Computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has proven to significantly reduce the number of outliers in prosthesis positioning and to improve mechanical leg alignment. Despite these advantages the acceptance of navigation technologies is still low among orthopaedic surgeons. The time required for navigation might be a reason for the low acceptance. The aim of the study was to test whether software and instrument improvements made in an established navigation system could lead to a significant navigation acquisition time reduction. An improved and the current version of the TKA navigation software were used to perform surgery trials on a human cadaveric specimen by two experienced orthopaedic surgeons. A significant effect of the “procedure” (navigation software version) on the navigation time (p< 0.001) was found, whereas the difference between surgeons was not significant (p= 0.2). There was no significant interaction between surgeon and navigation software version (p= 0.5). The improved version led to a significant navigation acquisition time reduction of 28%. Software and instrument improvements led to a statistically significant navigation acquisition time reduction. The achieved navigation acquisition time decrease was independent from surgeon. Specific instrument and software improvements in established navigation systems may significantly decrease the surgery time segments where navigation takes place. However, the total navigation acquisition time is low in comparison to the total surgery time

Acetabular component malalignment remains the since greatest root cause for revision THA with malposition of at least ½ of all acetabular component placed using conventional methods1. The use of local anatomical landmarks has repeatedly proven to be an unreliable. The reason for this is that the position of local anatomical landmarks varies widely from one patient to another. Another alternative is to simply place acetabular components in a supine position. Unfortunately, cups placed in the supine position under fluoroscopy had the highest incidence of cup malposition in the Callanan study. This is because acetabular anteversion is critically important and pelvic tilt during surgery in the supine position is unknown, uncontrolled, and not correlated with post-operative pelvic tilt. Image-free surgical navigation can be useful for cup alignment in the absence of pelvic deformity. Image-based surgical navigation can be effective for cup alignment in the presence or absence of pelvic deformity. Unfortunately, while these technologies have been available for a decade, few surgeons employ these technologies. This is likely due to added time, complexity, and expense. Current robotic technology embodies all of these limitations in an even more extreme form. The HipSextant is a smart mechanical instrument system was developed to quickly and easily achieve accurate cup alignment. The system is image based (CT or MR) and can handle extreme asymmetry and deformity. The instrument docks on a patient-specific basis with 3 legs: one through the incision behind the posterior rim, one percutaneously on the lateral side of the ASIS, and a third percutaneously on the surface of the ilium. A direction indicator on the top of the instrument points in the desired cup orientation. Since the planning is provided, the surgeon needs to only review and adjust the plan as desired. Further the system is robust, showing greater accuracy than image-based traditional navigation. Finally, the system takes typically only 3 minutes to use, making it practical for busy practices and hospitals

Surgical navigation systems enable surgeons to carry out surgical interventions more accurately and less invasively, by tracking the surgical instruments inside human body with respect to the target anatomy. Currently, optical tracking (OPT) is the gold standard in surgical instrument tracking because of its sub-millimeter accuracy, but is constrained by direct line of sight (LOS) between camera sensors and active or passive markers. Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) is an alternative without the requirement of LOS, but subject to environmental ferromagnetic distortion. An intuitive idea is to integrate respective strengths of them to overcome respective weakness and we aim to develop a tightly-coupled method emphasising the interactive coupled sensor fusion from magnetic and optical tracking data. In order to get real-time position and orientation of surgical instruments in the surgical field, we developed a new tracking system, which is aiming to overcome the constraints of line-of-sight and paired-point interference in surgical environment. The primary contribution of this study is that the LOS and point correspondence problems can be mitigated using the initial measurements of EMT, and in turn the OPT result can provide initial value for non-linear iterative solver of EMT sensing module. We developed an integrated optical and electromagnetic tracker comprised of custom multiple infrared cameras, optical marker, field generator and sensing coils, because the current commercial optical or magnetic tracker typically consists of unchangeable lower level proprietary hardware and firmware. For the instrument-affixed markers, the relative pose between passive optical markers and magnetic coils is calibrated. The pose of magnetic sensing coils calculated by electromagnetic sensing module, can speed up the extraction of fiducial points and the point correspondences due to the reduced search space. Moreover, the magnetic tracking can compensate the missing information when the optical markers are temporarily occluded. For magnetic sensing subsystem comprised of 3-axis transmitters and 3-axis receiving coils, the objective function for nonlinear pose estimator is given by the summation of the square difference between the measured sensing data and theoretical data from the dipole model. Non-linear optimisation is computational intensive and requires initial pose estimation value. Traditionally, the initial value is calculated by equation-based algorithm, which is sensitive to noise. Instead, we get the initial value from the measurement of optical tracking subsystem. The real-time integrated tracking system was validated to have tracking errors about 0.87mm. The proposed interactive and tightly coupled sensor-fusion of magnetic-optical tracking method is efficient and applicable for both general surgeries as well as intracorporeal surgeries

Background. Surgeons are waiting for a hassle free, time saving, precise and accurate guide for hip arthroplasty. Industry are waiting for instruments to reduce manufacturing costs associated with washing, assembling, sterilization and transportation. Patient specific / custom made surgical guides may deliver these goals but current systems have had limited assessments. We comprehensively assessed a new guiding system for the acetabular component of hip replacement, “Bullseye”. Methods. Planning. We used either Computer Tomography (CT) (n=22) or Magnetic Resonance (MR) (n=6) imaging to plan the position of acetabular components into 28 acetabulums of cadavers (n=12) and dry bone models (n=16). 10 of the dry bone models had complex deformities (crowe 4 hip dysplasia or Paprosky 3A defects). Surgical positioning. Patient specific “Bullseye” guides were manufactured using 3D printing and standard instruments were used to ream the acetabulum, guided by Bullseye, and position cup components. Post surgery. The pelvises underwent CT scanning after implantation of acetabular cups. 3D software measured the “radiographic” (as opposed to operative or anatomic) cup inclination and version angles using the anterior pelvic plane as a reference. Achieved position was compared to the plan. Statistics. We used Bland Altman plots to quantify the strength of the agreement between the planned and achieved cup orientations in terms of fixed bias, correlation coefficient and 2 standard deviation limits of agreement. Results. Measurement of the cup position angles with 3D CT after implantation with the Bullseye hip instruments showed a median (Interquartile range) difference in degrees between planned and achieved position of 2.5 (1–6) for inclination and 8 (3–10) for version. The use of CT or MR imaging for planning produced similar results. Bland Altman plots for cup inclination and version angles respectively, showed a fixed bias of +3 and +6 degrees; in other words the guide increased the planned cup angles by consistent 3 and 7 degrees on average. The estimated bias, was 3.9 and 7 degrees respectively. The 95% (1.96 SD) limits of agreement were 7 and 10 respectively. Discussion. This robust assessment, involving the use of 3D CT, of the Bullseye hip instruments system showed good early results with 95% limits of agreement between planned and achieved cup angles of 7.3 and 10 degrees for inclination and version respectively. In other words, the Bullseye instruments can achieve better cup position than any published study of conventional techniques. Or put another way, a cup planned to be at the centre of Lewinnek's safe zone of acetabular cup position (inclination range between 30 and 50 degrees; version range between 5 and 25 degrees) would be achieved in 95% of cases. This could be improved further by adjusting for the fixed bias and choosing cases with simple bony anatomy. Conclusion. The Bullseye hip instruments have the potential to reduce the wide variation in the positioning of acetabular components during hip arthroplasty. It is now ready for a clinical evaluation

Our prospective observational study of patients treated for Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) by anterior instrumentation aimed at investigating the correlation between the radiographic outcome and the recently-developed scoliosis research society self-reported outcomes instrument (SRS-22) which has been validated as a tool for self-assessment in scoliosis patients. Previous patient based questionnaires demonstrated poor correlation with the radiological parameters. Materials and Methods. Pre-operative, post-operative and two years follow-up radiographs of 30 patients were assessed. Thirteen radiographic parameters including Cobb angles and balance were recorded. The percentage improvements for each were noted. The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by all patients at final follow-up. Correlation was sought between each radiographic parameter, total SRS score and each of the five domains by quantifying Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (r). Results. Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165), apical vertebra translation of the primary curve (r = -0.353), thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and lumbar lordosis (r = 0.147) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score and its five individual domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the upper instrumented vertebra angle and at follow-up and SRS-22 (r = -0.516). The same was true for Sagittal plumb line shift at final follow up (r = -0.447). Conclusion. SRS-22 is a validated tool for the self-assessment of health status in spinal deformity patients; however, it does not seem to correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome with the exception of upper instrumented vertebra angle and sagittal plumb line which do correlate significantly with the SRS-22 outcomes instrument. A comprehensive system of assessing the success of surgery both from the patient and clinicians perspective is required in the spinal deformity patient

A 51 years old female who experienced difficulty in gait ambulation due to secondary osteoarthritis of knee showed knee instability caused by paralysis associated with poliomyelitis and scoliosis. At the first medical examination, right knee range of motion was 0° to 90°, and spino malleolar distance (SMD) showed 72cm for the right leg, 78cm for the left leg, and the bilateral comparison of SMD indicated the leg length discrepancy of 6cm. The patient has a history of surgeries with an anterior – posterior instrument for the treatment of scoliosis, and with Langenskiöld method for the paralyzed right knee at the age of seventeen. The patient also experienced varus degeneration at the age of twenty seven, which was surgically treated with high tibial osteotomy. In this case, a reoperation of her right knee was performed due to the reoccurrence of the knee pain. Preoperative planning was performed using Patient-matched instrument (Signature; Biomet) which was created based on computed tomography data. Each part of osteotomy followed the resection guide by Signature, and a total knee arthroplasty was carried out using the Rotating Hinge Knee System (Zimmer, warsaw. Inc). Two week after the operation, the patient showed the ability to walk without any assistance, and has been in a good condition

Purpose. External rotation of the femoral component is one factor that favors a satisfactory clinical result. New technologies have been developed to precisely implant the components of a total knee arthroplasty, including computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-specific instruments (PSIs). The aim of this study was to compare the precision of CAS and PSIs when determining the orientation of the femoral component. Methods. A total of 65 patients operated on in 2008 with CAS had pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) in which the posterior condylar angle (PCA) was measured. The same pre- and post-operative measurements were performed for 27 patients operated on in 2010 with the assistance of PSI. For both populations, the antero-posterior femoral cuts were directed to implant the femoral component 3° of external rotation from the pre-operative posterior condylar line (PCL). Results. The pre-operative parameters for both groups were identical. The post-operative PCA was not significantly different between the CAS and PSI groups, but the pre- to post-operative difference in PCA for the PSI group indicated a diminution of 2 ± 2° compared to no change in the CAS group. A total of 28% of the patients operated on with CAS had their femoral component more internally rotated after the surgery compared to the pre-operative measurements. Conclusion. Both PSI and CAS achieve the same objective of externally rotate the femoral component in the transversal plan, even if CAS, some femoral components still remains less rotated than the plan

Clinical management of patellofemoral (PF) instability is a challenge, particularly considering the wide range of contributing variables that must be taken into consideration when determining optimal treatment. An important outcome measure to consider in this patient population is disease-specific quality of life (QOL). The purpose of this study was to factor analyse and reduce the total number of items in the Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII). Subsequent to the factor analysis, the new, item-reduced BPII 2.0 was tested for validity, reliability and responsiveness. Disease-specific QOL was measured in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PF instability (n = 223) at the initial consultation with the original BPII. Data from these BPII scores was used to employ a principal component analysis (PCA) to factor analyse and reduce the total number of items in the original BPII, to create the new BPII 2.0. The BPII 2.0 underwent content validation (Cronbach's Alpha, patient interviews and reading-level); construct validation (ANOVA comparing the initial consultation, 6, 12 and 24 month post-operative, Eta squared); convergent validation (Pearson r correlation to the original BPII); responsiveness testing (Eta squared, anchor-based distribution testing); and reliability testing (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 2,k). The original BPII was successfully reduced from 32 to 23 items. The new BPII 2.0 demonstrated excellent Cronbach's Alpha values: initial consult = 0.91; 6-months = 0.96; 12-months = 0.97; and 24-months post-operative = 0.76. Grade-level reading assessment for all items in the BPII 2.0 was below grade twelve. The ANOVA determined the BPII 2.0 was able to discriminate between the initial consultation, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operative assessments, with significant differences between each time-point (p < 0.05). Eta squared was 0.40, demonstrating a medium to large effect size. Convergent validity was established with the BPII 2.0 significantly correlated to the original BPII (initial consult = 0.82, 6-month = 0.90, 12-month = 0.90, and 24-month = 0.94). Anchor-based responsiveness was established with a significant correlation between the 7-point scale of patient-perceived improvement and 24-month post-operative BPII 2.0 scores. Strong reliability was established with an ICC (2,k) = .97. The BPII has undergone a critical step in its psychometric and clinimetric evolution: structural validation. With the work completed in this study, the BPII and BPII 2.0 have completed assessment of seven of the nine Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) properties including: 1) Internal consistency; 2) Reliability; 3) Standard error of measurement; 4) Content validation; 5) Structural validity; 6) Criterion validity; and, 7) Responsiveness testing. Completion of these assessments and the introduction of a structurally valid and shorter questionnaire, the BPII 2.0, provides a definitive level of credibility to this disease-specific outcome measure

Introduction. The French paradox regarding cemented femoral components has not been resolved, so we compared the mechanical behavior of a French stem, the CMK stem (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), with a collarless, polished, tapered stem (CPT, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) using an original biomechanical instrument. Materials and Methods. Two size-3 CPT stems and two size-302 CMK stems stems were fixed with bone cement into a composite femur soaked in vegetable oil to simulate wet condition. The composite femur was attached to a biomechanical testing instrument after stem implantation, and a 1-Hz dynamic sine wave load (3000 N) was applied to the stems for a total of 1 million cycles. An 8-hour unload period was set after every 16 hours of load. Femur temperature was maintained at 37°C during testing. The femoral canal was prepared for the CPT stems by standard rasping; for the CMK stems, however, the French method was used, in which cancellous bone was removed with a reamer. One CMK stem (CMK-1) was inserted into a femur without collar contact (>2 mm above the calcar), and the other (CMK-2) was inserted into a femur with collar contact. Stem subsidence was measured at the stem shoulder. Compressive force and horizontal cement movement were measured via rods set at the cement–bone interface on the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior sides of the proximal and distal portions of the composite femurs. Results. Subsidence was as follows: 0.521 mm and 0.629 mm for the CPT stems, 0.46 mm for CMK-1, and 0.36 mm for CMK-2. Compressive force at the cement–bone interface was at the maximum level at the proximomedial portion of all stems. These forces increased gradually until the one-millionth loading. Maximum compressive forces were 183 N and 107 N for the CPT stems, 180 N for CMK-1, and 215 N for CMK-2. There was a strong positive correlation between stem subsidence and compressive force in all stems. Radial cement creep at the proximomedial portion was 90 μ for one of the CPT stems, 184 μ for CMK-1, and −636 μ for CMK-2. Discussion. We previously reported our findings of a positive correlation between stem subsidence and compressive force in CPT stems. In the current study, CMK stems also subsided even when there was stem collar contact with bone. Subsidence was less in CMK stems than in CPT stems, but the values were close. In addition, compressive force and radial cement creep in CMK stems were also similar to or greater than in CPT stems. Conclusion. The two different concept stems demonstrated similar behavior in relation to bone cement, a finding that may present a solution to the French paradox

Introduction. Computed tomography (CT) can be utilized to design patient specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PSI preoperative plans predict bone resection, anterior-posterior implant position, implant rotation and implant size. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperatively predicted implant sizes (tibia and femur) to the actual implanted sizes. Data were compiled from two surgeons, one in the United Kingdom (Surgeon 1, cruciate retaining) and one in the United States (Surgeon 2, posterior stabilizing). Both used the same primary TKA implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®; DePuySynthes®, Warsaw, Indiana). This is the largest comparison of CT-based PSI size accuracy between two implant systems. Methods. An international cohort of 396 CT-based PSI-TKA preoperative plans (TruMatch®)were compared to postoperative implant records. Data were retrospectively analyzed for Sigma®(n=351) and Attune® (n=45), both as separate cohorts and as a combined cohort (Sigma® + Attune®). Three analyses were performed: Tibia and femur plan accuracy, major size changes (femoral size change or tibial size change resulting in a femoral size change) and minor size changes (tibial size change not impacting femoral size). Inter-rater reliability analyses using ICC (intra-class correlation) and the Kappa statistic were performed to determine reliability and agreement among the groups. Combined TKA implant data (Sigma® + Attune®) for surgeons 1 and 2 were compared for accuracy between users utilizing different implant designs, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS). Results. In the combined system analysis (Sigma® + Attune®) femoral implant prediction was 97.0% accurate and combined tibial implant size accuracy was 79.5%. There were no significant differences between the systems for tibial or femoral accuracy. See Table 1. There were 12 major size changes, 11 downsized femoral implants and 1 upsized femoral implant (all femoral changes were with Sigma® system). There were 81 minor size changes. Per Kappa, the plans were in excellent agreement with the femoral implant size and had substantial agreement with tibial implant size (p<.01). See Table 2. Comparing size accuracy between Surgeon 1 and Surgeon 2, Surgeon 1 had significantly greater tibial accuracy (p<.01), while femoral accuracy showed no significant difference (p=0.49). See Table 3. Discussion. In this combined data set of two surgeons, we report high implant sizing accuracy overall. This accuracy was noted across implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®) and across surgeons (1 and 2) utilizing different implant designs (CR vs. PS) using TruMatch® PSI. In all cohorts, the femur was more accurately predicted than the tibia. Accurate size reconstitution and reconstruction of the femur is critical for maintenance of posterior condylar offset, avoidance of anterior compartment overstuffing and avoidance of anterior femoral cortical notching. This study demonstrates the reproducibility of CT-based PSI TKA across different implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®), implant designs (CR and PS) and different surgeons. The ability to accurately predict implant size can also contribute system efficiencies: improved implant inventory management, development of size-focused instrumentation sets and potentially reduced workload for sterile processing departments

Introduction

Stryker computer navigation system has been used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures since October 2008 at the Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics.

Acetabular component malpositioning is the most common reason for instability and wear resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The current study aimed to assess a novel mechanical navigation device which was designed to simply and efficiently indicate appropriate cup orientation during surgery. The accuracy was compared to a series of hip arthroplasties performed using CT-based computer-assisted cup placement.

The study group consisted of 70 THAs performed using the mechanical device. The control group consisted of 146 THAs performed using CT-based computer navigation. Postoperative cup positioning was measured using a validated 2D/3D-matching method. An outlier was defined outside a range of ± 10 degrees from the planned inclination or anteversion.

In the study group the mean accuracy for inclination was 1.3 ± 3.4 (-6.6 – 8.2) and 1.0 ± 4.1 (-8.8 – 9.5) for anteversion with no outliers for either parameter. In the control group the accuracy for anteversion (3.0 ± 5.8 [-11.8 - 19.6]; p=0.6%) and the percentage of outliers (6.8%; p=3.3%) differed significantly. The accuracy for inclination (3.5 ± 4.1 [-12.7 - 9.5]; p=21.4%) and the percentage of ouliers (4.8%; p=9.9%) did not differ significantly.

The use of this mechanical navigation device can result in similar accuracy of acetabular cup orientation compared with CT-based surgical navigation. All cups were placed within a zone of ± 10 degree range of inclination and anteversion. This mechanical navigation device allows accurate cup navigation with minimal additional time and equipment.

Optimal alignment of the acetabular cup component is crucial for good outcome of total hip arthroplasty [THA]. Increased accuracy of implant positioning may improve clinical outcome. To achieve this, patient specific instrumentation was developed.

A patient-specific guide manufactured by 3D printing was designed to aid in positioning of the cup component with a pre-operatively defined anteversion and inclination angle. The guide fits perfectly on the acetabular rim. An alignment K-wire in a pre-operatively planned orientation is used as visual reference during cup implantation. Accuracy of the device was tested on 6 cadaveric specimens. During the experiment, cadavers were positioned for a THA procedure using a posterolateral approach. A normal-sized incision was made and approach used as in the conventional surgical procedure. The PSI was subsequently fitted onto the acetabular rim and secured into its unique position due to its patient specific design. The metallic pin was placed in a drill hole of the PSI. Post-operative CT image data of each acetabulum with the placed pin were transferred to Mimics and the 3D model was registered to the pre-operative one. The anteversion and inclination of the placed pin was calculated and compared to the pre-operatively planned orientation. The absolute difference in degrees was evaluated. A secondary test was carried out to assess the error during impaction while observing the alignment K-wire as a visual reference. In a laboratory setting, error during impaction with a visual reference of the K-wire was measured.

Deviation from planning showed to be on average 1.04° for anteversion and 2.19° for inclination. By visually aligning the impactor with this alignment K-wire, the surgeon may achieve cup placement as pre-operatively planned. The effect of the visual alignment itself was also evaluated in a separate test-rig showing minimal deviations in the same range. The alignment validation test resulted in an average deviation of 1.2° for inclination and 1.4° for anteversion between the metallic alignment K-wire used as visual reference and the metallic K-wire impacted by the test subjects. The inter-user variability was 0.9° and 0.8° for anteversion and inclination respectively. The intra-user variability was 1.6° and 1.0° for anteversion and inclination respectively. Tests per test subject were conducted in a consecutive manner.

We investigated the accuracy of two factors affecting accuracy in the cup insertion with PSI, i.e. accuracies of the errors of bony fitting and cup impaction. Since the accuracy of the major contributing factors to the overall accuracy of PSI for cup insertion with linear visual reference of a metallic K-wire was within the acceptable range of 2 to 3 degrees, we state that the PSI we have designed assists to achieve the preoperatively planned orientation of the cup and as such leads to the reduction of outliers in cup orientation. This acetabular cup orientation guide can transfer the pre-operative plan to the operating room.

Robotic surgical systems reduce the cognitive workload of the surgeon by assisting in guidance and operational tasks. As a result, higher precision and a decreased surgery time are achieved, while human errors are minimised. However, most of robotic systems are expensive, bulky and limited to specific applications.

In this paper a novel semi-automatic robotic system is evaluated, that offers the high accuracies of robotic surgery while remaining small, universally applicable and easy to use. The system is composed of a universally applicable handheld device, called Smart Screwdriver (SSD) and an application specific kinematic chain serving as a tool guide. The guide mechanism is equipped with motion screws. By inserting the SSD into a screw head, the screw is identified automatically and the required number of revolutions is executed to achieve the desired pose of the tool guide.

The usability of the system was evaluated according to IEC 60601-1-6 using pedicle screw implementation as an example. The achieved positioning accuracies of the drill sleeve were comparable to those of fully automatic robotic systems with −0.54 ± 0.93 mm (max: − 2.08 mm) in medial/lateral-direction and 0.17 ± 0.51 mm (max: 1.39 mm) in cranial/caudal- direction in the pedicle isthmus. Additionally, the system is cost-effective, safe, easy to integrate in the surgical workflow and universally applicable to applications in which a static position in one or more DOF is to be adjusted.

Background

Many scoring systems exist that assess ankle function, none of them are validated for use in a group of higher demand patients. This group of patients there have potential problems with ceiling effects, not being able to detect change or that a sports-subscale is not included. This study was to create a validated self-administered scoring system for ankle injuries in athletes by studying existing scoring systems and key-informant interviews.

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of acetabular component placement in cadavers using conventional techniques and CT-based individualised guides by both orthopaedic trainees and surgeons.

Seven cadaveric pelvises underwent a computerised tomography (CT) scan and a three-dimensional virtual model was created. Based on this model, cup orientation was planned for 40 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion and an individualised guide was designed. A physical model of the individualised guide was created using a Rapid Prototyping machine (dimension SST, Stratasys, Inc., USA).

The pelvises were mounted in the lateral position and covered with a soft tissue envelope exposing only the acetabulum as would be visualised during a lateral approach to the hip. A total of 26 participants (16 orthopaedic surgery residents, 10 orthopaedic surgeons) were asked to use an acetabular cup impactor to place the cup in 40 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion. This was first completed for all seven pelvises using conventional placement. Each participant was then instructed on how to use the individualised guide. They were provided with the guide and an individualised acetabular model to practice placement. Once they were comfortable with the system they were then asked to use the individualised guides in each of the seven pelvises.

An optoelectronic navigation system was used to evaluate the accuracy of the placement of the acetabular cup. An Optotrak Certus Motion Tracking System (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada) was used. An optoelectronic marker was attached to the acetabulum and a combined pair-point and surface matching was performed. After the guide was placed in the acetabulum, a tracked axial pointing device was aligned inside the guidance cylinder and its three-dimensional orientation stored. The angle deviation between the achieved position and the planned cup orientation was calculated.

There were no statistically significant differences between trainees and surgeons in either conventional placement or use of the individualised guides. There were no statistically significant differences in anteversion between the groups. The individualised guide showed statistical improvement in the absolute deviation from planned inclination compared to conventional placement (4.2° vs. 9.1°, p< 0.001) as well as a reduction in standard deviation (3.3 vs. 5.9, p< 0.001).

The use of individualised guides can improve the accuracy and precision in the placement of acetabular component positioning. The current guide design controls well for inclination, which is a key factor in the function of a total hip arthroplasty. Based on this data, we will implement design changes to better address version of the component. Future work will likely include comparison to computer-assisted cup placement as well.

In minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty double offset broach handles are used, in order to facilitate the preparation of the femoral canal. The maximum value of the main force peak and the impulse of two types of double offset broach handles (A European version, B American version) were compared to a single offset broach handle (S). Results have demonstrated that the highest values of the main force peak and force impulse were found in the single offset broach handle. Broach handle A had higher impulse values and lower maximum force values compared to broach handle B. In double offset broach handles less energy is transmitted to the tip. Broach handle A has a lower force peak than B and therefore a reduced risk of bone fracture.

Total knee arthoplasty (TKA) remains a standard treatment for advanced knee arthritis. The aim of the procedure is to restore function and relieve pain ideally for the rest of patient's life. Patient matched templating (PMT) or patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is a recent development for alignment of TKA components that uses disposable guides. The users of PSI claim it to be the optimum balance of new technology and conventional technique by reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools.

To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of Primary TKA done with PSI.

More than 200 cases of TKA have been done in our unit using PSI and we analysed the radiographic outcome of these cases postoperatively. We also reviewed the clinical outcome of 103 patients with 1 year and 43 patients with 2 year follow-up. Data was collected prospectively: pre-operatively and at 1 year and 2 years post-operatively including Oxford knee score (OKS), WOMAC and American knee society score (AKS). Standard AP and lateral films were done pre-operatively and post-operatively.

Mean age was 66 years. There were 56 female and 47 male patients. Mean post-operative angles on standard films were: Alpha = 95.6, Beta = 88.4, Saggittal femur = 3.4 and Saggittal tibia = 90.8. Of the 103 cases with 1 year follow-up, there was significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores. Mean OKS improved from 18 to 39 at 1 year and remained the same at 2 years, WOMAC improved from 40 to 18 in both 1 and 2 years post-op. AKS Total improved from 79 to 173 at 1 year and 170 at 2 years.

Performing TKA using PSI is safe and provides good radiological alignment in the coronal and sagittal plane. Significant improvement in outcome scores were seen at one and two year follow up and reached levels that compared favourably with other reported series of TKA outcome from our unit.

7% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients also present with a pars defect. To date, there are no available data on the results of fusion ending proximal to a spondylolysis in the setting of AIS. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in this patient cohort, to investigate if maintaining the lytic segment unfused represents a safe option. Retrospective review of all patients who received PSF for AIS, presented with a spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis and had a min. 2-years follow-up. Demographic data, instrumented levels and preoperative radiographic data were collected. Mechanical complications, coronal or sagittal parameters, amount of slippage and pain levels were evaluated. Data from 22 patients were available (age 14.4 ± 2.5 years), 18 Lenke 1–2 and four Lenke 3–6. Five patients (24%) had an isthmic spondylolisthesis, all Meyerding I. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the instrumented curves was 58 ± 13°. For 18 patients the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was the last touched vertebra (LTV); for two LIV was distal to the LTV; for two, LIV was one level proximal to the LTV. The number of segments between the LIV and the lytic vertebra ranged from 1 to 6. At the last follow-up, no complications were observed. The residual curve below the instrumentation measured 8.5 ± 6.4°, the lordosis below the instrumented levels was 51.4 ± 13°. The magnitude of the isthmic spondylolisthesis remained constant for all included patients. Three patients reported minimal occasional low back pain. The LTV can be safely used as LIV when performing PSF for the management of AIS in patients with L5 spondylolysis

Abstract. Background. Elderly patients with degenerative lumbar disease are increasingly undergoing posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation. There is a paucity of studies examining clinical outcomes, morbidity & mortality associated with this procedure in this population. Methods. A retrospective analysis of aged 80–100 years who underwent posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation at University Hospitals of Derby &Burton between 2016–2020. Results. Total 167 eligible patients, 163 octogenarians & 4 nonagenarians. Mean age was 82.78 ± 3.07 years. Mean length of hospital stay 4.79 ± 10.92 days. 76% were pain free at 3months following decompression. The average Charleston co-morbidity index (CCI) was 4.87. No association found with CCI in predicting mortality (ODD ratio 0.916, CI95%). 17patients suffered complications; dural tear (0.017%), post-op paralysis (0.017%), SSI(0.01%), and 0.001% of hospital acquired pneumonia, delirium, TIA, urinary retention, ileus, anaemia. High BMI (35+) was associated with increased incidence of complication (CI 95%, p<0.002). There was significant social drift following discharge as 147 patients went home and 4 patients to rehabilitation facility (p<0.001FE test). The mean operative time was 91.408±41.17 mins and mean anaesthetic time was 36.8±16.06 mins. Prolonged operative time was not associated with increased mortality.2year revision decompression rate was 0.011%. Conclusion. Posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stablisation in elderly is safe & associated with low mortality with 99.5%survival at 1 year. It significantly improves PROMs & has extremely low revision rate. Incidence of post-op complication is <0.05% and 54% of patients get discharged within 72hours of surgery. Careful selection & optimising patients with high BMI would reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality