Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 1, Issue 7 | Pages 152 - 157
1 Jul 2012
Hamilton DF Gatherer D Jenkins PJ Maclean JGB Hutchison JD Nutton RW Simpson AHRW

Objectives

To evaluate the neck strength of school-aged rugby players, and to define the relationship with proxy physical measures with a view to predicting neck strength.

Methods

Cross-sectional cohort study involving 382 rugby playing schoolchildren at three Scottish schools (all male, aged between 12 and 18 years). Outcome measures included maximal isometric neck extension, weight, height, grip strength, cervical range of movement and neck circumference.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 32 - 32
1 Feb 2016
Deane J McGregor A
Full Access

Purpose and Background:. Clinical interpretations of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease are not described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to establish a consensus of expert clinical opinion in order to fuel further research. Methods:. A reliable and valid electronic survey was designed to include theoretical constructs relating to training and education, general knowledge, assessment and management practices. Clinicians from the Society of Back Pain Research U.K. were invited to take part. Quantitative data was collated and coded using Bristol on-line survey software, and content analysis was used to systematically code and categorize qualitative data. Results:. Respondents represented a wide range of clinical specialties. The majority graduated in the U.K. (87%), were clinically active and had greater than 9 years postgraduate clinical experience (84%). MRI (36%) and physical assessment (21%) were cited as the most important clinical assessment tools. Reduction in disc height (92%) and disc dehydration (90%) were reported as the most important variables with respect to DLDD diagnosis. The most effective treatment approaches varied from education and reassurance, pain management, cognitive behavioural approaches to core stability training and group activity. Health professionals viewed the future of care advancement in terms of improvements in patient communication (35%) and education (38%). Treatment stratification (24%) and advancing evidence based management practices through research were also regarded as essential (27%). Conclusion:. Spinal clinical experts have clear views on DLDD assessment. In terms of management the results are varied suggesting inconsistency and uncertainty