Recent Department of Health guidelines have recommended that bunion surgery should be performed as a day case in a bid to reduce hospital costs, yet concurrently improving patient outcomes. Following an audit in 2012/3, we implemented a number of measures in a bid to improve the rates of day case first ray surgery. In this paper, we look to see if these measures were effective in reducing the length of stay in first ray surgery. We performed a prospective case note review of all patients undergoing first ray surgery between 01/01/2012 and 01/02/2013, and found the rates of same day discharge in this group to be lower than expected at just 24.19%. We recognised that the most commonly cited reasons for delayed discharge were that patients not being assessed by physiotherapy, and were unable to have their take home medication (TTO's) dispensed as pharmacy had closed. To address this, we implemented a pre-operative therapy led foot school, and organised ward analgesia packs which may be dispensed by ward staff, thus bypassing the need for pharmacy altogether. Together, we coined the term “care package” for these measures. We then performed a post implementation audit between 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2015 to ascertain if these measures had been effective. We identified 62 first ray procedures in the preliminary audit, with an average age of 50.5 years (range 17–78 years) and a M:F ratio of 1:5. The most commonly performed procedures were Scarf osteotomy, 1st MTPJ fusion, and distal Chevron osteotomy. We compared this to 63 first ray procedures post implementation of the care package. The average age was 55.3 years (range 15–78 years) and the M:F ratio was 1:2.5, and there was a similar distribution in terms of specific procedures. We found the length of stay had reduced from 1.00 to 0.65 days (p= 0.0363), and the rate of same day discharge had increased from 24.6% to 44.6% (p= 0.0310). We also noted that St Helens Hospital (SHH), the dedicated day case surgery unit, had a significantly increased rate of same day discharge than Whiston Hospital (WH- the main hospital) at 87.5% and 28.89% respectively (p= 0.0002). Preoperative physiotherapy assessment is an important tool in reducing length of stay for first ray surgery. The use ward analgesia packs has a synergistic effecting in increasing day case first ray surgery. We therefore commend its use to other centers. Additionally, we have shown dedicated day case surgery units are more effective at achieving same day discharge than general hospitals

Introduction/aims. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is now routinely performed arthroscopically. However, there are only a few centres in the UK which offer this procedure as a day case. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of day case ACL reconstruction using a tourniquet-less pump regulated procedure. Material/methods. A retrospective analysis of day case ACL reconstructions by a single surgeon between January 2003 and December 2010 was undertaken. All reconstructions were performed without a tourniquet, instead, haemostasis was achieved using saline – epinephrine irrigation. Outcomes were measured using Lysholm knee scores, Mohtadi index and pain scores. Results. 374 ACL reconstructions were performed on 331 patients (288 unilateral, 43 bilateral) during the study period. The average age was 31 years (range 15–58 years). All patients were followed up at regular intervals for 12 months. Lysholm knee scores improved from an average of 25 to 90. Mohtadi index scores also showed significant improvement; from an average of 22 to 90 post-operatively. All patients were pain free by 6 weeks post ACL reconstruction based on the VAP score. Complications occurred in 3% (n=11) of patients, these included DVT, wound infection and haemoarthorosis. Metal work failure occurred in 2 patients, both of whom had the EZLoc™ fixation system. Conclusions. Our experience shows that day case ACL reconstructions without the use of a tourniquet are cost effective, safe and the patients' preferred choice. Perhaps, therefore, it is time to include ACL reconstructions in the British Association of Day Case Surgery “basket” of day case procedures?

Background. Despite interest, the current rate of day-case anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the UK remains low. Although specialised care pathways with standard operating procedures (SOPs) have been effective in reducing length of stay following some surgical procedures, this has not been previously reported for ACLR. We evaluate the effectiveness of SOPs for establishing day-case ACLR in a specialist unit. Methods. Fifty patients undergoing ACLR between May and September 2010 were studied prospectively (“study group”). SOPs were designed for pre-operative assessment, anaesthesia, surgical procedure, mobilisation and discharge. We evaluated length of stay, readmission rates, patient satisfaction and compliance to SOPs. A retrospective analysis of 50 patients who underwent ACLR prior to implementation of the day-case pathway was performed (“standard practice group”). Results. Eighty percent of patients in the study group were discharged on the day of surgery (mean length of stay=5.3 h) compared to 16% in the standard practice group (mean length of stay=21.6 h). This difference was statistically significant (p< 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). All patients were satisfied with the day case pathway. Ninety-two percent of the study group were discharged on the day of surgery when all SOPs were followed and 46% where they were not. Conclusion. High rates of day-case ACLR with excellent patient satisfaction can be achieved with the use of a specialised patient pathway with SOPs

There has been a significant increase in the demand for arthroplasty as a result of the Covid 19 pandemic and lack of beds on the green pathway. The average length of in-hospital stay following knee replacements has been successfully reduced over the years following introduction and adoption of enhanced recovery protocols. Day case arthroplasty has the potential to be efficient as well as cost-effective. We present our day case pathway for elective knee arthroplasty and early results of its adoption at a district general hospital. Our pathway was developed through a multidisciplinary input from surgeons, anaesthetists, physiotherapists, nursing staff, administrative staff, surgical care practitioners and pharmacists. Inclusion criteria were defined to identify patients suitable for cay case arthroplasty. Results of 32 patients who underwent day case partial and total knee replacement at our institution between 2018 to 2022 are presented. 31 out of 32 (97%) were discharged safely on the day of surgery. Patients were discharged at a mean of 7 hours following surgery. There were no re-admissions following discharge. There were no surgical complications at a mean follow-up of 2 years. Patient feedback revealed high levels of satisfaction and that they would recommend the pathway to others. Cost analysis revealed savings towards bed costs. Our early results demonstrate day case knee arthroplasty to be safe and cost effective. With limited resources to tackle the enormous backlog of arthroplasty, it offers the potential to make theatre utilization efficient

As Total Hip Replacement (THR) rates increase healthcare providers have sought to reduce costs, while at the same time improving patient safety and satisfaction. Up to 50% of patients may be appropriate for Day Case THR, and in appropriately selected patients’ studies show no increase in complication rate while affording a significant cost saving and maintaining a high rate of patient satisfaction. Despite the potential benefits, levels of adoption of Day Case THR vary. A common cause for this is the perception that doing so would require the adoption of new surgical techniques, implants, or theatre equipment. We report on a Day-Case THR pathway in centres with an established and well-functioning Enhanced Recovery pathway, utilising the posterior approach and standard implants and positioning. We prospectively collected the data on consecutive THRs performed by a single surgeon between June 2018 and July 2021. A standardised anaesthetic regimen using short acting spinal was used. Surgical data included approach, implants, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Outcome data included time of discharge from hospital, post operative complications, readmissions, and unscheduled health service attendance. Data was gathered on 120 consecutive DCTHRs in 114 patients. 93% of patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. Four patients required re-admission: one infection treated with DAIR, one dislocation, one wound ooze admitted for a day of monitoring, one gastric ulcer. One patient had a short ED attendance for hypertension. Our incidence of infection, dislocation and wound problems were similar to those seen in inpatient THR. Out data show that the widely used posterior approach using standard positioning and implants can be used effectively in a Day Case THR pathway, with no increase in failure of same-day discharge or re-admission to hospital

Introduction. W. ide . A. wake . L. ocal . A. naesthetic . N. o . T. ourniquet (WALANT) is a well- established day case procedure for carpal tunnel release with several advantages and enhanced post-operative recovery. Use of Local anaesthesia with Adrenaline using a 27G needle allows a bloodless field and distraction techniques achieve patient comfort during the procedure. Objectives. This retrospective, observational cohort study assesses patient satisfaction and undertakes functional evaluation using the validated Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) following WALANT technique for carpal tunnel release (CTR). The BCTQ has a symptom severity scale based on 11 items and a functional status scale of 8 elements. Further we compare surgical outcomes between techniques of WALANT and traditional CTR. Patient and Methods. We included 30 consecutive patients, 15 in each arm who either underwent traditional CTR with the use of Tourniquet or with the WALANTtechnique. Data was collected from Electronic Patient Records and hand therapy assessments. A satisfaction questionnaire and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was utilized to evaluate subjective outcomes. Functional outcomes was assessed by BCTQ scoring system and clinical review. Microsoft Excel was used for analysis. Results. 100% of patients in the WALANT group stated they were satisfied with the operation. Relief from night pain and sleep disturbance were the most improved symptoms. BCTQ and clinical assessment evaluation between both groups revealed comparable results with no significant difference. Conclusion. With advantages of no tourniquet related pain, increased patient satisfaction and functional outcomes on the BCTQ scores, WALANT technique has the potential to be the standard technique for CTR

Literature has suggested that obese (BMI >30) and morbidly obese (BMI > 35) patients should not be offered surgery as a day case due to increases in complication and readmission rates. At Torbay hospital, patients are routinely offered day case surgery, in a specialist day case unit, regardless of BMI. This is done with minimal complications and enables a higher throughput of patients and at least 75% of surgical procedures to be performed as a day case, as per NHS guidelines. We present 12 year data of day case knee arthroscopy surgery performed at Torbay hospital. Over 12 years, 3421 knee arthroscopies were performed. 649 were performed on obese patients and 222 on morbidly obese patients. No anaesthetic complications were observed in any of the obese patient groups and readmissions rates (up to 28 days) were 0.8% in the morbidly obese group and 0.9% in the Obese group, compared to 0.9% for patients with BMI <30. Our data shows that day case surgery can be performed on all patients regardless of BMI and patient obesity. We believe that other units should offer surgery to obese and morbidly obese patients to allow increased efficiency and achievement of NHS day case guidelines

Aims. Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a ‘hidden burden’ that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals. Methods. Retrospective data were collected between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020 and compared with the same nine-month period the previous year. Data collected included surgeries performed (day-case vs inpatient), number of patients currently on the orthopaedic waiting list (day-case vs inpatient), and number of new patient referrals from primary care and therapy services. Results. There was a 52.8% reduction in our elective surgical workload in 2020. The majority of surgeries performed in 2020 were day case surgeries (739; 86.6%) with 47.2% of these performed in the independent sector on a ‘lift and shift’ service. The total number of patients on our waiting lists has risen by 30.1% in just 12 months. As we have been restricted in performing inpatient surgery, the inpatient waiting lists have risen by 73.2%, compared to a 1.6% rise in our day-case waiting list. New patient referral from primary care and therapy services have reduced from 3,357 in 2019 to 1,722 in 2020 (49.7% reduction). Conclusion. This study further exposes the increasing number of patients on orthopaedic waiting lists. We observed disparities between inpatient and day-case waiting lists, with dramatic increases in the number of inpatients on the waiting lists. The number of new patient referrals has decreased, and we predict an influx of referrals as the pandemic eases, further adding to the pressure on inpatient waiting lists. Robust planning and allocation of adequate resources is essential to deal with this backlog. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):530–534

Background. Benefits of day case foot and ankle surgery includes reduced hospital stay, associated cost savings for the hospital, high patient satisfaction and quicker recovery with no increase in complication rates. In 2007, we set up the preoperative foot and ankle group. Patients were seen three weeks before surgery by a specialist nurse, physiotherapist and a preoperative evaluation is done. The therapist explains the patient's weightbearing status and advices on how to carry this out. Our aim was to reduce inpatient hospital stay and increase our day case procedures. Methods. We evaluated length of stay and physiotherapy intervention for all our patients during the first three months of 2007 to 2011. Mean length of stay was calculated and Mann-Whitney U test was performed using median. Results. Mean length of stay for combined forefoot and midfoot group reduced by 1.92 days and median reduction was statistically significant(p< 0.01). For forefoot surgery alone, the mean length reduced by 2.14 and median reduction was significant(p< 0.001) and for midfoot surgery alone, the mean stay reduced by 1.34 days and median was significant (p< 0.001). Hind foot patient's mean length of stay reduced by 6.78 days and the median was significant (p< 0.001). But for the ankle group the mean length of stay did reduce but the median was not statistically significant (p=0.225). Day case surgery increased by 43.5% for forefoot, 23.2% for midfoot and 14% for ankle surgeries but not for hindfoot. Conclusions. The overall results show that the preoperative foot and ankle group has resulted in reduction of inpatient stay and increase in daycase surgery performed. A pre-operative group is a highly efficient method of enhancing patient care and improving length of stay at the hospital for the patient. The cost saving for the hospital is around £35,400 per annum

Introduction. Extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) transfer is a useful method for treating chronic ankle instability in selected patients. It adds strength to the anterolateral capsule and provides proprioceptive feedback to functionally unstable ankles. Method. A single surgeon of case series of patients undergoing EDB transfer for chronic ankle instability following sporting injuries between January 2003 and July 2011 was reviewed. All patients underwent arthroscopic procedures in a day case setting. Outcomes were measured using return to sporting activity and the Karlsson functional scoring system. Results. 67 patients underwent unilateral EDB transfer over the 102 month period. 49 patients were male and all patients were aged less than 45. Minimum follow up was 6 months and all patients were discharged by 15 months (median follow up 9 months). Post operative assessment demonstrated normal range of ankle movements in all cases. At 6 months all patients had returned to sporting activity, achieving pre injury activity by 9 months. Karlsson scores were above 85.3 minor complications were seen - a superficial wound infection, limited paraesthesia of a branch of the superficial peroneal nerve and a case of complex regional pain syndrome which underwent full remission with early multimodal therapy. Conclusion. This study forms the largest published single surgeon series for EDB transfers. The data contributes to the body of evidence supporting EDB transfers as a safe and effective day case procedure for treatment of chronic ankle instability in selected patients

In the young and highly active population of military patients, femoroacetabular impingement can be a source of serious disability as well as a threat to their career. This morbidity can be treated with hip arthroscopy with debridement of cam lesion, and excision or repair of a corresponding labral tear. We report on the long term outcomes (>1 year) of 26 military cases who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, in a single surgeon's series. Twenty two patients (four bilateral cases) underwent hip arthroscopy as a day case procedure during the period February 2013 to October 2014. Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS) were obtained from patients pre-operatively, at two months, four months and at least one year post-operatively. There was a significant improvement in NAHS at two months (75.6)(p<0.05), four months (85.1)(p<0.001) and one year (84.8)(p<0.001), compared to pre-operative NAHS (65.8). There was no significant change in NAHS beyond four months. Only three out of the 22 patients were medically discharged secondary to persistent hip symptoms. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is an effective, viable procedure for military patients. Mobility, pain and function is significantly improved after surgery. This improvement is sustained in the long term up to and beyond one year

Osseous first ray surgery is a common day case procedure. Patients are often given regional blocks. We sought to find if there is a difference between ankle block and metatarsal block in this group of patients. After ethical approval was granted and power analysis performed, 25 patients were recruited into each arm of the study. These patients were having either an osteotomy or arthrodesis. All patients had standardised general anaesthesia and received 20mls of 0.5% chirocaine for the blockade. The cohort having the ankle block had infiltration under ultrasound guidance in the anaesthetic room; and the cohort receiving the metatarsal block had infiltration at the end of the procedure. The timings of both the anaesthesia and the operation were recorded for each patient. Patients scored their pain level at 2, 6 and 24 hours. The amount of post-operative analgesia used in the first 24 hours was also recorded by the research nurse. All patients were discharged home with a standardised prescription of analgesia. Analysis of the pain scores showed that there was no difference between the two blocks at any measured time period. Nor was there a difference in the analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours. There was, however, a difference in the time taken for the whole procedure: with the ankle block taking an average of ten minutes more. We conclude that metatarsal blocks are as effective as ankle blocks in providing pain relief after osseous first ray surgery, and may be a more efficient use of time

Aims

The aim of this study was to surveil whether the standard operating procedure created for the NHS Golden Jubilee sufficiently managed COVID-19 risk to allow safe resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery.

Unicompartmental knee replacements offer improved function with more rapid recovery compared to TKR. There is no published experience with introducing this procedure as a day case in the UK. We report on our experience with a new protocol allowing the patient to be discharged on the day of surgery. A new combination of anaesthetic and surgical techniques are employed. Paracetamol, ibuprofen and pregabalin are given pre-operatively. Patients receive a GA and a subsartorial saphenous nerve block is administered under ultrasound control. The surgery is performed using a routine minimally invasive technique. The joint and surrounding tissues are infiltrated with a combination of LA and adrenaline. Wound closure is with subcutaeneous suture and tissue glue. Patients are mobilised on the day of surgery and if comfortable discharged on paracetamol, codeine, ibuprofen, tramadol P.R.N and buprenorphine patch. Length of stay, pain scores, presence of nausea/vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, post-operative bleeding and patient satisfaction are all recorded. 18 out of 19 patients have been discharged on the day of surgery. All record high satisfaction. Patients can be safely discharged on the day of surgery after UKR with high levels of satisfaction. We believe we are the first unit in the UK to achieve this

Aims

Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in shoulder operations is rare although a few case reports exist. No definite guidelines exist and therefore it is difficult for the surgeon to decide on thromboprophylaxis. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of DVT following arthroscopic shoulder sub acromial decompression in 72 patients after obtaining local ethics committee approval. Patients with previous history of DVT and those on anticoagulants were excluded from the study. Pre and post-operative Doppler scans on 4 limbs were performed by a single consultant radiologist at an average of 3 weeks. All operations were performed by a single surgeon under GA in beach chair position as a day case procedure on standard lines. Postoperatively the shoulder was immobilised in a sling for comfort and physiotherapy was supervised by a qualified therapist. No patient received any DVT prophylaxis. The average age of 54.6 years, 47 were classified as ASA 1, 15 as ASA 2 and 10 ASA 3.58 patients had additional interscalene nerve blocks for pain relief. The average operating time was 43 mins. Additional procedures included excision of lateral clavicle in 32, glenoid labral and rotator cuff debridement in 12 and 14 patients. There were no DVTs on Doppler scans. Shoulder arthroscopic sub acromial decompression procedures do not carry a risk of DVT and routine thromboprohylaxis is not required even in higher anaesthetic risk patients

Osteoarticular loss in a major weightbearing joint is one of the many consequences of military conflict. While minor in terms of life and limb salvage, when rehabilitation is being planned, a small amount of joint damage can make a large impact on the level of long term disability. Reconstruction methods include allograft, massive replacement, arthrodesis and amputation. We have been developing a suite of technologies that contribute to the reconstruction of such injuries including assessment of disability in a fully instrumented gait lab, modelling of the injury using low dose CT, analysis of the extent of loss and creation of stereolithograph files of the bones, planning of the surgical procedure including implants as needed, custom manufacture of osteotomy guides and prostheses if required and technology assisted surgery, including active constraint robots. We report 3 cases of soldiers who have suffered osteoarticular loss to part of the knee, two from high velocity rounds and one from an IED. All 3 have received custom partial knee replacements preserving their cruciates, the other compartment and the patella-femoral joint. No major technical issues have been encountered. The surgery is quick and recovery simple, with the prospect of normal painfree pedestrian life. Exchange of the bearing will be necessary. It is expected and planned for once a decade as a day case procedure. While the surgery is expensive, it is highly cost-effective, as it restores near normal gait. It does not appear to be particularly risky, as the volume of tissue being excised is small, and highly constrained. The same approach is now being developed for deployment in civilian life for post traumatic osteoarthritis

Hospital Episode Statistics [HES] are often used by hospital managers and politicians as a reflection of departmental workload. The accuracy of these data is often questioned. We aimed to ascertain the reliability of this database for trauma admissions. Between 2002 and 2003, all admissions were recorded by doctors using a separate departmental database. Data were collected during the daily trauma meetings and compared with the HES returns for the same period. 2496 patients were recorded in the trauma admissions database. Overall, 36.4% of the patients were either not recorded by the HES database or wrongly coded in terms of type of admissions or diagnosis. HES data for all 2496 records was analysed by type of admissions and speciality.4.2% of trauma patients were incorrectly classified as elective or day cases. 2.9% of trauma patients admitted to hospital were not recorded in the HES data as orthopaedic admission. The accuracy of HES diagnosis coding was tested on 300 records randomly selected by a statistical package. HES recorded the wrong diagnosis in 29.3% of cases. A significant number of trauma cases were not counted in the HES data. This may have significant implications for trauma funding. HES data does not accurately record diagnosis and therefore can not be used as a research tool for specific injuries. Data recording practice should be changed to improve HES data accuracy

Introduction. The aim of the study was to compare and contrast the clinical outcome of conversion of practice of a shoulder surgeon from open to arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Patients and Methods. Comparison of a cohort consecutive series of 24 patients treated by open stabilisation and a prospective consecutive cohort series of 30 patients treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Oxford Shoulder Score Instability (OSS-I) and a Patient Satisfaction Survey at a minimum of 1 year follow up. The operation time as well as cost analysis were also evaluated. Results. The average OSS-I for open stabilisation was 39.6 (range 19-48) as compared to 39.8 (range 23-48) with the arthroscopic group and these scores did not show a statistically significant difference. Both cohorts were pleased with the clinical outcome and were happy to recommend the procedure to others. No complications in either group were seen. Operative time and costs were significantly more in the open group, even taking into account initial learning curve of the arthroscopic method. All arthroscopic procedures were performed as day-cases compared to over-night stays for the open group also providing better use of hospital resources and cost savings. Conclusion. After appropriate surgical training, the conversion from open to arthroscopic stabilisation can be performed without affecting clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. This study provides surgeons with confidence to change methods to gain the advantages of the arthroscopic procedure, which included reduced theatre time, day case surgery and earlier return to work and sport

Introduction. Theatre cancellation is unpleasant experience to patient and it is expensive to service provider. There are various causes for cancellation which are avoidable and unavoidable as well. Nationwide, there has been several measures put in place to reduce avoidable theatre cancellations. We describe retrospective review of 158 cancellations and root cause analysis & solutions in relation to the National standard. Material & Method. Retrospective review of all orthopaedic theatre cancellations, both elective and trauma cases, case notes & registry review as made for the period of 1st of August 2007 to 2005 to 31. st. of March 2009 in Bassetlaw Hospital. Data was collected and analysed. Results. Total Number of Operation -3315. Time of cancellation –. Same Day of Operation 157. Day before operation 1. Total Number of cancellation – 158. Total Number of IP – 66. Total Number of Day cases – 92. Almost all cancellations were on same day. All cancellations are in Theatre. Majority are cancellation by the anesthetist in charge. Conclusion. Theatre cancellation is expensive and unpleasant experience both to the patient and the surgeon. From root cause analysis we found avoidable proportion of - 76.6%. No link was found on pre-assessment clinic to avert the cancellations. We recommend Managerial improvement in theatre especially in the following highlight points. Instrument handling and packaging. Early communication of anaesthetist and surgeon involved. Early admission time for surgery. Increase awareness to theatre manager and to follow the performance indices