Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following joint replacement. Antiseptic solutions are often used for intraoperative wound irrigation particularly in cases of revision for PJI. Antiseptic irrigation is intended to eradicate residual bacteria which may be either free floating or in residual biofilm although there is no clear clinical efficacy for its use. Also, reviewing the scientific literature there is discordance in in vitro results where some studies questions antiseptic efficacy whilst others suggest that even at low concentration antiseptic agents are effective at eradicating bacterial biofilms. The aim of this in vitro study was to establish the efficacy of undiluted antiseptic agents at eradication of a typical PJI forming biofilm and determine the importance of an antiseptic neutralisation step in this assessment. Mature Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms grown on TiAl6V4 discs were submerged in chlorohexidine (CHL) gluconate 4%, povidone-iodine (PI) 10% or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control solution. The discs were then rinsed, the biofilm bacteria suspended in solution using sonication and vortexing, and the viable count (CFU/ml) of the bacterial suspensions determined. The rinse/suspension solution was either (a) PBS or (b) Dey-Engley neutralization broth (NB). When PBS was used to rinse/suspend the biofilm a highly significant, 7.5 and 4.1, mean log reduction in biofilm vitality was observed from the control, for CHL 4% and PI 10%, respectively. However, when NB was the rinse/suspension solution the apparent antiseptic biofilm eradication efficacy was replaced with a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant less the one log-reduction in biofilm vitality. Clinical antiseptic agents are ineffective at eradicating S. epidermidis biofilm in an in vitro PJI model and absence of a neutralisation step gives the false impression of efficacy. Antiseptics alone are an ineffective treatment for biofilm related PJI and no substitute for meticulous debridement

Introduction. Hip prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a debilitating complication following joint replacement surgery, with significant impact on patients and healthcare systems. The INFection ORthopaedic Management: Evidence into Practice (INFORM: EP) study, builds upon the 6-year INFORM programme by developing evidence-based guidelines for the identification and management of hip PJI. Methods. A panel of 21 expert stakeholders collaborated to develop best practice guidelines based on evidence from the previous INFORM research programme. An expert consensus process was used to refine guidelines using RAND/UCLA criteria. The guidelines were then implemented over a 12-month period through a Learning Collaborative of 24 healthcare professionals from 12 orthopaedic centres in England. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 members of the collaborative and findings used to inform the development of an implementation support toolkit. Patient and public involvement contextualised the implementation of the guidelines. The study is registered with the ISCRTN (34710385). Result. The INFORM guidelines, structured around the stages of PJI management, were largely supported by surgeons, although barriers included limited awareness among non-surgical team members, lack of job planning for multidisciplinary teams, and challenges in ensuring timely referrals from primary care. Psychological support for patients was identified as a critical gap. Advanced Nurse Practitioners and multidisciplinary team (MDT) coordinators were seen as potential bridges to address these knowledge gaps. The guidelines were also viewed as a useful tool for service development. Conclusions. This study presents the first evidence-based guidelines for hip PJI management, offering a comprehensive approach to prevention, treatment, and postoperative care. Effective implementation is crucial, involving wider dissemination amongst primary and community care, as well as non-specialist treatment centres. Further resources are needed to ensure job planning for MDTs and psychological support for patients. Overall, this study lays the foundation for improved PJI management, benefiting patients and healthcare systems

A hot swollen joint is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice. With a broad range of differentials, septic arthritis (SA) is perhaps one of the most concerning. Treated by culture-specific antibiotics and arthroscopic lavage, some patients require multiple washouts. We aimed to determine:. (1) What are the risk factors for development of SA?. (2) What are the risk factors for repeat washout in SA patients?. (3) What are the important clinical differences between a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and SA cohort?. All patients presenting to the emergency department, orthopaedic, and rheumatology clinics between January 2020 to January 2021 with a hot, swollen joint were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previous trauma on the ipsilateral joint, with data missing from their medical records in any of the variables required for analysis, <24 months follow-up were excluded. Variables of interest in the three-month period preceding the diagnosis of SA were compared between SA and non-SA patients. Factors with a p-value of p<0.100 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. Similar analyses were performed to compare SA patients with multiple washouts with those needing one washout. Demographical and clinical data for PJI patients were collected to delineate important differences with SA cohort. 211 patients were included (SA:28;PJI:24;pseudogout:32;gout:26;others:101). Multivariate analysis showed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), skin infection, and liver disease were risk factors for SA. Amongst patients with septic arthritis, multivariate analysis showed that WBC levels above normal limits (3.6-10.5×109 cells/L) and RA were risk factors for multiple washouts. Between the SA and PJI cohorts, BMI (p=0.002) was significantly lower in the former, whilst WBC level (p=0.023) and CRP (p<0.0001) was significantly higher in the former. Early diagnosis of septic arthritis requires understanding the risk factors, namely RA, skin infection, and liver disease. Considering PJI and septic arthritis as the same entity can lead to wrong clinical judgement, and clinicians should be aware of important differences. We believe that the models in this study are of prognostic value to clinicians who are presented with the common presenting compliant of a hot swollen joint

An increasing elderly population means joint replacement surgery numbers are projected to increase, with associated complications such as periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) also rising. PJI are particularly challenging due to antimicrobial resistant biofilm development on implant surfaces and surrounding tissues, with treatment typically involving invasive surgeries and systemic antibiotic delivery. Consequently, functionalisation of implant surfaces to prevent biofilm formation is a major research focus. This study characterises clinically relevant antimicrobials including gentamicin, clindamycin, daptomycin, vancomycin and caspofungin within a silica-based, biodegradable sol-gel coating for prosthetic devices. Antimicrobial activity of the coatings against clinically relevant microorganisms was assessed via disc diffusion assays, broth microdilution culture methods and the MBEC assay used to determine anti-biofilm activity. Human and bovine cells were cultured in presence of antimicrobial sol-gel to determine cytotoxicity using Alamar blue and antibiotic release was measured by LC-MS. Biodegradability in physiological conditions was assayed by FT-IR, ICP-MS and measuring mass change. Effect of degradation products on osteogenesis were studied by culturing mesenchymal stem cells in the presence of media in which sol-gel samples had been immersed. Antimicrobial-loaded coatings showed strong activity against a wide range of clinically relevant bacterial and fungal pathogens with no loss of activity from antibiotic alone. The sol-gel coating demonstrated controlled release of antimicrobials and initial sol-gel coatings showed no loss of viability on MSCs with gentamicin containing coatings. Current work is underway investigating cytotoxicity of sol-gel compositions against MG-63 cells and primary osteoblasts. This research forms part of an extended study into a promising antimicrobial delivery strategy to prevent PJI. The implant coating has potential to advance PJI infection prevention, reducing future burden upon healthcare costs and patient wellbeing

Despite considerable legacy issues, Girdlestone's Resection Arthroplasty (GRA) remains a valuable tool in the armoury of the arthroplasty surgeon. When reserved for massive lysis in the context of extensive medical comorbidities which preclude staged or significant surgical interventions, and / or the presence of pelvic discontinuity, GRA as a salvage procedure can have satisfactory outcomes. These outcomes include infection control, pain control and post-op function. We describe a case series of 13 cases of GRA and comment of the indications, peri, and post-operative outcomes. We reviewed all cases of GRA performed in our unit during an 8 year period, reviewing the demographics, indications, and information pertaining to previous surgeries, and post op outcome for each. Satisfaction was based on a binary summation (happy/unhappy) of the patients’ sentiments at the post-operative outpatient consultations. 13 cases were reviewed. They had a mean age of 75. The most common indication was PJI, with 10 cases having this indication. The other three cases were performed for avascular necrosis, pelvic osteonecrosis secondary to radiation therapy and end stage arthritis on a background of profound learning disability in a non-ambulatory patient. The average number of previous operations was 5 (1-10). All 13 patients were still alive post girdlestone. 7 (54%) were satisfied, 6 were not. 3 patients were diabetic. 5 patients developed a sinus tract following surgery. With sufficient pre-op patient education, early intensive physiotherapy, and timely orthotic input, we feel this procedure remains an important and underrated and even compassionate option in the context of massive lysis and / or the presence of pelvic discontinuity / refractory PJI. GRA should be considered not a marker of failure but as a definitive procedure that gives predictability to patients and surgeon in challenging situations

Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur after total joint replacement surgery. With increasing antimicrobial resistance, there is a need for non-antibiotic approaches to treat and prevent PJI. Doping calcium phosphates with antimicrobial ions shows promise for these purposes. This systematic review aims to search and summarise the evidence-base for the potential of calcium phosphates doped with different antimicrobial ions. A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web-Of-Science, Cochrane Library and Emcare of in vitro and animal studies on the antimicrobial activity of (co)substituted calcium phosphates according to PRIMSA guidelines.. The research protocol, listing search terms and in/exclusion criteria, was registered a priori at . https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HEP18U. Data was extracted regarding ions, micro-organisms and antimicrobial activity. The search retrieved 1017 hits of which 148 papers were included. The substitution of 33 different ions was reported. Silver (n= 46), zinc (n=39), copper (n=18) and magnesium (n=14) were the most commonly doped ions. 36 different micro-organisms were studied of which E. coli (n=109), S. aureus (n=99), and C. albicans (n=22) were the most common. 6 different outcomes were reported, most commonly the K-ratio (n=53), the log CFU (n=41) and the bacterial inhibition zone (n=39). A validated outcome for the evaluation of biofilm prevention was lacking. There was considerable heterogeneity in studied ions, micro-organisms and reported outcomes. A lack of clearly defined reporting guidelines in the field of antimicrobial materials has led to the use of clinically irrelevant micro-organisms and a general lack of consistency of the methods used and the reported results. Currently, there is no universally accepted measure for the effectiveness required from biomaterials for treatment and prevention of PJI

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an important cause of arthroplasty failure. There is no method to disclose the presence or map the distribution of the in vivo biofilm on infected arthroplasty despite the recognition that such a tool would aid intraoperative decision making and improve novel implant design. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of four dyes to disclose bacterial biofilm in an in vitro setting. Four dyes with known affinity to bacterial biofilm were assessed to determine their efficacy to disclose biofilms in an in vitro model of PJI. Three dyes (Methylene Blue, Indocyanine Green and Rose Bengal) have established clinical utility and the other, Thioflavin T, is known to fluoresce in the presence of amyloid a known biofilm constituent. The efficacy of the dyes to discriminate between biofilms of different mass and vitality (high, low or the non-inoculated control) was determined after three minutes exposure of the biofilm to the dyes by calculating the amount of dye bound to the biofilm via sonication and spectrophotometry, quantification of the dye through standardised photographic imaging of the stained biofilm and the calculation of inter-observer agreement. Each experiment was performed in triplicate for each dye and repeated three times. For each of the disclosure dyes assessed there was significant difference demonstrated between the amount of dye bound to the high and low mass biofilms (p<0.05) as well as in the amount of dye quantified in photographic and fluorescent image assessment between biofilms of differing mass (p<0.01). There was excellent agreement between three observers, for each disclosure dye, in determining the biofilm mass of each stained disc (Kappa>0.91). This study demonstrates the efficacy of biofilm disclosure dyes in an in vitro PJI model which could one day be used to disclose and map the clinical biofilm in vivo

The implantation of endoprosthesis is a routine procedure in orthopaedics. Endoprosthesis are mainly manufactured from ceramics, polymers, metals or metal alloys. To ensure longevity of the implants they should be as biocompatible as possible and ideally have antibacterial properties, to avoid periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Various antibacterial implant materials have been proposed, but have so far only been used sporadically in patients. PJI is one of the main risk factors for revision surgeries. The aim of the study was to identify novel implant coatings that both exhibit antibacterial properties whilst having optimal biocompatibility. Six different novel implant coatings and surface modifications (EBM TiAl6V4, strontium, TiCuN, TiNbN, gentamicin phosphate (GP), gentamicin phosphate+cationic polymer (GP+CP)) were compared to standard CoCrMo-alloy. The coatings were further characterized with regard to the surface roughness. E. coli and S. capitis were cultured on the modified surfaces to investigate the antibacterial properties. To quantify bacterial proliferation the optical density (OD) was measured and viability was determined using colony forming units (CFU). Murine bone marrow derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured on the surfaces and differentiated into osteoblasts to quantify the mineralisation using the alizarin red assay. All novel coatings showed reduced bacterial proliferation and viability compared to standard CoCrMo-alloy. A significant reduction was observed for GP and GP+CP coated samples compared to CoCrMo (OD. GP,E.coli. = 0.18±0.4; OD. GP+CP,E.coli. = 0.13±0.3; p≤0.0002; N≥7-8). An increase in osteoblast-mediated mineralisation was observed on all surfaces tested compared to CoCrMo. Furthermore, GP and GP+CP coated samples showed a statistically significant increase (M. GP. = 0.21±0.1; M. GP+CP. = 0.25±0.2; p<0.0001; N≥3-6). The preliminary data indicates that the gentamicin containing surfaces have the most effective antibacterial property and the highest osseointegrative capacity. The use of antibiotic coatings on prostheses could reduce the risk of PJI while being applied on osseointegrative implant surfaces

Objectives. The objective of this study was to develop a test for the rapid (within 25 minutes) intraoperative detection of bacteria from synovial fluid to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods. The 16s rDNA test combines a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for amplification of 16s rDNA with a lateral flow immunoassay in one fully automated system. The synovial fluid of 77 patients undergoing joint aspiration or primary or revision total hip or knee surgery was prospectively collected. The cohort was divided into a proof-of-principle cohort (n = 17) and a validation cohort (n = 60). Using the proof-of-principle cohort, an optimal cut-off for the discrimination between PJI and non-PJI samples was determined. PJI was defined as detection of the same bacterial species in a minimum of two microbiological samples, positive histology, and presence of a sinus tract or intra-articular pus. Results. The 16s rDNA test proved to be very robust and was able to provide a result in 97% of all samples within 25 minutes. The 16s rDNA test was able to diagnose PJI with a sensitivity of 87.5% and 82%, and a specificity of 100% and 89%, in the proof-of-principle and validation cohorts, respectively. The microbiological culture of synovial fluid achieved a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 93% in the validation cohort. Conclusion. The 16s rDNA test offers reliable intraoperative detection of all bacterial species within 25 minutes with a sensitivity and specificity comparable with those of conventional microbiological culture of synovial fluid for the detection of PJI. The 16s rDNA test performance is independent of possible blood contamination, culture time and bacterial species. Cite this article: V. Janz, J. Schoon, C. Morgenstern, B. Preininger, S. Reinke, G. Duda, A. Breitbach, C. F. Perka, S. Geissler. Rapid detection of periprosthetic joint infection using a combination of 16s rDNA polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow immunoassay: A Pilot Study. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:12–19. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0103.R2

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is associated with a higher risk of revision compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The outcomes of knee arthroplasty are typically presented as implant survival or incidence of revision after a set number of years, which can be difficult for patients and clinicians to conceptualise. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more relatable estimate of risk projection over a patient's remaining lifetime, and make comparisons to TKA. All primary UKAS performed from 1999 to 2019 (n=13,481) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were included. The lifetime risk of revision was calculated and stratified by age, gender and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. The lifetime risk of revision for UKA was highest in the youngest patients (46-50 years; 40.4%) and lowest in the oldest patients (86-90 years; 3.7%). Lifetime risk of revision was higher for females (range 4.3%-43.4% cf. males 2.9%-37.4%) and patients with higher ASA status (ASA 3-4 range 8.8%-41.2% cf. ASA 1 1.8%-29.8%), regardless of age. The lifetime risk of UKA was two-fold higher than TKA (ranging from 3.7%-40.4% UKA, 1.6%-22.4% TKA) across all age groups. Increased risk of revision in the younger patients was associated with aseptic loosening in both males and females, and pain in females. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) accounted for 4% of all UKA revisions, in contrast to 27% for TKA; risk of PJI was higher for males than females for both procedures. The lifetime risk of revision is a more meaningful measure of arthroplasty outcomes and can aid with patient counselling prior to UKA. Findings from this study show the increased lifetime risk of UKA revision for younger patients, females and those with higher ASA status

The efficacy of saline irrigation for the treatment of periprosthetic infection (PJI) is limited in the presence of infected implants. This study evaluated the efficacy of vancomycin/tobramycin-doped polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/ceramic composites (PVA-VAN/TOB-P) after saline irrigation in a mouse pouch infection model. 3D printed porous titanium (Ti) cylinders (400, 700 and 100 µm in pore size) were implanted into mice pouches, then inoculated with S. aureus at the amounts of 1X10. 3. CFU and 1X10. 6. CFU per pouch, respectively. Mice were randomized into 4 groups (n=6 for each group): (1) no bacteria; (2) bacteria without saline wash; 3) saline wash only, and (4) saline wash+PVA-VAN/TOB-P. After seven days, pouches were washed out alone or with additional injection of 0.2 ml of PVA-VAN/TOB-P. Mice were sacrificed 14 days after pouch wash. Bacteria cultures of collected Ti cylinders and washout fluid and histology of pouch tissues were performed. The low-grade infection (1X10. 3. CFU) was more significant in 400 µm Ti cylinders than that in Ti cylinders with larger pore sizes (700 and 1000 µm (p<0.05). A similar pattern of high-grade infection (1X10. 6. CFU) was observed (p<0.05). For the end wash, the bacteria burden (0.49±0.02) in saline wash group was completely eradicated by the addition of PVA-VAN/TOB-P (0.005±0.001, p<0.05). We noticed that 400 µm Ti cylinders have the highest risk of implant infection. Our data supported that the effect of saline irrigation was very limited in the presence of contaminated porous Ti cylinders. PVA-VAN/TOB-P was biodegradable, biocompatible, and was effective in eradicating bacteria retention after saline irrigation in a mouse model of low grade and high-grade infection. We believe that PVA-VAN/TOB-P represents an alternative to reduce the risk of PJI by providing a sustained local delivery of antibiotics

Failure of osseointegration and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are the two main reasons of implant failure after total joint replacement (TJR). Nanofiber (NF) implant surface coating represents an alternative local drug eluting device that improves osseointegration and decreases the risk of PJI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacies of erythromycin (EM)-loaded coaxial PLGA/PCL-PVA NF coating in a rat S. aureus-infected tibia model. NF coatings with 100mg and 1000mg EM were prepared. NF without EM was included as positive control. 56 Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups. A titanium pin (1.0-mm x 8 mm) was placed into the tibia through the intercondylar notch. S. aureus (SA) was introduced by both direct injection of 10 μl broth (1 × 10. 4. CFU) into the medullary cavity and single dip of Ti pins into a similar solution prior to insertion. Rats were sacrificed at 8 and 16 weeks after surgery. The outcome measurements include μCT based quantitative osteolysis evaluation and hard tissue histology. Results: EM-NF coating (EM100 and EM1000) reduced osteolysis at 8 and 16 weeks, compared to EM0 and negative control. The effective infection control by EM-NFs was further confirmed by hard tissue section analysis. The Bone implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction Occupancy (BAFO) within 200 µm of the surface of the pins were used to evaluate the osseointegration and new bone formation around the implants. At 16 weeks, the bone implant contact (BIC) of EM 100 (35.08%) was higher than that of negative control (3.43%) and EM0 (0%). The bone area fraction occupancy within 200 µm (BAFO) of EM100 (0.63 mm2) was higher than that of negative control (0.390 mm2) and EM0 (0.0 mm. 2. ). The BAFO of EM100 was also higher than that of EM1000 (0.3mm. 2. ). There was much less osteolysis observed with EM100 and EM1000 NF coatings at 16 weeks, as compared to EM0 positive control, p=0.08 and p=0.1, respectively. Osseointegration and periprosthetic bone formation was enhanced by EM-NFs, especially EM100. Data from this pilot study is promising for improving implant surface fabrication strategies

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip replacement. Over 1,000 operations are performed annually in the United Kingdom for PJI following hip replacement, using either one- or two-stage revision arthroplasty. It is unclear which is preferred by patients and which has the best long-term outcome. This qualitative study aims to describe patient experiences of treatment and recovery following one- and two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI within the context of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing these two approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients undergoing one- or two-stage revision treatment for PJI as part of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were recruited from 12 participating National Health Service (NHS) Orthopaedic Departments and were interviewed 2–4 months after their first revision surgery and again approximately 18 months later. Final sample size was justified on the basis of thematic saturation. All patients consented to the interview being audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Ethical approval was provided by NRES Committee South-West Frenchay, 14/SW/116. Patients in both the one- and two-stage treatment groups described prolonged hospital stays, with burdensome antibiotics and brief physiotherapy treatment. However, following discharge home and during recovery, participants undergoing two-stage revision with an ‘empty hip' or with a spacer reported being physically restricted in almost every aspect of their daily life, resulting in inactivity and confinement to home. Mobility aids were not sufficiently available through the health service for these patients. A key difference is that those with a spacer reported more pain than those without. Approximately one year following their second-stage revision, participants described being more independent and active, but two directly attributed muscle weakness to the lengthy period without a hip and described resulting falls or dislocations that had complicated their recovery. In contrast, those undergoing one-stage revision and CUMARS appeared to be more alike, reporting better mobility, functionality and independence, although still limited. Participants in these groups also reported minimal or no pain following their revision. A key difference between CUMARS and one-stage revision was the uncertainty of whether a second operation was necessary, which participants described as “hanging over them”, while those in the two-stage empty hip or spacer group described a more positive anticipation of a second definitive operation as it marked an end to what was described as a detachment from life. Our findings highlight the differences between patient experiences of recovery following revision arthroplasty, and how this is influenced by the surgical approach and presence or lack of spacers. An understanding of lived experiences following one- and two-stage surgical interventions will complement knowledge about the clinical effectiveness of these different types of revision surgery

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are uncommon but are devastating complications of total knee replacement (TKR). We analysed the risk factors of revision for PJI following primary TKR and their association with PJI at different post-operative periods. Primary TKRs and subsequent revision surgeries performed for PJI from 2003–2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Multilevel piece-wise exponential non-proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of the investigated factors at different post-operative periods. Patient, perioperative and healthcare system characteristics were investigated and data from the Hospital Episode Statistics for England were linked to obtain information on specific comorbidities. The index TKRs consisted of 679,010 primaries with 3,659 subsequently revised for PJI, 7% within 3 months, 6% between 3–6months, 17% between 6–12months, 27% between 1–2years and 43% ≥2 years from the index procedure. Risk factors for revision for PJI included male sex, high BMI, high ASA grade and young age. Patients with chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes and liver disease had higher risk of revision for PJI, as had patients who had a primary TKR for an indication of trauma or inflammatory arthropathy. Surgical procedure, fixation method, constraint and bearing type influenced the risk of revision for PJI. Their effects were period-specific. No or small associations were found with the operating surgeon grade, surgical volume and hospital surgical volume. These findings from the world's largest joint replacement registry show a more complex picture than the meta-analyses published to date with specific time-dependent effects for the identified risk factors

Patients with knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) frequently receive one- or two-stage revision. To explore the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing methods, we analysed a UK registry, interviewed patients and surgeons, systematically reviewed literature, held a consensus meeting, and assessed progress of an RCT in hip PJI. In 2014, in England and Wales, knee PJI was treated with one- or two-stage procedures in 19% and 71% of patients respectively. Between 2007 and 2014, use of one-stage procedures doubled and, in major centres, up to 42% of treatments were one-stage. We conducted in-depth interviews with 16 patients with knee PJI and 11 surgeons performing one- or two-stage revision. Patients considered randomisation acceptable with appropriate counselling and, depending on infecting organisms and health status, surgeons would randomise treatments. In meta-analysis, two-year re-infection rates in 10 one-stage series (423 patients) and 108 two-stage series (5,129 patients) were 7.6% (95%CI 3.4,13.1) and 8.8% (7.2,10.6) respectively. In a series of patients with knee PJI, surgeons from 2 major centres considered 6/15 patients eligible for either treatment, with 4 more potentially eligible after treatment of soft tissue infection. In an ongoing RCT of surgical treatment of hip PJI, 116 patients have been randomised at 14 centres in 3 years. Randomising patients with PJI is feasible but, as knee PJI is uncommon, a multicentre RCT would be required. Based on WOMAC score outcome and appropriate assumptions on eligibility and acceptability, 170 patients would need to be randomised over 4 years at 14 major centres

Introduction. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip replacement. A recent systematic review of patient risk factors for PJI identified male gender, smoking status, increasing BMI, steroid use, previous joint surgery and comorbidities of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and depression as risk factors for developing PJI. Limitations of the current literature include the short term follow up of most published studies. We investigated the role of patient, surgical and healthcare factors on the risk of revision of a primary hip replacement for PJI at different time-points in the post-operative follow-up. It is important that those risk factors are identified so that patients can be appropriately counselled according to their individual risk profile prior to surgery and modifiable factors can be addressed to reduce the risk of PJI at an individual and healthcare system level. Materials and Methods. Primary hip replacements and subsequent revision procedures performed for PJI from 2003–2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Patient (age, gender, ASA grade, BMI), perioperative (surgical indication, type of anaesthesia, thromboprophylaxis regime, surgical approach, hip replacement and bearing surface and use of femoral or acetabular bone graft) and healthcare system characteristics (surgeon grade, surgical volume) were linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics to obtain information on specific ethnicity and comorbidities (derived from the Charlson index). Multilevel piecewise exponential non-proportional hazards models were used to estimate their effects at different post-operative periods (0–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 and >24 months post-operation). Results. The index hip replacements consisted of 623,253 primaries with 2,705 subsequently revised for PJI, 14% within 3 months, 8% between 3–6 months, 14% between 6–12 months, 22% between 1–2 years and 42% ≥2 years after the index procedure. Risk factors for revision of PJI included male gender, high BMI, high ASA grade and younger age. Their effects were period-specific. Patients with chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes or dementia had high early risk of revision for PJI, as did patients operated for a fractured neck of femur (<3 months). Metal-on-metal bearings (>12 months) and lateral surgical approach (≥3 months) also influenced the mid- and long-term revision risk for PJI. No or modest associations were found with the operating surgeon grade, surgical volume and hospital surgical volume. Conclusion. The effects of patient, perioperative and healthcare system risk factors for PJI after primary hip replacement are time-dependent. Modifiable risk factors such as the type of surgical approach and bearing surface have also been found

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are increasing in prevalence and are recognised as one of the most common modes of failure of joint replacements. Osteomyelitis arising from PJI is challenging to treat, difficult to cure and increases patient mortality 5-fold. PJI can have subtle symptoms and lie dormant or go undiagnosed for many years, suggesting persistent bacterial infection. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen causing PJI. Osteocytes are the most numerous and long-lived cell type in hard bone tissue. Our recent work has shown that S. aureus can infect and reside in human osteocytes without causing cell death, both experimentally and in bone samples from patients with PJI. Osteocytes respond to infection by the differential regulation of a large number of genes, suggesting previously unknown immune functions of this important cell type. S. aureus adapts during intracellular infection of osteocytes by adopting a quasi-dormant, small colony variant (SCV) phenotype, a property of several bacterial species known to cause PJI, which could contribute to persistent or silent infection. These findings shed new light on the aetiology of PJI and osteomyelitis in general. Further elucidation of the role of osteocytes in bone infection will hopefully lead to improved disease detection and management

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip and knee replacement. We investigated the rates of revision surgery for the treatment of PJI following primary and revision hip and knee replacement, explored time trends, and estimated the overall surgical burden created by PJI. We analysed the National Joint Registry for England and Wales for revision hip and knee replacements performed for a diagnosis of PJI and their index procedures from 2003–2014. The index hip replacements consisted of 623,253 primary and 63,222 aseptic revision hip replacements with 7,642 revisions subsequently performed for PJI; for knee replacements the figures were 679,010 primary and 33,920 aseptic revision knee replacements with 8,031 revisions subsequently performed for PJI. Cumulative incidence functions, prevalence rates and the burden of PJI in terms of total procedures performed as a result of PJI were calculated. Revision rates for PJI equated to 43 out of every 10,000 primary hip replacements (2,705/623,253), i.e. 0.43%(95%CI 0.42–0.45), subsequently being revised due to PJI. Around 158 out of every 10,000 aseptic revision hip replacements performed were subsequently revised for PJI (997/63,222), i.e. 1.58%(1.48–1.67). For knees, the respective rates were 0.54%(0.52–0.56) for primary replacements, i.e. 54 out of every 10,000 primary replacements performed (3,659/679,010) and 2.11%(1.96–2.23) for aseptic revision replacements, i.e. 211 out of every 10,000 aseptic revision replacements performed (717/33,920). Between 2005 and 2013, the risk of revision for PJI in the 3 months following primary hip replacement rose by 2.29 fold (1.28–4.08) and after aseptic revision by 3.00 fold (1.06–8.51); for knees, it rose by 2.46 fold (1.15–5.25) after primary replacement and 7.47 fold (1.00–56.12) after aseptic revision. The rates of revision for PJI performed at any time beyond 3 months from the index surgery remained stable or decreased over time. From a patient perspective, after accounting for the competing risk of revision for an aseptic indication and death, the 10-year cumulative incidence of revision hip replacement for PJI was 0.62%(95%CI 0.59–0.65) following primary and 2.25%(2.08–2.43) following aseptic revision; for knees, the figures were 0.75%(0.72–0.78) following primary replacement and 3.13%(2.81–3.49) following aseptic revision. At a health service level, the absolute number of procedures performed as a consequence of hip PJI increased from 387 in 2005 to 1,013 in 2014, i.e. a relative increase of 2.6 fold. While 70% of those revisions were two-stage, the use of single stage revision increased from 17.6% in 2005 to 38.5% in 2014. For knees, the burden of PJI increased by 2.8 fold between 2005 and 2014. Overall, 74% of revisions were two-stage with an increase in use of single stage from 10.0% in 2005 to 29.0% in 2014. Although the risk of revision due to PJI following hip or knee replacement is low, it is rising. Given the burden and costs associated with performing revision joint replacement for prosthetic joint infection and the predicted increased incidence of both primary and revision hip replacement, this has substantial implications for service delivery

Administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) reduces the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. The optimal type of antibiotic used, and duration of prophylaxis are subject to debate. We compared the risk of revision surgery for PJI in the first year following THA and TKA by AP regimen. A national survey collecting information on hospital-level AP regimen policy was conducted across the Netherlands and linked to data from the LROI arthroplasty registry for 2011–2015. PJI status was defined using the surgical indication reported at revision by surgeons in the registry form. Restricted cubic splines Poisson model adjusted for hospital clustering were used to conduct the comparisons on 130,712 THAs and 111,467 TKAs performed across 99 institutions. These included 399 THAs and 303 TKAs revised for an indication of PJI. Multiple shot of Cefazolin (MCZ), of cefuroxime (MCX) and single shot of Cefazolin (SCZ) were respectively administrated to 87%, 4% and 9% of patients. For THA, the rates of revision for PJI were respectively 31/10,000 person-years 95%CI[28, 35], 39[25, 59] and 23[15, 34] in the groups which received MCZ, MCX and SCZ; respectively, the rates for TKA were 27[24, 31], 40[24, 62] and 24[16, 36]. No evidence of difference between AP regimens was found in the unadjusted and adjusted model (age, gender, BMI and ASA grade). Further work is advocated to confirm whether there is an association between AP regimen collected at patient-level and the risk of subsequent revision for PJI

The most common reasons for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) failure are aseptic loosening (AL) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is a big clinical challenge to identify the patients with high risk of AL/PJI before the TJA surgery. Although there is evidence that genetic factors contribute to the individual susceptibility to AL/PJI, a predictive model for identification of patients with a high genetic risk of TJA failure has not been developed yet. We aimed to develop a risk evaluation tool utilising the AL/PJI-associated polymorphisms for identification of patients with high genetic risk of TJA failure based on inflammation-gene polymorphism panel. Based on allele and genotype frequencies of twenty-five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TNF, IL2, IL6, IL10, IL1b, IL-1Ra, MBL2, MMP1, FTO genes and those influencing the serum levels of biomarkers of TJA outcomes (IL6, CCL2/MCP-1, CRP, ESR) in peripheral blood obtained from patients with TJA (AL, n=110; PJI, n=93; no complications, n=123), we calculated a hazard ratio and a relative entropy of alleles and genotypes associated with AL and PJI and their combinations in patient subgroups. We conducted a risk evaluation tool based on the presence of risk alleles and genotypes in TNF (rs361525, rs1800629), DARC (rs12075), MBL2 (rs11003125) and FTO (rs9939609, rs9930506) genes associated with implant failure (AL/PJI). Of these, FTO gene variations (rs9939609, rs9930506) were associated mainly with PJI (P=0.001, OR=2.04, 95%CI=1.132–2.603; P=0.011, OR=1.72, 95%CI=1.338–3.096) and DARC (rs12075) with AL (P=0.005, OR=1.79, 95%CI=1.193–2.696). This tool calculates a hazard ratio of a combination of SNPs associated with AL and PJI for identification of patients with high and low risk of AL/PJI TJA failure. We proposed a risk evaluation tool for stratification of patients before the TJA surgery based on the genetic risk of AL/PJI development. The effect size for each genotype combination described in the study is small. Further multiparametric data analysis and studies on an extended patient cohort and other non-genetic and genetic parameters are ongoing. Grant support: AZV MZ CR VES16-131852A, VES15-27726A, IGA LF UP_2016_011