Computer navigation has been advocated as a means to improve limb and component alignment and reduce the number of outliers after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the alignment outcomes of 1500 consecutive computer-assisted TKAs performed by a single surgeon, using the same implant, with a minimum 1 year follow-up, and to analyze the outliers. Based on radiographic analysis, 112 limbs (7.5%) in 109 patients with mechanical axis malalignment of > 3° were identified and analyzed.

The indication for TKA was osteoarthritis in 107 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 patients. Fifty-eight patients (53%) had undergone simultaneous bilateral TKA and 13 patients (12%) had a BMI >30. Preoperative varus deformity was seen in 100 limbs and valgus deformity in 12 limbs. Thirty limbs (27%) had an extra-articular deformity (2 post HTO limbs, 3 malunited fractures, 1 stress fracture, 21 severe femoral bowing and 3 tibial bowing) and 21 limbs (19%) had severe lateral laxity or subluxation. Thirty-eight limbs (34%) had a preoperative deformity of =10° and 24 limbs (21.5%) had varus or valgus deformity of >20°.

Postoperatively, 11 limbs were malaligned at ±3°, 74 limbs at ±4°, 22 limbs at ±5°, 2 limbs at ±6°, and 2 limbs at ±7°. Coronal plane malalignment of > ±3° of the femoral component was seen in 28 limbs, tibial component in 32 limbs, and both femoral and tibial components in 13 limbs. Twenty-six limbs with preoperative varus deformity had a postoperative valgus alignment of >183° and 3 limbs with valgus deformity had a postoperative varus alignment of <177°.

The incidence of outliers for postoperative limb alignment was low at 7.5% with the tibial component showing a higher incidence of coronal malalignment. Malalignment may be more common in cases of simultaneous bilateral procedures, preoperative limb alignment of =10°, limbs with extra-articular deformities and severe lateral instability. There was a tendency towards over-correction of the hip-knee-ankle axis in both varus- and valgus-deformed knees. Further detailed statistical analysis of the data will be presented.

This is the largest single-surgeon series of consecutive navigated TKAs and consequently the largest analysis of outliers that highlights which knees are likely to fall outside the +3 degrees of acceptable alignment and which therefore behoove the surgeon to exercise greater caution.

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) improves mechanical alignment and the accuracy of surgical cuts in the context of total knee arthroplasty. A simplified, CAOS enhanced instrumentation system was assessed to determine if the same effects could be achieved through the use of a less intrusive system. Two cohorts of surgeons (experienced and trainees) performed a series of total knee arthroplasty resections in knee models with and without navigation-enhanced instrumentation. The percentage of resections that deviated from the planned cut by more than 2°or 2mm (outliers) was determined by post-resection advanced imaging for six unique outcome metrics. Within each experience level, the use of the CAOS enhanced system significantly reduced the total percentage of outliers as compared to conventional instrumentation (Figure 1). The experienced users improved from 35% to 4% outliers overall (p < .001) and the trainees from 34% to 10% outliers (p < .001). Comparing across experience levels, the experienced surgeons performed significantly better in only a single resection metric with conventional instrumentation (Figure 2A), varus/valgus tibial alignment, with 8.3% outliers compared to the trainee's 63% outliers (p = .004). The use of CAOS enhanced instrumentation eliminated any differences between the two user groups for all measured resections (Figure 2B). Comparing CAOS enhanced to conventional instrumentation specifically between anatomical deformity types revealed that there is significant improvement (p < .05) with the use of enhanced instrumentation for all three deformity types (Figure 3). These results suggest that non-intrusive CAOS enhanced instrumentation is a viable alternative to conventional instrumentation with possible benefits. This trial also demonstrates that additional experience may not correlate to improved surgical accuracy, and outliers may be less a result of individual surgeon ability or specific anatomic deformities, and more so related to limitations of the instrumentation used or other yet unidentified factors.

Background

Coronal malalignment has been proposed as a risk factor for mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In response to these concerns, technologies that provide intraoperative feedback to the surgeon about component positioning have been developed with the goal of reducing rates of coronal plane malalignment and improving TKA longevity. Imageless hand-held portable accelerometer technology has been developed to address some the limitations associated with other computer assisted navigation devices including line-of-sight problems, preoperative imaging requirements, extra pin sites, up-font capital expenditures, and learning curve. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of a hand-held portable navigation system versus conventional instrumentation for tibial and femoral resections in TKA.

Introduction

The conventional bone resection technique in TKA is recognized as less accurate than computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-matched instrumentation (PMI). However, these systems are not available to all surgeons performing TKAs. Furthermore, it was recently reported that PMI accuracy is not always better than that of the conventional bone resection technique. As such, most surgeons use the conventional technique for distal femur and proximal tibia resection, and efforts to improve bone resection accuracy with conventional technique are necessary. Here, we examined intraoperative X-rays after bone resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia with conventional bone resection technique. If the cutting angle was not good and the difference from preoperative planning was over 3º, we considered re-cutting the bone to correct the angle.

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to PMI or standard intramedullary jigs. Smith and Nephew's patient specific cutting blocks (Visionaire) were used for PMI. Postoperative component positioning was investigated using the ‘Perth CT protocol’. Deviation of more than 3° from the recommended position was regarded as an outlier. Exact Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare component positioning and difference in proportion of outliers was calculated using Chi Squared analysis. Fifty-five knees were enrolled in the standard instrumentation group and fifty-two knees in the PMI group. Coronal femoral alignment was 0.7 ± 1.9° (standard) vs 0.5 ± 1.6° (PMI) (P=0.33). Outliers 9.4% vs 7.4% (P=0.71). Coronal tibial alignment was 0.4 ± 1.5° (standard) vs 0.6 ± 1.4° (PMI) (P=0.56). Outliers 1.9% vs 1.9% (P=0.99). Sagittal femoral alignment was 0.6 ± 1.5° (standard) vs 1.3 ± 1.9° (PMI) (P=0.07). Outliers 3.8% vs 13.2% (P=0.09). Tibial slope was 1.7 ± 1.9 ° (standard) vs 1.8 ± 2.7° (PMI) (P=0.88). Outliers 13.2% vs 24.1% (P=0.15). External rotation of femoral component was 0.6 ± 1.4° (standard) vs 0.2 ± 1.8° (PMI) (P=0.14). Outliers: 3.8% vs 5.6% (P=0.66). Compared to standard intramedullary jigs, patient matched instrumentation does not improve component positioning or reduce alignment outliers

BACKGROUND. The aim of Patient-specific instrumentation surgery is to improve accuracy and limit the range of surgical variability. The main purpose of this study is to summarize and compare the radiographic outcomes of TKA performed using Patient-specific instrumentation compared with conventional techniques. PURPOSES. In this study, we compared varus/valgus of the individual prosthesis components, rotation of femoral components and posterior slope of tibial components of 40 TKAs performed using a patient-specific technique with values from a matched control group of patients who were operated on by conventional intramedullary alignment technique. METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated 55 primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis: conventional instrumentation using the PFC Sigma (n = 15) patient-specific instrumentation using GMK MyKnee© (n = 40). Varus/valgus of the individual prosthesis components, rotation of femoral components and posterior slope of tibial components were measured from CT images taken post operation, whether there were more outliers with one of the two methods. The fraction of outliers (> 3°) was determined. RESULTS. There was excellent reliability with low standard deviations for the determination of femoral component rotation and varus/valgus of the tibial components. There were significantly more outliers in the conventional (26.7%) group than in the patient-specific instrument group (10.0%). Outliers in Varus/valgus of femoral components were comparable between groups (7.5% in the patient-specific instrument group and 6.7% in the conventional instrument group). Other parameters such as posterior slope of tibial components did not differ in terms of outliers. CONCLUSIONS. In this study, Patient-specific instrument was effective in significantly reducing outliers of rotational femoral component and varus/valgus of the tibial components alignment during TKA. Therefore, additional studies are needed to determine whether patient-specific instrumentation improves clinical function or patient satisfaction

Introduction. The limited field of view with less-invasive hip approaches for total hip arthroplasty can make a reliable cup positioning more challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cup placement between the traditional transgluteal approach and the anterior approach in a routine setting. Objectives. We asked if the (1) accuracy, (2) precision, and (3) number of outliers of the prosthetic cup orientation differed between three study groups: the anterior approach in supine position, the anterior approach in lateral decubitus position, and the transgluteal approach in lateral decubitus position. Methods. In a retrospective comparative study we compared the inclination and anteversion of the cup after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a consecutive series of 325 patients (350 hips). The transgluteal approach group consisted of 67 hips operated in lateral decubitus position; the anterior approach in supine position consisted of 127 operated and the anterior approach in lateral decubitus position consisted of 156 hips. The aim of the cup orientation was Lewinnek's safe zone defined by an inclination of 40±10° and an anteversion of 15°±10°. The postoperative cup orientation was determined using a validated computer-assisted method based on statistical shape modeling. This method allows the virtual creation of an accurate three-dimensional pelvic model for each individual patient based on the two-dimensional anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The inclination and anteversion was then calculated relative to the anterior pelvic plane – a natural reference plane for the calculation of inclination and anteversion. Accuracy was defined as the difference from the cup orientation to Lewinnek's target value. Precision was defined as the standard deviation of the two angles. Outliers were characterized by an anteversion or inclination angle outside of Lewinnek's safe zone. Results. (1) The accuracy of the anterior approach in supine position did not differ compared to the transgluteal approach, but differed to the anterior approach in supine position for inclination (p=0.882; p<0.001) (Figure 1) and anteversion (p = 0.014; p<0.001) (Figure 2). (2) The precision of the anterior approach in supine position was significantly higher compared to the transgluteal approach (p<0.001) and the anterior approach in lateral decubitus position for anteversion (p<0.001 for both groups) and inclination (p<0.001 for both groups) (Figure 3). (3) There was a significantly reduced number of outliers for the anterior approach in supine position compared to the anterior approach in lateral position (p=0.001) but not in comparison to the transgluteal approach (p=0.999) (Figure 2). Conclusions. The anterior approach in supine position results in a more precise placement of the prosthetic cup both for inclination and anteversion. Cup placement with less-invasive approaches does not lead to a higher variability of cup placement despite the more limited surgical field of view. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Purpose. 182 AMIS Total Hip Replacements were analysed for implant placement using the IMATRI system to evaluate the accuracy of the minimal invasive technique. These hips were done in two different periods to assess if the measurement and analyses of the implant placement improved over time. Methods. 182 Consecutive AMIS Total Hip Replacements were performed during two different periods. Postoperative X-rays were done on all cases in the recovery room and the images were all uploaded to the IMATRI system. Leg length discrepancy, acetabular cup inclinations and anteversion were measured using predetermined morphing systems. Data were then analysed to define accuracy of implant placement. Outliers were also analysed to explain possible reasons. Summary. 70% of the cases had leg lengths within 5mm of the opposite hip with range of −9 to +25 mm leg length difference. Acetabular cup anteversion varied from 5° to 30° with 72% between 10° and 20° anteversion. Acetabular cup inclination varied from 27° to 58° with 87% between 35° and 55°. Implant positioning improved during the second period, especially in the degree of anteversion with 77% of prosthesis between 5° and 25°deg anteversion. NO DISCLOSURES

Purpose Of Study. The study was started in 2004 to determine the best bearing surface in the long term, and to measure the metal ion levels generated by each of the bearing surfaces. We present the latest updated results. Material and methods. A prospective randomised study was started in 2004 to compare the wear characteristics of Ceramic on X linked Polyethylene (C.O.P.), Ceramic on Ceramic (C.O.C), Ceramic on Metal (C.O.M.) and Metal on Metal (M.O.M) bearings. The level of Cobalt and Chrome ions in red blood cells have been documented at serial intervals, using the ICP – MS method. Aside from the bearing surfaces the rest of the implant is standard, using a Pinnacle Cup, Corail Stem and 28mm heads. 256 Cases were enrolled on the study. To date 71 cases have been lost due to death (26), revision (9) and lost to follow up (36), leaving us with 185 for follow-up. An even spread of cases in each bearing surface are still available for follow up, viz. 46 C.O.P, 48 C.O.C., 44 C.O.M. and 47 M.O.M. Average follow up is currently 4.8 years, ranging up to 9 years. Results. To date no difference could be determined on the wear properties, with all bearings being acceptable. The only wear that could be measured was with C.O.P. bearings. Metal ion levels at no stage have been raised in the C.O.P. and C.O.C. bearings. Initially C.O.M. bearings had lower levels than M.O.M. bearings, but by 36 months were virtually the same with the mean below the 2ug/L level. At 60 month follow up values on almost half of the cases show markedly lower metal ions in the C.O.M. group. Outliers in both groups were associated with poorly placed cups, with the C.O.M. bearing being more forgiving that the M.O.M. group. Conclusion. To date the C.O.P. and C.O.M. bearings are performing the best of the 4 bearing combinations. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. It is widely accepted that computer navigation more reliably restores neutral mechanical alignment than conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) based instrumentation has been introduced to the market with a rapid growth in usage. However, a paucity of comparative data still exists on the precision of magnetic resonance (MR) based instruments in achieving acceptable lower limb alignment when compared to other validated techniques. In this analysis, we compare the radiographic outcomes of 3 techniques to achieve satisfactory prosthetic alignment by 2 surgeons using the same prosthesis and surgical technique. Methods. A series of 180 patients who had undergone TKA surgery were included in this study. Two fellowship-trained knee surgeons performed all surgeries using the same cemented, posterior stabilized implants (NexGen, Zimmer, Warsaw, In). Patients were stratified in to 3 groups according to the technique used to align the knee; 1. Conventional Intra-medullary Instrumentation, 2. Computer Navigation (Orthosoft), and 3. MR-based guides (Zimmer PSI). All patients underwent a post-operative CT Perth Protocol to assess coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial implants. A radiographer who was blinded to the alignment technique used performed all radiographic measurements. Outliers were defined at a deviation of more than 3 degrees from the mechanical axis in all planes of motion. Results. The radiographic outcome measures will be presented to highlight the significant differences between 3 groups. In addition, the early surgical experience with the introduction of MR based instruments will be reviewed along with the early problems encountered from tibial sagittal alignment that became apparent with time. Conclusion. The rapid introduction of MR based instruments in to the market by several prosthetic companies has occurred without adequate pre-release analysis. This study will allow surgeons to make an informed decision on whether to use this technology based on validated radiographic measures, when compared to both conventional alignment techniques and computer navigation

Restoration of the native joint line in total knee arthroplasty is important in restoring ligamentous balance and normal knee kinematics. Failure to achieve this could lead to reduced range of motion, patellofemoral maltracking and suboptimal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical and functional outcome of patients who demonstrated joint line changes after computer-assisted (CAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective study was conducted for 168 patients (168 knees) who underwent CAS TKA by two surgeons at a single institution with an average follow-up of two years. The final change in joint line was calculated from the verified tibial resection, distal and posterior femoral cuts. Group A patients had joint line changes of less than 4mm and Group B patients had joint line changes of more than 4mm. Postoperative Oxford scores, Knee scores, Function scores and SF-36 scores were obtained at six months, one year and two years post-TKA. The final range of motion and the mechanical alignment were documented. There was significant linear correlation between joint line changes and Oxford scores (p = 0.05) and Function scores (p = 0.05) at six months and Oxford scores alone at two years with increasing joint line changes having poorer outcome scores. Group A compared to Group B patients have better outcomes in terms of Oxford scores (mean 20 vs 27, p = 0.0003), Function scores (mean 69 vs 59, p = 0.03), SF-1 (mean 63 vs 50, p = 0.03), SF-2 (mean 66 vs 43, p = 0.05), SF-5 (mean 75 vs 63, p = 0.04), SF-6 (mean 84 vs 59, p = 0.003), SF-7 (mean 96 vs 83, p = 0.02), SF-8 (mean 84 vs 73, p = 0.006) and total SF-36 scores (mean 603 vs 487, P = 0.003), at six months, and Oxford scores (mean 18 vs 23, p = 0.0007) at two years. In this study, CAS is a useful intra-operative tool for assessing the final joint line in TKA. Outliers in joint line changes of ≥ 4 mm are associated with poorer clinical outcome scores

The radiologic and clinical results of High Tibial Osteotomies (HTO) strongly rely on the accuracy of correction, and inadequate intraoperative measurements of the leg axis can lead to over or under- correction. Over the past few years, navigation systems have been proven that navigation systems provide reliable real-time intro-operative information, may increase accuracy, and improves the precision of orthopaedic surgeries. We assessed the radiological and clinical results of navigation- assisted open wedge HTO versus conventional HTO at 24 months after surgery. A total of sixty-five open wedge HTOs were performed using navigation system and compared with forty-six open HTOs that had been performed using the conventional cable technique in terms of intraoperative leg axis assess. The Orthopilot navigation system (HTO version 1.3, B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttligen, Germany) used throughout the procedure of navigated open wedge HTO. The aim of the correction was to achieve of 3°of valgus (2–4°) on both method. For the radiological evaluation, postoperative leg axes were examined using weight bearing full-leg radiography obtained at postoperative two years after surgery. To assess correction accuracies, we compared mechanical tibiofemoral angles and intersections of the mechanical axis of the tibial plateau (%) in both groups. Outliers were defined as under-corrections of < 2° of valgus and as over-corrections of > 5° of valgus. The posterior slope of the proximal tibia was measured using the proximal tibial anatomical axis (PTAA) method. HSS (Hospital for Special Surgery) scores and ROMs (ranges of motion) were evaluated and all complications were recorded and surgical and radiation times were measured. Navigated HTOs corrected mechanical axes to 2.8° valgus (range −3.1∼5.3) with few outliers (9.5%), and maintained posterior slopes (8.5±2.3° preoperatively and 11.0±2.8° postoperatively) (P>0.05). In the conventional group, the mean valgus correction was satisfactory (2.2° valgus), but only 67.4% were within the required range (2∼5° valgus), and 26.1% of cases were under-corrected and 6.5% of cases were over-corrected. Posterior slope increased from 8.0° to 10.6° on average without significant change after surgery. Total fluoroscopic radiation time during navigated HTO was 8.1 seconds (5∼12s) as compared with 46.2 seconds (28∼64 s) during conventional HTO (p<0.05). The surgery time for navigated HTO was 11.2 minutes longer than for conventional HTO (55.5 minutes). No specific complications related to the navigation were encountered. At clinical follow up, mean HSS scores of the navigated HTO and conventional groups improved to 91.8 and 92.5 from preoperative values of 55.3 and 55.9, respectively (p>0.05), and all patients achieved full ROM. Navigation for HTO significantly improved the accuracy of postoperative leg axis, and decreased the variability of correction with fewer outliers, and without any complications. Moreover, it allows multi-plane measurements to be made, in the sagittal and transverse planes as well as the frontal plane intra-operatively in real time, compensates to some extent for preoperative planning shortcomings based on radiography, and significantly reduces radiation time

The palpation of the controlateral iliac spinae remains a major hurdle to the success of navigation in lateral position. Several studies are seeking for alternative landmarks to compute the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Up to now, none of those methods have been used in clinical routine. Ultrasound navigation offers a great potential to identify new bony landmarks. The tubercles of the lower lumbar spine and the symphysis can easily be imaged. Those points define a sagittal plane, that can be used as a symmetry plane to compute a virtual controlateral spinae from the acquired colateral spinae. A virtual pelvic plane can then be computed. The objective of this study was to check the accuracy and reproducibility of this virtual anterior pelvic plane. 6 hips (3 left, 3 right) from 4 cadavers (mean BMI 22,6; range 19,5–26,7) embalmed with glycerol and alcohol were used for this study. All anatomic landmarks were acquired with the OrthoPilot® Ultrasound navigation system. One experienced surgeon acquired the reference APP with the cadavers lying supine. The cadavers were then placed in lateral position. Two experienced surgeons acquired 6 times following landmarks: 3 lower lumbar tubercles, 3 sacral tubercles (see Figure 1), the posterior spines, the symphysis and the colateral iliac spine. Several sagittal planes were computed using all points (least square plane) and all possible combinations between one symphysis point, one lower lumbar tubercle point (L5, L4 or L3), and one sacral tubercle point (S2 or S1). The angular error of the resulting virtual APP to the reference APP was computed. For each cadaver, an error map was computed to visualize the error of the virtual APP with respect to the height of the used sacral and lumbar tubercles along the spine. The reference APP was acquired with a good reproducibility: the deviation between each acquisition to the mean of all acquisitions was smaller than 1° (except for cadaver 2 right side, the deviation reached 2 ° in the frontal plane). As some sacral and lumbar points were mixed during the acquisition, the line joining the posterior spines was used to separate the sacral from the lumbar points. The mean errors and standard deviations were comparable between operators. The least square plane computed with all points strongly depended on the cadaver positioning : for the same cadaver, the mean error reached 0°on the left side and 8° on the right side. More constant results were obtained by using a combination of 3 points. 5 outliers were identified and removed as they clearly corresponded to erroneous acquisitions on bad quality images. After having removed those outliers, the mean error ranged between 2° and 5° and the standard deviation between 1° and 3°. The best combination of points was a point on the symphysis, the lowest sacral tubercle (S2) and the lowest lumbar tubercle (L5). This study shows that the symphysis, the lower lumbar and sacral tubercles can be used to define a sagittal plane and thereby define a virtual anterior pelvic plane. Outliers should be suppressed by taking special care to the image quality and by adding a guided ultrasound functionality: visualizing the resulting sagittal plane on the ultrasound picture would enable the surgeon to easily control the accuracy of his acquired plane. The next steps consist in checking the feasibility in a clinical set-up

Aims

Despite the increase in the surgical repair of proximal hamstring tears, there exists a lack of consensus in the optimal timing for surgery. There is also disagreement on how partial tears managed surgically compare with complete tears repaired surgically. This study aims to compare the mid-term functional outcomes in, and operating time required for, complete and partial proximal hamstring avulsions, that are repaired both acutely and chronically.