We investigated the capacity of patient warming devices to disrupt the ultra-clean airflow system. We compared the effects of two patient warming technologies, forced-air and conductive fabric, on operating theatre ventilation during simulated hip replacement and lumbar spinal procedures using a mannequin as a patient. Infection data were reviewed to determine whether joint infection rates were associated with the type of patient warming device that was used. Neutral-buoyancy detergent bubbles were released adjacent to the mannequin’s head and at floor level to assess the movement of non-sterile air into the clean airflow over the surgical site. During simulated hip replacement, bubble counts over the surgical site were greater for forced-air than for conductive fabric warming when the anaesthesia/surgery drape was laid down (p = 0.010) and at half-height (p < 0.001). For lumbar surgery, forced-air warming generated convection currents that mobilised floor air into the surgical site area. Conductive fabric warming had no such effect. A significant increase in deep joint infection, as demonstrated by an elevated infection odds ratio (3.8, p = 0.024), was identified during a period when forced-air warming was used compared to a period when conductive fabric warming was used. Air-free warming is, therefore, recommended over forced-air warming for orthopaedic procedures

Deep infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine if there was a relationship between surgeon volume and the incidence of revision for infection after primary TKA.

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020 for primary TKA for osteoarthritis that were revised for infection. Surgeon volume was defined by the number of primary TKA procedures performed by the surgeon in the year the primary TKA was performed and grouped as <25, 25-49, 50-74, 75-99, >100 primary TKA procedures per year. Kaplan Meir estimates for cumulative percent revision (CPR) and Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios were performed to compare rates of revision for infection by surgeon volume, with sub-analyses for patella and polyethylene use, age <65 years and male gender.

5295 of 602,919 primary TKA for osteoarthritis were revised for infection. High volume surgeons (>100 TKA/year) had a significantly lower rate of revision for infection with a CPR at 1 and 17 years of 0.4% (95% CI 0.3, 0.4) and 1.5% (95% CI 1.2, 2.0), respectively, compared with 0.6% (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 2.1% (95% CI 1.8, 2.3), respectively, for low volume surgeons (<25 TKR/year). Differences between the high-volume group and the remaining groups remained when sub-analysis for age, gender, ASA, BMI, patella resurfacing and the use of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE).

High volume surgeons have lower rates of revision for infection in primary TKA.

Background. Around 1% of patients who have hip replacement have deep prosthetic joint infection afterwards. Infection is treated with antibiotics and revision surgery. We aimed to characterise the impact of deep joint infection and its treatment, to identify treatment preferences, and to describe surgeons' treatment decisions. Methods. In a qualitative study in the UK we interviewed 19 patients who had infection after hip replacement and 12 orthopaedic surgeons specialising in infection. Face-to-face interviews with patients explored experience of infection, treatment and recovery. Interviews with surgeons explored treatment decisions. With consent, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and anonymised. Once imported into QSR NVivo software, data were analysed using constant comparison. Results. Patients with deep joint infection described mobility loss, pain, loss of valued activities, changes to home environments/moving into care, negative impact on personal relationships and financial strain. Physical and psychological trauma was associated with revision surgery and antibiotic treatment. Patients had strong preferences for treatment options, emphasising impact of surgery, side effects of antibiotics and duration of treatment as key considerations. Although eradication of infection was important, patients felt that reducing impact of treatment was high priority and identified a need for more support. Surgeons' treatment decisions focused on patient characteristics and nature of infection to prioritise eradication of infection. During patients' recovery surgeons' were concerned about possible return of infection and patients' mobility and function. Conclusion. Infection after joint replacement causes physical and psychological trauma. Balancing patients' preferences for reducing impact of treatment with surgeons' emphasis on eradication of infection should be an important consideration in care. There is also need to develop new interventions to support patients with infection. Level of evidence. Level 3 – Qualitative Research. Funding statement. This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant number: RP-PG-1210-12005). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Ethics. This study has been given a favourable opinion for conduct in the NHS by the National Research Ethics Service Committee South West – Exeter 14/SW/0072

Introduction and Objective. Evidence in literature is contradicting regarding outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) and whether they are inferior to TKA in primary osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this review was to find out if any difference exists in the results of TKA between the two indications. Materials and Methods. The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Collaboration, and PubMed were searched and screened in duplicate for relevant studies. The selected studies were further subjected to quality assessment using the modified Coleman method. The primary outcome measure was patient reported outcome, and secondary outcome measures were infection, revision, stiffness, and patella tendon rupture. Results. A total of 18 studies involved 1129 patients with a mean age of 60.6 years (range 45.7–69) and follow up of 6.3 years. The time interval from index injury to TKA was 9.1 years. Knee Society Score (KSS) in PTOA reported in 12/18 studies showed functional improvement from 42.5 to 70 post-TKA exceeding minimally clinically important difference. In TKA for primary OA vs PTOA, deep peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was reported in 1.9% vs 5.4% of patients, whilst revision of prosthesis at an average of 6 years post-operatively was performed in 2.6 vs 9.7% of patients. Conclusions. TKA is a successful treatment option for PTOA. However, the risk of significant complications like PJI and implant failure requiring revision is higher than primary OA cases. Patients should be counselled about those risks. Further well-designed comparative cohort-matched studies are needed to compare outcomes between the two populations

Aims. Improvements in functional results and long-term survival are variable following conversion of hip fusion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and complications are high. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical and functional results in patients who underwent conversion of hip fusion to THA using a consistent technique and uncemented implants. Methods. A total of 39 hip fusion conversions to THA were undertaken in 38 patients by a single surgeon employing a consistent surgical technique and uncemented implants. Parameters assessed included Harris Hip Score (HHS) for function, range of motion (ROM), leg length discrepancy (LLD), satisfaction, and use of walking aid. Radiographs were reviewed for loosening, subsidence, and heterotopic ossification (HO). Postoperative complications and implant survival were assessed. Results. At mean 12.2 years (2 to 24) follow-up, HHS improved from mean 34.2 (20.8 to 60.5) to 75 (53.6 to 94.0; p < 0.001). Mean postoperative ROM was flexion 77° (50° to 95°), abduction 30° (10° to 40°), adduction 20° (5° to 25°), internal rotation 18° (2° to 30°), and external rotation 17° (5° to 30°). LLD improved from mean -3.36 cm (0 to 8) to postoperative mean -1.14 cm (0 to 4; p < 0.001). Postoperatively, 26 patients (68.4%) required the use of a walking aid. Complications included one (2.5%) dislocation, two (5.1%) partial sciatic nerve injuries, one (2.5%) deep periprosthetic joint infection, two instances of (5.1%) acetabular component aseptic loosening, two (5.1%) periprosthetic fractures, and ten instances of HO (40%), of which three (7.7%) were functionally limiting and required excision. Kaplan-Meier Survival was 97.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.4% to 100%) at ten years and 88.2% (95% CI 70.96 to 100) at 15 years with implant revision for aseptic loosening as endpoint and 81.7% (95% CI 70.9% to 98.0%) at ten years and 74.2% (95% CI 55.6 to 92.8) at 15 years follow-up with implant revision for all cause failure as endpoint. Conclusion. The use of an optimal and consistent surgical technique and cementless implants can result in significant functional improvement, low complication rates, long-term implant survival, and high patient satisfaction following conversion of hip fusion to THA. The possibility of requiring a walking aid should be discussed with the patient before surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):129–134

The purpose of this paper is to review the early results of Prostalac system under licence from Therapeutic Goods Administration for Professor Howie in the management of two stage exchange hip arthroplasty for infection (restricted to Royal Adelaide Hospital) and the addition of vancomycin and teicoplanin powder to tobramycin cement without additional tobramycin. Thirteen patients were treated for an infected THR with the Prostalac system. Preoperative and intra-operative cultures were taken to identify the infective organisms. Vancomycin 3 gm was added to the Prostalac cement mantle per 40 gm packet of antibiotic bone cement containing tobramycin 1 gm. Teicoplanin 2.4 gm was used in one case where the patient had a known vancomycin allergy. Postoperatively patients underwent six weeks of IV antibiotics followed by four to six weeks of oral. A short term successful clinical outcome was determined by implantation of a total hip prosthesis at the time of second stage operation and no reoperations resulting from recurrent infection and off antibiotics for â□¥ 6 months with normal clinical and CRP lab values. Thirteen patients received the Prostalac system. No patient was lost to follow-up. Nine have progressed to second stage revision, eight of which had femoral impaction grafting. Two deaths occurred not attributed to the Prostalac system. Three superficial wound infections and two required washout and debridement. One Prostalac stem subsidence. There has been no recurrence of deep joint infection. Retention of the second stage prosthesis has been 100% at 17 months. The PROSTALAC system with the addition of vancomycin or teicoplanin to the tobramycin antibiotic cement has encouraging short-term results for treatment of deep joint infection. Complication rate has been well within the range reported in literature. Successful early outcomes are encouraging with all patients in the Prostalac study having retained their permanent hip prosthesis following second stage surgery

Aims

Wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for diagnosis and treatment of wrist injuries. Even though not generally recommended for similar procedures, general administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is still widely used in wrist arthroscopy.

Intra-articular injections of steroid into the hip are used for a variety of reasons in current orthopaedic practice. Recently their safety prior to ipsilateral total hip replacement has been called into question owing to concerns about deep joint infection. We undertook a retrospective analysis of all patients who had undergone local anaesthetic and steroid injections followed by ipsilateral total hip replacement over a five-year period. Members of the surgical team, using a lateral approach to the hip, performed all the injections in the operating theatre using a strict aseptic technique. The mean time between injection and total hip replacement was 18 months (4 to 50). The mean follow-up after hip replacement was 25.8 months (9 to 78), during which time no case of deep joint sepsis was found. In our series, ipsilateral local anaesthetic and steroid injections have not conferred an increased risk of infection in total hip replacement. We believe that the practice of intra-articular local anaesthetic and steroid injections to the hip followed by total hip replacement is safer than previously reported

Deep joint infection is one of the most dreaded complications of total joint arthroplasty, and urinary tract infections (UTI) are generally believed to be a source for haematogenous seeding of the prosthetic joint. Although patients are often screened for UTI there appears to be minimal evidence on the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria, or for those patients who perform intermittent self-catheterisation prior to joint arthroplasty. This study aims to address this. We performed an online and postal survey of the British Association for the Surgery of the Knee membership to provide a consensus from a body of professionals. Of the respondents 75% performed 50 or more joint arthroplasty surgery over a 12 month period. For all surgeons, 71.4% provided antibiotic cover for the insertion and withdrawal of urinary catheters. However, only 19% were aware of National guidelines, compared to 76.2% for local guidelines which were more likely to be followed. Two thirds of surgeons would treat asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to surgery, yet 70% of these surgeons were unable to cite evidence for this decision. Similarly, the management of patients requiring intermittent self-catherisation produced a heterogenous response. Our study suggests there is a lack of consensus and/or awareness amongst specialist knee surgeons for the management of asymptomatic urinary bacteriuria in patients prior to knee surgery. We believe a minimum standard of care be defined by the society to protect both patient and surgeon

Urinary catheterization in the postoperative period is known to increase the risk of deep joint infection following arthroplasty. A number of studies have attempted to elucidate the individual patient factors and surgical procedural factors which predispose patients to postoperative urinary retention. We conducted a retrospective observational study of three hundred patients to specifically determine the effect of the anaesthetic technique on the incidence of urinary retention following elective lower limb arthroplasty. One hundred consecutive patients were surveyed in each of three groups differing by the type of the anaesthetic technique and the drug administered; 1) general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block, 2) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl, and 3) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine. The incidence of urinary retention requiring catheterisation in male patients receiving intrathecal morphine was 58% compared with 10% and 6% for those who had general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block and intrathecal fentanyl, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). The incidence of urinary retention in females across all groups was =2%. The average residual volume of urine following catheterisation was 750ml (460-1500ml). Our findings show that the use of intrathecal morphine greatly increases the risk of postoperative urinary retention in male patients, whereas no significant increase was found amongst female patients. This risk should be carefully considered when choosing the type of intraoperative anaesthetic/analgesic combination employed in male patients and be rationalised against the intended benefits to the patient

Aims

The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up.

Bleeding related wound complications including deep infection, superficial infection and haematoma cause significant morbidity in lower limb joint arthroplasty surgery. It has been observed anecdotally that patients requiring therapeutic anti-coagulation within the peri-operative period have higher rates of bleeding related complications and those requiring intravenous heparin particularly appear to do poorly. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between post-operative bleeding and wound complications in the patient requiring therapeutic warfarin, plus or minus heparin, in total hip arthroplasty surgery. This is a retrospective cohort study reviewing 1047 primary total hip replacements performed in a single centre over a five year period and comparing outcomes of the patients on warfarin (89) with a double-matched control group of patients not on warfarin (179). Outcomes included rates of deep infection, excessive wound ooze or haematoma, superficial infection, return to OT for washout and need for revision operation. The study group was then sub analysed comparing those on IV heparin plus oral warfarin, to those on warfarin alone. The warfarin group had significantly higher risk of deep joint infection (9% vs 2.2% p= 0.023), haematoma/wound ooze (28% vs 4% p < 0.001) and superficial infection (13.5% vs 2.2% p < 0.001) compared to the control group. In the sub analysis of the study group, those on IV heparin had significantly higher risk of haematoma/wound ooze (44% vs 28% p= 0.023) than those on warfarin alone. The requirement of therapeutic anti-coagulation in the peri-operative period is a tenuous balance between the complications of thrombo-embolic disease and bleeding-related morbidity. In the past, perhaps the full burden of bleeding related complications has not been appreciated, but now improved understanding will enable the both the surgeon and the patient to make more informed decisions regarding therapeutic anticoagulation in elective arthroplasty surgery

Aim. To compare the results of total knee replacement in a consecutive series of morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m. 2. ) with a matched group of non-obese (BMI< 30 kg/m. 2. ) patients. Methods. 41 consecutive total knee replacements performed in morbidly obese patients were matched pre-operatively with 41 total knee replacements performed in non-obese patients for age, sex, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, laterality, knee score and function score components of the Knee Society Score (KSS). All patients were prospectively followed up and the post-operative KSS, radiographs, complications (superficial wound infection, deep joint infection, deep venous thrombosis, peri-operative mortality) and five-year survivorship compared for the two groups. No patients were lost to follow-up (mean follow-up in morbidly obese: 38.5 (range 6-66) months; non-obese: 44 (range 6-67) months). Results. The mean knee score was inferior in the morbidly obese group compared to the non-obese group, but the difference only approached significance (p=0.08). The mean function score was significantly inferior in the morbidly obese group compared to the non-obese group (p=0.01). Total knee replacements performed in morbidly obese patients were associated with a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines on post-operative radiographs (29% vs. 7%, p=0.02) and a significantly higher complication rate (32% vs. 0%, p=0.001). The five-year survivorship based on revision and pain as endpoints was 72.3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 52.1%-92.5%) for the morbidly obese group compared to 97.6% (95% CI 92.9%-100%) for the non-obese group (log-rank test, p = 0.02). Conclusion. In a subgroup of obese patients who are morbidly obese, the results of total knee replacement are poor. These patients should be advised to lose weight prior to surgery or be warned of the inferior results before proceeding with surgery

We reviewed the outcome of 116 primary cemented Omnifit 7000 series total knee arthroplasties implanted into 108 patients over a period of two years with a mean follow up of 68 months (range, 48–90). During the review period, 12 patients died and 8 patients were lost to follow up (24 knees). The mean Knee Society score postoperatively at review was 86 (range, 65 to 95). The mean functional score at review was 76 (range, 60 to 100). The mean range of motion at review was 100 degrees (range, 85 to 115). Radioluscent lines greater than or equal to 1mm in width were present in 9 (10%) of the femoral views, 12 (14%) of the tibial AP views, 4 (4%) of the tibial lateral views and there was no evidence of progression of the radioluscent lines. There were three revisions; one because of an early deep joint infection, on due to instability in the AP plane and one due to aseptic loosening. The clinical and radiographic results with a minimum five year follow up show very satisfactory results. The Omnifit 7000 series provides results, which compare well with other cemented arthroplasties in the medium term

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of using dilute betadine versus sterile saline lavage in aseptic revision total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty to prevent acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Of the 450 patients that were randomized, 5 did not have 90-day follow-up, 9 did not receive the correct treatment, and 4 were excluded for intraoperative findings consistent with PJI. 221 Patients (144 knees and 77 hips) received saline lavage only and 211 (136 knees and 75 hips) received a three-minute dilute betadine lavage (0.35%) prior to wound closure. Patients were observed for the incidence of acute postoperative deep PJI within 90 days of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Power analysis determined that 285 patients per group are needed to detect a reduction in the rate of PJI from 5% to 1% (alpha=0.05, beta=0.20). There were seven PJIs in the saline group and one in the betadine lavage group (3.2% vs. 0.5%, p=0.068). There were no significant differences in any baseline demographics between groups suggesting appropriate randomization. Although we believe the observed difference between treatments is clinically relevant, it was not statistically significant with the sample size enrolled thus far and enrollment is ongoing. Nonetheless, we believe that these data suggests that dilute betadine lavage is a simple method to reduce the rate of acute postoperative PJI in patients undergoing aseptic revision procedures

Deep peri-prosthetic infection after partial or total knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute peri-prosthetic infection, most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. With carefully selected patients and very aggressive debridement protocols some success has been demonstrated in Europe with single-stage exchange for infection. Most surgeons in North America, however, are unfamiliar with the very aggressive debridement techniques employed at European centers that promote single stage replant; and few surgeons in North America are currently comfortable in cementing a hinged total knee replacement in place for the typical infected TKA nor do they have the patience to re-prep and drape with an entirely new OR setup after debridement and prior to the insertion of the new implant − 2 steps that are often mentioned as important to the success of single stage exchange. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2017

Aims

Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited.

Deep periprosthetic infection after hip or knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute periprosthetic infection most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2015

Introduction. The current recommendation by the AAOS in the 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the use of MRI to diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is “inconclusive” given the lack of evidence to support its use. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of MRI with metal reduction artifact sequencing in diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. 176 patients who underwent MRI with multi-acquisition variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) to reduce metal artifact for a painful THA between the years of 2009–2013 were retrospectively evaluated. All MRIs were read by one of four radiologists with extensive experience in interpreting MRIs after THA. All MRIs were performed using a 1.5 Tesla magnet. Of the 176 patients examined, 16 patients were found to have a deep periprosthetic joint infection using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria after the MRI was performed. MRI reads were classified as either positive (read as “evidence of active infection” or “suspicious for infection”) or negative (read as no evidence of infection). Only one patient who had a positive MRI read was excluded because of loss to followup after the MRI was performed. Results. Of the 160 aseptic patients, only one patient was read as suspicious for infection (false positive rate = 0.6%, specificity=99.4%, negative predictive value (NPV)=98.8%). Of the 16 patients with an infected THA, 14 patients were read as positive for infection (false negative rate=12.5%, sensitivity = 87.5%, positive predictive value (PPV)=93%). Conclusion. MRI with metal reduction artifact sequence is a highly specific test to diagnose or rule out a PJI with a low false positive rate and excellent PPV and NPV however, given its lower sensitivity than published for the serum C-reactive protein, is not recommended as a general “screening” test for all patients with pain after THA to rule out infection

Aim. This study aimed to identify risk factors for development of deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients following surgical treatment of neck of femur fracture. Method. This study identified a consecutive series of 2,822 (2,052 female, 73%) patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (n=1,825, 65%) or fixation (DHS) (n=997, 35%) for fractured neck of femur performed between January 2009 and June 2015 at our institution. Full patient demographics, co-morbidity and peri-operative complication data were determined. The majority of patients were either ASA 2 (n=663, 23%) or ASA 3 (n=1,521, 54%), mean age = 81.3 years (SD 10.3). All patients were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring team in order to identify patients who developed a PJI within 1 year. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient and surgical factors associated with increased risk of infection. Predictors with a p-value of <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Results. Thirty-nine (39) cases of deep periprosthetic infection were identified (hemiarthroplasty n=35, DHS n=4) representing an overall deep infection rate of 1.4% (hemiarthroplasty 1.9%, DHS 0.4%). The most common infecting pathogen was a pure growth of coagulase negative Staphylococcus (n=9, 23%) followed by a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 18%). An increased risk of PJI was observed in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty compared to those treated by fixation (odds ratio (OR) 6.50, 95%CI 2.26 – 18.7, p=0.001). Of patient factors, only blood transfusion within 30 days (OR 3.51, 95%CI 1.72 – 7.13, p=0.001) and the presence or development of pressure sores on or during admission (OR 2.99, 95%CI 1.24 – 7.19, p=0.015) were significantly associated with an increased risk of development of PJI. Use of high-dose dual antibiotic cement (gentamicin and clindamycin) was associated with a two-fold reduction in the risk of PJI (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.20 – 0.76, p=0.005) vs standard dose gentamicin antibiotic cement. Conclusions. This study found: 1) a deep infection rate similar to that reported earlier from large number studies from the UK, 2) a six-fold higher deep infection rate in hemiarthroplasties, compared to internal fixations, and 3) a three-fold higher infection rate in patients who suffer concomitant pressure sores or receive a blood transfusion up to 30 days post-operatively