INTRODUCTION. Ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing offers a bone conserving treatment for more active patients without the potential metal ion risks associated with resurfacing devices. The Biolox Delta ceramic material has over 15 years of clinical history with low wear and good biocompatibility but has been limited previously in total hip replacement to 48mm diameter bearings [1]. Further increasing the diameter for resurfacing bearings and removing the metal shell to allow for direct fixation of the ceramic cup may increase the wear of this material and increase the risk of fracture. METHODS. Eighteen implants (ReCerf™, MatOrtho, UK; Figure1) were wear tested; six were ⊘40mm (small) and twelve ⊘64mm (large). All small and six large implants were tested under ISO 14242 standard conditions for 5 million cycles (mc) at 30° inclination (45° clinically). The six remaining large implants were tested under
Introduction:.
Introduction. Translational surgical mismatch in the centres of rotation of the femoral head and acetabular cup in hip joint replacements can lead to dynamic
INTRODUCTION. Retrieval and clinical studies of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings have associated increased wear. 1. and elevated patient ion levels. 2. with steep cup inclination angles and edge loading conditions. The University of Leeds have previously developed a hip simulator method that has been validated against retrievals and shown to replicate clinically relevant wear rates and wear mechanisms. 3,4. This method involves introducing lateral
INTRODUCTION. Ceramic-on-ceramic hip replacements have generated great interest in recent years due to substantial improvements in manufacturing techniques and material properties. 1.
High cup abduction angles generate increased contact stresses, higher wear rates and increased revision rates. However, there is no reported study about the influence of cup abduction on stresses under head lateralisation conditions for ceramic-on-Ceramic THA. A finite elements model of a ceramic-on-ceramic THA was developed in order to predict the contact area and the contact pressure, first under an ideal regime and then under lateralised conditions. A 32 mm head diameter with a 30 microns radial clearance was used. The cup was positioned with a 0°anteversion angle and the abduction angle was varied from 45° to 90°. The medial-lateral lateralisation was varied from 0 to 500 microns. A load of 2500 N was applied through the head center.Background
Material and method
Introduction and Aims. In order to improve the longevity and design of an implant, a wide range of pre-clinical testing conditions should be considered including variations in surgical delivery, and patients' anatomy and biomechanics. The aim of this research study was to determine the effect of the acetabular cup inclination angle with different levels of joint centre mismatch on the magnitude of dynamic
Introduction. Stripe wear, observed on retrieved ceramic hip replacements, has only been replicated in vitro under translational mal-positioning conditions where the centres of rotation of the head and the cup are mismatched. 1,2. ; an in vitro condition termed “microseparation”. The aim of this study was to compare the edge loading mechanisms observed under
Introduction. Increased wear rates [1, 2] and acetabular rim fracture [3] of hip replacement bearings reported clinically have been associated with edge loading, which could occur due to rotational and/or translational mal-positioning [4]. Surgical mal-positioning can lead to dynamic
Introduction. Ceramic composites have been developed to further improve the mechanical properties, reduce risk of fracture, and increase the survivorship of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip replacement. 1. . The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear of two novel ceramic composite materials under edge loading conditions due to translational mal-positioning when used in both like-on-like and mixed pairing configurations; and to compare their performance to earlier generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Materials and Methods. The head-on-cup configurations of three ceramic materials (see Figure 1), were ATZ-on-ATZ, ZTA-on-ZTA, Al. 2. O. 3. -on-Al. 2. O. 3. , ATZ-on-ZTA, ZTA-on-ATZ, Al. 2. O. 3. -on-ATZ, ATZ-on-Al. 2. O. 3. and Al. 2. O. 3. -on-ZTA. All combinations were size 28mm and were supplied by Mathys Orthopädie GmbH (Morsdorf, Germany). They were tested for four million cycles on the Leeds II hip simulator under
Malpositioning still occurs in total hip arthroplasty (THA). As a result of mal-orientation, THA bearing can be subjected to edge loading. The main objective of the study was to assess if the wear rate of ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene increases under edge loading conditions and to determine which of the most commonly used hip bearings is the most forgiving to implant mal-orientation. Materials and methods. Two different polyethylenes (UHMWPE and vitamin E blended HXLPE) and ceramics (pure aluminum PAL and alumina-toughened zirconia ATZ) were tested with a hip simulator and compared to metal-on-metal results. The inclination angle was selected at 45°, 65° and 80°. In addition, the ceramic-on-ceramic barings were tested at conditions that produced
Hip simulator studies have shown reduced hip offset can cause
Introduction. Cementless unicondylar knee implants are intended to offer surgeons the potential of a faster and less invasive surgery experience in comparison to cemented procedures. However, initial 8 week fixation with micromotion less than 150µm is crucial to their survivorship1 to avoid loosening2. Methods. Test methods by Davignon et al3 for micromotion were used to assess fixation of the MAKO UKR Tritanium (MAKO) (Stryker, NJ) and the Oxford Cementless UKR (Biomet, IN). Data was analyzed to determine the activities of daily living (ADL) that generate the highest forces and displacements4, 5. Stair ascent with 3.2BW compressive posterior tibial load was identified to be an ADL which may cause the most micromotion5. Based on previous studies6, 10,000 cycles was set as the run-time. The AP and IE profiles were scaled back to 60% for the Oxford samples to prevent the congruent insert from dislocating. A four-axis test machine (MTS, MN) was used. The largest size UKRs were prepared per manufacturer's surgical technique. Baseplates were inserted into Sawbones (Pacific Research, WA) blocks1. Femoral components were cemented to arbors. The medial compartment was tested, and the lateral implants were attached to balance the loads. Five tests were conducted for each implant with a new Sawbones and insert for each test per the test method3. The ARAMIS System (GOM, Germany) was used to measure relative motion between the baseplate and the Sawbones at three anteromedial locations (Fig. 1). Peak-Peak (P-P) micromotion was calculated in the compressive and A/P directions. FEA studies replicating the most extreme static loading positions for MAKO micromotion were conducted to compare with the physical test results using ANSYS14.5 (ANSYS, PA). Results. MAKO had a maximum axial motion of 36µm (SD=5.28) at gage 2. Oxford had an average gage 1 axial and A/P motion of 109µm (SD=31.77) and 44mm (SD=28.62) respectively (Fig. 2A). FEA correlated well with the MAKO results (Fig. 2B). Discussion. Oxford has been shown to have