Introduction: Bone is unique with a vast potential for regeneration from cells with stem cell characteristics. With an increasing aging population, clinical imperatives to augment and facilitate tissue repair have highlighted the therapeutic potential of harnessing mes-enchymal populations from bone. We describe laboratory and clinical findings from two clinical cases, where different proximal femoral conditions (AVN, bone cyst) were treated with impacted allograft augmented with marrow-derived allogeneic progenitor cells. Methods: Marrow was aspirated from the posterior superior iliac crest and seeded onto prepared washed morsellised allograft. The seeded graft was left for 40 minutes to allow adherence of the marrow-derived osteoprogenitor cells prior to impaction into the defect. Samples of the impacted graft were taken for in-vitro analysis of cell viability, histology and biochemical analysis of cell number and osteogenic enzyme activity. The total force imparted during impaction was calculated using a load cell, with three independent surgeons performing a laboratory simulation of the impaction technique. Results: Both patients made a rapid clinical recovery after an overnight stay. Imaging confirmed filling of the defects with increased density on plain radiographs suggesting good impaction of the graft composite. Immu-nohistochemical staining of graft samples demonstrated that a living composite graft with osteogenic activity had been introduced into the defects as evidenced by cell tracker green viability and alkaline phosphatase (osteogenic marker) expression and specific activity. The average peak forces during impaction were 0.7kN corresponding to average peak stresses within the graft of 8.3MPa. Similar forces were seen between operators. Discussion: Replacement of bone loss remains a major challenge in orthopaedic practice. Although allograft remains the gold standard where large volumes preclude autograft, allograft has little osteoinductive potential. We demonstrate that marrow-derived cells can adhere to highly washed morsellised allograft, survive the impaction process, and are of the osteoblastic phenotype creating a living composite. Thus we conclude, impacted allograft seeded with autologous marrow cells allows the delivery of a biologically active scaffold for the treatment of bone deficiency. In addition this is a novel straightforward technique, surgeon independent and with applications in a number of orthopaedic scenarios

Acetabular component loosening and pelvic osteolysis continue to be a significant clinical challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. We present results of 339 cases of acetabular reconstruction with impacted allograft. All patients who under went acetabular reconstruction with impaction allograft between July 1995 and July 1999 were included. Clinical and radiographic data was collected prospectively. There were 339 patients identified. Average age was 71 years. The majority were first time revisions (201) but the group includes 2nd, 3rd and 4th revisions with 34 two-stage revisions and 44 primary arthroplasties. There were multiple surgeons with 2/3 being consultants and 1/3 fellows. Pre and post-operative clinical assessment included Oxford and Harris hip scores, and a modified Charnley score for pain, function and range of movement. Pre-operative radiographs were classified with the Paprosky classification. Follow up radiographs were assessed for graft thickness, component migration, graft reabsorption and lucent lines. There were 10 grade I, 205 grade II, and 103 grade III defects with 3 pelvic discontinuities. Reconstruction methods included impaction only, rim and/or medial mesh, KP plate fixation and reinforcement cages. Follow up average was 6.1 years (4.3 – 8.4) and no patient was lost. Infection was identified in 13 patients (5 recurrent 89% eradication and 8 new 2.6%). There were 6 nerve injuries, 2 remain unresolved and 13 patients dislocated (3.8%). There have been 46 deaths in the group with 3 being peri-operative. There have been 18 re-operations for aseptic loosening. 7 KP plates fractured, 1 cage migrated and 10 rim meshes failed. Factors associated with aseptic loosening include use of a large rim mesh particularly with an allograft thickness of > 2cm. We conclude that impaction allografting is a reliable method for acetabular reconstruction. Careful consideration should be given when allograft thickness will be > 2cm and a large rim mesh is required

Introduction Bone graft supply for impaction grafting can be problematic due to the supply of graft, sterilisation, which alters the biological properties of the graft, and the immunogencity of the graft which may lead to graft rejection. Reducing the amount of graft can be accomplished by using increased amounts of synthetic materials such as hydroxyapatite (HA). This study evaluated the effect of using mixtures of porous HA (Apapore™) with allograft for cemented impaction allografting of the femoral stem in an ovine model. The aim was to test the hypothesis that increased quantities of Apapore™ will be stable and induce similar bone remodelling to that where a 50:50 mixture with allograft was used.

Method Twelve hemi-arthroplasty femoral components were inserted into the right hip of skeletally mature female commercially cross-bred sheep weighing between 65 and 80kg. Femoral components were manufactured from Cobalt Chromium alloy and cemented in place following impaction of the femoral canal. Animals were randomly placed into one of two groups according to the allograft-apapore mixture used. Group 1: Apapore:allograft mixed 50:50. Group 2: Apapore: allograft mixed 90:10. Six animals were investigated in each group. Implants remained in vivo for 6 months. In order to quantify bone formation rates, oxytetracycline injections were given 2 months post-surgery and 3 weeks later, followed by a third administration in the fifth month post-surgery and 3 weeks later. Animals were walked over a force plate pre-operatively and at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively. Twelve readings of maximum force (Fmax, N/m2) were taken and average values of right over left were calculated as a percentage (%AR/AL) and represented how well the animal used its operated leg where 100% represents full weight-bearing. Thin sections (~70μm thick) were prepared through four regions of the femur. The proximal, mid and tip of the femoral component region and one distal to the implant tip were analysed where bone area, Apapore™ area, Apapore™-bone contact and cement mantle thickness were quantified and compared using image analysis techniques.

Results In both groups, the use of graft resulted in the formation of a cancellous network of bone on the endosteal surface which incorporated the Apapore™ granules. When all regions were compared, femoral bone turnover results demonstrated significantly increased rates in group 1 (0.0021mm day-1) when compared with group 2 (0.0015mm day-1) (p< 0.05). No significant differences were identified when the proximal, mid and tip regions in the two groups were compared however, significantly increased turnover was identified in the distal region in group 1 (0.0027 mm day-1) when compared with group 2 (0.0013mm day-1) (p< 0.05). In both groups increased turnover was observed in the proximal, tip and distal regions with least in the mid region of the stem. Ground Reaction Force (GRF) results demonstrated no significant differences between the two experimental groups at 8, 16 and 24 weeks postoperatively. In both groups, a significant decline in function was demonstrated 8 weeks post-op when compared with pre-operative values and in both groups function gradually increased over time. Results for new bone area demonstrated significantly increased new bone in the proximal and distal regions in both groups (proximal =7.94mm2 and 7.13mm2; distal =7.03mm2 and 8.17mm2, group 1 and 2 respectively) with least new bone in the mid region of the stem (4.53mm2 and 4.79mm2). No significant differences in any of the regions were demonstrated when group 1 and 2 were compared. In both groups, significantly increased amounts of Apapore™ was observed in the proximal and distal regions of the femoral stem with least in the mid and tip region. No significant difference in cement mantle thickness was identified between the two groups.

Discussion Results demonstrated that hips maintained functional stability when a higher amount of Apapore™ mixture was used. Results for bone turnover rates and the amount of new bone formation in the 90:10 mixture demonstrated Apapore™ to be a comparable and suitable alternative to replace allograft in impaction grafting of a femoral component.

We have reviewed 29 patients (30 hips) who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty using a Freeman metal-backed acetabular component and acetabular impaction allografting. The mean follow-up was for 15.3 years (12 to 17).

Five patients (5 hips) died with the prosthesis in situ and four (4 hips) were lost to follow-up. Twelve hips had failed and in the remaining nine there were minor symptoms. The mean time to failure requiring further surgery was nine years. Excluding patients who were lost to follow-up or had died, 72% of the hips were radiologically loose at the last review. The commonest pattern in those requiring revision was failure of the reinforcement ring in adduction with remodelling of the medial wall.

Of the nine patients who had not undergone revision, one with bilateral replacements had no current radiographs and only three of the remaining seven replacements had no radiological signs of loosening.

The short-term results for this technique have been reported to be satisfactory, but in the long term they are not. The factors associated with failure include the design of the prosthesis, which has been implicated in disappointing long-term results when used in primary arthroplasty, but not with the frequency of failure found in this series. It seems that the reliance on peripheral screw fixation over a bed of allograft without bridging the graft does not provide sufficient stability to allow incorporation of the graft.

Twenty-nine patients (30 hips) with uncemented acetabular impaction allografting contained behind a metal backed component screwed to the pelvis at revision hip arthroplasty were reviewed at 12 to17 years (average 15.3 years) follow up. Five patients had died with the prosthesis in situ, 4 patients were lost to follow up, 13 patients had failed requiring further revision (only one failed prior to 5 years) and 9 survivors were minimally asymptomatic. The mean time to failure warranting further surgery was 9 years.

Analysis of available serial radiographs (24 cases) demonstrated signs of loosening (migration, progressive radiolucent lines, screw breakage) in 54% of the latest radiographs of all cases. Removing those lost to follow up or deceased, 72% were radiologically loose (in the intact asymptomatic group 57% could be defined as loose). Additionally, in 70% of the cases the acetabular component tended to fail in a varus manner as the medial wall remodelled.

These results indicate as previously published, short term results for this technique are satisfactory but in the long term they are not. Factors associated with this include the pressfit nature of the polyethylene liner which has been implicated in disappointing long term results for this prosthesis in primary applications, but not of the level of failure encountered in the current series. This experience suggests that the reliance on screw fixation over a bed of allograft in the absence of cement supplementation does not provide sufficient stability for reliable bone graft incorporation.

The method reported above should be abandoned.

We determined the midterm survival, incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and the enhancement of the width of the femur when combining struts and impacted bone allografts in 24 patients (25 hips) with severe femoral bone loss who underwent revision hip surgery. The pre-operative diagnosis was aseptic loosening in 16 hips, second-stage reconstruction in seven, peri-prosthetic fracture in one and stem fracture in one hip. A total of 14 hips presented with an Endoklinik grade 4 defect and 11 hips a grade 3 defect. The mean pre-operative Merle D’Aubigné and Postel score was 5.5 points (1 to 8).

The survivorship was 96% (95% confidence interval 72 to 98) at a mean of 54.5 months (36 to 109). The mean functional score was 17.3 points (16 to 18). One patient in which the strut did not completely bypass the femoral defect was further revised using a long cemented stem due to peri-prosthetic fracture at six months post-operatively. The mean subsidence of the stem was 1.6 mm (1 to 3). There was no evidence of osteolysis, resorption or radiolucencies during follow-up in any hip. Femoral width was enhanced by a mean of 41% (19% to 82%). A total of 24 hips had partial or complete bridging of the strut allografts.

This combined biological method was associated with a favourable survivorship, a low incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and enhancement of the width of the femur in revision total hip replacement in patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss.

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of revision of the femoral component of a total hip replacement using impaction bone grafting. Femoral revision with an impacted allograft was performed on 29 patients (31 hips). In all, 21 hips (68%) had grade III or IV femoral defects according to the Endo-Klinik classification. A total of 11 patients (12 hips) died before the ten-year follow-up period. Of the remaining patients, 18 patients (19 hips) were followed for 10 to 15 years; three further patients died during this time. None of the 31 stems underwent further revision of their stem. However, four stems showed extensive subsidence (> 15 mm). One of these patients had a femoral fracture that required fixation. Three other patients had a femoral fracture, two of which required fixation and the other was treated conservatively. Patients with a femoral fracture and/or severe subsidence had significantly more grade IV defects (six of seven hips; p = 0.004). One patient needed a closed reduction for dislocation. Impaction allografting in revision hip surgery gives good long-term results for femora with grades I, II and III Endo-Klinik-classified defects. Extensive subsidence and femoral fractures were seen mainly in patients with grade IV damaged femora

Failure of total hip arthroplasty with acetabular deficiency occurred in 55 patients (60 hips) and was treated with acetabular revision using morsellised allograft and a cemented metal-backed component. A total of 50 patients (55 hips) were available for clinical and radiological evaluation at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (3 to 9.5). No hip required further revision of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening. All the hips except one had complete incorporation of the allograft demonstrated on the radiographs. A complete radiolucent line of > 1 mm was noted in two hips post-operatively. A good to excellent result occurred in 50 hips (91%). With radiological evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component as the end-point, the survivorship at a mean of 5.8 years after surgery was 96.4%. The use of impacted allograft chips in combination with a cemented metal-backed acetabular component and screw fixation can achieve good medium-term results in patients with acetabular bone deficiency

This study explored the relationship between the initial stability of the femoral component and penetration of cement into the graft bed following impaction allografting. Impaction allografting was carried out in human cadaveric femurs. In one group the cement was pressurised conventionally but in the other it was not pressurised. Migration and micromotion of the implant were measured under simulated walking loads. The specimens were then cross-sectioned and penetration of the cement measured. Around the distal half of the implant we found approximately 70% and 40% of contact of the cement with the endosteum in the pressure and no-pressure groups, respectively. The distal migration/micromotion, and valgus/varus migration were significantly higher in the no-pressure group than in that subjected to pressure. These motion components correlated negatively with the mean area of cement and its contact with the endosteum. The presence of cement at the endosteum appears to play an important role in the initial stability of the implant following impaction allografting

Impaction allograft is an established method of securing initial stability of an implant in arthroplasty. Subsequent bone integration can be prolonged, and the volume of allograft may not be maintained. Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone has an anabolic effect on bone and may therefore improve integration of an implant. Using a canine implant model we tested the hypothesis that administration of parathyroid hormone may improve osseointegration of implants surrounded by bone graft. In 20 dogs a cylindrical porous-coated titanium alloy implant was inserted into normal cancellous bone in the proximal humerus and surrounded by a circumferential gap of 2.5 mm. Morsellised allograft was impacted around the implant. Half of the animals were given daily injections of human parathyroid hormone (1–34) 5 μg/kg for four weeks and half received control injections. The two groups were compared by mechanical testing and histomorphometry. We observed a significant increase in new bone formation within the bone graft in the parathyroid hormone group. There were no significant differences in the volume of allograft, bone-implant contact or in the mechanical parameters. These findings suggest that parathyroid hormone improves new bone formation in impacted morsellised allograft around an implant and retains the graft volume without significant resorption. Fixation of the implant was neither improved nor compromised at the final follow-up of four weeks

Introduction:. The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use of impaction allografting with cement. History:. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morselised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. Biology:. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularization, incorporation and remodeling of morselised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2mm to 3mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. Type of bone:. The size of the bone chips used as morselised allograft is important. The graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. It is recommended that particles of 3–5mm in diameter make up the bulk of the graft. A bone slurry, such as that produced by blunted bone mills, or by the use of acetabular reamers or high speed burrs would not give satisfactory stability. A wide range of particle sizes is recommended in order to achieve the greatest stability. The cement mantle:. A satisfactory cement mantle is required to ensure the longevity of any cemented stem. The primary determinant of cement mantle thickness is the differential between the graft impactors and the final stem. All femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle that is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. Stem design:. The technique of impaction allografting on the femoral side was first and most successfully reported using a highly polished stem with a double tapered geometry and no collar. It is thought to be ideal for this technique as it can subside within the cement mantle, thus generating hoop stresses on the cement which creeps, potentially maintaining physiological loads on the supporting bone. The extension of this technique to other stems has led to some controversy. Confounding factors such as surgical technique, the impaction system available, the type and size of allograft bone used, and the extent of the preoperative bone loss, will undoubtedly continue to influence such comparisons. It appears that the exact stem configuration may not be as critical as its surface finish, the amount of graft impaction possible and the cement mantle produced. The introduction of longer stems and impactors in the last decade has undoubtedly further increased the scope of this technique. Conclusion:. Impaction allografting is the only technique currently available that reverses the loss of bone stock seen in a revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, this technique does not sacrifice host tissue, and could facilitate further surgery. Impaction allografting, performed with great attention to detail using appropriate equipment, represents an exciting reconstructive solution for contained femoral defects

AIM. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a potentially debilitating disease of the hip in young adults. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) of morcellised fresh frozen allograft is used in a number of orthopaedic conditions. This study has examined the potential of skeletal stem cells (SSC) to augment the mechanical properties of impacted bone graft and we translate these findings into clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN. We have examined the effect of SSC density on augmentation of bone formation. An in vitro model was developed to replicate the surgical IBG process. Plain allograft was used as the control, and the SSC's seeded at a density of 5×103, 5×104 and 2×105 cells per cc of allograft for the experimental groups. All samples were cultured for 2 weeks and mechanically tested to determine shear strength using the Mohr Coulomb failure curve. The approach was translated to 3 patients with early avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The patient's bone marrow was concentrated in theatre using a centrifugation device and the concentrated fraction of SSC's were seeded onto milled allograft. The patient's necrotic bone was drilled, curetted and replaced with impacted allograft seeded with SSC's. Osteogenic potential of concentrated and unconcentrated marrow was simultaneously compared in vitro by colony forming unit assays. RESULTS. The mechanical properties of the impacted allograft was significantly improved as a function of increasing SSC density. The difference compared to the control plain allograft was highly significant at the 2×105 level (p=0.001). Autologous SCC's on impacted bone allograft was subsequently applied in 3 patient cases and up to two year follow up demonstrates no deleterious effect. Critically the analysis of concentrated marrow demonstrated a higher SSC count in vitro than plain marrow aspirate. DISCUSSION. We have demonstrated the potential of skeletal stem cells to augment the mechanical properties of impacted bone allograft in a laboratory model and subsequently translated these findings into a new technique for the treatment of AVN of the femoral head. Such an approach provides not only improved mechanical support to the overlying cartilage but critically improved biology for new bone formation. The early clinical results are encouraging and indicate potential use also in fracture non-unions and void filling of bone defects

The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use impaction allografting with cement. This has captured the attention of the orthopaedic community because of its potential for reconstituting femoral bone stock. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morsellised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularisation, incorporation and remodelling of morsellised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2–3mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. The size of the bone chips used as morsellised allograft is important. The graft behaves as a friable aggregate and its resistance to complex forces depends on grading, normal load and compaction. It is recommended that particles of 3–5mm in diameter make up the bulk of the graft. A bone slurry, such as that produced by blunted bone mills, or by the use of acetabular reamers or high speed burrs would not give satisfactory stability. A wide range of particle sizes is recommended in order to achieve the greatest stability. Future considerations will include the potential for either adding biomaterials to the allograft, or ultimately substituting it completely. A satisfactory cement mantle is required to ensure the longevity of any cemented stem. The primary determinant of cement mantle thickness is the differential between the graft impactors and the final stem. All femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle that is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. The technique of impaction allografting on the femoral side was first and most successfully reported using a highly polished stem with a double tapered geometry and no collar. It is thought to be ideal for this technique as it can subside within the cement mantle, thus generating hoop stresses on the cement which creeps, potentially maintaining physiological loads on the supporting bone. The extension of this technique to other stems has led to some controversy. Confounding factors such as surgical technique, the impaction system available, the type and size of allograft bone used, and the extent of the pre-operative bone loss, will undoubtedly continue to influence such comparisons. It appears that the exact stem configuration may not be as critical as its surface finish, the amount of graft impaction possible and the cement mantle produced. Impaction allografting is the only technique currently available that reverses the loss of bone stock seen in a revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, this technique does not sacrifice host tissue, and could facilitate further surgery. Impaction allografting, performed with great attention to detail using appropriate equipment, represents an exciting reconstructive solution for contained femoral defects. Its role in larger and combined defects remains open to scrutiny. Careful observation and cautious optimism are necessary as further refinements may well improve the predictability of the clinical results and expand the indications for this important addition to the armamentarium of the revision surgeon

Impaction allografting is increasingly used for the treatment of failed total hip replacements. In six human cadaveric femurs the impaction allografting procedure was performed to comprehensively describe the postoperative morphology of impaction allografting. After the procedure, the specimens were sectioned and prepared for histomorphometric analysis. The graft porosity was lowest in Gruen zone four (52%) and highest in Gruen zone one (76%). At the level of Gruen zone six and two, virtually the entire cross-section was filled with bone cement. The presented data will serve as a baseline for future investigations of the impaction allografting. Impaction allografting is an attractive procedure for the treatment of failed total hip replacements. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively describe the morphology of impaction allografting post operatively to form a baseline for further investigations. Three experienced surgeons performed the impaction allografting procedure on six cadaveric femurs. After the procedure, the femurs were cut in 6mm thick transverse sections and processed for histomorphometric analysis. The porosity of the impacted graft was highest proximally in Gruen zone one (76%) and lowest in Gruen zone four (52%). Below the tip of the stem (Gruen zone four), the mean cement penetration was significantly lower compared to the proximal part of the femur. The averaged residual impacted graft layer in Gruen zone six and two was (0.5mm SD 0.4mm) significantly thinner compared with Gruen zone’s one, 7/1, and four. In the region of Gruen zone six and two the entire cross-section was penetrated with bone cement with almost no residual graft layer (Figure). Even the simulated lytic defects in this region were filled with the graft cement composite which may not be remodelled by the host bone. The graft porosity was found to be highest proximally and lowest distally. In the region of Gruen zone six and two the entire cross-section was penetrated with bone cement with almost no residual graft layer. This investigation will serve as a baseline for future studies of the mechanical and biological processes that make the impaction allografting a successful procedure. Funding: Stryker Howmedica and DePuy for provided implants and instruments. Please contact author for figures and/or diagrams

Impaction grafting is an excellent option for acetabular revision. It is technique specific and very popular in England and the Netherlands and to some degree in other European centers. The long term published results are excellent. It is, however, technique dependent and the best results are for contained cavitary defects. If the defect is segmental and can be contained by a single mesh and impaction grafting, the results are still quite good. If, however, there is a larger segmental defect of greater than 50% of the acetabulum or a pelvic discontinuity, other options should be considered. Segmental defects of 25–50% can be managed by minor column (shelf) or figure of 7 structural allografts with good long term results. Porous metal augments are now a good option with promising early to mid-term results. Segmental defects of greater than 50% require a structural graft or porous augment usually protected by a cage. If there is an associated pelvic discontinuity then a cup cage is a better solution. An important question is does impaction grafting facilitate rerevision surgery? There is no evidence to support this but some histological studies of impacted allograft would suggest that it may. On the other hand there are papers that show that structural allografts do restore bone stock for further revision surgery. Also the results of impaction grafting are best in the hands of surgeons comfortable with using cement on the acetabular side, and one of the reasons why this technique is not as popular in North America

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical models of two frequently used techniques for reconstructing severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) – the Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System (TMARS) and custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) – using virtual modelling.

Femoral revision in cemented THA might include some technical difficulties, based on loss of bone stock and cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone stock, inadequate fixation, cortical perforation or consequent fractures. Cemented THA has become an extremely successful operation with excellent long-term results. Although showing decreasing popularity in North America, it always remained a popular choice for the elderly patients in Europe and other parts of the world. Various older and recent studies presented excellent long-term results, for cemented fixation of the cup as well as the stem. Besides optimal component orientation, a proper cementing technique is of major importance to assure longevity of implant fixation. Consequently a meticulous bone bed preparation assures the mechanical interlock between the implant component, cement and the final bone bed. Pre-operative steps as proper implant sizing/ templating, ensuring an adequate cement mantle thickness, and hypotensive anaesthesia, minimizing bleeding at the bone cement interface, are of major importance. Additionally, femoral impaction grafting, in combination with a primary cemented stem, allows for femoral bone restoration due to incorporation and remodeling of the allograft bone by the host skeleton. Historically, it has been first performed and described in Exeter in 1987, utilizing a cemented tapered polished stem in combination with morselised fresh frozen bone grafts. The technique was refined by the development of designated instruments, which have been implemented by the Nijmegen group from Holland. Indications might include all femoral revisions with bone stock loss, while the Endo-Clinic experience is mainly based on revision of cemented stems. Cavitary bone defects affecting meta- and diaphysis leading to a wide or so called “drain pipe” femora, are optimal indications for this technique, especially in young patients. Contraindications are mainly: septical revisions, extensive circumferential cortical bone loss and noncompliance of the patient. The cement mantle is of importance, as it acts as the distributor of force between the stem and bone graft and seals the stem. A cement mantle of at least 2 mm has shown favorable results. Originally the technique is described with a polished stem. We use standard brushed stems with comparable results. Relevant complications include mainly femoral fractures due to the hardly impacted allograft bone. Subsidence of tapered polished implants might be related to cold flow within the cement mantle, however, could also be related to micro cement mantle fractures, leading to early failure. Subsidence should be less than 5 mm. Impaction grafting might technically be more challenging and more time consuming than cement-free distal fixation techniques. It, however, enables a reliable restoration of bone stock which might especially become important in further revision scenarios in younger patients

Introduction. The reconstructive hip surgeon is commonly faced with complex cases where severe bone loss makes conventional revision techniques difficult or impossible. This problem is likely to increase in future, as there is a good correlation between the degree of bone loss seen and number of previous total hip operations. In such situations, one alternative is the use impaction allografting with cement. This has captured the attention of the orthopaedic community because of its potential for reconstituting femoral bone stock. History. The first clinical reports of impaction allografting on the femoral side were in relation to revision with cementless stems. The use of morselised bone with cement on the femoral side was first reported by the Exeter group. Biology. The great enthusiasm with which this technique has been received is related to its biological potential to increase bone stock. The rapid revascularization, incorporation and remodelling of morselised compacted cancellous allograft differs dramatically from structural allografting where bone ingrowth usually is limited to 2–3 mm. Histological evidence for bony reconstitution has been presented from postmortem retrievals, and from biopsies at the time of trochanteric wire removal. Impaction allografting, performed with great attention to detail using appropriate equipment, represents an exciting reconstructive solution for contained femoral defects. Its role in larger and combined defects remains open to scrutiny. A number of technical issues with regards to allograft preparation and prosthetic design have been resolved over the past decade. The necessary intra-operative precautions are now appreciated, and the high complication rates seen in some centers have been explained in simple terms. Careful observation and cautious optimism are necessary as further refinements may well improve the predictability of the clinical results and expand the indications for this important addition to the armamentarium of the revision surgeon. The technique of impaction allografting of the femur has great potential, and is here to stay as a reconstructive solution to the deficient proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty. Although many questions remain unanswered, the capacity for impaction allografting to act as a truly biologic augmentation of the proximal femur makes this technique the modern bridge from revision arthroplasty to reconstructive hip surgery