Fracture related infections (FRI) are debilitating complications of musculoskeletal trauma surgery that can result in permanent functional loss or amputation. This study aims to determine risk factors associated with FRI treatment failure, allowing clinicians to optimise them prior to treatment and identify patients at higher risk. A major trauma centre database was retrospectively reviewed over a six-year period. Of the 102 patients identified with a FRI (66 male, 36 female), 29.4% (n=30) had acute infections (onset <6 weeks post-injury), 34.3% (n=35) had an open fracture. Open fractures were classified using Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification (type 2:n=6, type 3A:n=16, type 3B:n=10, type 3C:n=3). Patients with periprosthetic infections of the hip and knee joint, those without prior fracture fixation, soft tissue infections, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure sore infections, patients who died within one month of injury, <12 months follow-up were excluded. FRI treatment failure was defined as either infection recurrence, non-union, or amputation. Lifestyle, clinical, and intra-operative data were documented via retrospective review of medical records. Factors with a P-value of p<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. FRI treatment failure was encountered in 35.3% (n=36). The most common FRI site was the femoral shaft (16.7%; n=17), and 15.7% (n=16) presented with signs of systemic sepsis. 20.6% (n=21) had recurrent infection, 9.8% (n=10) had non-union, and 4.9% (n=5) required an amputation. The mean age at injury was 49.71 years old. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, 37 patients were current smokers (36.3%), 31 patients were diabetics (30.4%), and 32 patients (31.4%) were obese (BMI≥30.0). Average follow-up time was 2.37 (range: 1.04-5.14) years. Risk factors for FRI treatment failure were BMI>30, GA type 3c, and implant retention. Given that FRI treatment in 35.3% (36/102) ended up in failure, clinicians need to take into account the predictive variables analysed in this study, and implement a multidisciplinary team approach to optimise these factors. This study could aid clinicians to redirect efforts to improve high risk patient management, and prompt future studies to trial adjuvant technologies for patients at higher risk of failure

Infection remains among the first reasons for failure of joint prosthesis. Currently, the golden standard for treating prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is two-stage revision. However, two-stage procedures have been reported to be associated with higher costs and possible higher morbidity and mortality, compared to one-stage. Furthermore, recent studies showed the ability of a fast-resorbable, antibacterial-loaded hydrogel coating to reduce surgical site infections after joint replacement, by preventing bacterial colonization of implants. Aim of this study was then to compare the infection recurrence rate after a one-stage, cemenless exchange, performed with an antibacterial coated implant versus a standardized two-stage revision procedure. In this two-center prospective study, 22 patients, candidate to revision surgery for PJI, were enrolled to undergo a one-stage revision surgery with cementless implants, coated intra-operatively with a fast-resorbable, antibiotic-loaded hyaluronan and poly-D,L-lactide based hydrogel coating (“Defensive Antibacterial Coating”, DAC, Novagenit, Italy). DAC was reconstructed according to manufacturer indications and loaded with Vancomycin or Vancomycin + Meropenem, according to cultural examinations, and directly spread onto the implant before insertion. This prospective cohort was compared with a retrospective series of 22 consecutive patients, matched for age, sex, host type, site of surgery, that underwent a two stage procedure, using a preformed, antibiotic-loaded spacer (Tecres, Italy) and a cementless implant. The second surgery, for definitive implant placing, was performed only after CRP normalization and no clinical sign of infection. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic evaluation were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Infection recurrence was defined by the presence of a sinus tract communicating with the joint, or at least two among the following criteria: clinical signs of infections; elevated CRP and ESR; elevated synovial fluid WBC count; elevated synovial fluid leukocyte esterase; a positive cultural examination from synovial fluid; radiographic signs of stem loosening. The two groups did not differ significantly for age, sex, host type and site of surgery (18 knees and 4 hips, respectively). The DAC hydrogel was loaded intra-operatively, according to cultural examination, with vancomycin (14 patients) or vancomycin and meropenem (8 cases). At a mean follow-up of 20.2 ± 6.3 months, 2 patients (9.1%) in the DAC group showed an infection recurrence, compared to 3 patients (13.6%) in the two-stage group. No adverse events associated with the use of DAC or radiographic loosening of the stem were observed at the latest follow-up months. This is the first report on one-stage cementless revision surgery for PJI, performed with a fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating. Our data, although in a limited series of patients and at a relatively short follow-up, show similar infection recurrence rate after one-stage exchange with cementless, coated implants, compared to two-stage revision. These findings warrant further studies in the possible applications of antibacterial coating technologies to treat implant-related infections

Intro. Calcium sulphate (CS) is a recent alternative for antibiotic elution in infected bones and joints. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate (AICS) beads in the management of infected tibia and femur, with regards to patient outcomes and complication rates (including reinfection rate, remission rate and union rate). Methods. Searches of AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted in June 2020, with the mesh terms: “Calcium sulphate beads” or “Calcium sulfate beads” or “antibiotic beads” or “Stimulan” AND “Bone infection” or “Osteomyelitis” or “Debridement” AND “Tibia” or “Femur”. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of interventions (ROBINS-i) tool, and quality assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results. Out of 105 relevant papers, 11 met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Total infection recurrence rate was 6.8% (range 3.2 – 11.9%, n = 295), which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA; 19.6%, n = 163). Complication rates varied. The main issue regarding AICS use was wound drainage (7.9 – 33.3%), which was considerably higher in studies involving treatment of the tibia only. Studies using PMMA did not experience this issue, but there were a few incidences of superficial pin tract infection following surgery. Conclusions. AICS was consistently effective at infection eradication, despite variation in causative organism and location of bead placement. Additionally, PMMA has many inconvenient properties. AICS is therefore an attractive alternative as an adjunct in treatment of infected tibia and femur. Wound drainage rate varied and was higher in studies regarding tibial cases alone

Background. The different biodegradable local antibiotic delivery systems are widely used in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal activity antibiotic loaded PerOssal pellet in vitro and its effectiveness in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus induced chronic osteomyelitis. Material and methods. MALDI-TOF have been applied to microbiological diagnosis in patient with osteomyelitis. In most cases, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated. In vitro Ceftriaxone-Loaded PerOssal pellet were placed in middle agar plate containing a stock strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Plates were incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours. The zones of bacterial inhibition were recorded after 24, 48 and 72 hours of incubation. In vivo evaluation was performed by prospectively studying of 21 patients with a clinically and bacteriologically diagnosed Staphylococcus aureus induced osteomyelitis. Mean age was 38±4,2(26 to 53)). After radical surgical debridement and ultrasound cavitation, the bone cavity was full filled with Perosal pellets loaded with different antibiotics depending from the antibiotic sensitivity test. Endpoints were the absence of clinical manifestation of infection or disease recurrence, no need for further surgery. Results. In vitro showed after 24 hrs inhibition zone was 4,2 х 4,9 cm, after 72 hrs the inhibition zone was increased till 7,6 х 8,4 cm. During the subsequent time, there were no changes. Results of the clinical study evidenced no signs of infection in 18 patients (86% (CI 69,8;100)) (p<0,05) at the follow up, while 3 (14%(CI 0;30,2)) (p<0,05) subjects showed infection recurrence at 6 months from operation and 2 of them needed further surgical procedures. Conclusion. PerOssal as an antibiotic carrier stabilizes the action of the antibiotic. This antibiotic carrier system allows to choose an antibiotic individually for each patient according to the antibiotic sensitivity test and can be successfully used in clinical cases of osteomyelitis

The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes. Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has been performed. . In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound (Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics were also used in all groups. After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%) patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up, respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication rate. Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:845–50

Chronic osteomyelitis is historically treated in a two stage fashion with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as local antibacterial therapy. However, two-stage surgeries are associated with high morbidity, long hospitalization and high treatment costs. In recent years new biomaterials were developed that allow to change this treatment algorithm. S53P4 bioactive glass is such a novel biodegradable antibacterial bone graft substitute that enables a one-stage surgery in local treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. This study aimed to explore the eradication of infection and bone healing capacities of S53P4 bioactive glass in clinical practice. In this prospective longitudinal outcome study, clinical applicability of S53P4 bioactive glass in treatment of patients with chronic osteomyelitis was assessed. All patients with clinically, haematologically and radiologically evident chronic osteomyelitis were included. All patients were treated with an extensive debridement surgery, S53P4 bioactive glass implantation and systemic antibiotic administration. Primary endpoint of this study is eradication of infection. During follow-up eradication was analysed based on clinical outcomes, blood samples (inflammatory parameters) and radiological outcomes. The secondary endpoint, bone healing, is assessed using conventional radiographic images of the treated region. Between 2011 and 2016, 25 patients were included in this study, with a mean follow-up of 23 months (range 4 – 57). Hospital stay was short with a mean of 18 days (range 4 – 40) and patients required an average of 1,4 surgeries (range 1 – 4). The inflammatory parameter C-reactive protein (CRP) showed a normalization after a mean duration of 46 days (range 0 – 211). At the end of follow-up haematological and clinical outcomes showed eradication of infection in 24 (96%) of all patients. Radiologically none of all patients showed persisting signs of infection and bone healing was observed in 22 (88%) patients based on changes on conventional radiographic images. One patient had a persistent infection without any bone healing, this patient had an infected non-union prior to surgery. There were two other patients with an initial infected non-union fracture which was not consolidated at last follow-up, although they had successful infection treatment. Another patient had a femoral fracture after surgery that needed additional surgery which did not interfere with eradication of infection. Four (16%) of all patients had initial wound healing problems related to compromised skin and/or soft tissue prior to surgery. Based on the results of our clinical experience, S53P4 bioactive glass can successfully be used in a one-stage procedure for treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Eradication of infection was successful in almost all patients and so far no patients required a second surgery due to infection recurrence. Bone healing (incorporation of the bioactive glass) was seen in all patients except for the patients with an initial infected non-union fracture. As a consequence of these results, we changed our institutional protocol for treatment of chronic osteomyelitis to a one-stage approach instead of a two-step approach