Introduction. Metal-on-Metal (MoM) bearing surfaces were historically used for young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, and remain commonplace in modern hip resurfacing. In theory, it has been postulated that metal ions released from such implants may cross the placental barrier and cause harm to the fetus. In light of this potential risk, recommendations against the use of
An increase in metal ion levels is seen after implantation of all
The relevance of fluid-film lubrication, elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and ‘tribolayers’ for hip bearings has been the subject of much debate (Fisher 2012). However, knowledge of the thickness and distribution of proteins in and around the wear zone of metal-on-polyethylene (MPE) bearings is scant. The efficacy of protein lubrication with metal-on-metal bearings (MOM) is in discovery. This simulator study was designed to analyze film formation on
Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty has fallen out of favor because of complications arising from the articulation, namely metal sensitivity and accelerated wear. These complications can lead to early/mid-term failures from pain, osteolysis, implant loosening, and pseudotumor formation. However, it has become clearer that MOM total hip arthroplasty behaves differently from
Introduction. Metal on metal hip resurfacing (MoM HR) is attractive for young active patients. Patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) are relatively young. HR can be an option of treatment, however, long-term stability of the femoral component is a concern because of the necrotic lesion in the femoral head. There is also a concern of ARMD for
This study of retrieved 28 mm Metasul™ (cemented) revealed for the first time adverse wear effects created by impingement-subluxation in
Introduction. One unpredictable clinical risk with THA may be impingement of a metal cup rim against a metal femoral-neck, with concomitant release of metal particles. Our objective was to determine if metal debris could be one trigger for catastrophic
Purpose. There are some concerns about doing hip resurfacing arthroplasty in ONFH due to bone defect which can cause mechanical weakness of femoral component and highly active young age of patients which can cause high wear rate and failure rate. The purpose of this study is to verify the HRA is safe procedure in ONFH in the aspect of mechanical and biological issue. Materials and Methods. Between December 1998 and May 2005, 185 hips of 169 patients underwent
Introduction. The failure rate of Total Hip Replacement (THR) has been shown to be strongly influenced by the nature of the articulating interfaces, with Metal-on-Metal (MoM) articulations having three times the failure rate of Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP) components. It has been postulated that this observation is related to edge wear and increased bearing torque of large
Introduction. Historical studies have reported incidences of taper corrosion in retrieved MoP hips of 20–50%. These studies relied on visual assessments, rather than using modern analytical techniques. Patients/Materials and Methods. The Northern Retrieval Registry was initiated to routinely analyse all retrieved hips. The volumetric wear rates of retrieved Exeter head tapers were measured using a coordinate measuring machine using validated methods and compared to the available results obtained from an ongoing study of failed
Management of pseudotumours associated with
In an effort to understand the role of metal ion analysis and how it relates to revision surgery and implant wear, four revised
Introduction. Hip simulators proved to be valuable, pre-clinical tests for assessing wear. Preferred implant positioning has been with cup mounted above head, i.e. ‘Anatomical’ (Figs. 1a-c) . 1,2. while the ‘Inverted’ test (cup below head) was typically preferred in debris studies (Figs. 1d-f). 3,4. In an Anatomical study, wear patterns on cups and heads averaged 442 and 1668 mm² area, respectively, representing 8% and 30% of available hemi-surface (Table 1), i.e. the head pattern was ×3.8 times larger than cup. This concept of wear patterns is illustrated well in the ‘pin-on-disk’ test (Fig. 1) in which the oscillating pin has the ‘contained’ wear area (CWP) and the large wear track on the disk is the ‘distributed’ pattern (DWP). Hip simulators also create CWP and DWP patterns, site dependant on whether Anatomical (Fig. 1a-c) or ‘Inverted’ (Fig. 1d-f) test. However there is scant foundation as to clinical merits of either test mode. Retrieval studies of
No, not my mother, but metal-on-metal (MoM) hips! My involvement in the DEFENSE side of
The
We conducted a retrospective study to assess
the prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) in patients
operated on at our institution with metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip
replacements with 36 mm heads using a Pinnacle acetabular shell.
A total of 326 patients (150 males, 175 hips; 176 females, 203 hips)
with a mean age of 62.7 years (28 to 85) and mean follow-up of 7.5
years (0.1 to 10.8) participating in our in-depth modern
The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship for a
Metal-on-metal retrieval studies indicated that
A 35-year-old female (age 35Yrs) had primary MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 2008. At 8 months this patient postoperatively developed headaches, memory loss, vertigo, and aura-like symptoms that progressed to seizures. At 18 months review, she complained of progressive hip pain, a popping sensation and crepitus with joint motion. This patient weighed 284lbs with BMI of 38.5. Radiographs revealed the cup had 55° inclination, 39° anteversion (Fig. 1). Metal ion concentrations were high (blood: Co=126 mcg/L, Cr= 64mcg/L). Revision was performed in November 2010 A dark, serous fluid was observed, along with synovitis. The implants were well fixed and the femoral head could not be removed; thus the stem was removed by femoral osteotomy. With the head fused on this femoral stem, for the 1. st. time it was possible to precisely determine the habitual patterns of
INTRODUCTION. The uncertainty of the biological effects of wear and corrosion from Metal-on-metal (MoM) implants has initiated a debate on their safety and use. Generally, the release of wear particles from