Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XIV | Pages 31 - 31
1 Apr 2012
Mottard S Grimer R Carter S Tillman R Abudu S Jeys L Spooner D
Full Access

Aim. To identify factors leading to the success or failure of extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone (ECIR). Method. Review of experience of this technique since 1996 documenting successes and failures. Results. 35 patients with a variety of malignant bone tumours underwent ECIR from 1996 up to 2007. The most common diagnosis was Ewings' sarcoma (15) followed by osteosarcoma (9) and chondrosarcoma (5) with the most common sites being the pelvis (15) followed by the tibia (10) and humerus (3). The age range was from 7 to 66 and 8 were skeletally immature at the time of surgery. The bones were sterilised with a dose of 90Gy before reimplantation. The overall patient survival was 69% at 5 years and 62% at 10 years. Local recurrence arose in 4 cases, 3 of whom already had metastatic disease. None of the LR arose in the irradiated bone. The rate of non union was 9% at the 58 osteotomies, the greatest risk being in the tibia. There were four graft fractures of which 3 needed fixation and all united. There is one case of convincing graft resorbtion after 12 years. Two patients developed infections but there have been none since the bone was routinely immersed in antibiotics whilst being irradiated. Conclusion. ECIR is a useful technique with very limited indications. In the majority of cases it works well. It appears particularly useful in pelvic resections and diaphyseal resections. Distal tibial reconstructions do worst. The irradiated bone needs reinforcing with either cement or a bone graft for best results


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1156 - 1161
1 Nov 2002
Chen WM Chen TH Huang CK Chiang CC Lo WH

Autogenous bone graft which has been either autoclaved or irradiated is commonly used in oriental countries as an alternative to allograft. We started to use the technique of extracorporeal irradiation of the resected specimen and reimplantation (ECIR) in 1991. There was, however, a high incidence of fracture of the irradiated bone and loss of articular cartilage. In an attempt to reduce these complications, we combined the irradiated autograft with a conventional arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 1998, 14 patients underwent limb salvage by this method. Seven had an osteosarcoma, two bony metastases, three a chondrosarcoma, one a malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and one a leiomyosarcoma. Ten tumours were located in the proximal femur, two in the proximal humerus, and two in the distal femur. One patient who had a solitary metastasis in the proximal part of the left femur died from lung metastases 13 months after operation. The remaining 13 patients were alive and without evidence of local recurrence or distant metastases at a mean follow-up of 43 months (28 to 72). Postoperative palsy of the sciatic nerve occurred in one patient, but no complications such as wound infection, fracture, or nonunion were seen. All host-irradiated bone junctions healed uneventfully within eight months. Using the Enneking functional evaluation system, the mean postoperative score for all 14 patients was 80% (57 to 93). The use of irradiated autograft prosthesis composites reduces the complications of ECIR and gives good functional results. It may be a good alternative in limb-salvage surgery, especially in countries where it is difficult to obtain allografts