Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 49 - 49
1 Dec 2020
Makelov B Gueorguiev B Apivatthakakul T
Full Access

Introduction. Being challenging, multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures in patients with severe soft tissue injuries and/or short stature can be treated using externalized locked plating. A recent finite element study, investigating the fixation stability of plated unstable tibial fractures with 2-mm, 22-mm and 32-mm plate elevation under partial and full weight-bearing, reported that from a virtual biomechanical point of view, externalized plating seems to provide appropriate relative stability for secondary bone healing under partial weight-bearing during the early postoperative phase. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of using a LISS plate as a definitive external fixator for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures. Methods. Following appropriate indirect reduction, externalized locked plating was performed and followed up in 12 patients with multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures with simple intraarticular involvement and injured soft tissue envelope. Results. Among all patients, the average follow up period was 22 months (range14–48 months), revealing uneventful healing in all of them. Time to fracture union was 21.8 weeks on average (range 16–28weeks). The mean HSS knee score was 87 (range 72–98) at 4 weeks postoperatively and 97 (range 88–100) at the final follow up. The average AOFAS score was 92 (range 84–100) at 4 weeks postoperatively and 98 (range 94–100) at the final follow up. Conclusions. Externalized locked plating seems to be a successful surgical alternative treatment in selected cases with unstable proximal tibial fractures and severe soft tissue injury, following appropriate indirect fracture reduction


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 80 - 80
1 Mar 2021
Arafa M
Full Access

Abstract. Objective. To compare the clinical and radiological outcome between less invasive stabilization system (LISS, Synthes, Paoli, PA.) and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures through the lateral approach. Background. Proximal tibial fractures present a difficult treatment challenge with historically high complication rates. ORIF has been in vogue for long time with good outcome. But these are associated with problems especially overlying skin conditions, delayed recovery and rehabilitation with limited functional outcome. LISS is an emerging procedure for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures. It preserves soft tissue and the periosteal circulation, which promotes fracture healing. Patients and methods. Thirty patients with closed proximal tibial fractures were included in this study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I (n=15) patients were treated by LISS and group II (n=15) by ORIF. Major characteristics of the two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, mode of injury, fracture location, and associated injuries. All patients were followed up at least 6 months. Results. In each group, 12 patients were united, 2 patients were non- united and one patient showed delayed union. The mean operative time in LISS patients was 79.3 min, while in ORIF patients; it was 122 min. All patients of LISS group were exposed to radiation, while only 40% of ORIF group were exposed. The mean time of union of LISS patients was 10.87weeks. While in ORIF patients, the mean time of union was 21.13 weeks. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the postoperative complications. Functional outcome was satisfactory in both groups. Conclusion. LISS achieves comparable results with ORIF in extraarticular fractures of the proximal tibia. Although LISS potentially has the radiation hazard, it reduces the perioperative complications with a shortened operation time and minimal soft tissue dissection. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 93 - 93
1 Apr 2018
Todorov D Gueorguiev B Zderic I Stoffel K Richards G Lenz M Enchev D Baltov A
Full Access

Introduction. The incidence of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population is growing and represents the second most common insufficiency fracture of the femur following fractures around the hip joint. Fixation of fractures in patients with poor bone stock and early mobilisation in feeble and polymorbide patients is challenging. Development of a fixation approach for augmentation of conventional LISS (less invasive stabilization system) plating may result in superior long-term clinical outcomes and enhance safe weight bearing. Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of two different techniques of augmented LISS plating for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur in comparison to conventional LISS plating. Materials & methods. Unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33-A3 was set in artificial femora with low density simulating osteoporotic bone. Three study groups, consisting of 10 specimens each, were created for instrumentation with a 9-hole LISS plate, a LISS plate with an additional 3D-printed polyactide cylindrical intramedullary graft, as well as a LISS plate plus a medial 3.5mm LCP (locking compression plate) - double plating. All specimens were non-destructively tested under axial (20–150N) and torsional (0–4Nm) quasi-static loading. Each construct was tested with two different working length (WL) configurations (long and short) of the LISS plate. Relative movements between the most medial superior and inferior osteotomy aspects were investigated via three-dimensional motion tracking analysis. Results. Interfragmentary displacement along the femur axis (mm) under 150N axial loading was 2.03±0.23/1.65±0.27 for LISS with long/short WL, 0.18±0.06/0.18±0.04 for double plating with long/short WL, and 0.40±0.05/0.30±0.05 for LISS plus graft with long/short WL. Shear interfragmentary displacement (mm) under 4Nm torsional loading in internal rotation was 1.16±0.17/0.92±0.11 for LISS with long/short WL, 0.40±0.10/0.43±0.07 for double plating with long/short WL, and 1.09±0.13/0.82±0.11 for LISS plus graft with long/short WL. Double plating revealed significantly smaller longitudinal and shear displacement compared to the other two techniques for long and short WL, respectively (P≤0.010). In addition, LISS plus graft fixation was with significantly less longitudinal displacement in comparison to conventional LISS plating for long and short WL, respectively (P≤0.001). Long WL resulted in significantly higher longitudinal and shear displacement compared to short WL for LISS and LISS plus graft (P≤0.032), but not for double plating (P=1.000). Conclusion. Intramedullary grafting resulted in significantly increased fracture stability under axial loading in comparison to conventional LISS plating. However, it was not efficient enough to achieve comparable stability to double plating


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 46 - 46
1 May 2012
Aziz A Hemmes B Khalid S Janzing H Meesters B Brink P
Full Access

Introduction. The treatment of distal femoral fractures has undergone several changes during the past century, from non-operative techniques to more recently minimally-invasive internal fixation. The Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) is an internal fixation plate that combines closed fixation of the distal femur using an anatomically pre-contoured plate with locked unicortical screws. Study aim. The purpose of this multicentre study was to review the use of the LISS plate in three regional centres with respect to fracture healing between different severities of fractures. Materials and methods. Patients treated with a LISS plate for a distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA Type 33A1 to 33C3) between 1st January 2004 and 1st June 2008 were recruited. Demographic data plus mechanism of injury, type of fracture, injury severity scores (ISS) and complications were documented. Subgroup statistical analysis using SPSS for Windows v. 17 was conducted to determine differences in the mean ISS, operating time, length of hospitalisation and ultimately, the time taken for union between groups of different fracture severities (Type 33A vs. Type 33C fractures). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results. Across the 3 regional centres, a total of 88 patients presented with a distal femoral fracture, of which 44 were treated with a LISS plate. The mean age of the patients was 66.1 (range 9 - 99), with 15 males and 29 females. There were 14 Type 33A1, 13 Type 33A2, 6 Type 33A3, 1 Type 33B2, 1 Type 33C1, 5 Type 33C2 and 4 Type 33C3 fractures. Union was achieved within an average of 14.7 weeks (range 8 - 25) in 33 cases. Five cases exhibited non-union and were managed by a retrograde nail or another locking compression plate. Six cases developed delayed union. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with Type 33C (n = 10) fractures presented with a significantly greater mean ISS score (12.7 vs. 10.0, p = 0.031), endured longer operating time (203.7 minutes vs. 125.8 minutes, p = 0.016) and spent longer in hospital compared to Type 33A (n = 33) fractures (35.3 days vs. 12.5 days, p = 0.004). However, no difference in the mean time for radiological union between the groups was observed (16.4 weeks vs. 13.6 weeks, p = 0.058). Discussion. We observed an overall success rate of 75% (33 out of 44 cases) as fractures reached radiological union within an average of 14.7 weeks. Interestingly, despite a greater mean ISS score and operating time among Type 33C fractures, the subgroup analysis confirmed that the LISS plate is a robust treatment option across all fracture severities, as this did not translate as longer time to union compared to Type 33A fractures. However, there were 5 cases of non-union and 6 cases of delayed union in our series. These may have arisen due to lack of precision in surgical technique, as we observed 8 cases of suboptimal implant positioning. Three cases involved distal screws lacking contact with the medial cortex of the femur. Overall, our data suggest a favourable outcome for the LISS plate in the treatment of distal femoral fractures


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 3 | Pages 426 - 432
1 Mar 2005
Mueller CA Eingartner C Schreitmueller E Rupp S Goldhahn J Schuler F Weise K Pfister U Suedkamp NP

The treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia is complex and makes great demands on the implants used. Our study aimed to identify what levels of primary stability could be achieved with various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the proximal tibia. Pairs of human tibiae were investigated. An unstable fracture was simulated by creating a defect at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Six implants were tested in a uniaxial testing device (Instron) using the quasi-static and displacement-controlled modes and the force-displacement curve was recorded. The movements of each fragment and of the implant were recorded video-optically (MacReflex, Qualysis). Axial deviations were evaluated at 300 N. The results show that the nailing systems tolerated the highest forces. The lowest axial deviations in varus and valgus were also found for the nailing systems; the highest axial deviations were recorded for the buttress plate and the less invasive stabilising system (LISS). In terms of rotational displacement the LISS was better than the buttress plate. In summary, it was found that higher loads were better tolerated by centrally placed load carriers than by eccentrically placed ones. In the case of the latter, it appears advantageous to use additive procedures for medial buttressing in the early phase