We have a national UK database for hip fracture outcome. It has been developed synchronously with an agreed care pathway that is multi-disciplinary, including surgeons, anaesthetists, geriatricians, osteoporosis experts, healthcare managers and lay charities. Care has been improved and audit established for future evolution. The database started in 2007 and now includes 85 units. The synchronous care pathway deals with falls and osteoporosis prevention, perioperative multi-disciplinary care, rehabilitation and outcome results. Key issues are avoidance of delay and cancellation of surgery and how we deal with patients with medical co-morbidities. Outcome is analysed prospectively to take account of co-morbidities and variations in surgical techniques. The care pathway and data base are now universally accepted as a national priority with advice for all UK trauma units to participate. Of the 121 registered units, only 85 actively contribute data. The cost and staff needs for data input are now accepted. To date, 12,983 clinical cases have been entered. Variation of trauma theatre list operating time per head of population and other related resource has been highlighted. This has been accepted by politicians and health managers. The NHS Institute of Improvement has started a rapid improvement plan to support units with poor resource/audit outcome. It is early days in terms of validity of outcome data for technical variations in treatment eg. fixation/replacement/use of bone cement. We have a national increase in resouce for hip fractures. We now have some logic to interaction between surgeons and medics/managers. Objectively struggling units get active support. We accept the possible lack of validity of some outcome data. Some units who look bad on paper should not be disadvantaged

Objectives. Our aim to study the incidence, demographics, inpatient stay, use of imaging and outcomes of patients who have non-operatively managed NOF fractures. Study Design & Methods. The data was collected retrospectively for the last 14 years (Jan 2009- Jan 2023) of all non-operatively managed NOF fractures at a level 2 trauma centre. The data was collected from the trauma board, electronic patient records, radiographs, and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). The data collected as demographic details, fracture classification, any reasons for non-operative management, mortality and further surgical management was done. Patients who died or transferred to other sites for specialist surgery were excluded. Results. Our results showed that 1.7% (62/4132) of NOF fractures were managed non-operatively at our institution. The reasons for non-operative management were as follows, medically unwell 45% (n = 28) in whom operative risk was thought to outweigh benefit and risk of death was high within the 48 - 72 hrs of admission. The second group patients, minimal or no pain and old fractures with comfortable mobilisation 55% (n = 34). Out of 34 /62 patients who were mobilised, 14% (5/34) of this patient subgroup subsequently required surgical intervention for failed non-operative management. In the medically unwell group (28/62) the 30-day mortality was 32% (12/28) with a 1-year mortality rate of 42% (17/28). The patients who were mobilised (34/62) the 30-day mortality was 6% (4/34) with a 1-year mortality rate of 20% (5/34). The combined average 1 year mortality for this cohort was 35% (22/62). Conclusions. Our study showed higher mortality rate for medically unwell group 42%. The patients whose fractures are stable enough to allow them to mobilise comfortably showed 20% 1-year mortality rate and 14% surgical intervention needed in 14 % (5/34) patients. We note that an analysis is necessary to assess the functional outcomes of this subgroup, as well as the potential cost implications. The combined average 1 year mortality for this cohort was 35% (22/62) which was due to the high-risk factors in medically unwell group

In 2007, the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) was conceived in the United Kingdom (UK) as a national audit aiming to improve hip fracture care across the country. It now represents the world's largest hip fracture registry. The purpose of the NHFD is to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fracture care, at an institutional level, that reflect the evidence-based clinical guidelines and quality standards developed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. No national program currently exists, equivalent to the NHFD, in Canada despite evidence suggesting that national audit programs can significantly improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fractures at our Canadian academic tertiary referral center using the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and benchmarks used by the NHFD. In doing so, we aimed to compare our performance to other hospitals contributing to the NHFD database. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients who presented to our Canadian center for surgical management of a hip fracture between August 2019 to September 2020. Fracture types included intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, and femoral neck fractures treated with either surgical fixation or arthroplasty. Cases were identified from the affiliate institute's Operatively Repaired Fractures Database (ORFD). The ORFD prospectively collects patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records, operating room information systems, and from patients’ discharge summaries. All applicable data from our database were compared to the established KPI and benchmarks published by the NHFD that apply to the Canadian healthcare system. Six hundred and seven patients’ data (64.5% female) were extracted from the ORFD, mean age 80.4 ± 13.3 years. The NHFD contains data from 63,284 patients across the entire UK. The affiliate institute performed inferiorly compared to the NHFD for two KPIs: prompt surgery (surgery by the day following presentation with hip fracture, 52.8% vs. 69%) and prompt mobilization after surgery (mobilized out of bed by the day after operation, 43.0% vs. 81.0%). However, more patients at the affiliate institute were not delirious when tested postoperatively (89.6% vs. 68.4%). There was no significant difference in the average length of stay (12.23 days versus 13.5 days) or in 30-day mortality rate (8.4% versus 8.3%). More than half of all KPI's and benchmarks for patients receiving a hip fracture surgery at our tertiary referral center in Canada ranked significantly lower than patients receiving a hip fracture surgery in the UK. These findings indicate that perhaps a national audit program should be implemented in Canada to improve aspects of hip fracture care, at an institutional level. Following evidence-based clinical guidelines and using standardized benchmarks would encourage change and foster improvement across Canadian centres when necessary

A hip fracture represents the extreme end of osteoporosis, placing a significant burden on secondary care, society, and the individual patient. The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) reports each hospital's attainment of the BPT with other measures, along with reporting outcomes. There is clearly wide variability in provision of orthogerriatrician (OG) services across the dataset. Unfortunately, despite overwhelming evidence that provision of an OG service is of benefit, it is presently challenging to recruit to this important specialty within the UK. Publicly available reports from the NHFD were obtained for each of the 177 participating hospitals for 2017. This was matched with information held within the annual NHFD Facilities Audit for the same period, which include hours of OG support for each hospital. This information was combined with a Freedom of Information request made by email to each hospital for further details concerning OG support. The outcome measures used were Length of Stay (LoS), mortality, and return to usual residence. Comparison was made with provision of OG services by use of Pearson's correlation coefficient. In addition, differences in services were compared between the 25% (44) hospitals delivering outcomes at the extremes for each measure. Attainment of BPT correlated fairly with LoS (−0.48) and to less of a degree with mortality (−0.1) and return home (0.05). Perioperative medical assessment contributed very strongly with BPT attainment (0.75). In turn perioperative medical assessment correlated fairly with LoS (−0.40) and mortality (−0.23) but not return home (0.02). Provision of perioperative medical assessment attainment was correlated fairly with total OG minutes available per new patient (0.22), total OG minutes available per patient per day (0.29) and number of days per week of OG cover (0.34); with no link for number of patients per orthogeriatrician (0.01). Mortality for the best units were associated with 30% more consultant OG time available per patient per day, and 51% more OG time available per patient. Units returning the most patients to their usual residence had little association with OG time, although had 59% fewer patients per OG, the best units had a 19% longer LoS. For all three measures results for the best had on average 0.5 days per week better routine OG access. There is no doubt that good quality care gives better results for this challenging group of patients. However, the interaction of BPT, other care metrics, level of OG support and patient factors with outcomes is complex. We have found OG time available per patient per day appears to influence particularly LoS and mortality. Options to increase OG time per patient include reducing patient numbers (ensuring community osteoporosis/falls prevention in place, including reducing in-patient falls); increasing OG time across the week (employing greater numbers/spreading availability over 7 days per week); and reducing LoS. A reduction in LoS has the largest effect of increasing OG time, and although it is dependent on OG support, it is only fairly correlated with this and many other factors play a part, which could be addressed in units under pressure

Introduction of the National Hip fracture database, best practice tariff and NICE guidelines has brought uniformity of care to hip fracture patients & consequently improved outcomes. Low energy femoral shaft fractures of the elderly are not within these guidelines, but represent a similar though significantly smaller patient cohort. A retrospective review was performed at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary using theatre, coding & hip fracture databases. Data was filtered to include patients ≥75, excluding non-femoral injuries. Imaging & notes were then reviewed confirming femoral shaft fractures; excluding open, peri-prosthetic & high energy fractures. Between September 2008 and July 2016 24 patients were identified and split into two equal cohorts, before June 2011 NICE Guidelines and after. The groups were equal in terms of age (Mean: 85.25:84.67, P=0.) & sex (12 females Pre-NICE, 9 Post-Nice, P= 0.22). Our main outcome measures of length of stay were 31.89 days:26 days (p=0.38), time to surgery was 29.8hours: 28.4 hours (p=0.8) and 1-year survival rate conditional odds ratio of 1.48 (p=1.00). A secondary measure demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of post-NICE patients receiving surgery after midday 5/12:11/12 (P= 0.03). The infrequency of low energy femoral shaft fractures makes them difficult to study and production of an adequately powered study in a single centre impossible. The authors hope this work can inspire discussion and a coordinated multicentre approach to answer this question. These patients could easily be treated with the same level of enthusiasm as hip fractures

Aims. COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department. Methods. We retrospectively included all patients who underwent a trauma or urgent orthopaedic procedure from 23 March to 23 April 2020. Electronic records were reviewed for COVID-19 swab results and mortality, and patients were screened by telephone a minimum 14 days postoperatively for symptoms of COVID-19. Results. A total of 214 patients had orthopaedic surgical procedures, with 166 included for analysis. Patients undergoing procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia had a higher risk of contracting perioperative COVID-19 compared to regional/local anaesthesia (p = 0.0058 and p = 0.0007, respectively). In all, 15 patients (9%) had a perioperative diagnosis of COVID-19, 14 of whom had fragility fractures; six died within 30 days of their procedure (40%, 30-day mortality). For proximal femoral fractures, our 30-day mortality was 18.2%, compared to 7% in 2019. Conclusion. Based on our findings, patients undergoing procedures under regional or local anaesthesia have minimal risk of developing COVID-19 perioperatively. Those with multiple comorbidities and fragility fractures have a higher morbidity and mortality if they contract COVID-19 perioperatively; therefore, protective care pathways could go some way to mitigate the risk. Our 30-day mortality of proximal femoral fractures was 18.2% during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to the annual national average of 6.1% in 2018 and the University Hospital Coventry average of 7% for the same period in 2019, as reported in the National Hip Fracture Database. Patients undergoing procedures under general or spinal anaesthesia at the peak of the pandemic had a higher risk of contracting perioperative COVID-19 compared to regional block or local anaesthesia. We question whether young patients undergoing day-case procedures under regional block or local anaesthesia with minimal comorbidities require fourteen days self-isolation; instead, we advocate that compliance with personal protective equipment, a negative COVID-19 swab three days prior to surgery, and screening questionnaire may be sufficient. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:520–529

The 2011 National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) Report has shown our institute has the fewest number of patients meeting the 36-hour target to theatre in the UK (9%) but well above the national average for review by geriatrician (42.5%) at 76%. We believe our timely medical input means patients' are more physiologically normalised prior to surgery. We aimed to review our postoperative results to see if our patients had significantly different morbidity and mortality compared to the rest of the UK. We reviewed 152 patients between the period September 2009 and September 2010. All of the patients were prospectively identified and their information was added to our hip fracture database. Using the auditing software we reviewed the patients' outcomes and compared them to national averages using figures from the NHFD. Of the 152 patients identified 13% met the 36-hour target. The average time to theatre for the study group was 89 hours. 83% of the group had a pre-operative assessment by a geriatrician. The primary reason for surgical delay was a lack of space on a theatre list (61.2%) followed by being medical unfit (16.4%). The average length of acute hospital stay was 16.4 days matching the national average while 30 Day mortality at 7.9% was (0.5%) lower than NHFD figures. We continue to try and improve our time to surgery for hip fracture patients and accept this is mostly related to limited theatre access. Deficient resources due to Northern Ireland's exclusion from the best practice tariff means we are unable to compete with the top performing units in the NHFD. While it makes humanitarian sense to expedite surgery, evidence used to determine the 36-hour target is quoted as “low quality” or “very low quality”. Our data shows no significant difference in outcomes compared to national figures

Introduction. When treating a patient admitted with hip fracture it is useful to have a simple scoring system to predict outcomes, based on admission clerking and routine investigations. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) is one such measure. Its use has been described by Wiles et al (Br J. Anaes. Jan. 2001) for risk stratification in predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality. Objective. Our aim was to use the hip fracture database at Peterborough City Hospital, UK to conduct an independent validation study of the NHFS stratification system. Method. After excluding patients with incomplete data there were 5062 records suitable for inclusion in the study. The NHFS for each patient was calculated using spreadsheet software and then stratified into low (score ≤4) and high risk (score ≥5) patients. The difference in mortality between the two groups was calculated by means of Kaplan-Meier analysis, including log rank comparison and hazard ratio. Results. The difference between the two groups was highly statistically significant, both at 30 days and 1 year:• Those who died within 30 days: Median survival for low and high risk was 13.0 and 13.5 days respectively, a ratio of 0.963 (95% CI 0.18–1.75); Log rank comparison gave a chi-square of 134.9, p< 0.0001; Hazard ratio: 1.168 (95% CI 0.91–1.57).• Those who died within 1 year: Median survival for low and high risk was 104 and 78 days respectively, a ratio of 1.333 (95% CI 0.45–2.22); Log rank comparison gave a chi-square of 233.0, p< 0.0001; Hazard ratio was 0.406 (95% CI 0.39–0.48). Discussion. Using the Peterborough hip fracture database, we have demonstrated independently the validity of risk stratification based on the NHFS as a predictor of mortality outcomes. This supports its further use in the management of patients with hip fracture to identify those at significant risk

Patients who present with a fractured neck of femur (NOF) have a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published clinical guidelines in order to improve these rates. Within this guideline NICE state that surgery should be performed on all NOF fractures within 36 hours. Within ABMU Health board the 1000 Lives Campaign goes a step further and aims to operate on 90% of patients within 24 hours. This study investigates the effect of an additional NOF theatre list on compliance to these national guidelines. This retrospective study was performed between October-December 2013 and December-February 2015. The first period of data collection represents a daily trauma list whilst the second period allowed an additional NOF theatre list. Data was collected using the National Hip Fracture Database and the Trauma Theatre List. The number of patients meeting the national guidelines increased with the presence of an additional theatre list (75.19% v 60%). This represents a reduction to the average time to theatre of 4 hours and 30 minutes (29:47 v 34:17). The additional theatre list improved prioritisation of patients with NOF fractures on the list (29.46% v 13.33% listed first on list) and reduced the rate of cancellations (19.38 v 29.17%). During this study Morriston Hospital did not meet national guidelines, however an additional theatre list did significantly improve average time to theatre. This study highlights the significant impact a dedicated NOF fracture theatre list can have. Winner – Best Paper Award

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) I one of the implants commonly used to stabilise subtrochanteric fractures or communited inter/pertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this project was to assess the outcome of PFNA in a busy District General Hospital. Between November 2009 to November 2012, 76 patients underwent PFNA. These patients were identified from the local hip fracture database, which is prospectively collected. The mean age of the patients was 80.11 years (range of 26.83 to 98.53). 27 were male and 49 female. Right hip was involved in 36 cases and left hip in 40. 9 patients required revision surgery due to failure of the primary surgery. 2 patients died due to other causes. 5 out of the 9 patients who underwent revision surgery had their primary surgery performed by a trainee under consultant supervision and a consultant surgeon performed the other 4 cases. In our series failure rate was 11.8%. We conclude that although PFNA is an excellent device to fix subtrochanteric or communited intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur one needs to be cautious and follow the correct operative technique to avoid failures

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing either total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty for intra-capsular neck of femur fractures between April 2013 and April 2014; identified from entries into the National Hip Fracture Database. PACS and the electronic database encompassing operation notes and discharge summaries were reviewed. 309 patients were identified, 3 of whom fractured both hips during the study period giving a total of 312 operations. The age range was 46 to 102 with a mean age of 82. 59 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties, 143 cemented unipolar hemiarthroplasties, 2 uncemented hemiarthroplasties and 108 total hip replacements were performed. 10 patients required further operations. There have been 5 dislocations: 2 underwent MUA only, 2 treated by excision arthroplasty and 1 converted to THR. 1 patient developed a haematoma requiring wound washout. There were 4 wound infections - 1 treated by a washout, 2 by excision arthroplasty and one patient has undergone first stage revision; an overall reoperation rate of 3.2% comparing well with data published elsewhere

Aims

Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice.

In 2011 health policy dictated a reduction in iatrogenic infections, such as Clostridium difficile (C. diff), this resulted in local change to antimicrobial policy in orthopaedic surgery. Previous antimicrobial policy was Cefuroxime, this was changed to Flucloxacillin and Gentimicin. Following this change an increased number of patients appeared to suffer from acute kidney injury (AKI). We initially evaluated the incidence of AKI pre and post antibiotic change and found a correlation between the Flucloxacillin and AKI. We then made changes to antibiotic policy to mitigate the increased rates of AKI and proceeded to evaluate the outcomes. In this prospective study all patients admitted with fracture neck of femurs were identified from the National Hip Fracture database and data obtained. The degree of AKI was classified according to the validated RIFILE criteria. Evaluation showed a 4 fold decrease, from 13% to only 3%, in AKI after introduction of the modified antibiotic policy. C.difficile continues to be non-existent since this change. Flucloxacillin obviously had a significant impact on this patient group. However, we have shown that with appropriate changes to antibiotic policy AKI associated morbidity can be significantly reduced. Dose dependent antibiotics will now be given based on weight and eGFR

In late 2011 there was a change in antimicrobial policy in orthopaedic surgery to reduce the Clostridium difficile (C. diff) rate, this was inducted top down from government, to PCT, to hospital trust. The previous antimicrobial policy was Cefuroxime, this was changed to Flucloxacillin and Gentimicin. Following this change it was noticed an increased number of patients appeared to suffer from acute kidney injury (AKI). This led us to evaluate the incidence of AKI pre and post antibiotic change and look at the causes behind this. In this retrospective study all patients admitted with fracture neck of femurs were identified from the National Hip Fracture database and data pulled. The degree of AKI was classified according to the validated RIFILE criteria. Evaluation showed 2–4 fold increase in AKI since antibiotic change. Although mortality was decreased in these patients, the incidence of AKI had increased significantly. However, C. difficile has been obliterated by this change. The investigation highlights potential problems with increased rates of AKI amongst NOF patients, since antibiotic change. Flucloxacillin may have significant impact on this patient group. Dose dependent antibiotics will now be given based on weight and eGFR. Further analysis of this new change needs to be evaluated

NICE guidelines support the use of total hip replacement (THR) in preference to cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of fit and active elderly patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture. We hypothesized that not all patients eligible for a THR received one in our unit. We performed a prospective cohort study including all consecutive hip fracture patients admitted to our unit over a 6 month period. Case notes and data from the National Hip Fracture Database were evaluated. Patients were deemed suitable for a THR if they mobilised outdoors with a maximum of one stick, had an abbreviated mental test score of 8 or greater and had an ASA score of 1 or 2. 256 patients sustained a neck of femur fracture during the study period and 36 met the inclusion criteria. 26 (72%) had cemented hemiarthroplasties and 10 (22%) had a THR. THR rates varied with the day of surgery. At our unit we have a low rate of THR for patients who fulfil the NICE criteria for suitability, however it is around the national average. This could be improved upon by increasing the availability of surgeons who are able to perform THR, especially on weekends

Total hip replacement (THR) is NICE recommended for a group of patients with neck of femur fracture (NOF) and guidance published in 2011. In our institution a Hip Fracture Program was established at this time to improve patient care. An audit of the Hip Fracture Program, appropriateness of THR and management following THR was undertaken and compared to NICE standards, set at 100%, and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) results. The case-notes for 53 patients (38 female, 15 male) undergoing THR for NOF between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed: median age 70 yrs (34–87), follow-up 28 months (3–57). All patients were initiated on a Hip Fracture Program. 92% were eligible for THR according to NICE guidance. Pre-operative pain management (67%), hourly assessment of pain in ED (4%), surgery with 48 hours (32%), pre-operative orthogeriatric review (58%) and intra-operative nerve block (38%) are areas for development, but most results are comparable to NHFD. Post-operative care is satisfactory with daily mobilisation (87%) and post-operative pain management (100%). No post-operative dislocation or infection was recorded. There was one case of post-operative DVT. This study highlights areas for improvement in hip fracture management and emphasises the benefits in implementing a Hip Fracture Program in this vulnerable patient population

The majority of hip fracture patients receive operative treatment, although the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) 2012 suggest 2.6% were treated conservatively. One of only a few published reports on the outcomes of these patients has demonstrated that mortality rates beyond 30 days remain comparable to patients receiving surgery. We have assessed the outcomes of conservatively managed patients in our unit. Patients treated conservatively at our hospital between 2010 and 2012 inclusive were identified using the NHFD. Data collection included mobility status, ASA grade, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), mortality (30 days and 1 year) and pain scores. The study group (N=31) had a mean age 85, mean ASA was 4 and mean NHFS mortality risk 21.3%. Morbidity included one case of pneumonia and one infection from another source, however there were no pressure sores or VTE. Three patients later received surgery once their health had improved. Pain control was achieved in 91% patients (21/23) and although mobility decreased, 34.8% of patients were able to mobilise with either two aids or a frame. Given the selection bias for conservative treatment in unwell patients, the higher mortality figure is not unexpected. Although the 30 day mortality data is higher than the national average for operative management, those patients surviving 30 days have a mortality similar to those managed operatively. Despite mobility decreasing from the pre-admission status, a significant number of patients were pain free and could mobilise. Therefore conservative management can produce acceptable results in these patients

The purpose of the study was to identify factors that affect the incidence of deep wound infection after hip fracture surgery. Data from a hip fracture database of 7057 consecutively treated patients at a single centre was used to determine the relationship between deep wound sepsis and a number of factors. Fisher's exact test and the unpaired T test were used. All patients were initially followed up in a specialist clinic. In addition a phone call assessment was made at one year from injury to check that no later wound healing complications had occurred. There were 50 cases of deep infection (rate of 0.7%). There was no significant difference in the rate of deep sepsis with regards to the age, sex, pre-operative residential status, mobility or mental test score of the patient. Specialist hip surgeons and Consultants have a lower infection rate compared with surgeons below Consultant grade, p=0.01. The mean length of anaesthesia was longer in the sepsis group (76minutes) compared to the no sepsis group (65minutes), this was significant, p=0.01. The patient's ASA grade and fracture type were not significant factors. The rate of infection in intracapsular fractures treated by hemiarthroplasty was significantly greater than those that had internal fixation, p=0.001. The rate of infection in extracapsular fractures fixed with an extra-medullary device was significantly greater than those fixed with an intra-medullary device, p=0.021. The presence of an infected ulcer on the same leg as the fracture was not associated with a higher rate of deep infection. In conclusion we have found that the experience (seniority) of the surgeon, the length of anaesthesia and the type of fixation used are all significant factors in the development of deep sepsis. These are all potentially modifiable risk factors and should be considered in the treatment of hip fracture patients

The Dawn Hip - An Effective Strategy to Improve the Management of Traumatic Hip Fractures. Introduction. Traumatic hip fractures are managed with nationwide standards, and are regularly audited and published. A previous audit last year at the William Harvey revealed 66% of hip fractures were operated within 48 hours, compared to the national average of 75%. We implemented a strategy to improve this target by introducing the ‘Dawn Hip’ - a hip fracture operation which is prepared for surgery at 8am on the Emergency (CEPOD) list. Methods. Over a two month period after the introduction of the ‘Dawn hip’, the number of hip operations and start time on the CEPOD list were audited. Performance data were extrapolated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and compared nationally. Results. Three months prior to the ‘Dawn hip’ the mean start time of surgery on the CEPOD list was 9.50am. Two months since the introduction of the dawn hip, 67% of all trauma hip operations were done on the CEPOD list. The mean start time of the CEPOD list improved to 8.38am. Data from the NHFD revealed 81% of traumatic hip fractures were operated on within 48 hours, with the national average being 80%. Conclusion. This is an effective strategy which increases efficiency of existing resources and improves hospital services and patient care. It requires a multidisciplinary approach and participation from both managerial and clinical departments. This strategy not only optimises the care we provide for hip fractures, but also increases trauma list space for other pending trauma operations. By meeting nationwide targets, the trust is rewarded with cash incentives, which is used to further improve services. In the current economic climate, this represents a method of optimising healthcare, increasing cost savings and maximising productivity and efficiency

Recent NICE guidelines suggest that Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) be offered to all patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture who: are able to walk independently; not cognitively impaired and are medically fit for the anaesthesia and procedure. This is likely to have significant logistical implications for individual departments. Data from the National Hip Fracture Database was analysed retrospectively between January 2009 and November 2011. The aim was to determine if patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures admitted to a single tertiary referral orthopaedic trauma unit received a THA if they met NICE criteria. Case notes were then reviewed to obtain outcome and complication rates after surgery. Five hundred and forty-six patients were admitted with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture over the described time period. Sixty-five patients met the NICE criteria to receive a THA (mean age 74 years, M:F = 16: 49); however, 21 patients had a THA. The other patients received either a cemented Thompson or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Within the THA cohort there were no episodes of dislocation, venous thromboembolism, significant wound complications or infections that required further surgery. Within the hemiarthroplasty cohort there was 2 mortalities, 2 implant related infections, 1 dislocation and 2 required revision to a THA. There is evidence to suggest better outcomes in this cohort of patients, in terms pain and function. There is also a forecasted cost saving for departments, largely due to the relative reduction in complications. However, there were many cases (44) in our department, which would have been eligible for a THA, according to the NICE guidelines, who received a hemiarthroplasty. This is likely a reflection of the increased technical demand, and larger logistical difficulties faced by the department. We did note more complications within the hemiarthroplasty group, however, the numbers are too small to address statistical significance, and a longer follow up would be needed to further evaluate this. There is a clear scope for optimisation and improvement of infrastructure to develop time and resources to cope with the increased demand for THA for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures, in order to closely adhere to the NICE guidelines