Allograft bone is widely used in orthopaedic surgery, but peri-operative infection of the graft remains a common and disastrous complication. The efficacy of systemic prophylactic antibiotics is unproven, and since the graft is avascular it is likely that levels of antibiotic in the graft are low. Using an electrical potential to accelerate diffusion of antibiotics into allograft bone, high levels were achieved in specimens of both sheep and human allograft. In human bone these ranged from 187.1 mg/kg in endosteal (. sd. 15.7) to 124.6 (. sd. 46.2) in periosteal bone for gentamicin and 31.9 (. sd. 8.9) in endosteal and 2.9 (. sd. 1.1) in periosteal bone for flucloxacillin. The antibiotics remained active against bacteria in vitro after iontophoresis and continued to elute from the allograft for up to two weeks. Structural allograft can be supplemented directly with antibiotics using iontophoresis. The technique is simple and inexpensive and offers a potential means of reducing the rate of peri-operative infection in allograft surgery.
Introduction:
Introduction and Aims:
Objectives. The most concerning infection of allografts and operative procedures
is methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
and no current iontophoresed antibiotics effectively combat this
microbe. It was initially hypothesised that iontophoresis of vancomycin
through bone would not be effective due to its large molecular size
and lack of charge. The aim of this study was to determine whether
this was a viable procedure and to find the optimum conditions for its
use. . Methods. An iontophoresis cell was set up with varying concentrations
of Vancomycin within the medulla of a section of sheep tibia, sealed
from an external saline solution. The cell was run for varying times,
Vancomycin concentrations and voltages, to gain information on optimisation
of conditions for impregnating the graft. Each graft was then sectioned
and dust ground from the exposed surface. The dust was serially
washed to extract the Vancomycin and concentrations measured and
plotted for all variables tested. Results. Vancomycin was successfully delivered and impregnated to the
graft using the iontophoresis technique. The first order fit to
the whole data set gave a significant result (p = 0.0233), with
a significant concentration (p = 0.02774) component. The time component
was the next most significant (p = 0.0597), but did not exceed the
95% confidence level. Conclusions.
Revision arthroplasty after infection can often be complicated by both extensive bone loss and a relatively high rate of re-infection. Using allograft to address the bone loss in such patients is controversial because of the perceived risk of bacterial infection from the use of avascular graft material. We describe 12 two-stage revisions for infection in which segmental allografts were loaded with antibiotics using iontophoresis, a technique using an electrical potential to drive ionised antibiotics into cortical bone.
Introduction and Aims: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of dermal iontophoretic administration of Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 0.4% Injection, USP versus placebo in patients with medial and lateral elbow epicondylitis. Method: 199 patients with elbow epicondylitis received 40 mA-min of either active or placebo treatment on six occasions. Treatments were spaced one to three days apart and were completed within 15 days. Efficacy variables included patient and investigator global evaluation of improvement, patient and investigator pain evaluation, patient evaluation of symptoms, investigator disease severity assessment and investigator evaluation of tenderness. Baseline scores were compared with scores two days and one month after the sixth treatment. Results: Dexamethasone produced a 23 mm improvement in patient visual analog scale ratings compared with 14 mm for placebo (p=0.012) at two days and 24 mm compared with 19 mm (p=0.249) at one month. More dexamethasone patients than placebo patients had a score of moderate or better on the investigator global improvement score (52% vs 33%, p=0.013) at two days. This was not significant at one month (54% vs 49%, p=0.650). Investigator pain scores and tenderness scores favoured dexamethasone over placebo (p=0.019 and p<
0.001, respectively) at two days. Patients completing six treatments in ≤10 days appeared to show better efficacy than patients completing treatments over a longer period of time. Conclusion: