Aims. To compare the cost-utility of standard dressing with incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) in adults with closed surgical wounds associated with major trauma to the lower limbs. Methods. A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted from the UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective based on data collected from the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHiST) multicentre randomized clinical trial. Health resource utilization was collected over a six-month post-randomization period using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-utility was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates while uncertainty was handled using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results. The incremental cost of standard dressing versus iNPWT over six months was £2,037 (95% confidence interval (CI) £349 to £3,724). There was an insignificant increment in QALYs gained in the iNPWT group (0.005, 95% CI -0.018 to 0.028). The probability of iNPWT being cost-effective at £20,000 per QALY was 1.9%. The results remained robust in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusion. The within-trial economic evaluation suggests that iNPWT is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to standard dressing in adults with closed surgical wounds to their lower limbs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1072–1081

Background. Open fracture wounds are well known to be associated with infection & prolonged healing. Activity in scientific research to improve wound healing has often provided variable results. This study was done to question the de facto nature of Normal Saline as best irrigant in management of such wounds and to find out a better irrigant, if so, that does exist with due consideration to the mechanism by which saline dressings act. Material and methods. 30 patients with Grade 3 open fracture wounds were assessed over a period of three months according to Ganga Hospital Injury severity Score and were divided equally in study and control groups after adequate matching. A standard dressing protocol consisting of debridement and external fixation within 6 hours, avoidance of any antiseptic or surfactant agent, high-volume low-pressure pulsatile lavage irrigation and saline soaked gamgee pad packings with concerned solutions changed twice daily was done in respective groups. Follow-up was done by colour of healing granulation tissue, pus culture and soft tissue biopsy at Day 1, 3,7,10 & 14. Results. 6 out of 15(40%) wounds in study group were observed to have reached pink healthy granulation with low exudate by Day 14 as compared to only 3 out of 15(20%) in control group. The time taken to traverse from each stage of healing granulation was also observed to be smaller with 3% NaCl as compared to 0.9% NaCl. Although once healthy granulation stage was reached, further dressing with 3% NaCl in study group was shown to have worsening of granulation in about 33% of cases with none such observed in control. Conclusion. 3% NaCl is a better irrigant than 0.9% NaCl for dressing of Open trauma wounds during initial stages of dressing. Their effectivity in maintaining advanced granulation is although questionable, probably owing to its desiccative action

The purpose of this modified Delphi study was to obtain consensus on wound closure (including best practices for each tissue layer of closure) and dressing management in total hip arthroplasty (THA), using an evidence-based approach. The Delphi panel included 20 orthopedic surgeons from Europe and North America. Eighteen statements were identified (14 specific to THA and 4 relating to both THA and total knee arthroplasty) using a targeted literature review. Consensus was developed on the statements with up to three rounds of anonymous voting per topic. Panelists ranked their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of 75% was required for consensus. In Round 1, 15 of 18 statements achieved consensus via a structured electronic questionnaire. In Round 2, the 3 statements that did not achieve consensus were revised during a virtual face to face meeting. An additional 2 statements were edited for clarity. In Round 3, the 5 revised statements achieved consensus via a structured electronic questionnaire. Wound closure related interventions that were recommended for use in THA included: 1) barbed sutures over non-barbed sutures (shorter closing times and overall cost savings); 2) subcuticular sutures over skin staples (lower risk of infections and higher patient preference); 3) mesh-adhesives over silver-impregnated dressings (lower rate of wound complications); 4) negative pressure wound therapy over other dressings (lower wound complications and reoperations and fewer dressing changes); 5) triclosan coated sutures (lower risk of surgical site infection). Using a modified Delphi approach, a panel of 20 orthopedic surgeons achieved consensus on 18 statements pertaining to multi-layer wound closure and dressing management in THA. This study forms the basis for identifying critical evidence gaps within wound management to help reduce variability in outcomes during THA

Introduction. Ankle replacement is a major surgery with significant soft tissue dissection and bleeding. The skin quality is often poor in these patients due to age, edema, venous congestion, arteriopathy or previous procedures and soft tissue injury. The chances of wound infection increase with delayed wound healing. Absorbent non-adherent dressing (ABD) and VAC dressing applied in theatre after ankle replacement were assessed in a cohort of 147 patients with wound complications, pain, satisfaction and length of stay as outcome measures. Patients and methods. 71 consecutive patients were treated with ABD post-operatively after ankle replacement. The practice was then changed to VAC dressings for 76 consecutive patients. 44 patients had additional procedures performed with ankle replacement (11 from ABD group and 33 from VAC group). Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients had daily pain score, wound status, hospital stay, satisfaction and range of movement recorded. Results. Patients with VAC had mean pain score of 3/10 post operatively compared with 6/10 with ABD. There was a significant difference between the length of stay between the groups (p=0.02). The average stay of stay was 9 days with ABD and 7 days with VAC dressing. One of the patients with VAC dressing had blisters and 1 patient developed a superficial wound infection. Of the ABD group, 3 patients developed blisters and 7 patients had wound complications after ABD. Range of movement was similar in both groups of patients. Patient's satisfaction with VAC dressing was 8/10. Conclusion. VAC is better than ABD as primary dressing after ankle replacement

Aims. It has been generally accepted that open fractures require early skeletal stabilization and soft-tissue reconstruction. Traditionally, a standard gauze dressing was applied to open wounds. There has been a recent shift in this paradigm towards negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with open tibial fractures receiving standard dressing versus NPWT. Methods. This multicentre randomized controlled trial was approved by the ethical review board of a public sector tertiary care institute. Wounds were graded using Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, and patients with GA-II to III-C were included in the study. To be eligible, the patient had to present within 72 hours of the injury. The primary outcome of the study was patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life assessment using 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12), wound infection rates at six weeks and nonunion rates at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis and independent-samples t-test were applied for secondary outcomes. Analyses of primary and secondary outcomes were performed using SPSS v. 22.0.1 and p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. Results. A total of 486 patients were randomized between January 2016 and December 2018. Overall 206 (49.04%) patients underwent NPWT, while 214 (50.95%) patients were allocated to the standard dressing group. There was no statistically significant difference in DRI at 12 months between NPWT and standard dressing groups (mean difference 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08 to 1.1; p = 0.581). Regarding SF-12 scores at 12 months follow-up, there was no significant difference at any point from injury until 12 months (mean difference 1.4; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.9; p = 0.781). The 30-day deep infection rate was slightly higher in the standard gauze dressing group. The non-union odds were also comparable (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.45; p = 0.685). Conclusion. Our study concludes that NPWT therapy does not confer benefit over standard dressing technique for open fractures. The DRI, SF-12 scores, wound infection, and nonunion rates were analogous in both study groups. We suggest surgeons continue to use cheaper and more readily available standard dressings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):912–917

Aims. The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores. Methods. In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were randomized to either NPWT or conventional sterile occlusive dressings. A total of 17 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (21 to 81), were successfully recruited and none were lost to follow-up. Wound reviews were undertaken to identify any surgical site infection (SSI) or adverse wound events within 30 days. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were recorded as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results. There were two out of seven patients in the control group (28.6%), and two out of ten patients in the intervention group (20%) who were diagnosed with a SSI (p > 0.999), while one additional adverse wound event was identified in the control group (p = 0.593). No significant differences in PROMs were identified between the groups at either 30 days (TESS, p = 0.987; MSTS, p = 0.951) or six-month (TESS, p = 0.400) follow-up. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with a SSI within 30 days of surgery, across all patients (p = 0.029). The mean preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) was also significantly higher among patients who developed a postoperative adverse wound event (p = 0.028), including a SSI (p = 0.008), across both groups. Conclusion. This is the first RCT comparing NPWT with conventional dressings following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Postoperative wound complications are common in this group of patients and we observed an overall SSI rate of 23.5%. We propose proceeding to a multicentre trial, which will help more clearly define the role of closed incision NPWT in STS surgery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1049–1056

Aims. This study sought to compare the rate of deep surgical site infection (SSI), as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition, after surgery for a fracture of the hip between patients treated with standard dressings and those treated with incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). Secondary objectives included determining the rate of recruitment and willingness to participate in the trial. Methods. The study was a two-arm multicentre randomized controlled feasibility trial that was embedded in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation cohort study. Any patient aged > 65 years having surgery for hip fracture at five recruitment centres in the UK was considered to be eligible. They were randomly allocated to have either a standard dressing or iNPWT after closure of the wound. The primary outcome measure was deep SSI at 30 and 90 days, diagnosed according to the CDC criteria. Secondary outcomes were: rate of recruitment; further surgery within 120 days; health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EuroQol five-level five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L); and related complications within 120 days as well as mobility and residential status at this time. Results. A total of 462 valid randomizations were carried out (232 and 230 in the standard dressing and iNPWT groups, respectively). In the standard dressing group, 14 of 218 patients (6.4%) developed deep SSI. In the iNPWT group, four of 214 patients (1.9%) developed deep SSI. This gives a total rate of SSI of 4.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7% to 6.5%). Patients and surgeons were willing to participate in the study with 462 patients being recruited from a possible 749 (62.3%). Conclusion. The rate of deep SSI 30 days after surgery for a fracture of the hip was 4%, which makes a study comparing the clinical effectiveness of standard dressings and iNPWT feasible. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):755–761

Objectives. Wound complications are reported in up to 10% hip and knee arthroplasties and there is a proven association between wound complications and deep prosthetic infections. In this randomised controlled trial (RCT) we explore the potential benefits of a portable, single use, incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressing (iNPWTd) on wound exudate, length of stay (LOS), wound complications, dressing changes and cost-effectiveness following total hip and knee arthroplasties. Methods. A total of 220 patients undergoing elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasties were recruited into in a non-blinded RCT. For the final analysis there were 102 patients in the study group and 107 in the control group. Results. An improvement was seen in the study (iNPWTd) group compared to control in all areas. Peak post-surgical wound exudate was significantly reduced (p = 0.007). Overall LOS reduction (0.9 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.2 to 2.5) was not significant (p = 0.07) but there was a significant reduction in patients with extreme values of LOS in the iNPWTd group (Moses test, p = 0.003). There was a significantly reduced number of dressing changes (mean difference 1.7, 95% CI 0.8 to 2.5, p = 0.002), and a trend to a significant four-fold reduction in reported post-operative surgical wound complications (8.4% control; 2.0% iNPWTd, p = 0.06). Conclusions. Based on the results of this RCT incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings have a beneficial role in patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty to achieve predictable length of stay, especially to eliminate excessive hospital stay, and minimise wound complications. Cite this article: S. L. Karlakki, A. K. Hamad, C. Whittall, N. M. Graham, R. D. Banerjee, J. H. Kuiper. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:328–337. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1

Background of study. Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is one of the commonest elective arthroplasty operations. Crepe dressings are used following TKR by most surgeons as it may provide comfort and hemostasis through external pressure however, may reduce early range of motion (ROM). Avoiding crepe dressings after TKR saves operating time, avoids bulky dressings (which may reduce ROM) and allows interventions such as cryotherapy in the early post-operative period. There are no published studies comparing the use of crepe dressing after TKR with an impermeable dressing alone. Materials and Methods. We did a retrospective study, analysing patients who had a TKR with the use of crepe dressings compared with patients who had an impermeable dressing alone. All patients had cruciate retaining PFC Implants through the medial para-patellar approach. We compared ROM (at initial physio contact and on discharge), rate of wound leakage, opioid requirements and duration of inpatient stay. Results. Data from 40 patients with similar demographics was analysed; 20 in each group. There was no significant difference in; the ROM at initial physiotherapy contact and at discharge (P< 0.01), rate of wound leakage, opioid use and pain score during inpatient stay. The duration of inpatient stay was shorter in patients in whom a crepe dressing was not used. Conclusion. Avoiding the use of Crepe dressings after TKR does not improve early ROM, pain scores, opioid use or wound leakage in the immediate post-operative period. The duration of inpatient stay was shorter without a crepe dressing. Therefore, both practices can be safely used in clinical practice

Pin site care in external fixation remains a major challenge. The ideal dressing regime still remains controversial as does the type of dressing. We present an audit following the use of a sponge compression dressing in comparison to previously used sterile gauze. All pins and wires were inserted using a standardised technique. Dressings were applied during surgery to prevent haematoma formation. The new sponge dressing was applied to the wire or half-pin sites and compressed to the skin by either pierced tubing over the wire or clips at the end of the procedure. Dressings were changed weekly unless the pin sites were discharging serous fluid or frankly infected, when they were changed as required. The pin sites were evaluated for evidence of infection or irritation using the good, bad or ugly grading system. Each evaluation was performed by two of the authors on two separate occasions to assess the inter- and intra-observer error. The results were compared to those previously reported using sterile gauze as the pin site dressing. 1035 pin sites were assessed. 985 pin sites were graded as “good” (95.2%), 49 “bad” (4.7%) and 1 “ugly”. The kappa values demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-observer correlation, 0.892 and 0.905 respectively. The previous study using gauze reported 600 pin sites with 514 graded “good” (85.7%), 80 “bad” (13.3%) and 6 “ugly” (1%). The use of compression sponge dressing appears to reduce the rate of pin site irritation and infection. Further anecdotal evidence by patients who have undergone surgical treatment using both techniques demonstrated a preference for the sponge dressings due to ease of dressing change and general comfort once applied. We therefore would recommend this type of dressing in the use of external fixation

Background: The worst fear of a joint replacement surgeon is infection. Many factors are known to contribute to the development of infection in a surgical set up. Post-operative wound soakage is one of them. Wet wounds lead to repeated dressings, exposing the wound for contamination, risk of infection and increased length of hospital stay. Therefore, any measure to avoid postoperative wound problems is desirable. We wish to report our experience of the use of occlusive, sterile sanitary napkin dressings in routine total hip and knee replacement wounds. Method: In a prospective randomized study, we compared the use of occlusive, sterile sanitary napkin dressings with standard ward gauze dressings in routine hip and knee replacement wounds. We studied 27 patients in two groups (standard dressings and sanitary napkin dressings) for the number of dressing changes required due to wound soakage. Our results showed that use of sanitary napkin dressings reduced the number of dressings, significantly, before staples removal (p= 0.0001). Discussion: Using hydrofibre dressings have been reported to be effective in reducing the number of dressings in patients with lower limb arthroplasty. However, these dressings are expensive and require special manufacturing techniques. The use of sterile, occlusive sanitary napkin dressing in our set up has facilitated us to manage the joint replacement wounds very effectively. This method is simple, inexpensive and reduces the number of man hours and, we believe, reduces the overall cost of the treatment. Conclusion: Convinced by the impressive performance of this dressing in joint replacement wounds, the authors recommend this method, highly, for routine primary and revision joint replacements

Purpose We describe a simple method of dressing pin sites, based on the principles developed in the Ilizarov Institute, that can be easily used in British operating theatres. Method There are a wide variety of protocols for pin site care but infection rates of up to 80% are reported. The Russian Ilizarov Institute claim low infection rates which may be influenced by their dressing technique. Pin sites are dressed with gauze sponges held against the skin with specifically manufactured rubber stoppers passed over the wires. These provide pressure at the pin site. Plastic syringes consist of a barrel and a plunger with a rubber bung. The rubber bung from a 5ml syringe plunger can be easily removed and slid over the end of a half-pin or both ends of a fine wire. This must be done before the frame is attached and we recommend applying the bungs each time a pin is inserted. At the end of the procedure a cut piece of gauze is applied around the pin site and held in place by the rubber bung, providing a secure non-bulky dressing. A dressing protocol developed by the senior author, based on “The Russian Protocol”, was audited and found to have made a significant impact on the incidence on pin track infection. The bungs can be slid back up the pin when the dressings are changed and left up if the pin site is to remain uncovered. Should the pin site begin to discharge the bung can again be used to hold the dressings securely. Conclusion We have found this to be a simple, quick, inexpensive and reliable method of pin site dressing that can be readily used in everyday practice, and, reduces the pin track infection incidence

In recent years there has been growing interest in enhanced recovery regimes in lower limb arthroplasty due to potential clinical benefits of early mobilisation along with cost-savings. Following adoption of this regime in a district general hospital, it was observed that traditional dressings were a potential barrier to its success with ongoing wound problems in patients otherwise fit for discharge. The aim of this audit was to assess current wound care practice, implement a potentially improved regime and re-evaluate practice. A prospective clinical audit was performed over a three month period involving 100 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty patients with traditional dressings were evaluated prior to change in practice to a modern dressing (Aquacel™ Surgical). Fifty patients were then evaluated with the new dressing to complete the audit cycle. Clinical outcome measures included wear time, number of changes, blister rate and length of stay. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann Whitney or Fisher's Exact test (statistical significance, p<0.05). Wear time for the traditional dressing (2 days) was significantly shorter than the modern dressing (7 days), p<0.001, and required more changes (0 vs. 3 days), p<0.001. 20% of patients developed blisters with the traditional dressing compared with 4% with the modern dressing (p=0.028). Length of stay was the same for the modern dressing (4 days) compared with the traditional dressing (4 days). However, in the modern group 75% of patients were discharged by day 4 whereas in the traditional group this took until day 6. This audit highlights the problems associated with traditional dressings with frequent early dressing changes, blistering and delayed discharge. These adverse outcomes can be minimised with a modern dressing specifically designed for the demands of lower limb arthroplasty. Units planning to implement enhanced recovery regimes should consider adopting this dressing to avoid compromising patient discharge

A prospective trial was performed, comparing the use of silver sulphadiazine occlusive dressings with Fucidin gauze compressive dressings in the treatment of injuries to the finger-tip in patients presenting at the casualty department. Sixty-four patients were seen, four of whom had severe injury with extensive loss of pulp. The time taken for the wound to heal, the incidence of infection, and the duration of absence from work were compared for both types of treatment. The results showed that silver sulphadiazine occlusive dressings were the most effective in the treatment of these injuries even when they were severe

Purpose: Wound dressing is the last phase of any surgical intervention. The purpose is to isolate the surgical wound to reduce the risk of airborne contamination. In certain situations such as skin trauma, burns, acute or chronic loss of skin cover, or open fractures, wound dressings can however have a deleterious effect (maceration, adherence). Prevention of secondary infection of surgical wounds and spread of infection from septic patients is an integral part of our routine practice. We have developed a specific system useful in certain situations to isolate a septic or “at-risk” limb. Material and methods: Our system is composed of a closed 100-cm polyvinyl chloride isolator measuring 40 cm in diameter. Two “absolute” filters allow internal ventilation with a variable flow filtered-air generator. Sterile products are introduced into the isolator via a shuttle chamber. With this system, the wound can be isolated without isolating the patient. We have used this system for more than 250 patients since 1986. A dedicated chart has been used to monitor results obtained with the system since 1993. Results: The isolator was used for 258 patients, 185 men (71%), with 271 limb wounds on 227 lower limbs (83%) (63% legs and ankles). Half of the patients had open fractures associated with loss of skin cover. The clinical course was satisfactory in 75% of the patients (complete healing or complementary skin graft). The system was psychologically unacceptable for seven patients. There was only one case of a new germ isolated from a wound. Conclusion: This dressing isolator requires a significant “logistic” investment but provides considerable bacteriological safety for difficult cases

A randomised controlled pre-clinical trial utilising an existing extremity war wound model compared the efficacy of saline soaked gauze to commercial dressings. The Flexor Carpi Ulnaris of anaesthetised New Zealand rabbits was exposed to high-energy trauma using computer-controlled jig and inoculated with 10. 6. Staphylococcus aureus 3 hours prior to application of dressing. After 7 days the animals were culled. Quantitative microbiological assessment of post-mortem specimens demonstrated statistically significantly reduced S aureus counts in groups treated with iodine or silver based dressings (2-way ANOVA p< 0.05). Clinical observations and haematology were performed during the study. Histopathological assessment of post-mortem muscle specimens included image analysis of digitally scanned haematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections and subjective semi-quantitative assessment of pathology severity using light microscopy to grade muscle injury and lymph node activation. Tissue samples were also examined using scanning electron microscopy to determine the presence of bacteria and biofilm formation within the injured muscle. Non-parametric data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis. There were no bacteraemias, significantly raised white cell counts, abscesses, purulent discharge or evidence of contralateral axillary lymph node activation. All injured muscle specimens showed evidence of haemorrhage, inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis. All ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes were activated. There were no significant differences in the amount of muscle loss, size of the activated lymph nodes or in subjective semi-quantitative scoring criteria for muscle injury or lymph node activation. There was no evidence of bacterial penetration or biofilm formation. This study demonstrated statistically significant reductions in Staphylococcus aureus counts associated with iodine and silver dressings, and no evidence that these dressings cause harm. This was a time-limited study which was primarily powered to detect reduction in bacterial counts; however, there was no significant variation in secondary outcome measures of local or systemic infection over 7 days

The benefits of the Lautenbach suction-instillation have been recognised as an adjunct to the eradication of bone and joint infection. With the wide acceptance of external suction dressings as a means of accelerating wound healing and evacuating exudates, there are advantages to a system which combines these benefits for deep cavities with the direct infusion of antibiotics to increase local tissue concentrations. This is particularly useful in the extensive tissue defects encountered with wide excision of musculoskeletal tumours and reconstruction with mega prostheses or bulk allograft (with many patients undergoing adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy), and also in complex orthopaedic trauma cases with tissue loss. These situations are associated with a reported infection incidence of up to 40%. Materials. The results of use of the Lautenbach suction-instillation system were studied prospectively in 100 patients over a 7 year period. Results. Sixty cases followed wide excision of musculoskeletal tumours and 40 were caused by complex trauma. Due to logistics, many tumour cases were managed post-operatively in a septic orthopaedic ward. Immediate soft tissue cover was achieved in all tumour cases, utilising flaps where necessary, but cover was delayed for up to 3 weeks in some trauma cases. One late infection (2 years post-op) in a bulk allograft reconstructed sarcoma patient and 1 trauma infection were noted. Both were successfully eradicated with a secondary debridement & Lautenbach suction-instillation. Conclusion. The results of the use of this system to minimise infection under these difficult clinical circumstances are encouraging

Aims. The aims of this study were to report the outcomes of patients with a complex fracture of the lower limb in the five years after they took part in the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHIST) trial. Methods. The WHIST trial compared negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings with standard dressings applied at the end of the first operation for patients undergoing internal fixation of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Complex fractures included periarticular fractures and open fractures when the wound could be closed primarily at the end of the first debridement. A total of 1,548 patients aged ≥ 16 years completed the initial follow-up, six months after injury. In this study we report the pre-planned analysis of outcome data up to five years. Patients reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) (0 to 100, in which 100 = total disability), and health-related quality of life, chronic pain scores and neuropathic pain scores annually, using a self-reported questionnaire. Complications, including further surgery related to the fracture, were also recorded. Results. A total of 1,015 of the original patients (66%) provided at least one set of outcome data during the five years of follow-up. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability between the two groups at five years (NPWT group mean DRI 30.0 (SD 26.5), standard dressing group mean DRI 31.5 (SD 28.8), adjusted difference -0.86 (95% CI -4.14 to 2.40; p = 0.609). There was also no evidence of a difference in the complication rates at this time. Conclusion. We found no evidence of a difference in disability ratings between NPWT compared with standard wound dressings in the five years following the surgical treatment of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Patients in both groups reported high levels of persistent disability and reduced quality of life, with little evidence of improvement during this time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(8):858–864

Introduction. External fixators are attached to bones with percutaneous pins and wires inserted through soft tissues and bone increasing the risk of infections. Such infections compromise patient outcomes e.g., through pin loosening or loss, failure of fixator to stabilise the fracture, additional surgery, increased pain, and delayed mobilisation. These infections also impact the healthcare system for example, increased OPD visits, hospitalisations, treatments, surgeries and costs. Nurses have a responsibility in the care and management of patients with external fixators and ultimately in the prevention of pin-site infection. Yet, evidence on best practices in the prevention of pin-site infection is limited and variation in pin-site management practices is evident. Various strategies are used for the prevention of pin-site infection including the use of different types of non-medicated and medicated wound dressings. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the use of dry gauze or iodine tulle dressings for the prevention of pin-site infections in patients with lower limb external fixators. Methodology. A retrospective study of patients with lower limb external fixators who attended the research site between 2015–2022. Setting & Sample: The setting was the outpatient's (OPD) orthopaedic clinic in a University Teaching Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Eligibility Criteria:. Over the age of 16, treated with an Ilizarov, Taylor Spatial frame (TSF) or Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) external fixators on lower limbs,. Pin-sites dressed with dry gauze or iodine tulle,. Those with pre-existing infected wounds close to the pin site and/or were on long term antibiotics were excluded. Follow Up Period: From time of external fixator application to first pin-site infection or removal of external fixator. Outcome Assessment: The primary outcome was pin-site infection, secondary outcomes included but were not limited to frequency of pin-site infection according to types of bone fixation, frequency of pin/wire removal and hospitalisation due to infection. Data analysis: IBM SPSS Version 25 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted as appropriate. Categorical data were analysed by counting the frequencies (number and percentages) of participants with an event as opposed to counting the number of episodes for each event. Differences between groups were analysed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Continuous variables were reported using mean and standard deviations and difference analysed using a two-sample independent t-test or non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney), where appropriate. Using Kaplan-Meier, survival analysis explored time to development of infection. Ethical approval: granted by local institute Research Ethics Committee on 12th March 2018. Results. During the study period, 97 lower limb external fixators were applied with 43 patients meeting the study eligibility criteria. The mean age was 38 (SD 14.1; median 37) and the majority male (n=32, 74%). At least 50% (n=25) of participants had an IIizarov fixator, with 56% (n=24) of all fixators applied to the tibia and fibula. Pin/wire sites were dressed using iodine (n=26, 61%) or dry gauze dressings (n=15, 35%). The mean age of participants in the iodine group was significantly higher than the dry gauze group (p=.012). The only significant difference between the iodine and dry gauze dressing groups at baseline was age. A total of 30 (70%) participants developed a pin-site infection with 26% (n=11) classified as grade 2 infection. Clinical presentation included redness (n=18, 42%), discharge (n=16, 37%) and pain (n=15, 35%). Over half of participants were prescribed oral antibiotics (n=28, 65%); one required intravenous antibiotics and hospitalization due to pin-site infection. Ten (23%) participants required removal of pin/wires; two due to pin-site infection. There was no association between baseline data and pin-site infection. The median time to developing an infection was 7 weeks (95%, CI 2.7 to 11.29). Overall, there were 21 (81%, n=26) pin-site infections in the iodine group and nine (60%, n=15) in the dry gauze group, difference in proportion and relative risk between the dressing groups were not statistically significant (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12; p= .272). There was no association between baseline data, pin-site infection, and type of dressing. Conclusions. At the research site, patients are referred to the OPD orthopaedic clinic from internal and external clinical sites e.g., from Hospital Consultants, General Practitioners and occasionally from multidisciplinary teams, throughout Ireland. Our retrospective observation study found that 97 lower limb external fixators were applied over a seven-year period which is lower than that reported in the literature. However, the study period included the COVID pandemic years (2020 and 2021) which saw a lower number of external fixators applied due to lack of theatre availability, cancelled admissions and social/travel restrictions that resulted in fewer accidents and lower limb trauma cases requiring external fixator application. The study highlighted a high infection rate with 70% of participants developing pin-site infection which is in keeping with findings reporting in other studies. Our study showed that neither an iodine nor dry gauze dressing was successful in preventing pin-site infection. In the iodine group 81% of participants developed infection compared to 60% in the dry gauze group. Given the lack of difference between the two groups consideration needs to be given to the continued use of iodine dressings in the prevention of pin-site infection. Pin-site infections result in a high portion of participants being prescribed antibiotics and, in an era, that stresses the importance of antimicrobial stewardship there is a need to implement effective infection prevention and control strategies that minimise infection. Further research is therefore needed to investigate more innovative medicated dressings such as those that contain anti-microbial or anti-bacterial agents

Aims. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of patients with severe open fractures of the lower limb in the five years after they took part in the Wound management for Open Lower Limb Fracture (WOLLF) trial. Methods. The WOLLF trial compared standard dressings to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) applied at the end of the first surgical wound debridement, and patients were followed-up for 12 months. At 12 months, 170 of the original 460 participants agreed to take part in this medium-term follow-up study. Patients reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) (0 to 100, where 100 is total disability) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) annually by self-reported questionnaire. Further surgical interventions related to the open fracture were also recorded. Results. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability, HRQoL, or the need for further surgery between patients treated with NPWT versus standard dressings at five years. Considering the combined results for all participants, there was a small but statistically significant change in DRI scores over time (1.6 units per year; p = 0.005), but no evidence that EQ-5D-3L scores changed significantly during years two to five (p = 0.551). Conclusion. This study shows that the high levels of disability and reduced HRQoL reported by patients 12 months after severe open fractures of the lower limb persist in the medium term, with little evidence of improvement between years two and five. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):633–639