Constrained implants with intra-medullary fixation are expedient for complex TKA. Constraint is associated with loosening, but can correction of deformity mitigate risk of loosening?. Primary TKA's with a non-linked constrained prosthesis from 2010-2018 were identified. Indications were ligamentous instability or intra-medullary fixation to bypass stress risers. All included fully cemented 30mm stem extensions on tibia and femur. If soft tissue stability was achieved, a posterior stabilized (PS) tibial insert was selected. Pre and post TKA full length radiographs showed. i. hip-knee-ankle angles (HKAA). ii. Kennedy Zone (KZ) where hip to ankle vector crosses knee joint. 77 TKA's in 68 patients, average age 69.3 years (41-89.5) with OA (65%) post-trauma (24.5%) and inflammatory arthropathy (10.5%). Pre-op radiographs (62 knees) showed varus in 37.0%. (HKAA: 4. o. -29. o. ), valgus in 59.6% (HKAA range 8. o. -41. o. ) and 2 knees in neutral. 13 cases deceased within 2 years were excluded. Six with 2 year follow up pending have not been revised. Mean follow-up is 6.1 yrs (2.4-11.9yrs). Long post-op radiographs showed 34 (57.6%) in central KZ (HKKA 180. o. +/- 2. o. ). . Thirteen (22.0%) were in mechanical varus (HKAA 3. o. -15. o. ) and 12 (20.3%) in mechanical valgus: HKAA (171. o. -178. o. ). Three failed with infection; 2 after ORIF and one with BMI>50. The greatest post op varus suffered peri-prosthetic fracture. There was no aseptic loosening or instability. Only full-length radiographs accurately measure alignment and very few similar studies exist. No cases failed by loosening or instability, but PPF followed persistent malalignment. Infection complicated prior ORIF and elevated BMI. This does not endorse indiscriminate use of mechanically constrained knee prostheses. Lower demand patients with complex arthropathy, especially severe deformity, benefit from fully cemented, non-linked constrained prostheses, with intra-medullary fixation. Hinges are not necessarily indicated, and rotational constraint does not lead to loosening

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 25 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society for Anaesthesiology score. There was no significant difference in their preoperative range of motion (ROM) (104º±20º vs. 102º±20º,p=0.80), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (27±6 vs. 26±7,p=0.72), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (52±24 vs. 56±24,p=0.62). The preoperative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (44±14 vs. 54 ± 18,p<0.05). At 3-months postoperation, the PS group had significantly better OKS (38±6 vs. 36±6,p=0.02) but similar ROM (111º±14º vs. 108º±12º,p=0.25), KS-FS (73±20 vs. 68±23, p=0.32) and KS-KS (87±10 vs. 86±9,p=0.26). At 12-months postoperation, both groups had similar ROM (115º±13º vs. 115º±11º,p=0.99), OKS (41±5 vs. 40±5,p=0.45), KS-FS (74±22vs.78±17,p=0.80), and KS-KS (89±10vs.89±11,p=0.75). There was statistically significant improvement in all parameters at 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p<0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p≥0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p<0.05). The MC provides stability in the medial compartment while allowing a degree of freedom in the lateral compartment. Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. In conclusion, compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation

Object. Although single-radius designs have theoretical advantages in some aspects, there has been a paucity of evaluation studies. The purpose of this study was to compare 10-year clinical, radiological, survivorship outcomes of single radius and multi radius posterior stabilized prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty(TKA) with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method. In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed 240 patients (240 knees) with RA who underwent TKA between Oct 2005 and Dec 2007: SR group (120 patients, 120 knees, Stryker Scorpio NRG) and MR group (120 patients, 120 knees, Depuy sigma RP). A 1 : 1 matched case control study was conducted in two groups which were similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, ASA classification and operation team. Mean follow-up periods were 10.73±1.13 (range: 8–13) years and 10.82±1.09 (range: 7–13) years. Results. In SR group, the mean HSS score improved significantly from 38.63±8.76 to 87.67±6.62, the mean VAS score decreased significantly from 7.37±0.24 to 0.45±0.12. the mean range of motion improved significantly from 105.52°±7.78°to 124.32°±8.12° (p<0.001). In MR group, the mean HSS score improved significantly from 38.75±8.34 to 89.29±5.21, the mean VAS score decreased significantly from 7.62±0.26 to 0.33±0.10. the mean range of motion improved significantly from 104.18°±7.62° to 122.52°±8.03°(p<0.001). (See Figure 1) Clinical and functional improvements had no significant differences between the two groups. 6 complications were noted in SR group, including 2 cases of prosthetic loosening, 1 case of periprosthetic osteolysis, 3 cases of periprosthetic bright lines.6 complications were noted in MR group, including 2 cases of prosthetic loosening and 4 cases of periprosthetic bright lines. No case of infection was observed in two groups. Survivorship using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.8–98.3%) for the SR at 10 years and 98.3% (95% CI: 97.3–99.5%) for the MR group at 10 years, with no significant difference (p=0.755). (See Figure 2). Conclusion. This study suggested that both single-radius and multi-radius posterior stabilized prostheses can lead to satisfactory outcomes for clinical function, radiological evaluation and survivorship among RA patients undergoing TKA, and no significantly clinical differences was shown in two types of prostheses

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3 degrees of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilise both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabiliser of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA

Background:. We studied the effect of posterior condylar offset on maximum knee flexion after a posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. We also looked at gender difference and the post-operative change in posterior condylar offset. Methods:. Eighty consecutive computer navigated posterior stabilised total knee replacements were prospectively assessed intra-operatively for maximum knee flexion. The flexion angle was measured and recorded with an imageless computer navigation system (Brainlab) before and after implantation of the prosthesis. This was correlated with a radiological review of the posterior condylar offset pre- and post-operatively, as defined by posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) originally described by Soda (2007) and modified by the Bristol Knee Group (2010). Results:. No relationship could be found between change in posterior femoral offset ratio and the change in knee flexion before and after implantation of the prosthesis (p = 0.46.)This was especially true for female subjects (p = 0.87.)For male patients there was a trend towards an inverse relationship demonstrating decreasing flexion with an increase in PCOR (p = 0.16.) PCOR increased in 91 % of cases and overall increased from an average of 0.44 pre-operatively to 0.49 post-operatively. The increase in PCOR was smaller where a large pre-operative PCOR was present (p = 0.0006.)Pre-operative flexion correlated significantly with postoperative flexion (p = 0.00.)There was no difference in PCOR between male and female patients. Conclusion:. Knee flexion is not influenced by a change in posterior condylar offset in posterior stabilised knees. The increase in posterior condylar offset with a posterior stabilised TKA could by explained a larger increase in the flexion gap than in the extension gap, when sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament. The PCOR increases in cases with smaller pre-operative posterior condylar offset. Pre-operative flexion is a significant predictor of postoperative flexion

Introduction. Increasingly young and active patients are concerned about revision arthroplasty forcing the manufacturers to think about revision prostheses that fit to this population while meeting the indications and fitting with bone losses and ligament deficiencies. One of those industrials claims that its system allows the surgeon to rise the constraint from a posterior stabilized (PS) prostheses to a semi-constraint total stabilized (TS) prostheses without modifying the gait pattern thanks to a similar single radius design. The aim of the study was to compare gait parameters in patients receiving either PS or TS knee prostheses. Methods. Nineteen patients in each groups were prospectively collected for this study and compared between each other. All subjects were assessed with a 3D knee kinematics analysis, performed with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®). Were measured for each knees range of motion (ROM) in flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, internal–external rotation and anterior–posterior displacement. Results. There were no significant kinematic differences between PS and TS groups. The ROM in flexion-extension was 44° in PS group vs 46° in TS group, the ROM in internal-external rotation was 5.5° in PS group vs 4°in TS group. Peak varus angle during loading was equal (2.5°) and higher in PS group during swing phases (5.5° vs 3.7°) without any significancy. There appeared to be less antero-posterior translation in the TS group (maximum posterior displacement of −1 mm vs −5 mm) linked to the larger central post-cam without any significancy. Conclusion. TS designed have comparable gait parameters than PS prostheses. Its use won't prejudice the patient concerning the walking pattern

Purpose. Two-stage re-implantation after infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), remains the gold standard to which other forms of treatment should be compared. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rates of failure and functional outcome of two stage revision TKA for treatment of infection comparing cemented posterior stabilized compared to constrained condylar implants. Method. The study group included 25 consecutive patients who had two stage revision TKA to treat infection with an average follow up of 3.25 1.5 years (range 2–6). In all patients the diagnosis of infection was made using standard serum parameters as well as aspiration for joint fluid analysis. Eight patients had posterior stabilized TKAs and 17 patients with had constrained condylar TKAs. Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Knee Scores (KSKS) at each follow-up visit as well as a detailed record of any difficulties or complications. Results. No patient (8/8) in the LPS posterior stabilized group and 16 of 17 (94.1%) patients in the LCCK constrained condylar group, had any complaint indicative of instability. Two patients (8%) had re-infection (1 in each group). There was no significant difference between the knee scores (p=0.64) and function scores (p=0.38) of the LPS posterior stabilized and LCCK constrained condylar groups at latest follow up. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the strategy of using the least constrained implants that provide adequate stability as judged intra-operatively is appropriate also in 2 stage revision TKAs for infection

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3 degrees of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilise both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are required less frequently. They are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabiliser of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA

Background:. The safety implications of achieving high flexion after TKA and the use of high flexion prostheses remain issues of concern. It is possible that different designs have different clinical and radiological results and complications, such as, early aseptic loosening. However, little information is available on the clinical results of TKAs performed using single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design. Accordingly, this study was undertaken to document results of single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized TKAs with minimum 7-year follow-up. Methods:. From April 2003 to February 2006, 308 patients (455 knees) underwent TKA using single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design and among those patients, 251 patients (388 knees) included in this study who were able to be followed up for a minimum 7 year. Clinical results were evaluated using Knee Society Knee scores (KSKS) and Knee Society Function scores (KSFS) at last follow-up. The passive knee flexion was measured using a goniometer before and after surgery. The survival rate of the implants and implant-specific complications such as osteolysis or loosening were investigated. The osteolysis or loosening around the components was recorded according to the Knee Society Radiological scoring System. Results:. Mean Knee Society Knee score improved from 48.2 preoperatively to 96.8 postoperatively and mean Function score improved from 49.7 preoperatively to 74.2 postoperatively, respectively. The average range of motion (ROM) improved from 112.7° preoperatively to 131.5° postoperatively. Postoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was within −3° to 3°, in 316 knees (81.4%). Non-progressive osteolysis was observed at zone 4 of the femoral component in eight knees (2.06%), at zone 3 of the tibial component in one knee (0.26%), at zone 2 of the tibial component in two knees (0.52%), and at zone 1 of the tibial component in thirteen knees (3.35%) in anteroposterior view. Two cases were revised due to infection and recurrent hemarthrosis. However, no complications, like early aseptic loosening, that have been associated with high flexion designs were observed. Conclusions:. Clinical results for TKAs conducted using a single-radius, high-flex posterior stabilized design with a minimum 7-year follow-up were favorable. Furthermore, no high flexion implant-specific complications such as early aseptic loosening were encountered

Introduction. Robotics have been applied to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical precision in component placement and joint function restoration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prosthetic component alignment in robotic arm-assisted (RA)-TKA performed with functional alignment and intraoperative fine-tuning, aiming for symmetric medial and lateral gaps in flexion/extension. It was hypothesized that functionally aligned RA-TKA the femoral and tibial cuts would be performed in line with the preoperative joint line orientation. Methods. Between September 2018 and January 2020, 81 RA cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs were performed at a single center. Preoperative radiographs were obtained, and measures were performed according to Paley's. Preoperatively, cuts were planned based on radiographic epiphyseal anatomies and respecting ±3° boundaries from neutral coronal alignment. Intraoperatively, the tibial and femoral cuts were modified based on the individual soft tissue-guided fine-tuning, aiming for symmetric medial and lateral gaps in flexion/extension. Robotic data were recorded. Results. A total of 56 RA-TKAs performed on varus knees were taken into account. On average, the tibial component was placed at 1.9° varus (SD 0.7) and 3.3° (SD 1.0) in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. The average femoral component alignment, based on the soft tissue tensioning with spoons, resulted as follows: 0.7° varus (SD 1.7) in the coronal plane and 1.8° (SD 2.1) of external rotation relative to surgical transepicondylar axis in the transverse plane. A statistically significant linear direct relationship was demonstrated between radiographic epiphyseal femoral and tibial coronal alignment and femoral (r=0.3, p<0.05) and tibial (r=0.3, p<0.01) coronal cuts, resepctively. Conclusion. Functionally aligned RA-TKA performed in varus knees, aiming for ligaments’ preservation and balanced flexion/extension gaps, provided joint line respecting femoral and tibial cuts on the coronal plane

The goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to relieve pain, restore function, and provide a stable joint. In regard to types of implants, the workhorses are posterior cruciate retaining (CR), posterior stabilised (PS), and posterior stabilised constrained (PSC) designs. However, the continuum of constraint now ranges from standard cruciate retaining (CR-S) to CR lipped (CR-L), to anterior stabilised (CR-AS), to posterior stabilised, to a PS “plus” that fits with a PS femoral component but provides a small degree of varus-valgus constraint, to a PSC or constrained condylar type of device, to a rotating hinge. As the degree of deformity, bone loss, contracture, ligamentous instability and osteopenia increases, so does the demand for prosthetic constraint. When deformity is minimal and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is intact and functional, a CR-S device is appropriate. For moderate deformity with deficiency or compromise of the PCL, a CR-AS or posterior stabilised device is warranted. In severe cases, with attenuation or absence of either of the collateral ligaments, a constrained condylar device, with options of stems, wedges and augments, is advisable. In salvage situations, when both collaterals are compromised, a rotating hinge should be utilised. Prerequisites for use of a CR-S device are an intact PCL, balanced medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and equal flexion and extension gaps. With a CR-L bearing, a slight posterior lip is incorporated into the sagittal profile of the component to provide a small amount of extra stability in the articulation. It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the design features of the implant system he or she is using. For example, in a system where the CR-S bearing has 3° of posterior slope and the CR-L bearing has no slope, the thickness of a CR-L bearing posteriorly is approximately 2 mm greater than the CR-S. A CR-L bearing is indicated for to provide stability where the flexion gap is just slightly looser than the extension gap and the PCL is intact. If the patient's knee is somewhat lax in flexion and stable in extension, a CR-L bearing may help to stabilize both the flexion and extension gaps yet still allow the knee to obtain full extension, whereas if a CR-S bearing in the next thicker size is used to stabilise the flexion gap, a flexion contracture may result. CR-AS bearings are required less frequently. They are indicated when the flexion and extension gaps are balanced, but the PCL is deficient, and the surgeon does not want to change to a PS design, which requires additional bony resection of intercondylar notch. The PCL is one of the strongest ligaments in the knee, and affords inherent stability to the TKA. In flexion, the PCL not only affords AP stability, but also imparts flexion gap stability, acting as a lateral stabilizer of the medial compartment and a medial stabiliser of the lateral compartment. The PCL has a crucial role with respect to femoral rollback, which imparts added efficiency to the extensor mechanism. PCL retention is a more biologically preserving operative intervention than PS-TKA

Bicruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty preserves all of the ligaments of the knee while still addressing the ligament balance and the flexion-extension gaps. The concept of cruciate ligament preservation is not new and both Townley and Cartier designed prostheses in the late 1980s that did preserve all of the ligaments. Their results were quite acceptable for that time in knee replacement surgery but the posterior stabilised and cruciate retaining designs controlled most of the market. The surgical technique for cruciate ligament preservation was more difficult, and without clear clinical benefit, most surgeons gravitated towards the cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised designs. In the late 1990s, evaluation of the total knee arthroplasty began to assess knee kinematics in addition to pain and functional outcomes. At the same time, studies on the unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrated impressive scores in motion and patient satisfaction with preservation of all of the ligamentous structures of the knee. Over the past two years, new designs that preserve all of the ligaments of the knee have returned to the market. The instruments have been improved and the prostheses have been changed to respect the kinematics of the knee. Fifteen to twenty percent of all total knee replacement patients are not completely satisfied with the surgery and the authors believe that complete ligament preservation may address this complaint

The most recent Australian registry has a database of 547,407 knee arthroplasties, having added over 52,000 in 2016. Total knee arthroplasties (TKA) comprise 83.8%, revisions (RevTKA) 8.1% and “partials of all types” 8.1%. Since 2003, the percent of TKA has increased from 76.7%, RevTKA has stayed stable and partial replacements have declined from 14.5%. In the last year, however, TKA declined slightly. There is a slightly higher percentage of women (56.1%) undergoing TKA and this has remained very stable since 2003. Revision rates are slightly higher for men. Percentages of the youngest (<55) and oldest (>85) are small and stable. The 75–84 year olds have declined as 55–74 year olds have increased. This represents a gradual shift to earlier TKA surgery. More patella are resurfaced and this is a gradual trend with a cross over in 2010 when half were resurfaced. Computer navigation is progressively more popular and now accounts for almost 30% of cases. Cement fixation is also increasing and accounts for about 65% of cases. Crosslinked polyethylene is gradually replacing non crosslinked and in 2014 was used in 50% of cases. Revisions are performed most commonly for loosening and infection. Revision rates correlate directly with age. Loosening is the most common indication for revision in both genders, but males have a distinctly higher revision rate due to infection. Revision rates are slightly higher in all forms of mobile bearing than fixed bearing. Minimally constrained (cruciate retaining) devices are used in the majority of TKAs. Posterior stabilised implants are in slight decline, having peaked in about 2008–2010. Minimally constrained implants are in slight decline as medial pivot/medial congruent devices have been used more frequently. Revision rates are similar amongst all three implant types: PS implants are revised at a slightly higher rate. When an early Medial Pivot (MP) implant is excluded the newer version has better results. The reasons for revision are similar amongst all 3 groups with slightly higher loosening rates for PS designs. (Could this represent backside wear with older locking mechanisms, surface finish and non crosslinked poly?) The MP designs had slightly higher revision rates for “pain”, which is not recognised as a reasonable indication for revision. Revision rates are steadily higher for TKAs without patella resurfacing over 16 years, but the questions as to whether: i. the surgeries were secondary resurfacings or full revisions or ii. if secondary resurfacings eliminated pain are unknown. The combinations at greatest risk of revision were a posterior stabilised or medial pivot arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Cementless fixation leads to a higher revision rate. If age and computer navigation are evaluated in terms of revision rates, young patients with and without computer navigated arthroplasties failed at the highest rates, distinct from patients >65. However, if failure rates due only to loosening are evaluated, then computer navigation leads to a lower revision rate in the <65 group. This has been interpreted as the protective effect of better component position that only shows up in patients who use the arthroplasty more aggressively. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or Individual Designed Instrumentation (IDI) were revised at marginally higher rates than conventional instrumentation. Crosslinked polyethylene appears to be superior at 12 years (CRR= 4%) versus non crosslinked polyethylene (CRR>7%). This is the result of fewer failures due to loosening with crosslinked poly. The superiority of crosslinked poly was greater in the younger, more active patient

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare intercompartmental loads and the proportion of knees with unbalanced loads after tensiometer-assisted balancing (TAB) between cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods. Forty-five CR and 45 PS TKAs using a single prosthesis were prospectively evaluated. The intercompartmental loads in 10°, 45°, and 90° of knee flexion after TAB were evaluated; the proportions of load imbalance (medial load – lateral load >15 lbs) in each flexion angle after TAB were investigated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TAB were calculated, with the sensor-balanced loads considered the reference standard. Results. The average loads of the medial compartment in CR TKA were greater than the adequate load (55 lbs) in every knee flexion angle; those of PS TKA were <55 lbs. The proportions of the load imbalance were >50% in every knee flexion angle in both CR and PS TKA (CR >64.4% and PS >57.8%), and there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.515). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TAB were 91.7%, 66.7%, 57.9% and 94.1%, respectively, in CR, and 100%, 62.5%, 40 %, and 100%, respectively, in PS TKA. Conclusions. The appropriate load balancing from the tensiometer seemed to be difficult in both CR and PS TKA. The intraoperative load sensor had a role in accurate load balancing to overcome the poor PPV of the tensiometer in both types of TKA

PURPOSE. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful technique for treating painful osteoarthritic knees. However, the patients' satisfaction is not still comparable with total hip arthroplasty. Basically, the conditions with operated joints were anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees, thus, the abnormal kinematics is one of the main reason for the patients' incomplete satisfaction. Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA was established to reproduce both ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and expected to improve the abnormal kinematics. However, there were few reports to evaluate intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA using navigation system. Hence, the aim in this study is to reveal the intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA and compare the kinematics with conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA. Materials and Methods. Twenty five consecutive subjects (24 women, 1 men; average age, 77 years; age range, 58–85 years) with varus osteoarthritis undergoing navigated BCS TKA (Journey II, Smith&Nephew) were enrolled in this study. An image-free navigation system (Stryker 4.0 image-free computer navigation system; Stryker) was used for the operation. Registration was performed after minimum medial soft tissue release, ACL and PCL resection, and osteophyte removal. Then, kinematics including tibiofemoral rotational angles from maximum extension to maximum flexion were recorded. The measurements were performed again after implantation. We compared the kinematics with the kinematics of paired matched fifty subjects who underwent conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (25 subjects with Triathlon, Stryker; 25 subjects with PERSONA, ZimmerBiomet) using navigation statistically. Results. Preoperative tibiofemoral rotational kinematics were almost the same between the three implants groups. Kinematics at post-implantation found that tibia was significantly internally rotated compared to the kinematics at registration in all three implants at maximum extension position (p<0.05), however the tibial rotational position with BCS TKA was significantly externally rotated at maximum extension position, compared to the other two implant position (p<0.05). The tibial rotational position with Triathlon PS TKA was externally rotated at 60 degrees of flexion compared to the other two implant position, however the results were not statistically significant. Discussion and Conclusion. Previous study found that PCL resection changed tibial rotational position and the amount of tibial internal rotation, affecting postoperative maximum flexion angles. This study found that BCS TKA can reduce the amount of rotational changes, compared to conventional PS TKA. Further studies are needed to investigate the kinematic changes in BCS TKA affect the postoperative clinical outcomes

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of weight-bearing on the measurement of in vivo wear of total knee replacements using model-based RSA at 1 and 2 years following surgery. Model-based RSA radiographs were collected for 106 patients who underwent primary TKR at a single institution. Supine RSA radiographs were obtained post-operatively and at 6-, 12-, and 24-months. Standing (weight-bearing) RSA radiographs were obtained at 12-months (n=45) and 24-months (n=48). All patients received the same knee design with a fixed, conventional PE insert of either a cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized design. Ethics approval for this study was obtained. In order to assess in vivo wear, a highly accurate 3-dimensional virtual model of each in vivo TKA was developed. Coordinate data from RSA radiographs (mbRSA v3.41, RSACore) were applied to digital implant models to reconstruct each patient's replaced knee joint in a virtual environment (Geomagic Studio, 3D Systems). Wear was assessed volumetrically (digital model overlap) on medial and lateral condyles separately, across each follow-up. Annual rate of wear was calculated for each patient as the slope of the linear best fit between wear and time-point. The influence of weight-bearing was assessed as the difference in annual wear rate between standing and supine exams. Age, BMI, and Oxford-12 knee improvement were measured against wear rates to determine correlations. Weight bearing wear measurement was most consistent and prevalent in the medial condyle with 35% negative wear rates for the lateral condyle. For the medial condyle, standing exams revealed higher mean wear rates at 1 and 2 years, supine, 16.3 mm3/yr (SD: 27.8) and 11.2 mm3/yr (SD: 18.5) versus standing, 51.3 mm3/yr (SD: 55.9) and 32.7 mm3/yr (SD: 31.7). The addition of weight-bearing increased the measured volume of wear for 78% of patients at 1 year (Avg: 32.4 mm3/yr) and 71% of patients at 2 years (Avg: 48.9 mm3/yr). There were no significant (95% CI) correlations between patient demographics and wear rates. Volumetric, weight-bearing wear measurement of TKR using model-based RSA determined an average of 33 mm3/yr at 2 years post-surgery for a modern, non-cross-linked polyethylene bearing. This value is comparable to wear rates obtained from retrieved TKRs. Weight-bearing exams produced better wear data with fewer negative wear rates and reduced variance. Limitations of this study include: supine patient imaging performed at post-op, no knee flexion performed, unknown patient activity level, and inability to distinguish wear from plastic creep or deformation under load. Strengths of this study include: large sample size of a single TKR system, linear regression of wear measurements and no requirement for implanted RSA beads with this method. Based on these results, in vivo volumetric wear of total knee replacement polyethylene can be reliably measured using model-based RSA and weight-bearing examinations in the short- to mid–term. Further work is needed to validate the accuracy of the measurements in vivo

First generation condylar knee replacements suffered from 2 prominent observations: Difficulty in stair climbing and Limited range of motion. Improved understanding of knee kinematics, the importance of femoral rollback, and enhanced stability in flexion led to 2 differing schools of thought: posterior cruciate ligament retention or posterior cruciate substitution. The advantages of posterior cruciate substitution include predictable CAM-post engagement leading to rollback, predictable ROM, stability during stair climbing, ease of knee balancing regardless of degree of angular deformity, and avoidance of issues such as PCL tightness / laxity at time of index procedure, as well as late ligament disruption leading to late instability. Evolution has shown that human appendages that no longer served a purpose, slowly shrivel up. As we have seen with the appendix, the coccyx, and the erector pili muscles, these vestigial organs no longer are necessary for daily function and are destined for obsolescence. I submit: the PCL in knee arthroplasty IS THE VESTIGIAL ORGAN: not the posterior stabilizing mechanism!

Introduction. Numerous fluoroscopic studies have been conducted to investigate kinematic variabilities of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In those studies, subjects having a posterior stabilized (PS) TKA experience greater weightbearing knee flexion and posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle. In those same studies, subjects did experience a high incidence of variable medial condyle motion and reverse axial rotation, especially occurring when the cam engaged the post. More recently, a PS TKA was designed to accommodate both gender and ethnicity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess in vivo kinematics for subjects having this TKA type to determine if subjects having this PS TKA experienced more optimal knee kinematics. Methods. Twenty-five subjects in this study were asked to perform a deep knee bend to maximum knee flexion and a step-up maneuver while under fluoroscopic surveillance. All subjects were patients of one experienced surgeon and received the same PS TKA. Using a 3D-2D registration technique, the CAD models, supplied by the sponsoring company, were superimposed over x-ray images at specified increments throughout the fluoroscopic footage. The kinematics were then analyzed to evaluate lateral anterior/posterior (LAP) and medial anterior/posterior (MAP) condyle translation as well as axial rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia. Results. During the DKB activity, the average flexion for the PS TKA subjects was 1108°. On average subjects experienced a lateral condyle motion in the posterior direction of 7.3mm, with the maximum amount of posterior rollback being 12.8 mm. These same subjects experienced an average medial condyle motion in the posterior direction of 4.8 mm with the maximum amount of posterior motion being 7.8 mm. Therefore, with the lateral condyle rolling more posterior than the medial condyle, these subjects experienced an average amount of 7.1° of axial rotation, with a maximum of 12.0°. Only one subject in this study experienced a reverse axial rotation from full extension to maximum knee flexion. During the step-up maneuver, subjects consistently experienced a roll forward motion of both their condyles. Discussion. Subjects in this study experienced a high incidence and magnitude of lateral condyle posterior femoral rollback, leading a normal-like axial rotation pattern, although less in magnitude compared to the normal knee. There was variability occurring with the medial condyle as some experience experienced an anterior slide while others rolled in the posterior direction. As seen in previous studies, during mid flexion both condyles experienced a more variable motion pattern. Twenty-five subjects having a posterior cruciate retaining TKA are being added to this study to determine if retention of the PCL in a similarly designed TKA leads to more normal-like kinematic patterns

Introduction. Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses:. Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. Methods. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion. Results. The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p=0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p=0.16). The rollback was significantly lower in the CR group compared to the HF-PS group; 4.4 (SD 3.0) vs. 8.4 (SD 2.1). Conclusion. The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the Posterior Stabilised-High Flexion mobile bearing compared to a Cruciate Retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. However, this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. The difference in passive flexion was probably related to a significantly lower rollback causing impingement in the CR prosthesis. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups. However, a suggestion is raised that achieving high-flexion might lead to more patellofemoral complaints/anterior knee pain

Background. In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at two years for patients implanted with a customized, posterior stabilized knee replacement system. Methods. Ninety-three patients (100 knees) with the customized PS TKR were enrolled at two centers. Patients’ length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single time point follow-up, we assessed patient reported outcomes utilizing the KOOS Jr., satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, patients’ perception of their knee and their overall preference between the two knees, if they had their contralateral knee replaced with an off-the-shelf (OTS) implant. Results. At an average of 1.9-years implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From pre-op until time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.4 on the numeric pain rating scale. Satisfaction rate was found to be high with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a “natural” perception of their knee some or all the time. Patients with bilateral implants mostly (12/15) stated that they preferred their customized implant over the standard TKR. The evaluation of KOOS Jr. showed an average score of 90 at the time of the follow up. Conclusion. Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, a subset of patients with an OTS implant in one knee and a customized PS implant in the other, we observed a trend in patients preferring the customized PS device over their OTS counterparts