Introduction. The condition of the soft tissues surrounding an ankle fracture influences timing and treatment of injuries. Conventional treatment used an open approach to facilitate anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation. Intramedullary devices for fibular fractures provide a safe alternative in patients in which the condition of the soft tissue envelope or the patient's co-morbidities may benefit from a less invasive approach. We compared outcomes for patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with those undergoing treatment with
Introduction. The primary goal of treatment of an ankle fracture is to obtain a stable anatomic fixation to facilitate early mobilisation and good functional recovery. However, the need for open reduction and internal fixation must be weighed against poor bone quality, compromised soft tissues, patient co-morbidities and potential wound-healing complications. Materials and Methods. We reviewed two matched groups of 18 patients each, who underwent fixation for unstable Weber-B ankle fractures with intramedullary
Techniques for fixation of the lateral malleolus have remained essentially unchanged since the 1960s, but are associated with complication rates of up to 30%. The
Introduction. Fixation of the distal fibula in conjunction with ankle fractures has not changed over the last 50 years. The complication rate of these fixation techniques is as high as 30%. The fibula nail is an alternative method of fixation and uses a minimal invasive technique. This technique preserves soft tissue compared to previous techniques used, and fewer soft tissue complications. Method. We reviewed the preliminary results of 178 patients with unstable Weber B and C ankle fractures that were operated on in our unit between January 2012 and February 2013. We used the Acumed