a spherical medial condyle on the femoral component and a medially congruent tibial bearing, was developed to improve knee kinematics and stability relative to performance obtained in posterior-stabilised (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) designs. We aimed to compare in vivo six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) kinematics during overground walking for these three knee designs. METHODS. Seventy-five patients (42 males, 33 females, age 68.4±6.6 years) listed for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery were recruited to this study, which was approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics committees. Each patient was randomly- assigned a PS, CR or MS knee (Medacta International AB, Switzerland) resulting in three groups of 23, 26 and 26 patients, respectively. Patients visited the Biomotion Laboratory at the University of Melbourne 6±1.1 months after surgery, where they walked overground at their self-selected speed. A custom Mobile Biplane X-ray (MoBiX) imaging system tracked and imaged the implanted knee at 200 Hz. The MoBiX system measures 6-DOF tibiofemoral kinematics of TKA knees during overground gait with maximum RMS errors of 0.65° and 0.33 mm for rotations and translations, respectively. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. Mean walking speeds for the three groups were not significantly different (PS, 0.86±0.14 m/s CR, 0.82±0.17 m/s and MS, 0.87±0.14 m/s, p>0.25). While most kinematic parameters were similar for the PS and CR groups, mean peak-to-peak anterior drawer was greater for PS (9.89 mm) than CR (7.75 mm, p=0.004), which in turn was greater than that for MS (4.43 mm, p<0.001). Mean tibial external rotation was greater for MS than PS (by 3.12°, p=0.033) and CR (by 3.34°, p=0.029). Anterior drawer and lateral shift were highly coupled to external rotation for MS but not so for PS and CR. The contact centres on the tibial bearing translated predominantly in the anterior-posterior direction for all three designs. Peak-to-peak anterior-posterior translation of the contact centres in the medial compartment was largest for PS (7.09 mm) followed by CR (5.45 mm, p=0.003) and MS (2.89 mm, p<0.001). The contact centre in the lateral compartment was located 2.5 mm more laterally for MS than PS and CR (p<0.001). The centre of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane was located in the medial compartment for MS and in the lateral compartment for both PS and CR. CONCLUSIONS. We quantitatively compared in vivo 6-DOF joint motion for PS, CR, and MS knees during locomotion. A higher degree of coupling between external rotation and anterior-posterior translation, greater constraint in the anterior-posterior direction, and a more medialised joint centre of rotation observed for the MS knees are explained by the highly congruent medial articulation characterising this design

Purpose. This study was to investigate the effect of posterior tibial slope (PTS) on the kinematics in the cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) using 2- to 3- dimensional registration technique. Material & Methods. A total of 75 knees in 58 patients were recruited and categorized into the following two groups according to PTS. Group A was categorized PTS under 7degrees (n = 33) and group B was categorized PTS over 7 degrees (n = 42). The average age of group A and group B at the time of fluoroscopic surveillance date was 73.5 ± 7.4 years and 74.3 ± 4.5 years, respectively and the average follow-up period from operation date to fluoroscopic surveillance date was 13.8 ± 9.3 months and 16.7 ± 8.6 months, respectively. In vivo kinematics during sequential deep knee bending under weight-bearing condition were evaluated using fluoroscopic image analysis and 2- to 3- dimensional registration technique. Range of motion (ROM), axial rotation, anteroposterior (AP) translations of medial and lateral nearest points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component were measured and compared between the two groups. The nearest points were determined by calculating the closest distance between the surfaces of femoral component model and the axial plane of coordinate system of the tibial component. We defined external rotation and anterior translation as positive. P values under 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results. The mean PTS in group A and B were 5.5 ± 1.4°and 9.9 ± 1.9°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the degrees of axial rotation from 0° to 110° of flexion between the two groups (4.9 ± 4.2° vs 5.2 ± 4.2°, p > 0.05), respectively. The hyperextension of group B were significantly larger than group A (−2.3 ± 6.6°vs −9.8 ± 8.7°, p <0.05). The ROM of group B were significantly larger than group A (118.7 ± 10.8°vs 128.7 ± 17.7°, p <0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the maximum flexion between the two groups (116.4 ±10.8°vs 118.9±14.5°, p >0.05), respectively. In terms of AP translation, medial nearest points were located significantly more posterior at 0°, 10°, 30°, 40° of flexion in group B compared to group A. There was no significant difference in the location of lateral nearest points between the two groups during all knee range of motion. Discussion/Conclusion. The results shown in this study demonstrated that the PTS influenced the kinematics and ROM under weight-bearing condition in CR-TKA. The large PTS induced great posterior displacement of medial nearest points during early flexion phase and increased hyperextension between the femoral and tibial components

Introduction. Tibial slope was shown to majorly affect the outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). More slope of the tibial component could help releasing a too tight flexion gap in cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA and is generally associated with a wider range of post-operative knee flexion. However, an excessive tibial slope could jeopardize the knee stability in flexion. The mechanism by which tibial slope affects the function of CR-TKA is not well understood. Moreover, it is not known whether the tibial bone resection should be performed by referencing the anterior cortex (AC) of the tibia or the center of the tibial plateau (CP) and whether the choice of either technique plays a role. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tibial slope on the position of tibiofemoral (TF) contact point, knee ligament forces, quadriceps muscle forces, and TF and patellofemoral (PF) joint contact forces during squat activity in CR-TKA. Methods. A previously validated musculoskeletal model of CR-TKA was used to simulate a squat activity performed by a 86-year-old male subject wearing an instrumented prosthesis [1,2]. Marker data over four consecutive repetitions of a squat motion were tracked using a motion optimization algorithm. Muscle and joint forces and moments were calculated from an inverse-dynamic analysis, coupled with Force-Dependent Kinematics (FDK) to solve knee kinematics, ligament and contact forces simultaneously. The tibial slope in the postoperative case was 0 degree and constituted the reference case for our simulations. In addition, eight additional cases were simulated with −3, +3, +6, +9 degrees of tibial slope, four of them simulating an AC referencing technique and four a CP technique. Results. Compared to the reference case with no added slope, the total excursion of the tibiofemoral contact point increased on both medial and lateral side when more slope was added using the AC referencing technique, and decreased with negative slope. The total excursion of the contact point remained about unchanged when using the CP technique but the contact point shifted of about 1 mm more posteriorly, on the lateral side, and 0.7 mm, on the medial side, on average. In both AC and CP techniques the quadriceps forces, TF and PF contact forces decreased with more slope, but the PF contact forces were more drastically reduced using CP, with 3.5% less force every 3 degrees of added slope in flexion, on average. Medial and lateral collateral ligament became slack in flexion already with +6 degrees of slope when AC technique was used, whereas they always maintained some residual tension using the CP technique even at the highest slope. Discussion and conclusion. Increasing the tibial slope affected substantially the knee function during squatting and the effects differed depending on the referencing technique. The CP referencing helps preserving the flexion gap and knee stability in flexion, by mantaining tension in both collateral ligaments. It also reduces the quadriceps forces and relieves the PF joint contact forces, which could potentially decrease pain in patients with a TKA and achieve a wider range of knee motion

INTRODUCTION:. A discrepancy exists between biomechanical and clinical outcome studies when comparing cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS) component designs. The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate experimental model results using half-body specimens with intact extensor mechanisms and navigation to evaluate PS and CR component gaps though an entire range of motion. METHODS:. A custom-designed knee testing apparatus was used for secure anchoring of the lower half of cadaver pelvic, allowing full range of knee motion and the application of traction throughout that range. Eight sequential testing regimens: were conducted with knee intact, with CR TKA in place, with PS TKA with quadriceps tendon in place, with PS TKA with sectioned quadriceps tendon in place, with and without traction at each stage. At each stage, a navigated knee system with dedicated software was used to record component gapping through a full range of motion from 0° to 120°. The amount of traction used was 22N. Each knee (n = 10) was taken through 6 full ranges of motion at every stage. At each stage, corroboration of navigation findings was attempted using a modified gap balancer to take static gap measurements at 0° and 90° with 12 in. lbs of torque was applied. RESULTS:. The difference in component gapping between CR and PS knees resulted in a range from −0.85 mm to 0.62 mm. The range of component gapping was from −0.67 mm to 0.70 mm with both constructs under 22N traction load. There was no significant difference between loaded and unloaded component gaps, and there were no statistically significant differences in component gapping between CR and PS knees throughout a full range of motion. Static flexion-extension gap measurements, were significantly different from previously published data, notably at in 90° flexion gap measurement. The comparison of the sectioned unloaded and sectioned loaded quadriceps tendon constructs gave a range of distraction of tibio-femoral gaps from 1.85 to 5.22 mm and 1.46 to 4.60 mm, respectively. These measurements were significantly increased over previously reported findings. CONCLUSION:. There was no significant difference between the CR and PS TKA designs with respect to component gapping when measured through a complete range of motion with an intact extensor mechanism. This data contradicts earlier results, obtained from less complete specimens, and correlates with clinical studies which show no gap differences in CR and PS knees. We conclude that the sectioned quadriceps tendon influences knee flexion-extension gaps in a PS TKA construct model. This finding suggests that intact extensor mechanisms may be required to perform proper kinematic studies of TKA, and this may be a contributing factor in the discrepancies observed between previous biomechanical and clinical outcome studies. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study may solve the controversy regarding differences of the CR and PS TKA designs observed using biomechanical models