Introduction & aims. Resurfacing of the patella is an important part of most TKA operations, usually using an onlay technique. One common practice is to medialise the patellar button and aim to recreate the patellar offset, but most systems do not well control alignment of the patella button. This study aimed to investigate for relationships between placement and outcomes and report on the accuracy of patella placement achieved with the aid of a patella Patient Specific Guide (PSG). Method. A databse of TKR patients operated on by five surgeons from 1-Jan-2014 who had a pre-operative and post-operative CT scan and 6-month postoperative Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome (KOOS) scores were assessed. Knees were excluded if the patella was unresurfaced or an inlay technique was used. All knee operations were performed with the Omni Apex implant range and used dome patella buttons. A sample of 40 TKRs had a patella PSG produced consisting of a replication of an inlay barrel shaped to fit flush to the patient's patella bone. The centre of the quadriceps tendon on the superior pole of the patella bone and the patella tendon on the inferior were landmarked. 3D implant and bone models from the preoperative CT scans were registered to the post-operative CT scan. The flat plane of the implanted patella button was determined and the position of the button relative to the tendon attachments calculated. Coverage of the bone by the button and patellar offset reconstruction were also calculated. The sample of 40 TKRs for whom a patella PSG was produced had their variation in placement assessed relative to the wider population sample. All surgeries were conducted with Omni Apex implants using a domed patella. Results. A total of 322 patients were identified in the database, and 82 were subsequently excluded as inlay rather than onlay patella. 59% (142) were female and the average age was 68.9 years (+/− 7.2). Coverage percentage of the cut patella surface by the button was 67% (± 7%), with 83% (200) knees having greater than 60%, and 40% (96) greater than 70%. Component position was on average centralised in terms of mediolateral position (0.09mm ± 1.93 lateral). When comparing the alignment of the patients whose knees used PSG guides with those who did not, it was found there was a statistically significant reduction in the variation that both external rotation error and flexional error had (p-values 0.048 and 0.022 respectively.). Excess medialisation of the patella button was found to weakly correlate with reduced postoperative KOOS symptoms scores (coefficient=0.14, p-value = 0.035). When subdivided into patients who reported knee clicking sometimes or more often and those who did not, patients with highly medialised buttons had a 1.5× likelihood of reporting clicking of their knee joint (p-value = 0.036). Conclusions. The patella-femoral joint remains a crucial component in the TKA knee, but the process of resurfacing the bone is not well controlled and can negatively influence patient outcomes. PSG's are one potential mechanism of controlling patella component alignment

Introduction. The degree of cartilage degeneration assessed intraoperatively may not be sufficient as a criterion for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for detecting osteoarthritic involvement deeper in the subchondral bone. The purpose of the study was to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath the patella in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and whether clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing differed according to the severity of patellofemoral (PF) OA determined by visual assessment and SPECT/CT findings. Methods. This study included 206 knees which underwent TKA. The degree of cartilage degeneration was graded intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Subjects were classified into four groups according to the degree of bone tracer uptake (BTU) on SPECT/CT in the PF joint. The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed preoperatively and postoperative 1 and 2 years. Results. The increased BTU in the PF joint was associated with more severe degenerative cartilage changes underneath the patella (P < 0.001). The risk for the presence of denudated cartilage was greater in the high uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89). There was no association between clinical outcomes and visual grading of patellar cartilage degeneration or the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT. Discussion and Conclusions. The visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation of the PF joint were not predictive of clinical outcome after TKA with unresurfaced patella

Patello-femoral arthritis can result in a considerable thinning of the patella. The restoration of an adequate patella thickness is key to the successful outcome of knee arthroplasty. The objectives were (1) to establish a reproducible patella width:thickness index including chondral surface and (2) to investigate whether there is a difference between bone alone and bone/chondral construct thickness as shown by MRI. Forty three MRI scans of young adults, mean age 27 (range 17–38), 34 male and 9 female, were studied. Exclusion criteria included degenerative joint disease, patello-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (102 patients). The bony and chondral thickness of the patella and its width were measured. Inter/intra observer variability was calculated and correlation analysis performed. We found a strong correlation between patella plus cartilage thickness and width (Pearson 0.75, P < 0.001). The mean width:thickness ratio was 1.8 (SD 0.10, 95% CI 1.77–1.83). Without cartilage the ratio was 2.16 (SD 0.15, 95% CI 2.11–2.21), correlation was moderate (Pearson 0.68, P < 0.001). The average patella cartilage thickness was 4.1mm (SD 1.1, 95% CI 3.8–4.5). The narrow confidence intervals for the ratio of patella width:thickness suggest that patella width can be used as a guide to accurate restoration of patella thickness during total knee or patella-femoral replacement. We would recommend a ratio of 1.8:1

Introduction. The trochlea of a typical patellofemoral replacement or anterior flange of a total knee replacement usually extends past the natural trochlea and continues onto the femoral anterior cortex. One reason for this is that it allows a simple patella button to be permanently engaged in the trochlea groove in an attempt to ensure stability. On the natural patella, the apex helps to guide it into the trochlea groove as the knee moves from full extension into flexion. The aim is to study whether a generalised patella can be created that is close in form to a healthy patella. Method. MRI scans were taken of 30 patellae. Characteristics of these patellae (height, width, thickness, apex angle) were measured. The apex angle was found to be similar between patellae (mean=126 degrees, sd = 8.8), as were the ratios between height and width (mean width/height = 1.05, sd = 0.07) and between thickness and width (mean width/thickness = 1.8, sd = 0.19). These patellae were then segmented to create a surface including cartilage, resulting in 30 STL (stereolithography) files in which the surfaces are represented by triangle meshes. To design the average patella the individual patellae were aligned to a standard frame of reference by placing a set of landmarks on the proximal/distal, medial/lateral and anterior/posterior extents of each (fig.1). The vertical axis was defined as passing parallel to the proximal/distal points and the horizontal as passing parallel to the medial/lateral points when looking along the computed vertical axis. The origin centre of the frame of reference was chosen to be mid-way between these points. The mean width was then computed and each patella scaled linearly around the origin to give them all equal width. All the aligned patellae were then averaged together to provide a composite cartilaginous patella. The averaging process was achieved by taking one patella as a seed. The patella chosen for seed was that whose parameters were closest to the average width, height and thickness. An approximately normal vector was passed a point ‘P’ on the seeds, and the points at which these intersected the other models were then determined. The closest intersection point to ‘P’ on each model was chosen and these averaged together. ‘P’ is then replaced in the model with this average point. The averaging process then continues with all the remaining points on the seed model in the same manner to build the average models. Results and Discussion. The mean patella was compared with individual patellae. This comparison was performed by taking each point on the mean patella and finding the closest point on individual patellae - a colour coded map of differences was obtained (fig.2) along with a mean of the absolute difference for each patella. The absolute mean difference ranged from 0.56mm to 1.33mm, averaging at 0.85mm. This shows a reasonable fit between the average patella and each individual example, raising the possibility of using the average shape in future research to develop anatomical patellofemoral replacements and for planning patella resurfacing

Introduction. Patella femoral joint bearings in total knee replacements have shown low wear (3.1 mm. 3. /MC) under standard gait simulator conditions. 1. However, the wear in retrieval studies have shown large variations between 1.3 to 45.2 mm. 3. /year. 2. Previous in vitro studies on the tibial femoral joint have shown wear is dependent on design, materials and kinematics. 3. . The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design (geometry) and shape on the wear rate of patella femoral joints in total knee replacements. Materials and Methods. The Leeds/Prosim knee simulator was used to investigate the wear of two types of commercially available patellae. The PFC Sigma cobalt chrome femoral component was coupled with 2 types of patellae buttons: round and oval dome. The UHMWPE was the same for the both types – GUR1020 GVF (gamma irradiated in vacuum and foiled packed). 25% bovine serum was used as the lubricant. The test were carried out at three conditions – high medial lateral (ML) rotations (<4°) and uncontrolled ML displacement (<4 mm), low ML rotation (<1°) and uncontrolled ML displacement (<4 mm); the physiological gait cycle; and low ML rotation and controlled ML displacement (<1.5 mm). In this abstract the two designs were tested in physiological gait condition (Figure 1). Patella ML displacement and tilt were passively controlled and measured after every 300,000 cycles. A ligament resisting force equivalent to 10 N4 was applied on the lateral side of the patella to avoid patella slip. Five samples of each design were tested for 3 million cycles at a cycle rate of 1 Hz. The wear volume was obtained gravimetrically every million cycles and presented with 95% confidence limits. Statistical significance was taken at p<0.05. Results and Discussions. The wear rate of PFC sigma round dome patella was higher (8.63 ± 3.44 mm. 3. /million cycles) compared to the PFC sigma oval dome patella (6.28 ± 3.89 mm. 3. /million cycles) (Figure 2). However, no significant difference in the wear rates was found between the two shapes (P=0.2). The low area of contact of oval dome patella (31.2% of total surface area) as compared to round dome patella (39.9%) led to low wear. 5. . The wear volume and the patellar tilt were positively correlated for oval dome and round dome patella, R. 2. > 0.9 (Figure 3). Increase in the patellar tilt resulted increase in sliding distance in perpendicular direction of polymer orientation. This led to higher wear volume. Conclusions. Wear rate decreased with change of patella shape from round dome to oval dome although not significantly. Increase in the patellar tilt resulted in increase in the wear volume. Acknowledgement. This research was supported in part by the DePuy and EPSRC. In addition, it was partially funded through WELMEC, a Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust, under grant number WT 088908/Z/09/Z and additionally supported by the NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) as part of collaboration with the LMBRU (Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit)

Patella instability is a common problem with many surgical options. We prospectively evaluated the results of medial patella femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with an autogenous gracilis or semitendinous graft. With a minimum follow up of one year patients were reviewed using the Kujala scoring system. Twenty MPFL reconstructions were performed on seventeen patients over a two year period, from January 2004 to December 2005. There were 13 females and 4 males. Three patients had bilateral involvement. Thirteen patients had a lateral release with their MPFL reconstruction and three had a distal realignment procedure as well to correct their patella instability. The mean follow up was 17 months (range 12 to 26 months). The average age was 25 years old at operation (range 13 to 47) and the average age of their first dislocation was 16 (range 0-35). Nine patients had previous surgical treatment for patella instability. The average hypermobility score in the patients was 5/9 and six patients scored 9/9. At follow up 18 out of 20 patients (90%) had stable tracking with no further subluxations/dislocations. Of the two with unstable tracking, one had a stable patella before falling several times onto her knee. An MRI confirmed the ligament was intact but a type 2 trochlear dysplasia was present and a Bereiter trochleoplasty was subsequently performed. The other patient described no frank dislocation but instead subluxations. Eighteen of the twenty reconstructions (90%) achieved a stable patella. Overall Kujala scores increased by a third

Aim. To assess if there is a reproducible relationship between the width and thickness of the normal patella. Method. 43 MRI scans of young adults, average age 27 (range 17–38) were studied. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of degenerative joint disease, patella-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (102 patients). The bony thickness of the patella, the chondral thickness and patella width were measured, as was the location of maximal patella thickness. Inter/intra observer variability was calculated and correlation analysis performed. Results. There was a strong correlation between overall patella thickness (bone plus cartilage) and width (Pearson 0.75, P < 0.001). The width: thickness ratio is 1.8:1 (standard deviation 0.102, 95% confidence interval 1.6–2.0). The average patella cartilage thickness is 4.1mm (SD 1.3). The thickest region of the patella lies 54% (SD 2.32) from the lateral border and 54% (SD 7.9) from the superior pole. Conclusion. We propose that the normal “Index of Patella Width: Thickness” = 1.8:1. It can be used as a guide for restoring patella thickness during TKR or patella-femoral replacement to that of a knee free from age related wear and osteoarthritis. This maximal thickness should be slightly medial and distal in the patella. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

“The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.” This explains many cases of patellar maltracking, when the patellar track is visualised in three dimensions. The three-dimensional view means that rotation of the tibia and femur during flexion and extension, as well as rotational positioning of the tibial and femoral components are extremely important. As the extensor is loaded, the patella tends to “center” itself between the patellar tendon and the quadriceps muscle. The patella is most likely to track in the trochlear groove IF THE GROOVE is situated where the patella is driven by the extensor mechanism: along the shortest track from origin to insertion. Attempts to constrain the patella in the trochlear groove, if it lies outside that track, are usually unsuccessful. Physiologic mechanisms for tibial-femoral rotation that benefit patellar tracking (“screw home” and “asymmetric femoral roll-back”) are not generally reproduced. Practical Point. A patellofemoral radiograph that shows the tibial tubercle, illustrates how the tubercle, and with it the patellar tendon and patella itself, are all in line with the femoral trochlea. To accomplish this with a TKA, the femoral component is best rotated to the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the tibial component to the tubercle. In this way, when the femoral component sits in its designated location on the tibial polyethylene, the trochlear groove will be ideally situated to “receive” the patella. Knee Mechanics. Six “degrees of freedom” refers to translation and rotation on three axes (x,y,z). This also describes how arthroplasty components can be positioned at surgery. The significant positions of tibial, femoral and patellar components are: 1. Internal-external rotation (around y-axis) and 2. Varus-valgus rotation (around z axis). 3. Medial-lateral translation (on x-axis). The other positional variables are less important for patella tracking. Biomechanical analyses of knee function are often broken down into: i. Extensor power analysis (y-z or sagittal plane) and ii. Tracking (x-y or frontal plane). These must be integrated to include the effects of rotation and to better understand patellar tracking. Effect of Valgus. Frontal plane alignment is important but less likely to reach pathological significance for patellar tracking than rotational malposition clinically. For example if a typical tibia is cut in 5 degrees of unintended mechanical valgus, this will displace the foot about 5 cm laterally but the tibial tubercle only 8 mm laterally. An excessively valgus tibial cut will not displace the tubercle and the patella as far as mal-rotation of the tibial component. Effect of Internal Rotation of Tibial Component. By contrast, internal rotation of the tibial component by 22 degrees, which is only 4 degrees in excess of what has been described as tolerable by Berger and Rubash, displaces the tubercle 14 mm, a distance that would place the center of most patella over the center of the lateral femoral condyle, risking dislocation. Dynamically, as the knee flexes, if the tibia is able to rotate externally this forces the tubercle into an even more lateral position, guaranteeing that the patella will align lateral to the tip of the lateral femoral condyle, and dislocate. The design of femoral components, in particular the varus-valgus angle of the trochlear groove, has an effect on patellar tracking. This effect will be accentuated by the surgical alignment technique of the femoral and tibial components. Component positions that mimic the orientation of the normal anatomy usually include more valgus alignment of the femoral component. This rotates the proximal “entrance” of the femoral trochlear groove more medially, making it more difficult for the patella to descend in the trochlear groove

It is a not so uncommon clinical scenario: well-fixed, well-aligned, balanced total knee arthroplasty with continued pain. However, radiographs also demonstrate an unresurfaced patella. The debate continues and the controversy remains as whether or not to routinely resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. In perhaps the most widely referenced article on the topic, the overall revision rates were no different between the resurfaced (9%) and the unresurfaced (12%) groups and thus their conclusion was that similar results can be obtained with and without resurfacing. However, a deeper look in to the data in this study shows that 4 times more knees in the unresurfaced group were revised for patellofemoral problems. A more recent study concluded that selectively not resurfacing the patella provided similar results when compared to routinely resurfacing. The study does emphasise however, that this conclusion depends greatly on femoral component design and operative diagnoses. This suggests that selective resurfacing with a so-called “patella friendly” femoral component in cases of tibio-femoral osteoarthritis, is a safe and effective strategy. Finally, registry data would support routine resurfacing with a 2.3 times higher relative risk of revision seen in the unresurfaced TKA. Regardless of which side of the debate one lies, the not so uncommon clinical scenario remains; what do we do with the painful TKA with an unresurfaced patella. Precise and accurate diagnosis of the etiology of a painful TKA can be very difficult, and there is likely a strong bias towards early revision with secondary patellar resurfacing in the painful TKA with an unresurfaced TKA. At first glance, secondary resurfacing is associated with relatively poor outcomes. Correia, et al. reported that only half the patients underwent revision TKA with secondary resurfacing had resolution of their complaints. Similarly, only 53% of patients in another series were satisfied with the procedure and pain relief. The conclusions that can be drawn from these studies and others are that either routine patellar resurfacing should be performed in all TKA or, perhaps more importantly, we need to better understand the etiology of pain in an otherwise well-aligned, well-balanced, well-fixed TKA. It is this author's contingency that the presence of an unresurfaced patella leads surgeons to reoperate earlier, without truly identifying the etiology of pain or dissatisfaction. This strong bias; basically there is something more that can be done, therefore we should do it, is the same bias that leads to early revision of partial knee arthroplasty. While very difficult, we as knee surgeons should not revise a partial knee or secondarily resurface a patella due to pain or dissatisfaction. Doing so, unfortunately, only works about half the time. The diagnostic algorithm for evaluating the painful, uresurfaced TKA includes routinely ruling out infection with serum markers and an aspiration. Pre-arthroplasty radiographs should be obtained to confirm suitability and severity of disease for an arthroplasty. An intra-articular diagnostic injection with Marcaine +/− corticosteroid should provide significant pain relief. MARS MRI may be beneficial to evaluate edema within the patella. Lastly, operative implant stickers to confirm implant manufacturer and type are critical as some implants perform less favorably with unresurfaced patellae. To date, no studies of secondary resurfacing describe the results of this, or similar, algorithms for defining patellofemoral problems in the unresurfaced TKA and therefore it is still difficult to conclude that poor results are not simply due to our inherent bias towards early revision and secondary resurfacing of the unresurfaced patella

Resurfacing the patella is performed the majority of the time in the United States and in many regions it is considered standard practice. In many countries, however, the patella is left un-resurfaced an equal amount of the time or even rarely ever resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is not a simple or benign procedure. There are numerous negative sequelae of resurfacing including loosening, fragmentation, avascular necrosis, lateral facet pain, stress fracture, acute fracture, late fracture, and restricted motion. In a study by Berend, Ritter, et al, failures of the patella component were reported 4.2% of the time at an average of only 2.6 years. A study was undertaken at Washington University in recent years to determine rather more clinical problems were observed following total knee replacement with or without patella resurfacing. Records were maintained on all problem total knees cases with well localised anterior knee pain. The referral area for this clinic is St. Louis which is among the largest American cities, with the highest percentage of total knees that are performed without patella resurfacing. During 4 years of referrals of total knee patients with anterior knee pain, 47 cases were identified of which 36 had a resurfaced patella and 11 had a non-resurfaced patella. Eight of 36 resurfaced patellae underwent surgery while only 2 of 11 non-resurfaced patellae underwent subsequent surgery. More than 3 times as many painful total knees that were referred for evaluation had already had their patella resurfaced. In spite of the fact that approximately equal number of total knees were performed in this area without patella resurfacing, far more patients presented to clinic with painful total knee in which the patella had been resurfaced. The numerous pathologies requiring a treatment following patella resurfacing included patella loosening, fragmentation of the patella, avascular necrosis patella, late stress fracture, lateral facet pain, oblique resurfacing, and too thick of a patellar composite. In a large multi-center randomised clinical trial at 5 years from the United Kingdom in over 1700 knees from 34 centers and 116 surgeons, there was no difference in the Oxford Score, SF-12, EQ-5D, or need for further surgery or complications. The authors concluded, “We see no difference in any score, if there is a difference, it is too small to be of any clinical significance”. In a prospective of randomised clinical trial performed at Tulane University over 20 years ago, no differences were observed in knee score, a functional patella questionnaire, or the incidence of anterior knee pain between resurfaced and un-resurfaced patellae at time intervals of 2–4 years, 5–7 years, or greater than 10 years. Beyond 10 years the knee scores of total knee patients with a resurfaced patella had declined significantly greater than those with a non-resurfaced patella. There are numerous advantages of not resurfacing the patella including less surgical time, less expense, a lower risk of “major” complications (especially late complications), and if symptoms develop in an un-resurfaced patella, it is an easier salvage situation with more options available. A small percentage of total knee patients will be symptomatic whether or not their patella is resurfaced. Not resurfacing the patella retains more options and has fewer complications. The major determinant of clinical result and the presence of anterior knee pain after knee replacement is surgical technique and component design not whether or not the patella is resurfaced. Patella resurfacing is occasionally necessary for patients with inflammatory arthritis, a deformed or maltracking patella, or symptoms and pathology that are virtually restricted to the patellofemoral joint. For the vast majority of patients, however, patella resurfacing is not necessary

The decision to resurface the patella has been well studied. While regional differences exist, the overwhelming choice by most Surgeons in the United States is to resurface the patella. Data supports that this is the correct choice. Articular cartilage on metal has not been shown to be a good long term bearing surface. Cushner et al. has also shown that cartilage in the arthritic knee has significant pathologic abnormalities. Patella surfacing has excellent long-term results with a low complication rate. Anterior knee pain is a common complaint after knee replacement and is even more common in TKA with un-resurfaced patella. Pakos et al. had more reoperations and greater anterior knee pain when the patella was NOT resurfaced. Parvizi et al. also found less patient satisfaction with un-resurfaced patellas. Meta-analysis results indicate higher revision rates with un-resurfaced patellas. Bilateral knee studies also favor resurfaced patella. Higher revision rates were also confirmed in the Swedish Registry with a 140% higher revision rate in TKA with un-resurfaced patellas In addition, second operations to resurface the patella often are unsuccessful at alleviating pain. Surgeons who choose not to resurface the patella must accept that their patients will have the same or greater degree of anterior knee pain and a significantly greater risk for reoperation

Patella resurfacing is becoming more routine in total knee replacements with recent reports indicating improved long term outcomes. Despite this, patella osteotomy relies heavily on how the cutting jig is applied rather than on fixed anatomical landmarks. Recognised complications of asymmetric patella resection are patella fractures, patella maltracking, bony impingement and pain. Accurate instruments have been developed for other aspects of total knee replacements. However cutting guides for the patella tend to be cumbersome with poor reproducibility. Patella tilt is defined as the angle subtended by a line joining the medial and lateral edges of the patella and the horizontal. Keeping this angle to a minimum results in congruent alignment of the patella button within the trochlear groove. Current patella cutting jigs do not take this angle into consideration as they require full eversion of the patella laterally, not only making accurate placement of the jig difficult but also putting excessive strain on the surrounding soft tissue. This study describes a new cutting technique for the patella osteotomy which is referenced off the distal femoral condyles ensuring a more accurate and reproducible cut without having to evert the patella. With the femoral component trial in situ and the patella in its normal anatomical lie, the knee is flexed to 30°. The patella cutting jig is then applied in the usual manner making sure that adequate thickness of patella remains but it is placed parallel to a line joining the two condyles of the femoral component. By cutting the patella in this position parallel to the distal femoral condyles, patella tilt is minimised and the patella button will be aligned evenly within the trochlear groove. Currently all patients requiring patella resurfacing at our institution are undergoing this technique and the short term results have been very promising. This study presents a novel patella cutting technique that utilises a fixed landmark to ensure a more accurate and reproducible osteotomy. We are planning a large scale trial comparing pre- and post-operative knee scores and radiological assessment of patients having this new technique compared to standard cutting techniques. This will allow us to report on the longer term effects and pave the way for better patella resurfacing instrumentation

Maltracking of the patella associated with TKA is usually the result of several factors coming together in the same patient. Causes of maltracking include residual valgus limb alignment, valgus placement of the femoral component, patella alta, poor prosthetic geometry, internal rotation of the femoral or tibial component, excessive patellar thickness, asymmetric patellar preparation, failure to perform a lateral release when indicated, capsular dehiscence, and dynamic instability. Prior to wound closure after implantation of total knee arthroplasty, patellar tracking should be evaluated to assess the potential need for lateral release. The incidence of lateral release in the past was quite high in some series. Most experienced surgeons will report a lateral release rate less than 5% for varus knees. It is usually higher for valgus knees because they are often associated with patella alta and preoperative subluxation. The classic intraoperative test for patellar tracking has been referred to as the “rule of no thumb” In this test, first suggested by Fred Ewald, the patella is returned to the trochlear groove in extension with the capsule unclosed. The knee is then passively flexed and one assesses whether or not the patella tracks congruently without capsular closure. If it does and the medial facet of the patellar component contacts the medial aspect of the trochlea no lateral release need be considered. If the patella dislocates or tilts, lateral release may be necessary. The test should be repeated with 1 suture closing the capsule at the level of the superior pole. If tracking then becomes congruent without excessive tension on the suture, no release is necessary. If tilting still persists, some surgeons like to assess tracking with the tourniquet deflated so that any binding effect on the quadriceps can be eliminated from the test. A tight PCL can also impart apparent patellar tilt as the femoral component is drawn posteriorly while the tibia (with its tubercle) moves anteriorly

Abstract. A study was done to test the strength of various configurations of tension band wiring (TBW) and we report clinical results of ‘Horizontal Figure of Eight TBW’ (H – 8 TBW). In an experimental lab, a model of the fractured patella was mounted on a Nene tensile testing machine and various configurations of TBWs were tested in different positions of Kirschner wires. The strength of TBW and various knots securing the ends of wires were analysed on load/displacement graphs. The experimental results were compared with the theoretical results using trigonometry and mathematical equations. Since 1986, H – 8 TBW (Sonanis and Bhende modification) was used clinically in 42 patients (40 fractured patella, and 2 greater trochanteric osteotomies) in 26 males and 16 females and all patients were followed up to average 18 months. Experimentally H – 8 TBW (0.8mm wire) could resist maximum distraction force of 700 N and achieved maximum compression. Placement of the two Kirschner wires at the mid way between centre and edge of patella at the level of fracture site achieved optimum rotational stability and compression. Crimping method of gripping the ends of wires was the most secured method (120 N). Clinically bony union using H-8 TBW was achieved in all 41 patients. Complications seen were wire discomfort in 3 patients and one death. We conclude that H – 8 TBW achieved maximum compression, optimum K wire placement was at the 1/4th distance from the edge of the patella, and crimping the ends of wire secured best fixation

Whether to resurface the patella during a primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR) performed as a treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis remain a controversial issue. Patellar resurfacing was introduced because early implants were not designed to accommodate the native patella in an anatomic fashion during the range of motion. Complications related to patella resurfacing became a primary concern and have been associated with the variable revision rates often report post TKR. Subsequent modifications in implant design have been made to offer the surgeon option of leaving the patella un-resurfaced. Numerous clinical trials have been done to determine the superiority of each option. Unfortunately, there is little consensus and surgeon preference remains the primary variable. One of the major reasons given to support patella resurfacing is to eliminate Anterior Knee Pain post operatively. However, studies have shown that this problem was not exclusively found in non-resurfaced patients so the author conclude that anterior knee pain is probably related to component design or to the details of the surgical technique, such as component rotation rather that whether or not the patella is resurfaced. An increasing rate of complications with the extensor mechanism after patellar resurfacing led to the concept of selective resurfacing of the patella in TKR. Decision making algorithms with basis of clinical, radiographic and intraoperative parameters have been developed to determine which patients are suitable for patella resurfacing and which are suitable for patella non-resurfacing. Finally, the continued study of this topic with longer follow up term in randomized, controlled, clinical trials remains essential in our understanding of patella in TKR. The development of joint registry will allow surgeons to draw conclusions on the basis of larger numbers of patients and will improve the reporting of the results of patellar non resurfacing in clinical trials. In general, surgeons in United States always resurface while their counterparts in Europe tend to never resurface

Purpose. In vivo comparative gap measurements were performed in 3 different patella positions (reduced, subluxated and everted) using offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system. Methods. Prospectively, 50 knees were operated by TKA using a navigation-assisted gap balancing technique. The offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system was used for gap measurements. This commercially-available instrument allows controllable tension in patella reduced position. The mediolateral gaps of knee extension (0°) and flexion (90°) angle were recorded in 3 different patella positions; reduced, subluxated and everted. Any gap differences of more than 3 mm were considered as a meaningful difference. Correlation between the difference with the demographic data, preoperative radiologic alignment and intraoperative data was analyzed. For statistical analysis, ANOVA and Pearson correlation test were used. Results. The gaps in patella eversion demonstrated smaller gaps both in knee extension and flexion position compared to the gaps of patella reduction position. The amount of decreased gaps was more definite in knee flexion position. Statistically significant difference were observed for the lateral gap of patella eversion compared to gap of patella reduction in knee flexion position (p<0.05). There were notable cases of variability in knee flexion position. Significant portion 12 (24%) knees of patella subluxation and 33 (66%) knees of patella evertion demonstrated either increased or decreased gaps in knee flexion position compared from the gaps of patella reduction position. Conclusion. The gaps in patella eversion demonstrated smaller gaps both in knee extension and flexion position compared to the gaps of patella reduction position. The amount of decreased gaps was more definite in knee flexion position. Therefore, the intraoperative patellar positioning has influence on the measurement of the joint gap. Keeping the patella in reduced position is important during gap balancing

Functional restoration of patella kinematics is an essential component of TKA, whether the patella is replaced or not. This goal is accomplished by a multifactorial approach: establish proper component position and alignment, especially rotation; avoid IR of the femoral and ER of the tibial components; maintain correct joint line position; achieve symmetrical soft tissue balance. Most modern TKA designs have an anatomic trochlear groove shape to enable midline tracking. Patella implants are better designed as well with three equilateral lugs for fixation and either dome or anatomic shape. The apex of the patella component should be aligned with the apex of the patella raphe which is more medial than lateral. This method leaves an island of exposed lateral patella facet which is managed with the “lateral slat technique” to be described. It is essentially an intraosseous lateral release. The early mobilization of modern TKA patients demands watertight closure to prevent soft tissue attenuation and late tracking issues. When confronted with a patient with a laterally dislocated patella, implementation of the “lateral slat technique” should be done at the approach to obtain midline tracking. Such patients require a median parapatellar (MPP) approach and may need distal-lateral vastus medialis advancement (Insall procedure). Adherence to the principles iterated herein will produce a happy patient with good patello-femoral kinematics and function

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shape of patella relative to the femoral epicondylar axis and to find sex differences. Materials and methods. Computed tomography (CT) images of 100 knees with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in 100 patients were prospectively collected. All patients were diagnosed as varus-type osteoarthritis with no destructive patellar deformity. Fifty patients were male and 50 female. The average male age was 70.8±14.6 (mean ± SD) years and the average female age was 73.3±6.7 years. Forty nine knees were right and 51 knees were left. The average height of males was 162.6±7.4 cm and that of females 149.6±5.7 cm. Males were significantly taller than females. The CT scan was performed with 2mm-interval slices in the vertical plane to the long axis of femoral shaft. Every CT image was examined to determine the maximum distance between the medial and lateral femoral epicondyle (inter-epicondylar distance, IED) along the epicondylar axis. The maximum patellar width and thickness were also measured at the image which had these maximum distances, while patellar cartilage thickness in anteroposterior diameter was not measured in this study. For evaluating the patellar size, each measured value was divided by IED and calculated each ratio. The ratio of patellar width to patellar thickness was also calculated. All parameters were compared between males and females. Statistical software Statview ver.5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used for all analyses with significance being set at the 5% level. Results. Measured values are presented on Table 1. The average IED, patellar width and patellar thickness of males were all significantly larger than those of females. As shown in Table 2, by contrast, each ratio to IED was almost the same between the sexes and there were no significant differences. The ratio of patellar width to patellar thickness was 46.7±2.6% in males and 46.6±2.9% in females. Discussion. Although some studies have assessed the actual measurement values of patella, no prior study, to our knowledge, has morphologically evaluated the patella relative to the femur. This is the first study to investigate the configuration and location of patella relative to femoral epicondylar axis. Our results showed the configuration of patella relative to the femoral epicondylar axis was the same between sexes. The patellar width is approximately 56% and TGD is approximately 39% of IED. The most common complications after the surgery are related to patellofemoral problems. The ideal thickness of the resurfaced patella has not been clearly investigated. Patellar disabilities are associated with both decreased and increased patellar thickness— a thin patella could lead to anteroposterior patellar instability and a thick patella could increase the risk of stiffness of the knee and patellar subluxation. Therefore, it is desirable to restore the original patellar thickness during surgery. The results of current study showed that the ratio of patellar width to the patellar thickness was about 47%, which is useful to determine the thickness of patella during surgeries for severely damaged knees or revision surgeries

To resurface or not to resurface the patella… that is the question. It all comes down to where you practice. It is controversial in that there is a risk of possible complications from resurfacing versus the potential for simply having complaints of pain which may supposedly arise from the anterior knee stemming from the unresurfaced patella. The evolution of more favorable anatomic femoral component designs which are very friendly to the patellofemoral articulation have resulted in lower patella resurfacing complications. The insertion of appropriately externally rotated tibial and femoral components, if not reducing anterior knee pain, have certainly minimised the risk of resurfaced patella complications. Also, with current surgical techniques of component insertion, the lateral release rate is extremely low, thus avoiding the possibility of avascularity developing in the resurfaced patella. This complication will almost completely be eliminated if the patella thickness is kept greater than 13 mm after patella resection. In my experience, patella complications from the resurfaced patella are extremely rare. Many unicompartmental knees require re-operation because of the development of progressive patellofemoral arthritis. Re-operation from anterior knee pain from progressive arthritis from the unresurfaced patella has given inferior results. Overall, meta-analysis data demonstrates decreased satisfaction, increased anterior knee pain and higher early revision rates in the unresurfaced group. National joint registries, especially the Australian registry support routine resurfacing; complications are low and outcomes are improved. Even though there exists controversy as to whether the patella should be resurfaced or not, there is an overwhelming consensus in the U.S. that there is little downfall nowadays with respect to resurfacing the patella

OBJECTIVES. The use of a mobile bearing has been suggested to decrease the rate of patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, to resurface or retain the native patella remains debated. Few long-term results have been documented. The present retrospective study was designed to evaluate the long-term (more than 10 years) results of mobile bearing TKAs on a national scale, and to compare pain results and survivorship according to the status of the patella. The primary hypothesis of this study was that the 10 year survival rate of mobile bearing TKAs with patella resurfacing will be different from that of mobile bearing TKAs with native patella retaining. METHODS. All patients operated on between 2001 and 2004 in all participating centers for implantation of a TKA (whatever design used) were eligible for this study. Usual demographic and peri-operative items have been recorded. All patients were contacted after the 10 year follow-up for repeat clinical examination (Knee Society score (KSS), Oxford knee questionnaire). Patients who did not return were interviewed by phone call. For patients lost of follow-up, family or general practitioner was contacted to obtain relevant information about prosthesis survival. TKAs with resurfaced patella and TKAs with retained native patella were paired according to age, gender, body mass index and severity of the coronal deformation (with steps of 5°). Pain score, KSS and Oxford knee score were compared between two groups with a Student t-test at a 0.05 level of significance. Survival curve was plotted according to the actuarial technique, using the revision for mechanical reason as end-point. The influence of the patella status was assessed with a logrank test at a 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS. 1,604 TKAs were implanted during the study time-frame. 849 cases could be paired according to age, gender, BMI and severity of the pre-operative coronal deformation (2/1 ratio) into two groups: resurfaced patella (496 cases) and retained patella (243 cases). There was no difference in any baseline criteria between both groups. 150 patients deceased before the 10 year follow up (18%). Final follow-up was obtained for 489 cases (58%). 31 reoperations (prosthesis exchange or patellofemoral revision) were performed during the study time frame (4%), with 17 reoperations for mechanical reasons (3%). KSS and Oxford knee score were significantly higher for TKAs without patella resurfacing, there was a significant difference between the 13 year survival rates of TKAs with resurfaced patella (97%) and TKAs with retained native patella (93%). CONCLUSIONS. The primary hypothesis was confirmed: 10 year survival rate of mobile bearing TKAs with patella resurfacing was better than mobile bearing TKAs with native patella retaining. Patella resurfacing may lead to a better survival after mobile bearing TKA. However, the clinical results were better after patella resurfacing when the index TKA was not revised