Introduction. Despite decades of clinical research in artificial joints and underlying failure mechanisms, systematical and reproducible identification of reasons for complications in total knee replacements (TKR) remains difficult. Due to the complex dynamic interaction of implant system and biological situs, malfunction eventually leading to failure is multifactorial and remains not fully understood. The aim of present study was to evaluate different TKR designs and positions with regard to joint kinematics and stability under dynamic conditions by using a robot-based hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) setup. Material & methods. An industrial 6-axis robot with 6-axis force-torque sensor mounted into its end-effector moved and loaded real, commercially available TKR (bicondylar, cruciate-retaining) that were in virtual interaction with a subject-specific computational multibody model representing the anatomical situs of the knee joint while performing passive seated deep knee flexion. The subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody model (MMB) included rigid bones of the lower right extremity. Bone and cartilage geometries were reconstructed from MRT/ CT data sets preserving anatomical landmarks and allowing for the calculation of inertial properties. M. quadriceps femoris was modeled as single passive tensile force elements. Knee ligaments were modelled as elastic spring elements with a nonlinear force-displacement characteristic. Providing the flexion angle, the robot moved and loaded the mounted femoral implant component with respect to the tibial component while being in continuous interaction with the MMB. Several influencing parameters like implant position (internal/external rotation, varus/valgus alignment) and design (fixed vs. mobile bearing, tibia-insert height) as well as ligament insufficiency and joint loading on joint kinematics and stability was systematically analysed. Results. Improper implant positioning caused joint instability, which was demonstrated in higher magnitudes of the relative kinematics. Negative effects by incorrect implant positioning could be partially compensated by a mobile bearing design. However, this was accompanied with an increase in tibiofemoral contact forces. High correlation of tibia-insert height on ligament and contact force was found. After releasing ligament structures, lower tibiofemoral contact forces and joint opening during deep knee flexion were observed. Conclusion. By means of HiL simulation different clinical and technical parameters of TKR were evaluated in a systematical and reproducible fashion under physiological-like boundary conditions with regard to joint kinematics and stability. The proposed HiL test setup combining robot-based testing with MMBs can contribute to deeper understanding of knee joint function and improvement of total knee implant systems. Acknowledgement. The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant numbers: WO WO 452/8-1, BA 3347/3-1 and KL 2327/4-1) for supporting the project

Our aim was to investigate whether it is possible to predict post-operative kinematics (Post-Ope) from intra-operative kinematics (Intra-Ope) after total knee arthroplasty. Our study were performed for 11 patients (14 knees) who underwent primary PS TKA using CT-based navigation system between Sept.2012 and Sept.2014. The mean subject age was 71.5 ± 5.5 years at the time of surgery. Intra-Ope was measured using the navigation system after implantation during passive full extension and flexion imposed by the surgeon. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient was asked to perform sequential deep knee flexion under both non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) conditions from full extension to maximum flexion. To estimate the spatial position and orientation, we used a 2- to 3- dimensional (2D3D) registration technique. Intra-Ope and Post-Ope had a common coordinate axis for bones. Evaluations were range of motion (ROM), external rotation angles (ER). The level of statistical significant difference was set at 0.05. Mean ROM in Intra-Ope(130°± 7.9°) was statistically larger than both NWB(121.1°±10.5°) and WB(124.0°±14.7°). No Statistically significant difference was found in the mean ER from 10° to 120° among Intra-Ope (11.2°± 8.5°) and NWB(7.1°±6.0°) and WB(5.3°±3.2°). It is suggested that we could predict Post-Ope from Intra-Ope by considering the increase of the range of motion due to the muscle relaxation condition and the amount of change in the ER

We hypothesized that using the navigation system, intra-operative knee kinematics after implantation measured may predict that post-operative kinematic in activities of daily living. Our aim was to compare intra-operative knee kinematics by a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system and post-operative by the 2- to 3-dimensional registration techniques (2D3D). This study were performed for 8 patients (10 knees, medial osteoarthritis) who underwent primary PS TKA using CT-based navigation system. The median follow-up period from operation date to fluoroscopic surveillance date was 13 months (range 5 – 37 months). Navigation and 2D3D had a common coordinate origin for components. Medial and lateral femoral condyle anterior-posterior translation (MFT and LFT) were respectively defined as the distance of the projection of the points (which was set on the top of the posterior femoral pegs) onto the axial plane of the tibial coordinate system. Intraoperative kinematics was measured using the navigation system after final implantation and closure of the retinaculum during passive full flexion and extension imposed by the surgeon. Under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane, each patient was asked to perform sequential deep knee flexion under both weight bearing (WB) and non-weight bearing (NWB) conditions from full extension to maximum flexion. Repeated two-way ANOVA (tasks × flexion angles) were used, and then post-hoc test (paired t-tests with Boferroni correction) were performed. The level of statistical significant difference was set at 0.05 on two-way ANOVAs and 0.05 / 3 on post-hoc paired t-tests. Mean range of motion between femoral and tibial components were Intra-operative (Intra): 28.0 ± 9.7, NWB conditions: 120.6 ± 11.1, WB conditions: 125.1 ± 12.9°, respectively. Mean ER (+) / IR (−) from 0° to 120° were Intra-operative (Intra): 9.3 ± 10.2°, NWB conditions: 8.1 ± 8.9, WB conditions: 5.2 ± 7.0, respectively. Mean MFT /LFT from 0° to 90° were Intra; 4.4 ±14.8/ 4.2± 8.5mm, NWB; 6.2 ± 6.9 / 9.2 ± 3.1 mm, WB; 9.2 ± 3.5 / 7.4 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. Mean MFT /LFT from 90° to 120° were Intra; −4.4 ± 2.5 / −5.7 ± 2.9 mm, NWB; −5.5 ± 1.8 / −8.2 ± 0.6 mm, WB; −4.0 ± 1.9 / −5.4 ± 2.3mm, respectively. Mean ADD/ABD from 0° to 120° were Intra;-4.2 ± 3.0, NWB; −0.2 ± 2.1, WB; −0.1 ± 0.8, respectively. Repeated two-way ANOVA showed a significant all interaction on kinematic variables (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference at post-hoc test was found in ER/ IR of all tasks and MFT /LFT of Intra vs NWB and Intra vs WB from 0° to 120° (p>0.05 / 3). The Conditions of these tasks were different from each others. Our study demonstrated that intra-operative kinematics could predict post-operative kinematics

Summary. The effect of the geometry of the tibial polyethylene insert was investigated in vivo loaded conditions. Introduction. The decision to choose CR (cruciate retaining) insert or CS (condylar stabilised) insert during TKA remains a controversial issue. Triathlon CS type has a condylar stabilised insert with an increased anterior lip that can be used in cases where the PCL is sacrificed but a PS insert is not used. The difference of the knee kinematics between CR and CS insert remains unclear. This study measured knee kinematics of deep knee flexion under load in two insert designs using 2D/3D registration technique. Patients and Methods. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 20 knees (18 patients) implanted with Triathlon CR components (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ), 10 knees in the CR insert with retaining PCL, and 10 knees in the CS insert with sacrificing PCL. All TKAs were judged clinically successful (Knee Society knee scores >90), with no ligamentous laxity or pain. Mean patient age at the time of operation was 72±12 years in CR and 69±9 years in CS. Mean period between operation and surveillance was 20±11 months in CR and 11±5 months in CS. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a wight-bearing deep knee bending motion. Femorotibial motion including tibial polyethylene insert was analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion, femoral axial rotation, and antero-posterior (AP) translation of the nearest points. Results. The average range of motion between femoral component and tibial component was 113.3±22.3° in CR and 107.4±13.1° in CS. The amount of femoral axial rotation from 0° to 110° flexion was 8.6±2.9° in CR insert, and 7.6±2.6° in CS insert, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the amount of femoral external rotation (p=0.71). In CR insert, the medial contact point moved 4.0±2.9mm anteriorly from 0° to 100° flexion. The lateral contact point moved 2.0±1.1mm anteriorly from 60° to 90° flexion. In CS insert, the medial contact point moved 6.4±2.1mm anteriorly from 20° to 100° flexion. The lateral contact point moved 1.9±1.7mm anteriorly from 50° to 110° flexion. There was significant differences were observed in the amount of medial anterior translation between the two insert (medial; p=0.04, lateral; p=0.94). Discussion and Conclusion. Triathlon CR and CS insert had a similar kinematics pattern. However, there was significant differences were observed in the amount of medial anterior translation between the two insert. These results indicated that the increased anterior lip could not control medial anterior sliding. The posterior part of the two insert were almost same, so the kinematics are similar

Achieving deep flexion after total knee replacement remains a challenge. In this study we compared the soft-tissue tension and tibiofemoral force in a mobile-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee replacement, using equal flexion and extension gaps, and with the gaps increased by 2 mm each. The tests were conducted during passive movement in five cadaver knees, and measurements of strain were made simultaneously in the collateral ligaments. The tibiofemoral force was measured using a customised mini-force plate in the tibial tray. Measurements of collateral ligament strain were not very sensitive to changes in the gap ratio, but tibiofemoral force measurements were. Tibiofemoral force was decreased by a mean of 40% (sd 10.7) after 90° of knee flexion when the flexion gap was increased by 2 mm. Increasing the extension gap by 2 mm affected the force only in full extension. Because increasing the range of flexion after total knee replacement beyond 110° is a widely-held goal, small increases in the flexion gap warrant further investigation.