Aims. The principle strategies of fracture-related infection (FRI) treatment are debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention (DAIR) or debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant removal/exchange. Increasing the period between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery is believed to be associated with higher failure rates after DAIR. However, a clear time-related cut-off has never been scientifically defined. This systematic review analyzed the influence of the interval between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery on success rates after DAIR. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, investigating the outcome after DAIR procedures of long bone FRIs in clinical studies published until January 2020. Results. Six studies, comprising 276 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Data from this review showed that with a short duration of infection (up to three weeks) and under strict preconditions, retention of the implant is associated with high success rates of 86% to 100%. In delayed infections with a fracture fixation-FRI revision surgery interval of three to ten weeks, absence of recurrent infection was reported in 82% to 89%. Data on late FRIs, with a fracture fixation-FRI revision surgery interval of more than ten weeks, are scarce and a success rate of 67% was reported. Conclusion. Acute/early FRI, with a short duration of infection, can successfully be treated with DAIR up to ten weeks after osteosynthesis. The limited available data suggest that chronic/late onset FRI treated with DAIR may be associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Successful outcome is dependent on managing all aspects of the infection. Thus, time from fracture fixation is not the only factor that should be considered in treatment planning of FRI. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, these conclusions have to be interpreted with caution. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):213–221

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a complex challenge in orthopaedic surgery associated with substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) protocol is a viable treatment, offering several advantages over exchange arthroplasty. With the evolution of treatment strategies, considerable efforts have been directed towards enhancing the efficacy of DAIR, including the development of a phased debridement protocol for acute PJI management. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DAIR, presenting the outcomes of single-stage, two-stage, and repeated DAIR procedures. It delves into the challenges faced, including patient heterogeneity, pathogen identification, variability in surgical techniques, and antibiotics selection. Moreover, critical factors that influence the decision-making process between single- and two-stage DAIR protocols are addressed, including team composition, timing of the intervention, antibiotic regimens, and both anatomical and implant-related considerations. By providing a comprehensive overview of DAIR protocols and their clinical implications, this annotation aims to elucidate the advancements, challenges, and potential future directions in the application of DAIR for PJI management. It is intended to equip clinicians with the insights required to effectively navigate the complexities of implementing DAIR strategies, thereby facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1377–1384.

Aims

To analyse the effectiveness of debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in patients with hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the relationship to patient characteristics. The outcome was evaluated in hips with confirmed PJI and a follow-up of not less than two years.

Aim. Debridement, Antibiotics, Irrigation, and implant Retention (DAIR) is a surgical treatment protocol suitable for some patients with fracture related infection (FRI). Clinically relevant pre-clinical models of DAIR are scarce and none have been developed in large animals. Therefore, this project aimed to develop a large animal model for FRI including a DAIR approach and compare outcomes after 2 or 5 weeks of infection. Method. Swiss Alpine sheep (n=8), (2–6 years, 50–80 kg) were included in this study. This study was approved by cantonal Ethical authorities in Chur, Switzerland. A 2 mm osteotomy was created in the tibia and fixed with a 10-hole 5.5 mm steel plate. Subsequently, 2.5 mL of saline solution containing 10. 6. CFU/mL of Staphylococcus aureus MSSA (ATCC 25923) was added over the plate. Sheep were observed for 2 (n=3) or 5 weeks (n=5) until revision surgery, during which visibly infected or necrotic tissues were removed, and the wound flushed with saline. All samples were collected for bacterial quantification. After revision surgery, the sheep were treated systemically for 2 weeks with flucloxacillin and for 4 weeks with rifampicin and cotrimoxazole. After 2 further weeks off antibiotics, the animals were euthanized. Bacteriological culture was performed at the end of the study. Bone cores were isolated from the osteotomy site and processed for Giemsa & Eosin and Brown and Brenn staining. A radiographical examination was performed every second week. Results. Bacteriological evaluation of the retrieved samples during revision surgery showed no significant difference between the 2 vs 5 weeks infection periods in term of total CFU counts. At the end of the study, radiographical examination showed callus formation over the osteotomy site in both groups, although the osteotomy was not completely healed in either group. At euthanasia, the 2 weeks infection group showed a higher soft tissue burden compared to the 5 weeks group, whereby the infection in the 5 weeks group was primarily located in the bone and bone marrow. Conclusions. The large animal model of FRI and DAIR was successfully established. Bacteriological outcomes highlight that the increasing duration of the infection does not change the outcome but the location of the infection from a predominantly soft tissue infection to a deeper bone and intramedullary (IM) channel infection. The debridement of the IM channel could potentially reduce the infection burden by eliminating those bacteria not easily reached by systemic antibiotics, though is not practical using conventional techniques

Abstract. Background. Infections are rare and poorly studied complications of unicompartmental knee athroplasty (UKA) surgery. They are significantly less common compared to infections after total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Optimal management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after a UKA is not clearly defined in the literature. We present the results of a multicentre retrospective series of UKA PJIs treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR). Methodology. Patients presenting between January 2016 and December 2019 with early UKA infection were identified at three specialist centres using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. All patients underwent a standardized treatment protocol consisting of the DAIR procedure and antibiotic therapy comprising two weeks of intravenous (IV) antibiotics followed by six weeks of oral therapy. The main outcome measure was overall survivorship free from reoperation for infection. Results. A total of 3225 UKAs (2793 (86.2%) medial and 432 (13.8%) lateral UKAs) were performed between January 2016 and December 2019. Nineteen patients had early infections necessitating DAIR. The mean follow-up period was 32.5 months. DAIR showed an overall survivorship free from septic reoperation of 84.2%, with an overall survivorship free from all-cause reoperation of 78.95%. The most common bacteria were Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Group B Streptococci. Three patients required a second DAIR procedure but remained free from re-infection at follow-up obviating the need for more demanding, staged revision surgery. Conclusions. In infected UKAs, the DAIR procedure produces a high rate of success, with a high survivorship of the implant

Aims

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is commonly classified based on the time of onset of symptoms. Early infections (< two weeks) are treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). For late infections (> ten weeks), guidelines recommend implant removal due to tolerant biofilms. For delayed infections (two to ten weeks), recommendations are unclear. In this study we compared infection clearance and bone healing in early and delayed FRI treated with DAIR in a rabbit model.

Aims. Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) is a severe complication caused by microbial infection of bone. It is imperative to gain more insight into the potentials and limitations of Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) to improve future FRI treatment. The aims of this study were to: 1) determine how time to surgery affects the success rate of DAIR procedures of the lower leg performed within 12 weeks after the initial fracture fixation operation and 2) evaluate whether appropriate systemic antimicrobial therapy affects the success rate of a DAIR procedure. Methods. This multinational retrospective cohort study included patients of at least 18-years of age who developed an FRI of the lower leg within 12 weeks after the initial fracture fixation operation, between January 1st 2015 to July 1st 2020. DAIR success was defined by the absence of recurrence of infection, preservation of the affected limb and retention of implants during the initial treatment. The antimicrobial regimen was considered appropriate if the pathogen(s) was susceptible to the given treatment at the correct dose as per guideline. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess factors that could contribute to the DAIR success rate. Results. A total of 120 patients were included, of whom 70 DAIR patients and 50 non-DAIR patients. Within a median follow-up of 35.5 months, 21.4% of DAIR patients developed a recurrent FRI compared to 12.0% of non-DAIR patients. The DAIR procedure was successful in 45 patients (64.3%). According to the Willenegger and Roth classification, DAIR success was achieved in 66.7% (n=16/24) of patients with an early infection (<2 weeks), 64.4% (n=29/45) of patients with a delayed infection (2–10 weeks) and 0.0% (0/1) of patients with a late infection (>10 weeks). Univariate analysis showed that the duration of infection was not associated with DAIR success in this cohort (p=0.136; OR: 0.977; 95%CI: [0.947–1.007]). However, an appropriate antimicrobial regimen was associated with success of DAIR (p=0.029; OR: 3.231; 95%CI: [1.138–9.506]). Conclusions. Although the results should be interpreted with caution, an increased duration of infection was not associated with a decreased success rate of a DAIR procedure in patients with FRI of the lower leg. The results of this study highlight the multifactorial contribution to the success of a DAIR procedure and emphasize the importance of adequate antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, time to surgery should not be the only key-factor when considering a DAIR procedure to treat FRI

Abstract. Introduction. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common cause of revision total knee surgery. Although debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has lower success rates in the chronic setting, it is an accepted treatment for acute PJI. There are two broad DAIR strategies: single debridement or a planned double debridement performed days apart. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single versus double DAIR with antibiotic beads for acute PJI in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methodology. A decision tree using single or double DAIR as treatment strategies for acute PJI was constructed. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs associated with the two treatment arms were calculated. Treatment success rates, failure rates, and mortality rates were derived from the literature. Medical costs were derived from both the literature and Medicare data. A cost-effectiveness plane was constructed from multiple Monte Carlo trials. A sensitivity analysis identified parameters most influencing the optimal strategy decision. Results. Double DAIR with antibiotic beads was the optimal treatment strategy both in terms of the health utility state (82% of trials), and medical cost (97% of trials). Strategy tables demonstrated that as long as the success rate of double debridement is 10% or greater than the success rate of a single debridement, the two-stage protocol is cost-effective. Conclusions. This Markov analysis demonstrates that in the setting of acute PJI following TKA, a double DAIR with antibiotic beads is more cost effective than single DAIR from a societal perspective

OBJECTIVE. Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure is well established for Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) in acute setting after total hip and knee replacements. We present our perspective of DAIR in a relatively a small cohort following hip and knee replacements in a District General Hospital (DGH) in United Kingdom, where we delivered comparable results to leading tertiary centers in short to mid-term followup. METHODS. We undertook a retrospective study involving 14 patients, who underwent DAIR in our DGH between August 2012 and December 2015. Patient cohort included primary, complex primary and revision hip and knee replacements. Multiple samples were taken intraoperatively for cultures and histology. mMicrobiological support was provided by a microbiologist with interest in musculoskeletal infections. RESULTS. 14 patients [9 males, 5 females; age 62–78 years (Mean 70.7); BMI 22–44.2 (Mean 33.8)] with multiple comorbidities underwent DAIR procedure within 3 weeks of onset of symptoms, (although the time from index surgery ranged from 15 days to 58 months). Patient selection was made by two Hip surgeons. 12 out of 14 grew positive cultures with two growing Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus. IV antibiotics were stated after samples intraoperatively and continued in six patients after discharge using (OPAT), while 8 were discharged with oral antibiotics. One patient died in immediate post operative period due to generalised sepsis. Another patient died of myocardial infarction 2 years after DAIR. 12 (85.7%) patients are doing well with regular followup (Mean 20 months) in clinics. CONCLUSIONS. With good patient selection, DAIR is a far simpler solution and a safe and reproducible surgical option in PJI in hip and knee replacements compared to one or two stage revisions with the implications. But published Data in contemporary literature is predominantly from specialized centers. Our small series provides a perspective of early to mid term results of DAIR from a DGH

Aim. Debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is a valuable option for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), provided that the criteria of the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines are fulfilled. The inflammation caused by infection and the surgical impact of DAIR may influence implant stability. In this study, we investigated the sequelae of DAIR on implant survival after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. THAs from our database implanted between 1984 and 2016 were included in a retrospective double-cohort study. THAs were exposed (DAIR cohort) or not exposed to DAIR (control cohort). The control cohort comprised patients matched 3:1 to the DAIR cohort. The outcome—implant failure over time—was evaluated for (i) revision for any reason, (ii) aseptic loosening of any component, and (iii) radiographic evidence of loosening. Results. Fifty-seven THAs (56 patients) were included in the DAIR cohort and 170 THAs (168 patients) in the control cohort. The mean follow-up periods in the DAIR and control cohorts were 6.1 (SD 4.7) and 7.8 (SD 5.5) years, respectively. During follow-up, 20 (36%) patients in the DAIR cohort and 54 (32%) in the control cohort died after a mean of 4.1 (SD 4.7) and 7.2 (SD 5.4) years, respectively. Revision for any reason was performed in 9 (16%) DAIR THAs and 10 (6%) control THAs (p = 0.03) and for aseptic loosening of any component in 5 (9%) DAIR THAs and 8 (5%, p = 0.32) control THAs, respectively. Radiological analysis included 56 DAIR THAs and 168 control THAs. Two (4%) stems and 2 (4%) cups in the DAIR cohort and 7 (4%) and 1 (0.6%) in the control cohort, respectively, demonstrated radiological signs of failure (p = 1). Conclusions. THAs exposed to DAIR were revised for any reason more frequently than were THAs in the control cohort. The difference in revisions for aseptic loosening was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in radiographic evidence of loosening of any component between cohorts

Introduction. We aim to evaluate the outcome of debridement and implant retention (DAIR) procedures performed for primary total hip prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and to identify factors correlating with a successful outcome. Methods. Patients were identified from theatre records. Electronic and paper notes were reviewed. Results. Fifty-four DAIR procedures for infected, elective, primary total hip replacements were performed between 2010 and 2017. Complete records were available for 44 procedures. There were 22 males and 22 females. Mean age was 71 (38–89) years. Mean follow-up was 21.6 (2–52) months. Ninety-one percent of DAIRs were performed for exogenous infections. Procedures were performed on average 23 days from the primary procedure in exogenous infections and 11 days from onset of symptoms in haematogenous infections. Nine of 40 cases for exogenous infection were performed more than 28 days from the primary procedure. The procedure resulted in a successful outcome in 34 cases (77%). There was no significant difference in the time to DAIR from the primary procedure comparing successful and unsuccessful cases. A successful outcome was associated with changing the femoral head, the procedure being performed by a revision hip surgeon, not inserting gentamicin impregnated fleece, and positive identification of the infecting organism. Discussion. Prompt treatment with DAIR of suspected primary hip PJI can result in a high rate of successful outcome. The femoral head should always be exchanged and a delay to DAIR is preferable to the procedure being performed by a surgeon who does not routinely perform revision hip surgery

Introduction. Periprosthetic joinTt infection (PJI) remains an uncommon, yet devastating complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) provides an alternative to staged revision. Chronic infection is considered to be a contraindication to DAIR, however, outcomes stratified by chronicity have not been documented. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all DAIR cases performed at our institution between 2008–2015. Timeframe to treatment was categorized as acute (< 6 weeks since surgery), chronic (>6 weeks since surgery) or acute hematogenous (previously well-functioning prosthesis). Treatment failure was defined as reoperation during the first 90-days following DAIR. Univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square; p<0.05) and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used with multiple comparison adjustment by Tukey-Kramer method (α = 0.05). Results. 282 patients underwent DAIR; 52.8% female; 37.6% THA; 62.4% TKR; mean age: 66.6 (+/−12); mean BMI: 30.3 (+/−7). There were 68 acute (24.1%) patients, 64 (22.7%) chronic and 150 (53.2%) acute hematogenous patients. There was no difference in failure rate between THA and TKA (p=0.09). The data demonstrated that DAIR was more likely to fail in acute (45.6%) compared to chronic (20.3%) or acute hematogenous (25.3%) (OR=4.05; 95 % CI: 2.25 – 7.3, p<0.0001). Staph aureus was the causative organism in 47.1% acute, 18.8% chronic and 28% acute hematogenous. Microbial diagnosis influenced the effect of DAIR results; staph aureus independently increased the failure rate for acute (OR=4.17; 95% CI:1.3–14.3; p=0.02) and chronic (OR=5.89; 95%CI: 1.6–20.0; p=0.01) but not acute hematogenous (OR=1.96; 95% CI: 0.88–4.38; p=0.096). Discussion. 90-day failure of DAIR was higher in the acute compared to chronic or acute hematogenous infection groups. Infection with staph aureus conferred a higher risk of failure for acute and chronic but not for acute hematogenous. DAIR may be more efficacious in chronic PJI than previously considered, particularly for non-staph aureus cases

INTRODUCTION. Deep infection is a potentially catastrophic complication of joint replacement surgery. Early intervention in suspected prosthetic joint infection in the form of aggressive Debridement and targeted Antibiotics can lead to successful Implant Retention (DAIR). In our centre, we adopt an aggressive approach to suspected prosthetic joint infection, working in a multi-disciplinary team with microbiologists and an infection surveillance team to identify and treat suspected infected cases at the earliest opportunity. OBJECTIVES. To evaluate the efficacy of the treatment of prosthetic joint infection with DAIR. METHODS. All cases of primary prosthetic joint infection between March 2009 and September 2011 were identified. Data was retrospectively collected from root cause analysis data, patient records and hospital electronic results systems. RESULTS. 48 cases of confirmed deep infection were identified from a total of 5037 primary joint replacements. Mean age was 67.3. The mean time between index procedure and return to theatre for debridement was 18 days. 10 patients underwent a second debridement and 3 returned to theatre for a third debridement. Mean total duration of antibiotic treatment was 10.5 weeks with mean duration of intravenous antibiotics 2.7 weeks. There were two early and three late failures on antibiotics. These went on to have successful two stage revision. The mean interval to debridement in failed cases was 15 days. The primary implant was successfully retained in 90% of cases (n=43) at a mean follow up of 30 months. CONCLUSION. DAIR is an effective means of treating early prosthetic joint infection in a multi-disciplinary setting

Introduction. Success rate after Debridement-Irrigation, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) for treatment of Acute Haematogenous (AH) and Early Post-surgical (EP) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) varies widely among published studies. Prosthesis exchange is recommended to treat PJI after a failed DAIR. However, no early postoperative prognostic factors permitting to identify future failures have been described. Aim. Identify early prognostic factor of failure after DAIR in order to propose efficient treatment before onset of chronic PJI. Hypothesis. Positive suction drainage fluid culture is a strong early predictive factor of failure. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study, with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Twenty-two consecutive patients (78 years-old +/-10) with EPPJI: i.e. infection within 1 month after joint replacement (n=12; 55%) or AHPJI: i.e. acute haematogenous infection with less than 2 weeks evolution (n=10; 45%) were included. The involved prostheses were: Total Knee Arthroplasty (n=12; 55%), Total Hip Arthroplasty (n=7; 32%) and Hip Hemi-Arthroplasty (n=3; 14%). DAIR was indicated for each patient. Suction drainage fluid was systematically analysed at day 1, 3 and 5 postoperative. Failure of the procedure was defined as: need for iterative surgery to control PJI or suppressive antibiotherapy to control PJI or death related to PJI. Results. At 2 years follow-up, failure rate after DAIR was 55%. Only positive suction drainage fluid culture was statistically associated with treatment failure (p=0,039). Neither type of prosthesis: knee prosthesis vs hip prosthesis (Odds Ratio (OR)=1; IC95%[0.14; 7.21]) nor type of fixation : cemented vs uncemented prothesis (OR=4,39; IC95%[0.29; 269]) were associated with treatment failure. In addition, type of bacteria causing PJI and especially S. aureus (OR=3,1; IC95%[0.42; 28.61]), type of infection (OR= 1,47; IC95%[0.21; 11.37]), delay between onset of symptoms and DAIR (OR= 1,63; IC95% [0.21; 14.85]) or retaining of modular component (OR= 1.32; IC95% [0.17; 10.59)) were not associated with a higher rate of failure. Conclusion. Positive suction drainage fluid culture could be an early postoperative predictive factor of failure after open Irrigation-Debridement, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention for EPPJI and AHPJI

Debridement Antibiotics Implant Retention (DAIR) is a recognised procedure in the management of acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We present an experience of DAIR following hip and knee replacements in a District General Hospital. A retrospective review of 14 patients who underwent DAIR procedures between August 2012 and December 1015 were collated. The cohort included primary, complex primary and revision hip and knee replacements. All patients received multidisciplinary care with surgery performed by one of two arthroplasty surgeons. 9 males and 5 females with age 62 − 78 years (Mean 70.7) and BMI 22–44.2 (Mean 33.8) with various co-morbidities underwent DAIR. Surgical criteria required DAIR to be performed within 3 weeks of the onset of symptoms of infection. The time from index surgery however ranged from 15 days to 58 months. 12 of 14 grew positive cultures including two growing Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus. Intravenous antibiotics were commenced after intraoperative samples and tailored OPAT. Antibiotic schedule varied from six weeks to eight months. 12 (85.7%) patients remain under follow up. Mean follow is 20 months (RANGE 6months-3years10months) with no recurrence of infection or reoperation. With appropriate patient selection, DAIR is safe and reproducible surgical option in PJI in hip and knee replacements, avoiding the implications of a one or two stage revision. Published Data in contemporary literature is predominantly from specialised centres. Our small series provides a perspective of early to mid term results of DAIR to DGH. Interestingly each procedure is categorised as a failed implant on the National Joint Register

Aim. Treatment regimens for fracture-related infection (FRI) often refer to the classification of Willenegger and Roth, which stratifies FRIs based on time of onset of symptoms. The classification includes early (<2 weeks), delayed (2–10 weeks) and late (>10 weeks) infections. Early infections are generally treated with debridement and systemic antibiotics but may not require implant removal. Delayed and late infections, in contrast, are believed to have a mature biofilm on the implant, and therefore, treatment often involves implant removal. This distinction between early and delayed infections has never been established in a controlled clinical or preclinical study. This study tested the hypothesis that early and delayed FRIs respond differently to treatment comprising implant retention. Method. A complete humeral osteotomy in 16 rabbits was fixed with a 7-hole-LCP and inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus. The inoculum size (2×106 colony forming units per inoculum) was previously tested without antibiotic intervention to result in infection of all animals persisting for at least 12 weeks.4 The infection was allowed to develop for either 1 (early group) or 4 (delayed group) weeks (n= 8 per group) after bacterial inoculation. At these time points, treatment involved debridement and irrigation of the wound (no implant removal) and quantitative bacteriological evaluation of the removed materials. Systemic antibiotics were administered according to a common clinical regimen (2 weeks: rifampin + nafcillin, followed by 4 weeks: rifampin + levofloxacin). After an additional one-week antibiotic washout period, animals were euthanized and a quantitative bacteriology of soft tissue, implant (after sonication) and bone was performed. Results. Greater numbers of bacteria were recovered by debridement and irrigation in the early group compared with the delayed group, which may indicate retraction of the infection in the delayed stage. Treatment was successful in both the early and delayed group: all animals in both groups were infection free at euthanasia. Furthermore, all osteotomies had healed, although animals in the delayed group displayed irregular callus formation. Conclusions. In both groups, treatment successfully eradicated the infection, suggesting that, at least in this model, the maturity of the infection does not impact upon treatment success within the first four weeks. Acknowledgements. This work was funded by AOTrauma

Introduction: Standard therapy for orthopedic device infections includes a two-stage exchange and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. In a subgroup of patients, retention of the device seems to be an effective alternative. Methods: In a prospective study we evaluated treatment efþcacy of orthopedic device infections with implant retention. Inclusion criteria were: early manifestation, stable implant, known pathogen, susceptibility of staphylococci to quinolones and rifampin, good condition of soft tissue. Initially, intravenous antimicrobial therapy was given for 2 weeks, followed by oral treatment for 10 weeks (knee prostheses for 6 months). Results: From January 1999 through June 2002, 19 patients were included: hip prosthesis (9), knee prostheses (6) and internal þxation devices (4). Isolated pathogens were: staphylococci (14), streptococci (4), enterococci (1), and Propionibacterium acnes (1). Open debridement with device retention was performed in 13 patients; the remaining 6 patients were treated with antibiotics only. After initial 2-week intravenous therapy, staphylococcal infections were treated with oral ciproßoxacin 750 mg bid + rifampin 450 mg bid, streptococcal and enterococcal infections with oral amoxicillin 750 mg tid and the P. acnes-infection with oral clindamycin 600 mg tid. 12 of 16 patients were followed for at least 24 months. 10 (83%) had no symptoms or signs of infection at follow-up, 2 (17%) had a relapse Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, device retention with antimicrobial treatment for 3–6 months may be an effective approach

Early prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are managed with debridement, implant retention and antibiotics (DAIR). Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for failure after stopping antibiotic treatment. From 1999 to 2013 early PJIs managed with DAIR were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The main variables potentially associated with outcome were gathered and the minimum follow-up was 2 years. Primary endpoint was implant removal or the need of reintroducing antibiotic treatment due to failure. A total of 143 patients met the inclusion criteria. The failure rate after a median (IQR) duration of oral antibiotic treatment of 69 (45–95) days was 11.8%. In 92 cases PJI was due to gram-positive (GP) microorganisms, in 21 due to gram-negatives (GN) and 30 had a polymicrobial infection. In GP infections, combination of rifampin with linezolid, cotrimoxazole or clindamycin was associated with a higher failure rate (27.8%, P=0.026) in comparison to patients receiving a combination of rifampin with levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin (8.3%) or monotherapy with linezolid or cotrimoxazole (0%) (Figure 1). Among patients with a GN infection, the use of fluoroquinolones was associated with a lower failure rate (7.1% vs 37.5%, P=0.044). Duration of antibiotic treatment was not associated with failure. The only factor associated with failure was the oral antibiotic selection, but not the duration of treatment. Linezolid, cotrimoxazole and clindamycin but not levofloxacin serum concentrations are reduced by rifampin; a fact that could explain our findings. Further studies monitoring serum concentration could help to improve the efficacy of these antibiotics when combining with rifampin

Open debridement, irrigation with implant retention and antibiotic treatment (DAIR) is an accepted approach for early prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Our aim was to design a score to predict patients with a higher risk of failure. From 1999 to 2014 early (<90 days) PJIs without signs of loosening of the prosthesis were treated with DAIR and were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The primary end-point was early failure defined as: 1) the need of an unscheduled surgery, 2) death-related infection within the first 60 days after debridement or 3) the need for suppressive antibiotic treatment. A score was built-up according to the logistic regression coefficients of variables available before debridement. A total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (95 cases, 42.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (81 cases, 36.5%). Fifty-two (23.4%) cases failed. Independent predictors of failure were: chronic renal failure (OR:5.92, 95%CI:1.47–23.85), liver cirrhosis (OR:4.46, 95%CI:1.15–17.24), revision surgery (OR:4.34, 95%CI:1.34–14.04) or femoral neck fracture (OR:4.39, 95%CI:1.16–16.62) compared to primary arthroplasty, CRP >11.5 mg/dL (OR:12.308, 95%CI:4.56–33.19), cemented prosthesis (OR:8.71, 95%CI:1.95–38.97) and when all intraoperative cultures were positive (OR:6.30, 95%CI:1.84–21.53). Furthermore, CRP showed a direct relationship with the percentage of positive cultures (Linear equation, R2=0,046, P=0.002) and an inverse association with the time between the debridement and failure (Logarithmic equation, R2=0.179, P=0.003). A score for predicting the risk of failure was done using pre-operative factors (KLIC-score, figure 1) and it ranged between 0–9.5 points. Patients with a score ≤2, >2–3.5, 4–5, >5–6.5 and ≥7 had a failure rate of 4.5%, 19.4%, 55%, 71.4% and 100%, respectively. The KLIC-score was highly predictive of early failure after debridement. In the future, it would be necessary to validate our score using cohorts from other institutions

Aim

Analysis of microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns as well as the clinical outcome of patients who underwent a Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in the early phase following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty of the knee and hip.