The study is been conducted to compare the outcome of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar fractures by long segment fixation and short segment fixation with a screw in fractured vertebra. Study includes the consecutive patients of dorsolumbar fractures treated by either long segment or short segment fixation. Twenty patients were included in each category. Patients with or without neurological deficit were included. Patients with single fractured vertebra only were included. Patients with single level dorsolumbar fracture were subjected to detailed radiological analysis preoperatively by measurement of height loss and kyphosis angle of fractured vertebra. Detailed neurological status was recorded. During the fixation the pedicle screw was inserted in less affected pedicle of fractured vertebra and decompression if needed was done by hemilaminectomy of other side. Bone graft. Postoperative kyphosis correction and restoration of height was calculated in both the groups. At 3 months, 12months and 24 months the maintenance of corrected kyphosis and restored height was recorded. Neurological examination to record the effect of surgical intervention on neurological recovery was recorded at every examination. All the patients had satisfactory outcome. The loss of correction in both the groups was comparable. The treatment allows easier postoperative nursing and early mobilization of the patient. Segmental fixation with screws at the level of the fracture offers improved biomechanical stability. It allows additional fixation points that may aid in fracture reduction and kyphosis correction. It also reduces the duration of surgery, blood loss as well as cost of implant without significant compromise on outcome. Pedicle screw at the level of fracture in short segment fixations provides added stability, better postoperative maintenance of corrected kyphosis at reduced cost of implant

Aims

Psychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS.

Spinal cord injury following trauma is initially dealt with by acute hospitals. The early management including stabilization is usually performed by these centres. This is followed by onward referral to one of the Regional Spinal Injury Units. There is concern of both sides of the fence regarding mobilization following spinal cord injury. The acute hospitals want to avoid the problems of prolonged recumbency and the Regional Spinal Injury Units wish to avoid the problems of early aggressive mobilization. Therefore, we set out to discover if there was a standard approach to mobilising these patients following surgical stabilization, because of the oversubscribed resources of the spinal injury units and the wish to start mobilizing the injured as soon as possible. A comparative audit of the Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and North American Units. Regional Spinal Injury Units in United Kingdom and North America. Clear Management Plan. Mobilisation Schedule. We had replies from all Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and from seven in North America. The Regional Spinal Injury Units all had differing approaches. Only a few were able to convey a clear management plan and mobilization schedule. Whereas the North American Units provided a ‘mobilize as able’ plan in all cases. The North American Units had a ‘mobilize as able’ policy, whereas the UK units had a mixed approach. A coherent collaboration between the spinal surgeons stabilizing these injuries and the spinal injury units providing rehabilitation would improve patient management

Aims

The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.