There has been a significant increase in waiting times for elective surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As per the hospital policy, patients awaiting elective surgery for more than 52 weeks were offered a consultant-led harm review. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the impact of this service on the field of foot and ankle surgery. The data from harm review clinics at a District General Hospital related to patients waiting to undergo elective foot and ankle procedures in the year 2021 (wait time of more than 52 weeks) were assessed. Clinical data points like change in diagnosis, need for further investigations, and patients being taken off the waiting list were reviewed. The effect of the waiting time on patients’ mental health and their perception of the service was assessed as well. A total of 72 patients awaiting foot and ankle procedures for more than 52 weeks were assessed as a part of the harm review service. It was noted that 25% of patients found that their symptoms had worsened while 66.1% perceived them to be unchanged. Twelve patients (16.9%) were sent for updated investigations. Twenty-one patients (29.5%) were taken off the waiting lists for various reasons with the most common one being other pressing health concerns; 9% of patients affirmed that the wait for surgery had a significant negative impact on their mental health. This study concludes that the harm review service is a useful programme as it helps guide changes in the diagnosis and clinical picture. The service is found to be valuable by most patients, and its impact on the service specialities and multiple centres could be further assessed to draw broad conclusions

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring. NNH is the number of cases needed to treat in order to have one adverse outcome. A systemic review was undertaken to calculate relative risks, risk difference and number needed to harm following management of supracon-dylar fractures with cross or lateral K wires. It was found that there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires. The aim of this study was to calculate the number of cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus that would need to be performed for one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury to occur. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus. To date there are no clinical trials showing the benefit of cross K wiring over lateral K wiring in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If it can be confirmed that lateral K wiring is as effective as crossed K wiring, iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury can be avoided. A systematic review of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries following management of supracondylar fractures was conducted. The databases MEDLINE 1966 – present, EMBASE 1980 – present, CINAHL 1982 – present, CDSR, and DARE were searched along with a meticulous search of the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics from 1998 to 2004. Of the two hundred and forty-eight papers identified, only thirty-six met the inclusion criteria. The papers where both lateral crossed K wires were used as treatment were identified for calculating relative rates, risk difference and number needed to harm. NNH was 7.69. When a sensitivity analysis removing two studies that had five subjects or fewer and a 100% ulnar nerve injury rate was peformed, the NNH was 27.7. In other words, there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires

Purpose: This study attempted to determine if the form of feedback provided by a computer-based navigation technique improves the learning of the placement of cannulated screws across a femoral neck fracture in the surgical trainee. Method: A prospective, randomized, appropriately powered, and controlled study involving 39 surgical trainees (first-year residents and fourth-year medical students) with no prior experience in surgically managing femoral neck fractures were used in the study. After a training session, participants underwent a pretest by performing the surgical task on a simulated hip fracture using fluoroscopic guidance. Immediately after, 20 participants were randomized into undergoing a training session using a conventional fluoroscopy-guided technique while the other participants were randomized into undergoing a training session using a computer-based navigation technique. Immediate post-tests and retention tests (4 weeks later) were performed. A transfer test was used to assess the impact of the type of training on surgical performance – after performing the retention test, each group repeated the task but used the other technique to guide them (i.e. those trained with fluors-copy used computer navigation and vice versa). Results: Screw placement was equal and to the level of an expert surgeon with either training technique during the post-, retention, and transfer tests. Participants that were trained with computer navigation took fewer attempts to position hardware and used less fluoroscopy time than those that trained with fluoroscopy. When participants that trained with computer navigation reverted to conventional fluoroscopic technique at the transfer test, more fluoroscopy time and dosage was used. Participants that trained with fluoroscopy used less fluoroscopy time and took fewer attempts to position hardware when they subsequently used computer navigation to perform the task during the transfer test. Conclusion: Computer navigation does not harm the learning of surgical novices in this basic orthopaedic surgical skill. Training with computer navigation minimizes radiation exposure and decreases the number of attempts to perform the task. No compromise in learning occurs if a surgical novice trains with one type of technology and transfers to using the other

Attempts to eliminate congenital dislocation of the hip by detecting it early have not been completely successful. It is not known why some infants, checked by competent examiners, still appear late with dislocations. The usual explanations of a mistake by the examiner, or of spontaneous dislocation of a hip that was stable at birth, do not explain why some centres succeed while others fail, or why good examiners may become less effective with experience. The explanation suggested is that the examination itself could be responsible and may actually cause a hip to become unstable.

We summarise and highlight the safety concerns within the field of trauma and orthopaedic surgery with particular emphasis placed on current controversies and reforms within the United Kingdom National Health Service.

Introduction

Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring allows for assessment of the spinal cord and susceptible structures during complex spinal surgery. It is well validated for the detection of potential neurological injury but little is known of surgeon's responses to an abnormal trace and its effect on neurological outcome. We aimed to investigate this in spinal deformity patients who are particularly vulnerable during their corrective surgery.

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a subject of considerable debate. A recent study questioned the need for tourniquets based on associated risks. However, the study omitted analysis of crucial tourniquet-related parameters which have been demonstrated in numerous studies to be associated with safe tourniquet use and reduction of adverse events. The current utilization and preferences of tourniquet use in Canada remain unknown. Our primary aim was to determine the current practices, patterns of use, and opinions of tourniquet use in TKA among members of the Canadian Arthroplasty Society (CAS). Additionally, we sought to determine the need for updated best practice guidelines to inform optimal tourniquet use and to identify areas requiring further research. A self-administered survey was emailed to members of the CAS in October 2021(six-week period). The response rate was 57% (91/161). Skip logic branching was used to administer a maximum of 59 questions related to tourniquet use, beliefs, and practices. All respondents were staff surgeons and 88% were arthroplasty fellowship trained. Sixty-five percent have been in practice for ≥11 years and only 16% for 50 TKA/year, 59% have an academic practice, and >67% prefer cemented TKA. Sixty-six percent currently use tourniquets, 25% no longer do but previously did, and 9% never used tourniquets. For those not using tourniquets, the most common reasons are potential harm/risks and publications/conferences. Among current users, 48% use in all cases and an additional 37% use in 76-99% of cases. The top reason for use was improved visualization/bloodless field (88%), followed by performing a cemented TKA, used in training, and faster operative times. The main patient factor influencing selective tourniquet use was peripheral vascular disease and main surgical factors were operative duration and cementless TKA. The most frequent adverse events reported were bruising/pinching under the tourniquet and short-term pain, which majority believed were related to improper tourniquet use (prolonged time, high-pressures, poor cuff fit), yet only 8% use contoured tourniquets and 32% don't use limb protection. Despite substantial evidence in literature that tourniquet safety and probability of harm are affected by tourniquet time and pressure, only 83% and 72% of respondents believe reducing tourniquet time and pressure respectively reduce the probability of harm. In addition, no surgeon utilizes personalized limb occlusion pressure which has been demonstrated to substantially reduce tourniquet pressure while being safe and effective. Furthermore, 62% always use fixed pressure and 37% will modify the pressure based on patient parameters, most often systolic blood pressure and limb size. Almost all (88%) were interested in new evidence-based guidelines regarding these parameters. Tourniquet use in TKA remains prevalent among arthroplasty surgeons in the CAS; however tremendous practice variability regarding several key parameters required for optimal use exists. Current best practices of tourniquet use regarding personalized pressures, time, and type are not being utilized across Canada. There is considerable interest and need for further research and updated guidelines regarding key parameters of safe tourniquet usage to optimize tourniquet use in TKA

There have been no studies assessing the acceptability of opioid tapering in the pre-arthroplasty setting. This qualitative study aimed to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to opioid tapering amongst patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and (2) explore the similarities and differences in acceptability of opioid tapering between pre-arthroplasty patients and those participating in a biopsychosocial pain management program. From January 2021, adult participants diagnosed with CNCP and taking opioids daily (any dose at time of screening for a period of 3 months) were recruited from either Fairfield Orthopaedic Hip and Knee Service (FOHKS) or Liverpool Hospital Pain Clinic (LHPC). Semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis using the framework method. 17 participants were recruited (FOHKS, n=9, mean age 67, female 77%, LHPC, n=8, mean age 54, female 63%). Both groups had participants who; (i) were reluctant to use opioid medications and used them out of “necessity”, (ii) were reluctant to taper due to concerns of worsening pain, quality of life, (iii) believed opioids were “toxins” causing bodily harm. Some FOHKS participants believed tapering should be a post-operative focus, whilst others believed tapering opioids pre-operatively will assist in post-op pain management. Few LHPC participants felt dependent/addicted to opioids, thus driving their intention to taper opioids. The belief of tapering opioids causing worse pain was based on either previous experiences or concerns alone. Some FOHKS participants were more inclined to taper opioids if they were educated on the chronic and peri-operative risks associated with using opioids at time of arthroplasty. Opioid users recognise the harms associated with chronic opioid use and believe they are used out of desperation for adequate analgesia, function, and quality of life. Tapering opioids in the pre-arthroplasty context may need coupling with patient education highlighting the importance of opioid tapering pre-operatively

Aims. Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and trial registries up to 26 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: pain, function, serious adverse events (SAEs), blood loss, implant stability, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Results. We included 41 RCTs with 2,819 participants. SAEs were significantly more common in the tourniquet group (53/901 vs 26/898, tourniquet vs no tourniquet respectively) (risk ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.73). The mean pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.25 points higher (95% CI 0.32 to 2.19) in the tourniquet group. Overall blood loss did not differ between groups (mean difference 8.61 ml; 95% CI -83.76 to 100.97). The mean length of hospital stay was 0.34 days longer in the group that had surgery with a tourniquet (95% CI 0.03 to 0.64) and the mean duration of surgery was 3.7 minutes shorter (95% CI -5.53 to -1.87). Conclusion. TKA with a tourniquet is associated with an increased risk of SAEs, pain, and a marginally longer hospital stay. The only finding in favour of tourniquet use was a shorter time in theatre. The results make it difficult to justify the routine use of a tourniquet in TKA surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):830–839

The use of tourniquets in lower limb trauma surgery to control bleeding and improve the surgical field is a long established practice. In this article, we review the evidence relating to harms and benefits of tourniquet use in lower limb fracture fixation surgery and report the results of a survey on current tourniquet practice among trauma surgeons in the UK

Aims. This study aimed to compare mortality in trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with secondary endpoints at 0 to 1, 2 to 7, 8 to 30, 90, and 365 days. Methods. We analyzed data from 26,393 patients with trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures treated with IMNs (n = 9,095) or SHSs (n = 17,298) in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (January 2008 to December 2020). Exclusions were made for patients aged < 60 years, pathological fractures, pre-2008 operations, contralateral hip fractures, fractures other than trochanteric A1/A2, and treatments other than IMNs or SHSs. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses adjusted for type of fracture, age, sex, cognitive impairment, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and time period were conducted, along with calculations for number needed to harm (NNH). Results. In unadjusted analyses, there was no significant difference between IMN and SHS patient survival at 30 days (91.8% vs 91.1%; p = 0.083) or 90 days (85.4% vs 84.5%; p = 0.065), but higher one-year survival for IMNs (74.5% vs 73.3%; p = 0.031) compared with SHSs. After adjustments, no significant difference in 30-day mortality was found (hazard rate ratio (HRR) 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.02(; p = 0.146). IMNs exhibited higher mortality at 0 to 1 days (HRR 1.63 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.34); p = 0.009) compared with SHSs, with a NNH of 556, but lower mortality at 8 to 30 days (HRR 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00); p = 0.043). No differences were observed in mortality at 2 to 7 days (HRR 0.94 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.11); p = 0.434), 90 days (HRR 0.95 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.02); p = 0.177), or 365 days (HRR 0.97 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.02); p = 0.192). Conclusion. This study found no difference in 30-day mortality between IMNs and SHSs. However, IMNs were associated with a higher mortality at 0 to 1 days and a marginally lower mortality at 8 to 30 days compared with SHSs. The observed differences in mortality were small and should probably not guide choice of treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):603–612

In healthy subjects, respiratory maximal volumes are highly dependent on the sagittal range of motion of the T7-T10 segment. In AIS, the abolition of T7-T10 dynamics related to the stiffness induced by the apex region in Lenke IA curves could harm ventilation during maximal breathing. The aim of this study was to analyze the dynamics of the thoracic spine during deep breathing in AIS patients and in healthy matched controls. This is a cross-sectional, case-control study. 20 AIS patients (18 girls, Cobb angle, 54.7±7.9°; Risser 1.35±1.2) and 15 healthy volunteers (11 girls) matched in age (12.5 versus 15.8 yr. mean age) were included. In AIS curves, the apex was located at T8 (14) and T9 (6). Conventional sagittal radiographs of the whole spine were performed at maximal inspiration and exhalation. The ROM of each spinal thoracic functional segment (T1-T7, T7-T10, T10-T12) and the global T1-T12 ROM were measured. In healthy subjects, the mean T1-T12 ROM during forced breathing was 16.7±3.8. AIS patients showed a T1-T12 ROM of 1.1±1.5 (p<0.05), indicating a sagittal stiffness of the thoracic spine. A wide T7-T10 ROM (15.3±3.0) was found in healthy controls (91.6% of the T1–T12 ROM). AIS patients showed only 0.4±1.4 ROM at T7-T10 (36.4% of the T1-T12 ROM) (p<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the magnitude of T7-T10 kyphosis in maximal exhalation and both FVC (% of predicted FVC) and FEV1. In conclusion, Lenke 1A AIS patients show a restriction of the thoracic spine motion with an almost complete abolition of T7-T10 ROM, a crucial segment for deep breathing. T7-T10 stiffness could explain the ventilatory limitations found in AIS patients

Introduction. Open fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity. These injuries are associated with harm to both physical and emotional health as well as preclusion of work, social, and leisure activities. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health related quality of life are critical indicators of successful rehabilitation following open fracture treatment. This study aimed to measure the PROMs for patients with open lower limb fractures and investigate the relationship with injury severity. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single major trauma centre in the UK. All adult patients with an open lower limb fracture were eligible for inclusion. Patients were identified through a search of a local Open Fracture Database. Epidemiological, clinical, and fracture classification data were obtained by reviewing case notes. Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) and EQ5-D were used as PROMs and measured by a postal questionnaire, alongside return to employment data. Results. A total of 73 patients responded to the questionnaire. Median LEFS was 42 (IQR 26.5 – 59.5), and median EQ5-D was 0.69 (IQR 0.48 – 0.89). There was no significant association between open fracture classification and PROMs. Over 40% of patients reported a change in employment due to their injury. Those who changed jobs had a statistically significant reduction in the EQ5-D of 0.12 (p = 0.021); no significant difference existed in LEFS. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the devastating functional impact of open fractures. This cohort of open injuries reported lower functional and quality-of-life measures compared to population norms. Injury classification was not a valuable predictor of PROMs. A substantial proportion of patients were forced to change employment due to their injury, and these patients reported a significantly lower quality of life. Further work is required to understand the factors contributing to open fracture PROMs

Ceramic bearing fractures are rare events, but mandate revision and implantation of new bearings. Revisions using metal heads have been reported to lead to gross volumetric head wear (due to abrasive retained ceramic micro-debris), cobalt toxicity, multi-organ failure and death. Such complications are widely published (50+ reports), yet we know that patients continue to be put at risk. Using data from the NJR and AOANJRR, this study seeks to compare the risk of re-revision and death by revision bearing combination following a ceramic bearing fracture. Data were extracted from the NJR and AOANJRR, identifying revisions for ceramic bearing fracture. Subsequent outcomes of survival, re-revision and death were compared between revision bearing combinations (ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-polyethylene, and metal-on-polyethylene). 366 cases were available for analysis from the NJR dataset (MoP=34, CoP=112, CoC=221) and 174 from the AOANJRR dataset (MoP=17, CoP=44, CoC=113). The overall incidence rate of adverse outcome (revision or death) was 0.65 for metal heads and 0.23 for ceramic head articulations (p=0.0012) across the whole time period (NJR). Kaplan-Meir survival estimates demonstrate an increased risk of both re-revision and death where a metal head has been used vs a ceramic head following revision for ceramic fracture. There are few decisions in arthroplasty surgery that can lead to serious harm or death for our patients, but revision using a metal head following ceramic bearing fracture is one of them. This study enhances the signal of what is already known but previously only reported as inherently low-level evidence (case reports and small series) due to event rarity. Use of a metal head in revision for ceramic fracture represents an avoidable patient safety issue, which revision guidelines should seek to address

Preoperative anaemia and intraoperative blood loss result in ∼90% of individuals being anaemic following hip and knee arthroplasty. Reducing blood loss offers the opportunity to improve outcomes and reduce the risk of transfusion and costs. This review's aim was to determine the effectiveness of drugs for preventing blood loss, and identify optimal dose, route, and timing of administration. Cochrane network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted. Inclusion criteria: adults undergoing primary or revision elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Drugs studied: tranexamic acid (TXA), aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, desmopressin, factor VIIa and XIII, fibrinogen, fibrin sealants, and non-fibrin sealants. Primary outcomes: need for allogenic blood transfusion, all• cause mortality (within 30 days). Secondary outcomes: mean number of transfusion episodes, re-operation, length of hospital stay and adverse events (DVT, PE, CVA, MI). 102 studies with 8418 participants. Trials included more women (63%). 47 studies (4398 participants) were included within the blood transfusion NMA. TXA given intra-articularly and orally at a total dose of greater than 3g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively ranked the highest, with anticipated absolute effect of 147 fewer transfusions per 1000 (53% chance ranking 1st) (relative risk(RR) 0.02, 95% credible interval(CrI) 0–0.31); moderate-certainty). Aprotinin (RR 0.59, 95%:CrI 0.36–0.86; low certainty evidence), fibrin (RR 0.86, CrI 0.25–2.93; very-low certainty) and EACA (RR 0.60, 95%:CrI 0.29–1.27; very-low certainty) were not shown to be as effective as TXA. TXA was the most effective drug for preventing bleeding in lower limb arthroplasty. Aprotinin and EACA were not as effective. Currently, the optimal dose, route and timing of administration of TXA is unclear. However, TXA given at higher doses and via mixed routes ranked higher in the treatment hierarchy. Oral TXA may be as effective as intavenous. There was no evidence of harm associated with higher doses of TXA

Superior team performance in surgery leads to fewer technical errors, reduced mortality, and improved patient outcomes. Scrub nurses are a pivotal part of this team, however they have very little structured training, leading to high levels of stress, low confidence, inefficiency, and potential for harm. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) simulation has demonstrated excellent efficacy in training surgeons. We tested the efficacy of an iVR curriculum for training scrub nurses in performing their role in an anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (AA-THA). Sixty nursing students were included in this study and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to learning the scrub nurse role for an AA-THA using either conventional training or iVR. The training was derived through expert consensus with senior surgeons, scrub nurses and industry reps. Conventional training consisted of a 1-hour seminar and 2 hours of e-learning where participants were taught the equipment and sequence of steps. The iVR training involved 3 separate hour-long sessions where participants performed the scrub nurse role with an avatar surgeon in a virtual operation. The primary outcome was their performance in a physical world practical objective assessment with real equipment. Data were confirmed parametric using the Shapiro-Wilk test and means compared using the independent samples student's t-test. 53 participants successfully completed the study (26 iVR, 27 conventional) with a mean age of 31±9 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or baseline knowledge test scores between the two groups (p>0.05). The iVR group significantly outperformed the conventionally trained group in the real-world assessment, scoring 66.9±17.9% vs 41.3±16.7%, p<0.0001. iVR is an easily accessible, low cost training modality which could be integrated into scrub nursing curricula to address the current shortfall in training. Prolonged operating times are strongly associated with an increased risk of developing serious complications. By upskilling scrub nurses, operations may proceed more efficiently which in turn may improve patient safety

Lisfranc injuries account for 0.2% of all fractures and have been linked to poorer functional outcomes, in particular resulting in post-traumatic arthritis, midfoot collapse and chronic pain. This study assesses the longitudinal functional outcomes in patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries treated both operatively and non-operatively. Patients above 16 years with Lisfranc injuries from January 2008 and December 2017 were identified through the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes (VOTOR) registry. Follow-up performed at 6, 12 and 24 months through telephone interviews with response rate of 86.1%, 84.2% and 76.2% respectively. Longitudinal functional outcome data using Global Outcome Assessment, EQ-5D-5L, numerical pain scale, Short-Form 12, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and return to work status were collected. Univariate analysis was performed and variables showing a significant difference between groups (p < 0.25) were analysed with multivariable mixed effects regression model. 745 patients included in this retrospective cohort study. At 24 months, both the operative and non-operative groups demonstrated similar functional outcomes trending towards an improvement. Mixed effect regression models for the EQ items for mobility (OR 1.80, CI 0.91 – 3.57), self-care (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.09-3.49), usual activities (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.03), pain (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.89), anxiety (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.34) and pain scale (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.51 – 2.22) and return to work (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.56-2.91) between groups were very similar and not statistically significantly different. We concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between operative and non-operative patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries. Current clinical practices in Lisfranc injury management are appropriate and not inadvertently causing any further harm to patients. Future research comparing fracture patterns, fixation types and corresponding functional outcomes can help determine gold standard Lisfranc injury management

Introduction. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with progressive neurological deterioration. Surgical decompression can halt but not reverse this progression. The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment (MJOA) tool is recommended by international guidelines to grade disease severity into mild, moderate and severe, where moderate and severe are both recommended to undergo surgical intervention. During Covid-19 Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, identified DCM patients as high risk for sustaining permanent neurological damage due to surgical delay. The Advanced Spinal Practitioner (ASP) team implemented a surveillance project to evaluate those at risk. Methods. A spreadsheet was compiled of all DCM patients known to the service. Patients were telephoned (Oct-Nov 2021) by an ASP. MJOA score was recorded and those describing progressive deterioration were reviewed by the ASP team on a spinal same day emergency assessment unit. Incident forms were completed for clinical deterioration and recorded as severe harm. Acute, progressive neurological deterioration was fast tracked for emergency surgical decompression. Results. 45 patients were telephoned, 18 (40%) had deteriorated. Of the 18, 9 underwent urgent surgical decompression, 6 still await surgery and 3 continue to be monitored. Those who had deteriorated were sent a formal apology and duty of candour letter. Conclusion. It appears that patients with a diagnosis of DCM deteriorate over time. Delays to timely surgical intervention can have a deleterious effect on patient's neurological function. Baseline assessment should be clearly documented and scoring system such as MJOA considered for effective monitoring. Safety netting for deterioration should be standard practice, and a clear pathway for emergency presentation identified. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Knee arthroscopy with debridement is commonly performed to treat osteoarthritis and degenerative meniscal tears in older adults; however robust evidence does not support sustained benefit from this procedure. Current Canadian guidelines advise against its use as first line treatment. Characterizing the use of this low value procedure will facilitate efforts to maximize quality of care, minimize harm and decrease healthcare costs. We sought to understand:. 1). the volume and variations of arthroscopic knee debridement across Canada. 2). The costs associated with potentially unnecessary arthroscopy. 3). The characteristics of surgeons performing knee arthroscopy in older adults. Data were derived from National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and the National Physician Database for years 2011-12 to 2019-20. The study included all elective knee arthroscopies (CCI codes 1.VG.80.DA,1.VG.80.FY and 1.VG.87.DA) performed in day surgery and acute care settings in 9 provinces and 3 territories of Canada. Quebec was not included in the analysis due to different reporting methods. We set a threshold of 60 years of age at which it would be highly unlikely that a patient would undergo arthroscopy to treat anything other than osteoarthritis or degenerative meniscal tear. Trends at national and provincial levels were analyzed using regression. Costs were estimated separately using the 2020 case mix groups (CMG) and comprehensive ambulatory care classification system (CACS) methodologies. Surgeons were classified by decade of graduation from medical school (1989 and prior, 1990-99, 2000-09 and 2010+) and categorized based on the proportion of their patient population who were above (“high proportion inappropriate”) or below (“low proportion inappropriate”) the overall national proportion of ≥ 60 years of age. The number of knee arthroscopies decreased by 37% (42,785 in 2011-12 to 27,034 in 2019-20) overall and 39% (11,103 in 2011-12 to 6,772 in 2019-20) in those 60 years and older (p 25% of patients 60 years and older. Fifty four percent of surgeons who graduated prior to 1989 were considered high proportion inappropriate, whereas only 30.1% of surgeons who graduated in 2010 or later were considered high proportion inappropriate (p < 0 .0001). Knee arthroscopy continues to be a common procedure in patients over 60 despite strong evidence for lack of benefit. Lower rates in this population in some provinces are encouraging for potential opportunity for improvement. Efforts at practice change should be targeted at surgeons in practice the longest. Canada spends over $12,000,000 per year on this procedure, decreasing its use could allow these resources to be directed to other areas of orthopaedics that provide higher value care

The rising prevalence of osteoarthritis, associated with an ageing population, is expected to deliver increasing demand across Scotland for arthroplasty services in the future. Understanding the scale of potential change to operative workflow is essential to ensure adequate provision of services and prevent prolonged waiting times that can cause patient harm. This future service demand for primary and revision hip arthroplasty across Scotland, and the rest of the U.K., is hitherto unknown. We set out to provide projections of future primary & revision hip arthroplasty out to 2038 utilising historical trend data (2008–2018) from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. All analyses were performed using the Holt's exponential smoothing projection method with the forecast package in R statistics. Results were adjusted for projected future population estimates provided by National Records of Scotland. Independent age & sex group predictions were also performed. All results are presented per 100,000 population at-risk per year (/100k/year). The predicted rise of primary hip arthroplasty for all ages is from 120/100k/year in 2018 to 152/100k/year in 2038, a 27% increase. Based on a static 3 day length of stay average this would see 4280 additional patient bed days required for primary hip arthroplasty patients per annum. The number of revision hip arthroplasty procedures for all ages is projected to fall from 14/100k/year to 4/100k/year based on historical trend data. This does not however take into account the suspect increase in primary arthroplasty numbers that is likely to influence future revision rates. Anticipated future demand for primary hip arthroplasty will require significant additional resource and funding to prevent deterioration in quality of care and an increase in patient wait times. Demand for revision arthroplasty is set to decrease, likely on account of improved implant materials, technique, and understanding of best practice to minimise complication risk. This doesn't however take into account the impact of the complex interaction between an increasing primary arthroplasty rate and revision risk. Understanding presented projections of changes to arthroplasty demand is key to future service delivery