Aim. Hand-disinfection (HD) is the most effective infection-prevention-measure. HD-performance of health care professionals (HCP) is usually evaluated by compliance observations (CO). The Hawthorne effect (HE) (HCP behave differently under observation) is considered to systematically increase HD-compliance-rates during CO. However, little is known about the specifications of the HE in health care settings. We hypothesized that, due to hand-hygiene`s known impact on patient safety and infection-prevention, the HE does not affect HD performance during direct patient care in patient-rooms. Method. We conducted a prospective observational trial on an 18-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU), a 12-bed surgical intermediate care unit (IMC) and a 36-bed surgical normal ward (NW) in a university hospital in Germany. Dispensers of hand sanitizers were equipped with an electronic monitoring system (EMS) (GWA Hygiene, Germany), which recorded the number of HDs per patient hour (HD/PH) and time and location of hand-disinfections. Locations were categorized as follows: 1. Patient rooms (PR); 2. Utility- and waste-disposal-rooms (UWR) and 3. Other rooms (hallways, kitchen, toilets etc.) (OR). Additionally trained infection-control-staff performed hand-hygiene CO according to WHO's Five Moments. The HD/PH during CO was compared to the HD/PH during the same time-periods without CO. Additionally the ratio between HD/PD-change during CO and mean-HD/PD of each ward during the study-period was determined in percentages. Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using R. P-values ≤ 0.05 were regarded as significant. Results. 587.128 HD were electronically recorded during the study-period (February 2022 to May 2023) and CO took place on 72 days. We recorded a significant increase of HD/PH during CO on all three wards in PRs (ICU: 21%, p<0.001; IMC: 11%, p=0.029; NW: 49%, p=0.047). Furthermore we detected a significant increase of HD/PH during CO on ICU (10%, p<0.001) and IMC (11%, p=0.033) in ORs. CO did not significantly affect HD/PH in ORs on NW and in UWR on all three wards. Conclusions. In our setting, the number of hand-disinfections per patient-hour was significantly increased during compliance-observations especially in patient-rooms, where hand-hygiene is most crucial for infection-prevention. This indicates a lower everyday compliance to WHO`s hand-hygiene indications during patient care than determined by compliance-observations. Acknowledgments. Paul-Hartmann AG financially supported this study

Aims. Current antibiotic treatment strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are based mostly on observational retrospective studies. High-quality data from prospective cohorts using identical treatment strategies may improve current clinical practice. We developed a regional network of collaborating hospitals and established a uniform treatment protocol. Data from all patients diagnosed with a PJI are prospectively registered in a an online database. With this quality registry we aim to study the outcome of antibiotic and surgical strategies while adhering to a pre-established treatment protocol. Methods. A working group of orthopaedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists and microbiologists was established. The working group reached consensus on definition of PJI and a uniform treatment protocol, based on current guidelines and expert-based clinical experience. A website was built to communicate information to colleagues and patients (. www.protheseinfectie.nl. ). In each participating hospital weekly multidisciplinary meetings were started to discuss all PJI cases. All patients are included in an online quality registry and followed for at least two years. We aim to enroll >600 patients with a knee or hip PJI. Research will focus on the duration of antibiotic treatment, antibiotic suppressive therapy and comparison of different oral antibiotic treatment strategies in relation to successful treatment outcomes. Results. Currently, four regional hospitals are included in the partnership. Multidisciplinary meetings have lowered the threshold to discuss patients, and the adherence to the PJI treatment protocol has improved steadily. Complicated cases are discussed between colleagues from collaborating centers. The collaboration has been perceived as very successful by the participating hospitals. Since 2015, over 300 patients have been included, of whom 52% were male. In 26%, PJI occurred after revision surgery. Staphylococcus aureus was involved in 25% of cases, coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 23%, Streptococci in 13% and Gram-negative micro-organisms in 15%. Conclusions. In this project, collaboration between different medical specialties through multidisciplinary meetings was the key to the improvement of patient care The regional collaborative project led to the implementation of a uniform treatment protocol for PJI. With this prospective project we aim to improve patient care by providing evidence for optimal antibiotic and surgical strategies for PJI. Ideally, countries should have hospital networks and a uniform method of data collection to make it easy to share data for scientific research

Current fracture-clinic models, especially in the advent of reductions in junior doctors hours, may limit outpatient trainee education and patient care. We designed a new model of fracture-clinic, involving an initial consultant led case review focused on patient management and trainee education. Prospective outcomes for all new patients attending the redesigned fracture-clinic over a 3-week period in 2010 (n=240) were compared with the traditional clinic in the same period in 2009(n=296). Trainees attending the fracture clinic completed a Likert questionnaire (1 [strongly dissagree] − 5 [strongly agree]) assessing the adequacy of education, support, staff morale & standards of patient care. The percentage of cases given consultant input increased significantly from 33% in 2009 to 84% in 2010 (p< 0.0001), while the proportion of patients requiring physical review by a consultant fell by 21% (p< 0.0001). Return rates were reduced by 14.3% (p< 0.013) & utilization of the nurse lead fracture clinic improved by 10.1% (p< 0.0028). These improvements were most marked in the target group ?StR2 (24.2% & 22.3% respectively). There were significant improvements in staff perception of their education from 2 to 4.75 (p< 0.0001), provision of senior support from 2.38 to 4.5 (p=0.019), morale from 3.68 to 4.13 (p=0.0331) & their overall perception of patient care from 3.25 to 4.5 (p=0.0016). A&E staff found the new style clinic educational, practice changing & that it improved interdisciplinary relations, but did not interfere with their A&E duties. Our model of fracture-clinic redesign has significantly enhanced consultant input into patient care without additional funding. In addition, we have demonstrated increased service efficiency and significant improvements in staff support, morale and education. In the face of current economic and training challenges, we recommend this new model as a tool for enhancing patient and trainee experiences

Purpose. Introduce an Integrated Approach for Orthopedic-Sports Medicine Practice and Patient Care Management that. Is built around effective and efficient surgical techniques, and patient care management processes. Integrates Operations and Service Excellence best practices with patient care management processes. Integrates orthopedic care delivery between outpatient clinic, pre-surgery, surgery, inpatient, (acute care) and post acute care settings. Delivers exceptional clinical, patient satisfaction and financial outcomes as validated by independent national healthcare benchmarking organization. Helps position Ortho-Sports medicine services for strategic growth. Is replicable to develop Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence. Presentation illustrates the ‘Ten Elements’ approach to implement the Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence and demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach with an outcomes study from over 1000 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. During the presentation, the speakers would share the key clinical, patient satisfaction, and financial outcomes achieved by the implementation of the best practices defined in our ‘Ten Elements’ approach. All performance data elements are collected, validated and analyzed by an independent third party, national healthcare benchmarking company. During the presentation Dr. Bramlett would elaborate on the surgical protocol, and the key differentiating steps in procedure technique from traditional approach that significantly enhances procedure effectiveness, efficiency and lowers the patient complication rate as demonstrated by benchmarking data. Speakers would further present the key elements of Total Knee Arthoplasty procedure that focus on patient education, patient participation in pre-surgical weight loss and pre-habilitation program, anesthesia approach, avoiding tourniquet use and deep veen thrombosis (DVT) risk reduction, early post operative patient ambulation and weight bearing, and post operative patient management approach. On average the ortho-sports medicine clinical of Alabama TKA patients are disharged from the hospital in 2.6 days, and experience 65 percent less complications than expected for a similar patient population and assume early control of their independent functionality

Background. Benefits of day case foot and ankle surgery includes reduced hospital stay, associated cost savings for the hospital, high patient satisfaction and quicker recovery with no increase in complication rates. In 2007, we set up the preoperative foot and ankle group. Patients were seen three weeks before surgery by a specialist nurse, physiotherapist and a preoperative evaluation is done. The therapist explains the patient's weightbearing status and advices on how to carry this out. Our aim was to reduce inpatient hospital stay and increase our day case procedures. Methods. We evaluated length of stay and physiotherapy intervention for all our patients during the first three months of 2007 to 2011. Mean length of stay was calculated and Mann-Whitney U test was performed using median. Results. Mean length of stay for combined forefoot and midfoot group reduced by 1.92 days and median reduction was statistically significant(p< 0.01). For forefoot surgery alone, the mean length reduced by 2.14 and median reduction was significant(p< 0.001) and for midfoot surgery alone, the mean stay reduced by 1.34 days and median was significant (p< 0.001). Hind foot patient's mean length of stay reduced by 6.78 days and the median was significant (p< 0.001). But for the ankle group the mean length of stay did reduce but the median was not statistically significant (p=0.225). Day case surgery increased by 43.5% for forefoot, 23.2% for midfoot and 14% for ankle surgeries but not for hindfoot. Conclusions. The overall results show that the preoperative foot and ankle group has resulted in reduction of inpatient stay and increase in daycase surgery performed. A pre-operative group is a highly efficient method of enhancing patient care and improving length of stay at the hospital for the patient. The cost saving for the hospital is around £35,400 per annum

Aim. A new multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway, based on national BOA and NICE guidance, was introduced in our institution to facilitate rapid preoperative medical optimisation and early surgery for patients with hip fractures. The aim of this audit was to assess its impact on patient care and outcomes. Method. A prospective audit of 161 patients admitted with a fractured neck of femur was conducted in the six months before (92 patients) and after (69 patients) implementation of the new pathway. Data included: time to orthogeriatric assessment (TtG); time to surgery (TtS); length of hospital stay (LOS); return to original accommodation; and inpatient mortality rate. Significance was tested using Chi Squared, Fisher's exact and unpaired Student t-Tests. Results. The two groups of patients were equivalent in terms of age, male:female ratio, ASA grade and preoperative AMTS. In the six months after the introduction of the pathway, 85% of patients received a pre-operative medical assessment compared to 19% before (p=0.0001). Average TtG dropped from 91 to 19 hours (p=0.0001). LOS dropped from 24.8 days to 19.5 days (p=0.029). Furthermore, a significant reduction in mortality of 10% (14% before, 4% after, p=0.0336) was found, with an increase in the proportion of patients returning to their original place of accommodation (57% before, 80% after, p=0.0069). Whilst limited by theatre scheduling, there was an observed reduction in TtS of 6 hours (37 vs 31, p=0.0663). Conclusions. Rapid medical optimisation and prompt surgery can significantly reduce length of stay and inpatient mortality of patients with hip fractures. This is especially important in light of their often fragile physiological state and complex co-morbidities. Successful implementation of a multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway can increase the return of patients to their preoperative accommodation, thus maintaining their level of pre-morbid independence and potentially leading to significant future cost savings

Alignment and soft tissue balance are two of the most important factors that influence early and long term outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Current clinical practice involves the use of plain radiographs for preoperative planning and conventional instrumentation for intra operative alignment.

The aim of this study is to assess the Signature^TM Personalised system using patient specific guides developed from MRI. The Signature^TM system is used with the Vanguard^RComplete Knee System. This system is compared with conventional instrumentation and computer assisted navigation with the Vanguard system.

Patients were randomised into 3 groups of 50 to either Conventional Instumented Knee, Computer Navigation Assisted Knee Arthroplasty or Signature Personalised Knee Arthoplasty. All patients had the Vanguard Total knee Arthroplasty Implanted.

All patients underwent Long leg X-rays and CT Scans to measure Alignment at pre-op and 6 months post-op. All patients had clinical review and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 1 year post surgery was used to measure the outcome.

A complete dataset was obtained for 124 patients. There were significant differences in alignment on Long leg films ot of CT scan with perth protocol. Notably the Signature group had the smallest spread of outliers.

In conclusion the Signature knee system compares well in comparison with traditional instrumentation and CAS Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This study aims to assess the impact of re-configuration on provision of trauma care at Hospital A, in particular management of hip fractures.

Originally, Hospitals A and B both provided trauma and elective orthopaedic services. These services are undergoing re-configuration such that Hospital A will provide an elective orthopaedic service while Hospital B will provide an orthopaedic trauma service.

Two time periods, one prior to reconfiguration (time period 1) and one after reconfiguration (time period 2) were identified. All trauma patients presenting to Hospital A requiring surgery during the defined time periods were included.

During time period 1, 197 patients requiring surgery presented to Hospital A, 70 with hip fractures. During time period 2, 149 patients requiring surgery presented to Hospital A, 55 with hip fractures.

As part of the reconfiguration process, there was a reduction in dedicated trauma operating capacity at Hospital A with no equivalent increase in operating capacity at Hospital B.

During time period 1, 70% of patients with hip fractures were operated on within 36 hours, compared to 44% during time period 2.

During the re-configuration process, there was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of patients with hip fractures meeting the recommended standards of care.

Introduction

Superficial wound complications can occur in up to 10% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients and have been associated with deep infection. The ideal material for TKA closure should fulfill the following requirements: 1) fast intraoperative application, 2) minimal wound complications and discomfort, and 3) can be removed by patients without a home care visit. We present our experience with a novel, non-invasive, removable skin closure system compared to conventional staple closure.

Aims. COVID-19-related patient care delays have resulted in an unprecedented patient care backlog in the field of orthopaedics. The objective of this study is to examine orthopaedic provider preferences regarding the patient care backlog and financial recovery initiatives in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. An orthopaedic research consortium at a multi-hospital tertiary care academic medical system developed a three-part survey examining provider perspectives on strategies to expand orthopaedic patient care and financial recovery. Section 1 asked for preferences regarding extending clinic hours, section 2 assessed surgeon opinions on expanding surgical opportunities, and section 3 questioned preferred strategies for departmental financial recovery. The survey was sent to the institution’s surgical and nonoperative orthopaedic providers. Results. In all, 73 of 75 operative (n = 55) and nonoperative (n = 18) providers responded to the survey. A total of 92% of orthopaedic providers (n = 67) were willing to extend clinic hours. Most providers preferred extending clinic schedule until 6pm on weekdays. When asked about extending surgical block hours, 96% of the surgeons (n = 53) were willing to extend operating room (OR) block times. Most surgeons preferred block times to be extended until 7pm (63.6%, n = 35). A majority of surgeons (53%, n = 29) believe that over 50% of their surgical cases could be performed at an ambulatory surgery centre (ASC). Of the strategies to address departmental financial deficits, 85% of providers (n = 72) were willing to work extra hours without a pay cut. Conclusion. Most orthopaedic providers are willing to help with patient care backlogs and revenue recovery by working extended hours instead of having their pay reduced. These findings provide insights that can be incorporated into COVID-19 recovery strategies. Level of Evidence: III. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):562–568

Aims. The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature. Methods. A bibliometric search of journals’ online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO). Results. Of the 7,201 papers reviewed, 136 included qualitative methods (0.1%). There was no significant difference between the journals, apart from Bone & Joint Open, which included 21 studies using qualitative methods, equalling 4% of its published articles. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that there is a very low number of qualitative research papers published within trauma and orthopaedic journals. Given the increasing focus on patient outcomes and improving the patient experience, it may be argued that there is a requirement to support both quantitative and qualitative approaches to orthopaedic research. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods may effectively address the complex and personal aspects of patients’ care, ensuring that outcomes align with patient values and enhance overall care quality

It has been established that a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) provides significant clinical and organizational benefits to the management of trauma patients. After-hours care is associated with surgeon fatigue, a high risk of patient complications, and increased costs related to staffing. However, hesitation due to concerns of the associated opportunity cost at the hospital leadership level is a major barrier to wide-spread adoption. The primary aim of this study is to determine the impact of dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) implementation on operating room efficiency. Secondly, we sought to evaluate the associated financial impact of the DOTR, with respect to both after-hours care costs as well as the opportunity cost of displaced elective cases. This was a retrospective cost-analysis study performed at a single academic-affiliated community hospital in Toronto, Canada. All patients that underwent the most frequently performed orthopedic trauma procedures (hip hemiarthroplasty, open reduction internal fixation of the ankle, femur, elbow and distal radius), over a four-year period from 2016-2019 were included. Patient data acquired for two-years prior and two-years after the implementation of a DOTR were compared, adjusting for the number of cases performed. Surgical duration and number of day-time and after-hours cases was recorded pre- and post-implementation. Cost savings of performing trauma cases during daytime and the opportunity cost of displacing elective cases by performing cases during the day was calculated. A sensitivity analysis accounting for varying overtime costs and hospital elective case profit was also performed. 1960 orthopaedic cases were examined pre- and post-DOTR. All procedures had reduced total operative time post-DOTR. After accounting for the total number of each procedure performed, the mean weighted reduction was 31.4% and the mean time saved was 29.6 minutes per surgery. The number of daytime surgical hours increased 21%, while nighttime hours decreased by 37.8%. Overtime staffing costs were reduced by $24,976 alongside increase in opportunity costs of $22,500. This resulted in a net profit of $2,476. Our results support the premise that DOTRs improve operating room efficiency and can be cost efficient. Through the regular scheduling of a DOTR at a single hospital in Canada, the number of surgeries occurring during daytime hours increased while the number of after-hours cases decreased. The same surgeries were also completed nearly one-third faster (30 minutes per case) on average. Our study also specifically addresses the hesitation regarding potential loss of profit from elective surgeries. Notably, the savings partially stem from decreased OR time as well as decreased nurse overtime. Widespread implementation can improve patient care while still remaining financially favourable

Aims. This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative complications in COVID-19-positive patients undergoing common orthopaedic procedures. Methods. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent common orthopaedic surgery procedures from 1 January to 31 December 2021 were extracted. Patient preoperative COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching was conducted between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. Multivariable regression was then performed to identify both patient and provider risk factors independently associated with the occurrence of 30-day postoperative adverse events. Results. Of 194,121 included patients, 740 (0.38%) were identified to be COVID-19-positive. Comparison of comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of diabetes, heart failure, and pulmonary disease. After propensity matching and controlling for all preoperative variables, multivariable analysis found that COVID-19-positive patients were at increased risk of several postoperative complications, including: any adverse event, major adverse event, minor adverse event, death, venous thromboembolism, and pneumonia. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery were at increased risk of 30-day adverse events. Conclusion. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery had increased odds of many 30-day postoperative complications, with hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery being the most high-risk procedures. These data reinforce prior literature demonstrating increased risk of venous thromboembolic events in the acute postoperative period. Clinicians caring for patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures should be mindful of these increased risks, and attempt to improve patient care during the ongoing global pandemic. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):704–712

Aims. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the highest level of evidence used to inform patient care. However, it has been suggested that the quality of randomization in RCTs in orthopaedic surgery may be low. This study aims to describe the quality of randomization in trials included in systematic reviews in orthopaedic surgery. Methods. Systematic reviews of RCTs testing orthopaedic procedures published in 2022 were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A random sample of 100 systematic reviews was selected, and all included RCTs were retrieved. To be eligible for inclusion, systematic reviews must have tested an orthopaedic procedure as the primary intervention, included at least one study identified as a RCT, been published in 2022 in English, and included human clinical trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 Tool was used to assess random sequence generation as ‘adequate’, ‘inadequate’, or ‘no information’; we then calculated the proportion of trials in each category. We also collected data to test the association between these categories and characteristics of the RCTs and systematic reviews. Results. We included 917 unique RCTs. We found that 374 RCTs (40.8%) reported adequate sequence generation, 61 (6.7%) were inadequate, 410 (44.7%) lacked information, and 72 (7.9%) were observational studies incorrectly included as RCTs within the systematic review. Publication year, an author with statistical or epidemiological qualifications, and journal impact factor were each associated with adequate randomization. We found that 45 systematic reviews (45%) included at least one inadequately randomized RCT or an observational study incorrectly treated as a RCT. Conclusion. There is evidence of a lack of random allocation in RCTs included in systematic reviews in orthopaedic surgery. The conduct of RCTs and systematic reviews should be improved to minimize the risk of bias from inadequate randomization in RCTs and mislabelling of non-randomized studies as RCTs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1072–1080

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

Introduction. The FitBone lengthening nail (Orthofix UK) is an intramedullary device licensed for the lengthening of long bones in adults in the UK. It contains a motor powered by electricity transmitted via an induction coil placed underneath the skin. It was developed in Germany two decades ago but uptake in the UK has only started more recently. The aim of this study was to review the first cohort of FitBone lengthening nails in a unit with significant experience of other lengthening nails (including PRECICE and Stryde). Materials & Methods. Demographic, clinical and radiological data was prospectively collected on all FitBone cases starting in February 2022. Accuracy of lengthening rate, patient satisfaction and implant issues were all considered. Complications and learning points were recorded and discussed by the multidisciplinary team involved in the patients care. Results. Eleven lengthening nails were inserted between February and November 2022 (6 right femurs, 5 left femurs). The average patient age was 31 (16–57) with 4 females and 7 males. The average lengthening achieved was 44mm (13– 70) over an average of 59 days (35 to 104). Significant technical issues were encountered in this cohort of patients including slow opening up at osteotomy site (3 requiring speeding up of programme), early consolidation (one requiring re-do osteotomy) and backing out of locking screws (3 out of 11 nails). There were also patient use concerns with difficulty using the motor and the inability to reverse the lengthening without an additional component to the motor. Conclusions. We present the first UK cohort of patients with femoral lengthening using the FitBone implant and device. We highlight the technical and patient issues encountered during this learning curve and propose solutions to avoid these pitfalls

Polyethylene wear represents a significant risk factor for the long-term success of knee arthroplasty [1]. This work aimed to develop and in vivo validate an automated algorithm for accurate and precise AI based wear measurement in knee arthroplasty using clinical AP radiographs for scientifically meaningful multi-centre studies. Twenty postoperative radiographs (knee joint AP in standing position) after knee arthroplasty were analysed using the novel algorithm. A convolutional neural network-based segmentation is used to localize the implant components on the X-Ray, and a 2D-3D registration of the CAD implant models precisely calculates the three-dimensional position and orientation of the implants in the joint at the time of acquisition. From this, the minimal distance between the involved implant components is determined, and its postoperative change over time enables the determination of wear in the radiographs. The measured minimum inlay height of 335 unloaded inlays excluding the weight-induced deformation, served as ground truth for validation and was compared to the algorithmically calculated component distances from 20 radiographs. With an average weight of 94 kg in the studied TKA patient cohort, it was determined that an average inlay height of 6.160 mm is expected in the patient. Based on the radiographs, the algorithm calculated a minimum component distance of 6.158 mm (SD = 81 µm), which deviated by 2 µm in comparison to the expected inlay height. An automated method was presented that allows accurate and precise determination of the inlay height and subsequently the wear in knee arthroplasty based on a clinical radiograph and the CAD models. Precision and accuracy are comparable to the current gold standard RSA [2], but without relying on special radiographic setups. The developed method can therefore be used to objectively investigate novel implant materials with meaningful clinical cohorts, thus improving the quality of patient care

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the reasons for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revisions at a tertiary hospital over a four-year period. The study aimed to identify the primary causes of TKA revisions and shed light on the implications for patient care and outcomes. The study included 31 patients who underwent revisions after primary knee arthroplasty between January 2017 and December 2020. A retrospective approach was employed, utilizing medical records and radiological findings to identify the reasons for TKA revisions. The study excluded oncology patients to focus on non-oncologic indications for revision surgeries. Patient demographics, including age and gender, were recorded. Data analysis involved categorizing the reasons for revision based on clinical assessments and radiological evidence. Among the 31 patients included in the study, 9 were males and 22 were females. The age of the patients ranged from 43 to 81, with a median age of 65 and an interquartile range of 18.5. The primary reasons for TKA revisions were identified as aseptic loosening (10 cases) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (13 cases). Additional reasons included revision from surgitech hemicap (1 case), patella osteoarthritis (1 case), stiffness (2 cases), patella maltracking (2 cases), periprosthetic fracture (1 case), and patella resurfacing (1 case). The findings of this retrospective cohort study highlight aseptic loosening and PJI as the leading causes of TKA revisions in the examined patient population. These results emphasize the importance of optimizing surgical techniques, implant selection, and infection control measures to reduce the incidence of TKA revisions. Future research efforts should focus on preventive strategies to enhance patient outcomes and mitigate the need for revision surgeries in TKA procedures

Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

Objectives. Open fracture classification systems are limited in their use. Our objective was to classify open tibia and femur fractures using the OTS classification system in a region with high incidence of gunshot fractures. One hundred and thirty-seven patients with diaphyseal tibia and femur open fractures were identified from a prospectively collected cohort of patients. This database contained all cases (closed and open fractures) of tibial and femoral intramedullary nailed patients older than 18 years old during the period of September 2017 to May 2021. Exclusion criteria included closed fractures, non-viable limbs, open fractures > 48 hours to first surgical debridement and patients unable to follow up over a period of 12 months (a total of 24). Open fractures captured and classified in the HOST study using the Gustilo-Anderson classification, were reviewed and reclassified using the OTS open fracture classification system, analysing gunshot fractures in particular. Ninety percent were males with a mean age of 34. Most common mechanism was civilian gunshot wounds (gsw) in 54.7% of cases. In 52.6% of cases soft tissue management was healing via secondary intention, these not encompassed in the classification. Fracture classification was OTS Simple in 23.4%, Complex B in 24.1% and 52.6% of cases unclassified. The OTS classification system was not comprehensive in the classification of open tibia and femur fractures in a setting of high incidence of gunshot fractures. An amendment has been proposed to alter acute management to appropriate wound care and to subcategorise Simple into A and B subdivisions; no soft tissue intervention and primary closure respectively. This will render the OTS classification system more inclusive to all open fractures of all causes with the potential to better guide patient care and clinical research