Introduction The influence of timing of surgery on functional outcomes following spinal cord injury remains controversial. Animal studies suggest that the rate, degree, and duration of cord compression are the principal determinants of spinal cord injury (SCI) severity and prognosis for recovery. Delamarter et al, (J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995) have shown that when experimental cord compression in dogs is relieved within 1 hour, full motor recovery can be achieved. It is suggested by some clinically based research that definitive surgical treatment for unstable injuries results in fewer sequelae than prolonged immobilization and allows more rapid entry into rehabilitation. It is however the timing of this surgery which remains controversial. It has been suggested that early surgical management promotes neurological recovery by limiting secondary damage caused by inflammation, oedema, ischemia and instability. To date few studies have found a link between neurological recovery and timing of surgery (Fehlings, et al; Spine 2001).

Methods Data was gathered retrospectively by chart review of patients referred to the Princess Alexandra hospital with spinal cord injury. Patients were age matched into high and low velocity groups. This data was studied to assess the effects of energy of injury and timing of surgical intervention on neurological outcome. Patients either had anterior, posterior, or combined surgery, external immobilization or traction depending on the preference of the treating surgeon.

Results A cohort of 43 patients all of whom had spinal cord injury was retrospectively studied. Of these, 21 had a high energy injury (eg. MVA) and 21 had a low energy injury (eg. rugby). 28 had anterior stabilization 7 had traction, 4 had external immobilization 2 had a combined anterior / posterior fixation and 1 had posterior stabilization. The data suggest that the prognosis for recovery following a spinal cord injury is unrelated to the energy involved. The low energy group improved on average 0.6 ASIA grades (SEM 0.16) while the high energy improved 0.7 ASIA grades (SEM 0.17). The timing of definitive intervention for patients with incomplete cord lesions was shown to significantly (p=0.029) effect ultimate functional outcomes. Those with early (within 8hrs) intervention improved an average of 1.4 ASIA grades (SEM 0.21) and those with late intervention improved 0.6 ASIA grades (SEM 0.19). This effect was present in both high and low energy injury groups.

Discussion The timing of definitive intervention for spinal cord injury is still controversial. However there is Class II evidence that early surgery can be done safely in a patient with spinal cord injury (Fehlings, et al; Spine 2001). The findings from this retrospective study suggest that early surgical intervention may improve neurological recovery.

Introduction:

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative condition that results in a non-traumatic, progressive and chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord.

Surgery is indicated for patients with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive myelopathy. Literature shows that decompressive surgery halts progression of the condition. We undertook this study to see if there is a worthwhile improvement in function in patients who had spine decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Surgical decompression of the spinal canal is presently accepted worldwide as the method of treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficit in the belief that neurological recovery may be produced or enhanced. Our clinical and laboratory experience, however, indicates that the paralysis occurs at the moment of injury and is not related to the position of the fragments of the fracture on subsequent imaging. Since the preoperative geometry of the fracture may be of no relevance, our hypothesis, backed by more than two decades of operative experience, is that alteration of the canal by ‘surgical clearance’ does not affect the neurological outcome.

We have reviewed the existing world literature in an attempt to find evidence-based justification for the variety of surgical procedures used in the management of these fractures. We retrieved 275 publications on the management of burst fractures of which 60 met minimal inclusion criteria and were analysed more closely. Only three papers were prospective studies; the remainder were retrospective descriptive analyses. None of the 60 articles included control groups. The design of nine studies was sufficiently similar to allow pooling of their results, which failed to establish a significant advantage of surgical over non-surgical treatment as regards neurological improvement. Significant complications were reported in 75% of papers, including neurological deterioration. Surgical treatment for burst fracture in the belief that neurological improvement can be achieved is not justified, although surgery may still occasionally be indicated for structural reasons. This information should not be withheld from the patients.

Aims

The aim of the present study was to analyze the oncological and neurological outcome of patients undergoing interdisciplinary treatment for primary malignant bone and soft-tissue tumours of the spine within the last seven decades, and changes over time.

The revised Tokuhashi score has been widely used to evaluate indications for surgery and predict survival in patients with metastatic spinal disease. Our objective was to determine whether the score accurately predicted survival in those with MSCC. Retrospective analysis. All patients with MSCC presenting to our unit were included in this study from October 2003 to December 2009. Patients were divided into three groups – Tokuhashi score 0 – 8, 9 – 11 and 12 -15. Neurological outcome and survival. A total of 109 patients with MSCC were managed in our unit during this time. Mean age of patients was 61 years (range 7 - 86). Mean and median survival was 350 (5-2256) and 93 days in the 0-8 group, 439 (8-1902) and 229 days in the 9-11 group, and 922 (6-222) and 875 days in the 12-15 group; p = 0.01. All patients underwent decompression and stabilisation surgery. The rate of consistency between the prognostic score and actual survival was 64% (0-8), 64% (9-11) and 69% (12-15). Overall the consistency was 66%. There was no difference in neurological outcome between the 3 groups. There was a significant difference in the mean survival between groups. There was a moderate consistency between predicted and actual survival in this group of patients who all had cord compression. All patients had undergone some form of decompression and stabilisation surgery regardless of the overall revised Tokuhashi score

To assess whether the timing of surgery is an important factor in neurological outcome in patients with MSCC. Retrospective review. All patients with MSCC presenting to our unit were included in this study from October 2003 to December 2009. Patients were divided into three groups - those who underwent surgery within 24 hours (Group 1), those 24 hours to 48 hours (Group 2) and those greater than 48 hours (Group 3). Neurological outcome (improvement in Frankel score), complication rate and survival were assessed in all groups. A total of 109 patients with MSCC were operated on in our unit during this time. Mean age of patients was 61 years (range 7 - 86). The number that had at least one grade of Frankel improvement was 21 /37 (57%) in group 1; 11/17 (65%) in group 2 and 20/49 (41%) in group 3, p=0.03. When patients treated less than 24 hours were compared with those greater than 24 hours, the Frankel grade improvement approached significance (p=0.05). When we compared those who had surgery within 48 hours and those greater than 48 hours, the Frankel grade improvement was highly significant (p=0.009). There was no difference in survival or complications between the groups. Our results suggest that early surgical treatment in patients with MSCC gives a better neurological outcome but has no influence on survival or complication rates

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI).

The most common injury in rugby resulting in spinal cord injury (SCI) is cervical facet dislocation. We report on the outcome of a series of 57 patients with acute SCI and facet dislocation sustained when playing rugby and treated by reduction between 1988 and 2000 in Conradie Hospital, Cape Town. A total of 32 patients were completely paralysed at the time of reduction. Of these 32, eight were reduced within four hours of injury and five of them made a full recovery. Of the remaining 24 who were reduced after four hours of injury, none made a full recovery and only one made a partial recovery that was useful. Our results suggest that low-velocity trauma causing SCI, such as might occur in a rugby accident, presents an opportunity for secondary prevention of permanent SCI. In these cases the permanent damage appears to result from secondary injury, rather than primary mechanical spinal cord damage. In common with other central nervous system injuries where ischaemia determines the outcome, the time from injury to reduction, and hence reperfusion, is probably important.

In order to prevent permanent neurological damage after rugby injuries, cervical facet dislocations should probably be reduced within four hours of injury.

We analysed the influence of the timing of surgery (< 48 hours, group 1, 21 patients vs > 48 hours, group 2, 14 patients) on the neurological outcome and restoration of mobility in 35 incomplete tetra- and paraplegic patients with metastatic spinal-cord compression.

Pain and neurological symptoms were assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale. More improvement was found in group 1 than in group 2 when comparing the pre-operative findings with those both immediately post-operatively (p = 0.021) and those at follow-up at four to six weeks (p = 0.010). In group 1 the number of pre-operatively mobile patients increased from 17 (81%) to 19 patients (90%) whereas the number of mobile patients in group 2 changed from nine (64%) to ten (71%).

These results suggest that early surgical treatment in patients with metastatic spinal-cord compression gives a better neurological outcome even in a palliative situation.