UKA with mobile bearing is a one of the treatment of medial osteoarthritis. However, some reports refer to the risk of dislocation of the mobile bearing. Past reports pointed out that medial gap might be enlarged in deep flexion position (over 120 degrees), and says that it will lead to instability of the mobile bearing. The purpose of this study is to research the risk factors of enlargement of medial gap in deep flexion position. We performed 81 UKAs with mobile bearing system from November 2013 to December 2015, and could evaluate 41 knees. This study of 41 knees included 9 males and 32 females, with average operation age of 75.4years(63–89years). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 39 knees and osteonecrosis in 2 knees. The UKA(Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used in all cases. We performed distal femur and proximal tibia osteotomy using CT-Free navigation system(Stryker Navigation System II/precision Knee Navigation ver4.0). And we inserted femoral and tibial trial component, then we placed an UKA tensioner on the medial component of the knee. Using tensioner under 30 lbs, we measured joint medial gap at 0,20,45,90,130(deep flexion) degrees. When we compared medial gap at 90 degrees position with at 130 degrees, we defined it as ‘instability group’ if there was gap enlargement more than 1mm, and defined it as ‘stability group’ if there wasn't. We compared this two groups with regard to age, BMI, femoro-tibial angle (FTA), the diameter of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle of the implant. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative FTA by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. We measured ACL diameter at its condyle level in coronal view of MRI. Also we evaluated tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT using 3D template system. These measurement were analyzed statistically using t test. The stability group contained 26 knees, and the instability group contained 15 knees. Compared with the stability group, the instability group indicated higher FTA (p=0.001). Between 20 and 90 degrees flexion position, there was no change of medial gap. Dislocation of the mobile bearing is one of the complications of UKA and it will need re-operation. It is said to be caused by impingement of the bearing and osteophyte of femur. However, some reports said that dislocation was happened when the knee was flexed deeply or twisted, and there was no impingement. We think it may means that dislocation could be caused by medial gap enlargement. This study indicates that higher FTA could be risk factor of dislocation of mobile bearing. It is important to evaluate preoperatively FTA by X-ray

Introduction. The results of the original mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing because of high dislocation rates (11%). This original implant used a flat bearing articulation on the tibial tray. To address the issue of dislocation a new implant (domed tibia with biconcave bearing to increase entrapment) was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral UKR. Methods. Separate geometric computer models of an Oxford mobile bearing lateral UKR were generated for the two types of articulation between the tibial component and the meniscal bearing: Flat-on-flat (flat) and Concave-on-convex (domed). Each type of mobile bearing was used to investigate three distinct dislocation modes observed clinically: lateral to medial dislocation, with the bearing resting on the tray wall (L-M-Wall); medial to lateral dislocation, out of the joint space (M-L); anterior to posterior dislocation, out of the joint space (A-P). A size C tray and a medium femoral component and bearing were used in all models. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were first aligned in a neutral position. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom. The femoral component was restrained from moving in the anterior-posterior directions and in the medial-lateral directions. The femoral component was also restrained from rotating about the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral and superior-inferior directions. This meant that the femoral component was only able to move in the superior-inferior direction. Different bearing sizes were inserted into the model and the effect that moving the femoral component medially and laterally had on the amount of distraction required to cause bearing dislocation was investigated. Results. The average femur distraction to allow bearing dislocation in the A-P, M-L and L-M-wall directions was 1.62 mm (27%), 0.51 mm (26%) and 1.2 mm (24%) greater respectively for the domed bearing. There was a 3% increase in femoral distraction required to cause L-M-Wall dislocation, per increment of bearing thickness for both the domed and lateral bearings. There was on average a 7% increase in femoral distraction required to cause L-M-Wall dislocation per mm increment of medial femoral component movement. Discussion. Dislocation over the tray wall is a particular clinical problem and using a domed bearing can lead to an increased required femoral distraction of between 25% and 37%. This may be significant during everyday activities and demonstrates that the new domed design should reduce the incidence of bearing dislocation by increasing the amount of entrapment. Increasing the thickness of the bearing has a small effect on the distraction required to allow bearing dislocation. Lateral placement of the femoral component markedly reduced the femoral distraction required for bearing dislocation over the tray wall. Medial placement of the femoral component is advisable so long as impingement with the tray wall is avoided

Abstract. Background. The Oxford Domed Lateral (ODL) Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has some advantages over other lateral UKRs, but the mobile bearing dislocation rate is high (1–6%). Medial dislocations, with the bearing lodged on the tibial component wall, are most common. Anterior/posterior dislocations are rare. For a dislocation to occur distraction of the joint is required. We have developed and validated a dislocation analysis tool based on a computer model of the ODL with a robotics path-planning algorithm to determine the Vertical Distraction required for a Dislocation (VDD), which is inversely related to the risk of dislocation. Objectives. To modify the ODL design so the risk of medial dislocation decreases to that of an anterior/posterior dislocation. Methods. The components were modified using Solidworks. For each modification the dislocation analysis tool was used to determine the VDD for medial dislocation (with bearing 0–6mm from the tibial wall). This was compared with the original implant to identify the modifications that were most effective at reducing the dislocation risk. These modifications were combined into a final design, which was assessed. Results. Modifying the tibial component plateau, changing the femoral component width and making the bearing wider medially had little effect on VDD. Shifting the femoral sphere centre medially decreased VDD. Shifting the femoral sphere laterally, increasing tibial wall height and increasing bearing width laterally increased VDD. A modified implant with a femoral sphere centre 3mm lateral, wall 2.8mm higher, and bearing 2mm wider laterally, implanted so the bearing is ≤4mm from the tibial wall with a bearing thickness ≥4mm had a minimum VDD for medial dislocation of 5.75mm, which is larger than the minimum VDD for anterior/posterior dislocation of 5.5mm. Conclusions. A modified ODL design should decrease the dislocation rate to an acceptable level, however, further testing in cadavers is required. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Introduction. Despite decades of clinical research in artificial joints and underlying failure mechanisms, systematical and reproducible identification of reasons for complications in total knee replacements (TKR) remains difficult. Due to the complex dynamic interaction of implant system and biological situs, malfunction eventually leading to failure is multifactorial and remains not fully understood. The aim of present study was to evaluate different TKR designs and positions with regard to joint kinematics and stability under dynamic conditions by using a robot-based hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) setup. Material & methods. An industrial 6-axis robot with 6-axis force-torque sensor mounted into its end-effector moved and loaded real, commercially available TKR (bicondylar, cruciate-retaining) that were in virtual interaction with a subject-specific computational multibody model representing the anatomical situs of the knee joint while performing passive seated deep knee flexion. The subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody model (MMB) included rigid bones of the lower right extremity. Bone and cartilage geometries were reconstructed from MRT/ CT data sets preserving anatomical landmarks and allowing for the calculation of inertial properties. M. quadriceps femoris was modeled as single passive tensile force elements. Knee ligaments were modelled as elastic spring elements with a nonlinear force-displacement characteristic. Providing the flexion angle, the robot moved and loaded the mounted femoral implant component with respect to the tibial component while being in continuous interaction with the MMB. Several influencing parameters like implant position (internal/external rotation, varus/valgus alignment) and design (fixed vs. mobile bearing, tibia-insert height) as well as ligament insufficiency and joint loading on joint kinematics and stability was systematically analysed. Results. Improper implant positioning caused joint instability, which was demonstrated in higher magnitudes of the relative kinematics. Negative effects by incorrect implant positioning could be partially compensated by a mobile bearing design. However, this was accompanied with an increase in tibiofemoral contact forces. High correlation of tibia-insert height on ligament and contact force was found. After releasing ligament structures, lower tibiofemoral contact forces and joint opening during deep knee flexion were observed. Conclusion. By means of HiL simulation different clinical and technical parameters of TKR were evaluated in a systematical and reproducible fashion under physiological-like boundary conditions with regard to joint kinematics and stability. The proposed HiL test setup combining robot-based testing with MMBs can contribute to deeper understanding of knee joint function and improvement of total knee implant systems. Acknowledgement. The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant numbers: WO WO 452/8-1, BA 3347/3-1 and KL 2327/4-1) for supporting the project

Background. The goal of this study was (1) to investigate the relationships between the bony contours of the knee and the popliteus tendon before and after TKA and (2) to analyse the influence of implant sizing. Our hypothesis was that an apparently well-sized prosthesis, will modify the position or the tracking of popliteus tendon. Methods. 4 fresh frozen cadavers were selected. The popliteus tendon was injected with contrast dye and a CT-scan was performed from full extension to full flexion with increments of 20°. Afterwards a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed. Each cadaver received either a normal-sized, oversized, undersized or mobile bearing prosthesis. After TKA the limb was scanned again using the same protocol as before. 3D-reconstructions were created using Materialise Mimics software. These 3D-models were then imported into custom made Matlab software to measure and compare the deviation of the popliteus tendon before and after TKA. Results. TKA resulted in significant postero-lateral displacement of the tendon from full extension to 100° flexion in both normal- and oversized prosthesis. In normal-sized prosthesis in full extension the mean posterior deviation was 6.2 mm (SD: 1.2). For oversized prosthesis the mean posterior deviation was 16.7mm (SD: 0.6). For the undersized prosthesis mean posterior deviation was −0.8mm (SD: 0.3). Finally for the mobile bearing prosthesis mean posterior deviation was −3.1mm (SD: 1.3). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation which analyses the relationships between implants and soft tissues after TKA. The main finding is that surgeons must approach sizing in terms of volume rather than in terms of surface. The current study seems to indicate that it may be advantageous to aim at undersizing implants, both in the mediolateral dimension and in the anteroposterior dimension. Level of Evidence. 4

Summary Statement. A large proportion of knee arthroplasty patients are dissatisfied with their replacement. Significant differences exist between preoperative, postoperative and normal kinematics. A better understanding of the inter-relationships between kinematics, shape and prosthesis placement could lead to improved quality of life. Introduction. Knee kinematics are altered by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) both intentionally and unintentionally. Knowledge of how and why kinematics change may improve patient outcome and satisfaction through improved implant design, implant placement or rehabilitation. Comparing preoperative to postoperative kinematics and shape of the natural and replaced joint will allow an investigation of the inter-relationships between knee shape, prosthesis placement, knee kinematics and quality of life. Patients & Methods. Using a sequential-biplanar radiographic protocol that allowed imaging the preoperative and postoperative patellofemoral (PF) and tibiofemoral (TF) joints under weightbearing throughout the range of motion, we imaged and compared the 6 degree-of-freedom PF and TF kinematics of 9 pre-TKA subjects to those of 15 post-TKA subjects (Zimmer NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilised Gender Solutions (GS) components). Using a novel computed tomography (CT) protocol, we obtained the femoral, tibial and patellar knee shapes, plus component placement after TKA. The same 9 pre-TKA subjects have now been re-imaged a minimum of one year postoperatively (DePuy Sigma Mobile Bearing cruciate-sacrificing components) to determine their changes in knee geometry and kinematics; full analysis is in progress. Results. Clear, statistically significant differences were seen between the kinematics of the pre-TKA and post-TKA groups. For the TF joint, the tibia was more posterior and inferior in the post-TKA group compared to the pre-TKA group (max 20 mm and 15 mm, respectively) (p<0.001). Subjects had neutral alignment in the post-TKA group compared to varus alignment (max 9°) in the pre-TKA group (p<0.001). For the PF joint, the patella was shifted more posteriorly and less laterally postoperatively and was tilted neutrally compared to laterally (p<0.001). Our preliminary analysis of the matched preop-postop subjects likewise shows a more posterior and inferior tibia and neutral versus valgus alignment. Greater tibial rotations were seen postoperatively due to the mobile bearing. The patella was more posterior and less lateral postoperatively, as seen with the two groups. Discussion/Conclusion. The kinematic differences seen are likely due to a combination of surgical, implant and patient factors. Both groups showed differences from normal kinematics, based on previous studies in the literature. In the future, by comparing the preoperative and postoperative kinematics, shape and quality of life for the same subjects (i.e. the 9 pre-TKA subjects in this study), and analyzing the interrelationships amongst these, we aim to determine if a different implant shape or different component positioning could create more normal kinematics, resulting in a better clinical outcome

The CCI mobile bearing ankle implant used at our orthopedic department 2010–2013, was abandoned due to failures and findings of bone loss at revision. The aim of this study was to a) Determine our true revision rate, b) Investigate accuracy of measuring prevalence, size and location of periprosthetic bone cysts through X-ray and CT and c) Relate these findings to implant alignment and patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs). 51 primary surgeries were performed, prior to this study 8 had been revised. Out of 43 un-revised patients, 36 were enrolled and underwent evaluation with metal artefact reduction CT-scans and conventional X-ray. They filled out 3 PROMs; SEFAS, SF-12, EQ-5D. Cyst volume larger than 0.1 ml was measured using VITREA volume tools for CT-scans and calculation of spherical volume for X-rays; using AP- and lateral projections. Location of lesions was recorded, according to their position relative to the implant. Medial-/lateral- and anterior-/posterior tilt of the implant parts was measured using IMPAX built in measuring tools, applied to AP- and lateral X-ray projection. The relation between lesions location and alignment of components was analyzed by logistic regression. Bias and ICC estimation between CT and X-ray was analyzed by mixed effect model. Log transformation was used to fit the normal distribution assumption. PROMs association to osteolytic volume was analyzed by linear- and logistic regression. P-values of 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Finding large osteolytic lesions caused 4 additional patients to undergo revision and 7 are being monitored due to high risk of failure. Of the original 51 implants 14 have been revised. 8 cases because of osteolytic lesions and aseptic loosening (true revisions w. exchange of components or bone transplants), 3 periprosthetic fractures (2 non-traumatic fractures) and 3 cases of exostosis. The 3- and 5 year revision rate was 14% and 16% for true revisions and 17% and 27% overall. Cystic lesions were found in 81% of participants. Total cyst-volume was on average 13% larger on X-ray, however this difference was not significant (p = 0.55), with intraclass correlation being 0.66. Total cystic volume was not significantly related to PROM-scores (P 0.16–0.5). Location of cysts showed association with alignment of components (P 0.02–0.08). Mean tibia component anterior tilt was 89 degrees (SD 4). Mean medial tilt was 91 degrees (SD 3) for the tibial and 90 degrees (SD 4) for the talar component. The implant investigated performs below standard, compared to public registries. 1, 2. that report overall 5 year revision rates at 5 – 6.5%. We obtained larger measurements from X-rays than CT, unlike previous studies comparing these modalities. Cysts were common and large. Correlation between lesion location and alignment of implant, with valgus and anterior tilt of components causing more lesions in adjacent zones, may suggest a link between implant failure and alignment of components

Objectives

This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group.

When performing the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR), the positioning of the talar component and the selection of mobile-bearing thickness are critical. A biomechanical experiment was undertaken to establish the effects of these variables on the range of movement (ROM) of the ankle.

Six cadaver ankles containing a specially-modified STAR prosthesis were subjected to ROM determination, under weight-bearing conditions, while monitoring the strain in the peri-ankle ligaments. Each specimen was tested with the talar component positions in neutral, as well as 3 and 6 mm of anterior and posterior displacement. The sequence was repeated with an anatomical bearing thickness, as well as at 2 mm reduced and increased thicknesses. The movement limits were defined as 10% strain in any ligament, bearing lift-off from the talar component or limitations of the hardware.

Both anterior talar component displacement and bearing thickness reduction caused a decrease in plantar flexion, which was associated with bearing lift-off. With increased bearing thickness, posterior displacement of the talar component decreased plantar flexion, whereas anterior displacement decreased dorsiflexion.