Abstract. Aim. This study aims to Inter and intra observer reliability compare, use of a standard goniometer (SG) to measure intermetacarpal angle (degrees) vs use of a new technique of using a digital vernier calliper (DVC) (mm) to measure the distance between the first and second metacarpal head. Method. Maximal active abduction and extension of both thumbs was measured in 20 healthy volunteers on two occasions at least one week apart by two assessors. Results. The inter and intra-observer agreement was higher & the variance of the data was lower using the DVC with the new technique than the SG for both thumb abduction and extension. Additionally, the correlation between measurement of extension and abduction was higher using the DVC than the SG. Conclusion. Whilst both tools provide acceptable intra and inter-observer agreement, the new technique using a DVC is consistently better and more reliable than a SG in measuring thumb abduction and extension. The study also supports our hypothesis that the thumb rotates around the second metacarpal head with a consistent radius

Aims. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. Methods. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score. Results. Ten patients completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant, and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a five-point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3 to 5.0), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7 to 5.0) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10 to 11 years old). Conclusion. The current SLRS has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This suggests face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision, and criterion validity of the score in this patient group. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):705–709

As the field of hip arthroscopy continues to develop, functional measures and testing become increasingly important in patient selection, managing patient expectations prior to surgery, and physical readiness for return to athletic participation. The Hip Sport Test (HST) was developed to assess strength, coordination, agility, and range of motion prior to and following hip arthroscopy as a functional assessment. However, the relationship between HST and hip strength, range of motion, and hip-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measures have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the HST scores and measurements of hip strength and range of motion prior to undergoing hip arthroscopy. Between September 2009 and January 2017, patients aged 18-40 who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement with available pre-operative HST, dynamometry, range of motion, and functional scores (mHHS, WOMAC, HOS-SSS) were identified. Patients were excluded if they were 40 years old, had a Tegner activity score < 7, or did not have HST and dynamometry evaluations within one week of each other. Muscle strength scores were compared between affected and unaffected side to establish a percent difference with a positive score indicating a weaker affected limb and a negative score indicating a stronger affected limb. Correlations were made between HST and strength testing, range of motion, and PROs. A total of 350 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 26.9 ± 6.5 years, with 34% females and 36% professional athletes. Total and component HST scores were significantly associated with measure of strength most strongly for flexion (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001), extension (rs = −0.24, p<.001) and external rotation (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001). Lateral and diagonal agility, components of HST, were also significantly associated with muscle strength imbalances between internal rotation versus external rotation (rs = −0.18, p=0.01) and flexion versus extension (rs = 0.12, p=0.03). In terms of range of motion, a significant correlation was detected between HST and internal rotation (rs = −0.19, p < 0 .001). Both the total and component HST scores were positively correlated with pre-operative mHHS, WOMAC, and HOS-SSS (p<.001 for all rs). The Hip Sport Test correlates with strength, range of motion, and PROs in the preoperative setting of hip arthroscopy. This test alone and in combination with other diagnostic examinations can provide valuable information about initial hip function and patient prognosis

Introduction. LIMB-Q Kids is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children with Lower limb differences (LLDs). The objective is to conduct an international field test study. Materials & Methods. A mixed method multiphase approach was used to develop LIMB-Q Kids. In phase one, a systematic review was conducted to identify concepts from existing PROMs used in research with children with LLDs. A preliminary conceptual framework derived from the systematic review informed an international qualitative study. The data from qualitative interviews were used to form the LIMB-Q Kids, which was further refined through multiple rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews with children. Input was obtained from parents and healthcare professionals from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, India, UK, and the USA. LIMB-Q Kids was translated and culturally adapted into multiple languages. Results. The final field-test version consists of 11 scales (159 items) that measure appearance, physical function, symptoms (hip, knee, ankle, foot, and leg), leg-related distress, and school, social and psychological function. This version was rigorously translated into Danish and German. Translations that are in progress include Arabic, Finnish, Hindi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, and Luganda. An international field-test study is underway in nine countries (15 sites with a target recruitment of 150 participants per country). At the time of abstract submission, 190 patients from seven sites have completed LIMB-Q Kids. The UK collaborative has worked on language adaption for the UK and is currently validating the score across five paediatric limb reconstruction units. Conclusions. No internationally applicable PROM exists for children with LLDs. We present the current progress in developing and validating such a score. Data from the international field-test study will be used to reduce items and perform psychometric testing of LIMB-Q Kids. The rigorous translation and cultural adaption process will provide versions of LIMB-Q Kids in different languages. Once completed, the LIMB-Q Kids will provide a common metric for outcome assessment for children with lower limb differences internationally

Aims. Patient-reported outcome measures have become an important part of routine care. The aim of this study was to determine if Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures can be used to create patient subgroups for individuals seeking orthopaedic care. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study of patients from Duke University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery clinics (14 ambulatory and four hospital-based). There were two separate cohorts recruited by convenience sampling (i.e. patients were included in the analysis only if they completed PROMIS measures during a new patient visit). Cohort #1 (n = 12,141; December 2017 to December 2018,) included PROMIS short forms for eight domains (Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Depression, Anxiety, Sleep Quality, Participation in Social Roles, and Fatigue) and Cohort #2 (n = 4,638; January 2019 to August 2019) included PROMIS Computer Adaptive Testing instruments for four domains (Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Sleep Quality). Cluster analysis (K-means method) empirically derived subgroups and subgroup differences in clinical and sociodemographic factors were identified with one-way analysis of variance. Results. Cluster analysis yielded four subgroups with similar clinical characteristics in Cohort #1 and #2. The subgroups were: 1) Normal Function: within normal limits in Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Sleep Quality; 2) Mild Impairment: mild deficits in Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Sleep Quality but with Depression within normal limits; 3) Impaired Function, Not Distressed: moderate deficits in Physical Function and Pain Interference, but within normal limits for Depression and Sleep Quality; and 4) Impaired Function, Distressed: moderate (Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Sleep Quality) and mild (Depression) deficits. Conclusion. These findings suggest orthopaedic patient subgroups differing in physical function, pain, and psychosocial distress can be created from as few as four different PROMIS measures. Longitudinal research is necessary to determine whether these subgroups have prognostic validity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):493–502

Increased collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in registries enables international comparison of patient-centered outcomes after knee and hip replacement. We aimed to investigate 1) variations in PROM improvement, 2) the possible confounding factor of BMI, and 3) differences in comorbidity distributions between registries. Registries affiliated with the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) or OECD membership countries were invited to report aggregate EQ-5D, OKS, OHS, HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS values. Eligible patients underwent primary total, unilateral knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis within three years and had completed PROMs preoperatively and either 6 or 12 months postoperatively, excluding patients with subsequent revisions. For each PROM cohort, Chi-square tests were performed for BMI distributions across registries and 12 predefined PROM strata (male/female, age 20-64/65-74/>75, high or low preoperative PROM scores). Comorbidity distributions were reported for available comorbidity indexes. Thirteen registries from 9 countries contributed data, n~130000 knee (range 140 to 79848) and n~113000 hip (range 137 to 85281). Mean EQ-5D index values (10 registries) ranged from 0.53 to 0.71 (knee) and 0.50 to 0.70 (hips) preoperatively and 0.78 to 0.85 (knee) and 0.83 to 0.87 (hip) postoperatively. Mean OKS (6 registries) ranged from 19.3 to 23.6 preoperatively and 36.2 to 41.2 postoperatively. Mean OHS (7 registries) ranged from 18.0 to 23.2 preoperatively and 39.8 to 44.2 postoperatively. Four registries reported KOOS-PS and three reported HOOS-PS. Proportions of patients with BMI >30 ranged from 35 to 62% (10 knee registries) and 16 to 43% (11 hip registries). For both knee and hip registries, distributions of patients across six BMI categories differed significantly among registries (p30 were for patients in the youngest age groups (20 to 64 and 65 to 74 years) with the lowest baseline scores. Additionally, females with lowest preoperative PROM scores had highest BMI. These findings were echoed for the OHS and OKS cohorts. Proportions of patients with ASA scores ≥3 ranged from 7 to 42% (9 knee registries) and 6 to 35% (8 hip registries). PROM-score improvement varies between international registries, which may be partially explained by differences in age, sex and preoperative scores. BMI and comorbidity may be relevant to adjust for

Introduction. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and often lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. Materials and Methods. The SLRS was designed following the use of structured interviews with a group of patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses and physiotherapists. This has undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on 10 patients who have been through the process of limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability. Results. Ten patients have completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. All patients found the score acceptable to complete in the time while waiting in clinic. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a 5 point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3–5), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7–5) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesh-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10–11 years old). Conclusions. The current Stanmore limb reconstruction score has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. This demonstrates face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision and criterion validity of the score in this patient group

In the setting of traumatic elbow injuries involving coronoid fractures, the relative size of the coronoid fragment has been shown to relate to the stability of the joint. Currently, the challenge lies in accurately classifying the amount of bone loss in coronoid fractures. In comminuted fractures, bone loss is difficult to measure with plain radiographs or computed tomography. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel radiographic measure, the Coronoid Opening Angle (COA), on lateral elbow radiographs. We demonstrate the relationship of the COA to coronoid height and describe how this measure can be used to estimate bone loss and potentially predict elbow instability following coronoid fracture. Radiographs were drawn from a regional database in a consecutive fashion. Candidate radiographs were excluded on the basis of radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, previous surgery or injury, bony deformity, and inadequate lateral view of the elbow. The COA was measured as the angle between the long axis of the ulna at the level of the trochlear notch, and the tip of coronoid, from a common origin at the posterior cortex of the olecranon. Images were reviewed by a fellowship trained upper extremity surgeon, an upper extremity fellow, and a junior resident. Normal COA, coronoid height, and calculated COA at varying amounts of bone loss were calculated by three reviewers. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how the COA can most effectively predict bone loss at varying coronoid heights. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for 39 subjects. Seventy-two subjects were included for analysis (M=40, F=32). The normal coronoid opening angle is 33.19 degrees [32.2 – 34.2]. Coronoid height is 18.8 mm [18.1 – 19.6]. Extrapolating this baseline data, the COA at 20%, 33%, and 50% of coronoid bone loss was calculated to be 27.5, 23.5, and 18 degrees, respectively. ICC was found to be 0.90 or higher. Cutoff values were determined to maximize the sensitivity of the COA. A cutoff value of 21 degrees has a 92% sensitivity in detecting a minimum of 50% bone loss. The COA with similar sensitivity in predicting 20% and 33% bone loss are 32 and 27 degrees. The coronoid opening angle is a novel technique that can be used on a lateral elbow radiograph to predict the minimum coronoid bone loss. This can be used to guide clinical decision making and potentially predict instability. Future research will aim to validate this tool in the clinical setting in predicting instability

Introduction. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is currently the gold standard to measure early prosthetic migration which can predict aseptic loosening. However, RSA has some limitations such as the need for perioperative placed markers and exposure to X-radiation during follow up. Therefore, this study evaluates if low field MRI could be an alternative for RSA. Low field MRI was chosen because it is less hampered by metal artifacts of the prosthesis than high field MRI. Methods. 3D models of both the tibial component of a total knee prosthesis (Genesis II, Smith and Nephew) and the porcine tibia were made. The tibial component was implanted in the tibial bone. Consequently, 17 acquisitions with the low field MRI scanner (Esaote G-scan 0.25T) in transverse direction with a 2D PD weighted metal artifact reducing sequence PD-XMAR (TE/TR 10/1020ms, slice thickness 3mm, FOV 180×180×120 mm³, matrix size 224×224) were made. The first five acquisitions were made without repositioning the cadaver, the second twelve after slightly repositioning the cadaver within limits that are expected to be encountered in a clinical setting. Hence, in these 17 acquisitions no prosthetic-bone motions were induced. The scans were segmented and registered with Mimics. Virtual translation and rotation of the prosthesis with respect to the bone between two scans were calculated using a Procrustes algorithm. The first five scans without repositioning were used to calculate the measurement error, the following twelve to calculate the precision of low field MRI to measure prosthetic migration. Results were expressed as the maximum total point motion, mean error and 95% CI and expressed in boxplots. Results. The error of the method to measure the prosthetic position without repositioning has a mean translation between 0.09 and 0.22mm with a 95%CI between 0.30 and 0.46mm. The mean rotation was between 0.02° and 0.11° with a 95%CI between 0.18° and 0.32° with a MTPM of 0.45mm. The precision of low field MRI to measure migration with repositioning has a mean translation between 0.02 and 0.12mm with a 95%CI between 1.16mm and 1.86mm. The mean rotation was between 0.01° and 0.15° with a 95%CI between 1.78° and 3.26° with a MTPM of 2.35mm. The overall registration error was largest in the distal-proximal direction. Discussion. At the moment the low field MRI technique is not as accurate as this gold standard RSA. The accuracy of RSA varies between 0.05 and 0.5 mm for translation and 0.15 ° to 1.15 ° for rotation (95% confidence intervals). However, results are comparable with markerless RSA studies. The largest measurement error was found in the distal-proximal direction, which can be explained by the through-plane resolution of 3 mm, which is larger than the in-plane resolution of 0.8×0.8 mm². Future research should focus on improving resolution in the distal-proximal direction which would improve the precision. Moreover, an actual migration study should be performed to proof the true value of this low field MRI base markerless and X-radiation free alternative to measure prosthetic migration

Background. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) provides patients with significant improvements in quality of life. Subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are traditionally used to measure preoperative functional status and postoperative outcomes. However, there are limitations to PROMs. In particular, they provide virtually no functional information in the first 3 weeks after surgery, which could be used to guide the patient's recovery. Newly available wearable electronic sensors make it possible to: 1) measure important functional outcomes following TKA; 2) guide the patient's physical therapy (PT); and 3) provide real-time functional and clinical information to the provider. Compliance with PT after TKA is a challenge. Patients cite time, transportation, and cost as deterrents to PT appointments. However, an intensive PT program is essential in TKA. Surface sensor devices may be able to increase PT compliance by guiding patients through exercises at home. Additionally, these devices can transmit PT progress in real-time to the providers, allowing them to monitor and assist the patient's recovery. Our study investigates the feasibility of using a surface sensor device (TracPatch™) on patients following TKA. We sought to answer the following questions: 1) Will patients tolerate the device; 2) Will patients comply with device instructions; 3) Will patients be able to use the smart phone application; 4) Will the device collect, transmit, and store data as it was designed? We believe these fundamental questions must be answered as we enter the era of personal sensor-measured functional outcomes. Methods. 20 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA were enrolled in this IRB approved study. At the pre-surgical visit, patients were given instructions for the device and smart phone application. Each patient used the device in the week prior to surgery, and data was collected. The device was again applied in the operating room. For 3 weeks post-operatively, the device collected functional data, along with WOMAC, OKS, KSS, PROMIS, and VAS pain scores. A satisfaction survey was collected on the device. Results. The study results emphasize the importance of clear device instructions. Using the sensor and phone application prior to surgery was very helpful. The device was surprisingly well tolerated. Older patients were able to use the device without significant difficulty. Virtually all patients found the device helpful and, often fun. Physical therapists felt that the devices helped personalize the therapy program. The functional information from the device was much more helpful in guiding care in the first 3 weeks following surgery than PROM scores. Conclusion. It is anticipated that sensor devices of the kind tested in this study will have a major impact on the care of TKA patients. The purpose of this study was not to measure that impact. Our goal was to examine the factors that optimize the use of these devices. It is critical that clear device instructions be given to patients. Office procedures must be established to monitor use of the devices. If protocols are established for their use, surface sensors have the potential to provide invaluable information to TKA patients and caregivers

Aim. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents significant challenges to healthcare systems globally. Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their close contact with patients in both outpatient and theatre environments. The aim of this review was to perform a literature review, including articles of other coronaviruses, to formulate guidelines for orthopaedic healthcare staff. Methods. A search of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organization (WHO), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) databases was performed encompassing a variety of terms including ‘coronavirus’, ‘covid-19’, ‘orthopaedic’, ‘personal protective environment’ and ‘PPE’. Online database searches identified 354 articles. Articles were included if they studied any of the other coronaviruses or if the basic science could potentially applied to COVID-19 (i.e. use of an inactivated virus with a similar diameter to COVID-19). Two reviewers independently identified and screened articles based on the titles and abstracts. 274 were subsequently excluded, with 80 full-text articles retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 were excluded as they compared personal protection equipment to no personal protection equipment or referred to prevention measures in the context of bacterial infections. Results. There is a paucity of high quality evidence surrounding COVID-19. This review collates evidence from previous coronavirus outbreaks to put forward recommendations for orthopaedic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key findings have been summarized and interpreted for application to the orthopaedic operative setting. Conclusion. For COVID-19 positive patients, minimum suggested PPE includes N95 respirator, goggles, face shield, gown, double gloves, and surgical balaclava. Space suits not advised. Be trained in the correct technique of donning and doffing PPE. Use negative pressure theatres if available. Minimize aerosolization and its effects (smoke evacuation and no pulse lavage). Minimize further unnecessary patient-staff contact (dissolvable sutures, clear dressings, split casts)

INTRODUCTION. Deformation of modular acetabular press-fit shells is a topic of much interest for surgeons and manufacturer. Such modular components utilise a titanium shell with a liner manufactured from metal, polyethylene or ceramic. Initial fixation is achieved through a press-fit between shell and acetabulum with the shell mechanically deforming upon insertion. Shell deformation may disrupt the assembly process of inserting the bearing liner into the acetabular shell for modular systems. This may adversely affect the integrity and durability of the components and the tribology of the bearing. OBJECTIVE. Most clinically relevant data to quantify and understand such shell deformation can be achieved by cadaver measurements. ATOS Triple Scan III was identified as a measurement system with the potential to perform those measurements. The study aim was to validate an ATOS Triple Scan III optical measurement system against a co-ordinate measuring machine (CMM) using in-vitro testing and to check capability/ repeatability under cadaver lab conditions. METHODS. Two sizes of custom-made acetabular shells were deformed using a uniaxial/ two-point loading frame and measured repeatedly at different loads. Roundness measurements were performed using both the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system and a co-ordinate measuring machine and then compared. The repeatability was also tested by measuring shells pre and post insertion in a cadaver lab multiple times. RESULTS. The in-vitro comparison with CMM demonstrated a maximum difference of 5 µm at the rim and 9 µm at the measurement point closest to the pole of the shell. Deviation between the two systems increased towards the pole for the in-vitro measurements. However as press fit shells are designed to be loaded at the rim, this is likely where the maximum deflection will occur as a result of the highest force. Therefore, the increased difference between the systems towards the pole is of less importance compared with accuracy at the rim. Maximum repeatability was below 1 µm for the CMM and 3 µm for the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system. Repeatability of the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system was comparable between pre insertion (below 2 µm) and post insertion (below 3 µm) measurements in the cadaver lab. In addition these values were comparable to the repeatability measured during the in-vitro validation study (below 3 µm). This proves high repeatability not only for in-vitro conditions, but also for the cadaver lab as well. CONCLUSIONS. This study supports the view that the ATOS Triple Scan III optical system fulfils the necessary requirements to accurately measure shell deformation in cadavers. As a result, the authors propose further studies using cadavers to identify the impact of other factors upon shell deformation. Other factors to be measured include bone strength, shell diameter, under reaming and wall thickness

Introduction. Failure of total knee replacements due to the generation of polyethylene wear debris remains a crucial issue in orthopedics. Unlike the hip, it is difficult to accurately determine knee implant wear rates from retrieved components. Several studies have relied on thickness measurements to estimate penetration, but the complicated geometry of contemporary tibial liners poses a challenge to accurately assess wear. In this study we address the question whether linear penetration can serve as a surrogate measure for volumetric material loss. Methods. Eighty-one retrieved UHMWPE NexGen cruciate-retaining tibial liners (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) with an average time in situ of 5.27±2.89 years were included in the study. Metrology data for the surfaces of the tibial liners were obtained with a coordinate measuring machine (OGP, Rochester, NY). Using a laser scanner with two micrometer depth accuracy, at least 400,000 measurement points were taken by investigator #1. Areal thickness changes were mapped for the lateral and medial sides with the help of an autonomous mathematical reconstruction algorithm and volume loss was calculated based on wear scar area and local thickness change. Investigator #2, blinded from these results, measured the minimum thickness of the medial and lateral tibial plateau using a dial indicator with a spherical tip radius of 3mm. Twenty-three short term retrievals (3 to 4 per implant size), removed due to infection and without any signs of wear, served as “unused” reference. Linear penetration was then calculated by subtracting the minimum thickness of each plateau from the average thickness of the reference components. Results. The autonomous reconstruction algorithm delivered results for all investigated components and wear maps could be generated in 100% of the cases. There was a linear association between volume loss and time in situ for the medial and lateral tibial plateau, respectively (R2=0.23, p<0.001 and R2=0.32, p<0.001; Fig. 1). The calculated wear rates were 6.89±1.33 medially and 6.91±1.11 mm3/year laterally with an average total wear rate of 13.81±2.04 mm3/year. Also linear penetration correlated with time in situ (R2=0.19, p<0.001). The annual linear penetration was 0.03±0.01 mm/yr medially and 0.03±0.01 mm/yr laterally. Linear penetration and volumetric loss correlated significantly for both the medial and lateral sides (R2= 0.46 re. R2= 0.22; p <0.001); however, the specific uncertainty for each component was relatively high with ±60 mm3 medially and ±63 mm3 laterally as suggested by the 95% single point prediction interval of the correlation. Discussion. There is a reasonable global correlation between linear penetration and volume loss. However, the uncertainty in obtaining a wear volume from an individual penetration value is relatively high. For example a penetration of 0.5 mm on the medial side correlates to a wear volume of 40 to 160 mm3. The large uncertainty might be because the location of the thickness minimum after wear does no longer coincide with the manufactured minimum of this device (Fig. 2). In conclusion, the results suggest that penetration is not a good surrogate measure for estimating wear volume of individual TKR polyethylene components, but might be a useful surrogate for large cohort studies

The standard approach for kinematic analysis of knee joints has been roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA). This approach requires implanting tantalum beads during surgery so pre- and post-surgery comparisons have not been conducted. CT- fluoroscopy registration is a non-invasive alternative but has had accuracy and speed limitations. Our new algorithm addresses these limitations. Our approach to the problem of registering CT data to single-plane fluoroscopy was to generate a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) from the CT data and then filter this to produce an edge-enhanced image, which was then registered with an edge-enhanced version of the fluoroscopy frame. The algorithm includes a new multi-modal similarity measure and a novel technique for the calculation of the required gradients. Three lower limb specimens were implanted with 1 mm tantalum beads to act as fiducial markers. Fluoroscopy data was captured for a knee flexion and femur and tibia CT data was registered to the fluoroscopy images. A previous version of our algorithm (developed in 2008) showed good accuracy for in-plane translations and rotations of the knee bones. However, this algorithm did not have the ability to accurately determine out-of-plane translations. This lack of accuracy for out-of-plane translations has also been the major limitation of other single-plane 2D-3D registration algorithms. Fregly et. al. and Dennis et. al. reported standard deviations for this measurement of 5.6 and 3.03 mm respectively. The latest version of our algorithm achieves error standard deviations for out-of-plane translations of 0.65 mm. The algorithm includes a new similarity measure, which calculates the sum of the conditional variances (SCV) of the joint probability distributions of the images to be registered. This new similarity measure determines the true 3D position of the bones for a wider range of initial disparities and is also faster than the cross-cumulative residual entropy (CCRE) measure used in the 2008 version. For a set of initial 3D positions ranging from ± 5 pixels and ± 5 degrees the proposed approach successfully determined the correct 3D position for 96% of cases–whilst the approach using CCRE was successful for only 49% of cases. The algorithm also required 60% less iterations than the previous CCRE approach. The new registration algorithm developed for the project provides a level of accuracy that is superior to other similar techniques. This new level of accuracy opens the way for a non-invasive mechanism for sophisticated kinematic analysis of knee joints. This will enable prospective, longitudinal and controlled studies of reconstruction surgery

Objectives. This study examines variations in knee arthroplasty patient reported outcome measures according to patient age. Methods. We analysed prospectively collected outcome data (OKS, Eq5D, satisfaction, and revision) on 2456 primary knee arthroplasty patients. Patients were stratified into defined age groups (< 55, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and ≥85 years). Oxford Knee Score and Eq5D were analysed pre-operatively, and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. Absolute scores and post-operative change in scores were calculated and compared between age groups. Satisfaction scores (0–100) were analysed at 6 months post-operatively. Linear, logistic and ordinal regression modelling was used to describe the association between age and outcomes, for continuous, binary and ordinal outcomes, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to describe revision rates at 2 years. Results. Patients aged 65–85 years demonstrated better preoperative status than those aged under 65 (OKS, p=0.03; Eq5D, p=0.048), and over 85 years (OKS, p=0.03). Postoperatively, no significant difference in OKS or Eq5D was observed between age groups. Postoperative change in score showed a linear trend for a greater post-operative change in younger patients at 6-months and 2-years (p< 0.04). Overall satisfaction score was 84.9, but patient satisfaction was significantly lower in those aged < 55 years compared to all other age groups (78.1 Vs. 84.8, p=0.031). Cumulative overall 2-year revision rate was 1.3%. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that good early outcomes, as measured by the OKS and Eq5D, can be anticipated following knee replacement regardless of the patient's age, although younger patients gain greater improvement. However, the lower satisfaction in those aged < 55 years is a concern and suggests that outcome is not fully encapsulated by the OKS and Eq5D alone. This raises the question as to whether the OKS alone is an appropriate measure of pain and function in the younger, more active population

Background. The factors that are considered to be associated with successful clinical outcome fallowing cervical arthroplasty surgery are patient selection, absence of facet joint changes and lack of pre-operative kyphosis. Even though many studies have cited the pre-operative demographic details of their patient groups, the effect of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, social benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome measures have not been reported. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of pre-operative patient characteristics on the clinical outcomes following cervical disc replacement. Methods. We included 126 patients who underwent single or multiple level cervical arthroplasty in our unit were included in the study. The clinical outcome measures such as Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP); Neck disability Index (NDI), Hospital depression and anxiety scale and Bodily pain component of Short Form 36 questionnaires (SF-36 P) were recorded pre and post operatively. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Results. There were 60 males and 63 females. Average duration of follow up was 18 months (Range 10–51). Out of 123 patients, 37 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 25 patients gave history of smoking, 64 were actively working at the time of operation and 27 were receiving social benefits. We have found that gender; smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. Conclusion. This is has been a first ever attempt to analyse the affect these psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following cervical arthroplasty. In our study, contrary to studies related lumbar surgeries, we conclude that there is no statistically significant contribution of associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes in the early follow up period

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and WOMAC are examples of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have well documented ceiling effects, with many patients clustered close to full marks following arthroplasty. Any arthroplasty that offers superior function would therefore fail to be detectable using these metrics. Two recent well conducted randomised clinical trials made exactly this error, by using OHS and WOMAC to detect a differences in outcome between hip resurfacing and hip arthroplasty despite published data already showing in single arm studies that these two procedures score close to full marks using both PROMS. We had observed that patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) were able to walk faster and with more normal stride length than patients with well performing hip replacements, but that these objective differences in gait were not captured by PROMs. In an attempt to capture these differences, we developed a patient centred outcome measure (PCOM) using a method developed by Philip Noble's group. This allows patients to select the functions that matter to them personally against which the success of their own operation will be measured. Our null hypothesis was that this PCOM would be no more successful than the OHS in discriminating between types of hip arthroplasty. 22 patients with a well performing Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty were identified. These were closely matched by age, sex, BMI, height, preop diagnosis with 22 patients with a well performing conventional THA. Both were compared with healthy controls using the novel PCOM and in a gait lab. Results. PROMs for the two groups were similar, while HRA scored higher in the PCOM. The 9% difference was significant (p<0.05). At top walking speed, HRA were 10% faster, with a 9% longer stride length. Discussion. Outcome measures should be able to detect differences that are clinically relevant to patients and their surgeons. The currently used hip scores are not capable of delivering this distinction, and assume that most hip replacements are effectively perfect. While the function of hip replacements is indeed very good, with satisfaction rates high, objective measures of function are essential for innovators who are trying to deliver improved functional outcome. The 9% difference in PCOM found in this small study reflects the higher activity levels reported by many, and of similar magnitude to the 10% difference in top walking speed, despite no detectable difference in conventional PROMS. PCOMs may offer further insight into differences in function. For investigators who wish to develop improvements to hip arthroplasty, PCOMs and objective measures of gait may describe differences that matter more to patients than conventional hip scores

INTRODUCTION. The glenoid version assessment is crucial step for any Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) procedure. New methods to compute 3D version angle of the glenoid have been proposed. These methods proposed different definitions of the glenoid plane and only used 3 points to define each plane on the 3D model of the scapula. In practice, patients often come to consultation with their CT-scans. In order to reduce the x-ray dose, the scapulae are often truncated on the inferior part. In these cases, the traditional scapula plane cannot be calculated. We hypothesised that a new plane definition, of the scapula and the glenoid, that takes into account all the 3D points, would have the least variation and provide more reliable measures whatever the scapula is truncated or not. The purpose of the study is to introduce new fully automatic method to compute 3D glenoid version for TSA preoperating planning and test its results on artificially truncated scapulae. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Volumetric preoperative CT datasets have been used to derive a surface model shape of the shoulder. The glenoid surface is detected and a 3D version and inclination angle of the glenoid surface are computed. We propose a new reference plane of the scapula without picking points on the 3D model. The method is based on the mathematical skeleton of the scapula and the least squares plane fitting. Specific software has been developed to apply the plane fitting in addition the automatic segmentation process. An orthopedic surgeon defined the traditional scapular plane based on 3 points and applied the measures on 12 patients. The manual process has been repeated 3 times and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to compare the results with our automatic method. To validate the reliability of the new plane relating to truncated scapulae, we have measured the 3D orientation variation on 37 scapulae. Nine iterations have been applied on each scapula by cutting 5mm of the scapular inferior part. RESULTS. The ICC of the scapula plane orientation for the three orientation components (x, y, z) were 0.98, 0.99 and 0.89 respectively. The reliability results applied by cutting the inferior side show good results with means: 0.01±0.01 mm, 0.01±0.01 mm and 0.02±0.02 mm for X, Y, Z respectively. CONCLUSION. New referential scapular plane has been proposed to compute 3D glenoid version. The method is fully automatic and doesn't need manual positioning of points on the 3D points. The orientation of the new plane is correlated with the standard scapular plane. The study showed that plane orientation is reasonably constant while truncating the scapula body till 45mm of cut on the inferior and the medial side. This is the only study that proposes a reference plane for truncated scapula

Introduction. The safe zone of the acetabular cup for THA was discussed based on the AP X-ray films of hip joints. A supine position is still used to determine the cup position for CAOS such as navigation systems. There were few data about the implant positions after THA in standing positions. The EOS X-Ray Imaging Acquisition System (EOS system) (EOS imaging Inc, Paris, France) allows image acquisition with the patients in a standing or sitting position. We can obtain AP and lateral X-ray images with high-quality resolution and low dose radiation exposure. Recently, we have obtained the EOS system for the first time in Japan. We investigated 3D accuracy of the EOS system for implant measurements after THA. Patients and Methods. We measured the implant angles of the 68 patients (59 females and 9 males, average age: 61y.o.) who underwent THA using the EOS system. The cup inclination and anteversion were measured in the anterior pelvic plane (APP) coordinate. The femoral stem antetorsion was defined as angles between the stem neck axis and the posterior condylar axis. These data were compared with the implant angles of the same patients measured by the post-operative CT scan images and the 3D image analysis using the ZedHip software (LEXI, Japan). Results. The cup inclinations (average ±SE) measured by the EOS system and the CT scan were 40.6 ± 0.64° and 42.9 ± 0.53°, respectively. The cup anteversions were 22.9 ± 1.3° and 22.8 ± 1.0°, respectively. The stem antetorsions were 28.9 ± 1.3° and 29.8 ± 1.6°, respectively. The differences (average ± SE) between the EOS system and the CT scan in the cup inclination, the cup anteversion, and the stem antetorsion were −2.3 ± 0.38°, −0.09 ± 0.82°, and −0.90 ± 0.91°, respectively. There were strong correlations in measurement values between the EOS system and the CT scan (the Spearman's correlation coefficients of the cup inclination, the cup anteversion, and the stem antetorsion were 0.6521 [p<0.001], 0.7154 [p<0.001], and 0.8645 [p<0.001], respectively). Discussion. The EOS system provides acceptable clinical accuracies in measuring acetabular cup and femoral stem angles after THA. The accuracy of the cup angles was accorded with that of the basic experimental data using a dry pelvis. Our data also demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy in the measurement of stem antetorsion. This system can provide accurate snap shots of variable postures with high resolution. Using the EOS system, we may establish real optimum positions of THA implants by measuring the patients after THA in several postures including standing, squatting or sitting positions which required for Japanese ADL

Each in vivo wear measurement method for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has strengths and weaknesses. The authors have developed a new manual wear measurement method (PowerPoint [PP] method) and validated that the PP method was found to have better repeatability, reproducibility and pick up differences in the radiographs than the previously established manual wear measurement methods. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the PP method by retrieval study. 17 retrieved polyethylene (PE) liners (16 patients) were enrolled in this study. The wear volumes of retrieved PE liners from clinical radiographs were calculated by the PP and Dorr and Wan method and they were compared with the wear volume of retrieved PE liners calculated by the triangulation three-dimensional (3D) laser scan. Spearman correlation coefficients results between PP method and 3D laser scan revealed excellent correlations (0.89 to 0.93). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients values of the PP method showed excellent correlations (0.95 to 1.00). We suggest that the PP method will be a viable new technique for measuring wear of THA and a supplement method when computerized methods are not available