Aims. The fundamental concept of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures has not changed appreciably since the 1960s and, whilst widely used, is associated with complications including wound dehiscence and infection, prominent hardware and failure. Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation (CRIF) using a fibular nail, wires or screws is biomechanically stronger, requires minimal incisions, and has low-profile hardware. We hypothesised that fibular nailing in the elderly would have similar functional outcomes to standard fixation, with a reduced rate of wound and hardware problems. Patients and Methods. A total of 100 patients (25 men, 75 women) over the age of 65 years with unstable ankle fractures were randomised to undergo standard ORIF or fibular nailing (11 men and 39 women in the ORIF group, 14 men and 36 women in the fibular nail group). The mean age was 74 years (65 to 93) and all patients had at least one medical comorbidity. Complications, patient related outcome measures and cost-effectiveness were assessed over 12 months. Results. Significantly fewer wound infections occurred in the fibular nail group (p = 0.002). At one year, there was no evidence of difference in mean functional scores (Olerud and Molander Scores 63; 30 to 85, versus 61; 10 to 35, p = 0.61) or scar satisfaction. The overall cost of treatment in the fibular nail group was £91 less than in the ORIF group despite the higher initial cost of the implant. Conclusion. We conclude that the fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures, with a significantly lower rate of soft-tissue complications, and is more cost-effective than ORIF. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1248–52

Aims. Proximal femur fractures treatment can involve anterograde nailing with a single or double cephalic screw. An undesirable failure for this fixation is screw cut-out. In a single-screw nail, a tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm has been associated with an increased risk of cut-out. The aim of the study was to examine the role of TAD as a risk factor in a cephalic double-screw nail. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fracture with a double proximal screw nail (Endovis BA2; EBA2) from January to September 2021. The analyzed variables were age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, fracture type, side, time of surgery, quality of reduction, pre-existing therapy with bisphosphonate for osteoporosis, screw placement in two different views, and TAD. The last follow-up was at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to study the potential factors of screw cut-out, and receiver operating characteristic curve to identify the threshold value. Results. A total of 98 of the 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 65 patients were female (66.3%), the mean age was 83.23 years (SD 7.07), and the mean follow-up was 378 days (SD 36). Cut-out was observed in five patients (5.10%). The variables identified by univariate analysis with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model were screw placement and TAD. The TAD was significant with an odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (p = 0.012) as the screw placement with an OR 4.35 (p = 0.043) in the anteroposterior view, and OR 10.61 (p = 0.037) in the lateral view. The TAD threshold value identified was 29.50 mm. Conclusion. Our study confirmed the risk factors for cut-out in the double-screw nail are comparable to those in the single screw. We found a TAD value of 29.50 mm to be associated with a risk of cut-out in double-screw nails, when good fracture reduction is granted. This value is higher than the one reported with single-screw nails. Therefore, we suggest the role of TAD should be reconsidered in well-reduced fractures treated with double-screw intramedullary nail. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(6):457–463

Aims. The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking. Methods. Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing. Results. A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking. Conclusion. In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):825–833

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes and the complication rate after nail and plate fixation of unstable fractures of the ankle in elderly patients. Methods. In this multicentre study, 120 patients aged ≥ 60 years with an acute unstable AO/OTA type 44-B fracture of the ankle were randomized to fixation with either a nail or a plate and followed for 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score. Secondary outcome measures were the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, the Olerud and Molander Ankle score, the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, a visual analogue score for pain, complications, the quality of reduction of the fracture, nonunion, and the development of osteoarthritis. Results. At 24 months, the median AOFAS score was equivalent in the two groups (nail 90 (interquartile range (IQR) 82 to 100), plate 95 (IQR 87 to 100), p = 0.478). There were statistically more complications and secondary operations after nail than plate fixation (p = 0.024 and p = 0.028, respectively). There were no other significant differences in the outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion. The functional outcome after nail and plate fixation was equivalent; however, the complication rate and number of secondary operations was significantly higher after nail fixation. These results suggest that plate fixation should usually be the treatment of choice for unstable ankle fractures in the elderly. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):72–81

To compare the long-term outcomes of fibular nailing and plate fixation for unstable ankle fractures in a cohort of patients under the age of 65 years. Patients from a previously conducted randomized control trial comparing fibular nailing and plate fixation were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Short term data were collected prospectively and long-term data were collected retrospectively using an electronic patient record software. Ninety-nine patients from one trauma centre were included (48 fibular nails and 51 plate fixations). Groups were matched for gender (p = 0.579), age (p = 0.811), body mass index (BMI)(p = 0.925), smoking status (p = 0.209), alcohol status (p = 0.679) and injury type (p = 0.674). Radiographically at an average of 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p = 0.851). Both groups had 1 tibio-talar fusion (2% of both groups) secondary to osteoarthritis with no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate between groups identified (p = 0.518,). Forty-five percent (n=42) of patients had so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=19, plate fixation n=23). No significant difference was found between groups at 10 years for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (p = 0.990), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (p = 0.288), Euroqol-5D Index (p = 0.828) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (p = 0.769). The current study illustrates no difference between fibular nail fixation and plate fixation at a long-term follow up of 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered

Aims. The management of a significant bony defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral nonunion remains a challenge. We present the outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilized with a long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis with a temporary monolateral fixator. Patients and Methods. Eight men and two women underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique between 2008 and 2016. Proximal locking of the nail and removal of the external fixator was undertaken once the length of the femur had been restored and prior to full consolidation of the regenerate. Results. The mean lengthening was 7 cm (3 to 11). The external fixator was removed at a mean of 127 days (57 to 220). The mean bone healing index was 28 days/cm and the mean external fixation index was 20 days/cm (11 to 18). There were no superficial or deep infections. Conclusion. This small retrospective study shows encouraging results for a combined technique, enabling compression of the femoral osteotomy, alignment, and controlled lengthening. Removal of the fixator and proximal locking of the nail reduces the risk of complications and stabilizes the femur with the maximum working length of the nail. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:634–9

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the failure of exchange nailing in nonunion of tibial diaphyseal fractures. . Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 tibial diaphyseal nonunions in 101 patients with a mean age of 36.9 years (15 to 74) were treated between January 1992 and December 2012 by exchange nailing. Of which 33 (32%) were initially open injuries. The median time from primary fixation to exchange nailing was 6.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 4.3 to 9.8 months). . The main outcome measures were union, number of secondary fixation procedures required to achieve union and time to union. . Univariate analysis and multiple regression were used to identify risk factors for failure to achieve union. . Results. Multiple causes for the primary nonunion were found for 28 (27%) tibiae, with infection present in 32 (31%). Six patients were lost to follow-up. Further surgical procedures were required in 35 (36%) nonunions. Other fixation modalities were required in five fractures. A single nail exchange procedure achieved union in 60/96 (63%) of all nonunions. Only 11 out of 31 infected nonunions (35.4%) healed after one exchange nail procedure. Up to five repeated exchange nailings, with or without bone grafting, ultimately achieved union in 89 (93%) fractures. The median time to union after exchange nailing was 8.7 months (IQR 5.7 to 14.0 months). Univariate analysis confirmed that an oligotrophic/atrophic pattern of nonunion (p = 0.002), a bone gap of 5 mm or more (p = 0.04) and infection (p < 0.001), were predictive for failure of exchange nailing Multiple regression analysis found that infection was the strongest predictor of failure (p < 0.001). . Conclusion. Exchange nailing is an effective treatment for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion. However, in the presence of severe infection with a highly resistant organism, or extensive sclerosis of the bone, other fixation modalities, such as Ilizarov treatment, should be considered. Take home message: Exchange nailing is an effective treatment for aseptic tibial diaphyseal nonunion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:534–41

Background:. External fixators are not as well tolerated around the femur when compared to the tibia. Lengthening with an intramedullary device is therefore attractive. Method:. We reviewed all cases of femoral lengthening performed at our unit from 2007 to 2014. Cases of non-unions, concurrent deformities, congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip were excluded. This left 33 cases for review. Healing index, implant tolerance and complications were compared. Results and Discussion:. In 20 cases the Precice lengthening nail was used and in 13 cases the LRS external fixator system. The desired length was achieved in all cases in the Precice group and in 12 of 13 cases in the LRS group. The Precice group had a more rapid return to full weight bearing. The mean healing index was 31.3 days/cm in the Precice and 47.1 days/cm in the LRS group. There was an increased incidence of complications with LRS lengthening, including pin site infections and regenerate deformity. Implant tolerance and the patients' perception of the cosmetic result were better with the Precice treatment. Conclusion:. We conclude excellent functional results with fewer complications and greater patient satisfaction in femoral lengthening with a Precice intramedullary nail

Aims. To compare the outcomes for trochanteric fractures treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail. Patients and Methods. A total of 400 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture were randomised to receive a SHS or a cephalomedullary nail (Targon PFT). All surviving patients were followed up to one year from injury. Functional outcome was assessed by a research nurse blinded to the implant used. Results. Recovery of mobility, as assessed by a mobility scale, was superior for those treated with the intramedullary nail compared with the SHS at eight weeks, three and nine months (p-values between 0.01 and 0.04), the difference at six and 12 months was not statistically significant (p = 0.15 and p = 0.18 respectively). The mean difference was around 0.4 points (0.3 to 0.5) on a nine point scale. Surgical time for the nail was four minutes less than that for the SHS (p < 0.001). Fracture healing complications were similar for the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between implants for any other recorded outcomes including the need for post-operative blood transfusion, wound healing complications, general medical complications, hospital stay or mortality. Conclusion. This study confirms the findings of a previous study that both methods of treatment produce similar results, although intramedullary fixation does result in marginally improved regain of mobility in comparison with the SHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1210–15

Introduction. The management of a significant bone defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral non-union remains a challenge. Traditional bone transport techniques require prolonged use of an external fixator with associated complications. We present our clinical outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilised with a deliberately long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis to restore segment length utilising a temporary monolateral fixator. Method. 9 patients underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique for the management of femoral non-union. Distraction osteogenesis was commenced on the 6. th. post-operative day. Proximal locking of the nail and removal of the external fixator was performed approximately one month after length had been restored. Full weight bearing and joint rehabilitation was encouraged throughout. Consolidation was defined by the appearance of 3 from 4 cortices of regenerate on radiographs. Results. 7 males and 2 females of adult age underwent treatment between 2009 and 2016. The mean lengthening was 6.6cm (3–10cm). The external fixator was removed at a mean 123 days (57–220), with an external fixation index of 20 days/cm. The regenerate healing index was 28 days/cm. There were no deep infections. Significant complications were seen in 4 patients including knee stiffness, a foot drop, delayed union of the non-union osteotomy (requiring exchange nailing and bone grafting) and revision nailing due to a prominent proximal tip. Conclusion. The combined over-sized intramedullary nail and external fixator enables compression of the femoral osteotomy, alignment of the bone and controlled lengthening. Once the length has been restored, removal of the external fixator and proximal locking of the nail reduces the risk of complications associated with the fixator and stabilises the femur with the maximum working length of the nail. This small retrospective study demonstrates encouraging results for this complex clinical scenario

We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study. Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 vs 40.4 minutes, p < 0.001; and 40.3 vs 54 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). There was an increased mean blood loss within the DHS group versus the Holland nail group (160 ml vs 78 ml, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean time to mobilisation with a frame was shorter in the Holland nail group (DHS 4.3 days, Holland nail 3.6 days, p = 0.012). More patients needed a post-operative blood transfusion in the DHS group (23 vs seven, p = 0.003) and the mean radiation time was shorter in this group (DHS 0.9 minutes vs Holland nail 1.56 minutes, p < 0.001). The screw of the DHS cut out in two patients, one of whom underwent revision to a Holland nail. There were no revisions in the Holland nail group. All fractures in both groups were united when followed up after one year. We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip

The Gamma nail is frequently used in unstable peri-trochanteric hip fractures. We hypothesised that mechanical failure of the Gamma nail was associated with inadequate proximal three-point fixation. We identified a consecutive series of 299 Gamma nails implanted in 299 patients over a five-year period, 223 of whom fulfilled our inclusion criteria for investigation. The series included 61 men and 162 women with a mean age of 81 years (20 to 101). Their fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans’ classification and the quality of fracture reduction was graded. The technical adequacy of three points of proximal fixation was recorded from intra-operative fluoroscopic images, and technical inadequacy for each point was defined. All patients were followed to final follow-up and mechanical failures were identified. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed, adjusting for confounders. A total of 16 failures (7.2%) were identified. The position of the lag screw relative to the lateral cortex was the most important point of proximal fixation, and when inadequate the failure rate was 25.8% (eight of 31: odds ratio 7.5 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 22.7), p < 0.001). Mechanical failure of the Gamma nail in peri-trochanteric femoral fractures is rare (< 1%) when three-point proximal fixation is achieved. However, when proximal fixation is inadequate, failure rates increase. The strongest predictor of failure is positioning the lateral end of the lag screw short of the lateral cortex. Adherence to simple technical points minimises the risk of fixation failure in this vulnerable patient group. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:825–30

Limb length deficiency, secondary to trauma or infection, is a common reason for referral to our tertiary service. After experiencing troubles with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD), we changed implant to the magnet operated Precice nail. We evaluated the safety and reliability of this novel device and compared it to our early ISKD results. To minimise variables, we selected femurs only. In total, we reviewed medical and radiographic records of 20 cases (8 ISKD, 12 Precise) from 2010–2015. At each postoperative visit, the accuracy and precision of distraction and complications were recorded. Accuracy reflected how close the measured lengthening was to the prescribed distraction at each postoperative visit. Precision reflected how close the repeated measurements were to each other over the course of total lengthening period. No patients were lost to follow-up (1–3.5 years). With the Precice nail (2012–2015), 11/12 were male and 10/12 were caused by trauma. The mean age was 34. Mean total lengthening was 38mm (range, 29–53mm), with an accuracy of 98percnt; and precision of 92percnt;. All patients achieved target lengthening at a rate of 1mm lengthening per day. In one case, the Precice nail fractured and this was revised successfully. With the ISKD group (2010–2012), 8/8 had complications (magnet jamming, nail breakage, equinus contractures and claw toes), with 25percnt; achieving accurate lengthening and precision of 38percnt;. Our results so far have justified our change in implant choice and, in our experience, support the Precice nail as being safe and precise

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of anterior knee pain after antegrade tibial nailing using suprapatellar and infrapatellar surgical approaches. Patients and Methods. A total of 95 patients with a tibial fracture requiring an intramedullary nail were randomized to treatment using a supra- or infrapatellar approach. Anterior knee pain was assessed at four and six months, and one year postoperatively, using the Aberdeen Weightbearing Test – Knee (AWT-K) score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain. The AWT-K is an objective patient-reported outcome measure that uses weight transmitted through the knee when kneeling as a surrogate for anterior knee pain. Results. A total of 53 patients were randomized to a suprapatellar approach and 42 to an infrapatellar approach. AWT-K results showed a greater mean proportion of weight transmitted through the injured leg compared with the uninjured leg when kneeling in the suprapatellar group compared with the infrapatellar group at all timepoints at all follow-up visits. This reached significance at four months for all timepoints except 30 seconds. It also reached significance at six months at 0 seconds, and for one year at 60 seconds. Conclusion. The suprapatellar surgical approach for antegrade tibial nailing is associated with less anterior knee pain postoperatively compared with the infrapatellar approach. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1138–1143

We investigated a new intramedullary locking nail that allows the distal interlocking screws to be locked to the nail. We compared fixation using this new implant with fixation using either a conventional nail or a locking plate in a laboratory simulation of an osteoporotic fracture of the distal femur. A total of 15 human cadaver femora were used to simulate an AO 33-A3 fracture pattern. Paired specimens compared fixation using either a locking or non-locking retrograde nail, and using either a locking retrograde nail or a locking plate. The constructs underwent cyclical loading to simulate single-leg stance up to 125 000 cycles. Axial and torsional stiffness and displacement, cycles to failure and modes of failure were recorded for each specimen. When compared with locking plate constructs, locking nail constructs had significantly longer mean fatigue life (75 800 cycles (. sd. 33 900) vs 12 800 cycles (. sd. 6100); p = 0.007) and mean axial stiffness (220 N/mm (. sd. 80) vs 70 N/mm (. sd. 18); p = 0.005), but lower mean torsional stiffness (2.5 Nm/° (. sd. 0.9) vs 5.1 Nm/° (. sd. 1.5); p = 0.008). In addition, in the nail group the mode of failure was either cut-out of the distal screws or breakage of nails, and in the locking plate group breakage of the plate was always the mode of failure. Locking nail constructs had significantly longer mean fatigue life than non-locking nail constructs (78 900 cycles (. sd. 25 600) vs 52 400 cycles (. sd. 22 500); p = 0.04). The new locking retrograde femoral nail showed better stiffness and fatigue life than locking plates, and superior fatigue life to non-locking nails, which may be advantageous in elderly patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:114–21

Introduction. The optimal treatment of elderly patients with unstable ankle fractures is a widely contested and as yet unresolved issue. Whereas the AO technique of anatomical reduction and plate fixation has been shown to give good functional results it is associated with a wound complication rate of up to 40%. This has led some surgeons to believe the risks of operative intervention are too great. The fibula nail is an intra-medullary device with the benefit of requiring minimal soft-tissue dissection. It provides lateral column support over a greater area than the standard plate. The study aims were to assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of a cohort of patients managed with the Fibula Nail (Acumed). Methods. A prospectively collected group of 36 patients with an unstable Weber B or C fracture were managed with a fibula nail. Outcome measures at one-year follow-up were Olerud and Molander ankle scores, radiographic measurements and complications. Results. At one-year follow-up the average Olerud and Molander score was 89/100. Four patients had died and none were lost to follow-up. Twenty-nine patients had normal radiographic measurements, one required a fusion due to fixation failure and two had signs of osteoarthritis. There were two lateral wound infections which both settled without metal work removal. Conclusions. Our case series has demonstrated similar one-year clinical and radiographical results for the fibular nail as previously published with the standard plate and screw technique with few wound complications. The results do indicate the fibula nail has a role in the management of this notoriously difficult fracture. Whether this cohort continues to do well however is unknown and will be the focus of future research

A single antegrade Rush nail was used to treat 37 fractures of the distal humerus extending to the olecranon fossa and up to 6.5 cm proximal to it. In order to stabilise the fracture, the bent tip of the Rush nail was directed into the lateral epicondylar ridge. This gave immediate stability. All the fractures united without residual stiffness of the shoulder or elbow

We treated 108 patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture using either the dynamic hip screw or the proximal femoral nail in this prospective, randomised series. We compared walking ability before fracture, intra-operative variables and return to their residence. Patients treated with the proximal femoral nail (n = 42) had regained their pre-operative walking ability significantly (p = 0.04) more often by the four-month review than those treated with the dynamic hip screw (n = 41). Peri-operative or immediate post-operative measures of outcome did not differ between the groups, with the exception of operation time. The dynamic hip screw allowed a significantly greater compression of the fracture during the four-month follow-up, but consolidation of the fracture was comparable between the two groups. Two major losses of reduction were observed in each group, resulting in a total of four revision operations. Our results suggest that the use of the proximal femoral nail may allow a faster postoperative restoration of walking ability, when compared with the dynamic hip screw

This prospective Randomised Controlled Trial compared two surgical approaches with respect to accuracy of guidewire and tibial nail position. Sixty-seven patients with tibial fractures were randomised to semi-extended (SE) or standard (S) approaches of nail insertion. Fluoroscopy was performed at guidewire insertion and final nail position. The SE approach is more proximal with the guidewire inserted posterior to the patella, theoretically allowing a better angle for more accurate nail placement. Measurements were taken in the Anteroposterior and lateral planes of both the nail and guidewire to determine deviation from the optimal angle of insertion (relative to the long axes of the tibial shaft). Thirty-nine and twenty-eight patients were treated with semiextended and standard approaches respectively. The semiextended approach resulted in improved nail placement to statistical significance in both planes, with mean deviation from the optimal angle of insertion as below:. Guidewire AP 3.2° (SE) versus 4° (S) Lateral 27.1° (SE) versus 30.2° (S). Nail AP 2.4° (SE) versus 4.2° (S) Lateral 17.9° (SE) versus 21.8° (S). Poor positioning of the guidewire leads to excessive anterior placement of the nail by eccentric reaming. Anterior positioning of the guidewire and nail in the lateral plane was assessed. This was expressed as a percentage from the anterior cortex of the tibia. Guidewire: Lateral 9.7% (SE) versus 9.3% (S). Nail: Lateral 23.4% (SE) 19.3% (S) (p 0.043). Semiextended nailing allows a better angle for guidewire placement and a more optimal final nail position. This facilitates accurate nail placement particularly in difficult proximal third fractures

Retrograde femoral nailing is gaining in popularity. We report a prospective, randomised comparison of antegrade and retrograde procedures in 68 patients with 69 fractures of the femoral shaft. All nails were inserted after appropriate reaming. There was no difference in operating time, blood loss, technical complications, size of nail or reamer, or transfusion requirements. There were more problems of length and rotation using a retrograde technique on a radiolucent table than with an antegrade approach on a fracture table. All fractures in both groups healed and there was no difference in the time taken to achieve union. Although retrograde nailing is a promising technique the skills required need practice. A longer period of follow-up is necessary to determine whether there are long-term problems in the knee after such surgery