Introduction. The evaluation of treatment modalities for distal femur periprosthetic fractures (DFPF) post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has predominantly focused on functional and radiological outcomes in existing literature. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the functional and radiological efficacy of locking plate (LP) and retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN) treatments, while incorporating mortality rates. Method. Twenty patients (15 female, 5 male) with a minimum 24-month follow-up period, experiencing Lewis-Rorabeck type-2 DFPF after TKA were included. These patients underwent either LP (n=10) or IMN (n=10). The average follow-up duration was 48 months (range: 24–192). Treatment outcomes, including functional scores, alignment, union time, complications, and mortality rates, were assessed and compared between LP and IMN groups. Clinical examination findings pre-treatment and at final follow-up, along with two-way plain radiographs, were utilized. Statistical analyses comprised Student's t-test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with a 95% confidence interval. Result. At final follow-up, the LP group demonstrated a mean Knee Society score of 67.2 ± 16.1, while the IMN group exhibited a score of 72.8 ± 9.4(P = 0.58). No statistically significant differences were observed in alignment between the groups[aLDFA (anatomical lateral distal femoral angle), P = 0.31; aPDFA (anatomical posterior distal femoral angle), P = 0.73]. The mean time to union was 3.7 ± 0.8 months for LP and 3.9 ± 0.6 months for IMN (P = 0.62). Complications such as infection occurred in 1 LP patient, and non-union was observed in 2 LP patients, while no complications were noted in IMN group(P < 0.01). Mortality rates were notably lower in the IMN group compared to the LP group across various time intervals. Conclusion. Both LP and IMN treatments yielded similar functional scores, alignment, and union time for DFPF post-TKA. However, the lower incidence of complications and mortality rates associated with IMN treatment suggest its superiority in managing DFPF following TKA

Knee alignment is a fundamental measurement in the assessment, monitoring and surgical management of patients with OA. In spite of extensive research into the consequences of malalignment, there is a lack of data regarding the potential variation between supine and standing (functional) conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore this relationship in asymptomatic, osteoarthritic and prosthetic knees. Our hypothesis was that the change in alignment of these three groups would be different. Infrared position capture was used to assess knee alignment for 30 asymptomatic controls and 31 patients with OA, before and after TKA. Coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles in extension (negative values varus/hyperextension) were measured supine and in bi-pedal stance and changes analysed using a paired t-test. To quantify this change in 3D, vector plots of ankle centre displacement relative to the knee centre were produced. Alignment in both planes changed significantly from supine to standing for all three groups, most frequently towards relative varus and extension. In the coronal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was 0.1±2.5/−1.1±3.7 for asymptomatic (p=0.001), −2.5±5.7/−3.6±6.0 for osteoarthritic (p=0.009) and −0.7±1.4/ −2.5±2.0 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). In the sagittal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was −1.7±3.3/−5.5±4.9 for asymptomatic (p<0.001), 7.7±7.1/1.8±7.7 for osteoarthritic (p<0.001) and 6.8±5.1/1.4±7.6 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). The vector plots showed that the trend of relative varus and extension in stance was similar in overall magnitude and direction between the groups. The similarities between each group did not support our hypothesis. The consistent kinematic pattern for different knee types suggests that soft tissue restraints rather than underlying joint deformity may be more influential in dynamic control of alignment from lying to standing. This potential change should be considered when positioning TKA components on supine limbs as post-operative functional alignment may be different