Background. There is a paucity of long term data concerning the pre and postoperative patient reported function of total knee replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality, implant survivorship, patient reported function and satisfaction in a cohort of 114 patients, from a single centre, who received a Kinemax total knee replacement more than 15 years ago. Methods. Patients completed a questionnaire incorporating validated disease- and joint-specific scores, patient satisfaction and overall health preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and a minimum of 15 years following surgery. NHS National Strategic Tracing Service, hospital and primary care records were used to establish mortality and for implant survivorship in deceased patients. Results. 45 patients were alive at final follow up. The survivorship of the cohort with revision of the TKR as the endpoint was 84%. Four cases were revised for wear, three for loosening and one for peri-prosthetic fracture. There was a significant improvement in WOMAC Pain, Function and Stiffness Scores, Oxford Knee Score and Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale between pre-operative and all post-operative time points, although patient satisfaction had decreased significantly by the time of final follow up. Conclusion. In this cohort, the Kinemax TKR showed satisfactory long term survivorship with functional scores demonstrating a high level of patient satisfaction at all follow up time points. Level of Evidence. 2

Summary Statement. Using current analysis/methodology, new implant technology is unlikely to demonstrate a large enough change in patient function to impact on the cost-effectiveness of the procedure. Purpose. Cost effectiveness is an increasingly important metric in today's healthcare environment, and decisions surrounding which arthroplasty prosthesis to implant are not exempt from such health economic concerns. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) are the typical assessment tool for this type of evaluation. Using this methodology, joint arthroplasty has been shown to be cost effective, however studies directly comparing the QALY achieved by differing prostheses are lacking. Methods. Data was gathered in a single centre prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing the outcome a modern implant, the Triathlon total knee replacement, with its traditionally designed predecessor the Kinemax, using the Short Form 6 dimensional (SF-6D) score and quality adjusted life year (QALY) methodology. The study cohort consisted of 64 patients that were randomised to a Triathlon and 60 randomised to a Kinemax. Results. There was a significant improvement in the SF-6D score for both groups at one year compared with pre-operative scores (p<0.0001). The calculated overall life expectancy for the study cohort was 15.1 years, which resulted in an overall QALY gain of 2.144 (95% CI 1.752–2.507). The modern implant group demonstrated only a small improvement in the SF-6D score compared to the traditional design at one year (0.141 versus 0.143, p=0.94). This difference in health gain resulted in the modern implant costing £298 less per QALY at one year, however this saving diminished to less than £30 per year over the lifetime of the cohort. Discussion. This study demonstrates that despite comparing 2nd and 4th generation design, modern implant technology does not influence the cost-effectiveness of TKA using the SF-6D and QALY methodology. As most implants demonstrate similar longevity, differences in patient function will likely carry the greatest influence on QALY. This type of analysis however assesses health status, and is not sensitive to joint specific function. Dramatic differences in patient outcome would be required to influence QALY score. Evolutionary design changes in implant technology are thus unlikely to influence QALY analysis following joint replacement, which has important implication for implant procurement

One of the main surgical goals when performing a total knee replacement (TKR) is to ensure the implants are properly aligned and correctly sized; however, understanding the effect of alignment and rotation on the biomechanics of the knee during functional activities is limited. Cardiff University has unique access to a group of local patients who have relatively high frequency of poor alignment, and early failure. This provides a rare insight into how malalignment of TKR's can affect patients from a clinical and biomechanical point of view to determine how to best align a TKR. This study aims to explore relationship clinical surgical measurements of Implant alignment with in-vivo joint kinematics. 28 patient volunteers (with 32 Kinemax (Stryker) TKR's were recruited. Patients undertook single plane video fluoroscopy of the knee during a step-up and step-down task to determine TKR in-vivo kinematics and centre of rotation (COR). Joint Track image registration software (University of Florida, USA) was used to match CAD models of the implant to the x-ray images. Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) was measured using long-leg radiographs to determine frontal plane alignment. Posterior tibial slope angle was calculated using radiographs. An independent sample t-test was used to explore differences between neutral (HKA:-2° to 2°), varus (≥2°) and valgus alignment (≤-2°) groups. Other measures were explored across the whole cohort using Pearson's correlations (SPSS V23). There was found to be no statistical difference between groups or correlations for HKA. The exploratory analysis found that tibial slope correlated with Superior/Inferior translation ROM during step up (r=−0.601, p<0.001) and step down (r=−.512, p=0.03) the position of the COR heading towards the lateral (r=−.479, p=0.006) during step down. Initial results suggest no relationship between frontal plane alignment and in-vivo. Exploratory analyses have found other relationships that are worthy of further research and may be important in optimizing function

End-stage osteoarthritis is characterised by pain and reduced physical function, for which total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognised to be a highly effective treatment. Most implants are multi radius in design, though modern kinematic theory suggests a single flexion/extension axis is located in the femur. A recently launched TKA implant (Triathlon, Stryker US), is based on this theory, adopting a single radius of curvature femoral component. It is hypothesised that this design allows better function, and specifically, that it results in enhanced efficiency of the quadriceps group through a longer patello-femoral moment arm. Change in power output was compared between single and multi radius implants as part of a larger ongoing randomised controlled trial to benchmark the new implant. Power output was assessed using a Leg Extensor Power Rig, well validated for use with this population, pre-operatively and at 6, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively in 101 Triathlon and 82 Kinemax implants. All patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis, and drawn from a single centre. Output was reported as maximal wattage (W) generated in a single leg extension, and expressed as a proportion of the contralateral limb power output to act as an internal control. The results are shown in the table below. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of TKA on the quadriceps power output, F = 249.09, p = <0.001 and also a significant interaction of the implant group on the output F = 11.33, p = 0.001. Independent samples t-tests of between group differences at the four assessment periods highlighted greater improvement in the single radius TKA group at all post-operative assessments (p <0.03), see table. The theoretical enhanced quadriceps efficiency conferred by single radius design was found in this study. Power output was significantly greater at all post-operative assessments in the single radius compared to the multi radius group. This difference was particularly relevant at early 6 week and 1 year assessment. Lower limb power output is known to link positively to functional ability. The results support the hypothesis that TKAs with a single radius design have enhanced recovery and better function

Previous research has shown an increase in chromosomal aberrations in patients with worn implants. The type of aberration depended on the type of metal alloy in the prosthesis. We have investigated the metal-specific difference in the level of DNA damage (DNA stand breaks and alkali labile sites) induced by culturing human fibroblasts in synovial fluid retrieved at revision arthroplasty.

All six samples from revision cobalt-chromium metal-on-metal and four of six samples from cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused DNA damage. By contrast, none of six samples from revision stainless-steel metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused significant damage. Samples of cobalt-chromium alloy left to corrode in phosphate-buffered saline also caused DNA damage and this depended on a synergistic effect between the cobalt and chromium ions.

Our results further emphasise that epidemiological studies of orthopaedic implants should take account of the type of metal alloy used.