Aims. COVID-19-related patient care delays have resulted in an unprecedented patient care backlog in the field of orthopaedics. The objective of this study is to examine orthopaedic provider preferences regarding the patient care backlog and
Introduction. Management of complex fractures poses a significant challenge. Evolving research and changes to national guidelines suggest better outcomes are achieved by transfer to specialist centres. The development of Major Trauma Networks was accompanied by relevant
BACKGROUND. Theatre-listed trauma patients routinely require two ‘group and save’ blood-bank samples, in case they need perioperative transfusion. The Welsh Blood Service (WBS) need patients to have one recorded sample from any time in the last 10 years. A second sample, to permit cross-matching and blood issuing, must be within 7 days of transfusion (or within 48 hours if the patient is pregnant, or has been transfused within the last 3 months). The approximate cost of processing a sample is £15.00. AIM. To investigate whether routine pretransfusion blood sampling for trauma admissions exceeds requirements. METHODS. Electronic records were used to collect pretransfusion sampling data for all adult non-elective trauma patients listed for theatre under a trauma and orthopaedics consultant between 1/1/2023-31/1/2023. Data were collected on unnecessary samples, rejected samples and total excess samples. RESULTS. 113 patients (mean age[±SD] 64.09[±19.96]) underwent 132 procedures. On average, unnecessary sampling occurred at a rate of 0.48 samples per operation, equating to a cost of £945.00/month. Samples were rejected by the laboratory at a rate of 0.25 samples per operation. Common reasons for rejection were ‘patient date of birth discrepancy’ (between sample and request form), ‘patient address discrepancy’ and ‘signature discrepancy’. Overall, total excessive sampling occurred at a rate of 0.60 samples per operation. CONCLUSION. Nearly half of trauma patients undergo unnecessary blood testing in anticipation of potential perioperative transfusion. This has implications for sustainability,
Introduction. The number of revision hip arthroplasty procedures is rising annually with 7852 such operations performed in the UK in 2010. These are expensive procedures due to pre-operative investigation, surgical implants and instrumentation, protracted hospital stay, and pharmacological costs. There is a paucity of robust literature on the costs associated with the common indications for this surgery. Objective. We aim to quantify the cost of revision hip arthroplasty by indication and identify any short-fall in relation to the national tariff. Methods. Clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 305 consecutive revision total hip replacements in 286 patients performed at a tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2008. These operations were categorised by indication into: aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection and peri-prosthetic fracture. Clinical data included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, prosthesis and instrumentation required.
In the current austere
We present a case series of patients who underwent 3 or 4 part proximal humerus fracture fixation using an intra-osseous suture technique. 18 patients are included in the study with follow up data obtained ranging from 1 to 4 years. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and range of movement measurements were taken for all patients. The mean OSS for the group was 50/60 with a mean forward flexion of 140°, abduction of 132°, external rotation of 48° and internal rotation to the level 10. th. thoracic vertebra. Three patients developed adhesive capsulitis, 2 requiring subsequent arthroscopic release. This data compares favourably to outcomes reported in the literature with hemiarthroplasty or locking plate fixation. An activity based costing analysis estimated that the treatment costs for proximal humerus fractures was approximately £2,055 when performing a soft tissue reconstruction, £3,114 when using a locking plate and £4,679 when performing a hemiarthroplasty. This demonstrates a significant
Introduction. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is projected to be the most common elective surgical procedure in the coming decades, however TJA now accounts for the largest expenditure per procedure for Medicare and Medicaid provided interventions. This is coupled with increasing complexity of surgical care and concerns about patient satisfaction. The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) model has been proposed as a method to both improve patient care and reduce costs. The PSH model provides evidence-based protocols and pathways from the time of surgical decision to after postoperative discharge. PSH pathways can further be standardized with integration into electronic medical records (EMRs). The purpose of this study is to see if the implementation of PSH with and without EMR integration effects patient outcomes and cost. Methods. A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent elective primary total joint arthroplasty at our institution from January 1, 2012 to April 1, 2018. Three cohorts were compared. The first cohort included patients before the implementation of the PSH model (January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2014). The second cohort included patients in the PSH model without EMR integration (January 1, 2015 – August 1, 2016). The third cohort included patients in the PSH model with EMR integration (August 1, 2016 - April 1, 2018). The clinical outcome criteria measured were average hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and discharge disposition.
This study aimed to determine if the adoption of collagenase treatment is economically viable. Xiapex collagenase was trialled at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust in 50 patients suitable for fasciectomy, with a palpable cord and up to two affected joints. Retrospective data for contracture angle pre-injection, immediately post-manipulation and at an average 6 weeks (range 2–17) clinic follow up was collected from medical notes. At follow up the post-procedure number of days required for return to activities of daily living (ADLs) and/or work were recorded, along with overall patient satisfaction rating. Complete data was obtained for 43 patients of average age 67 (range 45–82). At follow up 88% had ≤ 20° residual contracture. Average days return to full ADLs was 9 and work was 11. Overall satisfaction was 8.6 out of 10. Xiapex patients required an average 1 hand physiotherapy appointment post-manipulation compared to 6 for fasciectomy, saving £172.20. Total cost for one treatment course, excluding physiotherapy, was £1166 for Xiapex compared to £2801 for palmar fasciectomy and £5352 for digital fasciectomy. The level of contracture after one Xiapex treatment course permitted return of hand function in the majority of patients whose overall treatment course required less
The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors,
Infective complications following implant related orthopaedic surgery or fracture related infection are associated with high costs and increased length of stay (LOS). However, the economic burden of disease before, during and after definitive osteomyelitis surgery is not well quantified. The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database captures all admissions, outpatient appointments and emergency department attendances at NHS hospitals in England. We identified all patients with a diagnostic code of osteomyelitis and quantified the tariff costs associated with the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. We also collected all recorded healthcare events related to osteomyelitis for two years preceding the initial osteomyelitis treatment procedure, as well as for two years after the procedure. We compared average osteomyelitis treatment costs in England against a dedicated specialist multidisciplinary bone infection centre. We interrogated the HES database for all patients given a diagnostic code of osteomyelitis (M86) between April 2013 and January 2017. We excluded all cases with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis and an index procedure of an amputation for diabetes or arterial disease. Of the remaining 104,622 patients there were 24,408 cases who had their index procedure for osteomyelitis in this time period. Of these we compared a subset of 575 cases treated in a specialist bone infection centre.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of human recombinant osteogenic protein 1 (rhBMP-7) for the treatment of fracture non-unions and to estimate the health economics aspect of its administration. Twenty-four patients (18 males, mean age 39.1 (range 18-79)) with 25 fracture non-unions were treated with rhBMP-7 in our institution (mean follow-up 15.4 months (range 6-29)). Successful completion of treatment was defined as the achievement of both clinical and radiological union. The cost of each treatment episode was estimated including hospital stay, theatre time, orthopaedic implants, drug administration, investigations, clinic attendances, and physiotherapy treatments. The total cost of all episodes up to the point of receiving BMP-7 and similarly following treatment with BMP-7 were estimated and analysed. Of the 25 cases, 21 were atrophic (3 associated with bone loss) and 4 were infected non-unions. The mean number of operations performed prior to rhBMP-7 application was 3.4, including autologous bone graft in 9 cases and bone marrow injection in one case. In 21 out of the 25 cases (84%), both clinical and radiological union occurred. Mean hospital stay before and after receiving rhBMP-7 was 26.84 days per fracture and 7.8 days per fracture respectively. Total cost of treatments prior to BMP-7 was £346,117 [£13,844.68 per fracture]. Costs incurred following BMP-7 administration were estimated as £183,460 [£7,338.4 per fracture]. rhBMP-7 was used as a bone stimulating agent with or without conventional bone grafting with a success rate of 84% in this series of patients with persistent fracture non-unions. The average cost of its application was £7,338 [53.0% of the total costs of previous unsuccessful treatment of non –unions, p<0.05). Treating non-union is costly, but the
Government figures show a trend of increasing incidence in motorcycle trauma in the UK over the last decade. These patients often have multiple injuries and place a significant burden on the admitting units. In the face of changes to health service funding, with the introduction of Payment by Results, we wanted to determine the true cost of treating these patients in the setting of a District General Hospital. We undertook a retrospective case-note review of all the motorcyclists involved in road traffic accidents (MRTAs) requiring admission for treatment in 2004. Patients were identified using the hospital computer system. A supplementary telephone survey was also undertaken to retrieve information not previously recorded. The following parameters were analysed: demographic and admission details, motorcycle and accident details, admitting specialty, injury pattern, nature and number of investigations, treatment, outcome and cost.Introduction
Methods
Total knee and hip arthroplasty is a commonly performed surgical procedure. As the population ages the numbers of these procedures are predicted to increase. Maximizing patient outcomes and decreasing healthcare delivery costs will be essential to creating a higher value U.S. healthcare system. The purpose of our study was to analyze the effect of a multidisciplinary preoperative education program (Joint Academy) on various outcomes that effect overall cost of primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A retrospective review of 904 patients' charts that underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty from October 1, 2010 to September 31, 2011 at a single institution was performed. We then compared 102 patients who did not have preoperative education to 802 patients who did have preoperative education through the Joint Academy (JA). We looked at patient length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and internal hospital cost. Linear regression was performed on all data to look for statistical significance.Purpose:
Methods:
Complications following hip and knee arthroplasty can occur in any given patient. However, specific risk factors such as increased age, history of coexistent disease, and increased body mass index have been found to increase the risk of complications after such procedures. Complications often require prolonged hospital admission periods and added hospital resources which ultimately results in increased costs per hospital stay. However, if patients are pre-operatively risk stratified, and followed post-operatively for specific high risk medical issues, many complications may be avoided. By using a hospital standardised peri-operative risk stratification process, the cost per hospital stay for hip and knee arthroplasty may decrease. Overall hospital costs related to joint arthroplasty will be decreased by using a multi-disciplinary peri-operative risk stratification programme.Background:
Hypothesis:
Revision surgery for total knee replacement is a complex procedure, carrying an increased risk for the patient and cost for hospitals. As well as increased cost of peri-operative investigations, blood transfusions, surgical instrumentation, implants and theatre time, there is a well documented increased length of stay (LOS), accounting for the majority of actual costs associated with surgery. We compared revision surgery for infection vs. other causes (aseptic loosening, dislocation, mal-alignment). Clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 180 consecutive revision total knee replacements performed at a tertiary referral centre between 2003 and 2012. Actual costs and National Health Service tariffs were compared per patient and mean difference calculated. Mean age was 66 years (range 17–87) with 62 male and 117 female patients. Mean LOS for aseptic cases was 10 days (range 1–62) and 20 days (range 4–103) for infection. Mean cost difference in aseptic cases (n = 125) was £−933 (SD = £12,204), and £−3907 (SD = £7,256) for infection (n = 54). Surgery for infection was associated with increased operating times, blood loss and complications compared to revision for aseptic causes. LOS for infection was on average double that for aseptic cases (p < 0.05). Current NHS tariffs do not fully reimburse the increased costs associated with providing a revision knee surgery service, with even greater cost incurred by the treating hospital for infected cases. These losses may negatively influence the provision of revision surgery in the NHS.
Elective Orthopaedics has been targeted by the UK Department of Health as a maximum six-month waiting time for operations could not be met. The National Orthopaedic Project was initiated as a consequence and Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) and well established private hospitals were utilised to treat NHS long wait patients. We audited the primary total hip replacements performed in our hospital in 1998 and 2003 to compare the differences in the patient characteristics in particular age, length of stay and ASA grade.Introduction
Materials and methods
We test the clinical validity and
Aim. The number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is increasing due to ageing population and increasing numbers of arthroplasty procedures and treatment is costly. Aim of the study was to analyze the direct healthcare costs of PJI in Europe for total hip arthroplasties (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). Method. A systematic review in PubMed with search of direct costs of PJI in European countries was performed. Thereby the term cost* AND (infection OR PJI) AND (prosthesis OR knee OR hip OR “TKA” OR “THA” OR arthroplast*) was combined with each European country to detect relevant publications. Publications with definition of performed procedure and joint localization were included into further analysis. The mean value of direct healthcare cost was calculated for the respective joint and the respective operation performed. Results. Screening revealed 1,274 eligible publications. After review of abstracts and full-texts n=11 manuscripts were included into final analysis (Figure 1). The mean combined direct hospital costs for revision for PJI after TKA and THA was 26,311€. Mean costs for revision procedures for PJI after TKA were 24,617€. Direct costs for TKA-PJI treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) were on average 10,121€. For two-stage revisions in knee arthroplasties total average costs were 30,829€. Referring to revision surgery for PJI in THA, the mean hospital costs in Europe were 28,005€. For a DAIR procedure direct healthcare costs of 5,528€ were identified. Two-stage revision cost on average 31,217€. Conclusions. PJIs are associated with significant direct healthcare costs. The
Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy is the third most common Orthopaedic surgery performed after TKA and THA, comprising up to 16.6% of all procedures. The efficiency of Orthopaedic care delivery with respect to waiting times and systemic costs is extremely concerning. Canadian Orthopaedic patients experience the longest wait times of any G7 country, yet perioperative surgical care constitutes a significant portion of a hospital's budget. In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA) is an emerging technology that has been primarily studied as a diagnostic tool. Recent evidence shows that it is a cost-effective alternative to hospital- and community-based MRI with comparable accuracy. Recent procedure guides detailing IONA medial meniscectomy suggest a potential node for OR diversion. Given the high case volume of knee arthroscopy as well as the potential amenability to be diverted away from the OR to the office setting, IONA has the potential to generate considerable improvements in healthcare system efficiency with respect to throughput and cost savings. As such, the purpose of this study is to investigate the cost savings and impact on waiting times on a mid-sized Canadian community hospital if IONA is offered as an alternative to traditional operating room (OR) arthroscopy for medial meniscal tears. In order to develop a comprehensive understanding and accurate representation of the quantifiable operations involved in the current state for medial meniscus tear care, process mapping was performed that describes the journey of a patient from when they present with knee pain to their general practitioner until case resolution. This technique was then repeated to create a second process map describing the hypothetical proposed state whereby OR diversion may be conducted utilizing IONA. Once the respective process maps for each state were determined, each process map was translated into a Dupont decision tree. In order to accurately determine the total number of patients which would be eligible for this care pathway at our institution, the OR booking scheduling for arthroscopy and meniscectomy/repair over a four year time period (2016-2020) were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effect of the number of patients who select IONA over meniscectomy and the number of revision meniscectomies after IONA on 1) the profit and profit margin determined by the MCS-Dupont
