Aims

Adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as an alternative to femoral nerve block (FNB) for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal duration of maintenance of the ACB is still questionable. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic benefits and physiotherapy (PT) outcomes of single-shot ACB to two different regimens of infusion of the continuous ACB, 24-hour and 48-hour infusion.

We recently performed a clinical trial comparing motor sparing blocks (MSB) to periarticular infiltration (PAI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We found that MSBs provided longer analgesia (8.8 hours) than PAI with retention of quadriceps strength, and with similar function, satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. However, its potential increased cost could serve as a barrier to its adoption. Therefore, our aim was to compare the costs of MSBs to PAI following TKA. We conducted a retrospective review of data from our previous RCT. There were 82 patients included in the RCT (n=41 MSB group, n=41 PAI group). We compared the mean total costs associated with each group until hospital discharge including intervention costs, healthcare professional service fees, intraoperative medications, length of stay, and postoperative opioid use. Seventy patients were included (n=35 MSB group, n=35 PAI group). The mean total costs for the MSB group was significantly higher ($1959.46 ± 755.4) compared to the PAI group ($1616.25 ± 488.33), with a mean difference of $343.21 (95% CI = $73.28 to $664.11, p = 0.03). The total perioperative intervention costs for performing the MSB was also significantly higher however postoperative inpatient costs including length of stay and total opioid use did not differ significatnly. Motor sparing blocks had significantly higher mean total and perioperative costs compared to PAI with no significant difference in postoperative inpatient costs. However, its quadricep sparing nature and previously demonstrated prolonged postoperative analgesia can be used to facilitate an outpatient TKA pathway thereby offsetting its increased costs

Total arthroplasties are considered as severe and very painful operations, intra- and postoperatively. The operation is usually carried out under epidural anaesthesia via a catheter and it is logical to proceed for postoperative analgesia epidurally. In this study, two methods of epidural postoperative analgesia are compared: with infusion of a local anaesthetic alone or in combination with a small dose of opioid. Material-method: Twenty-five patients, scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplastie were studied. They were randomly allocated in two groups: in group LA they received an epidural infusion of 10 ml/h ropivacaine 0,2%, while in group OP they infused epidurally 5 ml/h of a mixture of morphine 3 ug/kg in ropivacaine 0,1%. The infusion was performed using disposable pumps. At 2–6-12–24–48 hour postoperatively, analgesia (at rest and movement, VAS 0–10), sedation (0–3) and motor blockade (Bromage 0–3) were evaluated and recorded. Additionally, side effects (pruritus, nausea-vomiting) as well as the need for rescue analgesic (paracetamol 500mg on patients demand) were recorded. Results: Demographic data of two groups were comparable. In general, postoperative analgesia was satisfactory in both groups. Pain was reported by: a) at 6 h 10% of patients in LA group (none in OP group) b) at 12 h 30% of patients in LA group and 10% in OP group c) at 24 h 10% of patients in LA group and 30% in OP group and d) at 48 h 10% of patients in LA group and 0% in OP group. The 10% of patients in OP group reported pruritus at 2 h after operation. The 10% of patients in LA group presented intence motor blockade (Bromage 3) at 12 and 24 h. in case of motor blockade the infusion was discontinued and the blockade was completely recovered after 1–2 hours. In 1 patient of LA group and 2 of OP group nausea and vomiting was observed, only at the first 2 h from the end of anaesthesia. The big percentage of patients (LA group: 12 h = 27%, 24 h = 45%• OP group: 24 h = 7%) that needed additional analgesics, is attributed to a discomfort of most patients, even under light pain. Conclusions: The epidural infusion of ropivacaine alone or in combination with low dose of morphine, can be considered effective and usefull method for postoperative analgesia in total hip or knee arthroplasties

The purpose of this study was the investigation and treatment of all the complications that may occur from the epidural postoperative analgesia in patients who have undergone major orthopaedic surgery. From October 1999 to April 2002, 200 patients ASA I- III, aged 45–90 (average 72) were studied. They all received postoperative epidural analgesia and were given a mixture of local anaesthetic and Opioid analgesic, more specifically Ropivacaine 2% 10 ml/h and Morphine 0, 1 ug/h via the epidural catheter by means of a stable infusion pump. The analgesic effect covers the patients for the first 2–3 postoperative days and permits earlier and pain free mobilization and physiotherapy. The analgesic result of this method was completely satisfactory with a mean of VAS 96. The most frequent side-effects were nausea and vomiting. Pruritus, mild hypotension, hypaesthesia and motor blockage were documented as well but in a very small percentage. No case of respiratory depression or medical toxicity was mentioned, neither epidural haematoma nor infection due to the placement of epidural catheter. The complications during the recovery phase were treated easily by discontinuation of the infusion or by symptomatic therapy. Epidural analgesia with a steady infusion pump is a secure method of analgesia. However it is of great importance that the patient is informed about the epidural anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, in a such a way as to attain his/ her consent, participation and collaboration for the best therapeutic result

Introduction: Early recovery after TKR is currently one of the main challenges faced by orthopedic surgeons. The decrease in pain during the postoperative period improves functional outcome, shortens hospital stay and brings down the complications rate. We compared 3 methods of analgesia for post TKR surgery. Materials and methods: We carried out a prospective randomized study using three types of postoperative analgesia: group 1: epidural catheter, group 2: intradural analgesia plus femoral block and group 3: periarticular infiltration with an analgesic cocktail before incision closure. We included 90 consecutive TKRs performed between May and December 2006, which were randomized into one of the 3 groups. The following variables were measured at 6, 24, 48, 72 hours and on discharge: VAS (visual analgesic scale), blood pressure, heart rate, need for rescue analgesia, functional recovery of the patient, hospital stay and rate of complications. Results: Patients in group 1 had higher VAS values and a greater need of rescue analgesia. The best results were seen in group 3 (local infiltration) followed by group 2. The differences as regards locomotion and mean hospital stay were correlated with VAS values but were not statistically significant. Conclusions: We believe that periarticular infiltration with an analgesic cocktail before incision closure is a good treatment option for postoperative pain in TKR

Purpose of the study: Recent data in the literature regarding intra-articular deliver of analgesics during the postoperative period have been encouraging. Patients benefit from optimal analgesia and earlier mobilisation, shortening rehabilitation time and hospital stay and limiting complications. In light of these encouraging results, our institution developed a programme designed to address all postoperative situations associated with implantation of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Material and methods: The programme combines pre-operative counselling and a postoperative programme for multimodal anaesthesia in addition to intra-articular analgesia for 24 hours and early mobilisation. We present here the results of this technique in patients undergoing first-intention TKA. We analysed information collected prospectively in all patients who had TKA from January to June 2008: 319 patients in six months. The operation was performed under peridural anaesthesia supplemented by intra-articular ropivacaine delivered by a catheter for 24 hours. Patients were mobilised, or verticalised, the day of surgery according to individual capacities. Data collected included: pain scores, date of the end of physical therapy, and data reviewed at six weeks. Results: A cohort of 305 patients was analysed; 36% of patients were mobilised the day of the operation and 93% on day 2. The rate of urinary catheters was 12% and administration of intravenous fluids 10%. Physical therapists determined that 58% of patients could be discharged on 3 after surgery and 85% on day 5. Eighty-percent of patients were free of nausea or vomiting and had well controlled pain. Regarding function, mean range of motion was 85° at discharge with 31% of patients requiring physical therapy. At six weeks, mean range of motion was 95° and only 5% of patients had lost amplitude (reduction > 10° of range of motion) compared to discharge values. Mean scores on the Oxford questionnaire improved from 43 preoperatively to 26 six weeks postoperatively. Discussion: This multidisciplinary approach guarantees excellent postoperative analgesia with early mobilisation and provides satisfactory results at six weeks. To this can be added the benefit of a lower rate of urinary catheters, administration of intravenous fluids, and physical therapy

We describe two patients who developed gluteal compartment syndrome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) carried out under epidural analgesic infusion and light sedation. To our knowledge, this occurrence has not been described previously after TKA.

The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain relief provided by continuous perfusion of wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl with that of patient controlled analgesia using morphine in elective shoulder surgery. This retrospective case control study included 76 consecutive patients who had elective shoulder surgery. 39 patients had patient controlled analgesic system (PCA) with morphine and 37 patients had a continuous wound perfusion(intra bursal) with bupivacaine and fentanyl via a disposable Silicone Balloon Infuser. Patients were also given additional oral NSAIDs or morphine if needed. The pain score measured postoperatively based on a 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 and 18 hours was noted. The use of antiemetics and additional painkillers was recorded. The complications of both methods were also noted.

We found that the analgesia provided by continuous perfusion of wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl was constant and comparable to that provided by the patient controlled analgesic system using morphine. PCA with morphine was associated with significantly high incidence of nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001).We conclude that continuous perfusion of the wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl appears to be a simple, effective and safe method of providing analgesia following elective shoulder surgery.

The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain relief provided by continuous perfusion of wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl with that of patient controlled analgesia using morphine in elective shoulder surgery. This retrospective case control study included 76 consecutive patients who had elective shoulder surgery. 39 patients had patient controlled analgesic system (PCA) with morphine and 37 patients had a continuous wound perfusion with bupivacaine and fentanyl via a disposable Silicone Balloon Infuser. Patients were also given additional oral NSAIDs or morphine if needed. The pain score measured postoperatively based on a 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 and 18 hours was noted. The use of antiemetics and additional painkillers was recorded. The complications of both methods were also noted. We found that the analgesia provided by continuous perfusion of wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl was constant and comparable to that provided by the patient controlled analgesic system using morphine. PCA with morphine was associated with significantly high incidence of nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001). We conclude that continuous perfusion of the wound by bupivacaine and fentanyl appears to be a simple, effective and safe method of providing analgesia following elective shoulder surgery.

Purpose: Postoperative pain is common following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI) for idiopathic scoliosis (IS). It is often treated with intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA), but no studies have examined continuous morphine infusion. The purpose of this study was to identify the safety and efficacy of continuous morphine infusion without PCA for post-operative pain management in these patients.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed 338 consecutive patients from 1992 to 2006 who received continuous morphine infusion. Following induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgical incision, patients received intrathecal morphine for preemptive analgesia. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% nitrous oxide and up to 0.6% isoflurane, with minimal or no intravenous opioids. Following surgery, pre-ordered morphine infusion (0.01 mg/kg/hr) began when patients first reported pain. The infusion rate was titrated using a strict protocol based on frequent assessment of vital signs, Wong-Baker visual analog pain scores (VAS), and clinical status. The infusion continued until patients were able to take oral analgesics at postoperative day 2–3. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, intrathecal morphine dosage, intraoperative intravenous opioid dosage, pain scores through the third postoperative day, interval to start of morphine infusion, total morphine requirement in the first 48 postoperative hours, and postoperative complications.

Results: Mean intrathecal morphine dose was 15.45 mcg/kg and mean interval to start of morphine infusion was 15:45 hours. Mean VAS pain scores were 3.05, 4.48, 4.48, and 4.60 at 12 hours, 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively. The total mean dosage of morphine in the first 48 hours postoperatively was 0.03 mg/kg/hr. Nausea/vomiting, pruritis, respiratory depression, and PICU admissions related to the morphine drip occurred in 13.3%, 4.1%, 0%, and 0% of the patients during the same time period.

Conclusion: A low frequency of adverse events and a mean postoperative pain score of 5 or less demonstrates that continuous postoperative morphine infusion is a safe and effective method of pain management in children following PSF and SSI for IS. Continuous morphine infusion without PCA is a safe, alternative method of pain control for postoperative patients with IS.

Purpose

Femoral nerve block (FNB) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has had mixed results with some studies reporting improvement in pain and reduced narcotic exposure while others have not shown substantial differences. The effect of a FNB on rehabilitation indices (quadriceps strength, knee flexion) is also unclear.

The study purpose was to compare the effect of FNB+ a multimodal analgesic protocol (MMA) to MMA only on the 1) development of a complete quadriceps motor block and 2) knee flexion during the first two postoperative days and 3) knee flexion out to 12 weeks after primary TKA. Secondarily, we compared hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain, analgesic use and the incidence of nausea/vomiting.

Background

Adequate pain management is mandatory for patients' early rehabilitation and improvement of outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conventional pain management, consisted of mainly opioids, has some adverse effects such as dizziness and nausea. Motor blockade occasionally resulted from epidural analgesics. A novel multimodal analgesic strategy with peripheral nerve block, peri-articular injection (PAI) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) were utilized for our patients receiving TKA. In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects in the group of multimodal analgesia (MA) or epidural analgesia alone.

Introduction. Day stay surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is an increasingly common practice and has driven clinicians to come up with postoperative pain regimes that allow same day mobilisation and a safe and timely discharge. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of intraosseous (IO) ropivacaine used as a Bier's block to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgery. Methods. This patient blinded, pilot study randomised 15 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction to receive either IO ropivacaine 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg; or 300 mg of ropivacaine as local infiltration (standard of care). Toxic plasma levels of ropivacaine have been defined in the literature and therefore the primary outcome for this study was arterial plasma concentration of ropivacaine as a means to determine its safety profile. Samples were taken via an arterial line at prespecified times after tourniquet deflation. Secondary outcomes that we were interested in included immediate postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and perioperative opioid equivalent consumption. Results. Participants had a mean age of 27.8 (SD 9.2) years and 87% (13/15) were male. All patients in the intervention group receiving IO ropivacaine had plasma concentrations well below the threshold for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (0.60 µg/ml). The highest plasma concentration was achieved in the intervention group receiving 1.5 mg/kg dose of ropivacaine reaching 3.59 mg/ml. This would equate to 0.22 µg/ml of free plasma ropivacaine. There were no differences across the three groups regarding pain scores or perioperative opioid consumption. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that IO administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is both safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There may be scope to increase the IO dose further or utilise other analgesics via the IO regional route to improve perioperative pain relief

Background. Over 55,000 spinal operations are performed annually in the NHS. Effective postoperative analgesia facilitates early mobilisation and assists rehabilitation and hospital discharge, but is difficult to achieve with conventional, opioid-based, oral analgesia. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of two alternative techniques, namely intrathecal opioid and the more novel erector-spinae plane blockade, is unknown. The Pain Relief After Instrumented Spinal Surgery (PRAISE) trial aims to evaluate these techniques. Methods. PRAISE is a multicentre, prospective, parallel group, patient-blinded, randomised trial, seeking to recruit 456 adult participants undergoing elective, posterior lumbar-instrumented spinal surgery from up to 25 NHS hospitals. Participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive (1) Usual Care with local wound infiltration, (2) Intrathecal Opioid plus Usual Care with local wound infiltration or (3) Erector Spinae Plane blockade plus Usual Care with no local wound infiltration. The primary outcome is pain on movement on a 100mm visual analogue scale at 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain at rest, leg pain, quality of recovery (QoR-15), postoperative opioid consumption, time to mobilisation, length of hospital stay, health utility (EQ-5D-5L), adverse events and resource use. Parallel economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results. Differences in the primary outcome at 24 hours will be estimated by mixed-effects linear regression modelling, with fixed effects for randomisation factors and other important prognostic variables, and random effects for centre, using the as-randomised population. Treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals will be presented. Conclusion. The study is due to open in May 2024 and complete in 2026. Conflicts of Interest. No conflicts of interest declared. Sources of Funding. NIHR Health Technology Award – grant number NIHR153170. Trial presentations so far. APOMP 2023 and 2024; RCOA conference, York, November 2023; Faculty of Pain Management training day, London, February 2024

The postoperative pain after hip arthroscopy remains a major challenge in the immediate postoperative period. Adequate postoperative analgesia has been associated with increased patient satisfaction and decreased consumption of opioids. We evaluated the efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) versus fascia iliaca block (FIB) in reducing post-operative pain and analgesic consumption within the first 24 hours following arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Thirty-nine patients (17 females and 25 males, ages 18–42 years, mean ± SD (27.9 ± 6.2), and mean BMI of 25.13±5.08 kg/m2 were scheduled for primary arthroscopic management of FAI. Included patients were randomized into two groups according to the block used in each. Group (A) 19 patients were included and had FIB and group (B) 20 patients were included and received PENG block. The efficacy of both techniques was clinically and statistically valuated using VAS score and quadriceps muscle power. There was a statically significance difference in the mean at rest between the two groups at all measured time points following surgery (6, 12, 18 and 24 h). Also, in dynamic pain scores (with hip flexion) scores were statistically significant at 24 hours post-operative (P = .001). Total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperative was lower in the PENG group with significant difference of mean 16.5 ±9.9 mg for PENG group versus 27.5±9.6 mg for FIB group (P < .005). Five patients (26.31%) in FIB group had weaker quadriceps muscle power while none in PENG group patients had quadriceps weakness. PENG block might be considered as an ideal regional anesthesia modality for hip arthroscopy. As an alternative to more conventional regional nerve blocks such as a fascia iliaca block. PENG block is easily performed in the preoperative setting, and appears to spare motor function while providing a prolonged sensory pain relief

The current study aims to find the role of Enhance Recovery Pathway (ERP) as a multidisciplinary approach aimed to expedite rapid recovery, reduce LOS, and minimize morbidity associated with Non Fusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction (NFASC) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 35 AIS patients who underwent NFASC with Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 curves with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up was done. Patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative analgesia, mobilization, length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction survey score with respect to information and care, and 90 days complications were collected. The cohort included 34 females and 1 male with a mean age of 15.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 16 Lenke 1 and 19 Lenke 5 in the study. Mean preoperative major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb's angle were 52˚±7.6˚ and 51˚±4.5˚ respectively. Average blood loss and surgical time were 102 ±6.4 ml and 168 ± 10.2 mins respectively. Average time to commencing solid food was 6.5±1.5 hrs. Average time to mobilization following surgery was 15.5± 4.3 hrs. The average duration to the stopping of the epidural was 42.5±3.5 hrs. The average dose of opioid consumption intraoperatively was 600.5±100.5 mcg of fentanyl i.v. and 12.5±4.5 mg morphine i.v. Postoperatively opioids were administered via an epidural catheter at a dose of 2 mg of morphine every 24 hours up to 2 days and an infusion of 2mcg/hr of fentanyl along with 0.12-0.15% ropivacaine. The average duration to transition to oral analgesia was 55.5±8.5 hrs .20 patients had urinary catheter and the average time to removal of the catheter was 17.5±1.4 hrs. 25 patients had a chest tube and the average time to remove of chest tube was 25.5±3.2 hrs. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1±0.5 days. No patient had postoperative ileus or requirement of blood transfusion or any other complications. No correlation was found between LOS and initial cobb angle. The application of ERP in AIS patients undergoing NFASC results in reduced LOS and indirectly the cost, reduced post-operative opioid use, and overall improve patient satisfaction score

Aims. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the pooled incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint replacement (TJR)) and to evaluate the risk factors and complications associated with POUR. Methods. Two authors conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus on TJR and urinary retention. Eligible studies that reported the rate of POUR and associated risk factors for patients undergoing TJR were included in the analysis. Patient demographic details, medical comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes and complications were separately analyzed. The effect estimates for continuous and categorical data were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, respectively. Results. A total of 31 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 29 studies entered our meta-analysis, which included 3,273 patients diagnosed with POUR and 11,583 patients without POUR following TJR. The pooled incidence of POUR was 28.06%. Demographic risk factors included male sex (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.59), increasing age (SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.27), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 to 4 (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.77). Patients with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.83) and retention (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.06) were more likely to develop POUR. Surgery-related risk factors included spinal anaesthesia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74) and postoperative epidural analgesia (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.82). Total hip arthroplasty was associated with higher odds of POUR compared to total knee arthroplasty (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.20). Postoperatively, POUR was associated with a longer length of stay (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.39). Conclusion. Our meta-analysis demonstrated key risk variables for POUR following TJR, which may assist in identifying at-risk patients and direct patient-centered pathways to minimize this postoperative complication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):601–611

Aims. Single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative analgesia is a common modality. Patients can experience breakthrough pain when the effect of ACB wears off. Local anaesthetic infusion through an intra-articular catheter (IAC) can help manage breakthrough pain after TKA. We hypothesized that combined ACB with ropivacaine infusion through IAC is associated with better pain relief compared to ACB used alone. Methods. This study was a prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of combined ACB+ IAC-ropivacaine infusion (study group, n = 68) versus single-shot ACB+ intra-articular normal saline placebo (control group, n = 66) after primary TKA. The primary outcome was assessment of pain, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included active knee ROM 48 hours after surgery and additional requirement of analgesia for breakthrough pain. Results. The study group (mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 5.5 (SD 0.889)) experienced significant reduction in pain 12 hours after surgery compared to the control group (mean VAS 6.62 (SD 1.356); mean difference = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.46 to 0.67; p < 0.001), and pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD-2 were lower in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference in VAS pain = 1.04 (-1.39 to -0.68, 95% CI, p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the study group (0 vs 3 in the control group) required additional analgesia for breakthrough pain, but this was not statistically significant. The study group had significantly increased active knee flexion (mean flexion 86.4° (SD 7.22°)), compared to the control group (mean 73.86° (SD 7.88°), mean difference = 12.54, 95% CI 9.97 to 15.1; p < 0.014). Conclusion. Combined ACB+ ropivacaine infusion via IAC is a safe, reproducible analgesic modality after primary TKA, with superior analgesia compared to ACB alone. Further large volume trials are warranted to generate evidence on clinical significance on analgesia after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1082–1088

Introduction. Pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) heavily influences timing of mobilization and rehabilitation postoperatively as well as length of hospital stay. Recently, periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (EXPAREL®; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California) has demonstrated pain relief comparable to femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in TKA with earlier mobilization and shortened hospital stay. In order to better explore the use of EXPAREL® in TKA, we standardized the postoperative analgesia to intraoperative periarticular injection of multimodal pain management, which is a recommended postoperative method of pain control in TKA. We studied the effectiveness of periarticular EXPAREL® in TKA postoperative pain control, including impact on early mobilization and length of hospital stay, compared to another local analgesic (Ropivacaine) when both are used as part of a multimodal pain management approach. Methods. We performed a double blind, randomized, controlled, prospective, IRB-approved study that enrolled 96 participants who underwent a unilateral TKA by one surgeon between May 2014 and March 2015. The two randomized groups were as follows: group 1 (control group) was given the standard intra-articular “pain cocktail” injection, consisting of ropivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine mixed with saline into a 100cc preparation and group 2 (study group) was given a similar intra-articular injection consisting of bupivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine mixed with saline into an 80cc preparation as well as an injection of EXPAREL®, 20cc of 1.3% EXPAREL®, to total 100cc. All patients included in the study were determined to be opioid naïve as described by the Food and Drug Administration criteria. Patients were treated with the same postoperative pain management protocol as well as the same post-operative physical therapy program. The consumption of oral and intravenous narcotics at specific time points as well as total use was recorded during hospital stay. We recorded Visual Analog Pain scores, hours to ambulate 100 feet and length of hospital stay (hours). Both the investigator and the patient were blinded as to which group the patient was randomized, making this a double blind study. Results. On a per hour basis, the mean use of narcotics of the two groups differed by only 0.1mg. For total narcotic use during hospital stay, the weighted sum used by patients in the EXPAREL® group, 97.7mg of hydrocodone ±42.84 mg, exceeded the weighted sum, 89.6 mg of hydrocodone ± 58.57 mg, used by patients in the control group. The difference between the two groups was not significant. The means for length of stay differed by only 26 minutes and the difference was not significant. Similarly insignificant, the means for the time to ambulate 100 feet differed by 53 minutes, with the EXPAREL® group actually taking the longer time. The two groups did not differ for Visual Analog Score for pain on day 1 or day 2 post-operatively. Conclusion. When comparing the use of EXPAREL® to another multimodal pain management approach using ropivacaine, there is no difference in post-operative opioid consumption, Visual Analong Scores for pain, amount of time to ambulate or length of hospital stay

At our district general hospital in the southwest of England, around 694 total knee replacements (TKR) are performed annually. Since spring 2013 we have been using an enhanced recovery protocol for all TKR patients, yet we have neither assessed compliance with the protocol nor whether its implementation has made a discernible and measurable difference to the delivery of care in this patient population. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multi-modal care pathways designed to aid recovery. They are based on best evidence and promote a multi-disciplinary approach which standardises care and encompasses nutrition, analgesia and early mobilisation throughout the pre, intra and postoperative phases of an inpatient stay. ERAS has been found to reduce length of stay (LOS), readmission rates and analgesic requirements following surgery. 1, 2, 3. Additionally, they have been shown to improve range of knee movement following TKR and improve mobility, patient satisfaction whilst reducing mortality and morbidity. 4, 5, 6. With these benefits in mind, we sought to investigate how well our trauma and orthopaedic department was complying with a local ERAS protocol and whether we could replicate the benefits seen within the literature. Following approval from our local audit office in September 2015 we generated a patient list of elective TKR patients under the same surgeon before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Using discharge summaries and patient notes we extracted data for 39 patients operated on prior to the ERAS implementation between January 2011 and December 2012 and 27 patients following its introduction between January 2014 and September 2015. Data collected included length of stay, time to discharge from inpatient physiotherapy and use of analgesia and antiemetics. Alongside this we audited the compliance with all facets of the local ERAS protocol. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of demographics or pre-operative morbidity. Overall compliance with the ERAS protocol was good but there was some variability, especially with intraoperative medication and type of anaesthesia which was likely due to individual patient factors. Compliance with postoperative analgesia was especially good with 93% of patients receiving all 4 suggested analgesics within the ERAS group. Length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced by 0.5 days per patient (p value < 0.4). Overall compliance with the ERAS protocol was good but there was some variability, especially with intraoperative medication and type of anaesthesia, which was likely due to individual patient factors. Compliance with postoperative analgesia was especially good with 93% of patients receiving all suggested analgesics within the ERAS group. In terms of LOS, we found a statistically significant difference between the pre-ERAS and ERAS group of 0.5 days per patient. Within the context of our DGH, a 0.5 day reduction in LOS translates to around 350 bed days per year and a potential saving of GBP 105,000 (EUR 132,000) making this a clinically significant finding