Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.

Aims

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

Introduction. Decompression is the gold standard surgical technique in patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis not responding to conservative management. We present an audit of outcomes in a population of patients undergoing this procedure over a four year period. Method. All patients undergoing lumbar decompression were assessed preoperatively and between 4 and 12 months postoperatively using the Oswestry Disabilty Index (ODI %), pain scale (0–10) and patient satisfaction. The patient's age, the number of levels decompressed and the incidence of complications were recorded. Results. Data is expressed as mean ±SD. Of 127 patients 112 were available for follow up. Mean age at surgery was 68.8±11.8 years. 55% of patients had a single level decompression, 36% 2 levels, 9% 3 levels. L4/5 was the most frequently decompressed level (51%) Improvement in ODI was 13.9±11.7(p<0.0001), improvement in pain scores 2.9±3.0 (p<0.0001). Improvement was the same regardless of number of levels decompressed (ANOVA p=0.84). There was no association between outcome and age. Dural tears occurred in 8.9% of patients, with post operative infection in 2.7%. The presence or absence of post operative complications did not significantly affect outcome. Based on outcome 87% of patients were happy with their surgical experience and outcome. Conclusion. Lumbar decompression remains an effective treatment for stenosis by improving ODI and pain scores. Age and number of decompression levels do not influence outcome. There is a high level of patient satisfaction with the procedure

We carried out a prospective study looking at the functional outcome and post-procedure segmental instability after lumbar decompression using a flip osteotomy technique that involved unilateral subperiosteal muscle dissection with hinging of the spinous processes thereby preserving the integrity of the posterior elements for unilateral or bilateral lumbar spine decompression. Between February 2007 and February 2008, 51 patients (29 male and 22 female) diagnosed with degenerative and congenital lumbar stenosis with an average age of 60, underwent central and lateral canal decompression using the flip osteotomy technique. An average of two segments (range 1-3 segments) was decompressed. Patients with a history of previous spinal surgery, spinal fusion, existing degenerative spondylolisthesis or cauda equina syndrome were excluded. All patients were followed up for a mean of 1.5 years. Five outcome measures were used – visual analogue scale for pain, Likert scale for functional status, symptom specific well-being score, general well-being score, number of days incapacitated in last 4 weeks. The outcomes measures were recorded pre-operatively, 6 weeks and one year post-operatively. Successful surgical outcome was defined as an improvement in at least four out of five outcome measures. 90% (46 patients) of patients had a successful surgical outcome. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome criteria (p<0.005) at the 6-week post-operative mark as compared to pre-operatively, with marginal improvement at one year post-surgery. There was no evidence of progressive lumbar segmental instability at one year post-operatively using our flip osteotomy technique. Decompression of the lumbar spine for lumbar stenosis using the flip osteotomy technique is a safe approach for one or multi-level stenosis with good outcomes and no evidence of significant iatrogenic segmental spinal instability. We declare no conflict of interest and ethical approval was obtained

The use of interspinous distraction devices should remain the subject of audit and research. They are a relatively new addition to the armamentarium of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The reported results are variable and there are a number of different devices available. It is recognised that there is an early failure rate with interspinous distraction devices. This is a report of the clinical results after conversion to segmental lumbar decompression following a failure of interspinous distraction procedure.

18 patients had removal of device and conversion to a standard lumbar decompression at an average of 13 months after the index procedure. There were 7 females and 11 males. The average age was 68 years (range 49-85). The two youngest patients had a decompression and instrumented fusion, the others had decompression alone. Prior to the Index procedure of stand alone interspinous distraction device the average Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was 42 and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) leg 7.2. Prior to revision the average ODI was 42 and VAS leg 6.7.

Complications: One intra operative myocardial infarction, one incidental durotomy and one post operative infection (pseudomonas isolated).

At a mean of 9 months follow up the average ODI was 23 and VAS leg 2.1. The VAS back was 1.9. The walking distance was subjectively reported as 246 yards pre op and 1100 yards post procedure. There was a clinically significant improvement in all patients.

A failed interspinous distraction device can be satisfactorily salvaged with a segmental lumbar decompression.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI).

Aim. To assess the safety of Zero Profile Interbody fusion (Zero P) device in Anterior Cervical Decompression and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical stenosis. Method. 89 consecutive patients treated with Zero P interbody device from September 2009 to September 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criterion: degenerative cervical stenosis with myelopathy, persistent radiculopathy after at least 3 months of failed conservative management. Exclusion criterion: Paediatric population; patients with infection, metastatic disease and trauma. There were 39 females, 50 males with mean age of 55 (ranging from 24 to 84 years). 56 (64%) had surgery at 1 level, 31 (35%) at 2 levels, 1 (1%) at 3 levels. Total number of levels operated were 121. Common levels operated were C56 (62%) and C67 (47%). Majority were operated due to radicular symptoms, 56 (64%) had radicular symptoms, 28(31%) had myelopathy and 5 (5%) Myeloradiculopathy. Results. All had a minimum of 6 months follow up (maximum 2 years). No patient had cage subsidence or extrusion. 1 had superficial infection which settled with antibiotics, 10 (11%) had dysphagia which settled in 6 to12 weeks. Conclusions. Our study demonstrates that ACDF with Zero P can be considered a safe option in management of patients with cervical degenerative stenosis. We would will also recommend a prospective randomised study as a follow on to this retrospective study. Preoperative kyphosis or lordosis did not change the outcome or make the surgical technique any more difficult, hence this implant can also be used in these circumstances. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Endoscopic spine surgery is a promising and minimally invasive technique for the treatment of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. However, the literature on the outcome of interlaminar endoscopic decompression (IED) versus conventional microsurgical technique (CMT) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is scarce. We analyzed 88 patients (IED: 36/88, 40.9%; CMT: 52/88, 59.1%) presenting with lumbar central spinal stenosis between 2018–2020. Surgery-related (operation time, complications, time to hospital release (THR), ASA score, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), side (unilateral/bilateral), patient-reported (ODI, NRS (leg-, back pain), eQ5D, COMI), and radiological (preoperative dural sack cross-sectional area (DSCA), Shizas score (SC), left (LRH) and right (RRH) lateral recess heights, left (LFA) and right (RFA) facet angle) parameters were extracted.

Complication (most often re-stenosis due to hematoma and/or residual sensorimotor deficits) rates were higher in the endoscopic (38.9%) than microsurgical (13.5%) treatment group (p<0.01). Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively evaluated ODI, COMI, eQ5D, NRS leg, or NRS back values in our cohort. We did not observe significant differences in the endoscopic versus microsurgical group for the patient-reported outcomes.

Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with patient-centered outcomes and should be considered in future studies. Endoscopic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis was similarly successful as the conventional microsurgical approach, although it was associated with higher complication rates in our single-center study experience. This was probably because of the surgeons' lack of experience with this method and the resulting different learning curve compared with the conventional technique.

Whether to combine spinal decompression with fusion in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis remains controversial. We performed a cohort study to determine the effect of the addition of fusion in terms of patient satisfaction after decompressive spinal surgery in patients with and without a degenerative spondylolisthesis.

The National Swedish Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine) was used for the study. Data were obtained for all patients in the register who underwent surgery for stenosis on one or two adjacent lumbar levels. A total of 5390 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed a two-year follow-up. Using multivariable models the results of 4259 patients who underwent decompression alone were compared with those of 1131 who underwent decompression and fusion. The consequence of having an associated spondylolisthesis in the operated segments pre-operatively was also considered.

At two years there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the two treatment groups for any of the outcome measures, regardless of the presence of a pre-operative spondylolisthesis. Moreover, the proportion of patients who required subsequent further lumbar surgery was also similar in the two groups.

In this large cohort the addition of fusion to decompression was not associated with an improved outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:960–5.

Aim

To assess the safety of day case lumbar decompressive surgery

Introduction

Cauda Equina is a condition requiring urgent operative intervention to avoid debilitating long term neurological compromise. The recommended maximium time delay before lack of surgical decompression results in persisting neurological deficit has been suggested to be 24 hrs and more recent studies have even indicated 48 hours as acceptable. We wanted to assess if any persisting neurological deficit occurred in our practice when treated at 12 hours or less.

Background

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis is now typically treated by decompression and instrumented fusion. This treatment method does produce predictable results at the spondylolisthetic level, but later stenosis will occur commonly at the adjacent level due to the rigidity of the construct. Pedicle screw fusion may also be a significantly invasive procedure for an elderly patient.

Patients with neurogenic claudication from lumbar canal stenosis non-responsive to non-surgical treatment are usually managed with spinal decompression with or without fusion. Flexion at stenotic segments relieves symptoms by increasing canal cross-sectional area, intervertebral foraminal height. Interspinous spacers work by causing flexion at the treated segement. We used COFLEX¯ [Paradigm Spine] a titanium interspinous spacer along with interlaminar decompression where indicated.

To compare the clinical and radiological results of patients undergoing interlaminar decompression with or without use of COFLEX¯.

Pre and post-operative assessment and comparison of clinical outcomes of Oswestry disability index(ODI), Visual analog Scale(VAS), Short Form-36(SF-36) and radiological outcomes of disc heights of operated and adjacent levels, intervertebral foraminal heights, sagittal angles of the operated segment.

All consecutive patients undergoing spinal decompression at one or more levels from Jan to Dec 2008 were included. Patients with clinically symptomatic back pain for a duration longer than claudication pain were offered interspinous spacer at L4/5 level or above.

In first group(n-20), patients were treated with inter-laminar decompression and COFLEX¯ with a standard posterior approach. In second group(n-25) inter-laminar decompression for the involved segment was performed. All patients are on follow-up.

Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared at 6 months and 1 year.

Statistically significant(p<0.001) improvements in ODI, VAS(back), VAS(leg) and SF-36 in patients in whom COFLEX¯ was used. Radiological parameters also showed significant improvements(p<0.05).

Use of COFLEX¯ spacer is justified in patients with symptomatic disc degeneration with neurogenic claudication when treated operatively.

Anterior only procedure for stable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures is controversial.

Prospective collection of clinical and radiological data in stable burst fractures with neurological deficit undergoing anterior only decompression and stabilisation with 2-year follow-up.

14 consecutive patients (8 females, 6 males) with two-column thoracolumbar burst fracture and neurological deficit underwent anterior corpectomy/hemi-corpectomy and instrumentation, from February 2007 to February 2009.

Radiological data included classification of fracture (AO classification), kyphus angle and degree of canal compromise. Post-operative CT scans done to assess radiological improvement.

Clinical data included neurological deficit at presentation, improvement or changes in neurology, length of surgery, estimated blood loss, post-operative complications and length of stay.

Commonest mechanism was fall from height. 10 patients had incomplete burst fractures amenable to hemi-corpectomy. 8 of our patients were ASIA D, 4 were ASIA C or lower. They all improved by at least one grade. 2 patients had identical ASIA grade pre and post operatively. Pre-operative spinal canal compromise averaged 52.6% and vertebral body height loss averaged 48.9%. The mean kyphotic angles improved from 19.6° to 7.9 °. There were two cases with minor injury to the diaphragm, one developing a pneumothorax. Mean length of surgery and hospital stay were 4hours and 21minutes and 11.8 days respectively.

The fractures in which the top part is burst and causing canal compromise, could be dealt with by top hemi-corpectomy requiring smaller approach. One stage anterior – only stabilization can yield successful clinical results.

Lumbar spine foraminal stenosis has previously been defined by the foraminal and posterior disc height. We performed a study to determine whether residual clinically significant foraminal stenosis correlates with foraminal dimensions and peri-neural fat signal loss in a group of patients with leg pain undergoing surgery for lateral recess stenosis. We retrospectively studied the pre-operative para-sagittal MRI slices of 57 patients undergoing lumbar decompression and measured pre- and post-operative VAS as a primary outcome measure to evaluate surgical success. We performed a linear regression analysis comparing change in VAS score, 1 year VAS and percentage change in VAS with foraminal height and width and found no significant correlation (R² <0.2 for all correlations). We identified a sub-group of 16 patients with absent perineural foraminal fat signal with a significantly increased probability of post-operative VAS>2 compared to patients with present fat signal (p=0.0001) who all had foraminal height <10mm. In conclusion, we were unable to define dimensional foraminal parameters for clinically significant foraminal stenosis on para-sagittal MRI. Obliteration of perineural fat was associated with worse outcome and post-operative leg pain. The aetiology of foraminal stenosis is multi-factorial and more detailed imaging of the foramen is required. We recommend that coronal and fine para-sagittal MRI slices are analysed to evaluate patients with central and lateral recess stenosis for co-existing foraminal stenosis.

Purpose and background:

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare condition which, even in the presence of prompt surgical decompression, can have devastating consequences for patients in terms of bladder and bowel dysfunction. The aim of this project was to develop a post-operative pathway for the assessment and management of bladder and bowel dysfunction in patients with CES.

Purpose

To observe the safety and efficacy of a minimally destructive decompressive technique without fusion in patients with lumbar stenosis secondary to degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Introduction. Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) can be detected by sputum cultures. However, Extra Pulmonary Spinal Tuberculosis (EPSTB), diagnosis is challenging as it relies on retrieving a sample. It is usually discovered in the late stages of presentation due to its slow onset and vague early presentation. Difficulty in detecting Mycobacterium Tuberculosis bacteria from specimens is well documented and therefore often leads to culture negative results. Diagnostic imaging is helpful to initiate empirical therapy, but growing incidence of multidrug resistant TB adds further challenges. Methods. A retrospective analysis of cases from the Infectious Disease (ID) database with Extra Pulmonary Tuberculosis (EPTB) between 1. st. of January 2015 to 31. st. of January. Two groups were compared 1) Culture Negative TB (CNTB) and 2) Culture Positive TB (CPTB). Audit number was. Results. 31 cases were identified with EPSTB. 68% (n=21) were male. 55% (n=17) patients were Asian, (19% (n=6) were black and 16% (n=5) were of white ethnicity. 90.4% (n=28) patients presented with isolated spinal TB symptoms. No patient had evidence of HBV/HCV/HIV infections. CPTB Group was 51.6% (n=16) compared to CNTB Group with 48.4% (n=15) 48% (15) lumbar involvement, 42% (13) thoracic and 10% (3) cervical. 38.7% (12) patients presented with late neurology, equally in both groups. 56% CPTB patients showed signs of vertebral involvement on plain radiograph compared to 13.3% in CNTB patients. 68.7% CPTB patients had pathological changes or paraspinal collections seen on CT scan compared to 53.3% of CNTB patients. 81% of CPTB showed positive MRI findings compared to 86% in CNTB. Both groups were treated with Anti-TB medications according to local guidelines. 83% patients were followed up till the end of the treatment course. 22.5% (n=7) patients had Ultrasound guided aspiration. 29% (n=9) patients underwent surgical intervention. 3 patients had Laminectomy for decompression. 6 patients underwent Spinal Decompression and Fixation due to extensive bone destruction. No mortality occurred. Conclusion. TB continues to be a growing problem in the developed world with high numbers of patients travelling from endemic regions. 75% of our cases were from Asian or Black ethnicity. The thoracolumbar region was most commonly effected (90%). Approximately 50% of cases of extrapulmonary spinal TB were culture negative. Neurological deficit occurred in 40% patients and 30% of patients required surgery. Standard anti-TB treatment was however effective in all cases with no significant drug resistant variants noted. MRI and CT imaging remain the superior diagnostic tests in the presence of high CN EPSTB

Purpose. Prospectively evaluate the timescale of leg pain resolution after lumbar discectomy and decompression, in the immediate post-operative period and identify possible risk factors for failure/delay in leg pain resolution. Materials and Methods. A prospective observational study of 100 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar discectomy or decompression. Patients recorded their leg and back pain in VAS and disability in ODI preoperatively. Patients rated their leg pain relief just prior to discharge after surgery. Telephone follow-up at 1-2 week and 3-4 week post-op was followed by clinic review at 6 and 12 weeks, to assess the timescale of leg pain resolution and improvement in function (ODI score). Results. Immediately before discharge from hospital 67% patients reported relief of leg pain. 33% reported no relief or were unsure. Of these, 26 (80%) reported pain relief subsequently. At 1-2 weeks, 81 patients reported pain relief. 14 reported persistent pain, but six of them (45%) improved subsequently. By six weeks 91% reported leg pain relief and only two of the unimproved nine patients subsequently experienced relief of leg pain. Failure to improve the leg pain was clearly associated with failure to improve disability by ODI score. But the ODI score did not improve in 11 patients reporting relief of leg pain. Decompression in older age and women had a relatively higher risk of poor result. Conclusion. After lumbar discectomy and decompression, leg pain relief is immediate in 67%, in 81% by one week and in 91% by six weeks. Improvement is unlikely after this period. Non-resolution of leg pain resulted in persistent/worsened disability, but 11% patients did not improve functionally despite experiencing leg pain relief. Decompression, older age and female sex were negative risk factors

Aims

The escalating demand for medical resources to address spinal diseases as society ages is an issue that requires careful evaluation. However, few studies have examined trends in spinal surgery, especially unscheduled hospitalizations or surgeries performed after hours, through large databases. Our study aimed to determine national trends in the number of spine surgeries in Japan. We also aimed to identify trends in after-hours surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations and their impact on complications and costs.