Abstract

The Gartland extension-type supracondylar humerus fracture is the most common elbow fracture in the paediatric population. Depending on fracture classification, treatment options range from nonoperative treatment such as taping, splinting or casting to operative treatments such as closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction. Classification variability between surgeons is a potential contributing factor to existing controversy over nonoperative versus operative treatment for Type II supracondylar fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate levels of agreement in classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures using the Gartland classification system.

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients aged 2–12 years who had sustained an extension-type supracondylar fracture and received either operative or nonoperative treatment at a tertiary children's hospital. De-identified baseline anteroposterior (AP) and lateral plain elbow radiographs were provided along with a brief summary of the modified Gartland classification system to surgeons across Canada, United States, Australia, United Kingdom and India. Each surgeon was blinded to patient treatment and asked to classify the fractures as Type I, IIA, IIB or III according to the classification system provided. A total of 21 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons completed one round of classification, of these, 15 completed a second round using the same radiographs in a reshuffled order. Kappa values using pre-determined weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess interobserver and intraobserver levels of agreement.

In total, 60 sets of baseline elbow radiographs were provided to survey respondents. Interobserver agreement for classification based on the Gartland criteria between surgeons was a mean of 0.68, 95% CI [0.67, 0.69] (0.61–0.80 considered substantial agreement). Intraobserver agreement was a mean of 0.80 [0.75, 0.84]. (0.61–0.80 substantial agreement, 0.81–1 almost perfect agreement).

Radiographic classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures at baseline demonstrated substantial agreement both between and within surgeon raters. Levels of agreement are substantial enough to suggest that classification variability is not a major contributing factor to variability in treatment between surgeons for Type II supracondylar fractures. Further research is needed to compare patient outcomes between nonoperative and operative treatment for these fractures, so as to establish consensus and a standardized treatment protocol for optimal patient care across centres.

Surgeries for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) significantly increased in the last ten years. Initially developed to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and pseudoparalysis, wider indications for RTSA were described, especially complex proximal humerus fractures.

We previously demonstrated in patients with CTA a different sequence of muscular activation than in normal shoulder, with a decrease in deltoid activation, a significant increase of upper trapezius activation and slight utility of the latissimus dorsi. There is no biomechanical study describing the muscular activity in patients with RTSA for fractures. The aim of this work is to describe the in vivo action of RTSA in patients with complex fractures of the proximal humerus.

We conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing 9 patients with RTSA for complex humerus fracture (surgery more than 6 months, healed tuberosities and rehabilitation process achieved) and 10 controls with normal shoulder function. Assessment consisted in a synchronized analysis of range of motion (ROM) and muscular activity on electromyography (EMG) with the use of 7 bipolar cutaneous electrodes, 38 reflective markers and 8 motion-recording cameras. Electromyographic results were standardized and presented in muscular activity (RMS) adjusted with maximal isometric contractions according to the direction tested. Five basic movements were evaluated (flexion, abduction, neutral external rotation, external rotation in 90° of abduction and internal rotation in 90° of abduction). Student t-test were used for comparative descriptive analysis (p < 0,05).

The overall range of motion with RTSA is very good, but lower than the control group: flexion 155.6 ± 10 vs 172.2 ± 13.9, p<0.05, external rotation at 90° 55.6 ± 25 vs 85.6 ± 8.8, p<0,05, internal rotation at 90° 37.8 ± 15.6 vs 52.2 ± 12, p<0,05. The three heads of the deltoid are more stressed during flexion and abduction in the RTSA group (p

The increased use of the 3 deltoid chiefs does not support the hypothesis proposed by Grammont when the RTSA is performed for a complex proximal humerus fracture. This can be explained by the reduced dispalcement of the rotation center of the shoulder in these patients compared to those with CTA. These patients also didn't present shoulder stiffness before the fracture. The maximal muscle activity of the trapezius in flexion and of the latissimus dorsi in flexion and abduction had not been described to date. These new findings will help develop better targeted rehabilitation programs. In addition, the significant role of the latissimus dorsi must question the risks of its transfer (L'Episcopo procedure) to compensate for external rotation deficits.

Traditionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been the surgical treatments of choice for displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) despite high rates of fixation failure and tuberosity nonunion, especially in the elderly population with poor bone quality. Recently, there has been a significant increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a treatment option in both acute fractures, as well as a salvage procedure for fracture sequelae (i.e., malunion, nonunion, fixation failure, tuberosity non-union). Despite the growing enthusiasm it remains unknown whether functional outcomes after RTSA as a salvage procedure are similar to those following acute RTSA. As a result, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare functional outcomes after RTSA as a primary versus salvage procedure for displaced PHF in the elderly.

A literature search of the electronic databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed was conducted to identify all studies comparing RTSA as a primary treatment for displaced PHF and as a salvage procedure for failed initial management. Only studies with a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Data pertaining to range of motion, patient reported outcome measures and complications were extracted from eligible studies and entered into a meta-analysis software package (RevMan version 5.1, The Cochrane Collaboration) for pooled analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies.

The search identified four studies consisting of 200 patients with a mean age of 73.3 years and a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. There were a total of 76 patients (75% female) who underwent acute RTSA following displaced PHF, while 124 patients (77% female) required salvage RTSA for failure of initial treatment. Primary RTSA was found to have significantly higher American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) (P = 0.04), Constant (P = 0.01) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) (P = 0.0004) scores compared to salvage RTSA. Forward flexion (P = 0.001) and external rotation (P< 0.0001) were significantly greater amongst those undergoing RTSA acutely versus as a salvage procedure. The odds of having a complication (e.g., infection, dislocation, fracture) were 76% lower amongst those who had primary RTSA compared to salvage RTSA (P = 0.02). The overall quality of eligible studies was moderate to high.

Based on the current available evidence, elderly patients with displaced PHF have significantly greater range of motion, higher patient reported outcomes and lower risk of complications with primary RTSA compared to those undergoing RTSA as a salvage procedure. Additional prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

A reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly common for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. A reverse shoulder arthroplasty is indicated especially in older and osteopenic individuals in whom the osteopenia, fracture type or comminution precludes fixation. However, there are many other ways to treat proximal humerus fractures and many of these are appropriate for different indications. Percutaneous pinning remains an option in certain surgical neck or valgus impacted proximal humerus fractures with minimal or no comminution at the medial calcar. In general, a fracture that is amenable to open reduction and fixation should be fixed. Open reduction and internal fixation should be the gold standard treatment for three-part fractures in younger and middle-aged patients. Four-part fractures should also be fixed in younger patients. Hemiarthroplasty results are less predictable as they are very dependent on tuberosity healing. While a reverse shoulder replacement may be considered in patients with severe comorbidities, patients always have better outcomes in the setting of an appropriately reduced and stably fixed proximal humerus fracture.

Successful ORIF of proximal humeral fractures requires a careful assessment of the patient factors (age/osteoporosis/functional expectations), accurate identification the fracture segments (head/shaft/tuberosities) and accessory factors which are of vascular and surgical relevance (length of posteromedial metaphyseal head extension, integrity of medial soft tissue hinge, head split segments, tuberosity/head segments impacted to-gether or distracted apart).

Fixation of the fracture can be achieved by a number of techniques because of the multiple factors that often apply—numerous techniques are usually required of the surgeon.

The principles of fixation require accurate restoration of the head and tuberosity orientation, fixation of the metaphyseal segments (tuberosities) results in a stable circular platform on which the head segment rests. Thus, the fixation of choice acts as a load sharing device not a load bearing device. This fixation is often augmented with tension band and circlage suture fixation. These concepts are especially applicable to the osteoporotic patient.

The order of fixation requires that the medial hinge not be disrupted. If it is disrupted in the younger patient it requires fixation first. All tuberosity segments are tagged with ethibond sutures. The head and the largest tuberosity segment are reduced and held with k-wire or canulated scews, avoiding the central medullary canal entry point. If the head tuberosity segment is unstable in relation to the shaft, the fixation implant of choice (plate/intramedullary) is chosen and the head/tuberosity complex is reduced to the shaft. Depending on the fracture segments and the degree of comminution this may require compression of distraction.

Post-op the patient is immobilised in external rotation to balance the cuff forces. If very rigid fixation is achieved then early mobilisation is undertaken to minimise the adhesions due to opening of the subdeltoid space. If fixation is tenuous movement is commenced a 3–4 weeks.

AVN of the humeral head with good tuberosity head architecure can be salvaged. The diagnosis of AVN is determned at three months with a MRI and consideration given to Zolidronate therapy. Post-traumatic stiffness with good architecture can be salvaged with an arthroscopic capsular release.

We aimed to assess the functional outcomes of elderly patients with isolated comminuted distal humerus fractures that were managed non-operatively.

Retrospective analysis of patients over 65 years presenting to our unit between 2005–2015 was undertaken. 67 patients were identified, 7 had immediate TEA, 41 died and 5 were lost to follow-up leaving 14 available for review. Mean Follow-up was 55 months(range 17–131) Patient functional outcomes were measured using VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity, and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Need for conversion to TEA and complications were recorded.

The mean age at injury was 76 years(range 65–90) of which 79%(11/14) were females. The mean score on the OES was 46(range 29 – 48). The mean VAS score at rest was 0.4(range 0–6) and the mean VAS score during activity was 1.3(range 0–9). 93%(13/14) of patients reported no pain (0 out of 10 on the numeric scale for pain) in their injured elbow at rest and 79%(11/14) reported no pain during activity. No patients converted to TEA and there were no complications.

Non-operative management of comminuted distal humerus fractures should be considered for elderly patients, avoiding surgical risks whilst giving satisfactory functional outcomes in this low demand group.

Introduction

Locking plates can provide greater stability than conventional plates; however, reports revealed that fractures had a high incidence of failure without medial column support; the mechanical support of medial column could play a significant role in humeral fractures. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of intramedullary strut in proximal humeral fracture fixation, the relationship to mechanical stability and supporting position of the strut remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of position of the intramedullary strut on the stability of proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate.

Whilst the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more common for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy, there is still relatively little evidence with regards to its use in complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. It is increasingly felt to be of use in those patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration or bone quality, or in whom there is a rotator cuff deficiency.

We report the outcomes of 14 patients with complex 3- or 4-part humeral fractures or delayed presentation of dislocation treated with reverse TSR. Patients were treated within a two year period from January 2011 to December 2013. The average age at time of operation was 75 (50–91 years) with a mean follow-up of 7 months (2–13 months). One patient moved out of area and one lost to follow-up two months following procedure.

Reverse TSR was considered a salvage procedure for patients with comminuted proximal humeral fractures or those who presented with irreducible non-acute dislocations. At time of last follow-up all 14 patients were satisfied with the results of their operation and functionally independent with activities of daily living. Range of movement post-operatively was good with mean active forward extension 97° (70–150°) and abduction 101° (80–170°). 43% of patients were pain-free, whilst the remainder only required the use of occasional analgesia. No major post-operative complications were reported.

Patients who underwent reverse TSR for dislocation fared better than for those with proximal humeral fractures. The mean active forward extension was 107.5° (90–150°) and abduction 112.5° (90–170°) in the dislocation group (n=5) compared with those who had a fracture in which the forward extension was 91.4° (70–120°) and abduction 95° (80–120°).

The results of these patients demonstrate that reverse TSR should be considered in patients with complex proximal humeral fractures or delayed presentation of fractures. It seems to provide consistently excellent pain-relief for patients, with patients either reporting being pain-free or requiring only occasional analgesia. In addition, all patients treated were functionally independent following operation. Range of movement, particularly for those with dislocation, appear good. Further follow-up is required to ensure sustained results but early studies are encouraging.

Introduction

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. In recent years indications for use have expanded to include elderly patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration, poor bone quality, or presence of a rotator cuff deficiency. There is however relatively little evidence to support its use in these circumstances.

The primary objective of this study was to determine if paediatric proximal humerus fractures undergo significant displacement resulting in change in management.

A retrospective analysis was performed on children who presented with proximal humeral fractures to our institution between 2009 and 2014. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with a fracture of the proximal humerus in the absence of an underlying bone cyst or pathological condition. Patients with open fractures, multiple fractures, neurologic, or vascular injuries were excluded. The primary endpoint was conversion to operative treatment after initial non-operative management. Secondary endpoints were a healed fracture with acceptable alignment at the final radiographic evaluation, as well as the number of follow-up radiographs obtained after the initiation of non-operative management.

A decision to manage the fracture operatively at the initial presentation was made in 14 out of 239 patients. Of the 225 patients that were initially managed non-operatively, only 1 patient underwent subsequent surgical management. In this series, no non-unions, re-fractures, nor fracture-dislocations were identified.

These data support that the majority of management decisions for paediatric proximal humeral fractures are made at the initial presentation. Once non-operative management is chosen, routine follow-up imaging rarely leads to any change in treatment.

There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) compared to hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the management of these fractures.

A cost–utility analysis using decision tree and Markov modelling based on data from the published literature was conducted. A single-payer perspective with a lifetime time horizon was adopted. A willingness to pay threshold of CAD $50,000 was used. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used as the study's primary outcome measure.

In comparison to HA, the incremental cost per QALY gained for RTSA was $13,679. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed the model to be sensitive to the RTSA implant cost and the RTSA procedural costs. Two-way sensitivity analysis suggested RTSA could also be cost-effective within the first two years of surgery with an early complication rate as high as 25% (if RTSA implant cost was approximately $3,000); or conversely, RTSA implant cost could be as high as $8,500 if its early complication rates were 5%. The ICER of $13,679 is well below the WTP threshold of $50,000 and probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that 92.6% of model simulations favoured RTSA.

Our economic analysis found that RTSA for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly is the preferred economic strategy when compared to HA. The ICER of RTSA is well-below standard willingness to pay thresholds, and its estimate of cost-effectiveness is similar to other highly successful orthopaedic strategies such as total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of hip arthritis.

We present a case series of patients who underwent 3 or 4 part proximal humerus fracture fixation using an intra-osseous suture technique. 18 patients are included in the study with follow up data obtained ranging from 1 to 4 years. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and range of movement measurements were taken for all patients.

The mean OSS for the group was 50/60 with a mean forward flexion of 140°, abduction of 132°, external rotation of 48° and internal rotation to the level 10^th thoracic vertebra. Three patients developed adhesive capsulitis, 2 requiring subsequent arthroscopic release. This data compares favourably to outcomes reported in the literature with hemiarthroplasty or locking plate fixation.

An activity based costing analysis estimated that the treatment costs for proximal humerus fractures was approximately £2,055 when performing a soft tissue reconstruction, £3,114 when using a locking plate and £4,679 when performing a hemiarthroplasty. This demonstrates a significant financial saving when using intra-osseous fixation compared to other fixation techniques.

We advocate the use of the intra-osseous suture fixation technique for certain 3 and 4 part fractures. It gives good functional outcomes, significant cost savings and potentially makes revision procedures easier when compared to other fixation techniques.

Contoured locking plates are commonly used to fix the proximal humerus fractures. Their long-term results are unknown. We present long-term radiological and functional outcome of three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with PHILOS plate.

We prospectively analysed 53 consecutive three and four part proximal humerus fractures treated with PHILOS plate between 2002 and 2007. Patients were assessed using Oxford Shoulder Score and DASH score. 44 fractures (21 three part and 23 four part) were available at the final follow up.

At a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (6.4 years–10.8 years) the average Oxford Shoulder Score was 43.9 (range 23–48) and the average DASH score was 7.7 (range 0–36.7). 30% of patients required re-operation (five for hemiarthroplasty, three for impingement syndrome, five for removal of implant). Avascular necrosis (AVN) developed in 10 patients, of which only three required hemiarthroplasty. All except one patient were satisfied with the result of their operation.

Our study supports the use of locking plates for the treatment of three and four part proximal humeral fractures. In spite of some patients requiring secondary surgical intervention in the first few years, the function of the shoulder continues to improve and in the long term patients were satisfied with the outcome. An important finding of our study is that the post-traumatic AVN of humeral head does not necessarily need major surgical intervention. We believe that the possibility of avascular necrosis should not be a major determinant in the choice of surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Michael Robinson has been a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom for 10 years. His special interests include the treatment of proximal humeral and clavicle fractures, and shoulder instability.

The majority of proximal humerus fractures can be managed non-operatively with surgery reserved for approximately 10–20% of patients. The choice of surgical treatment is usually between a humeral head head-conserving fracture reduction and internal fixation and humeral head sacrifice hemiarthroplasty. Current indications for primary hemiarthroplasty include a displaced four-part fracture (with or without associated dislocation of the humeral head) and a head-splitting fracture (with involvement of >40% of the articular surface), due to the high associated risk of avascular necrosis. However, the indications for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures have expanded over the last decade, and many fractures which have previously been considered unsalvageable and treated either non-operatively or with hemiarthroplasty are now deemed reconstructable. This is partially as a result of improved appreciation of sub-groups of fractures which have a better prognosis from head-salvage, the possibility that subsequent development of osteonecrosis may be relatively asymptomatic and the realisation that functional results after hemiarthroplasty are often sub-optimal.

The purpose of this talk is to discuss the current concepts in fracture classification and the indications for operative treatment for these fractures. The novel surgical approaches, techniques and implants which have renewed interest in their treatment are also highlighted.

None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.

Prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with advancing age (Ellman et al). In spite of proximal humeral fractures being common in the elderly, the influence of a coexistent rotator cuff tear on outcome has, to our knowledge, not been previously investigated. This study prospectively assessed whether the presence of a rotator cuff tear in association with a proximal humeral fracture influences functional prognosis.

85 patients treated conservatively for proximal humeral fractures were evaluated prospectively with Ultrasonography to determine the status of the rotator cuff. Every patient was managed by immobilisation of the arm in a sling for two weeks followed by a course of physiotherapy based on the Neer regime. Functional outcome was measured using the Constant shoulder score and the Oxford shoulder score, at 3-months and 12-months post injury.

Sixty-six of the 85 patients were female. The fractures were equally distributed for hand dominance. There were 27 patients with an undisplaced fracture, 34 patients with Neer's Type II fracture and 24 patients with Neer's Type III and IV fracture. There were 43 patients with full thickness cuff tears and 42 patients with no cuff tear or a partial thickness tear. Full thickness cuff tears were much more frequent in the over 60 year age group, which is consistent with the known increased incidence of cuff tears with increasing age.

The outcome scores at 3 and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference for either the Constant score or the Oxford score with regards to cuff integrity. Analysis of these scores showed no correlation between presence or absence of a full thickness cuff tear and shoulder function

The results of this study indicate that rotator cuff integrity is not a predictor of shoulder function at 12 months following proximal humeral fracture, as measured by outcome scores. This suggests that there is therefore no clinical indication for routine imaging of the rotator cuff in patients for whom conservative management is the preferred treatment option.

Displaced two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus pose a difficult therapeutic challenge. We report the results of internal fixation of these fractures in a case series of 50 patients with a locking plate system. All fractures united with no failure of fixation. The mean constant score was 79. One patient developed avascular necrosis.

Internal fixation with locking plate system in healthy active patients, disregarding their age, is a reliable method of treating displaced proximal humerus fractures. The tuberosities should be restored anatomically prior to plate application. Surgical expertise in treating shoulder conditions is essential for good functional outcome.

Introduction:

The treatment of 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly can be carried out with hemiarthroplasty. Also hemiarthroplasty has performed for failed osteosynthesis or conservative treatment in Japan. However the secondary hemiarthroplasty has poor clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.

Proximal humerus fractures are a common fragility fracture in older adults. A variety of treatment options exist, yet longer term outcomes of newer surgical treatments have not been extensively researched. Additionally, intermediate term outcomes following both surgical and non-surgical initial treatment of these injuries have not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to utilise administrative data from Ontario, Canada to evaluate intermediate term outcomes following initial treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

We used data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information to identify all patients aged 50 and older who presented to an ambulatory care facility with a “main diagnosis” of proximal humerus fracture from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2013. Intervention codes from the Discharge Abstract Database were used to categorise patients into fixation, replacement, reduction or non-surgically treated groups. We used intervention codes to identify instances of complication-related operations following initial treatment (including fixation, replacement, hardware removal, rotator cuff repair and irrigation and debridement [I&D]) at one year post initial treatment.

The majority of patients (28,369, 86.6%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 86.2–87.0%) were initially treated non-surgically, while 2835 (8.7%, 95% CI 8.4–9.0%) underwent initial fixation, 1280 (3.9%, 95% CI 3.7–4.1%) received primary joint replacement, and 276 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.8–1.0%) were initially treated with a reduction procedure. In the year following the initial treatment period, 127 (0.4%, 95%CI 0.4–0.5%) non-surgically treated patients underwent a replacement surgery, 292 (1.0%, 95%CI 0.9–1.2%) underwent fixation, and 12 (0.04%, 95% CI 0.02–0.07%) underwent a reduction procedure. Of the 2835 patients who received initial fixation, 57 (2.0%, 95% CI 1.6–2.6%) returned for a shoulder replacement, 80 received secondary fixation (2.8%, 95% CI 2.3–3.5%), 57 (2.0%, 95%CI 1.6–2.6%) underwent rotator cuff repair, 300 (10.6%, 95% CI 9.5–11.8%) had their implants removed, and 16 (0.6%, 95% CI 0.4–0.9%) returned for I&D. Of the 1280 patients who underwent initial replacement surgeries, 30 (2.3%, 95% CI 1.7–3.3%) returned for a secondary replacement, nine (0.7%, 95% CI 0.4–1.3%) underwent rotator cuff repair, and seven (0.6%, 95% CI 0.3–1.1%) had their implant removed. In the group who received initial reduction, eight (2.9%, 95% CI 1.5–5.6%) underwent a fixation procedure, six (2.2%, 95% CI 1.0–4.7%) received replacement surgeries, and five (1.8%, 95% CI 0.8–4.2%) each received rotator cuff repair and I&D in the year following initial treatment.

The majority of proximal humerus fractures in patients 50 and older in Ontario, Canada are treated non-surgically. Complication-related operations in the year following initial non-operative treatment are relatively low. The most commonly observed procedure following initial fixation surgery is hardware removal.

The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether rotational stability testing in Gartland III supracondylar fractures can be used intra-operatively in order to assess fracture stability following fixation with lateral-entry wires and (2) to quantify the incidence of rotational instability following lateral-entry wire fixation in Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Twenty-one consecutive patients admitted with Grade III supracondylar fractures at the Children's Hospital at Westmead were surgically treated according to a predetermined protocol. Following closed fracture reduction, 2 lateral-entry wires were inserted under radiographic control. Stability was then assessed by comparing lateral x-ray images in internal and external rotation. If the fracture was found to be rotationally unstable by the operating surgeon, a third lateral-entry wire was inserted and images repeated. A medial wire was used only if instability was demonstrated after the insertion of three lateral wires.

Rotational stability was achieved with two lateral-entry wires in 6 cases, three lateral-entry wires in 10 cases and with an additional medial wire in 5 cases. Our results were compared to a control group of 24 patients treated at our hospital prior to introduction of this protocol. No patients returned to theatre following introduction of our protocol as opposed to 6 patients in the control group. On analysis of radiographs, the protocol resulted in significantly less fracture position loss as evidenced by change in Baumann's angle (p<0.05) and lateral rotational percentage (p<0.05).

We conclude that the introduction of rotational stability testing allows intra-operative assessment of fracture fixation. Supracondylar fractures that are rotationally stable intra-operatively following wire fixation are unlikely to displace post-operatively. Only a small proportion (26%) of these fractures were rotationally stable with 2 lateral-entry wires. This may be a reflection of either the fracture configuration or inability to adequately engage the medial column.