The diagnosis of nerve injury using thermotropic liquid crystal temperature strips was compared blindly and prospectively against operative findings in 36 patients requiring surgical exploration for unilateral upper limb lacerations with suspected nerve injury. Thermotropic liquid crystal strips were applied to affected and non-affected segments in both hands in all subjects. A pilot study showed that a simple unilateral laceration without nerve injury results in a cutaneous temperature difference between limbs, but not within each limb. Thus, for detection of a nerve injury, comparison was made against the unaffected nerve distribution in the same hand. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an absolute temperature difference ≥ 1.0°C was diagnostic of a nerve injury (area under the curve = 0.985, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 93.8%). Thermotropic liquid crystal strip assessment is a new, reliable and objective method for the diagnosis of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. If implemented in the acute setting, it could improve the reliability of clinical assessment and reduce the number of negative surgical explorations

Abstract. Nerve transfer has become a common and often effective reconstructive strategy for proximal and complex peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. This case-based discussion explores the principles and potential benefits of nerve transfer surgery and offers in-depth discussion of several established and valuable techniques including: motor transfer for elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve injury, deltoid reanimation for axillary nerve palsy, intrinsic re-innervation following proximal ulnar nerve repair, and critical sensory recovery despite non-reconstructable median nerve lesions

Aims. We aimed to identify the pattern of nerve injury associated with paediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Patients and Methods. Over a 17 year period, between 1996 and 2012, 166 children were referred to our specialist peripheral nerve injury unit. From examination of the medical records and radiographs were recorded the nature of the fracture, associated vascular and neurological injury, treatment provided and clinical course. Results. Of the 166 patients (111 male, 55 female; mean age at time of injury was seven years (standard deviation 2.2)), 26 (15.7%) had neurological dysfunction in two or more nerves. The injury pattern in the 196 affected nerves showed that the most commonly affected nerve was the ulnar nerve (43.4%), followed by the median (36.7%) and radial (19.9%) nerves. A non-degenerative injury was seen in 27.5%, whilst 67.9% were degenerative in nature. Surgical exploration of the nerves was undertaken in 94 (56.6%) children. The mean follow-up time was 12.8 months and 156 (94%) patients had an excellent or good clinical outcome according to the grading of Birch, Bonney and Parry. Conclusion. Following paediatric supracondylar fractures we recommend prompt referral to a specialist unit in the presence of complete nerve palsy, a positive Tinel’s sign, neuropathic pain or vascular compromise, for consideration of nerve exploration. . Take home message: When managed appropriately, nerve recovery and clinical outcomes for this paediatric population are extremely favourable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:851–6

We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean 8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months (mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for 164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds. Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar, common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In 69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients: amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients continued in severe neuropathic pain. This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic pain syndromes

Aims. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury is a complication after periacetabular osteo-tomy (PAO) using an anterior approach, which might adversely affect the outcome. However, no prospective study has assessed the incidence and severity of this injury and its effect on the clinical outcomes over a period of time for longer than one year after PAO. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and severity of the symptoms of LFCN injury for ≥ three years after PAO and report its effect on clinical outcomes. Methods. A total of 40 hips in 40 consecutive patients who underwent PAO between May 2016 and July 2018 were included in the study, as further follow-up of the same patients from a previous study. We prospectively evaluated the incidence, severity, and area of symptoms following LFCN injury. We also recorded the clinical scores at one year and ≥ three years postoperatively using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) scores. Results. A total of 20 patients (50%) had symptoms of a LFCN injury at one year after PAO. At ≥ three years postoperatively, the symptoms had completely resolved in seven of these patients and 13 (33%) had persistent symptoms. The severity and area of symptoms did not significantly differ between one and ≥ three years postoperatively. The JHEQ showed significant differences in the patient satisfaction and mental scores between those with and those without sypmtoms of LFCN injury at ≥ three years postoperatively, while there was no significant difference in the mean SF-36 scores. Conclusion. The incidence of LFCN injury after PAO using an anterior approach is high. The outcome of PAO, ≥ three years postoperatively, is poorer in patients with persistent symptoms from a perioperative LFCN injury, in that patient satisfaction and mental health scores are adversely affected. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):11–16

Over 75% of combat casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan sustain injuries to the extremities, with 70% resulting from the effects of explosions. Damage to peripheral nerves may influence the surgical decision on limb viability in the short-term, as well as result in significant long-term disability. To date, there have been no reports of the incidence and severity of nerve injury in the current conflicts. A prospective assessment of United Kingdom (UK) Service Personnel attending a specialist nerve injury clinic was performed. For each patient the mechanism, level and severity of injury to the nerve was assessed and associated injuries were recorded. Fifty-six patients with 117 nerve injuries (median 2, range 1–5) were eligible for inclusion. This represents 12.9% of casualties sustaining an extremity injury. The most commonly injured nerves were the tibial (19%), common peroneal (16%) and ulnar nerves (16%). 25% (29) of nerve injuries were conduction block, 41% (48) axonotmesis and 34% (40) neurotmesis. The mechanism of injury did not affect the severity of injury sustained (explosion vs gunshot wound (GSW), p=0.53). An associated fracture was found in only 48% of nerve injuries and a vascular injury in 35%. The presence of an associated vascular injury resulted in more severe injuries (conduction vs axonotmesis and neurotmesis, p< 0.05). Nerves injured in association with a fracture, were more likely to develop axonotmesis (p< 0.05). The incidence of peripheral nerve injury from combat wounds is higher than previously reported. This may be related to increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex extremity wounds. In a polytrauma situation, it may be difficult to assess a discrete peripheral neurological lesion. As only 35% of nerves injured are likely to have anatomical disruption, the presence of an intact nerve at initial surgery should not preclude the possibility of an injury. Therefore, serial examinations combined with appropriate neurophysiologic examination in the post-injury period are necessary to aid diagnosis and to allow timely surgical intervention. In addition, conduction block nerve injuries can be expected to make a full recovery. As this accounts for 25% of all nerve injuries, we recommend that the presence of an insensate extremity should not be used as an indicator for assessing limb viability

Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon but serious complication of hip surgery that can adversely affect the outcome. Several studies have described the use of electromyography and intra-operative sensory evoked potentials for early warning of nerve injury. We assessed the results of multimodal intra-operative monitoring during complex hip surgery. We retrospectively analysed data collected between 2001 and 2010 from 69 patients who underwent complex hip surgery by a single surgeon using multimodal intra-operative monitoring from a total pool of 7894 patients who underwent hip surgery during this period. In 24 (35%) procedures the surgeon was alerted to a possible lesion to the sciatic and/or femoral nerve. Alerts were observed most frequently during peri-acetabular osteotomy. The surgeon adapted his approach based on interpretation of the neurophysiological changes. From 69 monitored surgical procedures, there was only one true positive case of post-operative nerve injury. There were no false positives or false negatives, and the remaining 68 cases were all true negative. The sensitivity for predicting post-operative nerve injury was 100% and the specificity 100%. We conclude that it is possible and appropriate to use this method during complex hip surgery and it is effective for alerting the surgeon to the possibility of nerve injury

The axillary nerve injuries most commonly are observed after trauma such as contusion-stretch, gunshot wound, laceration and iatrogenic injuries. Two of the most commons causes seem to be the glenohumeral dislocation and the proximal humerus fractures. The axillary nerve may sustain a simple contusion, or its terminal elements may be avulsed from the deltoid muscle. Compressive neuropathy in the quadrilateral space also has been reported (quadrilateral space syndrome, Calhill and Palmer, 1983). The axillary nerve injuries incidence represents less than 1% of all nerve injuries. Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze outcome in patients, who presented with injuries to the axillary nerve. Material and methods: We report a series of 15 cases of axillary nerve lesions, which were operated between 1995 and 2002. These injuries resulted from shoulder injury either with or without fracture and or dislocation. Patients were operated between 3 to 6 months after trauma and an anterior deltopectoral approach was usually followed during surgery. The follow up period ranged from 1 to 8 years. Results: The results were considered as satisfactory in 11 out of 15 axillary nerve lesions. According to clinical examination, of the function of the shoulder and the muscle strength the results were classified as excellent in 5 cases, good in 6 cases and poor in 4 cases. Conclusions: If indicated, nerve repair can lead to useful function in carefully selected patients

The effects of Hypericum perforatum on nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury have not yet been evaluated in all its aspects yet. In this experimental study, the effect of Hypericum perforatum on injured nerve tissue was histologically and biochemically investigated. Motor functional healing was surveyed by gait analysis. Rats were divided into 3 groups: Group I (n=8) was intact control group and no intervention and treatment was applied to this group. Group II (n=16) was surgical control group and Group III (n=16) was Hypericum perforatum group. After the operation, while any treatment was performed on Group II, 30 mg/kg dose Hypericum perforatum extract was intraperitoneally administered to the Group III per day for 8 weeks from the 1. st. day of post-op. Gait analysis was made to all rats for functional evaluation at 2. nd. , 3. rd. , 4. th. , 6. th. and 8. th. weeks, and sciatic functional index (SFI) was evaluated. At the end of the eighth week, sciatic nerve tissue samples were taken from the sacrificed rats. Tissues were examined biochemically, histologically and immnohistochemically. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as an indicator of oxidative stress and main antioxidant enzyme [superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT)] levels were biochemically measured. The nerve degeneration and regeneration were histologically viewed, and also cell count was immnohistochemically done by having done anti-S100 staining. It was seen that measurement results of SFI were statistically significantly difference between groups (p<0,001). In the sciatic nerve tissue samples taken from the rats, it was not determined a statistically significant difference between MDA, SOD, GPx and CAT levels detected by ELISA method (p>0,05). In the histological evaluation, it was seen that Hypericum perforatum affected positively the regeneration and immunohistochemically, it was found a statistically significant difference between the anti-S-100 positive cell numbers. The obtained results in this study show that; Hypericum perforatum, which was intraperitoneally administered on rats subjected to nerve injury, has affected positively the nerve regeneration and it can also provide an insight to future studies

Nerve injury is a rare complication of total hip replacement which may be related to the exposure used for the operation. The posterior approach is traditionally associated with injury to the sciatic nerve. We have compared the incidence of nerve injury after primary total hip replacement (THR) using either a posterior or a direct lateral approach. We studied 42 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. The surgeons used a posterior (22 patients) or direct lateral (20 patients) approach in accordance with their normal practice. The obturator, femoral, posterior tibial and common peroneal nerves were assessed clinically and electrophysiologically by electromyography (EMG) and measurement of the velocity of nerve conduction before operation and at four weeks after. All patients were free from symptoms of nerve injury after operation but five lesions were identified in four patients by the electrophysiological studies; the obturator nerve was involved in two, the femoral in one, the common peroneal in one and the posterior tibial in one. All these injuries occurred using the lateral approach. Clinical assessment alone underestimates the incidence of nerve injury complicating THR. Our study does not confirm the association of nerve injury with the posterior approach which had been described previously

We conducted an anatomical study to determine the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms. The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to 106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately 30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:789–94

The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in 18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14 fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in 30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis, and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2) vs 3.8 months (0.6 to 6); p = 0.0001). A total of 42 patients (47 lower limbs) presented with an insensate foot. By final review (mean 27.4 months (20 to 36)) plantar sensation was good in 26 limbs (55%), fair in 16 (34%) and poor in five (11%). Nine patients returned to full military duties, 18 to restricted duties, 30 to sedentary work, and 43 were discharged from military service. Effective rehabilitation must be early, integrated and vigorous. The responsible surgeons must be firmly embedded in the process, at times exerting leadership

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring. NNH is the number of cases needed to treat in order to have one adverse outcome. A systemic review was undertaken to calculate relative risks, risk difference and number needed to harm following management of supracon-dylar fractures with cross or lateral K wires. It was found that there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires. The aim of this study was to calculate the number of cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus that would need to be performed for one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury to occur. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus. To date there are no clinical trials showing the benefit of cross K wiring over lateral K wiring in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If it can be confirmed that lateral K wiring is as effective as crossed K wiring, iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury can be avoided. A systematic review of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries following management of supracondylar fractures was conducted. The databases MEDLINE 1966 – present, EMBASE 1980 – present, CINAHL 1982 – present, CDSR, and DARE were searched along with a meticulous search of the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics from 1998 to 2004. Of the two hundred and forty-eight papers identified, only thirty-six met the inclusion criteria. The papers where both lateral crossed K wires were used as treatment were identified for calculating relative rates, risk difference and number needed to harm. NNH was 7.69. When a sensitivity analysis removing two studies that had five subjects or fewer and a 100% ulnar nerve injury rate was peformed, the NNH was 27.7. In other words, there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between the occurance of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and frontal and saggital angular insertion of the medial pin in pediatric type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration. Method: Among 164 patients with type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures, treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration while the elbow was in hyperflexion, between 1999 and 2003, ninety patients (54 male and 36 female, mean age 6.1 years) with complete clinical and radiological records and follow-up period of at least 6 months were included the study. Frontal humerus-pin angle (FHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on an anteroposterior radiograph. Saggital humerus-pin angle (SHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on a lateral radiograph and expressed as a positive value if the medial pin direction was anteroposterior and as a negative value if the direction was posteroanterior. All the mesurements were made by the same observer blinded to the clinical records of the patients. Results: Postoperative ulnar nerve injury was observed in 18 patients. The ulnar nerve injury group and control group were similar with respect to age and gender. Mean FHPA was 36.6 and 33.8 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively (p=0.270). Mean SHPA was 12.1 and 1.6 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.001). All the patients with ulnar nerve injury had complete recovery within 3 months following surgery. Conclusion: There are several methods to avoid iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in supracondylar fractures such as insertion of two or three lateral pins, insertion of the medial pin while the elbow is less than 90 degrees of flexion. The findings of this retrospective study revealed that there was a considerable correlation between the occurence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and sagittal angular insertion of the medial pin. We suggest that if a crossed-pin figuration is desired, it is better to insert the medial pin neutral or posteroanterior direction in the sagittal plane if the elbow is in hyperflexion

Aims. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury is a potential complication after the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (DAA-THA). The aim of this study was to determine how the location of the fasciotomy in DAA-THA affects LFCN injury. Methods. In this trial, 134 patients were randomized into a lateral fasciotomy (n = 67) or a conventional fasciotomy (n = 67) group. This study was a dual-centre, double-blind, prospective randomized controlled two-arm trial with parallel group design and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The primary endpoint was the presence of LFCN injury, which was determined by the presence of numbness, decreased sensation, tingling, jolt-like sensation, or pain over the lateral aspect of the thigh, excluding the surgical scar, using a patient-based questionnaire. The secondary endpoints were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Assessments were obtained three months after surgery. Results. The incidence of LFCN injury tended to be lower in the lateral fasciotomy group (p = 0.089). In the lateral fasciotomy group, there were no significant differences in the mean PROM scores between patients with and without LFCN injury (FJS-12: 54.42 (SD 15.77) vs 65.06 (SD 26.14); p = 0.074; JHEQ: 55.21 (SD 12.10) vs 59.72 (SD 16.50); p = 0.288; WOMAC: 82.45 (SD 6.84) vs 84.40 (SD 17.91); p = 0.728). In the conventional fasciotomy group, there were significant differences in FJS-12 and JHEQ between patients with and without LFCN injury (FJS-12: 43.21 (SD 23.08) vs 67.28 (SD 20.47); p < 0.001; JHEQ: 49.52 (SD 13.97) vs 59.59 (SD 15.18); p = 0.012); however, there was no significant difference in WOMAC (76.63 (SD 16.81) vs 84.16 (SD 15.94); p = 0.107). Conclusion. The incidence of LFCN injury at three months after THA was comparable between the lateral and conventional fasciotomy groups. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term effects of these approaches. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(12):1252–1258

This presentation will provide an update of peripheral nerve anatomy and the classification of injury with pertinent clinical examples of each type. Recommendations for primary and secondary nerve suture and repair techniques for nerve injuries with and without segmental loss will be described

We report a case of iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury caused by pre-operative intraneural injection of local anaesthetic at total hip replacement. To our knowledge, this is unreported in the orthopaedic literature. We consider sacral nerve blockade in patients undergoing total hip replacement to be undesirable and present guidelines for the management of peri-operative sciatic nerve injury

Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the border of the PN. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new direct line along the joint capsule. In 28 adult patients, the closest distances from each line to the PN in standard knee MRI images were significantly shorter than arthroscopic position MRI images (all p-values < 0.05). All danger areas assessed in the actual arthroscopic position MRIs were included within the danger areas as assessed by the standard knee MRIs. We found that the standard knee MRIs can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated

Between 1998 and 2002, 37 neuropathies in 32 patients with a displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus who were referred to a nerve injury unit were identified. There were 19 boys and 13 girls with a mean age of 7.9 years (3.6 to 11.3). A retrospective review of these injuries was performed. The ulnar nerve was injured in 19, the median nerve in ten and the radial nerve in eight cases. Fourteen neuropathies were noted at the initial presentation and 23 were diagnosed after treatment of the fracture. After referral, exploration of the nerve was planned for 13 patients. Surgery was later cancelled in three because of clinical recovery. Six patients underwent neurolysis alone. Excision of neuroma and nerve grafting were performed in four. At follow-up, 26 patients had an excellent, five a good and one a fair outcome