When performing limb salvage operations for malignant bone tumours in skeletally immature patients, it is desirable to reconstruct the limb with a prosthesis that can be lengthened without surgery at appropriate intervals to keep pace with growth of the contra-lateral side. We have developed a prosthesis that can be lengthened non-invasively. The lengthening is achieved on the principle of electromagnetic induction. The purpose of this study was to look at our early experience with the use of the Non Invasive Distal Femoral Expandable Endoprosthesis. A prospective study of 17 skeletally immature patients with osteosarcoma of the distal femur, implanted with the prosthesis, was performed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore. The patients were aged between 9 and 15 years (mean 12.1 years) at the time of surgery. Patients were lengthened at appropriate intervals in outpatient clinics. Patients were functionally evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Scoring System and the Toronto Extremity Severity Score (TESS). Average time from the implantation to the last follow-up was 18.2 months (range 14-30 months). The patients have been lengthened by an average of 25mm (4.25-55mm). The mean amount of knee flexion is 125 degrees. The mean MSTS score is 77% (23/30; range 11-29) and the mean TESS score is 72%. There have been two complications: one patient developed a flexion deformity of 25 degrees at the knee joint and one patient died of disseminated metastatic malignancy. The early results from patients treated using this device have been encouraging. Using this implant avoids multiple surgical procedures and general anaesthesia. This results in low morbidity, cost savings and reduced psychological trauma. We do need additional data regarding the long-term structural integrity of the prosthesis

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant.

A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed.

Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17–86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1).

These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed.

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant.

A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed.

Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17-86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1).

These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed.

Introduction and Objective

Curative resection of proximal humerus tumours is now possible in this era of limb salvage with endoprosthetic replacement considered as the preferred reconstructive option. However, it has also been linked with mechanical and non-mechanical failures such as stem fracture and aseptic loosening. One of the challenges is to ensure that implants will endure the mechanical strain under physiological loading conditions, especially crucial in long surviving patients. The objective is to investigate the effect of varying prosthesis length on the bone and implant stresses in a reconstructed humerus-prosthesis assembly after tumour resection using finite element (FE) modelling.

Debate surrounds the optimum operative treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) at the level of well fixed femoral components; lateral locking plate fixation (LLP-ORIF) or distal femoral replacement (DFR). To determine which attributed the least peri-operative morbidity and mortality we performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 consecutive unilateral PDFFs of Su types II (40/60) and III (20/60) in patients ≥60 years; 33 underwent LLP-ORIF and 27 underwent DFR. The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and functional mobility status. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox multivariable regression analysis identified risk factors for reoperation after LLP-ORIF.

Mean length of follow-up was 3.8 years (range 1.0–10.4). One-year mortality was 13% (8/60). Reoperation rate was significantly higher following LLP-ORIF: 7/33 vs 0/27, p=0.008. For the endpoint reoperation, five-year survival was better following DFR: 100% compared to 70.8% (51.8 to 89.8 95%CI) (p=0.006). For the endpoint mechanical failure (including radiographic loosening) there was no difference at 5 years: ORIF 74.5% (56.3 to 92.7); DFR 78.2% (52.3 to 100), p=0.182). Reoperation following LLP-ORIF was independently associated with medial comminution: HR 10.7 (1.45 to 79.5, p=0.020). Anatomic reduction was protective against reoperation: HR 0.11(0.013 to 0.96, p=0.046). When inadequately fixed fractures were excluded differences in survival were no longer significant: reoperation (p=0.156); mechanical failure (p=0.453).

Reoperation rates are higher following LLP-ORIF of low PDFFs compared to DFR. Where adequate reduction, proximal fixation and augmentation of medial comminution is used there is no difference in survival between LLP-ORIF and DFR.

Introduction

Computer Tomography (CT) imaging has been limited to beam hardening artefacts until now. Literature has failed to describe sensitivity and specifity for loosening of endoprothesis in CTs, as metal artefacts have always influenced the diagnostic value of CTs.

In recent years a new technology has been developed, the Dual Energy CT. Dual Energy CT scanners simultaneously scan with two tubes at different energy levels, most commonly 100kVp and 140kVp. Furthermore pictures gained from Dual Energy CTs are post-processed with monoenergetic reconstruction, which increases picture quality while further reducing metal artefacts.

This promising technology has increased the diagnostic value preventing more radiation for the patients, for example in detection of kidney stones or to map lung perfusion. In the musculoskeletal imaging it has not been established yet and further clinical investigations are necessary.

Thus the aim of this study is to describe sensitivity and sensibility for endoprothesis loosening of this novel technology.

Purpose: To study the results of treatment of symptomatic non-union with endoprosthesis at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

Methods: Between 1987 & 2005, 17patients were treated with massive endoprosthesis for non-union. We performed a retrospective review of these case notes

Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 63years (range 36–86). Location of non-union was distal femur in 9, proximal femur in 4, proximal humerus in 2, proximal tibia in 1, distal humerus in 1. The majority of the patients had received prior multiple operations before endoprosthetic surgery.

Four patients had obvious infection confirmed by histology and/or microbiology prior to surgery. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction was performed as a 1 stage procedure in 13 and as a 2 stage in 4.

Complications occurred in 5 patients. These included recurrence of infection in 1, persistent pain in 1, aseptic loosening in 1, periprosthetic fracture in 1 and a non ST myocardial infarction in 1. At the last follow-up, (mean 5years, range 1–18years) majority of patients achieved good range of motion and good mobility.

Conclusion: We conclude that endoprosthetic replacement is a reasonable option for treatment of end-stage non-union in carefully selected patients. Adequate mobility and function can be achieved in majority of patients following such treatment

Aims

The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs).

Aim

The risk of haematogenic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after dental procedures is discussed controversially. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated infections according to the origin of infection based on the natural habitat of the bacteria. We investigated the frequency of positive monomicrobial cultures involving bacteria from oral cavity in patients with suspected PJI compared to bone and joint infections without joint prosthesis.

Purpose: We report a series of 58 patients with metastatic bone disease treated with resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction over a 5 year period at our institution.

Introduction: The recent advances in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy in cancer treatment has resulted in improved prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Most patients who have an actual or impending pathological fracture should have operative stabilisation or reconstruction. According to BOA guidelines patients should undergo a single procedure which allows early full weight bearing and lasts the expected lifespan of the patient. The use of modern modular endoprostheses allows these criteria to be met.

Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified all patients diagnosed with metastatic disease to bone between 1999 to 2003. 171 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. Metastatic breast and renal cancer accounted for 47% of the lesions. 58 patients with bone metastasis to the appendicular skeleton had an endo-prosthetic reconstruction. There were 28 males and 30 females. 11 patients had lesions in the upper extremity and 47 patients had lesions in the lower extremity. Mean age at presentation was 62 years (24 to 88 years). 19 patients are still alive, 34 patients had died and 5 were lost to follow-up. Patients died of disease at a mean of 22 months (2 to 51 months) from surgery. Mean follow-up was 55 months (24 to 78 months). There were 5 wound infections, 1 aseptic loosening, 3 dislocations, 1 subluxation and 1 prosthesis rotated requiring open repositioning. Patients were followed up and evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Society Tumour Score (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. The mean MSTS score was 73% (57 to 90%) and TESS was 71% (84 to 95%).

Conclusions: We conclude that endoprosthetic replacement for the treatment of bone metastases in selected cases achieves the aims of restoring function, allowing early weight bearing and alleviating pain. The complication rate is low.

Sixty eight consecutive patients underwent proximal humeral replacement with a fixed fulcrum massive endoprosthesis, for tumour, between 1997 and 2007. The mean age was 46 years, (7–87). Ten patients were lost to follow up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The mean MSTS score was 72.3% and the mean TESS was 77.2%.

Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This sub group of 4 patients had a mean MSTS score of 77.7% and a mean TESS of 80.0%.

Endoprosthetic replacement for tumour of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good functional results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with the new constrained humeral liner.

Sixty eight consecutive patients underwent proximal humeral replacement with a fixed fulcrum massive endoprosthesis for tumour between 1997 and 2007. The mean age was 46 years (7-87). Ten patients were lost to follow up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The mean MSTS score was 72.3 % and the mean TESS was 77.2 %.

Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This sub group of 4 patients had a mean MSTS score of 77.7 % and a mean TESS of 80.0%.

Endoprosthetic replacement for tumour of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good functional results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with the new constrained humeral liner.

Background

Revision THA presents significant challenges for the surgeon when the proximal femur is deficient or mechanically unreliable. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and functional results of the use of tumor enndoprosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur when there is massive bone loss.

Background

Endoprosthetic reconstruction is an established method of treatment for primary bone tumours in children. Traditionally these were implanted with cemented intramedullary fixation. Hydroxyapatite collars at the shoulder of the implant are now standard on all extremity endoprostheses, but older cases were implanted without collars. Uncemented intramedullary fixation with hydroxyapatite collars has also been used in an attempt to reduce the incidence of problems such as aseptic loosening. Currently there are various indications that dictate which method is used.

Introduction: The proximal humerus is one of the common site for neoplasms requiring excision and reconstruction. Out of more than 600 cases of bone tumours operated in the last 12 years, we have managed 33 cases of proximal humerus tumours with custom made megaprosthesis.

Methods: 33 cases of neoplastic involvement of upper end humerus, aged between 18–65 years (mean age 37 years) were operated over a period of 12 years (1995–2007). 23 were males and rest females. The primary lesions were: 19 giant cell tumours; 7 osteosarcoma; 4 chondrosarcoma; 1 metastatic; 2 Round cell sarcoma. The Enneking staging was: 1b(19), IIb(13), III(1). All patients with giant cell tumour had a break of cortex and a soft tissue component necessitating wide surgical excision. Surgery was the primary mode of treatment in all patients and was always undertaken with curative intent. Surgery was supplemented with appropriate chemo- radiotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma/ewing’s sarcoma. Surgical and functional results were evaluated according to MSTS scoring system.

Outcomes: The scoring ranged from 22–27.5%. The hand and elbow function was good in all while the shoulder abduction was always lost. The minimum follow up was 24 months.

Complications included: Superficial infection (1), deep infection (1); Recurrence 2; Improper cementing (2); Neuropraxia [radial nerve] (8); Subluxation of prosthesis head (8); Post radiotherapy skin necrosis and contracture (1); 4 patients died.

Conclusion: Adequate resection of malignant tumours/benign aggressive tumours in the shoulder region gives good oncological & surgical results. For post tumour excision humeral gaps, megaprosthesis is a near ideal choice.

Bipolar hip arthroplasty was introduced to alleviate the problems of hip pain, acetabular protrusion and femoral stem loosening associated with unipolar prosthesis. Earlier generation bipolar endoprosthesis used to cause varus fixation of outer head which led to the unacceptably high incidence of dislocation, component disassembly and fractures of the polyethylene bearing insert. Second generation endoprosthesis with a self centering mechanism were introduced to overcome these problems. This new design incorporates a polar offset by setting the center of rotation of the inner head proximal to the center of rotation of the outer head, which generates a valgus producing moment at the outer cup. There is a controversy whether this mechanism works in vivo, more so in indigenous prosthesis.

A retrospective observational study was done on 37 subjects, which included 21 males and 16 females. The first radiograph was taken with the patient standing and bearing full weight over the endoprosthetic leg and abducting the contra lateral limb as much as possible. The second radiograph was taken with the patient standing neutral and bearing weight on both the legs. Abduction and adduction views were then taken in supine position. The radiographs were analyzed using the method similar to that of Drinker and Murray. The adductive motion from abduction to neutral position is within the range of inner bearing oscillation. Modified Harris Hip Score was used to evaluate the patients clinically. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test, Students t-test and Karl Pearson correlation statistics.

The mean outer head alignment changed from 42.46 degrees ±13.62 (range 10 to 72 degrees) to 31.93 degrees ± 10.59 (range 8 to 50 degrees) in moving from abduction to neutral position in weight bearing position. The analysis showed that 68.66% of the total motion occurred at the outer bearing in weight bearing position whereas 73.86% of the total motion occurred at the outer bearing in supine position. The difference between distribution of motion between supine and weight bearing position was not found to be statistically different using Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test (p = 0.3164) and unpaired students t test (p = 0.35). No correlation was found between weight of the patient and time of follow up with outer head alignment and differential distribution of motion.

Self centering mechanism of bipolar endoprosthesis works in vivo under physiological loads and aligns the cup in neutral or valgus position till an average follow up of 10 months. Though the motion occurs at both the bearing surfaces outer bearing motion clearly predominated in both weight bearing as well as supine position.

Problem Wrong positioning of the acetabular cup leads to impingement, luxations and limited ROM. To improve the cup position computer assistant navigation systems had been developed. They are expensive, time consuming and sometimes no easy to handle.

Solution A new concept for the implantation of THP will be introduced: The cup position is not orientated as usual according to the body axis, but according to the stem position. Stem and cup are a closed biomechanical system, cup anteversion and inclination will be positioned according CCD angle and torsion of the stem.

With a new mechanical navigation system for the cup with a special cup probe and guiding system the best position is found intraoperatively according to ROM, impingement, luxation and tension of the muscles.

Results 150 patients had been operated. Optime is extended only 4–6 minutes, dysplasia inlays, impingement and luxations had disappered. The system is easy to handle and to sterilize routinely with the other op.-instruments.

Background: Chronic prosthetic joint infection is a cause of patient morbidity and can be challenging to treat. Surgeons performing revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee are confronted with a growing number of patients with extensive loss of bone stock. The use of a modular endoprosthesis is a possible method of treatment in such patients.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcomes and the success of a single and two stage revision procedure in eradicating chronic prosthetic joint infection using a femoral endoprosthesis.

Methods: A prospective database was reviewed of 20 patients who underwent a proximal, total or distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement after chronic prosthetic infection. Radiographs performed at the time of latest follow up were evaluated for signs of loosening, osteomyelitis and implant failure. The functional status was assessed using the Short Form (SF)-36 health survey score, Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) and the Enneking score.

Results: Thirteen patients underwent a single stage revision procedure and seven had been treated with a staged revision. At the latest follow up none of the 13 patients treated with a single stage procedure had evidence of ongoing infection. Of the seven patients who had a staged revision, 3 patients had evidence of ongoing infection. The mean pre operative Enneking score for the entire group was 17.1 points and this improved to 47.5 points post operatively (p< 0.0002). The mean pre operative TESS score for the entire group was 42% and this improved to 59% post operatively (p< 0.005). There was also a statistically significant improvement in all of the components of the SF-36 score.

Conclusion: We believe that the use of a modular endo-prosthesis in the treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection is a successful and viable option in eradicating infection, preserving the limb and providing a good functional result.

Purpose: To present the results of the use of shoulder prosthesis in multifragmented displaced humeral head fractures. Material-methods: 19 patients with comminuted and severely displaced fractures of the upper humeral epiphysis were treated with shoulder hemiar-throplasty. Their age varied from40 to 81 years (av:71). Seven patients had severely displaced four-part fracture; eight patients had four- part fracture-dislocation and four patients, three-part fracture dislocation with extended damage to humeral head articular surface. In 16 cases the arthroplasty was performed within 10 days, and in three, 6 weeks or more after the injury. The glenoid was not replaced in any of the cases. Results: The follow-up period was 16–84 months (av: 51). None of the patients had been reoperated, and none of the prosthesis was regarded ÒlooseÒ. The clinical assessment was done using the Constant-Murley scale. The score varied from 50 to 89 points, (av: 79). The average score for ÒpainÒ was 13(max 15) and for ÒmobilityÒ29(max 40). Average abduction reached 100 degrees and forward ßexion 110 degrees. At the last examination, 15 out of the 19 patients had returned to the previous social and occupational activities. Conclusions: The shoulder replacement offers satisfactory results in cases with comminuted and badly displaced fractures, but is a technically demanding procedure, and the time interval between injury and operation, strongly affects the result. Long lasting physiotherapy, patient compliance and cooperation are necessary for a satisfactory outcome.

Introduction:

The higher resisting torque against dislocation and the large range of motion due to the enlarged effective head diameter substantiate the use of eccentric dual-mobility cups in case of total hip joint instability [1,2]. As a result of force-dependent self-centering mechanism, an increased movement of the intermediate-component can be expected whose effect on wear propagation is unknown so far. Currently available hip joint simulators are only able to vary the load by the absolute value and not by the direction of resulting force. Therefore, the uniaxial force transmission may lead to a unique and stable alignment of the intermediate-component during testing. The purpose of this numerical study was to evaluate relative movements of the intermediate-component during daily life activities with respect to wear propagation.