Purpose/Background. More than 20 million UK citizens have MSK conditions, and post-pandemic the backlog awaiting access to MSK services has increased. The most prevalent MSK condition is low back pain (LBP), and getUBetter has been recommended by NICE as one of five digital health technologies for helping manage LBP. Purpose: Evaluate impact of getUBetter on a community MSK waiting list. Methods/Results. Mixed methods approach used. All patients on community MSK waiting list sent a postal invite for getUBetter. Number of downloads and frequency of use recorded, and users emailed questionnaire exploring outcomes and satisfaction. Rate users removed themselves from the waiting list compared with non-users. Of 14,500 invitations, 657(4.5%) patients downloaded getUBetter, 395(60.1%) used it once and 138(21%) ≥3 times. Seventeen (7%) of 239 patients canvassed responded to questionnaire, 17% reported improved pain, 21% reported improved confidence and had been helped back to work. Twenty-five percent better understood their condition and 43% needed no other treatment. Seventy-five percent were critical of limited content, with chronic osteoarthritis mentioned. 69.6% of users removed themselves from the waiting list. This was 29.6% above the rate for non-users. Conclusion. Sending postal invites for getUBetter to a MSK waiting list yielded limited uptake. However, despite some criticisms, patients using it reported improved pain, early return to usual activities, and improved confidence in self-management. Some patients recovered without the need for additional support and getUBetter shows some potential for reducing a MSK waiting list. Clearly further work is required to explore methods to increase patient uptake and maximise impact. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Purpose of the study. The aims of the study were to explore the experiences of sciatica sufferers, their perceptions of physiotherapy and healthcare service provision. Methods. This was the qualitative element of a mixed methods study investigating the feasibility of early physiotherapy for sciatica. Participants in the pilot trial consented to take part in semi-structured interviews before and after they had undertaken an individualised physiotherapy programme. Data from the interviews was examined line by line using a thematic analysis approach with key themes and sub-themes emerging. Results. Thirty-three participants were recruited and a total of 45 interviews being carried out. 7 central themes and 17 sub-themes were generated from thematic analysis. The first-line treatment administered to all participants by their G.P was a combination of analgesia. The drugs used included paracetamol, ibuprofen, nefopam, diclofenac, tramadol, morphine, diazepam and baclofen. Neuropathic pain modulating medication such as amitriptyline, gabapentin or pregabalin was widely used. Participants reported that medication simply didn't provide sufficient pain relief at a dose where side-effects were acceptable. Twenty-four interviewees described the negative side-effects of the drugs including nausea, dizziness, confusion, constipation, drowsiness, impotence and bloating. Furthermore, participants were concerned about their ability to carry out normal day to day tasks such as childcare, work and driving due to the side-effects of the drugs. Conclusion. Sciatica can be all encompassing, with severe pain and disability. A range of medication is commonly used for pain relief. The results from this study suggest that the drugs don't provide significant pain relief without deleterious side-effects in some patients. No conflicts of interest for any authors. Sources of funding: MR is the recipient of a HEE/NIHR Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship which funded the study

A statement of the purposes of the study and background. The biopsychosocial (BPS) model is recommended for managing non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) but the best method for teaching the BPS model is unclear. E-learning is a promising alternative to face-to-face methods. This study was a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded interview study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a main RCT and to explore the impact of an BPS for NSLBP e-learning programme on experienced practitioners' attitudes to back pain. A summary of the methods used and the results. Mixed methods evaluated the impact of an evidence-based e-learning programme on participants' attitudes to back pain. A pilot RCT assessed 45 experienced osteopaths' attitudes before and after the intervention, using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) and the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale (ABS). The qualitative study explored 9 participants' views on the e-learning programme and possible impact on their clinical practice. 91% of participants completed the course and the overall satisfaction was very high. Participants' views on the BPS model ranged between not being structural enough, already done and transformative. The e-learning programme was well accepted. It would be feasible to run a main study using the same recruitment procedures, eligibility criteria, randomisation procedure, consent process, data collection and outcome measures. Conclusion. E-learning is an appropriate tool to deliver CPD to experienced manual therapists. Although a pilot study, the results suggest a shift in practitioners' attitudes towards a more BPS view of back pain. A main trial should be undertaken to test the effectiveness of the intervention. No conflicts of interest. Funding acknowledgements: This research is part of Jerry Draper-Rodi's Professional Doctorate in Osteopathy, partly funded by the British School of Osteopathy

Purpose. Health literacy, the ability to seek, understand and utilise health information, is important for health and health-related decisions. Suboptimal health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes in many chronic conditions although this has not been studied in chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study explored health literacy in a community cohort with and without CLBP. Methods and results. 117 adults, comprising 61 with no history of CLBP and 56 with CLBP (28 with low and high disability, respectively, determined by a median split in Oswestry scores) participated. Using a mixed methods approach, data were collected on pain severity, LBP-related disability, fear avoidance, LBP beliefs, pain catastrophizing and health literacy was measured using the Short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). In-depth interviews were undertaken with 36 CLBP participants to explore beliefs about LBP and experiences in seeking, understanding and using LBP information. LBP-related beliefs and behaviours, rather than pain intensity and health literacy skills, were associated with disability related to LBP. Individuals with CLBP-high disability had poorer back pain beliefs and increased fear avoidance behaviours relating to physical activity. Although S-TOFHLA scores suggested adequate health literacy across all participants and these were not related to LBP beliefs and attitudes, interviews revealed that individuals with CLBP-high disability adopted a more passive coping style and had a patho-anatomical view of their disorder compared to individuals with CLBP-low disability. Conclusion. While participants with CLBP have adequate S-TOFHLA scores, qualitative data revealed barriers in seeking, understanding and utilising LBP information