Clinical pathways are optimal patient care processes that have been developed to improve the quality of care for patients. Anecdotal evidence has suggested that patients presenting to the healthcare system with rotator cuff tears experience less than ideal quality care plagued by lengthy wait times, challenges in coordinating care, and inefficient use of healthcare resources. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff tears are in need of quality improvement through evidence-informed decision making. The purpose of this study is to develop a clinical pathway for patients presenting to the healthcare system with rotator cuff tears. The following steps were taken in developing the clinical pathway: 1) a multidisciplinary expert panel was formed; 2) goals of the clinical pathway were identified by the panel; 3) the literature and current clinical practices for best practice were reviewed; 4) recommendations for treatment algorithms were developed using consensus methods. The panel consisted of fourteen experts representing the two largest cities in Alberta, Canada (Edmonton and Calgary). The team consisted of at least one member from the clinical domains of sport medicine, orthopaedic surgery, athletic therapy, and physiotherapy. The first goal of the clinical pathway was to standardise screening, diagnosis, and physical examination of the patient. The second goal was to provide recommendations for appropriate investigations. The final goal was to map steps in the patients' care pathway including sequencing and timing recommendations for treatment and interventions. Best practices were reviewed by the panel and using a modified Delphi method, clinical pathways for three types of rotator cuff tears (acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic) were developed. A clinical pathway that reflected best practices was developed from the literature and experts. The clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology will help to standardised patient care, improve patient flow, reduce unnecessary interventions, reduce healthcare utilisation and costs, and improve the quality of patient care

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite improvements in trauma-related morbidity and mortality in high-income countries over recent years, outcomes following MSK injuries in low and middle-income countries, such as South Africa (SA), have not. Despite governmental recognition that this is required, funding and research into this significant health burden are limited within SA. This study aims to identify research priorities within MSK trauma care using a consensus-based approach amongst MSK health care practitioners within SA. Members from the Orthopaedic Research Collaborative (ORCA), based in SA, collaborated using a two round modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on research priorities within orthopaedic trauma care. Members involved in the process were orthopaedic healthcare practitioners within SA. Participants from the ORCA network, working within SA, scored research priorities across two Delphi rounds from low to high priority. We have published the overall top 10 research priorities for this Delphi process. Questions were focused on two broad groups - clinical effectiveness in trauma care and general trauma public health care. Both groups were represented by the top two priorities, with the highest ranked question regarding the overall impact of trauma in SA and the second regarding the clinical treatment of open fractures. This study has defined research priorities within orthopaedic trauma in South Africa. Our vision is that by establishing consensus on these research priorities, policy and research funding will be directed into these areas. This should ultimately improve musculoskeletal trauma care across South Africa and its significant health and socioeconomic impacts

The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, 6 of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference

Aim. In Two-Stage Revision, utilizing temporary antibiotic spacers is widely accepted. These spacers are available prefabricated or can be individually moulded intraoperatively. In this study, we analysed the efficacy of prefabricated and individual spacers in infection eradication of periprosthetic joint infection in knee and hip arthroplasties. Method. All spacers implanted at a tertiary academic center during two-stage exchanges between June 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Among 249 patients, 167 cases (minimum follow-up ≥ 12 months) were included. Commercial spacers contained vancomycin and gentamycin, while individual spacers contained vancomycin alone. Subgroup analysis by manufacturers was conducted using non-parametric methods including Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival analysis utilized Kaplan-Meier curves, and categorical data were analyzed using the Chi² test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results. Of the 167 patients included, a prefabricated spacer was implanted in 105 cases (62.9%) and an individual spacer was implanted in 62 cases (37.1%). In 106 cases, infection healing according to the Delphi consensus was achieved with a mean follow-up of 37.8 months [12;99]. Infection persistence was seen in 31.4% of the preformed spacers and in 45.2% of the individual spacers, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.09). (Results are shown in the illustration). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative anemia (p = 0.02 OR 2.25 CI-95% 1.2-4.4 p = 0.01) and diagnosed paraneoplastic disease (p = 0.01 OR 3.0 CI-95% 1.4-6.7 p = 0.01) were found to be risk factors for failure. Conclusions. Two-stage Revisions are successfully suitable options for the treatment of PJI. In this study, infection eradication was independent of the type of spacer. Anemia and paraneoplastic diseases were found to be risk factors of failure

Aim. Acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (AHI) is a diagnosis on the rise. The management is challenging and the optimum treatment is not clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of AHI, and to study risk factors affecting treatment outcome. Methods. We retrospectively analysed 44 consecutive episodes with AHI in a total hip or knee arthroplasty beween 2013 and 2020 at a single center. AHI was defined as abrupt symptoms of infection ≥ 3 months after implantation in an otherwise well functioning arthroplasty. We used the Delphi criteria to define treatment failure with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Results. AIH was most often caused by Staphylococcus aureus (36%) and streptococcal species (32%), but a broad spectrum of microbes were identified. The majority of patients (25/44) were treated with debridement and retention of the implant (DAIR), with a success rate of 40%, significantly lower than in patients treated with removal of the implant (94%, p=0.001). Staph aureus infections (p=0.004), knee arthroplasties (p=0.03), and implant-age < 2 years (p=0.034) were associated with treatment failure. The 2-year mortality rate was 19%. Conclusions. The main findings in this study were that outcome following DAIR in AHIs is poor, that the majority of infections were caused by virulent microbes, and we found a high mortality rate. Removal of the implant should more often be considered

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. Methods. Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. Results. Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, six of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. Conclusion. The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:549–555

Aim. D-dimer is a widely available serum test that detects fibrinolytic activities that occur during infection. Prior studies have explored its utility for diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), but not explored its prognostic value for prediction of subsequent treatment failure. The purpose of this study was to: (1) assess the ability of serum D-dimer and other standard-of-care serum biomarkers to predict failure following reimplantation, and (2) establish a new cutoff value for serum D-dimer for prognostic use prior to reimplantation. Method. This prospective study enrolled 92 patients undergoing reimplantation between April 2015 and March 2019 who had previously undergone total hip/knee resection arthroplasty with placement of an antibiotic spacer for treatment of chronic PJI. Serum D-dimer level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured preoperatively for all patients. Failure following implantation was defined per the Delphi consensus criteria. Optimal cutoffs for D-dimer, ESR, and CRP were calculated based on ROC curves and compared in their association with failure following reimplantation criteria at minimum 1-year follow-up. Results. 15/92(16.3%) patients failed reimplantation surgery at mean follow up of 2.9 years (range 1.0–4.8). Optimal thresholds for D-Dimer, ESR and CRP were determined to be 1300ng/mL, 30mm/hr, and 1mg/L, respectively. The failure rate in patient with positive D-dimer was significantly higher at 32.0% (8/25) compared to those with negative D-dimer 10.6% (7/66); p=0.024. In comparison, 17.8% (8/45) of patients with ESR above threshold failed, compared to 13.89% (5/41) below (p=0.555) and 16.0% (4/25) of patients with CRP above threshold failed, compared to 16.1% (10/62) below (p=1.000). Conclusions. Patients with elevated D-Dimer appear to be at higher risk of failure after reimplantation surgery. This serum marker may be used to generate an additional data point in patients undergoing reimplantation surgery, especially in circumstances when optimal timing of reimplantation cannot be determined based on clinical circumstances

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is the most common orthopaedic disorder in newborns. Whilst the Pavlik harness is one of the most frequently used treatments for DDH, there is immense variability in treatment parameters reported in the literature and in clinical practice, leading to difficulties in standardising teaching and comparing outcomes. In the absence of definitive quantitative evidence for the optimal Pavlik harness management strategy in DDH, we addressed this problem by scientifically obtaining international expert-based consensus on the same. An initial list of items relevant to Pavlik harness treatment was derived by systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA criteria and reviewed by two expert clinicians in DDH management. Delphi methodology was used to guide serial rounds of surveying and feedback to content matter experts from the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI), a collaborative group of paediatric orthopaedic surgeons with expertise in the management of DDH. Rounds of surveying continued in the same manner until consensus was reached. Importance ratings were derived from each round of surveying by calculating median score responses on the 5-point Likert scale for each item. Items requiring clarification or those with a median score of below 4 (“agree”) were modified as needed prior to each subsequent round. Consensus was considered reached when 90% or more of the items had an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤ 1. This value indicates low sample deviation and is accepted as having achieved consensus. This was followed by a corroboration of face validity to derive the final set of management principles. The literature search and expert review identified an initial list of 66 items in 8 categories relevant to Pavlik harness management. Four rounds of structured surveying were required to reach consensus. Following a final round of face validity, a definitive list of 33 items in 8 categories met consensus by the experts. These items were tabulated and presented as “General Principles of Pavlik Harness Treatment for DDH” and “Pavlik Harness Treatment by Severity of Hip Dysplasia”. Furthermore, highly contentious items were identified as important future areas of study and will be discussed. We have developed a comprehensive set of principles derived by expert consensus to assist clinicians, and for use as a teaching resource, in the non-operative management of DDH using the Pavlik harness. We have gained consensus on both the general principles of Pavlik harness treatment as well as the detailed treatment of hip subtypes seen across the spectrum of pathology of DDH. Furthermore, this study has also served to generate a list of the most controversial areas in the non-operative management of DDH which should be considered high priority for future study to further refine and optimise the outcomes of children with developmental hip dysplasia

Background. Recent reports demonstrate that Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) facilitates pathogen identification in the context of culture-negative PJI; however the clinical relevance of the polymicrobial genomic signal often generated remains unknown. This study was conceived to explore: (1) the ability of NGS to identify pathogens in culture-negative PJI; and (2) determine whether organisms detected by NGS, as part of a prospective observational study, had any role in later failure of patients undergoing surgical treatment for PJI. Methods. In this prospective study samples were collected in 238 consecutive patients undergoing revision total hip and knee arthroplasties. Of these 83 patients (34.9%) had PJI, as determined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and of these 20 were culture-negative (CN-PJI). Synovial fluid, deep tissue and swabs were obtained at the time of surgery and sent for NGS and culture/MALDI-TOF. Patients undergoing reimplantation were excluded. Treatment failure was assessed using the previously described Delphi criteria. In cases of re-operation, organisms present were confirmed by culture and MALDI-TOF. Concordance of the infecting pathogen(s) at failure with the NGS analysis at the initial stage CN- PJI procedure was determined. Results. Twenty cases of culture-negative PJI were identified (Figure 1). CNPJI rate in our samples was 24%. NGS was positive in 18 cases. Two cases were both culture and NGS negative. Eight CN-PJIs (8/20; 40%) failed by re-operation with infection recurrence confirmed on culture. In 7 of these 8 cases (88%), the organism at failure was present on NGS at the time of the initial CN-PJI procedure. The remaining case failed with a new organism, via likely hematogenous seeding from an inter-current infection (Figure 2). NGS detected several organisms in CN-PJI cases (Figure 3). Discussion. CN-PJI is often associated with polymicrobial genomic organism profile. Furthermore, most of the failures by infection recurrence were due to an organism previously detected by NGS. Our findings suggest some cases of PJI may be polymicrobial and escape detection using conventional culture. Further multi-institutional work with larger numbers and longer clinical follow-up is required for validation

Aims

Chronic osteomyelitis (COM) of the lower limb in adults can be surgically managed by either limb reconstruction or amputation. This scoping review aims to map the outcomes used in studies surgically managing COM in order to aid future development of a core outcome set.

Aims

Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice.

The purpose of this study was to validate a dry model for the assessment of performance of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and labral repair (LR). We hypothesised that the combination of a checklist and a previously validated global rating scale (GRS) would be a valid and reliable means of assessing RCR and LR when performed by residents in a dry model. An arthroscopic RCR and LR was performed on a dry model by residents, fellows, and sports medicine staff. Any prior RCR and LR exposure was noted. Participants were given a detailed surgical manuscript and technique video before the study began. Evaluation of residents was performed by staff surgeons with task-specific checklists created using a modified Delphi procedure, and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). The hand movements and arthroscopic view of the procedures were recorded. Both videos were scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant. A total of 35 residents, six fellows and five staff surgeons performed both arthroscopic RCR and LR on a dry model model (48 total). The internal reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) of the test using the total ASSET score was high (>0.8)). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score and the total checklist score demonstrated a difference between participants based upon year of training (p<0.05). Post hoc analysis also demonstrated a significant difference in global ratings and checklist scores between junior residents (PGY1–3) and senior residents (PGY4&5), senior residents and fellows, and fellows and staff. A good correlation was seen between the total ASSET score and prior exposure to RCR and LR. The inter-rater reliability (ICC) between the examiner ratings and the blinded assessor ratings for the total ASSET score was good (0.8). The results of this study provide evidence that the performance of a RCR and LR in a dry model is a valid and reliable method of assessing a resident's ability to perform these procedures, prior to performance in the operating room

It is strongly recommended that tissue and synovial fluid culture samples be obtained during reimplantation performed as part of a two-stage exchange arthroplasty. The incidence of positive cultures during reimplantation and the influence of positive cultures on subsequent outcome are unknown. This aim of this study was to determine the incidence of positive cultures during reimplantation and to investigate the association between positive cultures at reimplantation and the subsequent outcome. A retrospective review was conducted on 267 patients that met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI that completed both stages of two-stage exchange arthroplasty (Table 1). Intraoperative culture results from tissue and/or synovial fluid were obtained. Cultures were positive in 33 cases (12.4%) undergoing reimplantation surgery (Figure 1). Treatment failure was assessed based on the Delphi consensus definition. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors of positive culture and risk factors for failure of two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Treatment failure was 45.5% for those with a positive intraoperative culture and 20.9% in those with negative cultures at the time of reimplantation. When controlling for organism virulence, comorbidities, and other confounding factors, treatment failure was higher (odds ratio [OR]: 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–4.5) and occurred at an earlier time point (hazard ratio: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3–4.5) in patients with a positive reimplantation culture. The treatment failure rate was not different between cases with two or more positive cultures (36.4%) and one positive culture (42.8%). Positive intraoperative cultures during reimplantation, regardless of the number of positive samples were independently associated with two times the risk of subsequent infection and earlier treatment failure. Surgeons should be aware that a positive culture at the time of reimplantation independently increases the risk of subsequent failure and needs to be taken seriously. Given the significance of these findings, future studies are needed to evaluate the optimal management of positive cultures during reimplantation surgery

Failure of a two-stage exchange arthroplasty for management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a major clinical challenge. There is a paucity of information regarding the outcome of further surgical intervention in these patients. Thus, we aim to report the clinical outcomes of subsequent surgical intervention following a failed prior two-stage exchange. Our institutional database was used to identify 60 patients (42 knees and 18 hips) with a failed prior two-stage exchange from infection, who underwent further surgical intervention between 1998 and 2012 and had a minimum of two years follow-up. A retrospective review was performed to extract relevant clinical information, such as mortality, microbiology, and subsequent surgeries. Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were used to define PJI, and treatment success was defined using the Delphi criteria as previously reported. Irrigation and debridement (I&D) was performed after a failed two-stage exchange in 61.7% (37/60) patients. The failure rate of I&D in this cohort was 51.3% (19/37). Two patients underwent amputation after I&D due to uncontrolled infection. A total of 40 patients underwent an intended a second two-stage exchange. Reimplantation occurred in only 65% of cases (26/40), and infection was controlled in 61.6% (16/26) of patients. An interim spacer exchange was required in 15% (6/40) of the cases. Of the 14 cases that did not undergo a second stage reimplantation, 5 required amputation, 6 had retained spacers, 1 underwent arthrodesis, and 2 patients died. Further surgical intervention after a failed prior two-stage exchange has poor outcomes. I&D has a high failure rate and many of the patients who are deemed candidates for a second two-stage exchange either do not undergo reimplantation for various reasons or fail after reimplantation. The management of PJI clearly remains imperfect, and there is a dire need for further innovations that may improve the care of these PJI patients

Introduction. Because of the low cost and easy access, surgical video has become a popular method of acquiring surgical skills outside operating rooms without disrupting normal surgical flow. However, currently existing video systems all use a single point of view (POV). Some complex orthopedic procedures, such as joint replacement, require a level of accuracy in several dimensions. So single and fixed POV video may not be enough to provide all the necessary information for educational and training purposes. The aim of our project was to develop a novel multiple POV video system and evaluate its efficacy as an aid for learning joint replacement procedure compared with traditional method. Materials and Methods. Based on the videos of a hip resurfacing procedure performed by an expert orthopedic surgeon captured by 8 cameras fixed all around the operating table, we developed a novel multiple POV video system which enables users to autonomously switch between optimal viewpoints (Figure 1). 30 student doctors (undergraduate years 3–5 and naive to hip resurfacing procedure) were recruited and randomly allocated to 2 groups: experiment group and control group, and were assigned to learn the procedure using multiple or single POV video systems respectively. Before learning they were first asked to complete a multiple choicetest designed using a modified Delphi technique with the advice and feedback sought from 4 experienced orthopedic surgeons to test the participants' baseline knowledge of hip resurfacing procedure. After video learning, they were asked to answer the test again to verify their gained information and comprehension of the procedure, followed by a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire to demonstrate their self-perception of confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience. The scores in the 2 tests and in the Likert-scale questionnaire were compared between 2 groups using Independent-Samples t-test (for normally distributed data) or Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data). Statistical significance was set as p<0.05. Results. There was no significant difference regarding the ages of the participants between the experiment group (22.27 ± 1.79 years) and the control group (23.00 ± 1.56 years) (p value=0.242). The 10 questions in the test were divided into 3 subcategories: 4 questions regarding spatial awareness, 4 regarding operation details and 2 regarding sequence comprehension. There was no significant difference between both cohorts in the baseline test scores (for overall scores or scores in any subcategory) before video-learning, thus ensuring homogeneity. Yet, there was a 31.6–75.4% significantly (p<0.033) higher test score after video learning in the experiment group compared with the control group (for overall, spatial awareness and operation details scores) (Figure 2). The mean Likert-scale questionnaire score in the experiment group was also 32% significantly greater than the control group (Figure 3). Conclusion. Trainees could gain better knowledge and comprehension of hip resurfacing procedure and show higher confidence and satisfaction after learning using the novel multiple POV video system compared with traditional single POV video. The novel system could serve as an effective tool for teaching hip resurfacing procedure before trainees proceed to the real operating room. For figures, please contact authors directly

The aim of this study was to review the role of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review confirms growing international awareness of the important role research networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial for successful delivery of RCTs.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:169–74.