Aims. Postoperative malalignment of the femur is one of the main complications in distal femur fractures. Few papers have investigated the impact of intraoperative malalignment on postoperative function and bone healing outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate how intraoperative fracture malalignment affects postoperative bone healing and functional outcomes. Methods. In total, 140 patients were retrospectively identified from data obtained from a database of hospitals participating in a trauma research group. We divided them into two groups according to coronal plane malalignment of more than 5°: 108 had satisfactory fracture alignment (< 5°, group S), and 32 had unsatisfactory alignment (> 5°, group U). Patient characteristics and injury-related factors were recorded. We compared the rates of nonunion, implant failure, and reoperation as healing outcomes and Knee Society Score (KSS) at three, six, and 12 months as functional outcomes. We also performed a sub-analysis to assess the effect of fracture malalignment by plates and nails on postoperative outcomes. Results. The rates of nonunion and reoperation in group U were worse than those in group S (25.0% vs 14.3%; 15.6% vs 5.6%), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.180 and p = 0.126, respectively). Mean KSS in group U at all follow-up periods was significantly worse that in group S (75.7 (SD 18.8) vs 86.0 (SD 8.7); p < 0.001; 78.9 (SD 17.2) vs 89.1 (SD 9.8); p < 0.001; 85.0 (SD 11.9) vs 91.1 (SD 7.2); p = 0.002, respectively). In the sub-analysis of plates, mean KSS was significantly worse in group U at three and six months. In the sub-analysis of nails, the rate of reoperation was significantly higher in group U (28.6% vs 5.8%; p = 0.025), and mean KSS at six and 12 months was significantly worse in Group U. Conclusion. To obtain good postoperative functional results, intraoperative alignment of the coronal plane should be accurately restored to less than 5°. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):165–172

Management of bisphosphonate-associated subtrochanteric fractures remains opinion- or consensus-based. There are limited data regarding the outcomes of this fracture. We retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive female patients with a mean age of 67.5 years (47 to 91) who were treated surgically between May 2004 and October 2009. The mean follow-up was 21.7 months (0 to 53). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine the post-operative ambulatory status, time to clinical and radiological union and post-fixation complications such as implant failure and need for second surgery. . The predominant fixation method was with an extramedullary device in 23 patients. 25 (75%) patients were placed on wheelchair mobilisation or no weight-bearing initially. The mean time to full weight-bearing was 7.1 months (2.2 to 29.7). The mean time for fracture site pain to cease was 6.2 months (1.2 to 17.1). The mean time to radiological union was 10.0 months (2.2 to 27.5). Implant failure was seen in seven patients (23%, 95 confidence interval (CI) 11.8 to 40.9). Revision surgery was required in ten patients (33%, 95 CI 19.2 to 51.2). A large proportion of the patients required revision surgery and suffered implant failure. This fracture is associated with slow healing and prolonged post-operative immobility. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:658–64

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the immediate post-fixation stability of a distal tibial fracture fixed with an intramedullary nail using a biomechanical model. This was used as a surrogate for immediate weight-bearing postoperatively. The goal was to help inform postoperative protocols. Methods. A biomechanical model of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures was created using a fourth-generation composite bone model. Three fracture patterns were tested: spiral, oblique, and multifragmented. Each fracture extended to within 4 cm to 5 cm of the plafond. The models were nearly-anatomically reduced and stabilized with an intramedullary nail and three distal locking screws. Cyclic loading was performed to simulate normal gait. Loading was completed in compression at 3,000 N at 1 Hz for a total of 70,000 cycles. Displacement (shortening, coronal and sagittal angulation) was measured at regular intervals. Results. The spiral and oblique fracture patterns withstood simulated weight-bearing with minimal displacement. The multifragmented model had early implant failure with breaking of the distal locking screws. The spiral fracture model shortened by a mean of 0.3 mm (SD 0.2), and developed a mean coronal angulation of 2.0° (SD 1.9°) and a mean sagittal angulation of 1.2° (SD 1.1°). On average, 88% of the shortening, 74% of the change in coronal alignment, and 75% of the change in sagittal alignment occurred in the first 2,500 cycles. No late acceleration of displacement was noted. The oblique fracture model shortened by a mean of 0.2 mm (SD 0.1) and developed a mean coronal angulation of 2.4° (SD 1.6°) and a mean sagittal angulation of 2.6° (SD 1.4°). On average, 44% of the shortening, 39% of the change in coronal alignment, and 79% of the change in sagittal alignment occurred in the first 2,500 cycles. No late acceleration of displacement was noted. Conclusion. For spiral and oblique fracture patterns, simulated weight-bearing resulted in a clinically acceptable degree of displacement. Most displacement occurred early in the test period, and the rate of displacement decreased over time. Based on this model, we offer evidence that early weight-bearing appears safe for well reduced oblique and spiral fractures, but not in multifragmented patterns that have poor bone contact. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):294–298

Management of highly displaced acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remain contentious. It is unclear if delayed versus acute reconstruction has an increased risk of fixation failure and complications. The primary aim of this was to compare complications of early versus delayed reconstruction. The secondary aim was to determine modes of failure of ACJ reconstruction requiring revision surgery. A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent operative reconstruction of ACJ injuries over a 10-year period (Rockwood III-V). Reconstruction was classed as early (<12 weeks from injury) or delayed (≥12 weeks). Patient demographics, fixation method and post-operative complications were noted, with one-year follow-up a minimum requirement for inclusion. Fixation failure was defined as loss of reduction requiring revision surgery. 104 patients were analysed (n=60 early and n=44 delayed). Mean age was 42.0 (SD 11.2, 17–70 years), 84.6% male and 16/104 were smokers. No difference was observed between fixation failure (p=0.39) or deep infection (p=0.13) with regards to acute versus delayed reconstruction. No patient demographic or timing of surgery was predictive of fixation failure on regression modelling. Overall, eleven patients underwent revision surgery for loss of reduction and implant failure (n=5 suture fatigue, n=2 endo-button escape, n=2 coracoid stress fracture and n=2 deep infection). This study suggests that delayed ACJ reconstruction does not have a higher incidence of fixation failure or major complications compared to acute reconstruction. For those patients with ongoing pain and instability following a trial of non-operative treatment, delayed reconstruction would appear to be a safe treatment approach

Introduction. The Precice nail is the latest intramedullary lengthening nail with excellent early outcomes. Implant complications have led to modification of the nail design. The aim of this study was to perform a retrieval study of Precice nails following lower limb lengthening. To assess macroscopic and microscopic changes to the implants and assess differences following design modification, with identification of potential surgical, implant and patient risk factors. Method. 15 nails were retrieved from 13 patients following lower limb lengthening. Macroscopic and microscopic surface damage to the nails were identified. Further analysis included radiology and micro-CT prior to sectioning. The internal mechanism was then analysed with Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy to identify corrosion. Results. 7 male and 3 females underwent 12 femoral lengthenings, 9 antegrade and 3 retrograde. 3 females underwent tibial lengthening. All patients obtained the desired length with no implant failure and full regenerate consolidation. Surface degradation was noted on the telescopic part of every nail design, less on the latest implants. Microscopic analysis confirmed fretting and pitting corrosion. Following sectioning black debris was noted in all implants. The early designs were found to have fractured actuator pins and the pin and bearings had evidence of corrosive debris. The latest designs had evidence of biological deposits suggestive of fluid ingress within the nail. Conclusion. This study suggests fluid ingress occurs with every generation of Precice nail despite modifications. The presence of biological fluid could be an early warning sign of potential corrosion. This in theory could lead to actuator pin fracture and implant failure. The clinical relevance is the potential re-use of a “dormant” nail in patients requiring secondary limb segment lengthening. Retraction of the nail in-situ and re-use for further lengthening requires careful consent for potential implant failure

MOXIMED KineSpring® Knee Implant System is an Orthopaedic device designed for younger or highly active patients with osteoarthritis. The device is placed under the skin, is attached to the tibia and femur, and contains springs which help limit some of the forces that are transmitted through the knee during activities such as walking or running and thereby relieve pain that may be experienced by patients with early arthritis of the knee. The aim of this study is to determine the long term safety and efficacy of the KineSpring knee implant system. This is a prospective case series involving two centres in Glasgow. 29 patients (mean age of 45.1 years and range 18-65 years) were recruited into the study between 2011 and 2016. The Primary outcome measure was Oxford knee score (OKS) at 2, 5 and 10 years post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures include device related complications and survival, patient reported functional outcome measures, patient satisfaction, pain levels and change in radiographic classification of osteoarthritis. At 2-year follow-up, 7 implants were removed (74.1% survival). Complications include deep infection, requiring removal in 1 patient, 2 implant failures requiring removal and one spring breakage. In comparison to pre-operative measures there was an improvement in the pain (3.58 vs. 5.20, p=0.02), stiffness (4.16 vs. 4.47, p=0.6) and OKS (32.4 vs. 36.9, p=0.03). The KineSpring improves overall pain, stiffness and functional outcome at 2 years following surgery, however there was a high rate of removal and further long-term follow up analysis is required regarding its effectiveness

Aims

Several previously identified patient-, injury-, and treatment-related factors are associated with the development of nonunion in distal femur fractures. However, the predictive value of these factors is not well defined. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of previously identified risk factors in the development of nonunion leading to secondary surgery in distal femur fractures.

Hip fracture treatment strategies continue to evolve with the goal of restoring hip fracture victims to Pre-injury Functional levels. Strategies for improved treatment have focused on fracture exposure, reduction, provisional fixation and definitive fixation with implant designs optimised for fracture union with minimal implant failure as originally proposed by Lambotte. Multiple implant designs have been conceived based on perceived inadequacies of previous generational designs. To better understand this evolutionary process, it is necessary to review the predecessors of modern fracture treatment and understand their design concepts and results. It is interesting that the modern era of surgical treatment of hip fractures actually began in 1902, when Dr Royal Whitman advocated the necessity of a closed reduction of adult hip fractures under general anesthesia and stabilisation by hip spica cast. Dr Whitman predicted the evolution of stabilisation by internal fixation and commented on this in his 1932 JBJS editorial emphasising the importance of surgical treatment of fractures. Dr Smith-Peterson, also from New York, in 1925 developed the 1st commercially successful hip implant, a tri–flanged nail. These first surgeries were performed with an open reduction, through a Smith-Petersen approach without radiographic control. This nail device was rapidly modified in the 1930's to permit insertion over a guide wire with a radiographic controlled insertion technique, a minimally invasive procedure. Nail penetration and implant failure in pertrochanteric fractures led to the rapid development of side-plates and a refocus on reduction stability. This led to a period of primary corrective osteotomies for enhanced stability, but fell out of failure after the sliding hip screw concept took hold. Originally conceived by Godoy-Moreira and Pohl independently in the 1940s, it became rapidly accepted as a method to avoid nail penetration and implant failure, unfortunately at the expense of accepting malunion and collapse of the fracture. Even the importance of rotational stability was discarded as insignificant by Holt in 1963. The concept of reduction of the Antero-Medial cortex was forgotten in favour of the Tip-apex distance as the only important variable in reduction to avoid implant cut-out. The concept of malunion of pertrochanteric fractures was simply deleted from consideration with disregard for the possible association of impaired functional recovery. Several recent papers that improved functional recovery is possible when these new implants are coupled with successful reduction strategies. Further studies are needed to identify the correct choice of implant for the appropriate fracture configuration, which may lead to a revision of our current fracture classification systems and our concepts of stability

Aims

Proximal femur fractures treatment can involve anterograde nailing with a single or double cephalic screw. An undesirable failure for this fixation is screw cut-out. In a single-screw nail, a tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm has been associated with an increased risk of cut-out. The aim of the study was to examine the role of TAD as a risk factor in a cephalic double-screw nail.

Aims

To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compares three treatments for acetabular fractures in older patients: surgical fixation, surgical fixation and hip arthroplasty (fix-and-replace), and non-surgical treatment.

We performed a randomised, prospective trial to evaluate the use of unreamed titanium nails for femoral fractures. Of 48 patients with 50 femoral fractures 45 were followed to union; 23 with an unreamed and 22 with a reamed nail. The study was stopped early because of a high rate of implant failure. The fractures in the unreamed group were slower to unite (39.4 weeks) than those in the reamed group (28.5 weeks; p = 0.007). The time to union was over nine months in 57% of the unreamed group and in 18% of the reamed group. In the unreamed group 14 secondary procedures were required in ten patients to enhance healing compared with three in three patients in the reamed group. Six implants (13%) failed, three in each group. Four of these six fractures showed evidence of delayed union. To achieve quicker union and fewer implant failures we recommend the use of reamed nails of at least 12 mm in diameter for female patients and 13 mm in males

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability.

Background:. Segmental defects of long bones are notoriously demanding and difficult to treat. We evaluate nine cases where the Masquelet induced membrane technique to substitute bone loss has been used. We discuss the method compared to other types of bone reconstruction and share our tips and tricks to reduce treatment time and improve patient comfort. Method:. Eight patients (nine injuries) operated between 2011 and 2014 were included. Four were infected. Outcome was time-to weight-bearing, consolidation, complications, bone grafting. Results:. All patients were weight bearing fully after 270 days. Mean time to weight bearing was 225 days. Time to full weight bearing was shorter in patients where nails were used to stabilize the construct: median 115 (range 0–268) compared to plates: median 244 (range 219–271). All but two cases went on to full consolidation. Three cases needed grafting, one was misaligned. There were no amputations, no persistent infections, and no implant failures. Discussion:. The induced membrane technique is a relevant alternative to traditional bone substitution in select cases, yet somewhat unpredictable in its course and prolonged immobilisation is often required. Conclusion:. Nailing seems to improve the outcome by reducing treatment time and volume of bone graft needed and should be considered when feasible

Introduction. Proximal humeral shaft fractures are rare injury. In such case, to the best of our knowledge, the treatment by both double-plate method and the MIPO has never been seen before in the literature. Here we report our experience and management about this method. Materials & Methods. A 69-year-old man who suffered falling down at home to his right shoulder that resulted in co-existing fractures of the proximal humerus and humeral shaft. According to AO/ASIF classification, he had 11-B1 and 12-A1 fractures ipsilaterally. He was treated by double plate method with PHILOS (SYNTHES, Japan) to proximal humerus and narrow LC-LCP(SYNTHES, Japan) to humeral shaft. Intraoperatively we put the skin incision about 3.0 cm each in three places, for reduction and fixation by the MIPO. Postoperatively, external fixation was only sling and physiotherapy was initiated after third post-operative days for range of motion exercises. Results. Union was achieved after 3.0 months and, at follow-up 1 year after injury, he had no pain and a good range of shoulder movement. Constant-Murley score was 90 points. Also he had no complication such as avascular necrosis and implant failure. Discussion & Conclusion. In this case, less invasive and rigid fixation by this method could result in early mobilization of the shoulder, relatively early union and a good functional outcome. Double-plate method with the MIPO might be one valid option in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures

Introduction. Sacral fractures were previously treated with transiliac bars, sacroiliac screws or posterior plates. Sacroiliac screws are not as invasive, but the risk of intra-operative neurovascular damage must be considered. Posterior plate fixation is slightly invasive. In 2006, we conceived a new fixation method with spinal instrumentation system, and I will introduce it. Procedure. We make 5cm skin incisions just above each side of post. sup. spine of ilium and make a tunnel under the soft tissue. Then, we insert 4 screws to ilium, pass two rods through the tunnel and fix them. If needed we make reduction or compression. Finally, set the transvers connecting device on both sides. Material and Method. We indicate this method for type C1 and C2 sacral fracture on AO classification. We treated 17 cases, C1 for 6 and C2 for 11 cases. We evaluated clinically and radiologically. Result. Mean operating time was 105 minutes, and mean hemorrhage was 125ml. We had 2 miss-directional insertions of screws out of 68 screws. We had 3 cases that complained of irritation pain around screw heads. No surgical site infection and no soft tissue necrosis. On radiological evaluation, we had no cases of correction loss, nonunion or implant failure. Conclusion. The advantages of our method are (1)easy and safety procedure, (2) high compatibility, (3)soft tissue protection, (4)stiffness of fixation, and (5)intraoperative manipulation, such as reduction or compression

Introduction. The Kaplan Meier estimator is widely used in orthopedics. In situations where another event prevents the occurrence of the event of interest, the Kaplan Meier estimator is not appropriate and a competing risks model has to be applied. We questioned how much bias is introduced by erroneous use of the Kaplan Meier estimator instead of a competing risks model in a hip revision surgery cohort. Methods. In our previously published cohort study, 62 acetabular revisions (58 patients) were performed between January 1979 and March 1986. Twenty to twenty-five years after surgery, no patients were lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients underwent revision surgery. During the 20 to 25 years follow-up, 30 patients (33 acetabular revisions) died of causes unrelated to their hip surgery. Results. In the data set analyzed, the Kaplan Meier method overestimates the probability of implant failure by 6.7%, 13.8%,26.8%,48.6% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years respectively. Discussion. We have performed two different analyses for a hip revision surgery cohort and discussed the use of a competing risks model. Ignoring competing risks leads to biased estimations of the probability of having future revision surgery. Therefore we recommended the use of a competing risks model whenever there are competing risks present

Background. Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures pose many complexities. This study assessed the outcomes of distal tibial fractures treated with percutaneously inserted medial locking plates. Methods. Eighteen patients were selected based on the fracture pattern and classified using the AO classification and stabilised with an AO medial tibial locking plate. Time to fracture union, complications and outcomes were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score at 12 months. Results. Sixteen of the 18 patients achieved fracture union, with 1 patient lost to follow up. Twelve fractures united within 24 weeks, with an average union time of 23.1 weeks. Three delayed unions, two at 28 weeks and one at 56 weeks. The average time to union was 32 weeks in the smokers and 15.3 weeks in the non-smokers. Five of the 18 patients (27%) developed complications. One superficial wound infection and one chronic wound infection, resulting in non-union at 56 weeks, requiring revision. Two patients required plate removal, one after sustaining an open fracture at the proximal end of the plate 6 months after surgery (post fracture union) and the other for painful hardware. One patient had implant failure of three proximal diaphyseal locking screws at the screw head/neck junction, but successful fracture union. The average AOFAS ankle score was 88.8 overall, and 92.1 in fractures that united within 24 weeks. Conclusions. Distal tibial locking plates have high fracture union rates, minimum soft tissue complications, and good functional outcomes. The literature shows similar fracture union and complication rates in locking and non-locking plates

British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) Guidelines recommend clinical and radiological follow-up after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) at 1 year, 5 years and every 5 years thereafter to detect asymptomatic failure. To evaluate the importance of routine follow-up appointments (OPAs) in detecting failing implants the presentation of patients undergoing revision THA was reviewed. 176 patients who received 183 first-time revision THAs over a seven-year period (2003-2010) were identified from an arthroplasty database. A preliminary study sampled 46 THAs in 45 patients. Retrospective chart review recorded symptoms and mode of presentation. Follow-up OPA costs were calculated to estimate savings. All patients had symptoms at the time of revision (pain 96%, decreased mobility 76%, limp 35%, stiffness 26%, night pain 24%). Route of presentation was 80% new referrals (GP 63%, in-patient 9%, A&E 4%, Rheumatology 4%) vs 20% routine orthopaedic follow-up. The minimum cost for a routine follow-up OPA was £35. Assuming discharge after the earliest review when the patient has returned to full normal activities the estimated saving for the 2009 cohort of 377 primary THAs performed in our hospital is £13195 at 1 year and £52780 over the lifespan of the implants (assuming average 15 year survival). Following uncomplicated primary cemented THA in our hospital asymptomatic implant failure is unlikely. Symptomatic patients tend to present mainly to their GP and other specialities, rather than orthopaedic follow-up OPAs. Early discharge after return to full normal activities would be safe and lead to significant financial savings

We performed a randomised, prospective trial in 111 patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the hip comparing the use of the Gotfried percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) with that of the classic hip screw (CHS). Blood loss and transfusion requirement were less in the PCCP group but the operating time was significantly longer. The complication rate after operation was similar in both groups, and at a minimum follow-up of six months there was no difference in the rates of fracture healing or implant failure. The PCCP gives results which are similar to those obtained with a conventional device. Its suggested advantages seem to be theoretical rather than practical and, being a fixed-angle implant, it is not universally applicable

Background. Second-generation high-carbon CoCrMo-alloy metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) was introduced in the late 1980s following reports of early loosening, impingement, pronounced wear, and hypersensitivity in the first-generation metal-on-metal articulations. There has been inconsistent data that specifically addresses the clinical performance and longevity of second-generation metal-on-metal THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of second-generation metal-on-metal primary THA and to assess the influence of demographic factors on implant survival in a large patient cohort. Methods. One thousand two hundred and seventy second-generation 28 mm metal-on-metal primary THA in 1121 patients were performed at one institution from 1994 to 2004. According to the International Documentation and Evaluation System patients were followed routinely at one year, two years and every five years thereafter. Clinical and radiographic outcome data was prospectively recorded using a hospital joint registry. At a mean follow-up of 6.8 years postoperatively, the probability of survival of THA was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Relative risk factors for implant failure that included age, gender, BMI, type of implant fixation and size of implant components were calculated using the Cox proportional-hazards model. Results. Sixty three (5%) hips were revised because of aseptic loosening (28 hips), infection (8 hips), periprosthetic fracture (8 hips), recurrent dislocation (8 hips), pain without implant loosening (7 hips) and breakage of the cup (4 hips). The probability of survival at ten years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, for the THA as a whole was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.94). The probability of survival for the cup was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.93) and for the stem 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 0.97). No demographic factors or covariates were found to significantly affect survivorship. Conclusion. Second-generation metal-on-metal primary THA did not demonstrate a superior probability of survival at ten years compared with previous reports on other weight-bearing surfaces. Based on these findings and with consideration of concerns that relate to putative local and systemic toxicity of metal debris, the use of second-generation metal-on-metal articulations for primary THA remains moot