The posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis is designed specifically to provide the posterior stability to a knee arthroplasty when PCL is deficient or has to be sacrificed. Posterior dislocation of such prosthesis is rare but dreaded complication. There are several causes of postoperative dislocation such as malposition of the prosthesis, preoperative valgus deformity, a defect of the extensor mechanism and overwidening of the flexion gap. Posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing knee implants have been widely used to further improve the postoperative range of motion by incorporation of the post and cam mechanism to improve the posterior roll back during flexion and to overcome the wear and osteolysis problems due to significant undersurface micromotion of posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing knees. But, spin-out or rotatory dislocation of the polyethylene insert can occurs as result of excessive rotation of the rotating platform accompanied by translation of the femur on the tibia after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty, but that is very rare. Here, authors describe an unusual case of acute 180° rotatory dislocation of the rotating platform after posterior dislocation of a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. A 71-year-old male with knee osteoarthritis underwent a TKRA using posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis. The posterior dislocation of the total knee arthroplasty occurred 5 weeks postoperatively(Fig. 1). We underwent closed reduction of posterior dislocated total knee arthroplasty resulting in a complete 180° rotatory dislocation of the rotating platform (Fig. 2). He was treated with open exploration and polyethylene exchange with a larger component. This case illustrates that dislocation of a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty can occur with valgus laxity, cause 90° spin-out of the polyethylene insert and closed reduction attempts may contribute to complete 180° rotatory dislocation of the rotating platform. Special attention needs to be paid to both AP and lateral view to ensure that the platform is truly reduced and not just rotated 180° as was in this case

Background. Currently there are various knee prosthesis designs available each with its plus and minus points; there is no general consensus on whether mobile-bearing knees are functionally better than fixed-bearing ones. This study is designed to compare outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with both of the above prostheses. Materials & Methods. 50 patients (68 knees) who'd had a total knee arthroplasty between April 1999 and April 2008 at both Akhtar and Kian Hospitals for primary osteoarthritis were selected. In 30 cases a fixed-bearing knee (Scorpio(r), Stryker) and in the remaining 38 a mobile-bearing prosthesis (Rotaglide(r), Corin Group) was used. Patients' knees were scored before and after the operation according to the Knee Society Scoring System. The mobile-bearing group had an average age of 65 and 34 months' follow-up; in the fixed-bearing group the average age was 69 and the average follow-up 30 months. Results. The average knee score in the mobile-bearing group rose from 29 to 64 while in the fixed-bearing group the score changed from 31 to 68. The average functional score moved from 45 to 67 in the mobile-bearing group and from 34 to 57 in the fixed-bearing group. The average overall score, for the fixed-bearing group, moved from 65 to 125 and in the mobile-bearing group from 75 to 128. Conclusion. In both groups the average knee/functional knee scores increased after the operation and all patients were happy with the results, however statistically there was no meaningful relationship between pre-and post-operation scores. So regarding to our findings, there is no preference between these two types of prosthesis

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty, the alignment of leg depends on the alignment of the component. In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, it is determined by the thickness of the implant relative to the bone excised mostly. After initial scepticism, UKA is increasingly accepted as a reliable procedure for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with the improvements in implant design, surgical technique and appropriate patient selection. Recently, computer assisted UKA is helpful in accuracy and less invasive procedure. But, fixed bearing or mobile bearing in UKA is still controversy. We compared the early clinical and radiological results of robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a fixed bearing design versus a mobile type bearing design. Materials and Methods. A data set of 50 cases of isolated compartmental degenerative disease that underwent robot-assisted UKA using a fixed bearing design were compared to a data set of 50 cases using a mobile bearing type design. The operations were performed by one-senior author with the same robot system. The clinical evaluations included the Knee Society Score (knee score, functional score) and postoperative complications. The radiological evaluations was assessed by 3-foot standing radiographs using the technique of Kennedy and White to determine the mechanical axis and femoro-tibial angle for knee alignment. Operative factors were evaluated including length of skin incision, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and intraoperative complications. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, skin incision size, blood loss and hospital stay. (p > 0.05) There were no significant differences in Knee Society Scores at last follow up. An average preoperative femorotibial alignment was varus alignment of −1° in both groups. Postoperative patients with fixed-bearing implants had an average +2.1° valgus and the patients with mobile bearing implants had +5.4° valgus in femorotibial alignment, which was different.(p<0.05) There was one case of medial tibia plateau fracture in fixed bearing group in 3 months postoperatively. And there were one case of liner dislocation with unstable knee in 6 weeks postoperatively and one case of femoral component loosening in 1 year postoperatively in mobile bearing group. There was no intraoperative complication. The average preoperative knee score was 45.8, which improved to 89.5 in fixed bearing group and 46.5, which improved to 91.2 in mobile bearing group at last followup. The average preoperative function score was 62.4 which improved to 86.5 in fixed bearing group and 60.7 which improved to 88.2 in mobile bearing group at last followup. Conclusion. In ourearly experience, two types of bearing of robot-assisted UKA groups showed no statistical differences in clinical assessment but there was statistical difference in postoperative radiological corrected alignment. But in aspect of early complications, we think that mobile bearing seems to be requiring more attention in surgery

There is ample data to confirm that Computer-assisted total knee replacement improves alignment of the limb when compared with the conventional technique. There is also published evidence that optimum alignment correlates with longevity of implants. CAS enables accurate component alignment of both femoral and tibial components. It enables accurate restoration of the posterior tibial slope which has important consequences for flexion range and stability of the component in flexion especially if mobile bearing implants are considered. CAS also aids in correctly orienting rotation of the femoral component; this has value in minimizing patellar maltracking. We will present our data showing accurate restoration of joint line and posterior femoral offset. As CAS ensures alignment, rotation, sizing and positioning of components, the surgeon is free to devote his efforts to ensuring soft-tissue balance and stability, since TKA is really a ‘soft-tissue’ operation. How CAS is of immense value in deformity correction and soft-tissue balancing will be illustrated with examples. It helps in better understanding and quantification of the effects of soft-tissue release on flexion-extension gaps and this is of great value not only for minimal deformities (to minimise releases) but also for severe deformities (to ensure complete correction by adequate release). CAS is invaluable in helping equalize flexion-extension gaps; how it can help balance the flexion gap to the extension gap by ‘virtual surgery’ will be depicted with examples. It is particularly useful in presence of hardware in the femur or tibia and for concomitant extra-articular deformity. We have also found a consistent improvement in recovery of functional milestones with CAS with similar results for both unilateral and bilateral TKAs. Furthermore, there is evidence to support that ensuring alignment has important benefits in improving functional and quality of life scores. In addition, those with alignment of mechanical axis within 3 degrees of normal have been shown to have a shorter stay in hospital by 2 days. Studies have shown reduced blood loss and incidence of emboli after CAS TKA. Using CAS routinely for all cases, the author is ‘time neutral’. While there is always room for improvement with evolving technologies and CAS is no exception, it already has enormous benefits in the performance and outcome of TKA, and is an important part of the surgical armamentarium for a successful knee arthroplasty

Purpose. Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) is increasingly being offered to patients as an alternative to arthrodesis for the operative management of debilitating end-stage ankle arthritis. The Mobility Total Ankle System is a third-generation design consisting of a three component, cementless, unconstrained, mobile-bearing prosthesis. This study reports the early results of a multi-centre prospective study of the Mobility prosthesis. This is the first such report by independent researchers. Method. The senior authors implanted 86 consecutive Mobility prostheses. The underlying diagnosis was primary OA in 24 ankles, secondary OA in 47 ankles and inflammatory arthritis in 15 ankles. There were 41 males (Mean age 67 / Range 51–87) and 44 females (Mean age 60 / Range 29–72). The mean BMI was 28 (Range 22–36) for males, and 28 (Range 20–39) for females. Previous ankle operations were performed in 24 patients, 22 of which were for fracture fixation. Ankles were classified according to the COFAS end-stage ankle arthritis classification system. Coronal plane deformity was quantified pre-operatively. Clinical outcome was assessed using the AOFAS hindfoot score. Radiological assessment was performed from weight-bearing radiographs, documenting post-operative alignment, osseous integration, edge-loading and heterotopic bone formation. The mean follow-up time was 40 months (Range 30–60). Survival analysis was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Failure was defined as exchange of any component of the TAR, arthrodesis or amputation. Results. Type 1 ankle arthritis was demonstrated in 54 ankles (63%). No patient had pre-operative coronal plane angulation > 20. In 30 ankles (35%), the pre-operative coronal alignment was neutral, and in 32 ankles (37%), the deformity was < 10. The mean AOFAS hindfoot score improved from 37.4 (Range 12–59) pre-operatively to 77.9 (Range 51–100) post-operatively. 78 (90%) of prosthetic components were implanted within 5 of the optimal position. Bone-implant interface abnormalities were identified in 16 ankles (18%). In total, 5 TARs required revision, 4 for aseptic loosening and one for component malpositioning. There was one conversion to arthrodesis, and one BKA for CRPS. 30 simultaneous procedures were performed in 28 patients. The most common was gastrocnemius recession. There were 8 re-operations, most commonly for impingement due to peri-articular ossifications. Delayed wound healing occurred in 3 patients, and there was one case of deep infection. There were 5 patients that sustained fractures of the medial malleolus: 2 were intra-operative, and underwent internal fixation. There are 6 patients being investigated for ongoing pain. The 2-year survival was 96.4% (95% CI 89.4–99.1) and 3-year survival was 91.7% (95% CI 83.3–96.3). Conclusion. Although early results of the Mobility TAR are encouraging for independent researchers, they do not match those reported by designer surgeons. Most patients achieve good pain relief and improved function post-operatively