Aims. The importance of accurate identification and reporting of surgical site infection (SSI) is well recognised but poorly defined. Public Health England (PHE) mandated collection of orthopaedic SSI data in 2004. Data submission is required in one of four categories (hip prosthesis, knee prosthesis, repair of neck of femur, reduction of long bone fracture) for one quarter per year. Trusts are encouraged to carry out post-discharge surveillance but this is not mandatory. Recent papers in the orthopaedic literature have highlighted the importance of SSI surveillance and the heterogeneity of surveillance methods. However, details of current orthopaedic SSI surveillance practice has not been described or quantified. Patients and Methods. All 147 NHS trusts in England were audited using a structured questionnaire. Data was collected in the following categories: data collection; data submission to PHE; definitions used; resource constraints; post-discharge surveillance and SSI rates in the four PHE categories. The response rate was 87.7%. Results. Variation in practice was clear in all categories in terms of methods and timings of data collection and data submission. There was little agreement on SSI definitions. At least six different definitions were used, some trusts using more than one definition. Post-discharge surveillance was carried out by 62% of respondents but there was again variation in both the methods and staff used. More than half of the respondents felt that SSI surveillance in their unit was limited by resource constraints. SSI rates ranged from 0% to 10%. Conclusion. This paper quantifies the heterogeneity of SSI surveillance in England. It highlights the importance of adequate resourcing and the unreliability of relying on voluntary data collection and submission. Conformity of definitions and methods are recommended to enable meaningful SSI data to be collated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:171–4

Clinical commissioning groups (CCG) have been replaced with ICBs that will bring together NHS and social care for the local population. ICBs are allocating contracts for long waiters for total hip replacements (THR) to hospitals that have achieved pre-covid volumes of THR, THR volumes undertaken by hospitals in 2022 should be at 2019 levels or more. Purpose of this study was to identify whether NHS hospitals in England are at a disadvantage in procuring ICB contracts for THR. THR volumes for NHS and independent sector (IND) hospitals from January 2012 to November 2022 were identified via National Joint Registry. Regional and national trend for THR volumes were identified for both NHS and IND hospitals using linear regression analysis. Trends of THR for NHS hospitals showed either stagnation or reduction in volume from 2014–2019. In 2022, nationally THR volume of NHS was 70% of 2019 (Figure 1). Trend of THR volume for IND hospitals nationally was a strong uptrend from 2012 to 2022 with a break only in 2020 due to COVID pandemic (Figure 2). Since the pandemic IND have overtaken NHS hospitals in volumes of THR undertaken. Similar picture of trends evolves when THR trends were assessed on a region by region basis. With NHS hospitals not back to pre-pandemic THR volumes, IND hospitals have a distinct advantage in securing more contracts via ICB. This in turn puts NHS hospitals at risk of taking on more complex and medically unwell patients potentially worsening NJR outcomes for NHS hospitals. The reasons for the lag in NHS hospitals’ THR volumes are multifactorial, not limited to continued bed pressures, increased emergency and unplanned admissions, staff shortages and sickness, pension taxations preventing doctors from undertaking more THR. However, lack of access to contracts from ICB will put NHS hospitals at huge financial and existential risk for elective care. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Abstract. Introduction. Total knee replacement (TKR) aims to reduce pain and functional limitations. Despite a good outcome for many, 15–20% patients report chronic pain three months after TKR. The STAR Care Pathway is a clinically important and cost effective treatment to improve pain outcomes over 1 year for people with chronic pain at 3 months after total knee replacement surgery. The care pathway is delivered by specially trained Extended Scope Practitioners (ESPs). There is a gap between research findings and translation into practice. This work shows how the STAR trial findings were implemented into NHS practice at a single centre and the further work required to enable national implementation. Methodology. Trial findings were presented to NHS managers with a business case for an implementation pilot. Trial documentation was adapted for use in usual care using the COM-B model for behaviour change and evidence-based approaches to increase the return of postal questionnaires. Trial sites were contacted to understand their capacity to implement the intervention locally. Results. The STAR care pathway was successfully implemented into NHS practice with a screening response rate of 83%. It is now permanently part of usual care at North Bristol NHS Trust. Trial centres indicated that lack of availability of STAR trained ESPs as a barrier to implementation. The trial manual and training session were adapted for online delivery in partnership with Health Education England. Conclusion. The STAR care pathway has been successfully embedded into NHS care. A toolkit and online clinician training package enables national implementation

Purpose and background. Low back pain (LBP), a leading cause of chronic disability, is associated with high and disproportionate socioeconomic costs. Clinical assessment and triage via the NHS 111 service aims to reduce pressure on the urgent and emergency care system. Studies show that many attend the emergency department (ED) against advice, when they could be better managed elsewhere. The aim of this research was to explore how patients with LBP perceive and interact with NHS 111, and how this may have influenced their decision to attend ED. Methods and Results. This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, qualitative dataset of 47 patients (26M:21F, aged 23–79 years) purposively sampled with LBP, who attended 1 of 4 EDs in the UK in 2021, (during the pandemic). The participants took part in online, semi-structured interviews, mean duration 45-minutes (range 23–156 minutes), within six weeks of their ED visit. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Three key themes were identified: purpose, process and performance. The themes showed mixed understanding and low awareness of the purpose of NHS 111, despite its strong triage role. Long waits for call backs however, sometimes resulted in patients attending ED, along with previous negative perspectives and experiences. Conclusion. This research suggests enhanced visibility and knowledge of NHS 111 would increase its use by people with LBP. Further exploration comparing outcomes of callers to NHS 111 with those who seek care elsewhere, could help evaluate how NHS 111 can best help people with LBP and prevent unnecessary ED attendance. No conflicts of interest.  . Sources of funding. Funding for primary data: Health Education England & National Institute of Health and Care Research (ICA-CDRF-2018-04-ST2-040)

Aims and objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the indications for patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee prior to referral to an orthopaedic specialist, and ascertain whether these scans altered initial management. Materials and Method. We retrospectively reviewed all referrals received by a single specialist knee surgeon over a 1-year period. Patient demographics, relevant history, examination findings and past surgical procedures were documented. Patients having undergone MRI prior to referral were identified and indications for the scans recorded. These were reviewed against The NHS guidelines for Primary Care Physicians to identify if the imaging performed was appropriate in each case. Results. A total of 261 patients were referred between 1. st. July 2018 and 30. th. June 2019. 87/261 patients underwent MRI of the knee joint prior to referral. The mean patient age was 53 years with predominance of male patients (52 verses 35 females). 21/87 patients (24%) underwent the appropriate imaging prior to referral with only 13% of patients undergoing x-ray imaging before their MRI. In cases where MRI was not indicated, patients waited an average of 12 weeks between their scan and a referral being sent to the specialist knee surgeon. Conclusion. 76% of patients referred to orthopaedics had inappropriate MRI imaging arranged by their primary care physician. For a single consultant's referrals over 1 year these unnecessary MRI scans cost the NHS £13,200. Closer adherence to the guidelines by primary care physicians would result in a financial saving for the NHS, faster referral times and a more effective use of NHS resources

Abstract. Hospitals during Covid 19 were faced with extreme pressures notably on Emergency Departments. This led to delays in treatment for patients in Trauma and Orthopeadics. In order to support Emergency Departments and improve the service provided, this District General Hospital introduced a Specialty Doctor and Consultant led walk in trauma clinic running on weekdays from 9am-5pm. This abstract focusses on three factors. Firstly the time spent in A&E, secondly the time taken for patients to receive basic radiographic imaging and finally availability of the next fracture clinic appointment. A random sample of 100 patients were selected over a 4 week period prior to introduction of this service and compared with 100 patients since this service began. The average time spent in A&E before this service was 197 minutes which was reduced by 86% by to 27 minutes. The average time taken to receive basic imaging reduced by 18.5% from 81 minutes to 66 minutes. Finally prior to the introduction of these clinics the waiting time of the next fracture clinic varied from 3 to 17 days where as now the patient can be seen by a Consultant in a fracture clinic the next working day. Our findings show the walk in Trauma clinic service has proven to be an invaluable service to this DGH and the NHS. As a result of this service patients are receiving a higher quality of care sooner and a case can be made for the introduction of these clinics throughout the country

Aims. Diabetic foot care is a significant burden on the NHS in England. We have conducted a nationwide survey to determine the current participation of orthopaedic surgeons in diabetic foot care in England. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to all 136 NHS trusts audited in the 2018 National Diabetic Foot Audit (NDFA). The questionnaire asked about the structure of diabetic foot care services. Results. Overall, 123 trusts responded, of which 117 admitted patients with diabetic foot disease and 113 had an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon. A total of 90 trusts (77%) stated that the admission involved medicine, with 53 (45%) of these admissions being exclusively under medicine, and 37 (32%) as joint admissions. Of the joint admissions, 16 (14%) were combined with vascular and 12(10%) with orthopaedic surgery. Admission is solely under vascular surgery in 12 trusts (10%) and orthopaedic surgery in 7 (6%). Diabetic foot abscesses were drained by orthopaedic surgeons in 61 trusts (52%) and vascular surgeons in 47 (40%). Conclusion. Orthopaedic surgeons make a significant contribution to both acute and elective diabetic foot care currently in the UK. This contribution is likely to increase with the movement of vascular surgery to a hub and spoke model, and measures should be put in place to increase the team based approach to the diabetic foot, for example with the introduction of a best practice tariff. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):618–622

The MAKO Robotic arm is a haptic robotic system that can be used to optimise performance during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We present the outcome of the first 40 robotic cases performed in an NHS foundation trust along with the technique of performing robotic THA in our unit. Forty consecutive patients undergoing robotic THA (rTHA) were compared to a case matched group of patients undergoing manual THA (m-THA). 2:1 blinded case matching was performed for age, sex, implants used (Trident uncemented socket and cemented Exeter stem, Stryker Mahwah, NJ, US) and surgeon grade. Comparisons were made for radiological positioning of implants, including leg length assessment, and patient reported functional outcome (PROMS). Pre- and post-operative radiographs were independently analysed by 2 authors. All patients underwent THA for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis. No significant difference between groups was identified for post-operative leg length discrepancy (LLD) although pre-operatively a significantly higher LLD was highlighted on the MAKO group, likely due to patient selection. Significantly lower post-operative socket version was identified in the MAKO cohort although no difference in post-operative cup inclination was noted. However, there was significantly larger variance in post-op LLD (p=0.024), cup version (p=0.004) and inclination (p=0.05) between groups indicating r-THA was significantly less variable (Levene's test for homogeneity of variance). There was no significant difference in the number of cases outside of Lewinnek's ‘safe’ zone for inclination (p=0.469), however, there were significantly more cases outside Lewinnek's ‘safe’ zone for version (12.5% vs 40.3%, p=0.002) in the m-THA group. We report the commencement of performance of MAKO robotic THA in an NHS institution. No problems with surgery were reported during our learning curve. Robotic THA cases had less variability in terms of implant positioning suggesting that the MAKO robot allows more accurate, less variable implant positioning with fewer outliers. Longer term follow-up of more cases is needed to identify whether this improved implant positioning has an effect on outcomes, but the initial results seem promising

According to the Scottish Arthroplasty Project the mean inpatient LoS following a Total Hip Replacement (THR) has fallen from 10.3 days in 2001 to only 3.9 days. This reduction in patient LoS has lead units in the UK to follow the example of centres around the world in offering THR as a day case procedure. In this study we examine data gathered from the first 18 months of day case THR within a district general hospital elective orthopaedics unit. Data was collected prospectively from all patients undergoing THR within our district general hospital elective orthopaedic unit. Patients were selected to day case THR group via consultant review at outpatient clinic and anaesthetic assessment at pre-assessment clinics. Between August 2018 and February 2020 (18 months) 40 patients successfully underwent day case THR. None of the patients discharged home where readmitted within the next 30 days. The average age of successful day case THRs was 60 years old. The at 6 months post-op mean OHS was 45.1 and at 1 year post-op the mean score was 47.2. The average improvement in OHS was 21.1 at 6 months and 26.9 at 1 year post-op. All of the patients successfully discharged as day cases where satisfied with their care and all but one would recommend it to their friends and family. We have shown that day case THR is not only possible within an NHS district general hospital but gives exceptional patient outcomes with excellent patient satisfaction

Aims. Day-case arthroplasty is gaining popularity in Europe. We report outcomes from the first 12 months following implementation of a day-case pathway for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an NHS hospital. Methods. A total of 47 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 24 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients were selected for the day-case arthroplasty pathway, based on preoperative fitness and agreement to participate. Data were likewise collected for a matched control group (n = 58) who followed the standard pathway three months prior to the implementation of the day-case pathway. We report same-day discharge (SDD) success, reasons for delayed discharge, and patient-reported outcomes. Overall length of stay (LOS) for all lower limb arthroplasty was recorded to determine the wider impact of implementing a day-case pathway. Results. Patients on the day-case pathway achieved SDD in 47% (22/47) of THAs and 67% (16/24) of UKAs. The most common reasons for failed SDD were nausea, hypotension, and pain, which were strongly associated with the use of fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic. Complications and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Following the introduction of the day-case pathway, the mean LOS reduced significantly by 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5 days respectively in THA, UKA, and total knee arthroplasty cases (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Day-case pathways are feasible in an NHS set-up with only small changes required. We do not recommend fentanyl in the spinal anaesthetic for day-case patients. An important benefit seen in our unit is the so-called ‘day-case effect’, with a significant reduction in mean LOS seen across all lower limb arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):900–908

We report the impact of implementing a new short-stay hip and knee arthroplasty pathway in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital. This was enacted due to existing concerns with a long length of stay (LOS) and reduced elective operating capacity each winter due to emergency bed pressures. The overnight introduction of this pathway was aimed to reduce LOS, alleviate bed pressures, minimise readmission rates and generate financial savings, all combining to facilitate full elective activity during the winter. We conducted a prospective study at a regional tertiary arthroplasty centre. The new pathway was introduced across the service overnight. It includes rigorous preoperative optimisation, specific anaesthetic protocols and uniform changes in surgical practice to allow a focus on early mobilization and discharge on the day of surgery where possible. Data collection spanned 17 months, including the initial six months post implementation of the short-stay pathway. LOS data was collected for the full period and data was compared pre- and post-implementation of the new pathway. Patient satisfaction and 30-day readmission data were also collected. There was an immediate and significant decrease in median LOS from 4 days pre-implementation to 1 day post-implementation. Patient satisfaction was high, and the 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (5.95%), with no readmissions directly related to decreased inpatient stay. Financial analyses revealed substantial cost savings due to reduced LOS and the elimination of routine post-operative blood tests, estimated at over £1.6m per year. Elective activity over winter was significantly higher (79%) than in the same time period in the previous year. An acute introduction of a carefully planned and coordinated short-stay hip and knee pathway is safe, cost-effective and popular with patients, but also contributes to increased efficiency in the delivery of elective healthcare in the context of increasing demand and financial constraints in the NHS

Abstract. Introduction. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common post-operative complication which, in turn, significantly increases risk of other post-operative complications and mortality. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to evaluate and implement measures to decrease the incidence of AKI in post-operative Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) patients. Methods. Three data collection cycles were conducted using all T&O patients admitted to a single UK West Midlands NHS trust across three six-month periods between December 2018 and December 2020 (n=8215). Patients developing a post-operative AKI were identified using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Data was collected for these patients including demographic details and AKI risk factors such as ASA grade, hypovolaemia and use of nephrotoxic medications. Results. The percentage of post-operative AKI decreased from 2% (71 patients from 5899 operations) in the first cycles to 1.5% (19 from 1273 operations) by the final cycle. There was a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for AKI, including post-operative hypovolaemia (50%) and use of nephrotoxic aminoglycosides (81%). Measures implemented between cycles included a pre-operative medication review identifying nephrotoxic medications, early post-operative assessment for consideration of intravenous fluids and junior doctor teaching on fluid therapy. There was a substantial decrease in use of multiple nephrotoxic medications (98% to 59%) and in use of aminoglycosides (88% to 42%) between the final cycles which may explain the reduction in observed AKI incidence. Conclusion. This QIP highlights the benefits of a multifaceted approach in the peri-operative period, through targeting of risk factors in preventing post-operative AKI

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complex procedure which carries both a greater risk for patients and greater cost for the treating hospital than does a primary TKA. As well as the increased cost of peri-operative investigations, blood transfusions, surgical instrumentation, implants and operating time, there is a well-documented increased length of stay which accounts for most of the actual costs associated with surgery. We compared revision surgery for infection with revision for other causes (pain, instability, aseptic loosening and fracture). Complete clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 168 consecutive revision TKAs performed at a tertiary referral centre between 2005 and 2012. Revision surgery for infection was associated with a mean length of stay more than double that of aseptic cases (21.5 vs 9.5 days, p < 0.0001). The mean cost of a revision for infection was more than three times that of an aseptic revision (£30 011 (. sd. 4514) vs £9655 (. sd. 599.7), p < 0.0001). . Current NHS tariffs do not fully reimburse the increased costs of providing a revision knee surgery service. Moreover, especially as greater costs are incurred for infected cases. These losses may adversely affect the provision of revision surgery in the NHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:197–201

Introduction: Increasing numbers of patients are being treated outside traditional NHS hospitals as part of GSup (General supplemental funding) projects and other initiatives to reduce waiting lists. Concerns regarding these arrangements include case mix at NHS hospitals, quality of clinical care and patient satisfaction. Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between overall patient satisfaction following treatment within the NHS, as part of GSup or as an independent private patient. Methods: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty by a single consultant were contacted 6 to 18 months postop. 3 groups were formed; those treated in the local NHS hospital, patients treated as part of GSup and private patients independently financed. A previously validated patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed by each patient. This investigates satisfaction with admission, environment, healthcare professionals, treatment, leaving hospital and overall care. Fisher exact test used to compare groups for significant differences in responses, significance was assumed at p< 0.05 level. Results: 144 of 202 patients responded. Though generally high overall levels of satisfaction were reported, areas of concern were identified, particularly regarding cleanliness of hospital, the availability of nursing staff, maintenance of patient confidentiality and communication with patients. In all cases the GSup patients reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction compared with the NHS patients. 12% of NHS patients felt their overall care fell below “very good” compared with 0% of the GSup patients (p< 0.05). Discussion: Significant differences are identified between NHS and GSup patient satisfaction regarding hospital environment, healthcare professionals and overall standards of care. There were few differences between GSup and private patients treated in the same environment but where they did occur they were universally more positive for the GSup patients. Conclusions: Concerns that GSup patients may be less satisfied with their care appear unfounded; in general they were better satisfied than NHS patients

As part of the government’s initiative to reduce waiting times for major joint surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust sent 224 patients (258 knees) to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement. The Kinemax total knee replacement system was used in all cases. The cumulative survival rate at three years was 79.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69.2 to 86.8) using re-operation for any cause as an endpoint and 85.3% (95% CI 75.9 to 91.8) using aseptic revision as an endpoint. This is significantly worse than that recorded in the published literature. These poor results have resulted in a significant impact on our service

Introduction: Preoperative planning plays an important role in any surgical procedure and total hip replacement (THR) is no exception. Templating of radiographs allows preoperative assessment of the correct size of implant to be used, lowers the risk of periprosthetic fracture, helps restore femoral offset and leg length, facilitates the optimisation of alignment and ensures the correct implants sizes are available. With the wide scale use of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) in the National Health Service (NHS), the potential exists for faster and more accurate templating of THRs. Aim: In performing this study, we assessed whether there is adequate provision of the current NHS PACS to allow optimal digital templating for THRs. We also made comparison between the availability and overall ease of conventional versus digital templating. Methods: Data was collected using a telephone questionnaire requesting information from the on-call orthopaedic Specialist Registrar (SpR) in 28 Greater London and surrounding area NHS Hospitals. Data on the availability of PACS and the ability to template using hard-copy or digital templating was collected and analysed. Results: PACS were used in all 28 (100%) hospitals that were contacted. None performed conventional templating regularly and only 8 (28.6%) admitted to occasional templating. The predominant reason for this was difficulty in obtaining hard copies of x-rays in 12 (42.9%) hospitals, as well as lack of availability acetate templates, with 13 (46.4%) claiming that this was the case. Digital templating software was available in 14 (50%) hospitals. Despite this, none of them performed digital templating regularly. In the 50% that did have digital templating, this was not routinely done for the following reasons:. only 3 (10.7%) allowed easy access to the software to the SpRs. only one SpR received formal training on how to use the system. only one hospital regularly used Methods: to accurately allow the software to assess magnification for accurate sizing (e.g. sizing balls). Discussion: Digital PACS systems have made great improvement in the access of radiographs in the NHS. With regards to orthopaedic practice, however, we have shown that the benefit of digital templating is being overlooked within the NHS

As part of the national initiative to reduce waiting times for joint replacement surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust referred 224 patients to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement (TKR). A total of 258 Kinemax TKRs were performed between November 2004 and August 2006. Of these, a total of 199 patients (232 TKRs, 90%) have been followed up for five years. This cohort was compared with 258 consecutive TKRs in 250 patients, performed at Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre (CAVOC) over a similar time period. The five year cumulative survival rate was 80.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74.0 to 86.0) in the Weston-Super-Mare cohort and 95.0% (95% CI 90.2 to 98.2) in the CAVOC cohort with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The relative risk for revision at Weston-Super-Mare compared with CAVOC was 3.88 (p < 0.001). For implants surviving five years, the mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and mean EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores were similar (OKS: Weston-Super-Mare 29 (2 to 47) vs CAVOC 29.8 (3 to 48), p = 0.61; EQ-5D: Weston-Super-Mare 0.53 (-0.38 to 1.00) vs CAVOC 0.55 (-0.32 to 1.00), p = 0.79). Patients with revised TKRs had significantly lower Oxford knee and EQ-5D scores (p < 0.001). The results show a higher revision rate for patients operated at Weston-Super-Mare Treatment Centre, with a reduction in functional outcome and quality of life after revision. This further confirms that patients moved from one area to another for joint replacement surgery fare poorly

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are reported in patients taking bisphosphonates (BPs). This study aims to describe demographics, potential risk factors and outcome of fixation in AFFs. Forty-three patients with AFF were identified retrospectivity from all identified patients with subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fractures within NHS Grampian between 2008–2018. Patients were identified via hospital coding and electronic search of patients undergoing femoral fixation. AFFs were diagnosed by the 2014 American Society of Mineral and Bone Research diagnostic criteria by electronic patient record review by two investigators. Within this cohort, the incidence of AFF was 8.25% with male to female ratio of 10:1 and a mean of presentation age 73.3 years. 27.9% of AFFs occurred in the diaphysis. 22% of AFFs were bilateral. Mean follow-up was 11.5 months. 87.5% of patients had documented prodromal symptoms. 35% had proven radiological changes before fracture. All patients identified were on BPs. Duration of BPs before fracture was 5 months- 13.2 years (mean 6.3 years). Concurrent use of BPs with steroid and proton pump inhibitors was seen in 58.5%. All patients had intramedullary fixation with 8 (18.6%) requiring revision for non-union. For those that united radiologically it took on average 304 days (220–513). BPs were only stopped in 45% of patients after fixation. AFFs in this cohort appear to be associated with BP use, female sex, clinical and radiological prodrome. AFF remain a difficult clinical problem with a high revision rate. Further work is required to identify the temporal relationships and to raise awareness to improve surveillance/management

This trial aims to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives as a technique to introduce large-scale change and improve outcomes for patients undergoing primary elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty. 41 NHS Trusts that did not have; a preoperative anaemia screening and optimisation pathways, or a methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) decolonisation pathway, in place were randomised to one of two parallel collaboratives in a two arm, cluster randomised controlled trial. Each collaborative focussed on implementing one of these two preoperative pathways. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. 27 Trusts completed the trial. Outcome data were collected for procedures between November 2018 and November 2019. Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infections (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days) for the anaemia and MSSA arms respectively. Secondary outcomes include deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of stay, critical care admissions, and readmissions. Process measures include the proportion of patients receiving each preoperative initiative. 19,254 procedures from 27 Trusts are included. Process measures show both preoperative pathways were implemented to a high degree (75.3% compliance in MSSA arm; 61.2% anaemia arm), indicating that QICs can facilitate change in the NHS. However, there were no improvements in blood transfusions (2.9% v 2.3% adjusted-OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.52–2.75, p=0.67), MSSA deep SSIs (0.13% v 0.14% adjusted-OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.42–2.46, p=0.98), or any secondary outcome. Whilst no significant improvement in patient outcomes were seen, this trial shows quality improvement collaboratives can successfully support the implementation of new preoperative pathways in planned surgery in the NHS

Introduction: Elective Orthopaedics has been targeted by the department of health in the U.K. as a maximum six-month waiting time for operations could not be met. National Orthopaedic project was initiated as a consequence and Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) and well established private hospitals were utilised to treat NHS long wait patients. Materials and Methods: We audited the primary total hip replacements performed in our hospital in 1998 and 2003 to compare the differences in the patient characteristics in particular age, length of stay and ASA grade. Results: The number of hip replacements increased to 308 in year 2003 from 194 in year 1998. Whilst, the number of ASA I patients were the same, the ASA II. III, IV increased by 40%, 260%, 266% respectively. The average length of stay decreased from 14.3 to 11.9 days which was statistically significant, in spite of increased numbers of ASA II – IV patients. Discussion: The NHS hospitals are treating increasing number of patients who have a higher anaesthetic risk and are likely to stay longer in the hospital in the post-operative period. The case mix for primary total hip replacements in large tertiary referral hospitals have changed due to altered patient flow due to cherry picking of NHS waiting lists by the ISTC. NHS hospitals should be appropriately remunerated for dealing with complex cases and for managing complications referred by ISTC hospitals. In fact, the National joint registry’s 2. nd. annual report confirms that 40% of primary total hip replacements operated in ISTC’s were ASA I while only 25% of primary total hip replacements operated in NHS hospitals were ASA I. None of the ISTC’s performed complex primary THRs