Background. Tension band epiphysiodesis for lower limb length discrepancy in children Planned physeal growth arrest (epiphysiodesis) for the treatment of limb length discrepancy (LLD) in growing children is a well described treatment modality in the literature. We describe our experience of temporary epiphysiodesis using a tension band technique with the “8-plate” in the treatment of LLD in growing children. Aim. The main objective of this study was to confirm whether bilateral 8-plates achieve an epiphysiodesis or not?. Methods and results. This is a prospective study of 27 patients who were treated with 8-plate epiphysiodesis for limb length discrepancy with a mean follow up of 28 months. Perthes disease was the most common underlying pathology for the LLD. The average preoperative LLD was 25.9 mm (15–49 mm). 17 patients successfully corrected to < 15 mm LLD, 5 patients corrected to between 15–20 mm and 5 patients did not correct to with in 15 mm LLD (22.2%). In those patients whom have corrected, the average correction length was 25.6 months with an average correction rate of 1.52 mm per month. There was a trend for insufficient equalisation if the procedure was performed < 1.5 years prior to skeletal maturity. The was also a trend for insufficient equalisation if performed at single physis only (femur or tibia). Complications included one superficial infection and one deep infection following plate removal at the end of treatment. Screw breakage was noticed in one patient. No long term complications were reported. No angular deformity was reported. Conclusion. This study has confirmed that bilateral 8 plates produce an epiphysiodesis. Failures are mainly due to late insertion or single physis usage. Future application depends on demonstrating reversibility when applied to younger children

Introduction

Circumferential periosteal release is a rarely reported procedure for paediatric limb lengthening. The technique involves circumferential excision of a strip of periosteum from the metaphysis of the distal femur, tibia and fibula. This study aims to determine the mid to long-term effectiveness of this technique.

Introduction. The reconstruction of the knee in growing children considers many options and the chosen solution is often patient (or surgeon) based. Megaprostheses represent a reliable solution but quite expensive in the non-invasive growing version and not free from complications. In an Italian reference center for Bone and Soft tissue sarcomas, following the experience of Rizzoli Institute in Bologna, we performed the reconstruction with a resurfaced allograft for the distal femur or the proximal tibia in selected patients. The aim of the study is to confirm the reliability of this technique and to identify its potential advantages and indications. Methods. Among 60 children below 16 years old with bone sarcomas (39 osteosarcomas, 21 Ewing's sarcomas, age range 4–16) treated since 2007, 35 cases were around the hip and the knee. 7 pediatric knees (age range 5–12 ys) with the tumor involving the epiphysis were reconstructed using a resurfaced allograft for distal femur (2) or proximal tibia (6) leaving intact the other half of the joint. Functional outcome (MSTS score), complication rate, and oncologic follow up were evaluated. Results. Oncologic follow up has been regularly conducted (range 2–9 years). No patient died of disease or developed a local recurrence. Two patients are alive with stable lung disease. Mean MSTS score was 32. No complications such as delayed union at the junction allograft-host bone, segmental deformities, fractures of the allograft, or infection have been observed. No prosthesis-related complications occurred. One limb length discrepancy with secondary scoliosis and 2 requiring a contralateral epiphysiodesis were also observed. Conclusions. In children older than 12 years old and with an expected lower limb discrepancy within 5 cm an adult megaprostheses eventually oversized is the gold standard; in children younger than 6 years old with an expected limb discrepancy longer than 10 cm the big choice is between an amputation (conventional or rotantionplasty) or a temporary reconstruction for the future implant of a growing megaprostheses. In the range 6–12 years old with an expected limb length discrepancy of 5–10 cm one of the options is the resurfaced allograft. It has been found a reliable solution in our case series with an excellent functional result probably derived from the capsule and ligaments reconstruction. Applying this protocol we observed a low mechanical-implant related complication rate. Comparing our results to Literature data of other techniques (induced membrane technique, distraction epiphysiolisis, custom-made or growing prostheses) we observed a lower reintervention rate. It is not possible to evaluate the infection rate among the different techniques used because of the low number of cases. A revision with a conventional first implant or revision total knee arthroplasty is always feasible reducing mechanical complications from megaprostheses. Further studies with longer follow up are mandatory to obtain an international consensus on reconstructive techniques in children with bone sarcomas around the knee

Introduction. EOS® is a low dose imaging system which allows the acquisition of coupled AP and lateral high-definition images while the patient is in standing position. HipEos has been developped to perform pre-surgical planning including hip implants selection and virtual positioning in functional weight-bearing 3D. The software takes advantage of the real size 3D patient anatomical informations obtained from the EOS exam. The aim of this preliminary study on 30 consecutive THP patients was to analyze the data obtained from HipEos planning for acetabular and femoral parameters and to compare them with pre and post-operative measurements on standing EOS images. Material and methods. Full body images were used to detect spino-pelvic abnormalities (scoliosis, pelvic rotation) and lower limbs discrepancies. One surgeon performed all THP using the same type of cementless implants (anterior approach, lateral decubitus). The minimum delay for post-op EOS controls was 10 months. A simulation of HipEos planning was performed retrospectively in a blinded way by the same surgeon after the EOS controls. All measurements were realized by an independent observer. Comparisons were done between pre and post-op status and the “ideal planning” taking in account the parameters for the restitution of joint offset and femur and global limb lengths according to the size of the selected implants. Regarding cup anteversion, the data included the anatomical anteversion (with reference to the anterior pelvic plane APP) and functionnal anteversion (according to the horizontal transverse plane in standing position). Results. The difference between pre-op and post-op APP angles is not statistically significant (p = 0.85), likewise for the sacral slope (p = 0.3). Thus, there has been no change in the orientation of the pelvis after THP. Comparing the two hips on post-op EOS data shows that the difference in femoral offset is not statistically significant (p = 0.76). However, the femoral length is statistically different (p <0.05) (mean 4mm, 0–12mm). The difference for femoral offset between HipEOS planning and post-op EOS data is not statistically significant (p = 0.58). However, the mean difference is significant (p <0.05) for femur length (5mm), inclination (5°) and anteversion of the cup. The mean post-op anatomic anteversion measured in the APP is 27°, whereas it is 11° with HipEOS planning. The mean functional anteversion of the cup on standing post-op EOS data is 35° while planning it is 17°. Otherwise, differences in femoral anteversion are not significant. Conclusion. The planning tools currently available include only the local anatomy of the hip for THP adjustment. This software integrates weight-bearing position, which allows to consider the impact of spine deformities and length discrepancies. This preliminary study is only retrospective, but it highlights the potential interest this “global planning” particularly for the optimization of acetabular anteversion and length adjustment according to pelvic tilt. Planning using the standing lateral view is interesting not only for visualization of the sagittal curvature of the femur and the detection of potential difficulties, but also for the visual data provided on the sagittal orientation of the cup

Introduction. Uncemented components necessitate accurate intraoperative assessment of size to avoid complications such as calcar fracture and subsidence whilst maintaining bone stock on the acetabular side. Potential problems can be anticipated pre-operatively with the use of a templating system. We proposed that pre-operative digital templating could accurately assess femoral and acetabular component size. Methods. Pre-operative templating data from 100 consecutive patients who received uncemented implants (Trident cup, Accolade stem) and who were operated on by the senior author were included in the study. Calibrated pelvis anterior-posterior X-rays were templated with Orthoview™ software. Demographic data, templating data (stem and cup size, femoral neck cut), operative records (actual stem and cup size, head size) and post-operative data (femoral stem alignment, radiographic leg length, acetabular cup abduction angle) were collected. Results. There were 51 males and 49 females with a mean age of 60 yrs (SD = 7.3 yrs). Seventy five percent of stems were templated to within 0.5 size and 98% to within 1 size. A total of 80% of cups were templated to within 2mm and 98% to within 4mm. 62% of head length was accurately template. Seven patients were converted from a templated 132° to a 127° femoral prosthesis neck angle. The acetabulum cup abduction angle was 45° (SD = 4.81) and stem alignment was 1.5° (SD = 1.13). The mean lower limb length discrepancy was +0.05mm (SD = 5.1 mm) post-operatively. Conclusion. Digital templating is a accurate method of assessing femoral and acetabular component sizes. This allows surgeons to foresee potential problems and also recognize an intra-operative error when a large discrepancy exists between a trial component and the templated size