Aim. To investigate the incidence and time-trend in reoperation due to deep Surgical Site Infection (SSI) following hip fracture surgery. Method. This was a population-based, nationwide, cohort study. We included 74,771 from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fractures Register (1) consisting of patients 65 years of age or older, who underwent surgery between January 1. st. 2005 and December 31. st. 2016 for all types of hip fracture. Cross-linkage with the Danish National Patient Register and The Danish Civil Registration system was made. Demographic data extracted included vital status, civil status, gender, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), fracture classification (AO/OTA 31A-C) and surgical procedures binary registered as joint replacement or internal fixation, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and secondary diseases not included in CCI. Outcome was reoperations due to deep SSI in accordance with the definition from Centre for Disease Control (2). We computed cumulative incidence rates and risk ratios (RR) by calendar year periods and by different risk factors, considering death as competing risk and adjusting for age, gender, CCI, fracture type and surgery type. Results. Within 365 days of primary surgery 2.1% of all hip fractures had undergone reoperation due to deep SSI. During the period 2005–2016, the incidence of reoperation due to SSI decreased from 2.7% to 1.7%, We could not identify differences in reoperation due to SSI within one year regarding gender, BMI or CCI. Patients aged above 85 had about 50% lower risk of being reoperated compared with the youngest age group; 65–74 years (RR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4:0.6). The RR for reoperation due to deep SSI was lower for patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA: 31A1-3) versus femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B1-3), RR was 0.7 (95%CI: 0.7:0.8). However, RR for surgery type (joint replacement vs internal fixation) at 365 days was significantly lower for joint replacement, RR: 0.6 (95% CI: 0.6:0.7). Conclusions. This study shows reoperation risk due to SSI for all types of hip fractures of 2.1%. There was a 45% decrease in reoperation over time from 2005 to 2016. However, the risk of revision is still high, and further action in avoidance of SSI should be taken

Aims

Using the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) data, this study aimed to identify patient, fracture, and management factors associated with survival, mobility and residential status at 120 days. This will allow future interventions to target modifiable risk factors to improve the overall care of patients with hip fractures.

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume.

This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161

Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique.

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume.

This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161

Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique.

Fractures of the neck of femur are common in the older adult with significant morbidity and mortality rates. This patient cohort is associated with frailty and multiple complex medical and social needs requiring a multidisciplinary team to provide optimal care. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes at 5 years following implementation of a collaborative service between the Orthopaedic and Geriatric departments of Southland Hospital in 2012.

Retrospective data was collected for patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted with a fragility hip fracture. Data was collated for 2011 (pre-implementation) and 2017 (post-implementation). Demographics and ASA scores were recorded. We assessed 30-day and 1-year mortality, surgical data, length of stay and complications.

There were 74 patient admissions in 2011 and 107 in 2017. Mean age at surgery was 84.2 years in 2011 and 82.6 years in 2017 (p>0.05). Between the 2011 and 2017 groups there has been a non-significant reduction in length of stay on the orthopaedic ward (9.8 days vs 7.5 days, p=0.138) but a significant reduction in length of stay on the rehabilitation ward (19.9 vs 9 days, p<0.001). There was a significant decrease in frequency of patients with a complication (71.6% vs 57%, p=0.045) and a marginal reduction in number of complications (p=0.057). Through logistic regression controlling for age, sex and ASA score, there was a reduction in the odds of having a complication by 12% between 2011 and 2017 (p<0.001). There was no difference in mortality between the groups.

The orthogeriatric model of care at Southland Hospital appears to have reduced both the frequency of complications and length of stay on the rehabilitation ward 5 years after its implementation. This is the first study in New Zealand demonstrating medium-term post-implementation follow-up of what is currently a nationally accepted standard model of care.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted.

Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05).

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted.

Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05).

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use.

Current recommendations advocate for surgery within 48 hours from time of injury as a keystone in care for elderly patients with hip fractures. A spare population density within regional Australia provides physical challenges to meet time critical care parameters. This study aims to review the impact of delays to timely surgery for elderly hip fracture patients within a regional Australian population.

A retrospective, comparative analysis was undertaken of 140 consecutive hip fracture patients managed at a single rural referral hospital, from June 2020 until June 2021. Factors such as age, time to transfer, time to surgery, 30-day complication and 6-month complication rates were collected. Statistical analysis was performed where applicable.

Mean time to surgery was 33.9 hours. A greater proportion of patients whom directly presented underwent surgery within the recommended 48 hours (91.5% vs 75.3%). The statistically significant delay in time to surgery was found to be 6.4 hours. Lower 180-day morbidity and mortality rates were observed in patients undergoing surgery within 48 hours (13.8% vs 36%), This is in comparison to the overall mortality rate of 19.2%.

Delay to surgery for elderly hip fracture patients was associated with an increase 30-day and 180-day morbidity and mortality rate. A greater proportion of patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a delay in surgery. Early transfer and prioritization of such patients is recommended to achieve comparative outcomes for rural and remote Australians.

In 2007, the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) was conceived in the United Kingdom (UK) as a national audit aiming to improve hip fracture care across the country. It now represents the world's largest hip fracture registry. The purpose of the NHFD is to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fracture care, at an institutional level, that reflect the evidence-based clinical guidelines and quality standards developed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. No national program currently exists, equivalent to the NHFD, in Canada despite evidence suggesting that national audit programs can significantly improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate aspects of best practice for hip fractures at our Canadian academic tertiary referral center using the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and benchmarks used by the NHFD. In doing so, we aimed to compare our performance to other hospitals contributing to the NHFD database.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients who presented to our Canadian center for surgical management of a hip fracture between August 2019 to September 2020. Fracture types included intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, and femoral neck fractures treated with either surgical fixation or arthroplasty. Cases were identified from the affiliate institute's Operatively Repaired Fractures Database (ORFD). The ORFD prospectively collects patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records, operating room information systems, and from patients’ discharge summaries. All applicable data from our database were compared to the established KPI and benchmarks published by the NHFD that apply to the Canadian healthcare system.

Six hundred and seven patients’ data (64.5% female) were extracted from the ORFD, mean age 80.4 ± 13.3 years. The NHFD contains data from 63,284 patients across the entire UK. The affiliate institute performed inferiorly compared to the NHFD for two KPIs: prompt surgery (surgery by the day following presentation with hip fracture, 52.8% vs. 69%) and prompt mobilization after surgery (mobilized out of bed by the day after operation, 43.0% vs. 81.0%). However, more patients at the affiliate institute were not delirious when tested postoperatively (89.6% vs. 68.4%). There was no significant difference in the average length of stay (12.23 days versus 13.5 days) or in 30-day mortality rate (8.4% versus 8.3%).

More than half of all KPI's and benchmarks for patients receiving a hip fracture surgery at our tertiary referral center in Canada ranked significantly lower than patients receiving a hip fracture surgery in the UK. These findings indicate that perhaps a national audit program should be implemented in Canada to improve aspects of hip fracture care, at an institutional level. Following evidence-based clinical guidelines and using standardized benchmarks would encourage change and foster improvement across Canadian centres when necessary.

This study was designed to compare atypical hip fractures with a matched cohort of standard hip fractures to evaluate the difference in outcomes.

Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (NSQIP) targeted hip fracture data file (containing a more comprehensive set of variables collected on 9,390 specially targeted hip fracture patients, including the differentiation of atypical from standard hip fractures) were merged with the standard 2016 NSQIP data file. Atypical hip fracture patients aged 18 years and older in 2016 were identified via the targeted hip fracture data file and matched to two standard hip fracture controls by age, sex, and fracture location. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, major and minor complications, and other hip-specific variables were identified from the database. Binary outcomes were compared using the McNemar's test for paired groups, and continuous outcomes were compared using a paired t-test.

Ninety-five atypical hip fractures were identified, and compared to 190 age, sex, and fracture location matched standard hip fracture controls. There was no statistical difference in body mass index (BMI), race, ASA score, smoking status, timing of fixation, or functional status between the two groups (P>0.05). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the atypical hip fracture group (atypical 7.36%, standard 2.11% p

This is the first study, to our knowledge, that demonstrates an increase in the rate of mortality in atypical hip fractures. Comparing atypical hip fractures with a matched cohort of standard hip fractures revealed a significantly greater 30-day mortality rate with an odds ratio of 3.62 in atypical hip fractures (95% CI 1.03–12.68). Prospective, clinical studies are recommended to further investigate these findings.

Aim

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are devastating complications after hip arthroplasty and infection rates varies internationally between 0.76% to 1.24%. Hemi-arthroplasty (HA) is the gold standard treatment for dislocated femoral neck fractures. Recently, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been suggested to generate even better outcomes. However, little is known about PJIs after hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate PJIs after femoral neck fracture in a population-based sample.

NICE guidelines support the use of total hip replacement (THR) in preference to cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of fit and active elderly patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture.

We hypothesized that not all patients eligible for a THR received one in our unit.

We performed a prospective cohort study including all consecutive hip fracture patients admitted to our unit over a 6 month period. Case notes and data from the National Hip Fracture Database were evaluated.

Patients were deemed suitable for a THR if they mobilised outdoors with a maximum of one stick, had an abbreviated mental test score of 8 or greater and had an ASA score of 1 or 2.

256 patients sustained a neck of femur fracture during the study period and 36 met the inclusion criteria. 26 (72%) had cemented hemiarthroplasties and 10 (22%) had a THR. THR rates varied with the day of surgery.

At our unit we have a low rate of THR for patients who fulfil the NICE criteria for suitability, however it is around the national average. This could be improved upon by increasing the availability of surgeons who are able to perform THR, especially on weekends.

Epidemiologic studies project an increase of hip fractures worldwide. They are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly and represent an increasing burden on a country's health service. The aim of the study was to evaluate the mortality of hip fractures admitted to a regional hospital in Australia and calculate the relative risk ratio of morbidity variables on mortality.

This retrospective review included all patients admitted from 2003 to 2008 to a regional Queensland hospital with a hip fracture. The relative risk ratio for the probability of death was calculated for the following variables: previous mobility (independent, home with help, nursing home), type of treatment (hemiarthroplasty, ORIF, DHS/Nail, total hip arthroplasty, conservative), ASA, comorbidities (dementia, hypertension, cardiac, respiratory, renal, previous hip fractures, diabetes), pre-operative haemoglobin, BUN ratio, length of stay, operative time, anaesthetic time and type (general, spinal) and, gender.

A total of 211 patients (136 female, 75 male) with an average age of 79.1 years were admitted. Seventy-six patients died during the specified interval. The average 30 day mortality was 6.2% and the average time of survival was 318 days. The relative risk of death was above one for the following variables: female gender 1,16; nursing home 1,11; more than 1 comorbidity 1,38; more than 4 comorbidities 1,78; dementia 1,12; diabetes 1,3; hypertension 1,35, previous fractures 1,43; ASA 4 1,5; operating time more than 120 minutes 7,4; length of stay more than 20 days 2,16, BUN ratio>0.1 1,38 and BUN ration<0.04 1,78.

This retrospective project identified a number of variables influencing mortality of hip fractures. These results demonstrate that the relative risk substantially increases with length of surgical time, length of hospital stay in excess of 20 days and more than four associated comorbidities.

Aim

To investigate any intra-operative alteration in management in those patients who had a pre-operative echocardiogram, a retrospective study for one year (March 2004 to February 2005) was carried out at West Middlesex University Hospital.

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) I one of the implants commonly used to stabilise subtrochanteric fractures or communited inter/pertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this project was to assess the outcome of PFNA in a busy District General Hospital. Between November 2009 to November 2012, 76 patients underwent PFNA. These patients were identified from the local hip fracture database, which is prospectively collected.

The mean age of the patients was 80.11 years (range of 26.83 to 98.53). 27 were male and 49 female. Right hip was involved in 36 cases and left hip in 40. 9 patients required revision surgery due to failure of the primary surgery. 2 patients died due to other causes. 5 out of the 9 patients who underwent revision surgery had their primary surgery performed by a trainee under consultant supervision and a consultant surgeon performed the other 4 cases. In our series failure rate was 11.8%. We conclude that although PFNA is an excellent device to fix subtrochanteric or communited intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur one needs to be cautious and follow the correct operative technique to avoid failures.

In order to define the optimum timing of surgery for a hip fracture, we undertook a systematic review of all previously published studies on this topic. Data from the retrieved studies were extracted by two independent reviews and the methodology of each study assessed. In total, 43 studies involving 265,137 patients were identified. Outcomes considered were mortality, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay and return of patients back home.

There were no randomised trials on this topic. Six studies of 8535 patients have the most appropriate methodology, which was prospective collection of data with adjustment for confounding variables. These studies found no effect on mortality for any delays in surgery. One of these studies found fewer complications for those operated on early but this was not found in the other study to report on these outcomes. Two of these studies reported on hospital stay, which was reduced for those operated on early. Six studies of 229,418 patients were retrospective reviews of patient administration databases with an attempt at adjusting for confounding factors. They reported a reduced mortality, hospital stay and complications for those operated on early. Thirty-one other studies of variable methodology reported similar findings of reduced complications with early surgery, apart from one study of 399 patients which reported an increased mortality and morbidity for those operated on within 24 hours of admission.

In conclusion those studies with more careful methodology were less likely to report a beneficial effect of early surgery, particularly in relation to mortality. But early surgery (within 48 hours of admission) does seem to reduce complications such as pressure sores and reduces hospital stay.

Vitamin D is vital for bone health because it assists in the absorption and utilisation of calcium. Vitamin D deficiency may predispose individuals to developing osteoporosis and subsequent osteoporotic fracture. There are various studies in elderly females with hip fractures correlating the low bone mineral density (BMD) with vitamin D levels. But very few studies have evaluated the influence on elderly males. Therefore this study was conducted.

All male patients aged more than 50 years presenting to orthopaedic department, in JIPMER, Puducherry, with either fracture neck of femur or intertrochanteric fracture were included. Serum vitamin D level was assessed in them and BMD of both the hips was evaluated by DEXA scan. The vitamin D levels, T-scores, Z-scores were then analysed and correlated.

Of the total 41 patients evaluated 21 (51%) had fracture neck of the femur and 20 (49%) patients had intertrochanteric fractures. We found that 11 (26.8%) patients had osteoporosis, 17 (41.5%) had osteopenia, and 13 (31.7%) had normal values. The mean value of total T-scores on fracture side was −1.55 and on no fracture side was −1.88. Among them 9 (22%) patients had vitamin D level <20 ng /mL, 15 (36%) had levels between 20ng–30ng/mL and 17 (41%) had >30ng/mL. Total T-score and Z-score on fracture side and no fracture side showed no correlation with vitamin D (p value >0.05) in these patients.

We found significant osteoporosis in both neck and trochanteric regions on both fracture and no fracture sides, yet we had some patients with trochanteric fracture and some with neck fracture on only one side. In view of this other factors like mode of injury, velocity of injury, muscle wasting might have contributed significantly to the type of fracture and side involved. The BMD was found to be lower in patients with neck of femur fracture compared to intertrochanteric fracture, but no correlation was found between vitamin D and BMD scores at neck and trochanteric region.

From this study it appears that there is no direct relationship between the vitamin D level and BMD in elderly males with hip fractures. It may emphasise that in male patients with hip fractures vitamin D may not have critical role in development of osteoporosis. The treatment of such patients with vitamin D supplements to prevent hip fractures is still debatable. However further studies in very large groups and controls may bring more light on this subject.

International and national predictions from the late 1990s warned of alarming increases in hip fracture incidence due to an ageing population globally. Our study aimed to describe contemporary, population-based longitudinal trends in outcomes and epidemiology of hip fracture patients in a tertiary referral trauma centre.

A retrospective review was performed of all patients aged 65 years and over with a diagnosis of fractured neck of femur (AO classification 31 group A and B) admitted to the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales between 1st January 2002 and 30th December 2009. Datawas collated and cross referenced from several databases (Prospective Long Bone Fracture Database, Operating Theatre Database and the Hospital Coding Unit). Mortality data was obtained via linkage with the Cardiac and Stroke Outcomes Unit, Planning and Performance, Division of Population Health. Main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, length of stay.

The JHH admitted (427 ± 20/year, range: 391–455) patients with hip fractures over the 9 year study period. The number of admissions per year increased over the study period (p = 0.002), with no change in the age-standardised incidence (p = 0.1). The average age (83.5 ± 0.2) and average percentage female (73.7%) did not change. There was an overall trend to decreased 30-day mortality from 12.4% in 2002 to 7% in 2009 (p = 0.05). The factors that were associated with increased mortality were age (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.0004), time to operating theatre (p = 0.0428) and length of stay (p < 0.0001).

In accordance with national and international projections on increased incidence of geriatric hip fractures, the incidence of fractured neck of femur in our institution increased from 2002–2009, reflecting our ageing population. 30-day mortality improved and longer length of stay corresponded with increased 30-day mortality.

Introduction

Nonagenarian patients with hip fractures present many challenges to the clinician, both in terms of their advanced age and medical co-morbidities with potential orthopaedic complications. Our aims were to assess outcome of hip fractures in a nonagenarian population with respect to pre-operative predictors of outcome, immediate and long-term morbidity, and survival rates.

Hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral fixation are common procedures performed in trauma units, but there is very little information regarding post-operative pain experience. Pain control is a keystone in the successful management of hip fractures. A sound strategy of pain management is easier to implement in patients where pain levels can be predicted, allowing for an effective balanced analgesic regime.

Analysis was performed on patients presenting with a hip fracture in two hospitals. Patients with a diagnosis of dementia were excluded. Post-operative pain scores were taken from patient observation charts using a verbal analogue scale. Post-operative opiate consumption was calculated from inpatient drug charts.

357 patients were included, 205 patients underwent a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HG) and 152 had fixation with a dynamic hip screw (DG). No significant difference was found in the length of hospital stay. HG patients recorded a mean morphine requirement of 20.2mg compared with 40.3mg for the DG group. Although the early pain score difference was significant (p=0.009), after 4 days, the scores were equivalent. This may support the notion of non-surgical factors determining the total length of hospital stay.

The reason for the elevated pain scores and higher morphine requirement in the DHS group remains unclear. One theory is the fracture site still exists, and it is possible that pre-existing hip arthritis may continue to be symptomatic. It is important to recognise the difference in pain experienced between the groups and analgesia should be tailored towards the individual, allowing for improved peri-operative surgical care and patient experience.