Abstract. Objective. Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to preserve the proximal bone stock for future revisions, so that the first revision should resemble a primary intervention rather than a revision. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in revision THA after failed short stem versus after failed conventional stem THA. Methods. This study included forty-five patients with revision THA divided into three groups (15 each); group A: revision after short stem, group B: revision after conventional cementless stem and group C revision after conventional cemented stem. The studied groups were compared regarding 31 variables including demographic data, details of the primary and revision procedures, postoperative radiological subsidence, hospital stay, time for full weight bearing (FWB), preoperative and postoperative clinical scores. Results. Early stem subsidence (40%) was the main indication of revision in group A compared to peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) (73.3%) and aseptic loosening (53.3%) in group B and C respectively (P=0.021). The mean time to revision was significantly shorter in group A (15 months) compared to 95.33 and 189.40 months in group B and C respectively. (P=0.005). Sixty % (9 patients) in group A were revised in the first year. The mean operative time, blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A compared to group B and C (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Revisions in group A were performed using either short stems (13.3%) or conventional stems (86.7%) whilst 80% of patients needed long stems and 20% of patients needed conventional stems in group B and C (P<0.001). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the latest follow up was 87.07, 87.53 and 85.47 in group A, B and C respectively. All PFFS had excellent results according to Beal's and Tower's criteria; all fractures healed and the implants were stable. Conclusion. The most common cause of failure of short stems is early stem subsidence. Short stem THA has specific indications and patient selection is very crucial. Preoperative templating for short stems and a detailed analysis of the individual patient anatomy in anteroposterior and lateral views are mandatory to predict the correct implant size more accurately. The use of intraoperative imaging can verify the sizing, implant position, and sufficient contact with the lateral cortex. Revision of short stem THA resembled the primary THA. If a standard implant can be used in a surgical revision instead of a longer revision stem, this can be considered as an advantage for the hip arthroplasty treatment concept. However, this only applies if the longevity of the first treatment with a short stem is comparable with that of a standard stem. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Objectives. Modular dual-mobility (MDM) constructs are used to reduce dislocation rates after total hip replacement (THR). They combine the advantages of dual mobility with the option of supplementary acetabular screw fixation in complex revision surgery. However, there are concerns about adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) as a result of fretting corrosion between the metal liner and shell. Methods: The aim of this systematic review was to find and review all relevant studies to establish the outcomes and risks associated with MDM hip replacement. All articles on MDM THRs in the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Prospero databases were searched. A total of 14 articles were included. A random intercept logistic regression model was used for meta-analysis, giving estimated average values. Results: There were 6 cases of ARMD out of 1312 total. Estimated median incidence of ARMD from meta-analysis was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1 – 1.4%). Mean postoperative serum Cobalt was 0.81 μg/L (95% CI 0.33 – 1.29 μg/L), and Chromium was 0.77 μg/L (95% 0.35 – 1.19 μg/L), from 279 cases in 7 studies. Estimated median incidence of a serum cobalt or chromium ion measurement ≥1 μg/L was 7.9% (95% CI 3.5 – 16.8%), and ≥7 μg/L was 1.8% (95% CI 0.7 – 4.2%). Conclusions: ARMD is a rare but significant complication following total hip replacement using a MDM construct. Its incidence appears higher than that reported in non-metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements but lower than that of MoM hip replacements. MDM hip replacements are associated with raised serum metal ion levels postoperatively, but there was no correlation with worse clinical hip function within studies. Studies were poor quality and at high risk of confounding. Pending further work, MDM constructs should be used with caution, reserved for select cases at particularly high risk of dislocation

Abstract. Objectives. Evidence supporting the use of immersive virtual reality (iVR) training in orthopaedic procedures is rapidly growing. However, the impact of the timing of delivery of this training is yet to be tested. This study investigated whether spaced iVR training is more effective than massed iVR training for novices learning hip arthroplasty. Methods. 24 medical students with no hip arthroplasty experience were randomised to learning total hip arthroplasty using the same iVR simulation training either once-weekly or once-daily for four sessions. Participants underwent a baseline physical world assessment to orientate an acetabular component on a saw bone pelvis, and a baseline knowledge test. In iVR, we recorded procedural errors, time, numbers of prompts required and path lengths of the hands and head across 4 sessions. To assess skill retention, the iVR and baseline physical world assessments were repeated at one-week and one-month. Results. Baseline characteristics between the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). The daily group demonstrated faster skills acquisition, reducing the mean number of procedural errors from 76.8±37.5 (S1) to 11.1±10.1 (S4), compared to the weekly group improvement from 71.1±19.1 (S1) to 17.2±10.6 (S4), p < 0.001. The weekly group error count plateaued remaining at 16±6.7 at 1-week and 17.5±8.5 at one-month, the daily group however, showed poor retention with error counts rising to 17.8±10.5 at 1 week and becoming higher than the weekly group at one-month to (23.2±13.0 vs 17.5±10.5). A similar effect was noted for procedural time and the number of assistive prompts. In the real-world assessment, both groups significantly improved the accuracy of their acetabular component positioning, these improvements were equally maintained. Conclusions. Daily iVR training facilitates faster skills acquisition, however weekly practice has superior skills retention. Skills learnt using both regimes demonstrate sustained transfer to the real-world

The development of an algorithm that provides accurate individualised estimates of revision risk could help patients make informed surgical treatment choices. This requires building a survival model based on fixed and modifiable risk factors that predict outcome at the individual level. Here we compare different survival models for predicting prosthesis survivorship after hip replacement for osteoarthritis using data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. In this comparative study we implemented parametric and flexible parametric (FP) methods and random survival forests (RSF). The overall performance of the parametric models was compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC). The preferred parametric model and the RSF algorithm were further compared in terms of the Brier score, concordance index (C index) and calibration. The dataset contains 327 238 hip replacements for osteoarthritis carried out in England and Wales between 2003 and 2015. The AIC value for the FP model was the lowest. The averages of survival probability estimates were in good agreement with the observed values for the FP model and the RSF algorithm. The integrated Brier score of the FP model and the RSF approach over 10 years were similar: 0.011 (95% confidence interval: 0.011–0.011). The C index of the FP model at 10 years was 59.4% (95% confidence interval: 59.4%–59.4%). This was 56.2% (56.1%–56.3%) for the RSF method. The FP model outperformed other commonly used survival models across chosen validation criteria. However, it does not provide high discriminatory power at the individual level. Models with more comprehensive risk adjustment may provide additional insights for individual risk

Background. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are treatments of end-stage hip disease. Gait analysis studies comparing HRA and THA have demonstrated HRA results in a more normal gait than THA. The reasons may include the larger, more anatomic head diameter, the preservation of the femoral neck with restoration of the anatomical hip centre position and normal proprioception. This study investigated (1)whether femoral head size diameter affects gait; (2)whether gait still differs between THA and HRA patients even with comparable head diameters. Methods. We analysed the gait of 33 controls and 50 patients with unilateral hip replacement. Follow-up ranged from 9–68 months. In 27 hips a small femoral head size was used (≤ 36mm); in 23 hips a large head size (>36mm). The small size group consisted of 11 long femoral stem THA and 16 short-stem THA; the large group of 5 long-stem, 8 short-stem THA and 10 HRA patients. There were 14 females/19 males in the control group; 22 females/5 males in the small size group; 13 females/10 males in the large size group. Results. (1) We found a significant difference in step-length between small head sizes and controls (p<0.01) at speeds ranging from 4.0 to 5.5 km/h but no difference between the larger head size and the controls. There was no significant difference in maximum speed, weight acceptance, push-off, mid-stance, impulse and cadence between the groups. (2)Analysis between THA and HRA in the large head size group revealed a significant difference in maximum speed (p=0.021) between long-stem THA (6.338 km/h± 1.542) and HRA (7.756km/h± 0.7604) patients. At 5.5 km/h there was a significantly better weight acceptance (p=0.009) and mid-stance (p=0.041) of HRA compared to short-stems. Impulse was significantly higher for HRA compared to long-stem THA (p<0.05) at all speeds ranging 4 to 5.5 km/h. (3)Males (7.1972 km/h ± .9700) had significantly higher maximum speeds compared to females (6.6524km/h± 1.019) (p=0.017) and lower gait impulse (p<0.01) at speeds ranging from 4 to 5.5km/h. (4)There was no significant difference in Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EQ-5D of patients in the small compared to large head size group. Conclusions. Gait analysis demonstrated a significant difference in step length between THA patients with head size ≤ 36mm and normal controls. There was no difference in step length between normal controls and THA patients with larger head sizes. Compared to larger head size THA, HRA still revealed higher maximum speeds and better weight acceptance. Males had significantly higher maximum speeds compared to females (controls and hip replacement patients). We could not demonstrate a correlation between better gait and Oxford scores or EQ-5D scores but these are known to have a ceiling effect. In a former study, better gait parameters such as longer step length and higher maximum speed have been associated with higher patient satisfaction

Patients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but poorer outcomes after revision surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first 12 months and any differences by type of surgery have received little attention. We explored the trajectories of change in pain and function after revision hip arthroplasty to 12-months post-operatively and compared them with those observed after primary hip arthroplasty. We conducted a single-centre UK cohort study of patients undergoing primary (n = 80) or revision (n = 43) hip arthroplasty. WOMAC pain and function scores and 20-metres walking time were collected pre-operatively, at 3 and 12-months post-operatively. Multilevel regression models were used to chart and compare the trajectories of post-operative change (0–3 months and 3–12 months) between the types of surgery. Patients undergoing primary arthroplasty had a total hip replacement (n=74) or hip resurfacing (n=6). Osteoarthritis was the indication for surgery in 92% of primary cases. Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty had revision of a total hip arthroplasty (n=37), hemiarthroplasty (n=2) or hip resurfacing (n=4). The most common indication for revision arthroplasty was aseptic loosening (n=29); the remaining indications were pain (n=4), aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (n=4) or other reasons (n=6). Primary (87%) and revision arthroplasties (98%) were mostly commonly performed via a posterior surgical approach. The improvements in pain and function following revision arthroplasty occurred within the first 3-months following operation (WOMAC-pain, p<0.0001; WOMAC-function, p<0.0001; timed 20-metres walk, p<0.0001) with no evidence of further change beyond this initial period (p>0.05). While the pattern of recovery after revision arthroplasty was similar to that observed after primary arthroplasty, improvements in the first 3-months were smaller after revision compared to primary arthroplasty (p<0.0001). Patients listed for revision surgery reported lower pre-operative pain levels (p=0.03) but similar post-operative levels (p=0.268) compared to those undergoing primary surgery. At 12-months post-operation patients who underwent a revision arthroplasty had not reached the same level of function achieved by those who underwent primary arthroplasty (WOMAC-function p=0.015; Time walk p=0.004). Patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty should be informed that the majority of their improvement will occur in the first 3-months following surgery and that the expected improvement will be less marked than that experienced following primary surgery. More research is now required to 1.) identify whether specific in-patient and post-discharge rehabilitation tailored towards patients undergoing revision arthroplasty would improve or achieve equivalent outcomes to primary surgery and 2.) whether patients who are achieving limited improvements at 3-months post-operative would benefit from more intensive rehabilitation. This will become all the more important with the increasing volume of revision surgery and the high expectations of patients who aspire to a disease-free and active life

Background. Over 96% of primary total hip replacements (THR) recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) are performed through a posterior or lateral surgical approach. There is no high quality evidence available to support the use of one approach over the other in primary THR and even less evidence when the outcome of revision THR is considered. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 267 patients who had revision hip replacements between January 2006 and March 2010 for aseptic loosening. They rated their pain from 0–10, and used the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short form-12 (SF-12). Results. We performed 275 revision total hip replacements for aseptic loosening on patients in whom the primary operation details were available. Their mean age was 69 years (SD12) with 43% male and 57% right-sided procedures. 205 patients responded to our questionnaires (209/275 hips, 76%). Unfortunately 19 patients had died, 4 had dementia and 13 declined to participate. We were unable to contact a further 33.Grouping by approach, 20% (43/209) had primary and revision lateral approaches, 20% (43/209) had primary lateral and revision posterior and 60% (123/209) had both primary and revision via posterior approaches. The WOMAC and OHS were significantly better in patients who had a posterior approach for both primary and revision surgery, compared to those that did not (OHS p=0.028, WOMAC p=0.026). We found no significant differences in pain, satisfaction or health-related quality of life between the groups. Conclusions. Registry data may help further explore the relationship between surgical approach and outcome in revision hip surgery. A randomised controlled trial of the posterior versus lateral approach for revision surgery would provide a definitive answer. Level of Evidence. 2b - retrospective cohort study. Disclosures. No financial disclosures or conflicts of interests from any authors

Reconstruction of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty presents a significant surgical challenge. Such defects are associated with significant loss of host bone stock, which must be addressed in order to achieve stable implant fixation. A number of imaging techniques including CT scanning with 3D image reconstruction are available to assist the surgeon in the pre-operative planning of such procedures. We describe the use of a novel technique to assist the pre-operative planning of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. Patient and Methods – We present the use of this technique in the case of a 78 year old patient who presented 20 years from index procedure with severe hip pain and inability to weight bear due aseptic loosening of a previously revised total hip arthroplasty. A Paprosky 3B defect was noted with intra-pelvic migration of the acetabular component. Pre-operative investigations included: inflammatory markers, pelvic CT scan with 3D reconstruction, pelvic angiography and hip aspiration. Using DICOM images obtained from the CT scan, we used free open source software to carry out a 3D surface render of the bony pelvis. This was processed and converted to a suitable format for 3D printing. Using selective laser sintering, a physical 3D model of the pelvis, acetabular component and proximal femur were produced. Using this model the surgeon was able to gain an accurate representation of both the position of the intra-pelvic cup and more accurately assess the loss of bone stock. This novel technique is particularly useful in the pre-operative planning of such complex acetabular defects in order to determine if/which reconstruction technique is most likely to be successful. 3D printing is a relatively recent technology, which has numerous potential clinical applications. This is the first reported case of this technology being used to assess acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. The use of this technology gives the surgeon a 3D model of the pelvis, quickly (7 days from CT) and at a tenth of the cost (£280) of producing such a model through the traditional commercial routes. The model allowed the surgeon to size potential implant, quantify the amount of bone graft required (if applicable) and to more accurately classify the loss of acetabular bone stock

AIM. When a hip is replaced using a posterior surgical approach, some of the external rotator muscles are divided. The aim of this study was to assess if this surgery has a long term affect on hip rotation during activities of daily living. METHODS. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to assess hip movements during the following activities:-. Activity 1. Picking an object of the floor in a straight leg stance. Activity 2. Picking an object of the floor when knees are flexed. Activity 3. Sitting on a chair. Activity 4. Putting on socks, seated, with the trunk flexed forward. Activity 5. Putting on socks, seated, with the legs crossed. Activity 6. Climbing stairs. Measurements were taken from 10 subjects with bilaterally normal hips, 10 patients with a large head hip replacement, 10 patients with a resurfacing head and 10 patients with a small head hip replacement. All the hip replacement patients were at least 6 months post-op, with an asymptomatic contra-lateral native hip for comparison. Sensors were attached over the iliac crest and the mid-shaft of the lateral thigh. Data was collected as each activity was repeated 3 times. The tracker recorded hip rotation at 10 hertz, with an accuracy of 0.15 degree. RESULTS. For each of the activities the Normal, Large, Resurfacing and Small Head mean external rotations were:-. Activity 1. -2.9,-6.9,9.1,-0.7. Activity 2. -8.1,-6.5,-7.0,2.0. Activity 3. -15.5,-15.6,-11.7,-15.6. Activity 4. 2.2,-10.8,5.3,-3.4. Activity 5. 33.1,24.6,22.5,23.7. Activity 6. -14.6,-11.5,-13.3,-6.5. The only movement that required substantial external rotation was activity 5 (Socks - legs crossed). For this activity the Resurfacing and Small head hips had significantly less rotation than the normal group (P = 0.01 & 0.03, respectively). A t-test comparing the normal group with the large head group had a boarder line significance level of P=0.07. Significant differences were also found for the following comparisons:- Activity 1 -Normal Vs Resurfacing, Activity 4 - Normal Vs Large head and Activity 6 - Normal Vs Small head. Discussion. The results for activity 5 show that patients with a Resurfacing or Small head hip have significantly less external rotation than the normal group

Background. Accurate implant orientation is associated with improved outcomes after artificial joint replacement. We investigated if a novel augmented-reality (AR) platform (with live feedback) could train novice surgeons to orientate an acetabular implant as effectively as conventional training (CT). Methods. Twenty-four novice surgeons (pre-registration level medical students) voluntarily participated in this trial. Baseline demographics, data on exposure to hip arthroplasty, and baseline performance in orientating an acetabular implant to six patient-specific values on a phantom pelvis, were collected prior to training. Participants were randomised to a training session either using a novel AR headset platform or receiving one-on-one tuition from a hip surgeon (CT). After training, they were asked to perform the six orientation tasks again. The solid-angle error in degrees between the planned and achieved orientations was measured using a head-mounted navigation system. Results. Novice surgeons in both groups performed with a similar degree of error prior to training (AR: 14.2°±7.0°, CT: 15.7°±6.9° (p>0.05)). After training, average error was 10.7°±5.8° for AR participant and 7.2°±4.4° for CT participants. The average improvement per student was 3.5°±7.2° and 8.5°±8.0° respectively (p>0.05). Conclusions. A novel AR platform delivered training for acquiring skills to orientate an acetabular cup implant. After one session, novices trained by a hip surgeon outperformed those trained using AR. In both groups, accuracy remained below “expert” level proficiency (<5 degrees error). Further investigation is required to evaluate if novices retain skills, continue to improve with further training, and can transfer this to clinical practice

Mismatch of bearing component centres and tension of soft tissues surrounding the hip joint can lead to component separation during gait cycle and cause the femoral head to contact the rim of an acetabular liner, which could increase wear and shorten lifespan of an implant. This study aims to investigate the contact and wear mechanics of a metal-on-polyethylene hip joint under dynamic separation by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).

A Pinnacle® cup with a Marathon neutral liner 36×56mm with a 45° inclination was constrained by a spring element in the medial-lateral axis. The spring was pre-compressed by 4mm to represent the corresponding translational mismatch of a simulator testing. Archard's law was used to predict wear over one ISO 14242-1 gait cycle.

Contact pressure is proportional to the load input during the stance phase, associated with concentric contact condition; it increases threefold just before the swing phase (time C), reaching 46.2MPa, where edge loading occurs. Consequently, separation climbs to 3.54mm, which is comparable to the mathematical prediction (3.34mm) and dynamic FEA (3.2mm). The predicted volumetric wear after this gait cycle is 1.22 × 10–5 mm3.

Dynamic separation between femoral head and acetabular liner can result in edge loading, consequently high contact pressure on the edge of a liner. In combination with cyclic loading, fatigue damage could take place and may be worth investigating in the future.

Financial and human cost effectiveness is an increasing evident outcome measure of surgical innovation. Considering the human element, the aim is to restore the individual to their “normal” state by sparing anatomy without compromising implant performance. Gait lab studies have shown differences between different implants at top walking speed, but none to our knowledge have analysed differing total hip replacement patients through the entire range of gait speed and incline to show differences. The purpose of this gait study was to 1) determine if a new short stem femoral implant would return patients back to normal 2) compare its performance to established hip resurfacing and long stem total hip replacement (THR) implants.

110 subjects were tested on an instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway, Amherst, NY), 4 groups (short-stem THR, long-stem THR, hip resurfacing and healthy controls) of 28, 29, 27, and 26 respectively. The new short femoral stem patients (Furlong Evolution, JRI) were taken from the ongoing Evolution Hip trial that have been tested on the treadmill with minimum 12months postop. The long stem total hip replacements and hip resurfacing groups were identified from out 800 patient gait database. They were only chosen if they were 12 months postop and had no other joint disease or medical comorbidities which would affect gait performance.

All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and incline after having a 5 minute habituation period. Speed intervals were at 0.5kms increments until maximum walking speed achieved and inclines at 4kms for 5, 10, 15%. At all incremental intervals of speed, the vertical component of the ground reaction forces, center of pressure and temporal measurements were collected for both limbs with a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Body weight scaling was applied to correct for mass differences and a symmetry index to compare the implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. All variables for each subject group were compared to each other using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test with significance set at α=0.05.

The four experimental groups were reasonably matched for demographics and the implant groups for PROMs. Hip resurfacing had a clear top walking speed advantage, but when assessing the symmetry index on all speeds and incline, all groups were not significantly different. Push-off and step length was statistically less favourable for the short/long THR group (p=0.005–0.05) depending on speed/incline.

The primary aim of this study was determine if implant design affected gait symmetry and performance. Interestingly, irrespective of implant design, symmetry with regards to weight acceptance, impulse, push-off and step length was returned to normal when comparing to healthy controls. However individual implant performance on the flat and incline, showed inferior (p<0.05) push-off force and step length in the short stem and long stem THR groups when compared to controls. Age and gender may have played a part for the short stem group. It appears that the early gait outcomes for the short stem device are promising. Assessment at the 3 year mark should be conclusive.

The aim of this study was to characterise noise associated with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA).

A questionnaire was constructed to assess noise associated with THA. 116 patients responded. All had ceramic-on-ceramic hybrid THA at Glasgow Royal Infirmary between 2005 and 2007 using a Trident prosthesis and Exeter stem. Oxford Hip Questionnaires (OHS) were also completed by the patients.

16.4% of respondents reported noise associated with their ceramic hip. The vast majority reported onset at least 1 year after implantation. The most common noise types were ‘clicking’ (47%) or ‘grinding’ (42%), while ‘squeaking’ was least frequently reported (11%). Noise was most commonly brought on by bending and during sit to stand movements.

No correlation was identified between the incidence of noise and any patient specific factor or demographic variable. The mean OHS at questionnaire follow-up was 39 and there was no significant difference in OHS when comparing noisy and silent hips (p=0.65). Only 1 patient limited social or recreational activities and overall patients felt the noise had minimal effect on their quality of life.

Acetabular component inclination angles were compared on post-operative x-rays. There was no significant difference (p=0.51) in inclination angles of the noisy (47.1°±6.3°, range 30–57°) and silent hips (47.8°±6.1°, range 35–68°). The groups were further analysed for deviation out with the desirable inclination range of 40–45°. Of the noisy hips, a total of 73% were out with this range compared to 63% in the silent hip group.

The incidence of noise within this ceramic-on-ceramic THA group did not appear to be related to patient specific factors, patient reported outcome (OHS) or acetabular inclination angles. Subjective appraisal of the noise revealed that ‘squeaking’ was not common but patients tended to report ‘clicking’ and ‘grinding’ more. The precipitation of noise with bending activities reinforces a possible mechanical cause.

Background

Trust in the validity of a measurement tool is critical to its function in both clinical and educational settings. Acetabular cup malposition within total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to increased dislocation rates, impingement and increased wear as a result of edge loading. We have developed a THA simulator incorporating a foam/Sawbone pelvis model with a modified Microsoft HoloLens® augmented reality (AR) headset. We aimed to measure the trueness, precision, reliability and reproducibility of this platform for translating spatial measurements of acetabular cup orientation to angular values before developing it as a training tool.

The biological significance of cobalt-chromium wear particles from metal-on-metal hip replacements may be different to the effects of the constituent metal ions in solution. Bacteria may be able to discriminate between particulate and ionic forms of these metals because of a transmembrane nickel/cobalt-permease. It is not known whether wear particles are bacteriocidal.

We compared the doubling time of coagulase negative staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant S. aureus when cultured in either wear particles from a metal-on-metal hip simulator, wear particles from a metal-on-polyethylene hip simulator, metal ions in solution or a control.

Doubling time halved in metal-on-metal (p = 0.003) and metal-on-polyethylene (p = 0.131) particulate debris compared with the control.

Bacterial nickel/cobalt-transporters allow metal ions but not wear particles to cross bacterial membranes. This may be useful for testing the biological characteristics of different wear debris. This experiment also shows that metal-on-metal hip wear debris is not bacteriocidal.

Instruments used in surgery which rotate or vibrate at a high frequency can produce potentially contaminated aerosols. Such tools are in use in cemented hip revision arthroplasties. We aimed to measure the extent of the environmental and body contamination caused by an ultrasound device and a high-speed cutter.

On a human cadaver we carried out a complete surgical procedure including draping and simulated blood flow contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600). After cemented total hip arthroplasty, we undertook repeated extractions of cement using either an ultrasound device or a high-speed cutter. Surveillance cultures detected any environmental and body contamination of the surgical team.

Environmental contamination was present in an area of 6 x 8 m for both devices. The concentration of contamination was lower for the ultrasound device. Both the ultrasound and the high-speed cutter contaminated all members of the surgical team. The devices tested produced aerosols which covered the whole operating theatre and all personnel present during the procedure. In contaminated and infected patients, infectious agents may be present in these aerosols. We therefore recommend the introduction of effective measures to control infection and thorough disinfection of the operating theatre after such procedures.

We studied various aspects of graft impaction and penetration of cement in an experimental model. Cancellous bone was removed proximally and local diaphyseal lytic defects were simulated in six human cadaver femora. After impaction grafting the specimens were sectioned and prepared for histomorphometric analysis.

The porosity of the graft was lowest in Gruen zone 4 (52%) and highest in Gruen zone 1 (76%). At the levels of Gruen zones 6 and 2 the entire cross-section was almost filled with cement. Cement sometimes reached the endosteal surface in other Gruen zones. The mean peak impaction forces exerted with the impactors were negatively correlated with the porosity of the graft.

The number of primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) procedures carried out in England and Wales is increasing annually. The British Orthopaedic Association guidelines for follow up currently differ for patients with TKA and THA. In THA the BOA recommends that Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A rated implants should be followed up in the first year, once at seven years and three yearly thereafter. The BOA guidelines for TKA minimum requirement is radiographs at 5 years and each five years thereafter. Few studies have investigated if early follow up affects patient management following total hip and knee arthroplasty

We carried out a retrospective review of all revision procedures carried out in our institution between April 2010 to April 2013. The medical notes and radiographs for each patient were examined to determine the operative indications and patients symptoms. 92 knee revisions and 143 hip revisions were identified. Additionally we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 300 one year routine arthroplasty follow up appointments.

The mean time of hip revision was 8.5years (range 0 to 27years) and 5.6years (range 0 to 20years) for knee revisions. The commonest cause for revision was aseptic loosening associated with pain in 49 (53%) of knee revision patients and 89 (63%) of hip revisions. Infection accounted for 26 (28%) knee revisions and 16 (12%) hip revisions. Only 1% of hip and knee revisions was carried out in asymptomatic patients with aseptic loosening.

We did not identify any cases were a patients management was altered at the routine arthroplasty review clinic and none were referred on for further surgical treatment. The findings of our study suggest there is no evidence for a routine one year arthroplasty review and revisions were carried out in asymptomatic patients in 1% of patients.

An experimental sheep model was used for impaction allografting of 12 hemiarthroplasty femoral components placed into two equal-sized groups. In group 1, a 50:50 mixture of ApaPore hydroxyapatite bone-graft substitute and allograft was used. In group 2, ApaPore and allograft were mixed in a 90:10 ratio. Both groups were killed at six months. Ground reaction force results demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively, and all animals remained active. The mean bone turnover rates were significantly greater in group 1, at 0.00206 mm/day, compared to group 2 at 0.0013 mm/day (p < 0.05). The results for the area of new bone formation demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in thickness of the cement mantle (p > 0.05) and percentage ApaPore-bone contact (p > 0.05).

The results of this animal study demonstrated that a mixture of ApaPore allograft in a 90:10 ratio was comparable to using a 50:50 mixture.

Summary

Five year migration results of 49 large-head metal-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties show good implant stability and no association between implant migration and metal-ions levels, stem and cup position, or femoral bone mineral density.