Previous scientific studies have highlighted how coupling is an important element affecting total hip arthroplasty's survival. This study aims to evaluate whether metal-on-metal (MOM) coupling could be a statistically significant risk factor. The data from the regional joint registry (Registro dell'Impiantologia Protesica Ortopedica, RIPO) was used for analysis. The data collection accuracy of this registry was 97.2% in 2017. We retrospective evaluate all MOM total hip arthroplasties (THAs) implanted in our department between January 01st 2000 and December 31st 2011. We used a control group composed by all other prosthesis implanted in our Department in the same time lapse. We registered 660 MOM THAs. Mean age of patients was 66.9 years. 603 patients have a >36mm head, while 78 a <36 mm one. Neck modularity was present in half of patients. 676 implants were cementless. We registered 69 revisions, especially due to aseptic mobilization (16 THAs), implant breakage (9 THAs) and periprosthetic fracture (6 THAs). The MOM THAs overall Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 87.2 at 15 years, and the difference between MOM THAs and other implants two curves is statistically significant (p<0.05). Male sex is a significant risk factors. Further evaluations are in progress to establish the presence of any additional risk factors. We think weight and/or BMI may be included in this category. Our study confirms the data currently present in the literature regarding a lower survival of metal-on-metal hip prostheses. The male sex is a statistically significant risk factor (p<0.05), while age, head size and modularity of the prosthetic neck are not statistically significant (p>0.05). Any new finds will be presented at the congress venue

Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

Abstract. Objectives. Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful and cost-effective interventions in orthopaedic surgery. Dislocation is a debilitating complication of THR and managing an unstable THR constitutes a significant clinical challenge. Stability in THR is multifactorial and is influenced by surgical, patient and implant related factors. It is established that larger diameter femoral heads have a wider impingement-free range of movement and an increase in jump distance, both of which are relevant in reducing the risk of dislocation. However, they can generate higher frictional torque which has led to concerns related to increased wear and loosening. Furthermore, the potential for taper corrosion or trunnionosis is also a potential concern with larger femoral heads, particularly those made from cobalt-chrome. These concerns have meant there is hesitancy among surgeons to use larger sized heads. This study presents the comparison of clinical outcomes for different head sizes (28mm, 32mm and 36mm) in primary THR for 10,104 hips in a single centre. Methods. A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent primary THR at our institution between 1st April 2003 and 31st Dec 2019 was undertaken. Institutional approval for this study was obtained. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, and all-cause revision excluding dislocation. Continuous descriptive statistics used means, median values, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to revision. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to compare revision rates between the femoral head size groups. Adjustments were made for age at surgery, gender, primary diagnosis, ASA score, articulation type, and fixation method. Results. 10,104 primary THRs were included; median age 68.6 years with 61.5% females. A posterior approach was performed in 71.6%. There were 3,295 hips with 28 mm heads (32.6%), 4,858 (48.1%) with 32 mm heads and 1,951 (19.3%) with 36 mm heads. Overall rate of revision was 1.7% with the lowest rate recorded for the 36mm group (2.7% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.1%). Cox regression analysis showed a decreased risk of all-cause revision for 32mm & 36mm head sizes as compared to 28mm; this was statistically significant for the 32mm group (p = 0.01). Risk of revision for dislocation was significantly reduced in both 32mm (p = 0.03) and 36mm (p = 0.03) head sizes. Analysis of all cause revision excluding dislocation showed no significant differences between head sizes. Conclusion. There was a significantly reduced risk of revision for all causes, but particularly revision for dislocation with larger head sizes (36mm & 32mm vs. 28mm). Concerns regarding increased risk of early revision for aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear or taper corrosion with larger heads appear to be unfounded in this cohort of 10,104 patients with a mean of 6.0-year follow-up. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Introduction. Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique. Methods. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. For THR, analysis comparing computer-guided versus conventional technique demonstrated HR of 0.771 (95%CI 0.573–1.036) p=0.085, and 0.594 (95%CI 0.297–1.190) p=0.142, for revision for all-causes and dislocation, respectively. When comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique, HR for revision for all-causes was 0.480 (95%CI 0.067 –3.452) p=0.466. For TKR, compared to conventional surgery, HR for all-cause revision for procedures performed using computer guidance and patient-specific jigs were 0.967 (95% CI 0.888–1.052) p=0.430, and 0.937 (95% CI 0.708–1.241) p=0.65, respectively. HR for analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique was 2.0940 (0.2423, 18.0995) p = 0.50. Conclusions. This is the largest study investigating this topic utilising propensity score analysis methods. We did not find a statistically significant difference in revision for all-causes and dislocation although these analyses are underpowered to detect smaller differences in effect size between groups. Additional comparison for revision for dislocation between robotic-assisted versus conventionally performed THR was not performed as this is a subset of revision for all-causes and wide confidence intervals were already observed for that analysis. It is also important to mention this NJR analysis study is of an observational study design which has inherent limitations. Nonetheless, this is the most feasible study design to answer this research question requiring use of a large data set due to revision being a rare outcome. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Patients ≤ 55 years have a high primary TKA revision rate compared to patients >55 years. Guided motion knee devices are commonly used in younger patients yet outcomes remain unknown. In this sub-group analysis of a large multicenter study, 254 TKAs with a second-generation guided motion knee implant were performed between 2011–2017 in 202 patients ≤ 55 years at seven US and three European sites. Revision rates were compared with Australian Joint Registry (AOANJRR) 2017 data. Average age 49.7 (range 18–54); 56.4% females; average BMI 34 kg/m2; 67.1% obese; patellae resurfaced in 98.4%. Average follow-up 4.2 years; longest follow-up six years; 27.5% followed-up for ≥ five years. Of eight revisions: total revision (one), tibial plate replacements (three), tibial insert exchanges (four). One tibial plate revision re-revised to total revision. Revision indications were mechanical loosening (n=2), infection (n=3), peri-prosthetic fracture (n=1), and instability (n=2). The Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.4% (95% C.I. 1.7% to 6.7%) at five years compared to AOANJRR rate of 6.9%. There was no differential risk by sex. The revision rate of the second-generation guided motion knee system is lower in younger patients compared to registry controls

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of Sugioka's transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO) for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. Seventy-eight patients (87 hips) were consecutively treated by TRO from 1989 to 1994. All patients followed 15 years or more were included. Four patients (4 hips) with traumatic osteonecrosis and five patients (5 hips) followed less than 15 years were excluded. A total of 69 patients (78 hips) were included. Average age at the time of operation was 42 years. There were 51 men (57 hips) and 18 women (21 hips). The average follow-up was 17 years (range, 15 to 20 years). Type of osteonecrosis was as follows: Type B; 2 hips, Type C1; 50 hips, and Type C2; 26 hips. Stage was as follows: stage 2; 29 hips, stage 3A; 34 hips, stage 3B; 13 hips, and stage 4; 2 hips. Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy was performed in 76 hips and posterior rotational osteotomy was performed in 2 hips. Clinical evaluation was evaluated by Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed based on the end point of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or re-collapse. Results. Twenty-nine hips (37.2%) were converted to THA, and 38 hips (48.7%) were re-collapsed. Average Harris hip score before operation was improved from 67 to 82 points at final follow-up. The reasons for conversion to THA within five years after osteotomy were cervical fracture or fixation failure, and 10 years after osteotomy progression of osteoarthritis due to re-collapse. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years after surgery was 69.2% (95% confidence interval: 58.8-79.6) and 15 years after surgery was 61.3% (95% CI: 49.9-72.7) with THA as the end-point. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years after surgery 50.0% (95% CI: 38.6-61.4) and at 15 years after surgery 50.0% (95% CI: 38.6-61.4) when re-collapse was defined as the end point. Type C1 was significantly better than Type C2. There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid-induced and non-corticosteroid-induced patients. There was no significant difference between the patients with early and late stage. Conclusion. The long-term outcome of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head was excellent. Sixty-three percent of the hips were not converted to THA. Type C2 was a significant risk factor for TRO

The aim of this study was to report the procedure survival and patient-reported outcomes in a consecutive series of patients <50yrs at the time of hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing system who have progressed to a minimum of 10yrs follow-up. Patients presenting for treatment of degenerative conditions of the hip electing to undergo hip resurfacing were included in a clinical registry (N=226 patients; 238 procedures). Procedure survival was confirmed by crosschecking to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and comparing to all procedures by other surgeons nationwide. Kaplan-meier survival curves with 95% confidence intervals were constructed, while patient-reported outcome measures were compared with t-tests and postoperative scores assessed with anchor analysis to age and gender-matched normative data. At mean follow up of 12 years, six cases were revised with a cumulative survival rate of 96.8% (95%CI 94.2–99.4) at 15 years. Majority of revisions were early (<3yrs) and occurred in females (N=4). Patient-reported general health, disease state, hip function and activity level maintained large improvements beyond 10 years post-implantation and were equal to or exceeded age and gender-matched normative data. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in males and females aged <50 years at time of surgery demonstrated a high rate of cumulative survival beyond 10 years follow up. The results demonstrate excellent outcomes in this age group

Introduction. The objective of this study was to verify the long-term outcome of transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy (ARO) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Consecutive series of 21 symptomatic ONFH patients with SLE (33 hips), aged 20 to 40 years, underwent ARO between 1980 and 1988. We reviewed the cases of 16 patients (25 hips), which represents a 76% rate of follow-up. Patients included 4 men and 12 women who had a mean age of 29 years at the time of surgery. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used for the survivorship analysis of ARO. Patients with surviving hips were evaluated by the modified Oxford hip score and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36). Results. Twelve hips in 8 patients survived at the final follow-up. The average length of surviving was 25 years (range, 20 to 27 years). Three patients (6 hips) had died of unrelated causes without any conversion at the mean time of 9 years after ARO. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis with the end point defined as any conversion, the survival rate at 25 years was 73.7% (95% confidence interval, 53.9 to 93.5%). Based on the classification of the modified Oxford hip score, 5 hips were classified as excellent, 2 hips were good, and the remaining 5 hips were fair. The average SF-36 physical component summary score was 34 points and the average mental component summary score was 46 points. The physical component summary scores of 3 patients (53.0, 56.6, 57.1) exceeded the level of the Japanese population norm. Conclusion. In ONFH patients with SLE, ARO achieved a 73.7% survival rate at 25 years

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in young patients are associated with high failure rates. We always use cemented total hip implants, however, in cases with acetabular bone stock loss we perform bone impaction grafting. Our purpose was to evaluate the outcome of 69 consecutive primary cemented total hips in patients younger than 30 years followed between 2 to 18 years. Methods. Between 1988 and 2004, 69 consecutive primary cemented THAs (mainly Exeters) were performed in 48 patients (32 women, 16 men) younger than thirty years. Average age at time of operation was 25 years (range, 16 to 29 years). Twenty-nine hips (42%) underwent acetabular bone impaction grafting because of acetabular bone loss. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 2 to 18 years). Revisions were determined, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Oxford Hip Questionnaire Score (OHQS) were obtained and radiographs were analyzed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. No patients were lost to follow-up, but 3 patients (4 hips) died during follow-up, none of whom had underwent revision. Eight revisions were performed: 3 septic loosenings (6, 7, and 8 years post-operative) and 5 aseptic cup loosenings (2, 3, 4, 5, and 9 years post-operative). No stems were loose. The average HHS and OHQS at follow-up were 89 points (range, 55 to 100 points) and 19 points (range, 12 to 42 points), respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative survival with revision for any reason as end point was 83% (95% CI, 69 - 92%) at 10 years. Excluding the infections, the survival rate was 90% (95% CI, 77 - 96%) with revision for aseptic loosening. The outcome of the patients who underwent acetabular bone impaction grafting was comparable to the primary cemented hips with a survival of 89% (95% CI, 62 - 97%) with revision for any reason as an end point. Excluding the infections, the survival rate was 95% (95% confidence interval, 72 - 99%) at ten years with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point. Conclusion. Primary cemented total hip arthroplasties in very young patients show satisfactory medium-term results, however, in cases with acetabular bone stock loss, a reconstruction with bone impaction grafting is advisable

Introduction. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head usually progresses to collapse in up to 70% to 80% of all cases. Previous studies have shown high failure rates with non-operative treatment, whereas, some surgical options including bone grafting, core decompression, osteotomy and arthroplasty have been recommended. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty, either cemented or cementless, are the last resort for improving the functional outcomes for the elderly. However, salvage of the femoral head in relatively young patients is widely advocated. Thus vascularized bone grafting has been recommended to salvage the collapsing femoral head. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors related to the outcome of the vascularized iliac bone grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. A retrospective case series review study is presented. Between April 1987 and April 2003, 47 patients (51 hips) in the authors' hospital underwent vascularized iliac bone grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Three patients were lost to follow-up, thus, 44 patients (48 hips), 38 men and 4 women, were included in the study. All patients underwent operation by one experienced senior surgeon. Patients were grouped according to related risk factors, i.e., trauma, corticosteroid, alcohol, and an idiopathic group. A radiographic scale, the Ficat and Arlet classification system, was used for grading the osteonecrosis. We set the conversion to total hip arthroplasty as the end point for survival of vascularized iliac bone grafting in this study. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to determine the significance with regard to the risk factors, age, Ficat and Arlet staging, gender, and side. Results. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed that the 5-year overall rate of graft survival was 68.5% (95% confidence interval: 52.7% to 80.0%), 10-year overall rate of graft survival was 61.5% (95% confidence interval: 44.4% to 74.8%), and 61.5% (95% confidence interval: 44.4% to 74.8%) at 15 years. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the prognostic factors of etiology, gender, side, and stage. The only significant parameter was the age that the patients older than 50 years had the worst 5-year survival rate of the femoral head (p<0.05). Conclusion. Vascularized bone grafting is a technically demanding procedure when compared to conventional core decompression or arthroplasty. However, this technique can preserve the femoral head from collapse and preclude the need for arthroplasty in young patients

Background and aims. Hallux rigidus in the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) can be treated with arthroplasty to reduce pain and enhance motion. Few studies have investigated the functionality and the survival of HemiCap arthroplasty. Primarily we aimed to examine the medium to long-term functionality and the degree of pain after surgery. Secondarily the failure and revision rate of HemiCap implants. Methods. A total of 106 patients were operated with HemiCap arthroplasty (n=114) from 2006 to 2014, median age 53 (16 to 80) years, 78 females, 37 dorsal flange (DF) implants. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively to collect revision data. Pre operative Coughlin/Shurnas arthrosis degree, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsalintermetatarsal (IM) and Distal Metaphyseal Articular Angle (DMAA) angles was were measured. Pre- and post operative 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year2-year pain levels of the first MTPJ by Visuel Analog Skala (VAS 1–10), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS 0 to 100 points) and, Range of Motion (ROM), were available for 51 patients. FortysevenForty-seven of the 70 available for reexamination partook in a cross sectional follow up where the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS 0–48 points) was added to the Patients Related Outcome Measures (PROMs). Statistics. Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis, adjusted for sex, radiological angles, degree of arthrosis and dorsal flange. Prospective PROMs and ROM compared by paired t-test. Results. At 3, 5 and 7 years we had an mean implant survival of 85%, 83% and 78%. Almost all were revised due to pain, one due to malalignment and one due to loosening of the Hemicap. Dorsal flange, gender, preoperative arthrosis degree, HV, IM or DMAA angles did not statistically influence the result. For those (n=23) that were re-examined, preoperative dorsal ROM changed from mean(sd) 21 (6) to 42 (18) degrees, VAS from 7 (2) to 2 (2) and AOFAS from 61 (11) to 87 (11) (p < 0.001). At mean 5 year follow up (n=47), mean (sd) dorsal ROM was 46 (17) degrees,. AOFAS was 84 (9), VAS 2 (1) and SEFAS 42 (6) points. The dorsal flange made no statistical significant difference for ROM or PROMs, but DF displayed 51 degrees of extension vs. 44 without (p=0.1). Periprostethic lucency (<2 mm) was observed in 27/47. Conclusions. In general, we saw an acceptable implant survival rate. We did not find any predictors that influenced implant failure and the design alterations with the dorsal flange are not evident clinically. Patients who were not revised had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better overall foot and ankle conditions than preoperatively, but the data are biased by missing numbers and revisions

Total hip replacement (THR) in young patients has been associated to higher revision rates than in older population. Different conditions may lead to end-stage arthritis of the hip in these patients. We compared the clinical and radiological outcome of two different groups of young and very young patients who underwent a ceramic-on-ceramic THR. 120 hips were prospectively followed for a mean of 10.4 years (range, 5 to 17). 38 patients (46 hips) were less than 30 years old (group 1), and, 68 (74 hips) were between 31 and 40 years old (group 2). Weight (p<0.001) and physical activity level were greater in group 2 (p<0.001). Preoperative function (p=0.03) and range of mobility (p=0.03) were worse in group 1. Primary osteoarthritis was not found in any case. Rheumatoid juvenile arthritis was the most frequent diagnosis in group 1 and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in group 2. A femoral funnel-shaped type 1 according to Dorr was more frequent in group 2 (p=0.04). The same ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented THR was used in all cases. Screws for cup fixation were only used when strictly needed. We analysed the clinical results according to the Merle-D´Aubignè and Postel scale, the postoperative radiological reconstruction of the hip and the radiological appearance of cup loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having a revision surgery. Screw use required to obtain a secured interference fit of the acetabular component was found more frequently in group 1 (p=0.01). Postoperative pain (p=0.002) and function (p=0.002) were better in group 1. Mean acetabular abduction angle of the cup was greater in group 1 (p=0.03) and reconstruction to the hip rotation center according to Ranawat (p=0.01) was better in group 2. Placement of the acetabular component inside the Lewinnek´s zone and stem position were similar in both groups. No hips were revised due to complications related to ceramic or to stem loosening. Three cups were revised for aseptic loosening in group 1 and four in group 2. The survival rate for cup aseptic loosening at 15 years was 92.3% (95% CI: 83.7 to 100) for group 1 and 93.1% (95% CI: 85.3 to 99.9) for group 2 (Log rank, p=0.88). Ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented THR is an excellent option for young and very young patients. Despite worse preoperative conditions in patients under the age of 30 years, a similar clinical outcome was found in this series

Although cemented fixation provides excellent results in primary total hip replacement (THR), particularly in patients older than 75 years, uncemented implants are most commonly used nowadays. We compare the rate of complications, clinical and radiological results of three different designs over 75-years-old patients. 433 hips implanted in patients over 75 years old were identified from our Local Joint Registry. Group A consisted of 139 tapered cemented hips, group B of 140 tapered grit-blasted uncemented hips and group C of 154 tapered porous-coated uncemented hips. A 28 mm femoral head size on polyethylene was used in all cases. The mean age was greater in group A and the physical activity level according to Devane was lower in this group (p<0.001 for both variables). Primary osteoarthritis was the most frequent diagnoses in all groups. The radiological acetabular shape was similar according to Dorr, however, an osteopenic-cylindrical femur was most frequently observed in group A (p<0.001). The pre- and post-operative clinical results were evaluated according to the Merle-D'Aubigne and Postel scale. Radiological cup position was assessed, including hip rotation centre distance according to Ranawat and cup anteversion according to Widmer. We also evaluated the lever arm and height of the greater trochanter distances and the stem position. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done for revision for any cause and loosening. The hip rotation centre distance was greater and the height of the greater trochanter was lower in group B (p=0.003, p<0.001, respectively). The lever arm distance was lower in group C (p<0.001). A varus stem position was more frequently observed in group B (p<0.001). There were no intra- or post-operative fractures in group A, although there were five intra-operative fractures in the other groups plus two post-operative fractures in group B and four in group C. The rate of dislocation was similar among groups and was the most frequent cause for revision surgery (8 hips for the whole series). The mean post-operative clinical score improved in all groups. The overall survival rate for revision for any cause at 120 months was 88.4% (95% CI 78.8–98), being 97.8% (95% CI 95.2–100) for group A, 81.8% (95% CI 64.8–98.8) for group B and 95.3% (95% CI 91.1–99.6) for group C (log Rank: 0.416). Five hips were revised for loosening. The overall survival rate for loosening at 120 months was 91.9% (95% CI 81.7–100), being 99.2%(95% CI 97.6–100) for group A, 85.5 (95% CI 69.9 −100) for group B and 100% for group C (Log Rank 0.093). Despite a more osteopenic bone in the cemented group, the rate of peri-prosthetic fractures was higher after uncemented THR in patients older than 75 years. Although the overall outcome is good with both types of fixation, the post-operative reconstruction of the hip, which might be more reliable after cemented fixation, may affect the rate of complications in this population

Metastatic osteosarcoma is seen in 10-20% of patients at initial presentation with the lung the most common site of metastasis. Historically, prognosis has been poor. We studied trends in survival in our small developed nation and aimed to identify correlations between the survival rate and three factors: newer chemotherapy, advances in radiological imaging and a more aggressive approach adopted by cardiothoracic surgeons for lung metastases. Our national bone tumour registry was used to identify patients at the age of 18 or under, who presented with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis between 1933 and 2006. There were 30 patients identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survival rates and univariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression proportional hazards model. Median survival has improved over the last 50 years; highlighted by the ‘Kotz’ eras demonstrating incremental improvement with more effective chemotherapy agents (p=0.004), and a current 5-year survival of 16%. Aggressive primary and metastatic surgery also show improving trends in survival. Three patients have survived beyond 5 years. The introduction of computerised tomography scanning has led to an increase in the prevalence of metastases at initial diagnosis. Metastatic osteosarcoma remains with a very poor prognostic factor, however, aggressive management has been shown to prolong survival

Background. Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). Methods. The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component. Results. In the isolated acetabular revision group the median Harris Hip Score was 74 at a mean of 4.5 years post-revision. In the both components revision group the median Harris hip score was 85 at a mean of 4 years. There was no significant difference in function between the groups. Kaplan-Meier survivor ship analysis after revision showed an average survival of 91% at 10 years. There was a significant difference between survival of isolated acetabular revision (75%) and both component revision (96%). Conclusions. Revision total hip replacement subsequent to failure of hip resurfacing has good outcome and good midterm survival. Isolated acetabular revision and revision of both components had similar function but survival was significantly worse in the isolated acetabular revision group

Introduction. Advanced stage and a large area of necrotic bone are known risk factors for failure after transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy of the hip in patients with osteonecrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were other risk factors for failure of this osteotomy. Methods. One hundred and five patients (113 hips) underwent transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for femoral head osteonecrosis and were followed for a mean period of 51 months post-operatively. Radiographic failure was defined as secondary collapse or osteoarthritic change. Multivariate analysis with the use of a Cox proportional-hazards frailty model was performed to assess factors that influenced the secondary collapse and osteophyte formation. A Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was performed to estimate survival. Results. Secondary collapse occurred in twenty-seven hips (23.9%) and fourteen of these hips (12.4%) were converted to a total hip arthroplasty. At the most recent follow-up, Merle d'Aubigne and Postel hip scores ranged from 6 to 18 points (mean, 16 points). Multivariate analysis showed that the stage of necrosis (hazard ratio=3.28; 95% confidence interval=1.49-7.24), age of the patient (hazard ratio=1.08; 95% confidence interval=1.02-1.14), body mass index (hazard ratio=1.19; 95% confidence interval=1.03-1.38), and extent of necrosis (hazard ratio=1.08; 95% confidence interval=1.04-1.11) were associated with secondary collapse. Seven of eighty-six hips without collapse progressed to osteoarthritis. Survivorship with total hip arthroplasty and radiographic failure as endpoints was 63.4% (95% confidence interval=51.1%-75.7%) and survivorship with total hip arthroplasty, radiographic failure, and loss of follow-up as endpoints was 56.0% (95% confidence interval=44.6%-67.4%) at 110 months. Conclusion. Our study showed that age, body mass index, stage, and extent of osteonecrosis were determining factors for secondary collapse, subsequent unsatisfactory clinical results, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. These factors should be considered in patient selection for the osteotomy

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of vascularized iliac bone grafting for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of 35 operations performed on 29 patients who had osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in which a pedicle iliac bone grafting was performed for minimum follow-up of 10 years. The average age was 35 years (range, 17 to 62 years). According to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association classification for ONFH, there were 28 stage 2, 7 stage 3-A, 17 type C-1 hips, and 18 type C-2 hips. After a bone tunnel of 1.5 × 5 cm was made in the anterior aspect of the femoral head and curettage of necrotic lesion was performed, the pedicle bone with the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) was inserted into the anterolateral portion of the femoral head. The average follow-up period was 13 years and 6 months. Weight bearing was not allowed for 2 months after the operation. Survival rate of the femoral head was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and collapse of the femoral head and configuration of the femoral head was investigated at final follow-up. Results. Collapse of the femoral head occurred in 19 hip joints of 35 studied. Although only 16 of 28 stage 2 hips showed collapse, all 7 stage 3 hips collapsed. Four of 17 hips (24%) showed collapse in patients with type C-1 necrosis, whereas, 15 of 18 hips (83%) developed collapse in patients with type C-2 necrosis. When the bone graft was inserted in the anterolateral portion of the femoral head, the incidence of collapse was reduced. In patients without collapse for more than 12 years, osteoarthritic change was evident in 5 hips between 12 to 19 years after operation. Conclusion. In this study, we found that collapse of the femoral head occurred or progressed in almost half of our patients, and these findings allowed us to clarify the operative indications for DCIA pedicle bone graft. In patients with stage 3, DCIA pedicle bone graft could not prevent collapse of the femoral head. While 13 of 17 hips with type C-1 were prevented from collapse, only 3 of 18 with type C-2 did not show collapse. These results indicate that DCIA bone graft may be indicated for stage 2, type C-1 necrosis. However, technical demands of this surgery tend to make it a less routine application for the treatment of ONFH