Aims

Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs.

Aims

Endoprosthetic reconstruction following distal femur tumour resection has been widely advocated. In this paper, we present the design of an uncemented endoprosthesis system featuring a short, curved stem, with the goal of enhancing long-term survivorship and functional outcomes.

Aims

Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model.

Aims

Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated collars have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening of massive endoprostheses following primary surgery. Limited information exists about their effectiveness in revision surgery. The aim of this study was to radiologically assess osteointegration to HA-coated collars of cemented massive endoprostheses following revision surgery.

Aim. The aim of this study was to analyze our results using a modular endoprosthetic replacement system (MUTARS) for bone tumours of the proximal humerus. Methods. Thirty-nine patients were treated with a MUTARS endoprosthesis of the proximal humerus. Mean follow-up was 38 months (3-138 months). Most operations were necessitated by metastasis (n=30); surgery for a primary tumour (n=9) was less frequent. The Enneking score and the active ranges of motion for shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation were recorded. Complete refixation of the rotator cuff was possible in 23 cases. Radiographs also were obtained. Results. Patient survival was 77% at 2 years and 45% at 11.5 years after surgery. The survival rate of the limb was 90% at 11.5 years. The mean Enneking score was 19 points (range 7-27 points). The mean shoulder flexion was 34 degrees (range 0-90 degrees), abduction 33 degrees (range 0-90 degrees), and external rotation 12 degrees (range 10-50 degrees). Patients with a complete rotator cuff repair showed a significant better range of motion compared to patients with a partial or no repair (p<0.015). No signs of implant loosening were observed on postoperative radiographs. Seven complications occurred, five of them leading to implant revision. At 11.5 years after surgery, the survival rate for the whole cohort without complications was 72%, without revision of the implant 70%. Conclusion. Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS endoprosthesis is a viable treatment option for bone tumours with satisfying results

Aims

We aimed to examine the long-term mechanical survivorship, describe the modes of all-cause failure, and identify risk factors for mechanical failure of all-polyethylene tibial components in endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the use of 3D-printed sacral endoprostheses to reconstruct the pelvic ring and re-establish spinopelvic stability after total en bloc sacrectomy (TES) and to review its outcome.

Aims

Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure in cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions. This paper presents the long-term outcomes of a custom-designed cross-pin fixation construct designed to minimize rotational stress and subsequent aseptic loosening in selected patients. The paper will also examine the long-term survivorship and modes of failure when using this technique.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe, analyze, and compare the survival, functional outcome, and complications of minimally invasive (MI) and non-invasive (NI) lengthening total femoral prostheses.

Aim. The use of megaprostheses for knee reconstruction after distal femur resection in young bone sarcoma patients has become popular since early ′80. The authors reviewed their experience with different distal femur megaprostheses in children. Method. Clinico-radiographic evolution in a consecutive series of 113 children, that had implanted below age 15 (range 6-14) a distal femur megaprosthesis in the period 1984-2007, was analized. A modular implant was used in 97 cases with uncemented femoral stem (three different models along the period). The implant presented fixed-hinge joint in 78 cases while rotating-hinge knee was utilized in 19 cases. In 39 cases the fixed-hinge joint had a tibial component with a polished stem to allow the residual growth of proximal tibia; in two cases a mechanically extendable prosthesis was used. A custom-made noninvasive extendable prosthesis with cemented femoral stem and smooth uncemented tibial stem was used in 15 cases since 2002. Radiological and functional results were analysed and a statistical comparison of implant outcome according different stems was obtained. Results. At a 74 months follow-up (29-294), 72 patients are alive; but 43 of them (60%) had further surgery related to primary implant. Surgical revision rate was 88% (39% for mechanical failure) in long survivors treated before 1995 and 50% (14% with mechanical failure) in more recent cases (p< 0.05). Three long survivors progressed in time to total femur megaprostheses. Five out the 15 cases treated by custom made expandable prostheses were revised before completion of skeletal growth because of implant failure. Conclusion. In limb-salvage for bone sarcoma, megaprostheses are the preferred method to reconstruct distal femur in growing children, but a durable reconstruction is not easy to be achieved. The use of new devices specially addressed to younger patients deserves a serious scientific survey by musculoskeletal oncology community

Aim. To evaluate outcome and complications of knee arthrodesis with a modular prosthetic system (MUTARS(r) Implantcast), as primary and revision implants in musculoskeletal oncology. Method. Between 1975 and 2009, 24 prostheses were used for knee arthrodesis. Nineteen in oncologic cases: 6 osteosarcomas, chondrosarcoma, synovial sarcoma and metastatic carcinoma 3 each, 2 pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), malignant fibrous hystiocitoma and giant cell tumour 1 each. Patients were grouped into: A) primary implants, B) revision implants. Group A included 9 patients: 8 arthrodeses after extra-articular resection with major soft tissue removal, 1 after primary resection following multiple excisions of locally recurrent PVNS. Group B included 15 patients: 12 arthrodeses for infection (5 infected TKAs, 7 infected megaprostheses), 2 for failures of temporary arthodesis with Kuntscher nail and cement, 1 for recurrent chondrosarcoma in previous arthrodesis. Results. Oncologic outcome ata mean follow-up of 6 years (ranging 1 to 26), showed 13 NED (68.4%), 2 NED after treatment of relapse (10.5%), 1 alive with metastases (5.3%), 2 dead with disease (10.5%) and one dead of other disease (5.3%). Complications causing failure were observed in 12 patients (50%): 11 infections at mean of 14 months (6 in arthrodeses as revision for previous infections, 5 in group A), 1 femoral stem breakage at 4.8 years (in group B). Treatment of infections was: amputation in 6, “one stage” in 1, “two stage” with new arthrodesis in 4 (1 subsequently amputated for recurrent infection). The breakage was revised, had further traumatic breakage at 2 years and a second revision. Conclusion. Arthrodesis with modular prosthetic system is indicated after major extra-articular resection or in revisions of severely failed previous reconstructions. High infection rate should be prevented with good soft tissue coverage, by flaps if needed

Aims

Following the resection of an extensive amount of bone in the treatment of a tumour, the residual segment may be insufficient to accept a standard length intramedullary cemented stem. Short-stemmed endoprostheses conceivably have an increased risk of aseptic loosening. Extra-cortical plates have been added to minimise this risk by supplementing fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship of short-stemmed endoprostheses and extra-cortical plates.

Aims. The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However, the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision of previous endoprostheses. Patients and Methods. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database. A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included. The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70 months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm (10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140). Results. The mean residual leg length discrepancy at final follow-up of 15 mm (1 to 35). Two patients developed a deep periprosthetic infection, of whom one required amputation to eradicate the infection; the other required two-stage revision. Implant survival according to Henderson criteria was 86% at two years and 72% at five years. When considering revision for any cause (including revision of the growing prosthesis to a non-growing prosthesis), revision-free implant survival was 75% at two years, but reduced to 55% at five years. Conclusion. Our experience indicates that revision surgery using a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis is a successful option for improving leg length discrepancy and should be considered in patients with significant leg-length discrepancy requiring a revision procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:370–7

Aims

The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary malignant tumour of bone.

We reviewed our initial seven-year experience with a non-invasive extendible prosthesis in 34 children with primary bone tumours. The distal femur was replaced in 25 cases, total femur in five, proximal femur in one and proximal tibia in three. The mean follow-up was 44 months (15 to 86) and 27 patients (79%) remain alive. The prostheses were lengthened by an electromagnetic induction mechanism in an outpatient setting and a mean extension of 32 mm (4 to 80) was achieved without anaesthesia. There were lengthening complications in two children: failed lengthening in one and the formation of scar tissue in the other. Deep infection developed in six patients (18%) and local recurrence in three. A total of 11 patients required further surgery to the leg. Amputation was necessary in five patients (20%) and a two-stage revision in another. There were no cases of loosening, but two patients had implant breakage and required revision. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 85% (60% to 100%) at last known follow-up. These early results demonstrate that the non-invasive extendible prosthesis allows successful lengthening without surgical intervention, but the high incidence of infection is a cause for concern.

We report our early experience with a new peri-acetabular reconstruction endoprosthesis used for pelvic reconstruction after tumour resection. The outcome of 21 patients who underwent limb salvage following type II pelvic resection and reconstruction using the peri-acetabular reconstruction prosthesis between 2000 and 2006 was retrospectively reviewed. This prosthesis was designed to use the remaining part of the ilium to support a horizontally placed acetabular component secured with internal fixation and bone cement. Into this device a constrained acetabular liner is positioned which is articulates with a conventional femoral component to which a modular extension and modular head are attached. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months (1 to 77). The most common complications were deep infection, superficial wound infections, and dislocation. The mean musculoskeletal tumor society functional outcome score for the survivors was 20.1(11 to 27).

We recommend the use of the peri-acetabular reconstruction prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects after type II pelvic resection, as this design has a greater inherent stability over other available prostheses.

We undertook a cemental unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement in 131 patients with a mean age of 50 years (2 to 84). Primary malignant tumours were present in 54 patients and 67 had metastatic disease. In addition, eight patients had either lymphoma or myeloma and two had non-oncological disorders. The mean follow-up was 27 months (0 to 180). An acetabular revision was required later in 14 patients, 12 of whom had been under the age of 21 years at the time of insertion of their original prosthesis. The risk of acetabular revision in patients over 21 years of age was 8% at five years compared with 36% in those aged under 21 years. All the unipolar hips in this younger age group required revision within 11 years of the initial operation.

We conclude that unipolar replacement should not be used in younger patients and should be avoided in patients with a life expectancy of more than five years.

We reviewed 25 patients in whom a MUTARS megaprosthesis with a conical fluted stem had been implanted. There were three types of stem: a standard stem was used in 17 cases (three in the proximal femur, nine in the distal femur and five proximal tibia), a custom-made proximal femoral stem in four cases and a custom-made distal femoral stem in four cases. The mean age of the patients was 40.1 years (17 to 70) and the mean follow-up was for 2.5 years (0.9 to 7.4).

At follow-up two patients had died from their disease: one was alive with disease and 22 were disease-free. One of 23 prostheses had been removed for infection and another revised to a cemented stem. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.9 (12 to 30) and the mean Karnofsky index was 82% (60% to 100%).

There was no radiological evidence of loosening or subsidence. Stem stress shielding was seen in 11 patients and was marked in five of these.

There were five complications, rupture of the extensor mechanism of the knee after extra-articular resection in two patients, deep venous thrombosis in one, septic loosening in one, and dislocation of the hip in one.

The survival rate after seven years was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83 to 91) for the patients and 95% (95% CI 91 to 99) for the megaprosthesis. A longer follow-up is needed to confirm these encouraging results.

Between 1966 and 2001, 1254 patients underwent excision of a bone tumour with endoprosthetic replacement. All patients who had radiotherapy were identified. Their clinical details were retrieved from their records.

A total of 63 patients (5%) had received adjunctive radiotherapy, 29 pre-operatively and 34 post-operatively. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores of irradiated patients were significantly lower (log-rank test, p = 0.009). The infection rate in the group who had not been irradiated was 9.8% (117 of 1191), compared with 20.7% (6 of 29) in those who had pre-operative radiotherapy and 35.3% (12 of 34) in those who radiotherapy post-operatively. The infection-free survival rate at ten years was 85.5% for patients without radiotherapy, 74.1% for those who had pre-operative radiotherapy and 44.8% for those who had post-operative radiotherapy (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The ten-year limb salvage rate was 89% for those who did not have radiotherapy and 76% for those who did (log-rank test, p = 0.02).

Radiotherapy increased the risk of revision (log-rank test, p = 0.015). A total of ten amputations were necessary to control infection, of which nine were successful. Radiotherapy may be necessary for the treatment of a bone sarcoma but increases the risk of deep infection for which amputation may be the only solution.