Anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (AA-THA) has a steep learning curve, with higher complication rates in initial cases. Proper surgical case selection during the learning curve can reduce early risk. This study aims to identify patient and radiographic factors associated with AA-THA difficulty using Machine Learning (ML).

Consecutive primary AA-THA patients from two centres, operated by two expert surgeons, were enrolled (excluding patients with prior hip surgery and first 100 cases per surgeon). K- means prototype clustering – an unsupervised ML algorithm – was used with two variables - operative duration and surgical complications within 6 weeks - to cluster operations into difficult or standard groups.

Radiographic measurements (neck shaft angle, offset, LCEA, inter-teardrop distance, Tonnis grade) were measured by two independent observers. These factors, alongside patient factors (BMI, age, sex, laterality) were employed in a multivariate logistic regression analysis and used for k-means clustering. Significant continuous variables were investigated for predictive accuracy using Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC).

Out of 328 THAs analyzed, 130 (40%) were classified as difficult and 198 (60%) as standard. Difficult group had a mean operative time of 106mins (range 99–116) with 2 complications, while standard group had a mean operative time of 77mins (range 69–86) with 0 complications. Decreasing inter-teardrop distance (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–0.99, p = 0.03) and right-sided operations (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10–2.72, p = 0.02) were associated with operative difficulty. However, ROC analysis showed poor predictive accuracy for these factors alone, with area under the curve of 0.56. Inter-observer reliability was reported as excellent (ICC >0.7).

Right-sided hips (for right-hand dominant surgeons) and decreasing inter-teardrop distance were associated with case difficulty in AA-THA. These data could guide case selection during the learning phase. A larger dataset with more complications may reveal further factors.

The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed in 2007 as a predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery following a neck of femur fracture. The National Hip Fracture Database is the standard used which calculated their own score using national data. The NHF score for 30-day mortality was calculated for 50 patients presenting with a fractured neck femur injury between January 2020 to March 2020. A score <5 was classified as low risk and >/=5 as high risk. Aim was to assess the accuracy in calculating the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score against the National Hip Fracture Database. To explore whether it should it be routinely included during initial assessment to aid clinical management?. There was an increase in the number of mortalities observed in patients who belonged to the high-risk group (>=5) compared to the low risk group. COVID-19 positive patients had worse outcomes with average 30-day mortality of 6.78 compared to the average of 6.06. GEH NHF score per month showed significant accuracy against the NHFD scores. The identification of high-risk groups from their NHF score can allow for targeted optimisations and elucidation of risk factors easily gathered at the point of hospitalisation. The NHFS is a valuable tool and useful predictor to stratify the risk of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Inclusion of the score should be considered as mandatory Trust policy for neck of femur fracture patients to aid clinical management and improve patient safety overall

Neurological complications in oncological and degenerative spine surgery represent one of the most feared risks of these procedures. Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) mainly uses methods to detect changes in the patient's neurological status in a timely manner, thus allowing actions that can reverse neurological deficits before they become irreversible. The utopian goal of spinal surgery is the absence of neurological complications while the realistic goal is to optimize the responses to changes in neuromonitoring such that permanent deficits occur less frequently as possible. In 2014, an algorithm was proposed in response to changes in neuromonitoring for deformity corrections in spinal surgery. There are several studies that confirm the positive impact that a checklist has on care. The proposed checklist has been specifically designed for interventions on stable columns which is significantly different from oncological and degenerative surgery. The goal of this project is to provide a checklist for oncological and degenerative spine surgery to improve the quality of care and minimize the risk of neurological deficit through the optimization of clinical decision-making during periods of intraoperative stress or uncertainty. After a literature review on risk factors and recommendations for responding to IONM changes, 3 surveys were administered to 8 surgeons with experience in oncological and degenerative spine surgery from 5 hospitals in Italy. In addition, anesthesiologists, intraoperative neuro-monitoring teams, operating room nurses participated. The members participated in the optimization and final drafting of the checklist. The authors reassessed and modified the checklist during 3 meetings over 9 months, including a clinical validation period using a modified Delphi process. A checklist containing 28 items to be considered in responding to the changes of the IONM was created. The checklist was submitted for inclusion in the new recommendations of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SINC) for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The final checklist represents the consensus of a group of experienced spine surgeons. The checklist includes the most important and high-performance items to consider when responding to IONM changes in patients with an unstable spine. The implementation of this checklist has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient safety in the field of spinal surgery

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. In the NHS the structure of a “regular healthcare team” is no longer the case. The NHS is facing a workforce crisis where cross-covering of ward-based health professionals is at an all-time high, this includes nurses, doctors, therapists, pharmacists and clerks. Comprehensive post-operative care documentation is essential to maintain patient safety, reduce information clarification requests, delays in rehabilitation, treatment, and investigations. The value of complete surgical registry data is emerging, and in the UK this has recently become mandated, but the completeness of post-operative care documentation is not held to the same importance, and at present there is no published standard. This project summarises a 4-stage approach, including 6 audit cycles, >400 reviewed operation notes, over a 5 year period. OBJECTIVE. To deliver a sustainable change in post operative care documentation practices through quality improvement frameworks. METHODS. Stage 1: Characterise the problem and increase engagement through: SMART aims, process mapping, hybrid action-effect and driver diagram and stakeholder analysis. Multi disciplinary stakeholders were involved in achieving a consensus of evidence-based auditable criteria. Stage 2: Baseline audit to assess current practice. Stage 3: Intervention planning by stakeholders. Stage 4: Longitudinal monitoring through run charts and iterative refinement. RESULTS. Stage 1: Process mapping identified numerous downstream effects of the absence of critical information from operation notes, and the action-effect diagram highlighted the multiple unnecessary mitigating actions performed by ward staff. An MDT consensus was achieved on 15 essential criteria for complete documentation, including important negative fields. Interest-influence matrix identified stakeholder groups with high influence but low interest who needed engagement to deliver change. Stage 2: Baseline audit demonstrated unexpectedly poor documentation: >75% compliance in 4 criteria, and <50% compliance in 10 criteria, which elevated the interest of key stakeholders. Stage 3: A post-operative care template based on the 15 criteria was embedded within the existing IT software. It allowed use of existing operative templates, with a non-overwriting suffix requiring only two mouse clicks. Stage 4: Re-audit at 3 and 12 months showed improved and sustained compliance. At 24 months compliance had declined. Questionnaire of template usage identified problems of criteria response options, and lack of awareness of template by newly appointed staff. Template update improved compliance over the next 6 months (>75% compliance in 11 criteria). Finally, a further reaudit conducted 12 months after the template update (5 years post baseline audit) showed a sustained improvement in compliance (>75% compliance in 13 criteria). CONCLUSIONS. Simple innovation through quality improvement frameworks has changed documentation practices by 1) achieving a consensus from stakeholders, 2) a “shock and awe” moment to highlight existing poor documentation and increase engagement 3) implementing change which fit easily into existing systems, 4) respecting autonomy rather than enforcing change and 5) longitudinal monitoring using run charts and an iterative process to ensure the template remains fit for purpose. This model has now successfully been translated to other subspecialities within the orthopaedic department. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Adverse events (AEs) are still a major problem in spinal surgery, despite advances in surgical techniques, innovative technologies available and the introduction of checklist and predictive score systems aimed at reducing surgical complications. We previously analysed the results of the introduction of the WHO Safety Surgical Checklist (SSC) in our Institution, comparing the incidence of complications between two periods: from January to December 2010 (without checklist) and from January 2011 and December 2012 (with checklist), in order to assess the checklist effectiveness. The sample size was 917 patients with an average of 30 months of follow-up. Complications were observed in 107 patients (11.6%) among 917 spinal surgery procedures performed, with 159 (17.3%) complications in total. The overall incidence of complications for trauma, infectious pathology, oncology, and degenerative disease was 22.2%, 19.2%, 18.4%, and 15.3%, respectively. We observed a reduction of the overall incidence of complications following the introduction of the WHO Surgical Checklist: in 2010 without checklist, the incidence of complications was 24.2%, while in 2011 and 2012, following the checklist introduction, the incidence of complications was 16.7% and 11.7%, respectively (mean 14.2%) (p<0.0005). Thus, the SSC appeared to be an effective tool to reduce complications in spinal surgery and we proposed to extend the use of checklist system also to the pre-operative and post-operative phases in order to further reduce the incidence of complications. We also believe that a correct capture and classification of complications is fundamental to generate a clinical decision support system aimed at improving patients’ safety in spinal surgery. In the period between January 2017 and January 2018 we prospectively recorded the adverse events and complications of patients undergoing spinal surgery in our department, without using any collection system. Then we retrospectively recorded the intraoperative and postoperative adverse events of surgically treated patients during the same one-year period, using the SAVES v2 system introduced by Rampersaud and collaborators (Rampersaud YR et al. J Neurosurg Spine 2016 Aug; 25 (2): 256-63) to classify them. In the one-year period from January 2017 to January 2018 a total of 336 patients underwent spinal surgery: 223 for degenerative conditions and 113 for spinal tumors. Comorbidities were collected (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]). Overall, a higher number of adverse events (AEs) was recorded using SAVES compared to the prospective recording without the use of any capture system and the increased number was statistically significant for early postoperative AEs (138/336 vs 44/336, p<0.001). 210 adverse events were retrospectively recorded using the SAVES system (30 intraoperative adverse events, 138 early postoperative and 42 late postoperative adverse events). 99 patients (29.5%) on the cohort had at least one complication. Furthermore, the correlation between some risk factors and the onset of complications or the prolonged length of stay was statistically analyzed. The risk factors taken into account were: age, presence of comorbidities (CCI), ASA score, previous surgery at the same level, type of intervention, location of the disease, duration of the surgery. In particular, the duration of the surgery (more than 3 hours) and the presence of previous surgeries resulted to be risk factors for complications in multivariate analyses

Introduction and Objective. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) is becoming an increasingly important means of improving skills acquisition, optimizing clinical outcomes, and promoting patient safety in orthopedics and traumatology. Pediatric Orthopedics (PO) often deals with the surgical treatment of congenital or acquired limbs and spine deformities during infancy. The objective is to restore function, improve aesthetics, and ensure proper residual growth of limbs and spine, using osteotomies, bone grafts, age-specific or custom-made hardware and implants. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional (3D) digital models were generated from Computed Tomography (CT) scans, using free open-source software, and the surgery was planned and simulated starting from the 3D digital model. 3D printed sterilizable models were fabricated using a low-cost 3D printer, and animations of the operation were generated with the aim to accurately explain the operation to parents. All procedures were successfully planned using our VSP method and the 3D printed models were used during the operation, improving the understanding of the severely abnormal bony anatomy. Results. The surgery was precisely reproduced according to VSP and the deformities were successfully corrected in eight cases (3 genu varum in Blount disease, 2 coxa vara in pseudo achondroplasia, 1 SCFE, 1 missed Monteggia lesion and 1 post-traumatic forearm malunion deformity). In one case, a focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia, the intraoperative intentional undersizing of the bone osteotomy produced an incomplete correction of a congenital forearm deformity. Conclusions. Our study describes the application of a safe, effective, user-friendly, VSP process in PO surgery. We are convinced that our study will stimulate the widespread adoption of this technological innovation in routine clinical practice for the treatment of rare congenital and post-traumatic limb deformities during childhood

Introduction. The transition from resident to registrar constitutes a steep learning curve in most medical practitioners’ careers, regardless of speciality. We aimed to determine whether a six-week orthopaedic surgical skills course could increase resident skills and confidence prior to transitioning to orthopaedic registrar within the Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia. Materials. Unaccredited registrars, orthopaedic trainees, and orthopaedic consultants, through a departmental peer reviewed process and survey, developed a six-session course (“Registrar Academy”) that included basic knowledge and essential practical skills training for residents with an interest in becoming orthopaedic registrars. This course was implemented over a 3-month period and assessed. Mixed method quantitative and qualitative evidence was sought via a 14-item and 18-item Likert scale questionnaire coupled with open-ended questions. Ethical approval was granted by our institutions Human Research and Ethics Comittee, reference no.: HREC/16/QGC336. Results/Discussion. Results were qualitatively synthesised using quantitative and qualitative data. Thirteen residents participated in the course. All residents agreed to statements indicating they felt unprepared to work as an orthopaedic registrar and were not confident in performing various core tasks required. After completing the course, residents indicated greater confidence or comfort in all these areas and felt better prepared for the transition to registrar. There was broad approval of the course among participants. Every participant who completed the final questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the course and that it taught usable, reproducible practical skills and increased their orthopaedic knowledge. This group also uniformly agreed or strongly agreed that the course improved their patient care and patient safety. Conclusion. Residents feel unprepared for their transition to orthopaedic registrar and lack confidence in several core competencies. A supplemental “Registrar Academy” within an institution is an effective way to improve knowledge, confidence, and practical skills for residents wishing to transition to a registrar position

Evaluation of different biomaterials is being performed with various methods trying to simulate the closest hostile-like in vitro environments. However the complexity of the conditions usually limits practically feasible combination of most relevant chemical, biological, biomechanical parameters in one single test. Many biomaterials and tissue engineering developments rely on high-throughput screening to multiply number of specimens and thus to gather sufficient data. The price to be paid for these methods is limited number of physical readouts, increased inter-specimens scatter, and unavoidable spatial constrains driving the conditions away of the clinical scenarios. For orthopaedic biomaterials this is of a particular concern, as implantation site conditions cannot be squeezed too much without lost of natural-mimicking stimuli. Here we are presenting another approach based on high-output screening of biomaterials, which is based on the strategy of raising the number of readouts obtainable from every specimen at more clinically-relevant conditions. On the contrary to common methods like ISO 10993 or simplified biomechanical tests, the biomaterials enhanced simulation testing (BEST) evaluates specimens without pre-selected biomaterial model, assessing the whole specimen as would happen in the implantation site. Besides reducing the risk of improper conclusions caused by wrong material model choice, the data processing with non-local method intrinsically includes the test history bypassing common challenges usually seen with hereditary integration. For properly designed experiment, readouts might include invariant moduli, viscous stiffness, fluidity, fluid permittivity and diffusivity (without need for pressure-driven separate tests), fluid source, effective channel size, and swelling pressure (if swelling is present) in addition to conventional biomechanical parameters. New solutions in advanced and consistent evaluations for biomaterials allow better risks control, shorten lead development time and costs, and compliant with 3R-strategy (2010/63/EC) and new regulatory requirements (2012/0266/COD in EU and FY2017 regulatory priorities by FDA). The approach shown is able to combine scientifically based tests with multi-purpose protocols to secure patient safety by screening of biomaterials under proper conditions. The authors thank Finnish Agency for Innovations (Tekes) for providing partial financial support

Background. Adequate pain management is mandatory for patients' early rehabilitation and improvement of outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conventional pain management, consisted of mainly opioids, has some adverse effects such as dizziness and nausea. Motor blockade occasionally resulted from epidural analgesics. A novel multimodal analgesic strategy with peripheral nerve block, peri-articular injection (PAI) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) were utilized for our patients receiving TKA. In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects in the group of multimodal analgesia (MA) or epidural analgesia alone. Methods. One hundred and eighteen patients undergoing TKA with spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients of TKA received either our protocol of multimodal analgesia or patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) alone. MA included ultrasound guided nerve block in femoral and obturator nerves before spinal anesthesia, and PAI mixed with NSAID, morphine, ropivacaine and epinephrine, as well as IVPCA after surgeries. The analgesic effect with numeric rating scale (NRS) and occurrence of adverse effects, including motor blockade, numbness, postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), and dizziness were recorded for all patients. Results. Thirty-one patients received MA, and eighty-seven patients received PCEA. No significant difference of NRS in MA and PCEA group within 24 hours after surgery either in rest (0.2 ± 1 compared with 0.22 ± 0.98; p = 0.930) or motion (0.40 ± 1.56 compared with 0.31± 1.23; p = 0.764). MA group sustained lesser motor blockade than PCEA (6.45% compared with 22.98%; p = 0.028) beyond 24 hours after surgery. The occurrence of numbness is lower in MA group (18.52%) compared with PCEA group(43.33%) (p=0.031). No statistic difference of PONV and dizziness is noted between two groups. However, there is a trend that lesser PONV and dizziness occurred in MA group than PCEA group. Conclusion. TKA patients receiving either MA or PCEA have adequate analgesic efficacy after surgeries. MA group has a lower incidence of motor blockade and PONV than PCEA. This multimodal analgesia proposed here has shown patients' safety and improved pain control after TKA, decreased narcotics use and their associated side effects. Besides, lesser motor blockade and adequate pain relief may encourage patient's early rehabilitation

Aim. The knee radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the knee joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation. Also, each knee radiograph costs approximately £37.16 to produce. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Pittsburgh knee rules to attempt to reduce the number of knee radiographs taken in patients with acute knee injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. Method. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 149 knee requests and radiographs taken during October 2016 were evaluated. Each knee radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Pittsburgh knee rules to give a qualifying score. The Pittsburgh knee rules assigns 1 point for each of the following; blunt trauma or a fall, age less than 12 years or over 50 years, and unable to take 4 limping weight bearing steps in the emergency department. A Pittsburgh knee rule qualifying score warranting a knee radiograph is 2 or more points, where the patient must have had blunt trauma or a fall. A Pittsburgh knee rule score less than 2 points predicts a non-fractured knee and hence no radiograph warranted. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. Results. The clinical audit identified 85 true negative patients where their Pittsburgh knee rule score was less than 2 points and they did not have a fracture of the knee joint. The Pittsburgh knee rule score of less than 2 points did not warrant obtaining knee radiographs. Therefore, a total of 85 knee radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 127.5 days of background radiation. The financial burden of these unnecessary radiographs is £2648.60. The negative predictive value of the Pittsburgh knee rules in this audit was 93.4%. Discussion. The clinical audit shows that the use of the Pittsburgh knee rules scoring system can reduce the number of knee radiographs obtained by 57.4% and hence the doses of ionising radiation patients are exposed to. The audit also showed this clinical scoring system has a high negative predictive value that when utilised can discern patients with a normal knee joint who do not require a knee radiograph. In conclusion employing the Pittsburgh knee rule scoring system can improve patient safety by reducing ionising radiation exposure and can reduce financial costs of patient encounters

Introduction:. Antimicrobial resistance is an important patient safety issue. Antibiotic Stewardship is one of the key strategies in tackling this problem. We present our data over a two year period from October 2011 to December 2013. Method:. A multidisciplinary, consultant led antibiotic ward round was implemented in October 2011. This involved the consultant orthopaedic surgeon, microbiologist, pharmacist and antibiotic prescription nurse. Data from the meetings was collected prospectively over a 118 week period using a standard data form. The case notes, prescription kardex, laboratory results including microbiology data and clinical information of patients was available at the time of the Ward round. The indications for, choice of antibiotics, duration and further treatment plan were made and a note for the case notes was dictated immediately. Changes to prescriptions were also made at the time. Results:. Over the first 2 years 269 patients were reviewed. We noticed a 22% decrease in the volume of IV antibiotic prescriptions. 35% of antibiotic prescriptions were de-escalated (reducing the dose or narrowing the spectrum), however 9% required escalation. 2% of prescriptions were stopped for being clinically not required any more. There was 48% decrease in costs of IV antibiotics and 30% decrease in total cost of oral and IV antimicrobials. Discussion:. We find that this exercise leads to a clear, documented, more cohesive approach to patients' treatment which improves patient care. It makes the orthopaedic consultant and on call team aware of all patients on antibiotics and the plan for the following week. Conclusion:. Antibiotic Stewardship in our hospital has led to the decrease in the use of antibiotics and reduced costs along with several other soft benefits in patient treatment. Given the rising problem of antibiotic resistance, this key pillar strategy against it should be implemented in all hospitals

Few doctors answer their bleep by stating who they are. Answering the phone in a formal manner is of utmost importance in the hospital setting especially by on-call teams who are normally referred patients by other specialties, general practitioners and in some cases by other hospitals. An audit to evaluate the internal hospital communication was completed. In the first part of this audit, junior doctors within the orthopaedic department at the RAH were bleeped. Doctors were expected to answer by initiating the conversation by stating (1) name, (2) department, (3) grade and (4) a greeting. A list of omissions was recorded. If the call went through switchboard, it was expected that the hospital name was stated. The second part of the audit extended to other specialties in the RAH as well as orthopaedic departments in hospitals within the Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board (NHS GGC). Forty-three bleeps were made to doctors of various grades over a period of two months. Nine bleeps (two from other hospitals) were not answered. Five doctors answered their bleep in full. Only twenty-one doctors stated their name whilst eleven stated their grade. In both instances the department was not necessarily stated. The results were similar between the different departments as well as between the seven hospitals offering an orthopaedic service within NHS GGC. Of the thirteen on-call doctors that were bleeped as an external call through switchboard, only one doctor stated the hospital name. This has implications since most hospitals within NHS GGC share a common switchboard. These results emphasise the need for a protocol within NHS GGC for a standard etiquette for intra and inter hospital communication to ensure that patient safety and confidentiality is safeguarded

Summary Statement. Incorrect pedicle screw placement can lead to neurological complications. Practice outside the operating room on realistic bone models, with force feedback, could improve safety. Pedicle forces in cadaveric specimens are reported, to support development of a training tool for residents. Introduction. Inserting screws into the vertebral pedicles is a challenging step in spinal fusion and scoliosis surgeries. Errors in placement can lead to neurological complications and poor mechanical fixation. The more experienced the surgeon, the better the accuracy of the screw placement. A physical training system would provide orthopaedic residents with the feel of performing pedicle cannulation before operating on a patient. The proposed system consists of realistic bone models mimicking the geometry and material properties of typical patients, coupled with a force feedback probe. The purpose of the present study was to determine the forces encountered during pedicle probing to aid in the development of this training system. Methods. We performed two separate investigations. In the first study, 15 participants (9 expert surgeons, 3 fellows, 3 residents) were asked to press a standard pedicle awl three times onto a mechanical scale, blinded to the force, demonstrating what force they would apply during safe pedicle cannulation and during unsafe cortical breach. In the second study, three experienced surgeons used a standard pedicle awl fitted with a one-degree of freedom load cell to probe selected thoracolumbar vertebrae of eight cadaveric specimens to measure the forces required during pedicle cannulation and deliberate breaching, in randomised order. A total of 42 pedicles were tested. Results. Both studies had wide variations in the results, but were in general agreement. Cannulation (safe) forces averaged approximately 90 N (20 lb) whereas breach (unsafe) forces averaged approximately 135–155 N (30–35 lb). The lowest average forces in the cadaveric study were for pedicle cannulation, averaging 86 N (range, 23–125 N), which was significantly lower (p<0.001) than for anterior breach (135 N; range, 80–195 N); medial breach (149 N; range, 98–186 N) and lateral breach (157 N; range, 114–228 N). There were no significant differences among the breach forces (p>0.1). Cannulation forces were on average 59% of the breach forces (range, 19–84%) or conversely, breach forces were 70% higher than cannulation forces. Discussion. To our knowledge, axial force data have not previously been reported for pedicle cannulation and breaching. A large range of forces was measured, as is experienced clinically. Additional testing is planned with a six-degree-of-freedom load cell to determine all of the forces and moments involved in cannulation and breaching throughout the thoracolumbar spine. These results will inform the development of a realistic bone model as well as a breach prediction algorithm for a physical training system for spine surgery. The opportunity to learn and practice outside of the operating room, including learning from deliberate mistakes, should increase the confidence and comprehension of residents performing the procedure, enhance patient safety, reduce surgical time, and allow faster progression of learning inside the operating room

Objectives

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is being used increasingly often in the clinical setting to treat tendon-related pathologies. Yet the optimal PRP preparations to promote tendon healing in different patient populations are poorly defined. Here, we sought to determine whether increasing the concentration of platelet-derived proteins within a derivative of PRP, platelet lysate (PL), enhances tenocyte proliferation and migration in vitro, and whether the mitogenic properties of PL change with donor age.

Objectives

To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice.