Introduction. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion that occurs with a loose extension gap in TKA. In the setting of a loose extension gap, we hypothesized that although full extension is achieved, a loose extension gap will ultimately lead to increased varus and/or valgus laxity throughout mid flexion. Methods. After obtaining IRB approval, six fresh-frozen cadaver legs from hip-to-toe underwent TKA with a posterior stabilized implant (APEX PS OMNIlife Science, Inc.) using a computer navigation system equipped with a robotic cutting-guide, in this controlled laboratory cadaveric study. After the initial tibial and femoral resections were performed, and the flexion and extension gaps were balanced using navigation, a 4 mm distal recut was made in the distal femur to create a loose extension gap (using the same thickness of polyethylene as the well-balanced case). Real implants were used in the study to eliminate error in any laxity inherent to the trials. The navigation system was used to measure overall coronal plane laxity by measuring the mechanical alignment angle at maximum extension, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion, when applying a standardized varus/valgus load of 9.8 [Nm] across the knee using a 4 kg spring-load located at 25 cm distal to the knee joint line. (Figure 1). Coronal plane laxity was defined as the absolute difference (in degrees) between the mean mechanical alignment angle obtained from applying a standardized varus and valgus stress at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees. Each measurement was performed three separate times. Two tailed student t-tests were performed to analyze whether there was difference in the mean mechanical alignment angle at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° between the well balanced scenario and following a 4 mm recut in the distal femur creating a loose extension gap. Results. In the setting of a loose extension gap (4 mm distal recut), overall coronal-plane laxity was increased by a mean of 3.6° at 30° of flexion, 3.4° at 45° of flexion, and 2.8° at 60° of flexion (p < 0.05 for each flexion angle). (Figure 2) However, there was no difference in coronal plane laxity between the well-balanced TKA and the TKA with a loose extension gap at 0° and 90° of flexion, when applying a standardized varus and valgus load. Conclusions. Using a reliable, accurate, and reproducible method of measuring coronal plane laxity, we have shown that in the setting of a loose extension gap during total knee arthroplasty, coronal plane laxity will be significantly higher in mid-flexion compared to the well balanced state

[Introduction]. As an essential concept in TKA, preparing equalized rectangular extension and flexion gaps is recognized as desirable to ensure proper knee kinematics. However, in the ways that was recommended by an implant manufacturer, the adjustments are so difficult, and for inexperienced doctor, we don't have an ideal technique for an additional cutting up and ligament balancing. Then, the New method (Precut method) was introduced in order to enable an ideal adjustments. [Method]. Sixty eights patients with osteoarthritis of the knee received TKAs using Precut method. This method is the following. At first, proximal tibia was resected 10 mm by standard cutting device. And then, femoral posterior condyle was resected 4 mm lesser than cutting line by measured resection technique (Precut method). In the next, using the spacer block 1 mm unit and the Precut trial implant (8 mm; distal femur 4 mm; posterior condyle), we investigated the bone gap and the component gap (put the Precut trial on the distal femur). Finally, we calculated the amount of the final cutting value based on the component gap. The survey item measured the bone gap at extension and flexion, the component gap at extension and flexion after putting the Precut trial on. Then we compared the gap difference with and without the Precut trial. [Result]. Our results showed that the extension gap with the Precut trial was smaller than the predicted value with the Precut trial (mean: 8.66 mm/8.18 mm), the flexion gap with the Precut trial was larger than the predicted value with the Precut trial (mean: 13.2 mm/14.1 mm). The extension gap had reduced by 0.48 mm and the flexion gap enlarged by 0.3 mm. [Discussion]. In TKA, it is difficult to make extension gap and flexion gap equal. Therefore, after putting the final implant, we experienced the case s such as could not stretch fully in extension, such as had instability in flexion. However, in this method, we will earn the ideal stability in postoperative condition. It is because that after putting the Precut trial, we measured implant gap at extension and flexion, and then decided the final osteotomy value to eliminate the gap difference. [Conclusion]. As we measured extension gap and flexion gap in condition which put the Precut trial on, before the final osteotomy, we can make an equal gap at extension and flexion. We think a useful procedure for the stability after TKA

Introduction. A small medial extension gap (EG) needs posterior soft tissue release to avoid undesirable additional resection of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the effect of this procedure on the EG is not always sufficient because the EG is influenced not only by the posterior soft tissue but also by the medial collateral ligament (MCL). We hypothesize that contracture of the posterior capsule prevents full elongation of the MCL in extension and we investigated the efficacy of posteromedial vertical capsulotomy (PMVC) on the medial EG which separate MCL from the posterior capsule (Fig. 1). Materials and Methods. The PMVC was performed on 128 knees in which the medial extension gap was considered too small. The EG was initially created with a standard femoral distal cut and tibial cut. To estimate the gaps more precisely before flexion gap (FG) adjustment at the final step of the surgery, we performed a 4 mm precut of the posterior femoral condyle and measured the gaps with the patella reduced after setting a precut trial component that had a usual distal part and 4 mm thick posterior part of the femoral component. This situation was the same as after setting the usual femoral trial component by using the measured resection technique with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) (Fig. 2). The semimembranosus tendon was not released in any cases. Results. After the precut trial was set to the femur, the average EG and FG were 5.6 ± 2.0 mm and 10.0 ± 2.0 mm, respectively (mean ±SD). After performing the PMVC, the average increase of the EG and FG were 2.3 ± 1.4 mm and 0.1 ± 0.3 mm, respectively. The EG increase was significantly larger than the FG increase (p < 0.001). Twenty eight knees showed a 1 mm or less increase in the EG; however, 100 knees (78 %) had a 2 mm or greater increase in the EG with little increase in the FG. Initial gap difference (FG – EG) showed a positive corelation with EG increase after PMVC (R = 0.51, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Conclusions. To make adequate EG and FG, it is important to understand which soft tissue management is effective to increase the FG or the EG. To increase the FG only, PCL resection is useful. However, the effective methodology of widening the EG without changing the FG is unknown. The EG of the varus knee is influenced by several factors such as tightness of the MCL, the posterior capsule, the semimembranosus tendon and protrusion of the posterior femoral component. In this study, a precut trial component was used to take into account the effect of posterior protrusion of the femoral component and the semimembranosus tendon was not released and we achieved a selective EG increase without changing the FG by the PMVC which allowed the MCL and the posterior capsule to act freely from each other

Purpose. Degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee usually shows arthritic change in the medial tibiofemoral joint with severe varus deformity. In TKA, the medial release technique is often used for achieving mediolateral balancing, but there is some disagreement regarding the importance of pursuing the perfect rectangular gaps. Our hypothesis is that the minimal release especially in MCL is beneficial regarding on retaining the physiological medial stability and knee kinematics, which leads to improved functional outcome. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the thickness of the tibia resection if the extent of the medial release is minimized to preserve the medial soft tissue in TKA. Patients and Methods. Thirty TKAs were performed for varus osteoarthritis by a single surgeon. In the TKA, femoral bone was prepared according to the measured resection technique, bilateral meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament were excised. After the osteophytes surrounding the femoral posterior condyle were removed, the knee with the femoral trial component was fully extended and the amount of the tibial bone cut was decided for the 10mm tibial insert by referring to the medial joint line of the femoral trial component. After the every bone preparation and placement of all the trial components, If flexion contracture due to the narrow extension gap was found, additional tibial bone cut or medial soft tissue release were performed. Results. MCL deep layer release was performed following the medial meniscus removal in all the TKAs, additional tibial bone cut was performed for three cases, but there was no additional medial soft tissue treatment in any TKAs. Final extension gap in the medial side was 21.2 mm, the average of the tibial insert thickness actually used was 10.6 mm, and the thickness of all the femoral implant at the distal part was 9 mm, therefore the residual medial extension gap in extension was averaged 1.8 ± 0.54 mm. On the other hand, the thickness of the tibial bone cut in the lateral side was various from 11 mm to 16 mm (average was 12.9 ± 1.13 mm). Discussion and Conclusions. All the TKAs in this study were performed to create the proper medial stability in extension without excessive medial release by cutting the adequately thck tibial bone, which lead to thicker tibia resection than the applied tibial insert in the lateral side. As lateral laxity is necessary for the medial pivot movement of the normal knee, slight lateral laxity can be accepted with TKA. The balance between lateral laxity and medial stability in both extension and flexion has not been well elucidated, further studies are necessary regarding on in vivo kinematic

Introduction. Appropriate osteotomy alignment and soft tissue balance are essential for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The management of soft tissue balance still remains difficult and it is left much to the surgeon's subjective feel and experience. We developed an offset type tensor system for TKA. This device enables objective soft tissue balance measurement with more physiological joint conditions with femoral trial component in place and patello-femoral (PF) joint reduced. We have reported femoral component placement decreased extension gap. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of femoral component size selection on the decrease of extension gap in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Material & Method. 120 varus type osteoarthritic knees implanted with PS TKAs (NexGen LPS flex: Zimmer) were subjected to this study. All TKAs were performed using measured resection technique with anterior reference. The femoral component size was evaluated intra-operatively using conventional femoral sizing jig. The selected femoral component size was expressed by the antero-posterior (AP) size increase (mm) comparing to that of original femoral condyles. Gap measurements were performed using a newly developed offset type tensor device applying 40lbs (178N) of joint distraction force. Firstly, conventional osteotomy gaps (mm) were measured at extension and flexion. Secondary, component gaps (mm) after femoral trial placement with PF joint reduced were evaluated at 0° and 90° of knee flexion. To compare conventional osteotomy gaps and component gaps, estimated extension and flexion gaps were calculated by subtracting the femoral component thickness at extension (9mm) and flexion (11mm) from conventional osteotomy gaps respectively. The decrease of gap at extension and flexion were calculated with estimated gaps subtracted by component gaps. The simple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of selected femoral component size on the decrease of gap after femoral component placement. Results. The mean extension and flexion conventional osteotomy gaps were 25.7 and 28.2 mm, and estimated gaps were 16.7, 17.2 mm respectively. The component gaps were 11.1, 16.9 mm at 0° and 90° of knee flexion respectively. Extension joint gap was significantly decreased as much as 5.6mm after femoral component placement, but flexion gap showed no significant differences. Selected femoral component size showed a positive correlation to the decrease of gap after femoral component placement (Fig 1). Discussion & Conclusion. This result indicates that AP femoral component size variation affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap in PS TKA. With the larger femoral component size selected, the more protrusion of posterior condyles would increase the more tension on the posterior structures and resulted in the more decrease of joint gap after femoral component placement at full extension. This mechanism might play a physiological role on the prevention of knee hyper-extension, and would be affected by flexion contracture. Accordingly, we conclude that the surgeon should aware of the effect of femoral component placement on the gap control, and femoral component size selection affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap after femoral component placement in PS TKA

Total knee replacement (TKA) surgery is an excellent and well-proven procedure for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the knee. Many refinements have taken place over time in an attempt to improve the components, wear qualities of the polyethylene, and the surgical technique to improve accuracy of component positioning, reduce patient pain, improve postoperative range of motion, ultimately improve results and to prolong the time until revision surgery may occur. This study examines the results of a gap balancing surgical technique in which components were implanted that had a posterior cruciate substituting design. This technique is performed with exacting alignment and balancing of the flexion and extension gaps prior to implantation of the knee components. The follow up is at a minimum of ten years. 515 consecutive knee replacements were followed prospectively for a minimum of ten years. The average age at surgery was 70 years, 73% of patients were female, with an average BMI of 31. All patients carried a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and a cemented, posterior stabilized design TKA (Balanced Knee System, Ortho Development) was implanted. All cases were performed by one of two experienced joint replacement surgeons. The surgical technique demanded flexion and extension gap balancing as well as soft tissue balancing prior to finishing cuts being performed on the femoral side (See figures 1 and 2). Polyethylene spacers come in 1 millimeter increments. 28% of patients died postoperatively at an average of 7.4 years. These patients were older on average at the time of index surgery (76.6 years). None had undergone revision surgery. Of the remaining patients Knee Society scores (39 preop to 91 post op at ten years), function scores and range of motion all improved significantly. What's more, these results were not diminished at ten years. There were no component failures and less than 1% radiographic progressive lucent lines. Eleven revision surgeries (2.1 %) were performed with 2 acute superficial wound revisions, 3 late infections, one patellar tendon disruption from a fall at 7 years (BMI 45.7), 2 complete revisions performed elsewhere for unsatisfactory results, and 3 spacer exchanges for perception of postoperative laxity. For the current study we also examined subgroups of the morbidly obese, octogenarians, and those with a preoperative valgus deformity of greater than 15%. At follow-up these subgroups fared very well with the exception of the heaviest BMI's being limited in range of motion because of soft tissue impingement. Results suggest that this balancing technique gives excellent results with few complications at ten year evaluation. We believe that careful attention to bony and soft tissue balancing and equalization of gaps in flexion and in extension will prove beneficial for TKA longevity in even longer-term evaluation. Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate gap balancing blocks and alignment rods in extension and in flexion

Introduction:. Proper component orientation and soft tissue balancing are essential for longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in young and active patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results and quality of TKA in young and active patients with extension first gap balancing technique, in 2 Posterior-Stabilized (PS) total knee designs with identical femoral component. Material and Methods:. 43 consecutive Rotating-Platform (RP-PS, 33 patients) and 38 Fixed-Bearing (FB-PS, 29 patients) with University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score of 5 or above and mean age was 53 ± 1.5 years were followed prospectively for a minimum of 10 years. 18 random TKAs were analyzed for component rotation using MRI. Results:. The majority of patients (77%, 24 patients in RP-PS and 65%, 25 patients in FB-PS) were still participating in recreational activities at final follow-up. There was no case of early or late mid flexion instability causing spinout. There was no malalignment or patellofemoral maltracking. Non-progressive radiolucency was seen at the tibial zone 1 in one of the RP-PS and 3 of the FB-PS knees. The mean femoral rotation was 2 and 3 degrees of external in relation to the transepicondylar axis in RP-PS and in FB-PS, respectively. Two patients in the FB-PS were revised (one for per-prosthetic fracture and one for osteolysis and loosening). There were no revisions in the RP-PS group. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years was 100% in RP-PS and 97% in FB-PS. Discussion and Conclusions:. Extension first gap balancing technique is a safe, accurate, and reproducible with excellent alignment and long-term durability and high quality of function in young, active patients

Introduction. Robotic TKA allows for quantifiable precision performing bone resections for implant realignment within acceptable final component and limb alignments. One of the early steps in this robotic technique is after initial exposure and removal of medial and lateral osteophytes, a “pose-capture” is performed with varus and valgus stress applied to the knee in near full extension and 90° of flexion to assess gaps. Component alignment adjustments can be made on the preoperative plan to balance the gaps. At this point in the procedure any posterior osteophytes will still be present, which could after removal change the flexion and extension gaps by 1–3mm. This must be taken into consideration, or changes in component alignment could result in over-correction of gaps can occur. Objective. The purpose of this study was to identify what effect the posterior osteophyte's size and location and their removal had on gap measurements between pose-capture and after bone cuts are made and gaps assessed during implant trialing. Methods. This was a retrospective, single center cohort study comparing 100 robotic-assisted TKAs. Preoperative computer tomography was assessed for the presence, size and location of posterior osteophytes. Robotic-assessed gaps at pose capture and trialing were collected. Paired t-tests, independent t-tests and Pearson's correlation were used to examine this relationship. Results. Posterior osteophytes were present in 87% of cases with 59.3% isolated to the posterior medial femoral condyle. In the sagittal plane, posterior medial femoral condyle (pMFC), posterior lateral femoral condyle (pLFC) and posterior tibial (pT) osteophytes measured 6.75 ± 2.7mm, 5.77 ± 2.8mm, and 6.52 ± 3.14mm respectively. There was a significant increase in medial (17.4 ± 2.7mm vs 19.7 ± 2.2mm, p<0.01) and lateral (19.2 ± 2.2mm vs 20.5 ± 1.9mm, p<0.01) extension gaps from pose-capture to trialing. There was no difference in the delta of medial extension gaps from pose-change to trialing for knees with pMFC osteophytes > or < 5mm (2.1 ± 2.3 mm vs 2.4 ± 2.1mm, p=0.56). Similarly, there was no difference in the change in lateral extension gaps from pose-capture to trialing for knees with lateral posterior osteophytes > or < 5mm (1.2 ± 2.0mm vs 1.73 ± 1.53mm, p = 0.37). There was no statistically significant correlation between medial or lateral osteophyte size and change in medial (r=0.12, p=0.27) or lateral (r=0.11, p=0.36) extension gaps respectively. Conclusion. While there is a significant change in robotically assessed gaps at pose-capture and trialing, this change is small, our study findings are not able to substantiate that it is solely due to the presence, size or location of posterior osteophytes. A post-hoc power analysis indicates that, in order to detect a difference in gap between pose-capture and trialing of 1mm, over 75 knees with and without posterior osteophytes would be needed

Purpose. Despite total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful surgical procedure with end-stage knee osteoarthritis, approximately 20% of the patients who underwent primary TKA were still dissatisfied with the outcome. Thereby, numerous literatures have confirmed the relationship between soft tissue balancing and clinical result to improve this pressing issue. Recently, there has been an increased research interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after TKA. However, there is little agreement on the association between soft tissue balancing and PROMs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative soft tissue balancing affected PROMs after primary TKA. We hypothesized that soft tissue balancing would be a predictive factor for postoperative PROMs at one-year post-surgery. Patients and Methods. The study included 20 knees treated for a varus osteoarthritic deformity using a cruciate-retaining TKA (Scorpio NRG) with a polyethylene insert thickness of 8 mm retrospectively. Following the osteotomy using the measured resection technique, the extension gap was measured with a femoral trial by using an electric tensor. This instrument could estimate the soft tissue balance applying continuous distraction force simultaneously from 0 to 40 lbf with an accuracy of the 0.1 lbf. We evaluated the association between a distraction force required for an extension gap of 8 mm, and the following potentially affected factors at one year postoperatively: knee flexion angle using a protractor with one degree increments; radiographic parameters of component alignment, namely the femoral and tibial component medial angle; and the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM). This is a disease-specific and self-administered questionnaire, reflecting the specificity of the Japanese cultural lifestyle, consisting of 25 items scored from 0 to 100 points, with 100 points being worst. Outcomes. The median knee flexion angle was 130 degrees with the femoral and tibial component of 97 and 89 degrees, respectively. For an extension gap of 8 mm, a verified value of a distraction force did not demonstrate a correlation with, knee flexion angle (p = 0.29) or with the femoral (p = 0.20), and tibial component position (p = 0.09). The median JKOM totaled 20 points across 4 domains: pain and stiffness, condition in daily life, general activities, and health conditions with 5, 8, 2.5, and 2 points respectively. There was significant correlation between a required force and the JKOM (r. s. = 0.53, p = 0.02), and notably the domain of health conditions exhibited the highest coefficient of determination (r. s. = 0.54, p = 0.01). Discussion. This study highlights that distraction force for an extension gap of 8 mm is an independent variable in component position or knee flexion angle. We found that soft tissue balancing could influence short term postoperative PROMs. Our results will contribute to a better understanding of outcomes after TKA. This is a particularly critical issue as feasible strategies to avoid a persistent joint stiffness would improve long-term function after TKA and patient satisfaction

Introduction. By all developments of new technologies on the improvement of the Total Knee implantation, the discussion about the optimum Alignment is in full way. Besides, is to be considered, that Alignment contains not only static, but also dynamic factors and beside the frontal plan also the sagittal plan as well as in particular the rotation in femur and tibia have a great importance for the outcome after TKR. However, beside the bone alignment, the kapsulo-igamentous structures also play an important role for the results after TKR. If a Varus-Malalignment was valid, in the past the „older” literature described it as a big risk factor for pain, less function and durability. However, in the present literature, we discuss more and more about the optimum Alignment during TKR. In particular, newer publications show no interference of the durability with coronar Alignment also outside from 3 °, also the score results and patient's satisfaction seem to deliver no worse results with slight untercorrection of the varus alignment. Some publications described even better score results and Patient satisfaction with slight untercorrection. Condition for it is probably an exact balancing of the extension and flexion gap. Material and method. With a new developed instruments it was examined with a tibia and extensions-Gap-First-Technique, to what extent a correction of the AMA opposed after digital planning within from 3 ° in distal femur a balancierung of the extension gap could be reached under avoidance of 3° releases with a varusarthritis oft the knee. 103 directly knee arthroplasties following on each other were selected with Varus-OA without exclusion criteria. Surgical technology. Midvastus-Approach, mostly in LIS technology. Besides, tibial 1–2 ° release and the following resection of the exophytes medial, lateral and intercondylar. External adjustment of the proxima tibia cut, place adjustable (Varus/Valgus, Slope) cutting block, control of the varus-(valgus position and slope after Fixation and if necessary postcorrection of these parameters. Resection of the proximal tibia. Next intramedullar adjustment of teh ditals femur cut according digital planning and fixation the adjustable/Varus/Valgus) cutting block for the distal femur resection. Insert the the ligament balancer between the promiumal tibia cut and the the dital femur in extension and examination of the parallelism between prox. Tibia and planned distal femur resektion with the same tension medial and lateral. If necessary correction of the cutting block within 3 ° to the achievement of a balanced extension gap, otherwise further releases necessary to create a balanced extension gap. Distale Femurresektion. Insert the the ligament balancer again between the promimal tibia cut and the the posterior femur condyles in 90° flexion with the same tension medial and lateral. Next step is to transfer the proximal tibia cut on distal Femur to determine femur rotation in gap balance technology. Fixation of the new developed sizing instrumet, final definition of the implant size of the femur according anterior and posterior referencing to avoid undercuts or overstuffing anterior and a reconstructi the posterior offset. Drilling of the admission holes for the 4 in 1 cutting block and at first posterior re section with following resection of posterior exophytes and the possibility of a posterior capsule release. Adapt the extension gap on the flexion gap by means of modular spacer blocks and perhaps necessary postresection oft he distal femur. Now realisation of the remaining femoral cuts with the 4 in 1-cutting block. Results. With 102 of 103 knee prosthesis implantations with Varus-OA a balancing of the extension gap could be realized, outgoing by the presurgical planning with max. 3 ° corrections on the distal femur cut. Only in a 1 case, a 3° release was necessary to achieve a balanced extension gap. The rotation according the posterior condyles with 102 within 3 ° correctable VarusOA lay between 0 and 8 ° with a frequency summit between 4 and 6 °. Summary. With the described Surgical technology by use a ligament tensioner and new developed instruments the balancing of the extension gap with slight to avarage medial release could be carried out in nearly all cases, so that the rotation could take place in these cases also in Gap-balance technology. Therefore it is possible with this technology beside a bone-saving TKR also sparing the capsulo-ligamtous structures. This thereby still wins on importance, that after newer literature data the kapsulo-ligamentous structures show a more physiological tension, in contrast to the correction to the neutral position, with light untercorrection of the preexistently varus deformity. In a projected prospektiv multicenter study we like to find answers to the questions about constitutional or residual Varus-Alignment after TKR in Varus-OA. Further question is if we can also compiled a sure zone within which an untercorrection is admissible

Introduction. Valgus deformity in an end stage osteoarthritic knee can be difficult to correct with no clear consensus on case management. Dependent on if the joint can be reduced and the degree of medial laxity or distension, a surgeon must use their discretion on the correct method for adequate lateral releases. Robotic assisted (RA) technology has been shown to have three dimensional (3D) cut accuracy which could assist with addressing these complex cases. The purpose of this work was to determine the number of soft tissue releases and component orientation of valgus cases performed with RA total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This study was a retrospective chart review of 72 RATKA cases with valgus deformity pre-operatively performed by a single surgeon from July 2016 to December 2017. Initial and final 3D component alignment, knee balancing gaps, component size, and full or partial releases were collected intraoperatively. Post-operatively, radiographs, adverse events, WOMAC total and KOOS Jr scores were collected at 6 months, 1 year and 2 year post-operatively. Results. Pre-operatively, knee deformities ranged from reducible knees with less than 5mm of medial laxity to up to 12° with fixed flexion contracture. All knees were corrected within 2.5 degrees of mechanical neutral. Average femoral component position was 0.26. o. valgus, and 4.07. o. flexion. Average tibial component position was 0.37. o. valgus, and 2.96. o. slope, where all tibial components were placed in a neutral or valgus orientation. Flexion and extension gaps were within 2mm (mean 1mm) for all knees. Medial and lateral gaps were balanced 100% in extension and 93% in flexion. The average flexion gap was 18.3mm and the average extension gap was 18.7mm. For component size prediction, the surgeon achieved their planned within one size on the femur 93.8% and tibia 100% of the time. The surgeon upsized the femur in 6.2% of cases. Soft tissue releases were reported in one of the cases. At latest follow-up, radiographic evidence suggested well seated and well fixed components. Radiographs also indicated the patella components were tracking well within the trochlear groove. No revision and re-operation is reported. Mean WOMAC total scores were improved from 24±8.3 pre-op to 6.6±4.4 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Mean KOOS scores were improved from 46.8±9.7 pre-op to 88.4±13.5 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Discussion. In this retrospective case review, the surgeon was able to balance the knee with bone resections and avoid disturbing the soft tissue envelope in valgus knees with 1–12° of deformity. To achieve this balance, the femoral component was often adjusted in axial and valgus rotations. This allowed the surgeon to open lateral flexion and extension gaps. While this study has several limitations, RATKA for valgus knees should continue to be investigated. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Objective. Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective and safe treatment for osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. However, mobile-bearing UKA needs accurate ligament balancing of flexion and extension gaps to prevent dislocation of the mobile meniscal bearing. Instability can lead to dislocation of the insert. The phase 3 instruments of the Oxford UKA use a balancing technique for the flexion gap (90° of flexion) and extension gap (20° of flexion), thereby focusing attention on satisfactory soft tissue balancing. With this technique, spacers are used to balance the flexion and extension gap. However, gap kinematics in another flexion angle of mobile-bearing UKA is unclear. We developed UKA tensor for mobile-bearing UKA and we assessed the accurate gap kinematics of UKA. Materials and Methods. Between 2012 and 2013, The Phase 3 Oxford Partial Knee UKA (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, IN) were carried out in 48 patients (71 knees) for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial compartment. The mean age of patients at surgery was 71.6 years and the mean follow-up period was 1.7 years. The mean preoperative coronal plane alignment was 7.4° in varus. The indications for UKA included disabling knee pain with medial compartment disease; intact ACL and collateral ligaments; preoperative contracture of less than 15°; and preoperative deformity of <15°. Each surgery was performed by using different spacer block with 1-mm increments and the meniscal bearing lift-off tests according to surgical technique. We developed newly tensor for mobile bearing UKA which designed to permit surgeons to measure multiple range of the joint medial compartment/joint component gap, while applying a constant joint distraction force (Figure 1). We assessed the intra-operative joint gap measurements at 0, 20, 60, 90 and 120 of flexion with 100N, 125N and 150N of joint distraction forces. Results. The gaps measured were 0°: 8.6 ± 1.6, 20°: 9.2 ± 1.4, 60°: 9.6 ± 1.2, 90°: 11.1 ± 1.3, 120°: 11.6 ± 1.8 in 100 N, 0°: 9.7 ± 1.7, 20°: 11.2 ± 1.3, 60°: 11.4 ± 1.3, 90°: 11.9 ± 1.5, 120°: 10.4 ± 1.6 in 125 N, 0°: 11.3±1.4, 20°: 11.8 ± 1.3, 60°: 11.1 ± 1.2, 90°: 12.5 ± 1.3, 120°: 11.9 ± 1.6 in 150N (Figure 2). There was a significant difference between full extension to extension (20° of flexion) and flexion (90° of flexion) to full flexion (120° of flexion). Conclusion. Mobile bearing UKA instrumentation using a balancing technique by spacer block for the flexion gap (90° of flexion) and extension gap (20° of flexion), full extension gap was significantly smaller than extension gap and flexion gap was significantly smaller than full flexion gap in 100N, 125N and 150N of joint distraction forces

Objective. In a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) for patients with flexion contracture, to ensure that an extension gap is of sufficient size to install an implant, the amount of distal femur bone resection needed is frequently larger in a patient with knee flexion contracture than in one without contracture. In this study, we compared the distal femur bone resection amount, the component-secured extension gap margin value, and the range of motion at 6 months after surgery between patients with knee flexion contracture and those without knee flexion contracture. Method. We examined 51 joints including 27 joints in patients with preoperative extension limitation of less than 5 degrees (the F0 group) and 24 joints in patients with limitation of 15 degrees or larger (up to 33 degrees; the FC group) who underwent CR-TKA with LCS RP (DePuy Synthes) between May 2013 and April 2014. In case with an extension gap 3 mm or smaller than the flexion gap after initial bone resection, we released posterior capsule adequately, trying to minimize the distal femur additional bone resection amount as possible. With installation of a femoral trial, the component gaps were measured using spacer blocks. The measured parameters included the intraoperative bone resection length, gap difference (FG − EG, i.e., difference between the flexion gap [FG] and extension gap [EG]), and range of motion 6 months after surgery. Results. No inter-group difference was found in the length of the distal femur bone initially resected in the medial side of distal femur(F0: 6.7 ± 1.3 mm, FC: 6.1 ± 1.4 mm) and total length of bone resection (= first + additional resection) in the lateral proximal tibia (F0: 10.3 ± 1.9 mm, FC: 10.4 ± 2.1 mm). The length of the additional distal femur bone resected was 0.9 ± 1.3 mm in the F0 and 1.5 ± 1.2 mm in the FC (P = 0.06; Mann-Whitney U). The FG-EG (F0: 0.7 ± 0.9 mm, FC: 0.6 ± 0.8 mm) showed no remarkable inter-group difference. The mean range of motion was changed from −2.3° to −0.6° at extension and from 130.4° to 128.7° at flexion in the F0 and from −19.8° to −2.7° at extension and from 113.7° to 122.3° at flexion in the FC. Conclusions. The amount of distal femur bone resected should not be simply increased because this may elevate the joint line, narrow the flexion range, and cause the joint instability in mid-flexion. The results of this study show that, in CR-TKA for patients with flexion contracture up to 30°, the length of distal femoral bone resection of approximately 1 mm larger than that in patients without contracture may ensure an extension gap of necessary and sufficient length to install an implant

In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), extension gap commonly decreases after inserting the trial components. As most of UKA technique incorporates the fixture of implants using bone cement, it is likely that the gap decreases further when inserting the actual implants. We performed a new additional procedure that enables a precise adjustment of the extension gap. Thirty-two patients who had undergone UKA (ZIMMER Unicompartmental High-Flex Knee System, Zimmer®, Warsaw) using the spacer block technique at our hospital in 2013 were reviewed. Ten cases had difficulties in achieving full extension after the trial implants were inserted, and hence, a new procedure of longitudinal incision between the medial collateral ligament and the posterior capsule was performed. This additional method created a mean increase of 3mm of the extension gap, and facilitated the knee to extend completely. There were no cases that had an increase in the flexion gap. Previously, a tibial osteotomy was added in such cases, but this had a risk of increasing not just the extension gap but also the flexion gap. This method is a valid technique for precise adjustments, and could also be applied to patients with severe flexion contracture to treat by UKA

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgical techniques attempt to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps to produce a well-balanced knee. Anterior knee pain, which is not addressed by flexion-extension balancing, is one of the more common complaints for TKA patients. The variation in patellofemoral balance resulting from the techniques to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps has not been widely studied. Purpose of study. The purpose of the study is to determine the effects on cruciate retaining (CR) TKA patellofemoral balance when equal flexion and extension gaps are maintained while changing femur implant size and/or adjusting the femur and tibia implant proximal -distal and femur anterior-posterior positions. Methods. A computational analysis was performed simulating knee flexion of two CR TKA designs (JOURNEY II CR and LEGION HFCR; Smith & Nephew) using previously validated software (LifeMOD/KneeSim; LifeModeler). Deviations from the ideal implant position were simulated by adjusting tibiofemoral proximal-distal position and femur anterior-posterior position and size (Table 1). Positioning the femur more proximal was accompanied by equal anterior femur and proximal tibia shifts to maintain equal flexion and extension gaps. The forces in the medial and lateral retinaculum were collected and summed at every 15° knee flexion up to 135° to determine the total patellofemoral retinaculum load which was analyzed versus proximal-distal implant position, implant size, implant design, and knee flexion using an ANOVA in Minitab 16 (Minitab). Results. Patellofemoral retinaculum load was significantly affected by proximal-distal implant position, implant size, and knee flexion angle (p<.001) but was not significantly affected by implant design (p>0.2). Interactions with knee flexion angle were significant for both proximal-distal implant position (p<.001) and implant size (p=.003) indicating that their effects change with knee flexion (Figures 1 and 2). For 15°–30° knee flexion, more proximal tibiofemoral positions corresponding to a more anterior femur increased patellofemoral retinaculum load. Implant position had little effect at 45° knee flexion. For 60°–135° knee flexion, more proximal implant positions decreased patellofemoral retinaculum load. Increased femoral size caused increased patellofemoral retinaculum load with a larger effect for 15–45° knee flexion. Conclusions. Our results indicate that patellofemoral balance should be considered when selecting implant size and position for flexion-extension balancing. The more common adjustment of positioning implants more proximal decreases patellofemoral retinaculum load in flexion, but the anterior femoral shift to balance the flexion space overstuffs the patella near extension. Downsizing the femoral implant is an option to mitigate increased patellofemoral retinaculum load when shifting the femoral anterior. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction. Accurate soft tissue balancing in knee arthroplasty is essential in order to attain good postoperative clinical results. In mobile-bearing UKA (Oxford Partial Knee unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Biomet), since determination of the thickness of the spacer block depends on the individual surgeon, it will vary and it will be difficult to attain appropriate knee balancing. The first objective of the present study was to investigate flexion and extension medial unicompartmental knee gap kinematics in conjunction with various joint distraction forces. The second objective of the study was to investigate the accuracy of gap measurement using a spacer block and a tensor device. Methods. A total of 40 knees in 31 subjects (5 men and 26 women) with a mean age of 71.5 years underwent Oxford UKA for knee osteoarthritis and idiopathic osteonecrosis of the medial compartment. According to instructions of Phase 3 Oxford UKA, spacer block technique was used to make the extension gap equal to the flexion gap. Adequate thickness of the spacer block was determined so that the surgeon could easily insert and remove it with no stress. Following osteotomy, the tensor devise was used to measure the medial compartmental gap between the femoral trial prosthesis and the tibial osteotomy surface (joint component gap) (Fig. 1 and 2). The medial gap was measured at 20° of knee flexion (extension gap) and 90° of knee flexion (flexion gap) with 25N, 50N, 75N, 100N, 125N, 150N of joint distraction force. Corresponding size of bearing was determined for the prosthesis. The interplay gap was calculated by subtracting the thickness of the tibial prosthesis and the thickness of the selected size of bearing from the measured extension and flexion gaps. Results. The selected bearing size was 3 mm: 3 knees, 4 mm: 20 knees, 5 mm: 15 knees and 6 mm: 2 knees. The mean flexion gap in the medial compartment was 25N: 8.4 ± 1.6 mm, 50N: 9.4 ± 1.6 mm, 75N: 10.4 ± 1.5 mm, 100N: 11.0 ± 1.4 mm, 125N: 11.6 ± 1.5 mm, 150N: 11.9 ± 1.4 mm. The mean extension gap was 25N: 7.8 ± 1.6 mm, 50N: 8.8 ± 1.6 mm, 75N: 9.7 ± 1.6 mm, 100N: 10.4 ± 1.5 mm, 125N: 11.1 ± 1.5 mm, 150N: 11.4 ± 1.5 mm. The mean flexion interplay gap was 25N: 0.5 ± 1.2 mm, 50N: 1.5 ± 1.2 mm, 75N: 2.4 ± 1.1 mm, 100N: 3.1 ± 1.0 mm, 125N: 3.6 ± 1.1 mm, 150N: 4.0 ± 1.1 mm. The mean extension interplay gap was 25N: −0.2 ± 1.2 mm, 50N: 0.8 ± 1.1 mm, 75N: 1.7 ± 1.2 mm, 100N: 2.5 ± 1.2 mm, 125N: 3.1 ± 1.2 mm, 150N: 3.5 ± 1.2 mm. When flexion and extension of the interplay gap were compared, the extension interplay gap was shown to be significantly smaller compared with the flexion interplay gap at every joint distraction force (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The mean extension interplay gap was shown to be significantly smaller compared with the flexion interplay gap at every joint distraction force even though the extension gap was adjusted to the flexion gap using the spacer block. This suggests that in the actual UKA operative technique using a spacer block there is a potential that the extension gap will be smaller than the flexion gap. Surgeons should be aware of this fact and adjust the flexion and extension gaps with caution when performing mobile-bearing UKA

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgical techniques attempt to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps to produce a well-balanced knee, but unexplainable unhappy patients persist. Mid-flexion instability is one proposed cause of unhappy patients. There are multiple techniques to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps, but their effects in mid-flexion are largely unknown. Purpose of study. The purpose of the study is to determine the effects that changing femur implant size and/or adjusting the femur and tibia proximal -distal and femur anterior-posterior implant positions have on cruciate retaining (CR) TKA mid-flexion ligament balance when equal flexion and extension gaps are maintained. Methods. A computational analysis was performed simulating knee flexion of two CR TKA designs (JOURNEY II CR and LEGION HFCR; Smith & Nephew) using previously validated software (LifeMOD/KneeSim; LifeModeler). Deviations from the ideal implant position were simulated by adjusting tibiofemoral proximal-distal position and femur anterior-posterior position and size (Table 1). Positioning the femur more proximal was accompanied by equal anterior femur and proximal tibia shifts to maintain equal flexion and extension gaps. The forces in ligaments connecting the femur and tibia, which included superficial and posterior MCL, LCL, popliteal-fibular ligament complex, iliotibial band, and anterior-lateral and posterior-medial PCL, were collected. Total tibiofemoral ligament load and PCL load for 15–75° knee flexion were analyzed versus proximal-distal implant position, implant size, implant design, and knee flexion using a MANOVA in Minitab 16 (Minitab). Results. Total tibiofemoral ligament load was significantly reduced by a more proximal implant position (p<.001) (Figure 1) but was not affected by implant size (p>0.6). PCL load was not affected by implant proximal-distal position or size (p>0.9) (Figure 2). Therefore, the PCL did not contribute to changes in mid-flexion balance caused by proximal-distal implant position. Implant design and knee flexion significantly influenced total tibiofemoral ligament and PCL loads (p<.05), but the interactions with implant proximal-distal position and size were not significant (p>0.7) indicating that the effects of implant proximal-distal position applies across the studied implant designs and 15°–75° knee flexion range. Conclusions. Our results suggest that a CR TKA can be well balanced at 0° and 90° knee flexion and be too tight or loose in mid-flexion. Since placement of implant was the variable studied, when the knee is too tight in mid-flexion, our recommendation to loosen the knee is to resect more distal and posterior femur, downsizing if necessary, and increase the tibial insert thickness. The opposite could be done to guard against the knee being too loose in mid-flexion. Finally, it is recommended to gauge balance in more than simply 0° and 90° to determine overall knee balance

INTRODUCTION. Use of a novel ligament gap balancing instrumentation system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) resulted in femoral component external rotation values which were higher on average, compared to measured bone resection systems. In one hundred twenty knees in 110 patients the external rotation averaged 6.9 degrees (± 2.8) and ranged from 0.6 to 12.8 degrees. The external rotation values in this study were 4° and 2° larger, respectively, than the typical 3° and 5° discrete values that are common to measured resection systems. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of these greater external rotation values for the femoral component on patellar tracking, flexion stability and function of two different TKA implant designs. METHODS. In the first arm of the study, 120 knees in 110 patients were consecutively enrolled by a single surgeon using the same implant design (single radius femur with a medial constraint tibial liner) across subjects. All patients underwent arthroplasty with tibial resection first and that set external rotation of the femoral component based upon use of a ligament gap balancing system. Following ligament tensioning / balancing, the femur was prepared. The accuracy of the ligament balancing system was assessed by reapplying equal tension to the ligaments using a tensioning bolt and torque wrench in flexion and extension after the bone resections had been made. The resulting flexion and extension gaps were then measured to determine rectangular shape and equality of the gaps. Postoperative Merchant views were obtained on all of the patients and patellar tracking was assessed and compared to 120 consecutive total knee arthroplasties previously performed by the same surgeon with the same implant using a measured resection system. In the second arm of the study, 100 unilateral knees in 100 patients were consecutively enrolled. The same instrumentation and technique by the same surgeon was used, but with a different implant design (single radius femur without a medial constraint tibial liner). RESULTS. Rectangular flexion and extension gaps were obtained within ± 0.5mm in all cases. Equality of the flexion and extension gaps was also obtained within ± 0.5mm in all cases. Merchant views of the total knee arthroplasties showed central patellar tracking with no tilt or subluxation in 90% of the ligament gap balanced knees and 74% of the measured resection knees. Arthrofibrosis resulting in a closed manipulation under anesthesia was required in 6% of the knees with single radius femurs and medial constaint tibial liners, but only in 1% of the single radius femur knees without medial constraint liners. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. External rotation values are higher on average, when ligament tensioning / balancing is employed with this novel system compared to measured resection systems. In this study this resulted in consistent matching of the flexion gap to the extension gap and better patellar tracking. These findings suggest that limiting the surgeon to discrete rotation values may be at odds with where the femur “desires” to be, given soft tissue considerations for each patient. Also, even with ideal soft tissue balancing, TKA implant design can have a significant affect on the outcome measure of development of arthrofibrosis

Introduction. Acquiring adaptive soft-tissue balance is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there have been few reports regarding to alteration of tolerability of varus/valgus stress between before and after TKA. In particular, there is no enough data about mid-flexion stability. Based on these backgrounds, it is hypothesized that alteration of varus/valgus tolerance may influence post-operative results in TKA. The purpose of this study is an investigation of in vivo kinematic analyses of tolerability of varus/valgus stress before and after TKA, comparing to clinical results. Materials and Methods. A hundred knees of 88 consecutive patients who had knees of osteoarthritis with varus deformity were investigated in this study. All TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker) were performed using computer assisted navigation system. The kinematic parameters of the soft-tissue balance, and amount of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia were obtained by interpreting kinematics, which display graphs throughout the range of motion (ROM) in the navigation system. Femoro-tibial alignments were recorded under the stress of varus and valgus before the procedure and after implantation of all components. In each ROM (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 degrees), the data of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (tolerability) were analyzed before and after implantation. Furthermore, correlations between tolerability of varus/valgus and clinical improvement revealed by ROM and Knee society score (KSS) were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results. Evaluation of soft tissue balance with navigation system revealed that the tolerance of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (varus/valgus) after implantation was significantly decreased compared with before implantation even in mid-flexion range. There were no significant correlations between tolerability of coronal relative movement and improvement of extension range and KSS. However, mid-flexion tolerability showed negative correlation with flexion range. Discussion. One of the most important principles for ligament balancing in TKA for varus knees is involved that the medial extension gap should be within 1–3mm to avoid flexion contracture and a feeling of instability, the medial flexion gap should be equal or 1–2mm larger to the medial extension gap, and lateral extension laxity up to 5 degrees is acceptable. However, there have been few reports measuring laxity from 30 to 60 degrees. In this study, the tolerance of coronal relative movement was significantly limited even in mid-flexion. However, mid-flexion tightness was not significantly correlated with clinical results except for flexion range. This result might be suggested that high tolerability of coronal relative movement in mid-flexion range may lead to widening of flexion range of motion of the knee after TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3 degrees of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilise both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabiliser of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA